Phys 401 Spring 2021 Lecture #1 Summary 25 January, 2021

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
371.58 KB
10 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Averie Goad
Transcription

Phys 401Spring 2021Lecture #1 Summary25 January, 2021Welcome to Phys 401! It should be an exciting and action-packed semester as we delveinto the fascinating topic of Quantum Mechanics. Please do Homework 0 to review the math skillsthat you will need for this class. Note that we will move at a faster pace, and work at a higherlevel, than we did in Phys 371. I will skip many mathematical steps during the lectures (e.g.integration by parts, solving standard equations, performing algebraic simplifications, etc.), andyou should go back and supply these missing steps when you review your notes.We began by reviewing key ideas from Phys 371 β€œModern Physics”. The first big step inquantum mechanics came about from trying to understand the radiation emitted by blackbodyradiators. These are objects at some temperature 𝑇𝑇 that emit radiation over a broad range ofwavelengths, and their emission properties are independent of material. It was found empiricallythat the total radiated power of such an object is given by the Stefan-Boltzmann law: 𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 πœŽπœŽπ‘‡π‘‡ 4 , where 𝑅𝑅𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 is the total radiated power per unit area of the object, having units ofStefan constant is 5.6703 10 8π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘šπ‘š 2 𝐾𝐾4π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘šπ‘š 2. The, and 𝑇𝑇 is the absolute temperature in Kelvin. Theradiated power is spread out over a broad range of wavelengths as shown below. The wavelengthπœ†πœ†π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š of the peak radiated power is related to the temperature of the blackbody as πœ†πœ†π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š 1/𝑇𝑇.The Wein displacement law says that πœ†πœ†π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š 𝑇𝑇 2.898 10 3 π‘šπ‘š 𝐾𝐾. This empirical result turnedout to be a key observation for the development of the photon theory of light.1

A blackbody radiator is realized by creating a box with interior walls at temperature 𝑇𝑇. Theenergy density of the radiation in the box is given by 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†), which has units of Energy/(VolumeWavelength), or 𝐽𝐽/(π‘šπ‘š3 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛). This is an energy density, both in terms of per unit volume, andper unit wavelength. If there is a small hole in one wall of the box that lets some of the radiation𝑐𝑐to escape, the radiated power at wavelength πœ†πœ† is given by 𝑅𝑅(πœ†πœ†) 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†), where 𝑐𝑐 is the speed of4light. Hence the radiated power gives direct insight in to the energy density of radiation in thebox. Blackbody radiators are commercially available. The sun acts as a blackbody radiationsource to good approximation, at least when its 𝑅𝑅(πœ†πœ†) spectrum is measured outside the Earth’satmosphere.The classical explanation was that 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†) 𝑛𝑛(πœ†πœ†)π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇, where 𝑛𝑛(πœ†πœ†)𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 is the number ofelectromagnetic modes with wavelengths between πœ†πœ† and πœ†πœ† 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 per unit volume inside the box.This quantity 𝑛𝑛(πœ†πœ†) 8πœ‹πœ‹πœ†πœ†4is derived here. The factor of π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇 comes from the statistical mechanicsidea of β€œequipartition of energy,” which says that every degree of freedom of the system acquiresπ‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇/2 of energy in equilibrium. This idea is very successful in the thermodynamics of ideal gases3(where it predicts the internal energy π‘ˆπ‘ˆ π‘π‘π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇), but it is a disaster for light in a box. It predicts2the Rayleigh-Jeans law 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†) 8πœ‹πœ‹π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇/πœ†πœ†4 , which suffers from the β€œultraviolet catastrophe” in thatit predicts an infinite energy density in the wavelength going to zero (ultraviolet) limit. Thiscontradicts the experimental situation, as shown in the figure above, where it is seen that 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†) isstrongly suppressed to zero at short wavelengths. Houston, we have a problem!To address this problem Planck made two (unjustified and revolutionary) assumptions:0) The atoms in the walls of the box have electrons, and when these electrons vibrate atfrequency 𝑓𝑓 they emit electromagnetic waves at frequency 𝑓𝑓. Likewise light at frequency𝑓𝑓 can be absorbed by the atoms in the walls and start oscillating at frequency 𝑓𝑓. Inequilibrium there is an equal energy flux from the walls to radiation and from radiationback into the walls.1) The atoms in the walls of the box have discrete energy levels given by 𝐸𝐸𝑛𝑛 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛, where𝑛𝑛 0, 1, 2, Hence the atoms can only interact with light of energy πœ€πœ€, 2πœ€πœ€, 3πœ€πœ€, etc.2) The energy of light is directly related to the frequency of oscillation of the EM fields asπœ€πœ€ β„Žπ‘“π‘“, where β„Ž is a fudge factor with units of 𝐽𝐽/𝐻𝐻𝐻𝐻 or 𝐽𝐽 𝑠𝑠. Surprisingly, this energy isindependent of the intensity of the light.Planck then adopted an assumption from statistical mechanics about the likelihood of findingan atom in the walls of the box being excited to energy state 𝐸𝐸, assuming the walls are inequilibrium with the radiation field at temperature 𝑇𝑇. It is given by the Maxwell-Boltzmann factorat temperature 𝑇𝑇: 𝑔𝑔(𝐸𝐸 ) 𝐴𝐴𝑒𝑒 𝐸𝐸/π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇 , where 𝐴𝐴 is a normalization factor. Here 𝑔𝑔(𝐸𝐸 ) is the fractionof atoms in the wall of the box that are excited to a state of energy 𝐸𝐸. Note the negative exponential2

dependence on the ratio of the energy of the atom 𝐸𝐸 to the thermal energy π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇. This means thatit will be very unlikely to find atoms occupying energy states with 𝐸𝐸 π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇, which in turn meansthat electromagnetic modes of the box at that energy (which corresponds to a short wavelength)will have a very low probability of occupation, which will fix the ultraviolet catastrophe. Theresulting Planck blackbody radiation formula is 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†) 8πœ‹πœ‹β„Žπ‘π‘/πœ†πœ†5𝑒𝑒 β„Žπ‘π‘/πœ†πœ†π‘˜π‘˜π΅π΅ 𝑇𝑇 1. This function has the propertythat in the ultraviolet limit (πœ†πœ† 0) it goes to zero exponentially fast, thus avoiding the ultravioletcatastrophe. To fit the blackbody emission data for 𝜌𝜌(πœ†πœ†) one has to choose a fudge factor of β„Ž 6.626 10 34 𝐽𝐽 𝑠𝑠, which is known today as Planck’s constant.The photoelectric effect involves ultraviolet light impinging on a clean metal surface andliberating photoelectrons. The parameters are the intensity 𝐼𝐼 and frequency 𝑓𝑓 of the light, and themaximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, and the metal used for the photo-cathode. Anumber of observations were made about this effect (see the experimental setup below):1) A positive anode (collector) voltage resulted in a steady photocurrent 𝑖𝑖.2) The magnitude of the photocurrent scales with the light intensity 𝑖𝑖 𝐼𝐼.3) There was NO lag between the introduction of the light and the onset of photocurrent.Even in situations where the light intensity was so low that classically it would takehours to transfer enough energy to the electrons to begin liberating them from the metal,the first photoelectrons would appear essentially instantaneously after even weak lightwas turned on.4) If the anode (collector) potential was made sufficiently negative the photocurrent wouldcease. This is called the stopping potential 𝑉𝑉0 (with 𝑉𝑉0 0).5) The stopping potential is a measure of the maximum kinetic energy of the liberated1electrons: 𝑒𝑒𝑉𝑉0 π‘šπ‘šπ‘£π‘£ 2 2π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š6) It was found that 𝑉𝑉0 is independent of the light intensity. Classically you would expectthat higher light intensity would result in more energetic photoelectrons, but this is notobserved.7) It was found that changing the frequency of the light would change the stoppingpotential. The higher the frequency of the light, the larger the magnitude of thestopping potential, and a linear (rather than quadratic) relationship was observed.Observations 3, 6 and 7 are clearly at odds with the expectations of classical physics.3

Einstein’s 1905 paper originated the concept of a photon. He was bothered by the fact thatMaxwell’s equations predicted that light energy would continuously decrease to arbitrarily smallamounts as a light sphere around a source expanded outward. He proposed that this energy dilutionstopped when the light energy got down to some minimum quantum of energy. He also expectedthat time-dependent phenomena involving electromagnetic waves (such as the absorption oremission of light) might show new phenomena not described by Maxwell’s equations.Einstein made three proposals, with which he could explain all the experimental results on thephotoelectric effect:1) Adopt the energy quantization idea for electromagnetic fields, as proposed by Planck,namely the energy of the β€œlight particles” is related to the frequency of the EM waves asπΈπΈπ‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™π‘™β„Žπ‘‘π‘‘ β„Žπ‘“π‘“.2) The β€œquantum of light” aka β€œphoton” collides with a single electron in the metal andtransfers all of its energy to the electron at once.3) The energy of the resulting photoelectron is 𝐸𝐸𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃 β„Žπ‘“π‘“ πœ™πœ™, where πœ™πœ™ is the work functionof the metal, and varies from one metal to the next, but is in the range of 2 to 5 eV. Thework function is the binding energy of the electrons in the metal and depends on details.With this proposal, Einstein explained all the observations and made the following prediction.In the limit of low frequency, the photon will not have enough energy to liberate the electronsbecause β„Žπ‘“π‘“ πœ™πœ™. This leads to the threshold frequency 𝑓𝑓𝑑𝑑 πœ™πœ™/β„Ž below which there is nophotocurrent 𝑖𝑖. If one plots the stopping potential 𝑉𝑉0 vs. light frequency 𝑓𝑓 for 𝑓𝑓 𝑓𝑓𝑑𝑑 it shouldobey the photoelectric equation: 𝑉𝑉0 (β„Ž/𝑒𝑒)𝑓𝑓 πœ™πœ™/𝑒𝑒, where the slope of the straight line should4

have a universal value of β„Ž/𝑒𝑒 independent of the metal used in the cathode. This is in agreementwith experiments (see HW 1).Roentgen discovered in 1895 that X-rays are produced when cathode rays (electrons) areproduced with a very high potential ( 104 Volts) and directed in to a metal target. The resultingbremsstrahlung (braking radiation) is an electromagnetic wave. The wavelengths of the resultingelectromagnetic waves are less than 1 nm.X-ray emission has three properties:1) There is a continuous spectrum expected classically from β€œbraking radiation.”2) There are sharp emission lines that appear for sufficiently high accelerating voltages.These lines depend on the type of metal used as a target.3) The continuous spectrum has a sharp cutoff at short wavelengths, found empirically tobe described by the equation πœ†πœ†π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š accelerating voltage of the electrons.1240𝑉𝑉(𝑉𝑉)𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 𝑉𝑉 (Duane-Hunt Rule), where 𝑉𝑉 is theEinstein pointed out that X-ray generation is the inverse of photo-electron emission, andused the photoelectric equation to derive πœ†πœ†π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š β„Žπ‘π‘π‘’π‘’π‘’π‘’ 1239.8𝑉𝑉(𝑉𝑉)𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 𝑉𝑉, in good agreement with theDuane-Hunt Rule. The observed sharp lines are a consequence of the discrete energy levels presentin atoms.Most solid materials are crystalline and are made up of atoms or molecules that areregularly spaced in a periodic array. When x-rays come in to such a crystal structure theyencounter a periodic potential that can give rise to sharp and intense diffracted beams. Thesebeams arise from reflections of electromagnetic waves from parallel planes of atoms that act aspartially reflecting mirrors, and occur when constructive interference occurs in reflection. Afteridentifying a set of parallel planes, one can calculate the constructive interference diffractioncondition by requiring that each wave that penetrates one layer deeper must traverse a distance5

corresponding to an integer number (𝑛𝑛) of additional wavelengths before rejoining the beamreflected from the layer above. This gives rise to the condition that 𝑛𝑛𝑛𝑛 2𝑑𝑑 sin πœƒπœƒ, where 𝑛𝑛 1, 2, 3, , πœ†πœ† is the wavelength of the x-rays, 𝑑𝑑 is the spacing of the parallel planes of atoms, and πœƒπœƒis the angle of incidence of the x-ray beam relative to the parallel planes. This is called Bragg’slaw, and is a consequence of the wave nature of x-rays.We briefly reviewed Compton scattering with an emphasis on the energy and momentumof light particles (photons) involved in the scattering process. X-rays of wavelength πœ†πœ† scatter fromstationary electrons, changing to a longer wavelength πœ†πœ†β€² and moving off in a direction at angle πœƒπœƒrelative to their incident direction. The Compton formula is: πœ†πœ†β€² πœ†πœ† β„Žπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š(1 cos πœƒπœƒ), where β„Ž isPlanck’s constant, π‘šπ‘š is the electron mass, and 𝑐𝑐 is the speed of light in vacuum. The idea thatlight has an energy given by 𝐸𝐸 β„Žπ‘“π‘“, where 𝑓𝑓 is the frequency of oscillation of the electromagneticwaves, and light has a momentum given by 𝒑𝒑 𝑬𝑬𝒄𝒄 𝒉𝒉𝒉𝒉𝒄𝒄𝒉𝒉 β„π’Œπ’Œ, is consistent with ideas𝝀𝝀introduced by Planck and Einstein to explain the blackbody radiation spectrum and the photoelectric effect, respectively. One derives the Compton formula simply by enforcing conservationof energy and momentum for the β€œphoton-electron particle-like collision.” This illustrates theparticle nature of light and further supports the concept of a photon. The fact that light sometimesacts like a wave and sometimes acts like a particle is called β€œwave-particle duality.”The Nuclear AtomAtomic spectroscopy shows that atoms have many discrete spectral lines in emission andabsorption. Each type of atom has its own unique spectrum of lines, a kind of β€œfingerprint.” Itwas found that Hydrogen (and one-electron ions) have the simplest structure of spectral lines.Regularities in the spectral wavelengths were observed involving the inverse squares of integers.For example the Rayleigh-Ritz formula β€˜predicted’ the wavelengths of many spectral lines as1πœ†πœ†π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š 𝑅𝑅 1π‘šπ‘š 2 1𝑛𝑛 2 , where π‘šπ‘š and 𝑛𝑛 are positive integers with 𝑛𝑛 π‘šπ‘š. The factor 𝑅𝑅 is the Rydberg6

constant and has a value of 𝑅𝑅 𝑅𝑅𝐻𝐻 1.096776 1071π‘šπ‘šfor Hydrogen. Heavier single-electronions have slightly larger values of 𝑅𝑅. Where does this regularity in the emission spectrum comefrom?Rutherford scattering (studied carefully in Phys410 Classical Physics) experiments consistof energetic Ξ±-particles (2 protons plus 2 neutrons) being scattered from materials like Au in theform of a thin sheet. It was found that a large number of the Ξ±-particles were scattered straightback, and the angular distribution of the scattering implies that much of the mass of the atom isconcentrated in a single positively charged entity. This entity is the nucleus of course, andRutherford showed that it has a dimension on the scale of 1 fm (10 15 m). The electrons aredistributed more or less uniformly in a cloud outside of the nucleus. This is the origin of thenuclear model of the atom.Neils Bohr developed a planetary model of the Hydrogen atom. One can imagine anelectron in an orbit around the proton in analogy with the earth around the sun. However, inclassical physics charges that accelerate are known to radiate. Thus it was not clear why anelectron in an orbit around the proton would not radiate continuously and spiral into the nucleus.Bohr made three bold postulates:1) Electrons orbit the nucleus in circular orbits called β€œstationary states” and do not radiatewhile in such states.2) Atoms radiate when electrons make transitions between stationary states of differentenergy.3) The angular momentum of electrons in stationary states is quantized in units of ℏ β„Ž/2πœ‹πœ‹.(Here, Planck’s constant appears in an entirely new context, very different from blackbodyradiation!)Bohr then did a β€œsemi-classical” calculation of the Hydrogen atom structure, assuming that theelectron and proton are attracted to each other by the Coulomb interaction. He arrived at thefollowing results:Using Newton’s second law of motion for the bound state of a positively charged nucleus anda single negatively charged electron, he found the speed, angular momentum, and the radius of theelectron orbit, and the total energy of the Hydrogen atom. The speed of the electron in its circular𝑍𝑍𝑒𝑒 2orbit of radius π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿ: 𝑣𝑣 4πœ‹πœ‹πœ€πœ€0 π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š, where the nucleus has charge 𝑍𝑍𝑍𝑍, πœ€πœ€0 is the permittivity of freespace, and π‘šπ‘š is the (reduced) mass of the electron.Now use the third postulate and assume a non-relativistic situation: The angular momentum isquantized as 𝐿𝐿 βƒ— π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿβƒ— π‘šπ‘šπ‘£π‘£βƒ— π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š 𝑛𝑛ℏ, with 𝑛𝑛 1, 2, 3, This leads to the quantized radiiof the Bohr orbits: π‘Ÿπ‘Ÿπ‘›π‘› 𝑛𝑛 2π‘Žπ‘Ž0𝑍𝑍, where π‘Žπ‘Ž0 4πœ‹πœ‹πœ€πœ€0 ℏ2π‘šπ‘šπ‘’π‘’ 27 0.529 β„« is called the Bohr radius. Note that

the Bohr radius expression is made up of only fundamental constants of nature. Hence the structureof the Hydrogen atom is universal and time invariant, as far as we know.The total energy of the hydrogen atom 𝐸𝐸 𝑇𝑇 𝑉𝑉 (𝑇𝑇 is kinetic energy of the electron – theproton is assumed to be stationary, 𝑉𝑉 is the Coulomb potential energy between the electron and𝑍𝑍 2proton) is found to be 𝐸𝐸𝑛𝑛 𝐸𝐸0 𝑛𝑛2 , with 𝐸𝐸0 𝑒𝑒 2 /4πœ‹πœ‹πœ€πœ€0ℏ𝑐𝑐 1137.036π‘šπ‘šπ‘π‘ 2 𝑒𝑒 2 /4πœ‹πœ‹πœ€πœ€0 2 (ℏ𝑐𝑐)22 π‘šπ‘šπ‘π‘ 22𝛼𝛼 2 13.6 𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒, where 𝛼𝛼 is a famous dimensionless constant called the fine structure constant. ForHydrogenic atoms and single-electron ions one has 𝐸𝐸𝑛𝑛 13.6 𝑒𝑒𝑉𝑉 𝑍𝑍 2𝑛𝑛 2, with 𝑛𝑛 1, 2, 3, Why isthe energy negative? Negative energy represents a bound state of the electron and proton. Wedefine the zero of energy to be an electron and proton separated to infinity, with no kinetic energy.A negative energy comes about because the Coulomb attraction of the two particles, plus theirkinetic energy, corresponds to a lower energy state than having the particles at rest separated toinfinity. Also take note that Bohr predicts an infinite number of bound states of a proton andelectron (labelled by the set of all positive integers)!With these energy levels for the β€œstationary states” Bohr could now predict the wavelengthsof light emitted by a hydrogen atom as it made transitions between stationary states. He foundthat1πœ†πœ†π‘–π‘–π‘–π‘– 𝐸𝐸0 𝑍𝑍 2β„Žπ‘π‘ 1𝑛𝑛𝑓𝑓2 1𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖2 , where 𝑖𝑖 and 𝑓𝑓 refer to initial and final states labeled by positive integers𝑛𝑛𝑖𝑖 and 𝑛𝑛𝑓𝑓 , respectively. This explains the discreteness of the spectral lines as well as the regularitynoted in the Hydrogen emission spectrum involving the difference of the inverse squares ofintegers (the Rayleigh-Ritz formula). He thus made a prediction that the Rydberg constant is𝐸𝐸related to fundamental constants of nature as 𝑅𝑅 β„Žπ‘π‘0 measured value.π‘šπ‘šπ‘π‘ 2 𝛼𝛼22β„Žπ‘π‘ 1.098 1071π‘šπ‘š, close to theThe Bohr model is a great accomplishment in understanding the basic structure of theHydrogen atom and its interaction with light. However, it fails to explain the properties of morecomplicated atoms with two or more electrons. Nevertheless there were three pieces ofinformation that suggested more complex atoms also had quantized energy levels:1) All atoms, no matter how many electrons they have, show emission spectra made upof discrete lines.2) The peaks in x-ray emission from metal targets are signs that the innermost electronbound states in heavy atoms (like Cu, Mo, W) have discrete energy levels. Thesedeeply bound electrons with 𝑛𝑛 1 π‘œπ‘œπ‘œπ‘œ 2 essentially behave like hydrogen atoms withlarge 𝑍𝑍 (like 29, 42, 74). Thus the binding energy is enhanced by a factor of 𝑍𝑍 2 , whichcan be thousands of electron volts. When high-voltage electrons collide with theseatoms in an x-ray target they can knock out these β€œinner shell” electrons. The relaxationof the atom to fill that electron vacancy produces characteristic emission lines that show8

up in the x-ray emission spectrum. This was systematically explored by Moseley, whoused the Bohr model combined with x-ray emission peaks to predict the existence of 3new elements (Tc, Pm and Re).3) Inelastic electron scattering from Hg atoms (𝑍𝑍 80) showed that the Hg atom had anexcited state 4.9 eV higher than the ground state. This is the Franck-Hertz experiment.This experiment also showed that ultraviolet light with a wavelength corresponding toan energy difference of 4.9 eV was emitted by the Hg gas only when the acceleratingpotential of the electrons exceeded 4.9 eV, making a direct connection between thediscrete energy levels measured by inelastic electron scattering and by light emission.At this point it became clear that some new thinking was required to understand thestructure of atoms. The three Bohr postulates are largely at odds with classical thinking, makingthe whole exercise somewhat dubious. It required a revolution in thinking about the nature ofmatter to make any further progress.So far we have seen that light sometimes acts like a wave (e.g. x-ray scattering from parallelplanes of atoms giving rise to bright diffraction peaks due to constructive interference – Braggscattering), and sometimes like a particle (e.g. an x-ray having a collision with a st

Spring 2021 . Lecture #1 Summary . 25 January, 2021 . Welcome to Phys 401! It should be an exciting and action-packed semester as we delve into th e fascinating topic of Quantum M echanics. Please do Homework 0 to review the math skills that you will need for this class. Note

Related Documents:

Tee - Reducing (continued) Socket x Socket x Socket 401-422 4X3 6 0 040 77.83 401-4261 4X6 4 0 040 419.22 401-4281 4X8 2 0 040 1157.12 401-4861 5X2 5 0 040 182.51 401-4871 5X2-1/2 4 0 040 200.79 401-488 5X3 4 0 040 182.51 401-490 5X4 3 0 040 182.51 401-4921 5X6 4 0 040 428.13 401-4941 5X8 1 2 040 1472.94 401-5261 6X1-1/4 6 0 040 267.96 401-5271 .

Credit is not given for both PHYS 102 and either PHYS 212 or PHYS 214. Prerequisite: PHYS 101. This course satisfies the General Education Criteria for: Nat Sci Tech - Phys Sciences . Credit or concurrent registration in PHYS 212. PHYS 246 Physics on the Silicon Prairie: An Introduction to Modern Computational Physics credit: 2 Hours. (https .

Introduction of Chemical Reaction Engineering Introduction about Chemical Engineering 0:31:15 0:31:09. Lecture 14 Lecture 15 Lecture 16 Lecture 17 Lecture 18 Lecture 19 Lecture 20 Lecture 21 Lecture 22 Lecture 23 Lecture 24 Lecture 25 Lecture 26 Lecture 27 Lecture 28 Lecture

ENTM 20600 General Entomology & ENTM 20700 General Entomology Lab PHYS 17200 Modern Mechanics PHYS 21800 General Physics I PHYS 21900 General Physics II PHYS 22000 General Physics PHYS 22100 General Physics PHYS 24100 Electricity & Optics PHYS 27200 Electric & Magnetic Interactions

Letter to the Editor L541 Herrick D R 1976 J. Chem. Phys. 65 3529 Killingbeck J 1977 Rep. Prog. Phys. 40 963 Koch P M 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 99 Littman M G, Kash M M and Kleppner D 1978 Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 103 Ortolani F and Turchetti G 1978 J. Phys. B: Atom.Molec. Phys. 11 L207 Reinhardt W P 1976 Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 10 359 Silverstone H J 1978 Phys. Rev.

college biol 107 & 108 chem 101 chem 161 phys 124 & 126 bioch 200 langara college biol 1115 & 1125 or biol 1115 & 1215 chem 1120 chem 2316 phys 1125 & phys 1225 biol 2315 biol 2415 not equivalent biol 1190 and biol 1191 laurentian biol 1506 e & biol 1507 e chmi 1006 e or chmi 1007 e chmi 2426 e or chmi 2427 e phys 1006 e & phys 1007 e phys .

PHYS 0160 Introduction to Relativity, Waves and Quantum Physics 1 or PHYS 0060 Foundations of Electromagnetism and Modern Physics PHYS 0470 Electricity and Magnetism 1 PHYS 0500 Advanced Classical Mechanics 1 PHYS 1410 Quantum Mechanics A 1 PHYS 1530 Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics 1 S

xeach gene is a section of DNA with a specific sequence of bases that acts as the 'instructions' or code for the production of a specific protein. xthe human genome has 20 000-25 000 genes xthe average gene has about 3000 bases xthe genes make up only 2%* of the human genome; the rest of the DNA is