New Trends In Hospital/Physician Integration

3y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
4.70 MB
203 Pages
Last View : 6d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Grant Gall
Transcription

New Trends inHospital/Physician IntegrationDaniel P. Stech, MBA, CMPEThe Pinnacle Group(303) 801-0130dstech@medbizz.comCurt J. ChaseHusch Blackwell Sanders(816) 983-8254curt.chase@huschblackwell.com

Agenda Drivers of Integration Qualities of Successful Integration New Trends in Integration – Various Structures

INTEGRATED SYSTEMCOMPETITION and STRATEGYECONOMIC and POLICYPRESSURESDEMOGRAPHICTRENDSDrivers of Integration

Key Drivers ofIntegration / Consolidation Economics and Health Policy– Diminished ancillary profitability and growing practice expenses– Evolving reimbursement systems– Downward pressure on compensation Demographics– Physician supply challenges– Physician attitude toward independent practice – continued desirefor some autonomy– Growing uninsured population and high deductible healthinsurance plans Competition and Strategy– Stabilize medical staff– Promote / ensure access– Transform care delivery

Qualities of Successful IntegrationPhysician LeadershipGoals and StrategyShared CultureINTEGRATED SYSTEMCommon LanguageUseable DataShared Risk

Qualities of Successful Integration Physician Leadership– Governance, management and clinical– Shared responsibility Clear Goals and Strategies– Well-defined objectives Shared Culture– Agreed upon responsibilities and behaviorsBreakthroughs: Aligning Hospitals and Physicians Toward Value. HealthLeaders Media, December 2009.

Qualities of Successful Integration Common Language– Physicians and administrators use same manageriallexicon Useable Data– Reliable data on which to create efficiencies andimprove outcomes Shared Risk– Incentives for quality and outcomes– Engage in risk-based reimbursementBreakthroughs: Aligning Hospitals and Physicians Toward Value. HealthLeaders Media, December 2009.

Integration More Considerations Don’t Commit the Sins of the Past– Overpay physicians– Ineffective compensation programs– Unrealistic (and unmonitored) performanceexpectations– Passive practice management– Poor health plan contracting– Exclude physicians from leadership– Select the wrong physicians as partners / employees

Integration More Considerations Do Create the Environment for Success– Establish the organization and expectations beforetaking on physician employment– Be selective / set priorities– Construct compensation programs that promotespecific objectives Be candid about physician retirement strategies– Share control and accountability with physicians Engage physicians in devising your integrationstrategy

Pinnacle Integration Development Map(April 2009)Current EnvironmentIntegrated Environment Copyright 2009. The Pinnacle Group. All rights reserved.

Physician-Hospital Integration ContinuumHospital Systems Continue to Re-Assess the Necessity of Utilizing a Broad Range ofAffiliation Options with Physicians to Advance Their Shared Missions / VisionsMinimalModerateSignificantMajorModelModel 99INTEGRATIONModelModel 88ModelModel 77ModelModel 66ModelModel55ModelModel44ModelModel / n/ t’s not about the model It’s about the al

New Trends in Integration- Various Structures Employment– Traditional– Group Practice Subsidiary– Physician Integration Model Clinical Co-Management Recruitment / Seating Arrangements Management Services Arrangements PSA Models

“Employment” Options Traditional Employment Model: Purchase practice and directly employphysicians by hospital (ancillary services billed by hospital, possibly asprovider based). Cannot give physicians credit for ancillaries. Group Practice Subsidiary Employment Model: Purchase practice andemploy physicians through a subsidiary of hospital (ancillaries billed byhospital or by subsidiary that qualifies as a “group practice” in order toshare ancillaries with physicians). Physician Integration Model: Employment of physicians through agroup practice subsidiary, but instead of purchasing the practice, leaseservices (space, equipment, staff, etc.) from existing practice. Compensation Options: Prefer a physician compensation model thatincludes a productivity component (collections, RVUs) based onpersonally performed services.

Traditional Practice Acquisitionand Employment ModelMDMDHospitalPhysicians becomeemployees of HospitalGroupMDMDMDAssets/StaffMD

Traditional Practice Acquisitionand Employment Model Structure:– Group sells hard assets to hospital at FMV– Physicians become employees of hospital– Staff become employees of hospital Agreements:––––Asset purchase agreementPhysician employment agreementsLease / sublease for spaceLease / sublease of equipment

Traditional Practice Acquisitionand Employment Model Advantages:– Highest level of integration with physicians Disadvantages:–––––Hospital has to come up with capital to buy practiceMDs nervous about selling & losing “control”No physician sharing of ancillary revenuesDifficult to “unwind” if unhappy laterHospitals have traditionally lost money on employedphysicians

Group Practice Subsidiary ModelMDHospitalPayors Group ans become employeesof Hospital subsidiaryMD

Group Practice Subsidiary Model Structure:– New entity that is a subsidiary of Hospital– Physicians become employed by new entity– Operations board is controlled by MDs Agreements:– Employment agreements between Hospitalsubsidiary and physicians– Asset purchase agreement– Organizational / governance documents for newentity including operational and governance policies

Group Practice Subsidiary Model Advantages:– Gives physicians ability to manage the GroupPractice Subsidiary like their own private practice– Allows physicians to share in ancillary revenue Disadvantages:– Must meet “group practice” requirements underStark which has many requirements– Hospital cannot subsidize subsidiary / physicians

Physician Integration ModelHospitalTailored Leasing andMSA ArrangementsEmploymentIntegratedGroup PracticeSubsidiaryGroup #1Division #1MDMDEmploymentPhysician Operating BoardDivision #2MDMDGroup #2

Physician Integration Model Structure:––––New entity (subsidiary of hospital?)Physicians become employed by new entityAn operational board is set upDivisions are established for various groups / specialties Agreements:––––Employment agreements with MDsMSA with practiceLeases with practiceOrganizational / governance documents for new entityincluding operational and governance policies

Physician Integration Model Advantages:– Minimum capital outlay by hospital– Physicians have escape valve– Easier to implement than practice acquisition Disadvantages:– Complex structure to implement– Group / MDs lose payor contracts– Group has no A/R if physicians go back to privatepractice

Clinical Co-Management ModelMDHospitalService Line Management MDGroupMD

Clinical Co-Management Model Structure:– No new structure– Group provides comprehensive management services toHospital for service line Agreements:– Management services agreement Advantages:– Simple way to integrate with Group and work towardcommon goals for service line Disadvantages:– Does not give entrepreneurial group the ability to share inthe revenue stream of the technical services

Recruitment (“Seating”) Model Alternative to Traditional RecruitmentMDHospitalManagement Servicesincluding space, staff, etc. EmploymentMDE’eePhysician physicallyoccupies space inGroup’s officeMDGroupMD

Recruitment (“Seating”) Model –Alternative to Traditional Recruitment Structure:– Hospital employs new recruit and collects for all professional servicesprovided by recruited physician– Group provides management services, space, staff, etc. to Hospital forrecruit in exchange for FMV compensation Agreements:– Employment Agreement between Hospital and recruited physician– Management Services Agreement between Hospital and Group Advantages:– Avoids cumbersome and restrictive recruitment rules (Income guarantee /incremental expense allocation provisions of recruitment exception are notapplicable) Disadvantages:– Recent changes to the Stark laws have made equipment and space leasesin an office-sharing arrangement more difficult

Management Services Agreements –The “New” Under ArrangementsPayorsMDMDOwnership for TC1 for PC2Provider-BasedDepartmentHospitalServices3 41. Hospital bills for the non-professional services (facility or technical charge) athospital rates2. Physician Group bills for the professional services3. Group provides a variety of services (i.e., equipment or staff; supplies;management services)4. Hospital pays Group a FMV rate for each serviceGroupMD

Management ServicesArrangement Model Structure:– Very similar to a more traditional under arrangementsmodel except that Group cannot perform thecomplete service (i.e., cannot provide turn-key cathlab services and sell to Hospital)– Group may provide management services, space,supplies, and either the equipment OR the technicalstaff (but not both) Agreements:– Various leases (space, equipment, staff)– Management service agreement

Management ServicesArrangement Model Advantages:– Option available for restructuring existing underarrangements deals without completely unwinding them– Continues to allow for integration with physicians Disadvantages:– Level of payments to Group through leases andmanagement agreement is not likely going to be at thesame level as what was paid for the entire service in atraditional under arrangements deal– Complex structure to implement and manage

PSA ModelPayorsMDMD for TC1and PC2HospitalProfessional Services3 41. Hospital bills for the non-professional services (facility or technical charge)2. Group / MDs reassign right to bill for the professional services to Hospital3. Group provides professional services to Hospital4. Hospital pays Group an FMV fee for professional servicesGroupMD

PSA Model Structure:– No new structure required– Group / MDs reassign PC to Hospital Agreements:– PSA for services (comp must be structured to meetexceptions/safe harbors & be FMV) Advantages:– Simple to implement because no new legal structure Disadvantages:– Does not necessarily provide level of integration opportunitieshospital or physicians desire– Usually fairly short duration before needing to renegotiate

Questions?

A Former Federal Prosecutor’sViews On HealthcareEnforcement Trends For 2010Stephen L. Hill, Jr.Husch Blackwell Sanders(816) 983-8162stephen.hill@huschblackwell.com

The take-aways for today The federal law enforcement community is still verycommitted to health care as a top priority– We’ll talk about how we know this and what it means The Colorado U.S. Attorney’s Office’s healthcare effortsare led by a very capable Assistant United StatesAttorney– We’ll talk about what this means for you There are a lot of things on your plate, and we’ll talkabout one prioritization approach for you to consider

How does the federal government signal it is stillcommitted to health care enforcement activity?The federal government is very clear about thesignals that it sends: Prosecutions Investigation Civil settlements The resources that it requests and receives fromCongress / the presentations that its representativesmake

Prosecutions(Go with what you are good at doing) Failure to provide service Failure to provide equipment Kickbacks Medically unnecessary

Investigations What would happen if Denver were chosen as the 8thlocation for a Medicare Fraud Strike Force (because theyare adding up to 20)?– Their focus includes allegations of medically unnecessaryprocedures or never provided (rehab has been a big target)– Kickbacks, including recruiting schemes The Air Evac Investigation– False claims (medical supplies never bought) What is your best option for self-disclosure (and how will itplay with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District ofColorado)?

Civil Settlements(the one promoted by DOJ) United States v. Mercy Medical Center - 2.79M forfailure to provide, or failing to demonstrate if providedminimum number of hours of rehab therapy requiredunder Medicare guidelines / self-disclosure / DOJ CivilDivision / OIG United States ex rel. Steve Radojenovich v. WheatonCommunity Hospital - 846,461 to settle allegations thathospital admission practices violated FCA because thehospital knowingly made claims for unreasonable andunnecessary admissions / Qui Tam by physician / DOJCivil Division / USAO Minnesota / OIG

Settlements con’t United States ex rel. Wendy Buterako v. Genesys HealthSystem - 664,413 to settle a lawsuit that alleged thatGenesys overbilled for evaluation and managementservices provided to cardiology patients / Qui Tam / DOJCivil Division / USAO E.D. MI / OIG United States ex rel. v. Visiting Physicians Association 9.5M to settle lawsuit where United States alleged thatassociation violated FCA by submitting claims forunnecessary home visits and care plan oversightservices, for unnecessary tests and procedures, and formore complex evaluation and management services thanwere actually provided / Qui Tam / DOJ Civil DivisionUSAO for S.D. OH and E.D. MI

Settlements con’t United States v. St. John Health System United States ex rel. Keshner v. Nursing PersonnelHome Care, et al., 9.7M settlement of lawsuitsalleging phony training certificates of home health aidesand related billing for the aides’ services / Qui Tam /Commercial Litigation Branch / USAO E.D.N.Y. / OIG /State of New York

Settlements con’t United States ex rel. Tony Kite v. Our Lady of LourdesHealth Care Services, Inc. - 7.95M settlement of 2005lawsuit alleging hospital fraudulently inflated its chargesto obtain enhanced reimbursement for outlier paymentswhen the cases were not extraordinarily costly or outlierpayment should not have been made / Qui Tam / DOJCivil Division / USAO D.N.J. / OIG and FBI United States v. Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic - 3Msettlement for allegations of kickback, includingdisproportionate high ownership interest in HealthSouthjointly owned ambulatory center. Follow-on to 2007HealthSouth settlement.

Settlements con’t Others United States ex rel. Fry v. Health Alliance of GreaterCincinnati (The Christ Hospital of Cincinnati)

Historical SettlementsMemorial Medical Center and Related Physician Groups 5.08M Stark and False Claims settlement in April 2008 Lawsuit began as a whistle-blower claim by a physician thatfocused on:– Payments made by hospital to a non-profit subsidiary thatemployed ophthalmologists– Payments were for production, indigent care, and teachingactivities– However, subsidiary group did not split compensation based onwho performed indigent care and teaching, but instead usedcompensation to retain certain physicians Illustrates increased focus on hospital-employed physicianrelationships and “follows the money” to determine ifcompensation is for actual services rendered

Historical Settlements con’tCardiologists’ Settlement Ongoing investigation of several cardiologists and a New Jerseyhospital’s cardiology program – allegedly a 36M kickback scam Several cardiologists have already settled for multiple times theirannual salary The investigation centers around:– Hospital’s failing cardiology program– Hospital paid 18 cardiologists as “clinical assistant professors”– Cardiologists did not provide the level of academic services requiredunder contract– Prosecutors alleged that the arrangements were a scheme to pay forreferrals

Historical Settlements con’tTexas Settlement 1.9M Stark and False Claims settlement in 2008 The issue:– Orthopedic group utilized space owned by hospitalwithout paying rent– Physicians in group referred orthopedic patients,services, and items to hospital Hospital self-disclosed arrangement after conductingan internal compliance audit

Historical Settlements con’tHealthSouth and Physicians 14.9M Stark, Anti-kickback, and False Claimssettlement in 2008 Settlement involved both HealthSouth and the 2affiliated physicians involved in the arrangement Allegation: Physicians received payments above FMVpursuant to sham medical director agreements OIG concerned about hidden financial arrangementsbetween healthcare providers that influence wheretreatment is provided and what treatment is received

Historical Settlements con’tLester E. Cox Medical Centers: The “New” Erlanger 60M Stark, anti-kickback, and False Claims settlement inJuly 2008 DOJ compared Cox to Erlanger The investigation focused on:– Cost reporting violations– Inappropriate financial relationships between Cox and itscontracted physicians (compensation formula and medicaldirector relationships)– Flawed dialysis billing methodology DOJ says it is still investigating certain individuals from acriminal perspective

Historical Settlements con’tSt. John Medical Center 13M settlement resulting from a voluntary selfdisclosure to OIG Involved numerous physician agreements that did notcomply with Stark and Anti-kickback Statutes:– Some not in writing– Question of whether services provided /documented– Fair market value issues– Contract term problems – too long

DOJ Health Care Resourcesand Presentations Holder speeches DOJ presentations

How Do I Prioritize OurCompliance Analysis? Gap AnalysisStandardsMinus performanceGapxRisk Chapter 8 definition of effective compliance program

Questions?

Medicare-Medicaid ProgramIntegrity UpdateDavid T. Lewis, J.D., M.P.A.Husch Blackwell Sanders(423) 757-5935david.lewis@huschblackwell.com

Summary Overview of the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC)Program, Medicaid Integrity Contractor (MIC) Program and thetransition to Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPIC)Program Experience from the RAC Demonstration Project - patterns ofclaim denials and experience with appeals of denials Implementation of the ZPIC and MIC programs Preparing for the reviews Appeal of Denials - The Medicare and Medicaid AppealsProcesses Question / Answer

Reality Increased number of government contractors activelytrying to identify Medicare and Medicaidoverpayments and potential fraud or abuse in federalhealth programs Contracted are using sophisticated data miningprograms to identify suspect claims Healthcare organizations need effective processes tofacilitate proactive and reactive steps to prepare forand manage contractor inquiries and disputes

Pressure on Claims Growing number of entities reviewing healthcareprovider reimbursement Not limited to inpatient and outpatient hospitalreimbursement Weapons becoming more powerful– Enhanced False Claims Act and state false claims acts– DRA-required employee education designed toencourage whistle blowing

Low-Hanging Fruit Government agencies and prosecutors believe thereis massive fraud and abuse in the system– CMS estimates 10.4 billion in improper Medicarepayments– CMS estimates 18.6 billion in improper Medicaidpayments– FBI projects fraud and abuse represents 3 to10percent of total health spending– OIG reports 2.04 billion in investigative receivablesand 1.22 billion in audit disallowances in FY 20062008

Contractor Landscape Medicare Administrative Contractors

The “New” Under Arrangements Hospital Group Payors MD MD MD for TC 1 Ownership Services 3 4 1. Hospital bills for the non-professional services (facility or technical charge) at hospital rates 2. Physician Group bills for the professional services 3. Group provides a variety of services (i.e., equipment or staff; supplies; management .

Related Documents:

Hospital inpatient 11 Hospital outpatient, asc, physician 11 HCPCS supply code 15 Peripheral venous 16 Hospital inpatient 16 Hospital outpatient, asc, physician 16 HCPCS supply code 18 AV fistula – dialysis circuit 19 Hospital inpatient 19 Hospital outpatient, asc, physician 19 HCPCS supply code 21 Lead extraction and cardiac rhythm management 22

23 Eastman Dental Hospital 24 Royal National Throat, Nose & Ear Hospital 25 The Nuffield Hearing and Speech Centre 26 Moorfields Eye Hospital 27 St. Bartholomew's Hospital 28 London Bridge Hospital 29 Guy's Hospital 30 Churchill Clinic 31 St. Thomas' Hospital 32 Gordon Hospital 33 The Lister Hospital 34 Royal Hospital Chelsea 35 Charter .

3. Benishiekh General Hospital 4.Biu General Hospital 5. Shani General Hospital 6. Gubio General Hospital 7. Magumeri General Hospital 8. Konduga General Hospital 9. Dikwa General Hospital 10. Mamman Shuwa Memorial Hospital 11. Mafa General Hospital Those rehabilitated but not fully equipped are: 1. Damb

HAFNER, JOHN W Physician HAGENAUER, KATHLEEN J Advanced Practice Nurse HARRIS, GARY B Physician HAUTER, JOSEPH WILLIAM Physician HENNEBERG, JESSE LEE Advanced Practice Nurse HOLSCHBACH, JUSTIN JAMES Physician HOLTON, JACOB PETER Physician IRELAND, ALEX WILLIAM Physician JAIN, PARKER K

32. appolo hospital, Delhi 33. naraya hrudayalaya 34. kanpur medical Centre, U.P 35. narayana nathralaya 36. Sparsh narayana hridyalaya 37. Videhi medical College hospital 38. manipal hospital 39. Trinity hospital 40. Rajarajeshwari hospital 41. Raveendanath Tagor hospital 42. appolo hospital (Bilaspur) 43. Thrivanathapuram hospital Placement .

Apr 21, 2014 · Physician group exclusive provider of professional services through professional services agreement Physician group and hospital participating in ICO with payment benchmarks and shared savings component 18 . Case Study . Health System Parent Hospital . Physician Practice . Professional

Trends in Care Delivery and Community Health State Public Health Leadership Webinar Deloitte Consulting LLP June 20, 2013. . Current state of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and trends. Current state of Patient-Centered Medical Homes (PCMHs) and trends. Introduction.File Size: 2MBPage Count: 38Explore further2020 Healthcare Trends and How to Preparewww.healthcatalyst.comFive Health Care Trends For 2020 Health Affairswww.healthaffairs.orgTop 10 Emerging Trends in Health Care for 2021: The New .trustees.aha.orgRecommended to you b

Although there are different types of reports, in general, an academic report is a piece of informative writing, an act of communication and an account of an investigation (Reid, 2012). An academic report aims to sell a product, idea or points of view (Van Emden and Easteal, 1995). It should inform, explain and persuade (Williams, 1995) by using well- organised research. Sometimes it will .