Fracture Behavior With Cheese

1y ago
6 Views
2 Downloads
878.17 KB
6 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Karl Gosselin
Transcription

Fracture Behavior withCheeseLearning Objectives1)2)Students will apply their knowledge of fractureto predict how different cheeses will fail.Students will discuss how geometry plays arole in fracture behavior.Tim e 60 minutesTopics1)2)3)Mechanical testing to characterize fracturepropertiesStress concentratorsSimulations of stress (computational materialsscience)Before the Lab:Supplies to buy every time you run theactivity:1)T w o d iffe re n t typ e s o f ch e e s e . C h o o s e c h e e s e w ithd iffe re n t typ e s o f fra c tu re .Cheese TypeFracture vageColby JackDuctile and/or1/6Prior KnowledgeRecommended for Instructor:1) Familiarity with basic mechanicalproperties-S tre ss vs. stra in g ra p h s fo r b rittle vs.d u ctile m a te ria ls-T h re e -p o in t b e n d te stin g2) Basic understanding of material fracture-U n d e rsta n d th e d iffe re n ce b e tw e e nd iffe re n t typ e s o f fra ctu re m e ch a n ism sIntergranularMuensterDuctileExtra Sharp CheddarCleavageSupplies to buy as needed:1)P a p e r p la te s fo r th e ch e e se2)G lo v e s fo r th o se w h o a re la c to s e in to le ra n t3)A kn ife a n d to o th p ick to m a ke th e n o tc h e s in th ech e e sePrior KnowledgeRecommended for Students:1) Types of bonding-C o va le n t, n o n -co va le n t, io n icThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.

Fracture Behavior withCheese2/6Lab Set-up:1) Break students up into pairs. Half the groups will receive Extra Sharp Cheddar Cheese (oranother cheese that demonstrates failure via cleavage) and half the groups will receiveMuenster cheese (or another ductile cheese). Arrange the groups so that groups withdifferent cheeses are sitting close to each other to encourage sharing their results after theexperiment.2) Before the students arrive, make sure each group has:-O n e p la te w ith fiv e c h e e s e s a m p le s (s u g g e ste d m in im u m ).E a ch sa m p le sh o u ld b e a p p ro x im a te ly 2 in c h e s x 1 in ch .- T w o (m in .) c h e e s e s a m p le s w ith s h a rp n o tch--T w o (m in .) c h e e s e s a m p le s w ith b lu n t n o tchO n e (m in .) c h e e s e s a m p le w ith n o n o tchG lo ve s (if re q u e s te d b y th e p a rtic ip a n t)3) Pre-notch all of the cheese samples (see three-point bend test figure above). The sharpnotch is made using a knife to make a small slice. The blunt notch is made using a knife tocut a small wedge and then a toothpick to smooth out the edges. Video available onwebsite for sample prep and fracture testPre-lab Questions:The lecture before this lab should explain the basics of fracture and the types of fracturemechanisms.1) The cheese fracture activity fits into the structure and properties categories of thetetrahedron. Please explain why cheese fracture fits in these categories.Cheese fits into the structure and properties categoriesbecause the type of bonding in the cheese affectsthe way it fractures, which is a mechanical property.2) Match the type of fracture to its fracture surfaceIn te rg ra n u la rFracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and ApplicationsFIGUREIntergranular fracture in a steel ammonia tank. Photograph courtesy of W.L. Bradley.environmental cracking mechanisms are discussed in detail in Chapter 11. Figure 5.31 shows anintergranular fracture surface in a steel weld that was in contact with an ammonia environment.D u c tile F ra ctu reFracture Mechanisms in MetalsFIGUREHigh magnification fractograph of the steel ductile fracture surface. Note the spherical inclusionwhich nucleated a microvoid. Photograph courtesy of Mr. Sun Yongqi.Figure 5.6 illustrates the formation of the ‘‘cup and cone’’ fracture surface that is commonlyobserved in uniaxial tensile tests. The neck produces a triaxial stress state in the center of theFracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and ApplicationsFIGUREgrains.Formation of river patterns, as a result of a cleavage crack crossing a twist boundary betweensolid is approximately /P. Figure 5.14, however, indicates that the maximum stress achieved aheadof the crack tip is three to four times the yield strength. For a steel with S 400 MPa and210,000 MPa, the cohesive strength would be 50 times higher than the maximum stress achievedahead of the crack tip. Thus, a macroscopic crack provides insufficient stress concentration toexceed the bond strength.In order for cleavage to initiate, there must be a local discontinuity ahead of the macroscopiccrack that is sufficient to exceed the bond strength. A sharp microcrack is one way to providesufficient local stress concentration. Cottrell [24] postulated that microcracks form at intersectingC le a va g eFIGURERiver patterns in an A 508 Class 3 steel. Note the tearing (light areas) between parallel cleavageplanes. Photograph courtesy of Mr. Sun Yongqi.

Fracture Behavior withCheese3/6Running the Lab:1)H a v e th e s tu d e n ts sit in p a irs a t th e ir sta tio n s. E xp la in th e y w ill b e h a n d lin g ch e e se . O ffe r g lo ve s to th o se w h oa re la cto se in to le ra n t o r w o u ld p re fe r n o t to h a n d le ch e e se w ith th e ir b a re h a n d s.2)T h e y sh o u ld h a ve a lre a d y a n s w e re d th e p re -la b q u e stio n s. A sk th e stu d e n ts if th e y h a d a n y u n re so lve dq u e stio n s a b o u t th e p re -la b q u e s tio n s .3)In s tru ct th e stu d e n ts to re a d a ll o f th e d ire c tio n s .4)D o n o t g iv e th e m th e in stru c tio n s ve rb a lly . T h e g o a l is to g e t th e stu d e n ts to re a d e ve ryth in g a n d th in k a b o u tw h y th e y a re d o in g w h a t th e y a re d o in g . A t th is p o in t le t th e m ju m p in b u t e n co u ra g e th e m to ra ise th e ir h a n d sif th e y h a ve q u e stio n s .Expected Results from Three-point Bend Tests:W e p ro vid e stu d e n ts w ith m o re th a n o n e o f th e sa m e g e o m e try b e ca u se th e re a re o fte n d e fe cts th a t im p a ct th ew a y th e sp e c im e n s fa il. B y in sp e ctin g m o re th a n o n e sp e c im e n , stu d e n ts ca n a lso e xp lo re th e re a l-life va ria b ilityo f fa ilu re a n a lysis. T h e c h a rt b e lo w is co m p le te d to p ro vid e th e in stru cto rs w ith so m e in sig h t a b o u t b o th typ e s o fch e e se in e a ch g e o m e try; h o w e v e r, s tu d e n ts w o u ld o n ly b e w o rkin g w ith o n e typ e a t a tim e . T h e e xa m p le s b e lo wd o n o t in clu d e a n y d e scrip tio n s o f in te rg ra n u la r fra ctu re . W e h a ve fo u n d th a t th e se ch e e se s (e .g . fe ta o r C o lb yja c k) ca n b e a little fru stra tin g fo r stu d e n ts. In ste a d , w e su g g e st th a t yo u p ro vid e a fe w e xa m p le s to d e m o n stra tein te rg ra n u la r fra ctu re .S a m p leC ra c k n u c le a tio nS h a rp n o tc h # 1(for Extra SharpCheddar)S h a rp n o tc h # 2(for Muenster)C ra c k p ro p a g a tio n(S tra ig h t o r zig -za g ? )(D u c tile F ra c tu re , C le a v a g e o rIn te rg ra n u la r? )The crack shouldstart directly from theMost cracks will propagatedirectly across the specimen (i.e.Extra sharp cheddar should demonstratecleavage-like behavior with signaturesharp notch.straight)“river-pattern” markingsThe crack shouldstart directly from thesharp notch.Most cracks will propagate at anangle to the original notch ( 45º).Often this results in a morejagged or zig-zag propagationpath.B lu n t n o tch # 1(for Extra SharpCheddar)F ra c tu re s u rfa c eThe crack is stillexpected to startfrom the notch.While there may be morevariation than found with thesharp cracks, most will stillpropagate straight across theMuenster cheese typically displaysductile fracture behavior. The zig-zagcrack path and void formation ahead ofthe crack are signatures of this.The fracture surface should still havesignatures of brittle cleavage fracture.specimen.B lu n t n o tch # 2(for Muenster)The crack may startat the notch, but isjust as likely to startsomewhere else.This crack path is still likely to bezig-zaggy, but will also be themost unpredictable.N o n o tc hFor either type ofcheese, without anotch, the crack canstart anywhere.Without a pre-notch, the crack ismuch more difficult to predict andthe students will likely have toapply more force to initiate one.Still ductile fracture.This will depend on the type of cheese,but the signatures of fracture should bethe same as observed with the prenotched samples.Discussion Points:1) What does your fracture surface look like for each cheese? For each type of notch?2) Did all of your samples fail the same way? Can you rationalize why or why not?

Fracture Behavior withCheese4/6You Will Be Able To:1)2)Explain why geometry is important to fracture behaviorJustify you experimental observations of fractured cheeseSimulations of Stress in CheeseYou’ve seen how cheeses break when they have different initial crack geometries. Now you’lluse some computer software called OOF2 to get an idea for how the initial geometriesconcentrate stress in different locations and cause different kinds of fractures. Each group willbe assigned to simulate a different initial fracture geometry (due to time constraints), whichyou will present at the end. What you will see once you have finished the simulation is a visualrepresentation of where stress builds up in the cheese as it is initially strained (as you strainedit, using the three-point method.)Notes to the instructor: Nanohub, and OOF2 especially, can be kind of finicky.Try to use a browser with javascript support (Safari and Firefox are usually better thanChrome), and if the display cuts out, try refreshing the page before assuming theworst. Sometimes it really will just break for no adequately explained reason and thesimulation will have to be rerun (this is the case if there’s a connection error of some kind, inour experience.)If refreshing the page doesn’t work you can try going to the student’s “dashboard” andlaunching from currently-running sessions.One other thing to note is that some of these simulations could take 5-10 minutes to fully setup and solve, especially ones with more complex meshes (kinked crack in particular.)If the particular crack file will not load correctly just have them run a different crack.

Fracture Behavior withCheese5/6Example Solution Images:These won’t look identical from group to group because there are random stepsin the OOF2 setup, but they should be a solid guide for what to look at. Note thatif they don’t uncheck their original image file, their images may not appear tohave as much contrast as these do. Also, generally these can be most easilycreated by just screenshotting the Nanohub images. Note also that the scaleson the color bars are different, which may be relevant.Blunt CrackCenter CrackNarrow Crack

Fracture Behavior withCheese6/6Example Solution Images (cont.)No Crack No crack: the color variations are just noise as thewhole field is subjected to a uniform stress Blunt crack: smallest range of tensile tocompressive stresses, with the most gradualchanges between contours – likely to result inmore ductile fracture at higher loads Center crack: much larger range of stress andmuch more localized Narrow crack: highly localized fields at the crack tip,the crack tip radius and the loading direction themost relevant parametersDiscussion Points:What you are looking at is a scaled color map of the stress intensities at various locationsaround an initial fracture shape (or no shape, if you are simulating without an initial crack)1) Can you link this picture to one of the fracture behaviors you observed when you werebreaking the cheese? Is this the picture you would expect?See summary above for description and rational of stress concentration fields. When acrack propagates: no crack will nucleate and fail at random points along the specimen; blunt crack is likely to have a zig-zag crack path (ductile tearing, especially in the“softer” cheese); center crack should propagate on the tensile side of the bending specimen first, butif loaded in pure tension (as demonstrated in this simulation) both sides should failsimultaneously in much the same way that the sharp crack would although atdifferent loads narrow crack should propagate in a zig-zag pattern for softer cheese and in astraight path perpendicular to the crack tip for harder cheese2) What kind of fracture behavior do you think you have modeled? Explain.As noted above, this depends not only on the crack geometry but also on the stiffness3) Compare your simulation results to the results of the other groups. From the simulationsand the experiments, how does initial geometry play a role in crack propagation?Guide the campers towards the conclusions noted above

tetrahedron. Please explain why cheese fracture fits in these categories. Cheese fits into the structure and properties categories because the type of bonding in the cheese affects the way it fractures, which is a mechanical property. 2) Match the type of fracture to its fracture surface Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications

Related Documents:

A.2 ASTM fracture toughness values 76 A.3 HDPE fracture toughness results by razor cut depth 77 A.4 PC fracture toughness results by razor cut depth 78 A.5 Fracture toughness values, with 4-point bend fixture and toughness tool. . 79 A.6 Fracture toughness values by fracture surface, .020" RC 80 A.7 Fracture toughness values by fracture surface .

Fracture Liaison/ investigation, treatment and follow-up- prevents further fracture Glasgow FLS 2000-2010 Patients with fragility fracture assessed 50,000 Hip fracture rates -7.3% England hip fracture rates 17% Effective Secondary Prevention of Fragility Fractures: Clinical Standards for Fracture Liaison Services: National Osteoporosis .

Cheese: aged 1 mo , dry curd cottage cheese, yogurt cheese/labneh Ghee Sour Cream: homemade 24 hour Yogurt: homemade 24 hour Cream: lactase-treated ¼ cup Milk: 100% Lactose-Free commercial Yogurt: lactose-free commercial (pectin) Cheese: cream cheese, cottage cheese, fresh cheese (feta, cheve, fresh mozzarella), ricotta Kefir: commercial,

This article shows how the fracture energy of concrete, as well as other fracture parameters such as the effective length of the fracture process zone, critical crack-tip opening displacement and the fracture toughness, can be approximately predicted from the standard . Asymptotic analysis further showed that the fracture model based on the .

hand, extra-articular fracture along metaphyseal region, fracture can be immobilized in plaster of Paris cast after closed reduction [6, 7]. Pin and plaster technique wherein, the K-wire provides additional stability after closed reduction of fracture while treating this fracture involving distal radius fracture.

6.4 Fracture of zinc 166 6.5 River lines on calcite 171 6.6 Interpretation of interference patterns on fracture surfaces 175 6.6.1 Interference at blisters and wedges 176 6.6.2 Interference at fracture surfaces of polymers that have crazed 178 6.6.3 Transient fracture surface features 180 6.7 Block fracture of gallium arsenide 180

Fracture is defined as the separation of a material into pieces due to an applied stress. Based on the ability of materials to undergo plastic deformation before the fracture, two types of fracture can be observed: ductile and brittle fracture.1,2 In ductile fracture, materials have extensive plastic

4 Palash Hindi Pathya Pustak 8 Rohan 5 Amrit Sanchey (H)(Premchand Stories) Saraswati 6 Gulmohar Hindi Vyakaran 8 Full Circle 7 Maths 8 NCERT 8 Maths (RS Aggarwal) 8 Bharti Bhawan 9 Science 8 NCERT 10 Activity Plus In Prac Science 7 Full Marks 11 History 8 NCERT 12 Geography 8 NCERT 13 Civics 8 NCERT 14 Maps (I Pol/10, W Pol/10)(20) 15 Oxford School Atlas (B/F) OUP 16 Cyber Beans 8 Kips 17 .