PRONUNCIATION AND INTELLIGIBILITY: ISSUES IN RESEARCH AND .

3y ago
34 Views
2 Downloads
3.38 MB
216 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Kaleb Stephen
Transcription

PRONUNCIATION ANDINTELLIGIBILITY:ISSUES IN RESEARCH AND PRACTICEPROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ANNUAL PRONUNCIATION INSECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHINGCONFERENCEEditorsJohn LevisKimberly LeVelle

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe papers in this volume were presented at the Pronunciation in Second Language Learning andTeaching conference held at Iowa State University on September 10 – 11 of 2010.We thank Murray J. Munro, the invited speaker, for his enthusiastic participation. We also thankthe Intensive English and Orientation Program as well as the Department of English at IowaState University for their financial support.Copyright for abstracts and papers written for the Second Annual Conference on Pronunciationin Second Language Learning and Teaching (PSLLT) is retained by the individual author/s, whoshould be contacted for permission by those wishing to use the materials for purposes other thanthose in accordance with fair use provisions of U.S. Copyright Law.2011TESL/Applied LinguisticsIowa State UniversityPronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teachingi

PRONUNCIATION AND INTELLIGIBILITY: ISSUES IN RESEARCH ANDPRACTICEProceedings of the2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching ConferenceSeptember 10-11, 2010Iowa State UniversityPronunciation and Intelligibility: An Overview of the ConferenceJohn Levis and Kimberly LeVelle . 1Listener Reactions to Accented SpeechIntelligibility: Buzzword or buzzworthy? (Plenary)Murray Munro . . 7(Un)Intelligibility TalesLaura Hahn and Patricia Watts. 17The Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit: The Case of Arabic-Accented EnglishGhazi Algethami, John Ingram, and Thu Nguyen . 30Language and Nonlanguage Factors Affecting Nonnative Undergraduate Students’ Reaction toITAsEdna Lima . 43Assessing Speech Intelligibility: Experts Listen to Two StudentsJohn Levis . 56Pedagogical ApproachesUpstream DestressingWayne Dickerson . 70ESL Teachers and Pronunciation Pedagogy: Exploring the Development of Teachers' Cognitionsand Classroom PracticesAmanda Baker. 82An Integrated Approach to Pronunciation: Listening Comprehension and Intelligibility in Theoryand PracticeMarnie Reed and Christine Michaud . 95Pronunciation Learning Strategies that Improve ESL Learners’ LinkingVeronica G. Sardegna . 105Pronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teachingii

Using Mobile Technologies for Synchronous CMC to Develop L2 Oral ProficiencySarah Huffman . 122Acquisition and DescriptionThe Pronunciation of /s/ in Complex Onset and Coda Clusters in Somali-Accented EnglishEttien Koffi. 130Acquisition of L2 Phonology in Advanced Learners: Does Instruction Make a Difference?Anita Saalfeld. 144Vowel Spaces in Bilingual Haitian American KindergartnersStacey Wallen and Robert Fox . 153The Impact of Computer Assisted Pronunciation Training on the Improvement of VietnameseLearner Production of English Syllable MarginsPamela Pearson, Lucy Pickering, and Rachel DaSilva . 169Students’ Awareness of Spanish Spirantization Allophonic RulesManuela González-Bueno and Marcela Quintana-Lara . 180Computer Assisted Pronunciation Learning of French /u/ and /y/ at the Intermediate LevelViviane Ruellot. 199Pronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teachingiii

Levis, J. & LeVelle, K. (2011). Pronunciation and intelligibility: An overview of the conference. In. J. Levis & K.LeVelle (Eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and TeachingConference, Sept. 2010. (pp. 1-6), Ames, IA: Iowa State University.PRONUNCIATION AND INTELLIGIBILITY:AN OVERVIEW OF THE CONFERENCEJohn Levis, Iowa State UniversityKimberly LeVelle, Iowa State UniversityA generally accepted goal of pronunciation pedagogy is to help learners achieve a comfortablyintelligible pronunciation rather than a native-like one. But what should this goal look like in thekinds of research studies we conduct, in our classroom practice, and in the creation of self-studyand computer assisted pronunciation materials? Which elements of pronunciation are mostimportant in achieving a comfortably intelligible pronunciation? What principles can helpteachers make decisions regarding intelligibility?The 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference was held at IowaState University on September 10-11, 2010 with the goal of exploring some of these questions.Research was presented that concerned not only English pronunciation, but also Spanish, Frenchand Chinese pronunciation, providing a valuable forum for bringing together researchers indifferent areas who have common concerns. To give a flavor of the overall variety of theconference sessions, the conference schedule is reproduced below. Those sessions that are inbold are included in the Proceedings.2010 Conference ScheduleFriday, September 109:00 a.m.Intelligibility talesLaura Hahn and Patricia Watts (University of Illinois)9:30 a.m.The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit: The case of Arabicaccented EnglishGhazi Algethami (University of York, UK)10:00 a.m.Integrated pronunciation: Listening comprehension andintelligibility in theory and practiceMarnie Reed (Boston University)10:30 a.m.Break10:50 a.m.The pronunciation of /z/ in coda clusters in Somali-accented EnglishEttien Koffi (St. Cloud State University)11:20 a.m.The role of word familiarity and word context on English vowelintelligibilityRon Thomson (Brock University, Canada)11:50 a.m.Don’t take that tone: Critical errors in lexical tone acquisitionAlina Twist, Alison Blodgett, Jessica Bauman, Melissa Fox, AntonRitting, Matt Winn (University of Maryland CASL)

John Levis & Kimberly LeVellePronunciation and Intelligibility12:20 p.m.Pronunciation learning strategies that improve ESL learners’linkingVeronica Sardegna (University of Texas at Austin)12:50 p.m.Lunch2:15 p.m.[Plenary]Intelligibility: Buzzword or buzzworthy?Murray Munro (Simon Fraser University, Canada)3:30 p.m.Destressing: Another step toward natural speechWayne Dickerson (University of Illinois)4:00 p.m.Pronunciation pedagogy: An exploration of teacher learning andclassroom practicesAmanda Baker (Georgia State University)4:30 p.m.Towards more effective L2 pronunciation instruction: Maximizingaccuracy and oral fluencyBertha Chela-Flores (Universidad Simon Bolivar, Venezuela)6:30-9:00 p.m.Conference dinnerSaturday, September 119:00 a.m.The role of technology in pronunciation teaching: The use ofbiovisual feedback in improving Vietnamese learners’ production ofEnglish syllable marginsLucy Pickering (Texas A & M), Pamela Pearson & Rachel DaSilva (Georgia State University)9:30 a.m.Where is intelligibility in machine recognition of non-native speech?Brian Teaman (Osaka JoGakuin College, Japan)10:00 a.m.Computer-assisted pronunciation learning of French /u/ and /y/ atthe intermediate levelViviane Ruellot (Western Michigan University)10:30 a.m.Break10:50 a.m.L2 speakers’ impressions of the roles of accent and intelligibility afterseven years in an ESL environmentTracey Derwing (University of Alberta, Canada)11:20 a.m.Acquisition of L2 phonology in advanced learners: Does instructionmake a difference?Anita Saalfeld (University of Nebraska-Omaha)Pronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teaching2

John Levis & Kimberly LeVellePronunciation and Intelligibility11:50 a.m.Empowering students to develop their own voice: An achievable goalJoanna Smith (Unitec, New Zealand)12:45 p.m.Lunch1:45 p.m.PostersThe perception and production of English word-final alveo-palatals byKorean L1 learners of EnglishAmanda Huensch (University of Illinois)Funny marks in French? C-cédilles and first semester learnersJessica Sturm (Purdue University)Vowel production abilities of Haitian-American childrenStacy Wallen (Georgia State University) & Robert Fox (Ohio StateUniversity)Students’ awareness of Spanish spirantization allophonic ruleManuela Gonzalez-Bueno & Marcela Quintana-Lara (Universityof Kansas)Intelligibility in second language communication: A two-way streetNicole Eustice (University of Iowa)Nonlanguage factors affecting nonnative undergraduate students’reaction to ITAsEdna Lima (Iowa State University)The acquisition of aspiration in Serbian EFL learnersBiljana Cubrovic (University of Belgrade, Serbia)Using mobile technologies for synchronous CMC to develop L2 oralproficiencySarah Huffman (Iowa State University)3:00-4:30 p.m.Interactive panel discussionWhat really affects and improves intelligibility?Moderated by John Levis5:45-8:30ReceptionThe papers in the proceedings are divided into three sections that have broadly similar themes.There are five papers in the first section, all generally related to Listener Reactions to AccentedSpeech, including discussions of intelligibility and sociolinguistic reactions such as irritation.The second section also includes 5 papers and is titled Pedagogical Approaches. Finally, the lastsection includes six papers on the general theme of Pronunciation Acquisition and Description.Pronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teaching3

John Levis & Kimberly LeVellePronunciation and IntelligibilityListener Reactions to Accented SpeechThe first section, Listener Reactions to Accented Speech, starts with the plenary address byMurray Munro of Simon Fraser University. “Intelligibility: Buzzword or buzzworthy?”examines the contention put forth in an opinion article in Applied Linguistics (Rajogapolan,2010) that intelligibility is a politically charged concept that sounds good but is ultimatelycounterproductive in relation to research and teaching. Munro provides evidence thatintelligibility has a long history both in and outside of linguistics, and that intelligibility is alsoan issue that has real-world implications in fields as diverse as aviation and public serviceencounters.In “(Un)Intelligibility Tales,” Laura Hahn and Patricia Watts discuss narratives provided byteachers and students about times they experienced loss of intelligibility. Most describedexchanges involving NS-NNS interactions or those between two NSs. They analyze theexchanges according to the features of the speech exchange that caused the loss of intelligibility,how the confusion was repaired, and the role context played in remedying the loss.Ghazi Algethami, John Ingram, and Thu Nguyen, in “The interlanguage speech intelligibilitybenefit: the case of Arabic-accented English,” looked at the Interlanguage Speech IntelligibilityBenefit, the hypothesized intelligibility advantage L2 listeners have over native listeners whenthey listen to speakers who share their native language. They found no significant differencebetween L1 Arabic speakers and native English speaking listeners when listening to Arabicaccented speech. They interpret these findings in light of previous findings and suggest thatphonetic features of L2 speech more strongly influence listeners’ perceptions than nativelanguage.In “Language and Nonlanguage Factors Affecting Nonnative Undergraduate Students’ Reactionto ITAs,” Edna Lima investigated the perceptions of international undergraduate studentstoward international teaching assistants (ITAs). In a matched-guise study, students enrolled infirst-year composition classes watched a short video-taped lecture with three guises. Significantresults were found for accent and speaker likeability.Finally, John Levis provides a collection of themes that arose during a panel discussion ofpronunciation experts from around the world in “Assessing Speech Intelligibility: Experts Listento Two Students.” The panel and audience listened to recordings of the English free speech andread speech of two students, a Spanish speaker and a Korean speaker. Panelists discussed theissues that affected the speech intelligibility of the two students. Four themes are examined:The role of listeners’ experience, the features that most impacted intelligibility, the tendency toattribute loss of understanding to accent regardless of the true cause, and the problems withassessing using tasks that employ read speech.Pedagogical ApproachesThe second section of the proceedings includes a variety of papers that address pedagogicalconcerns. In “Upstream Destressing,” Wayne Dickerson argues that destressing, a well-attestedfeature of English pronunciation after the sentence focus, also occurs in phrases in which two orPronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teaching4

John Levis & Kimberly LeVellePronunciation and Intelligibilitymore strongly stressed syllables precede the sentence focus. He discusses how de-stressing thestrongly stressed syllable immediately preceding the focus provides an environment in which thefocused syllable can be heard more clearly and provides pedagogical suggestions for making useof this pattern in teaching focus.Amanda Baker discusses how teachers’ knowledge and beliefs develop and the ways in whichthose beliefs affect their classroom practice in “ESL Teachers and Pronunciation Pedagogy:Exploring the Development of Teachers' Cognitions and Classroom Practices.” She examinesthe cognitions and practices of five experienced ESL teachers and finds that training inpronunciation pedagogy strongly affects not what they know but their confidence. In addition,their own language learning background, teaching experience and work with other teachersinfluence their approach to pronunciation.In “An Integrated Approach to Pronunciation: Listening Comprehension and Intelligibility inTheory and Practice,” Marnie Reed and Christina Michaud argue that the relationshipbetween speaking and listening should be understood in terms of an auditory feedback loop, inwhich production facilitates perception. Four components are proposed for pronunciationteaching to accompany and reinforce other elements of language teaching: connected speech,suprasegmentals, inflectional morphology, and segmentals. Suggestions are given for what suchan approach might look like in the classroom.Veronica G. Sardegna, in “Pronunciation learning strategies that improve ESL learners’linking,” explores how teaching pronunciation learning strategies improved linking within andacross words. Teaching strategies led to initial and long-term improvement for all groups ofstudents. The pronunciation learning strategies that were used are examined in detail andpedagogical implications are given for the use of strategies especially in regard to the teaching oflinking.In “Using Mobile Technologies for Synchronous CMC to Develop L2 Oral Proficiency,” SarahHuffman moves away from a narrow focus on pronunciation to explore how ComputerMediated Communication (CMC) using mobile technologies can help promote oral proficiency.She explores how multimedia mobile technologies have great promise in helping learnersdevelop their L2 oral proficiency. The researcher also provides points to consider to make theimplementation of mobile technologies more successful in teaching L2 oral language andsuggests future research avenues.Pronunciation Acquisition and DescriptionThe last set of papers address descriptions of learner pronunciation and the way pronunciation isacquired. In “The Pronunciation of /s/ in Complex Onset and Coda Clusters in Somali-AccentedEnglish,” Ettien Koffi describes how /s/ in complex onset and coda clusters patterns in thespeech of Somali learners of English, a major immigrant population in Minnesota, a midwesternUS state. He first describes how /s/ contributes to accentedness, and then explains the patternsusing two phonological principles, the Sonority Sequencing Principle and the Coda Condition.Pronunciation for Second Language Learning & Teaching5

John Levis & Kimberly LeVellePronunciation and IntelligibilityAnita Saalfeld analyzes the acquisition of Spanish stress in “Acquisition of L2 phonology inadvanced learners: Does instruction make a difference?” She replicated previous research on theacquisition of Spanish stress with a group of intermediate learners in a Spanish phonetics courseand a control group in another non-phonetics oriented Spanish course. Her results suggest thatwhen students can self-enroll in courses focusing on pronunciation, those who needpronunciation instruction the most are more likely to avoid classes that include phoneticsinstruction.In “Vowel Spaces in Bilingual Haitian American Kindergartners” Stacey Wallen and RobertFox examine the vowels used by monolingual and bilingual Haitian American kindergartners.Because such bilingual speakers are often identified for help with communication disorders whenthey may simply have a communication difference, it is important to identify whether such helpis necessary. They found that vowel production of Haitian American kindergartners differedfrom bilingual Haitians only in production of /o/, and that there were no significant differences inthe vowels of bilingual Haitian American children and native English speaking controls.In “The impact of computer assisted pronunciation training on the improvement of Vietnameselearner production of English syllable margins,” Lucy Pickering, Pam Pearson, and RachelDaSilva look at how computer assisted pronunciation training can be used to improve thepronunciation of Vietnamese learners of English at syllable margins. Thirteen intermediateVietnamese students took part in eight 30-minute tutoring sessions where they used spectrogramsof their own speech to compare their production to the prerecorded spectrograms. Themethodology proposed in the study is put forth as a model for other pedagogical interventionsbased on the reactions of both teachers and students.Manuela González-Bueno and Marcela Quintana-Lara examine the extent to which L2Spanish learners who vary in language proficiency are aware of how Spanish voiced stopsbecome fricatives in particular environments in their paper“Students’ Awareness of SpanishSpirantization Allophonic Rules.” The results indicate that proficiency is strongly related toawareness, with intermediate learners beginning to show awareness, and that the development ofawareness starts earlier for velars and dentals than for bilabials. In production, the sounds notfound in English (velar and bilabial fricatives) were produced more frequently than dentalfricatives (a sound found in English).In “Computer Assisted Pronunciation Learnin

The 2nd Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference was held at Iowa State University on September 10-11, 2010 with the goal of exploring some of these questions. Research was presented that concerned not only English pronunciation, but also Spanish, French

Related Documents:

Different teaching methods have had different opinions about the importance of learning correct pronunciation and about how pronunciation should be taught. See Appendix 1, page 449, for a chart that summarizes various teaching methods’ approaches to teaching pronunciation. What is the main emphasis of pronunciation teaching today?

Therefore, it is essential to design, install and verify sound reinforcement systems properly for intelligibility. In addition, a variety of other applications such as legal and medical applications may require intelligibility verification. Speech communication systems (Public Address Systems) therefore are subject

Chapter 4: Linguistic factors determining mutual intelligibility in the Slavic language . The cloze test in the similar form as the one in the present study has been employed in Gooskens and van Bezooijen (2006). To our knowledge, the spoken version of the cloze test in precisely this form has not been used in intelligibility research before. The four texts used as the cloze test material .

non-native English users. Thus, instead of acquiring native-like pronunciation, ability to pronounce English with received- pronunciation and at least being understood by other English users, called as intelligibility [12,13], become a more viable goal of pronunciation teaching [14] in the recent development of language teaching.

pronunciation teaching for teachers (Teaching Pronunciation). The present project follows on from these projects (the report and two CD-ROMs), and seeks to provide detailed frameworks for teachers to use in working on pronunciation with a range of different ESL learners in a range of different types of situation. Attention

Spelling and Pronunciation Errors in English Language ARTICLE HISTORY Received: 11.01.2017 Revised 01.03.2017 Accepted 03.03.2017 ABSTRACT Pronunciation is the way a word or a langu someone letters a word. A way of speaking a word, especially a way that is accepted or generally understood. Pronunciation is a graphic representation of the way a

Hʘw to Use the Starter Pack This pack contains the following tools for learning English pronunciation: Ebook . The first 20 pages of Pronunciation Studio’s course book ‘The Sound of English Pronunciation’ are included here (pg 2-20), with notes, diagrams, audio and examples for each sound in English. Action Symbʘls

the welfarist objective assumed in modern Mirrleesian theory. In normative terms, the shift from the classical bene–t-based view to the dominant modern approach, which pursues so-called "endowment taxation," is quite substantial. Under the modern approach, an individual s income-earning ability is taken as a given, and as ability makes it .