Effect Of Postweld Heat Treatment On The Toughness Of Heat-Affected .

1y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
1.31 MB
8 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Raelyn Goode
Transcription

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/14/13 4:39 PM Page 80Effect of Postweld Heat Treatment onthe Toughness of Heat-Affected Zonefor Grade 91 SteelAfter investigating the impact toughness of the heat-affected zone forGrade 91 steel welds, it was discovered that 760 C for 2 hpostweld heat treatment can significantly increase the cross-weld toughnessof the heat-affected zoneBY B. SILWAL, L. LI, A. DECEUSTER, AND B. GRIFFITHSABSTRACTWELDING RESEARCHThe impact toughness of the heat-affected zone (HAZ) for Grade 91 steel weldshas been experimentally investigated. The as-welded multipass HAZ has a significantscatter in toughness, due to variations in the Charpy notch location and the path offracture propagation. The cross-weld Charpy specimen gives a toughness value thatcan be attributed to contributions by the weld metal, various HAZ regions, and thebase metal. The microstructure evolution of various HAZ regions during postweld heattreatment (PWHT) has been investigated and used to explain the toughness changes.A 760 C for 2 h PWHT can significantly increase the cross-weld toughness of the HAZ.The measured weld HAZ toughness can be understood using a linear additive modelthat employs as the inputs the toughness values of various HAZ regions reproducedon the Gleeble . The toughness of the coarse-grained heat-affected zone (CGHAZ)recovers the slowest as a function of increasing PWHT temperature, and remains lowuntil a 730 C heat treatment. To guarantee an adequate HAZ toughness, a PWHT ofat least 730 C is recommended. Postweld heat treatment above the AC1 temperaturewill result in the formation of fresh martensite, which decreases the toughness and increases the hardness of all HAZ regions. Postweld heat treatment 20 C below the AC1temperature for 2 h has produced the highest toughness and lowest hardness of allHAZ regions.IntroductionGrade 91 steel, known as the modified9Cr-1Mo-V, designated as P91 for pipeand plate (ASTM A335 P91), and T91 fortube (ASTM A213 T91), is a creep-enhanced ferritic steel that has been widelyused in power-generating applications as aheader, superheater, and reheater. Initially developed by Sikka et al. (Ref. 1), thealloy was to have an improved strengthand toughness for liquid metal fastbreeder reactor. Then the alloy was modified by adding vanadium, nickel, aluminum, niobium, and nitrogen to becomethe modified 9Cr-1Mo-V steel. Propertiessuch as high thermal conductivity, betterresistance to stress corrosion cracking,lower thermal expansion coefficient, andhigh resistance to thermal fatigue madeB. SILWAL, L. LI (leijun.li@usu.edu), A. DECEUSTER, and B. GRIFFITHS are with the Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering,Utah State University, Logan, Utah.Presented during the AWS Professional Program atFABTECH 2012, Las Vegas, Nev.80-sMARCH 2013, VOL. 92Grade 91 a better replacement for loweralloy steels for piping and vessels. With superior mechanical properties such asyield, ultimate tensile, and creep rupturestrengths matching or exceeding that of9Cr-1Mo, 21 4Cr-1Mo, HT9, EM12, and304 stainless, Grade 91 was identified(Ref. 2) as a material of choice in thepetrochemical and nuclear industry.The as-received material of Grade 91undergoes normalizing-and-temperingheat treatment to achieve better mechanical properties. The ASME code requiresthat the steel be normalized at1038 –1149 C and tempered at a mini-KEYWORDSHeat-Affected Zone (HAZ)Grade 91Postweld Heat Treatment(PWHT)AC1 Temperaturemum temperature of 732 C. A fully tempered martensite matrix, with finely dispersed carbides, and carbo-nitrides precipitation on the grain boundaries, is thetypical microstructure. The carbides are ofM23C6-type, M being metallic elements,mainly Cr and Fe, Mn, and Mo if present;and the grain boundary carbonitrides areof MX-type, M being Nb and V, and Xbeing C and N (Ref. 3).When the as-received material undergoes manufacturing processes such as welding, the mechanical properties will changedue to phase transformations, including theformation of fresh martensite. It becomesnecessary to conduct a postweld heat treatment (PWHT) below the AC1 temperaturefor some period of time to temper themartensite and achieve the desired microstructure and mechanical properties.Because the degree of martensitic hardening depends upon the material chemicalcomposition and welding conditions, thecorrect control of time and temperature forthe PWHT becomes critical. Instead of onlyperforming tempering, it would be better todo both normalizing and tempering afterwelding to achieve better creep propertiesas suggested by Santella et al. (Ref. 4).The impact toughness as influenced byPWHT becomes important when controlling the delayed weld cracking during manufacturing, the room-temperature pressuretesting, and startup of a unit after installation and maintenance. Although variouspapers have been published on impacttoughness of the weld metal Grade 91(Refs. 5–7), the toughness of the heataffected zone (HAZ) has not been studiedin detail. The objective of this paper is tostudy the impact toughness of the HAZs inGrade 91 joints as affected by PWHT bothbelow and above the AC1 temperature.Experimental ProcedureWelding and Heat TreatmentASTM A335 P91/ASME SA335 P91 pipe

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/14/13 4:39 PM Page 81was used as base metal. The as-receivedpipe had an 8.625 in. (219 mm) outer diameter, 1.143 in. (29 mm) thickness, andwas normalized for 8 min at 1060 C andtempered for 45 min at 786 C. The chemical composition of the material is given inTable 1.Two 5-in.- (127-mm-) long pipes werewelded together by gas tungsten arc welding(GTAW) and flux cored arc welding(FCAW) processes. The double-V weldgroove had a 60-deg included angle with a1.5-mm root face. The same process was repeated eight times to conduct a full factorialdesign of the welding process parameters ofmaximum and minimum preheat temperature, interpass temperature, and heat input(as mentioned maximum being high andminimum being low hereafter). Gas tungsten arc welding was used for the root passwith 300 A DC and 1.27 m/min wire feedspeed, and FCAW was used for the fillingpasses with 26.1 and 27 V arc voltage and6.35 and 7.62 m/min wire feed speed. The0.14 m/min linear travel speed was maintained by a stepper motor controlled fixture.Pure argon shielding was used for GTAWand mixed 75/25 argon/CO2 shielding wasused for FCAW. The filler metal was 1.2mm-diameter ER90S-B9 for GTAW, andER91T1-B9 for FCAW. The linear travelspeed was 0.292 m/min.Sixteen Type-K thermocouples wereplaced on different locations from theedge of the weld groove to measure thetemperature profile. Two 8-channel dataloggers were used to record the temperature measurements with a sampling frequency of 5 Hz. After welding, the locations of the thermocouples wereremeasured relative to the weld interfaceline, which was assumed to have experienced the melting temperature. The microstructure from the HAZ of the aswelded specimen was then analyzed, andthe HAZ locations were identified andmeasured from the weld interface. For instance, the intercritical heat-affected zone(ICHAZ) was identified to be about 2.1Fig. 2 — Measured and Gleeble -simulated thermal cycle for theCGHAZ. Ptemp is programmed temperature that duplicates themeasured temperature, and TC1 is the actual temperature achievedin the specimen on the Gleeble .mm from the weld interface for weld #5.The thermocouple located at or near 2.0mm from the weld interface was then identified as that representing the ICHAZthermal cycle.The interpass temperature was alsomaintained with the use of a ceramic padheater and surface temperature probeTable 1 — Chemical Composition of Grade 91Base Material and Filler Metals i MnER90S-B9GTAWE91T1-B9FCAWBase 347 .0280.0030.0010.0053 0.040.0020.0080.0020.0020.191.34Table 2 — Average Impact Energy Values for Various Simulated HAZs, and the Baseand Filler Metals in Both the As-Welded and Heat-Treated ConditionsConditionAs-welded (J)PWHT: 760C-2H (J)Base Metal (BM)Weld Metal G JOURNAL 81-sWELDING RESEARCHFig. 1 — Schematic of the Charpy coupon extraction and location of thenotch relative to the weld metal on the left and HAZ in the base metal.

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/14/13 4:39 PM Page 82Fig. 3 — Charpy impact test results from specimens in the as-welded condition for different welding parameters. WELDING RESEARCHFig. 4 — Fracture path of an example of Charpy impact-tested, as-weldedspecimen. The fracture originated from the notch (in the lower-left corner), passed through the weld metal, HAZ, and base metal.with an accuracy of temperature control at 10 C. The preheat temperature beforewelding was between 150 and 250 C. Theinterpass temperature during welding wasbetween 200 and 300 C. A pneumaticdescaler and wire brushing were used forslag removal. A postweld bake-out at250 C temperature for 4 h was conductedwith temperature-controlled ceramic heatpads. Subsequently, the as-welded jointswere PWHT in a furnace for 2 h at varioustemperatures.Fig. 5 — Charpy impact test results for joints heat treated at 760 C for 2 h. Thejoints were made using different welding parameters.welded condition and four specimes in thePWHT condition were impact tested atroom temperature. Standard metallographic procedure was followed to preparethe specimens for optical microscopy. Thepolished specimens were etched with theNital (10% nitric acid in methanol) or LePera reagent (4% picric acid in ethanolmixed with a 1% sodium metabisulfite indistilled water in an 1:1 volume ratio) to analyze the microstructure.Microstructure SimulationImpact TestCharpy impact specimens were extracted in the pipe’s longitudinal directionfrom the middle thickness of both the aswelded and PWHT joints. Standard Charpyimpact V-notch specimens (10 10 25mm) were prepared according to ASTMA370 (Ref. 8). All specimens weremacroetched to reveal the fusion boundary,which served as the location for the notch sothat the fracture path would traverse theHAZ — Fig. 1. Three specimens in the as-82-sMARCH 2013, VOL. 92To “magnify” the small HAZ regions sothat large samples of similar microstructure can be tested, a Gleeble 1500D wasused to simulate the multipass weldingprocess. The measured thermal cycle foreach individual HAZ was reproduced inthree smooth Charpy specimens. As an example, the thermal cycle for the as-weldedcoarse-grainedheat-affectedzone(CGHAZ) is shown — Fig. 2. The simulated samples were then heat treated atdifferent temperatures from 600 to 840 Cwith a temperature difference of 40 C.Notches were machined in the middle ofthe test specimens. Two specimens foreach tempering temperature were testedand both results were reported.The average energy values for these“pure” metals (of the simulated HAZ regions, fusion zone, and base metal) arelisted in Table 2. This method of creatingsimulated samples by using the thermalcycle is different from most previous studies, because not only the first peak temperature but also the subsequent temperature peaks by multipasses were applied toachieve similar properties of the aswelded samples. The transformation temperatures AC1, AC3, Ms, and Mf temperature for the Grade 91 base metal were alsomeasured using dilatometry on the Gleeble . The specimen was heated at a rateof 100 /min from room temperature to728 C, then the heating rate was switchedto 28 /h to heat to 1300 C, at which pointthe specimen was allowed to naturally coolto room temperature. A precise extensometer measured the diameter change

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/14/13 4:39 PM Page 83ABFig. 6 — A — Microstructure of the CGHAZ from weld test #5; B — the corresponding simulated multipass CGHAZ microstructure. Nital etching.BFig. 7 — Charpy impact energy results of different HAZs after PWHTat various temperatures for 2 h.during the entire heating and coolingprocess.Results and DiscussionToughness of the HAZThe impact energy values for theHAZs in the as-welded samples are shownin Fig. 3. The average impact energy exceeds 180 J for the as-welded samples. Thedifference in impact energy values withdifferent process parameters during welding is not significant, although a greaterpreheat temperature (250 C) seems tohave produced wider scatter in impact energy of the HAZ. Lower preheat (150 C)seems to have produced a much narrowerscatter band in impact energy of the HAZ.A few as-welded samples have impact energy values close to 30 J.An inspection of the fracture path reveals the propagation of fracture in theselow toughness specimens originates fromthe notch and passes through the weldmetal, HAZ, and base metal — Fig. 4. Theweld metal in the as-welded condition hasan impact energy of 7 J. Clearly, the measured impact energy is a sensitive functionof the position of thenotch for the heterogeneous weld joint. Similarobservations have beenCmade by other researchers,suchasMoitra et al. (Ref. 10)and Jang et al. (Ref. 11),in a study of the effect ofnotch location on impacttoughness of weld metaland HAZ.After a PWHT at760 C for 2 h, the impact energy of all HAZ Fig. 8 — A — XRD spectrum of the as-received base metal Grade 91;specimens has increased B — magnified lower 2θ angle portion showing an M23C6 carbide peak;consistently — Fig. 5. C — XRD spectrum of a specimen air-cooled from 840 C, showingbroadening of peaks, indicated by the arrows, due to fresh martensite.The minimum energylevel for joints madeusing different weldingweld metal, which after the 760 C for 2 hparameters is 220 J. The wide scatter ofheat treatment, has the impact toughnessimpact energy levels for the as-weldedincreased from 7 to 56 J.weld HAZ has been narrowed down. Aninspection of fractography of testedContribution to Toughness by Individualspecimens revealed the fracture paths toZonesbe consistently starting from the notch,traversing the HAZ and base metal.The Gleeble -simulated microstrucNone of the fracture paths in the heatture is verified to be similar to that from thetreated samples has deviated into theWELDING JOURNAL 83-sWELDING RESEARCHA

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/15/13 1:58 PM Page 84Fig. 9 — Average Vickers hardness values of different HAZ zonesafter PWHT at various temperatures for 2 h.WELDING RESEARCHHAZs of the welded samples. An examplecomparison of microstructures for theCGHAZ is shown in Fig. 6. The two microstructures not only share the same grainsize, but also the martensitic substructure,size, and amount of carbide particles. Suchsimulated microstructure for the entirecross-section of the Charpy specimen enables an accurate evaluation of impacttoughness of individual HAZs.The Charpy impact results of the simulated HAZ samples heat treated at varioustemperatures for 2 h are shown in Fig. 7.Among the three HAZ regions, the ICHAZexhibits the highest toughness, while theCGHAZ has the lowest toughness and finegrained heat-affected zone (FGHAZ) hasan intermediate toughness. The CGHAZexhibits the lowest impact energy followinga 600 C, 2-h heat treatment. This low toughness remains until the PWHT temperatureis at 720 C. The impact energy of CGHAZthen increases significantly when thePWHT temperature is 760 C. A PWHT at800 C results in the peak toughness for theFig. 10 — The microstructure of ICHAZ heat treated at 840 C for 2 h and air cooled. Etchedwith Le Pera reagent, the microstructure constituents include white-etching martensite (M), tanetching ferrite (F), and dark-etching tempered martensite (TM).CGHAZ. The impact toughness then decreases when the PWHT temperature is840 C. The ICHAZ toughness remains at220 J for PWHT temperatures below 760 C,and reaches the peak value following an800 C heat treatment. The ICHAZ toughness also decreases when the PWHT temperature is 840 C. The FGHAZ toughnessincreases with a higher PWHT temperaturebetween 600 and 720 C. After the 720 CPWHT, the FGHAZ toughness has increased to the same level as that of theICHAZ. Further increases in the PWHTtemperature from 720 C result in the exactsame toughness for both the FGHAZ andICHAZ. A notable trend is that all HAZ regions reach the peak toughness following an800 C PWHT; and all HAZ regions losetoughness following an 840 C PWHT.Table 3 — Sample Calculation of Contributions of Base Metal and HAZ to the Total ImpactEnergyLCGHAZ (mm)LFGHAZ (mm)LICHAZ (mm)LBM (mm)ECGHAZ (J)EFGHAZ (J)EICHAZ (J)EBM (J)ECalc (J)EExp (J)Difference (%)As-weldedPWHT: 624151872432575The LCGHAZ value is the measured fracture length, ECGHAZ value is the calculated contribution to impactenergy by CGHAZ, ECalc is calculated total impact energy, and EExp is the measured total impact energy fromthe welded sample.84-sMARCH 2013, VOL. 92The measured impact toughness reported in Fig. 5 represents the total energyfor the fracture to traverse the entire specimen. The fracture path may have traversedthe weld metal, various HAZ zones, and thebase metal. As a first approximation, we canconsider the total impact energy (ECalc) tobe consisted of a linear summation of contributions by various zones as follows:ECalc (ECGHAZ EFGHAZ EICHAZ) (1)EWM EBMwhere ECGHAZ is the energy contributionof the CGHAZ, EFGHAZ is the energycontribution of the FGHAZ, EICHAZ is theenergy contribution of the intercriticalHAZ, EWM is the energy contribution ofthe weld metal, and EBM is the contribution of the base metal.Because the Charpy specimen has auniform width, the contribution of individual zones to the total Charpy impactenergy can be calculated using the measured fracture length in each zone. For example, for the contribution of base metal(EBM) to the total impact energy, the following formula can be used: L E BM BM E' BML Total (2)where LBM is the length of the fracturepath that falls in the base metal, LTotal isthe total length of the fracture path of theCharpy specimen, and E’BM is the measured impact energy of the “pure” basemetal. Similar definitions can be made forECGHAZ for the CGHAZ, EFGHAZ for theFGHAZ, and EICHAZ for the ICHAZ, re-

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/15/13 2:05 PM Page 85AEvolution of Microstructure during PWHTThe as-received material of Grade 91has undergone a normalization at 1060 Cand tempering at 786 C. The as-receivedmicrostructure consists of fully temperedmartensite and ferrite along with finelydispersed M23C6-type carbide. Figure 8Aand B show the XRD analysis of the asreceived material, indicating the ferritic(bcc) crystal system for the temperedmartensite and existence of M23C6-typecarbide.The transformation temperatures identified by dilatometry for slow heating andair cooling are AC1 818, AC3 925, Ms 394, and Mf 230 C for the asreceived base material. The equilibriumA1 temperature based on Mn and Ni content is also estimated using the followingformula (Ref. 12)A1( C) 845.5 43.9 (Mn Ni) 9 (Mn Ni)2(3)Cand found to be 822 C,which is very close tothe slow-heating AC1identified by dilatometry. If the PWHT temperature is above thetemperature,AC1austenite will start toform, which on-coolingwill transform to freshmartensite. A reduction in toughness willbe observed because ofsuchuntemperedmartensite. Figure 7shows the significantreduction in the meas- Fig. 11 — Microstructure of CGHAZ after heat treatment at the followingured toughness for all for 2 h: A — 640 C; B — 800 C; C — 840 C. Nital etching.HAZ regions followingan 840 C PWHT. Since840 C is above the AC1temperature,thisas a function of the PWHT temperature —toughness reduction is due to martensitethe minimum hardness at 800 C PWHTformation. Figure 8C provides the evidencecorresponds to the maximum toughness.of martensite formation in a specimen airThe significant increase in hardness followcooled from 840 C. Fresh martensite anding the 840 C PWHT can be attributed totempered martensite in Grade 91 sharethe fresh martensite. Microstructural evimost of the XRD signatures, except the subdence for martensitic transformation fortle broadening of the peaks near their basesPWHT above the AC1 temperature is avail(Ref. 3). Comparison of Fig. 8A and C doesable after etching the specimens with the Leshow a broadening of peak bases due toPera regent, which reveals the fresh martenfresh martensite. The arrows in Fig. 8C insite in white, ferrite in tan, and tempereddicate the traces of fresh martensite in themartensite and bainite in a dark color (Ref.specimen.9). In Fig. 10, the microstructure of ICHAZFurther evidence of fresh martensitefollowing an 840 C, 2-h PWHT is shown toformation for PWHT at temperaturescontain approximately 15 vol-% freshhigher than the AC1 is provided by the hardmartensite, 25 vol-% ferrite, and 60 vol-%ness of microstructure. Figure 9 shows thetempered martensite.changes in hardness of various HAZ reThe CGHAZ has experienced a peakgions as a function of the PWHT temperatemperature between 1100 C and theture. Because the microstructure is heteromelting temperature of 1382 C, duringgeneous, a 1000-g load has been used duringwhich there is a complete dissolution ofthe Vickers hardness measurements tocarbides and significant grain growth ofmaximize the indentation size, so that anthe high-carbon and high-alloy-containing“average” hardness is obtained. Comparedaustenite. Fresh martensite that formswith the toughness results shown in Fig. 7,upon cooling is strong and brittle. Althe hardness curves show an inverse trendthough it has been tempered by subse-WELDING JOURNAL 85-sWELDING RESEARCHspectively. Experimentally measured impact toughness data from the simulatedHAZ, base metal, and pure weld metal arelisted in Table 2 for the as-welded and760C-2H heat-treated conditions.Tested Charpy toughness specimenswere polished and etched to reveal the microstructure along the fracture path asshown in Fig. 4. Measurements of the lengthof fracture path that falls in each microstructure zone were taken. Sample calculations to predict the total Charpy impactenergy are shown (Table 3). Impact energydata shown in Table 2 and measured fracture length fractions are used as input parameters for the calculations. Comparedwith the experimental impact energy value(EExp), the calculated total energy (ECalc) iswithin 5% difference. Using this linearsummation method, a cross-weld HAZtoughness test result can be understood ifthe test specimen is measured metallographically for the fracture length andtoughness of individual HAZ zones aredetermined.B

SILWAL ET AL SUPPLEMENT MARCH 2013layout Layout 1 2/14/13 4:39 PM Page 86BACDWELDING RESEARCHFig. 12 — Microstructure of FGHAZ in the following conditions for 2 h: A — as-welded; B — after heattreatment at 640 C; C — 800 C; and D — 840 C. Nital etching.ABCDrite subgrains and annealing twins formed— Fig. 11B. The CGHAZ in this microstructure has the highest impact toughness. The PWHT at 840 C refines thegrain size and coarsens the carbide particles but produces the brittle fresh martensite, as explained earlier — Fig. 11C. Thetoughness decreases from the 800 CPWHT value.The fine-grained HAZ has experienceda peak temperature above AC3 (925 C) butbelow the temperature for austenitic graingrowth. The austenitized FGHAZ has anaverage grain size of 8 micrometers thattransforms to martensite on-cooling. Theas-welded microstructure following multibead welding is tempered martensite — Fig.12A. A PWHT at 640 C produces temperedmartensite and some ferrite with dispersedcarbide particles — Fig. 12B. Toughness isrecovered to above 100 J following thePWHT at 640 C. The FGHAZ also showsthe maximum toughness and minimumhardness following a PWHT at 800 C due toa microstructure of fine-grained ferrite withfine dispersed carbide particles — Fig. 12C.The PWHT at 840 C increases the grain sizeand coarsens the carbide particles but produces the brittle fresh martensite — Fig.12D. The toughness therefore decreasesfrom the 800 C PWHT value.The intercritical HAZ has experienceda peak temperature between the AC1 andAC3, therefore is partially austenitized onheating. The multibead as-welded microstructure is a mixture of base metal’sferritic constituent and newly formed andtempered martensite — Fig. 13A. The180-J toughness of ICHAZ is contributedmostly by the base metal, which has atoughness of 230 J. A PWHT at 640 C further tempers the martensite, but since thetoughness is governed by the dominatingbase metal, no significant changes in thetoughness are observed — Fig. 13B. TheICHAZ also shows the maximum toughness and minimum hardness following aPWHT at 800 C due to a microstructureof fine-grained ferrite with fine dispersedcarbide particles — Fig. 13C. The PWHTat 840 C increases the grain size andcoarsens the carbide particles but produces the brittle fresh martensite — Fig.13D. The toughness decreases from the800 C PWHT value.Fig. 13 — Microstructure of ICHAZ in the following conditions for 2 h: A — As-welded; B — after heattreatment at 640 C; C — 800 C; D — 840 C. Nital etching.Conclusionsquent thermal cycles in the multiple welds,the tempered martensite microstructurein the CGHAZ is still brittle — Fig. 6.With a PWHT at 640 C, more temperingof martensite has occurred, but the microstructure is virtually identical with thatof the as-welded CGHAZ — Fig. 11A.Therefore, the toughness of CGHAZ re-The impact toughness of the HAZ forGrade 91 steel welds has been experimentally investigated via measured thermal cycles, Gleeble simulations, and microstructural analysis. The as-welded multipassHAZ has a significant scatter in toughnessdue to variations in the Charpy notch location and path of fracture propagation. Thecross-weld Charpy specimen gives a toughness value that can be attributed to contri-86-sMARCH 2013, VOL. 92mains low until the PWHT temperature isfurther increased to above 720 C — Fig. 7.The microstructure of 800 C heat-treatedCGHAZ shows the tempering of martensite to ferrite with associated carbide precipitation. Although the grain size remains the same as the as-welded condition(average 30-μm), there are new finer fer-

butions by the weld metal, various HAZ regions, and the base metal. The microstructure evolution of various HAZ regions during PWHT has been investigated and usedto explain toughness changes.1. A 760 C for 2 h PWHT can significantly increase the cross-weld toughness ofthe HAZ.2. The measured weld HAZ toughnesscan be understood using a linear additivemodel that employs as the inputs the toughness values of various HAZ regions reproduced on the Gleeble .3. The toughness of the CGHAZ recovers the slowest as a function of increasingPWHT temperature and remains low untila 730 C heat treatment. To guarantee an adequate HAZ toughness, a minimum PWHTtemperature of 730 C for 2 h is recommended. This recommendation agrees withthe ASME code required 732 C minimumtempering temperature for the base metal.4. The upper bound temperature forHAZ toughness seems to be the AC1 temperature. Postweld heat treatment 20 Cbelow the AC1 temperature for 2 h hasproduced the highest toughness and lowest hardness of all HAZ regions. Postweld heat treatment above the AC1 temperature for 2 h will result in theformation of fresh martensite, which decreases the toughness and increases thehardness of all HAZ regions.AcknowledgmentsThis work has been financially sponsored by the Department of EnergyNEUP program. Technical guidance byDr. Richard Wright is also gratefullyacknowledged.References1. Sikka, V. K., Ward, C. T., and Thomas, K.C. 1983. Modified 9Cr-1Mo steel — an improved alloy for steam generator application.Ferritic Steels for High-Temperature Applications,Proceedings of the ASM International Conference on Production, Fabrication Properties, andApplications of Ferritic Steels for High Temperature Applications, 65–84. Metals Park, Ohio:ASM International.2. Sanderson, S. J. 1983. Mechanical properties of 9Cr1Mo steel. Ferritic Steels for HighTemperature Applications, Proceedings of theASM International Conference on Production,Fabrication Properties, and Applications of Ferritic Steels for High Temperature Applications,85–99. Metals Park, Ohio: ASM International.3. Pesicka, J., Kuzel, R., Dronhofer, A., andEggeler, G. 2003. The evolution of dislocationdensity during heat treatment and creep of tempered martensite ferritic steels. Acta Mater. 51:4847–4862.4. Santella, M. L., Swinderman, R. W., Reed,R. W., and Tanzosh, J. M. 2010. Martensite transformation, microsegregation, and creep strengthof 9Cr-1Mo-V steel weld metal. ORNL.5. Sireesha, M., Albert, S. K., and Sundaresan, S. 2001. Microstructure and mechanical properties of weld fusion zones in modified 9Cr1Mo steel. Journal of MaterialsEngineering and Performance 10(3): 320–330.6. Arivazhagan, B., Sundaresan, S., and Kamaraj, M. 2009. A study of influence of shielding gas composition on toughness of flux-coredarc weld of modified 9Cr-1Mo (P91) steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209:5245–5253.7. Barnes, A. 1995. The influence of composition on microstructural development andtoughness of modified 9Cr-1Mo weld metals.Report 509/1995. Abington, UK: TWI.8. ASTM A370, Standard Test Methods andDefinitions for Mechanical Testing of SteelProducts.9. LePera, F. S. 1980. Improved etchingtechnique to emphasize martensite and bainitein high-strength dual-phase steel. J. Met. 32(3):38, 39.10. Moitra, A., Parameswaran, P., Sreenivasan, P. R., and Mannan, S. L. 2002. A toughness study of the weld heat-affected zone of a9Cr-1Mo steel. Materials Characterization 48:55–61.11. Jang, Y. C., Hong, J. K., Park, J. H., Kim,D. W., and Lee, Y. 2007. Effect of notch position of the charpy impact specimen on the failure

After investigating the impact toughness of the heat-affected zone for Grade 91 steel welds, it was discovered that 760 C for 2 h postweld heat treatment can significantly increase the cross-weld toughness of the heat-affected zone BY B. SILWAL, L. LI, A. DECEUSTER, AND B. GRIFFITHS KEYWORDS Heat-Affected Zone (HAZ) Grade 91 Postweld Heat .

Related Documents:

B. Postweld Heat Treatments In this study, two PWHT conditions were investi-gated: SRA (an annealing heat treatment to relieve stress) and STA (a full heat treatment to solution heat treat and age). The SRA was performed by heating the specimen to 811 K (538 C) for 4 hours followed by argon quenching, whereas the STA was carried out by

50-h postweld heat treatments at 650 C. A second set of samples was PWHTed for 0.5-, 1 -, 2- and 4-h at 980 C. These heat treatments were done in a box furnace. The samples were quenched in water after heat treatment. The 1-min treatments at 650 and 980 C were per- formed with samples placed inside stain-

The effects of postweld heat treat ment on carbon steel are: (1) reduc tion of residual stress value, (2) removal of strain-aging embrittle ment, (3) reduction of heat-affected zone hardness, and (4) dimensional stability. As for the reduction of weld heat-affected zone hardness and dimen sional stability, the causes of these

To observe the heat treatment process for a 4340 and a 1018 (A36) steel sample and effect on properties. To observe the heat treatment process for a 2024 aluminum sample and effect on properties. To observe the effect of heat treatment on 260 Brass sample and effect on properties. Relate microstructure to mechanical properties

responsiveness to heat treatment. The furnace is the most important equipment used in the heat treatment process. Heat treatment furnace with effective temperature sensing, heat retaining capacity and controlled environment are necessary for heat treatment operations to be successfully performed (Alaname and Olaruwaju, 2010). Some of the

The destabilization treatment was given at 760 C for 2 h; air cooled and quenched to about 5 C. The solution treatment was given at 1050 C for about 45 min and air cooled. After PWHT, the Charpy V-notch sam ples were tested at room temperature for their impact toughness. Five samples were tested at each condition, and the

2.12 Two-shells pass and two-tubes pass heat exchanger 14 2.13 Spiral tube heat exchanger 15 2.14 Compact heat exchanger (unmixed) 16 2.15 Compact heat exchanger (mixed) 16 2.16 Flat plate heat exchanger 17 2.17 Hairpin heat exchanger 18 2.18 Heat transfer of double pipe heat exchanger 19 3.1 Project Flow 25 3.2 Double pipe heat exchanger .

American Chiropractic Board of Radiology Heather Miley, MS, DC, DACBR Examination Coordinator PO Box 8502 Madison WI 53708-8502 Phone: (920) 946-6909 E-mail: exam-coordinator@acbr.org CURRENT ACBR BOARD MEMBERS Tawnia Adams, DC, DACBR President E-mail: president@acbr.org Christopher Smoley, DC, DACBR Secretary E-mail: secretary@acbr.org Alisha Russ, DC, DACBR Member-at-Large E-mail: aruss@acbr .