SUSTAINABILITY - Egbc.ca

2y ago
105 Views
2 Downloads
288.85 KB
16 Pages
Last View : 16d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jewel Payne
Transcription

ALL DISCIPLINESSUSTAINABILITYAPEGBC PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINESV1.1

TABLE OF CONTENTSDefinitions41.0 Sustainability and APEGBC Professionals555What is Sustainability?How Does it Relate to Professional Engineering and Geoscience2.0 The Sustainability Guidelines 2.12.22.32.42.56Guideline 1: Maintain a Current Knowledge of Sustainability 6Guideline 2: Integrate Sustainability into ProfessionalPractice6Guideline 3: Collaborate with Peers and Experts fromConcept to Completion6Guideline 4: Develop and Prepare Clear Justification toImplement Sustainable Solutions6Guideline 5: Assess Sustainability Performance andIdentify Opportunities for Improvement63.0 Appendix I: Sustainability Guidelines AmplificationsGuideline 1: Maintain a Current Knowledge of Sustainability79 Guideline 2: Integrate Sustainability into Professional Practice 10Guideline 3: Collaborate with Peers and Experts from Conceptto Completion11 Guideline 4: Develop and Present Clear Justification toImplement Sustainable Solutions12Guideline 5: Assess Sustainability Performance and IdentityOpportunities for Improvement13V1.1 Revised April 2016Original, May 2013 2016 APEGBC. All rights reserved.PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY

DEFINITIONSThe following definitions are specificto these APEGBC Professional PracticeGuidelines - Sustainability (“SustainabilityGuidelines”). All references in the textto these terms are italicized in thefirst instance.APEGBCThe Association of Professional Engineersand Geoscientists of British Columbia.APEGBC professional(s)Professional engineers, professionalgeoscientists, engineering licensees, andgeoscience licensees.4 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES –SUSTAINABILITY

SUSTAINABILITY AND APEGBCPROFESSIONALSWHAT IS SUSTAINABILITY?A sustainable society meets the needs ofpeople in a resilient economy withoutcompromising the planet’s ecologicalintegrity or the needs of future generations.Sustainability has three pillars that must beintegrated in a balanced way:a) e nvironmental: to stay within thebiophysical carrying capacity of ourregion/country/planet (e.g. minimizeresource use, minimize waste, protectnature from degradation);b) s ocial: to maintain and protect qualityof life and the values that we aspire tolive by; andc) e conomic: to ensure that an adequatematerial standard of living is providedfor all members of society.HOW DOES IT RELATE TOPROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING ANDGEOSCIENCEto the basic pillars of sustainability(environmental, social and economic).This requires that we consider the longterm consequences that flow directly andindirectly from our actions.APEGBC professionals must not makepromises of results for sustainablesolutions as this will probably negate theirprofessional liability insurance coverage.These APEGBC Sustainability Guidelinesare an update of APEGBC’s formerGuideline on Sustainability, originallyadopted in 1995. APEGBC professionalsare encouraged to view their workthrough the “lens of sustainability”, usingthese Sustainability Guidelines to assistthem where appropriate. Sector-specificguidelines for sustainable engineering andgeoscience practice are also available onthe APEGBC website.APEGBC professionals have a significantrole to play in the development ofa sustainable society through theirprofessional practice. Our actions directlyand indirectly shape the world we livein, including the resources we use, aswell as the health, safety, environment,and wellbeing of the public. APEGBCprofessionals make decisions andprovide leadership to our colleagues,clients, employers, decision-makersand the public in the development,implementation, operational life spans,and decommissioning of engineering andgeoscience projects, products, processes,or systems.We have a responsibility to the public,consistent with the APEGBC Code ofEthics (the “Code of Ethics”), to providesustainable solutions that adherePROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY5

THE SUSTAINABILITY GUIDELINESWithin their scope of professionalpractice, APEGBC professionals have aresponsibility to:2.1 GUIDELINE 1: MAINTAINA CURRENT KNOWLEDGE OFSUSTAINABILITYMaintain a level of competence on mattersof sustainability related to the APEGBCprofessional’s area of expertise, and seekadditional expertise as necessary. Theknowledge, concepts and opportunities forsustainable solutions are rapidly evolvingand APEGBC professionals should striveto keep skills up to date, and advance theunderstanding of sustainability in theirfield of practice.2.2 GUIDELINE 2: INTEGRATESUSTAINABILITY INTOPROFESSIONAL PRACTICEIntegrate sustainability considerationsinto professional practice, reflecting theAPEGBC Code of Ethics’ requirements tohold paramount the safety, health andwelfare of the public and the protection ofthe environment. APEGBC professionalsmust consider the combined environmental,social and economic aspects that take intoaccount the direct and indirect impacts overthe full project life-cycle.2.3 GUIDELINE 3: COLLABORATEWITH PEERS AND EXPERTS FROMCONCEPT TO COMPLETIONAt key stages of the project life-cycle,collaborate with peers and expertsacross disciplines to identify appropriatealternatives and new opportunities forsustainable results.6 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY2.4 GUIDELINE 4: DEVELOP ANDPREPARE CLEAR JUSTIFICATIONSTO IMPLEMENT SUSTAINABLESOLUTIONSDiscuss opportunities and documentdecisions made related to the integrationof environmental, social and economicmetrics. These discussions should occurearly enough to enable the client oremployer to make informed decisions abouthow to implement an appropriate level ofsustainability considerations in the task orprojects, products, processes, or systems.2.5 GUIDELINE 5: ASSESSSUSTAINABILITY PERFORMANCEAND IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES FORIMPROVEMENTIdentify opportunities to improveknowledge and professional practicerelated to sustainability, where bestpractice is to assess actual performance ofimplemented solutions against the originaldesign goals and metrics.An amplification of each guideline isprovided in Appendix I.

APPENDIX I SUSTAINABILITY GUIDELINEAMPLIFICATIONSSUSTAINABILITY AND APEGBCPROFESSIONALSWhat is Sustainability?The most widely quoted definition ofsustainability and sustainable developmentwas given by the United Nations’Brundtland Commission on March 20, 1987:“Sustainable development is developmentthat meets the needs of the presentwithout compromising the ability of futuregenerations to meet their own needs.”Since that time, the definition and scope ofsustainability has expanded to encompassall aspects of human activities.Sustainability requires us to be smart aboutmanaging our resources and impacts, withthe long term in mind. In other words,we need to think about the way we useour natural, social, and economic capitalso that we don’t use them up too fast ormake conditions worse for others while webenefit ourselves (“others” can mean thosein different places around the world orfuture generations).How Does it Relate to ProfessionalEngineering and Geoscience?This preamble emphasizes the relevance ofthe Sustainability Guidelines to the scopeof an APEGBC professional’s task and workresponsibilities. APEGBC professionalsmust consider these SustainabilityGuidelines in their work; the application ofthe Sustainability Guidelines is, however, amatter of judgment.The concept of sustainability in the practiceof professional engineering and geoscienceis not new. Sustainability is already a keyelement to our professional practice wherewe carry out our roles considering ethical,environmental, social and economicchallenges. By continually gathering newknowledge, developing new materials andtechnologies, and using more sophisticateddecision-making methods, we delivereconomic benefits, minimize negativeenvironmental impacts and improvesocietal wellbeing.APEGBC professionals already have anexplicit mandate to protect public welfareand the environment. The first principle ofour Code of Ethics states:“Professional Engineers and Geoscientistsshall hold paramount the safety, healthand welfare of the public, the protection ofthe environment and promote health andsafety within the workplace.”Two of the three components ofsustainability (social and environmental)are explicitly captured by this firstprinciple of the Code of Ethics. The thirdcomponent of sustainability (providinga healthy economy) is implicit, becauseit lies at the core of what professionalengineers and geoscientists do.Incorporating sustainability requiresbalancing environmental, social andeconomic interests.These Sustainability Guidelines areintended to help clients, employersand stakeholders understand thatsustainability considerations are afundamental part of the proper practiceof professional engineering andgeoscience. By demonstrating that thetask requires specialized knowledgeand responsibility for life, property andthe environment, these SustainabilityGuidelines help reinforce the public’sappreciation of APEGBC professionals asprofessionals who act in the public interest.PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY7

These Sustainability Guidelines serveto explain APEGBC professionals’responsibilities related to society andthe environment (as listed in the Codeof Ethics), and to provide advice andencouragement to APEGBC professionalsin delivering more sustainable solutions.APEGBC – A Pioneer in SustainableEngineering and GeoscienceIn 1995, APEGBC released the firstsustainability guidelines for APEGBCprofessionals1. The present documentupdates these original guidelines, whileacknowledging and building upon theground-breaking work that APEGBC and itsSustainability Committee did at the time.Sustainability has become an importantissue for engineers and geoscientists acrossCanada and internationally, not just inBritish Columbia.Engineers Canada is the nationalorganization of the 12 provincial andterritorial associations that regulateengineering in Canada. Engineers Canadareleased the National Guideline onEnvironment and Sustainability2 2 in 2006which APEGBC’s Council endorsed inOctober 2011.LimitationsThese Sustainability Guidelines set outgeneral concepts and principles to informAPEGBC professionals on why sustainabilityis relevant in professional practice.1APEGBC (1995) “Guidelines for Sustainability”. Available online at: apeg.bc.ca2Engineers Canada “National Guidelines on Environment andSustainability”. Available online at: engineerscanada.ca8 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY

GUIDELINE 1: MAINTAIN A CURRENTKNOWLEDGE OF SUSTAINABILITYMaintain a level of competence on mattersof sustainability related to the APEGBCprofessional’s area of expertise, and seekadditional expertise as necessary. Theknowledge, concepts and opportunities forsustainable solutions are rapidly evolvingand APEGBC professionals should striveto keep skills up to date and advance theunderstanding of sustainability in theirfield of practice.interrelationships develop through practice.Currently, many APEGBC professionalshave an understanding of, and support, theindividual pillars of sustainability, but maynot be familiar with relationships betweenthese pillars and their own professionalpractice. Achieving sustainability, however,requires an appreciation of the complexrelationships between each of the threepillars of sustainability.Sustainability is a complex conceptthat involves careful consideration andbalancing of three pillars: environmental,economic and social. APEGBC professionalshave identified “lack of knowledge ofhow to employ sustainability” in theirpractice as one of the main barriers to theintegration of sustainability in their work.Guideline 1 emphasizes that ongoing andcontinuous professional development is animportant aspect of sustainability, becausethe state of the art is constantly advancing.Put simply, Guideline 1 recommends thatAPEGBC professionals “be current”, so thatthey are knowledgeable about up-to-datesustainability concepts, technologies andapproaches to practice in their field. Therequirement for APEGBC professionalsto maintain a current knowledge ofsustainability is embodied in the sixthprinciple of the Code of Ethics, whichstates that:As sustainable solutions are becoming anexpectation of Canadian society, APEGBCprofessionals are increasingly being askedby their clients, their employers and/orthe public to demonstrate competenceat the most current level of sustainablepractice. There is an opportunity forAPEGBC professionals to be leadersat the provincial and national levels.Requirements stipulated by codes ofpractice are conservative by nature, soAPEGBC professionals should advocatefor new standards where there are clearlinks to demonstrated improvements insustainable approaches and solutions.While practicing sustainable design willultimately become the accepted standard,the best professionals seek out the nextlevel of performance, as boundaries arecontinually challenged.“Members and licensees shall keepthemselves informed in order to maintaintheir competence, strive to advance thebody of knowledge within which theypractice and provide opportunities forthe professional development of theirassociates.”The APEGBC professional’s understandingof sustainability will evolve as his or herappreciation and understanding of natural,economic and social systems and theirBy maintaining a current knowledge ofsustainability, guided by sound, peerreviewed science as it relates to professionalengineering and geoscience practice,APEGBC professionals provide greater longterm value by delivering smart sustainablesolutions that extend across disciplinaryboundaries and address the wider impactsof the project.Additional benefits to APEGBCprofessionals and the public may include: Reductions in energy and material use,waste production, and operational costsPROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY9

I mprovements in the reputation ofAPEGBC professionals as being proactivepractitioners of sustainable professionalengineering or geoscience, which isincreasingly important to clients andstakeholders and is also a basis fordifferentiation on the value of theservice provided P roactive management of issues such asadaptation to climate change, mitigationof greenhouse gas emissions, and energy/materials/waste minimization in advanceof government regulation on these issues(BC’s regulation of carbon, new buildingenergy codes, etc.) Public endorsement of a project throughstakeholder engagementIt is recognized that individual APEGBCprofessionals cannot be expected toassume responsibility for incorporatingsustainability in work or tasks beyond thescope of their authority. In areas withintheir scope of authority, however, APEGBCprofessionals are required to keep theirknowledge current and seek appropriateexpertise where required (see alsoGuideline 3, below).GUIDELINE 2: INTEGRATE SUSTAINABILITYINTO PROFESSIONAL PRACTICEIntegrate sustainability considerationsinto professional practice, reflecting theAPEGBC Code of Ethics’ requirement tohold paramount the safety, health andwelfare of the public, the protection of theenvironment and promoting health andsafety within the workplace.APEGBC professionals have an importantresponsibility to society. This responsibilityis codified in the Code of Ethics, whichAPEGBC professionals must uphold. TheCode of Ethics explicitly compels APEGBCprofessionals to hold paramount thesafety, health and welfare of the public,and the protection of the environment,and to promote health and safety withinthe workplace. Specifically, the Code ofEthics states, in part, that APEGBCprofessionals shall:“act at all times . with fidelity to thepublic needs” (Preamble), and“hold paramount the safety, health andwelfare of the public, the protection of theenvironment.” (Section 14 (a) (1))10 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITYThese provisions in the Code of Ethicsimplicitly require APEGBC professionalsto have regard for sustainability in theirpractice, because of sustainability’sinherent relationship to societal needs, thesafety, health or welfare of the public, andthe environment. Sustainable professionalengineering and geoscience practice,as described in these SustainabilityGuidelines, seeks to address these Codeof Ethics responsibilities.APEGBC professionals already haveexpertise in weighing economic andperformance issues, such as cost andfactors of safety. The application of theseSustainability Guidelines will help APEGBCprofessionals incorporate environmentaland social issues in their practice.Embodied in Guideline 2 is theconsideration of the short and long-term,as well as direct and indirect impactsof APEGBC professional’s designsand activities. It encourages APEGBCprofessionals to think outside traditionalproject boundaries and to consider the

greater impacts of their designs andprojects. As we learn more about the wayour world works – particularly, the waythat humans and ecosystems interact – welearn more about what it takes to addressthe well-being of current and futuregenerations and ecosystems. These ideassteer us away from thinking in termsof “trading-off” human welfare againstecosystem wellbeing.There is almost always more than oneway to perform a task. Evaluation ofoptions should consider the full, lifecycle costs, from project conception tofinal decommissioning in order to fullyunderstand the impacts of differentalternatives. Evaluating potential designsof projects may require assessment of theirresiliency or future adaptability to a rangeof potential future altered climate patterns.In reviewing a project’s full life cycle costs,the APEGBC professional needs to considermeasures to mitigate climate change,including but not limited to minimizinggreenhouse gas emissions, while balancingeconomic, social and environmentalfactors. Many of the real costs of projectsare commonly externalized and notconsidered as part of making a decision ona preferred alternative. It is important to tryto consider the full costs and benefits of anyproposed action.In recommending specific options,APEGBC professionals should not limittheir considerations to only technicalissues. For each task, APEGBC professionalsshould consider other implications thatare within their field of expertise. Knownand reasonably foreseeable cumulativeimplications should also be considered.Finally, decisions for sustainability requirea consideration of the consequences ofnot only the proposed action, but also itsproducts and by-products, including theirfinal disposal.GUIDELINE 3: COLLABORATE WITHPEERS AND EXPERTS FROM CONCEPT TOCOMPLETIONAt key stages of the project life-cycle,collaborate with peers and expertsacross disciplines to identify appropriatealternatives and new opportunities forsustainable results.The increasing complexity and innovationin providing sustainable solutionsmeans that APEGBC professionals willincreasingly work in multi-disciplinaryteams with team members having diverseknowledge and skills.It is best to collaborate at the earliest stages,if possible, where opportunities for synergybetween project components can moreeasily be explored to increase value andsustainability.PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY11

GUIDELINE 4: DEVELOP AND PRESENTCLEAR JUSTIFICATIONS TO IMPLEMENTSUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONSDiscuss opportunities and documentdecisions made related to the integrationof environmental, social and economicmetrics. These discussions should occurearly enough to enable the client oremployer to make informed decisions abouthow to implement an appropriate level ofsustainability considerations in the task orprojects, products, processes, or systems.Through their widely varying professionalactivities, APEGBC professionals contributeto the form and function of our society:they are frequently decision-makers or in aposition to influence decision-makers. Asthe advice given by APEGBC professionalscan have far-reaching consequences,APEGBC professionals should exploresolutions that promote a broad conceptof sustainability – across environmental,social and economic domains.In the course of an APEGBC professional’swork, there are a number of stages whereopportunities exist to investigate thesocial, environmental and economicimpacts of potential solutions to a client’sproblem. APEGBC professionals shouldcarefully weigh the impacts of alternativesand may provide a comparative analysison their environmental, social andeconomic impacts.The purpose of exploring alternatives is toencourage consideration of processes oroptions that best promote sustainability.This will have the greatest impact at theconceptual phase, where opportunities toapply best practices can be evaluated andclear justifications can encourage a clientor employer to make an informed decisionregarding sustainable solutions. APEGBCprofessionals are not obliged to assess allconcepts, designs and methodologies,12 PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITYonly those that are deemed reasonableunder the circumstances of the task. Indetermining what is “reasonable”, APEGBCprofessionals are expected to exerciseprofessional judgment.Guideline 4 highlights the APEGBCprofessionals’ duty to exercise theirprofessional judgment objectivelyand consistently. Honest differencesof technical opinion among APEGBCprofessionals are to be anticipated becausethe matters involve professional judgmentand are not subject to simple analysis. Opendebate between APEGBC professionals ishealthy and helpful to decision-makers.Care must be taken to provide independentprofessional guidance and analysis, thepublic will be best served if APEGBCprofessionals maintain objectivity.With respect to documenting decisionsmade, APEGBC professionals shouldrefer to APEGBC Bylaw 14(b), whichaddresses quality management processesfor retaining project documentation.More information on retaining projectdocumentation is available in the APEGBCQuality Management Guideline onRetention of Project Documentation,available on the APEGBC website.While the APEGBC professional canpresent the opportunities and rationalefor sustainable solutions, the decision onsustainable solutions remains with theclient or employer.

GUIDELINE 5: ASSESS SUSTAINABILITYPERFORMANCE AND IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIESFOR IMPROVEMENTIdentify opportunities to improveknowledge and professional practicerelated to sustainability, where bestpractice is to assess actual performance ofimplemented solutions against the originaldesign goals and metrics.It is important to confirm whether designsare performing to expectations. Thatknowledge can be gained through bothqualitative and quantitative data forthe benefit of the profession and futuredevelopments. Where possible andreasonable, analysis of data should be usedto improve or optimize future solutions.The practice of professional engineeringand geoscience continually improves dueto technological advances, innovationand new design concepts. Assessingperformance enables APEGBC professionalsto identify opportunities for iterativeimprovements in designs, methods,processes, and technology. This informationcontributes to the learning process and canbe utilized by other APEGBC professionalsto identify and enhance future solutions.APEGBC professionals should facilitateimprovements and seek to proactivelyanticipate future needs for sustainability.These improvements should adopt amulti-disciplinary approach, considerrisk based assessments and considercumulative impacts, social values,economic requirements, andenvironmental aspects. As knowledgeof sustainability evolves, existing codes,guidelines and standards may need to beupdated. Actively working with others asleaders in the development of new bestpractices and legislation will enhance thepublic view of APEGBC professionals asethical professionals who provide viable,valuable knowledge-based solutions.PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES – SUSTAINABILITY13

THE ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND GEOSCIENTISTS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA200 – 4010 Regent Street, Burnaby, British Columbia V5C ca APEG.BC.CA

2.1 Guideline 1: Maintain a Current Knowledge of Sustainability 6 2.2 Guideline 2: Integrate Sustainability into Professional Practice 6 2.3 Guideline 3: Collaborate with Peers and Experts from Concept to Completion 6 2.4 Guideline 4: Develop and Prepare

Related Documents:

1.3. Why Develop a Sustainability Plan? 5 1.4. Relationship to Other ICLEI Tools and Programs 6 1.5. Lessons Learned from NYC 7 2. Scope of a Sustainability Plan 8 2.1. Sustainability Plans vs. Climate Action Plans 8 2.2. Typical Elements of a Sustainability Plan 10 3. Overview of the Five Milestones for Sustainability 11 4. Forming a Team 16

The Office of Sustainability used UC Berkeley's inventory of sustainability courses as the baseline of which courses to map by UN SDG. The courses on the sustainability course inventory are from 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 school years. UC Berkeley's sustainability course list was developed for the Sustainability, Tracking,

1. Ultimately, program sustainability exists as the goal of FORHP grant funding. The . Project Sustainability Action Plan Template . was created to provide support to Rural Health Network Development grantees in writing an effective sustainability plan. The . Project Sustainability Action Plan Toolkit. provides a framework for rural

organizational architecture that is specific to sustainability programs and sustainability staff. Sustainability programs and sustainability staff are increasing at such a rate that academic research on the subject is still emerging, leaving gaps in knowledge.

2 Drive Sustainability Progress Report ABOUT DRIVE SUSTAINABILITY I. ABOUT DRIVE SUSTAINABILITY Drive Sustainability is an automotive partnership with the following Lead Partners - BMW Group, Daimler AG, Scania CV AB, Volkswagen Group, Volvo CarsVolvo Group, - and the following Partners - FordHonda, , Jaguar Lan

approach to sustainability and sustainability communications. Please send your feedback to: Zuellig Pharma Sustainability Team sustainability@zuelligpharma.com BOUNDARY AND SCOPE The information contained in this report pertains to the period January 1 to December 31, 2020 and covers Zuellig Pharma's operations across 13 markets. Where .

The GlobeScan-SustainAbility Survey The 2017 Sustainability Leaders Introduction Over two decades, we have witnessed an evolution of the terms upon which organizations are recognized for their leadership in sustainability, and expect them to become only more demanding. This report represents a significant milestone. Sustainability Leaders, the .

technologies and computation methods for the automotive traction motors. Various cooling methods, including the natural, forced air, forced liquid and phase change types, are discussed with the pros and cons of each method being compared. The key factors for optimizing the heat transfer efficiency of each cooling system are highlighted here. Furthermore, the real life examples of these methods .