FINITE ELEMENT METHOD ANALYSIS OF SLABS ON ELASTIC HALF .

3y ago
36 Views
5 Downloads
5.22 MB
93 Pages
Last View : 25d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Randy Pettway
Transcription

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD ANALYSIS OFSLABS ON ELASTIC HALF SPACEEXPANSIVE SOIL FOUNDATIONSA DissertationbyRIFAT BULUTSubmitted to the Office of Graduate Studies ofTexas A&M Universityin partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree ofDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHYDecember 2001Major Subject: Civil Engineering

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD ANALYSIS OFSLABS ON ELASTIC HALF SPACEEXPANSIVE SOIL FOUNDATIONSA DissertationbyRIFAT BULUTSubmitted to Texas A&M Universityin partial fulfillment of the requirementsfor the degree ofDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHYApproved as to style and content by:Robert L. Lytton(Chair of Committee)Kirk W. Brown(Member)Dallas N. Little(Member)Calvin E. Woods(Member)John M. Niedzwecki(Head of Department)December 2001Major Subject: Civil Engineering

iiiFinite Element Method Analysis of Slabs onElastic Half Space Expansive Soil Foundations(December 2001)Rifat BulutB.S., Middle East Technical University;M.S., Texas Tech UniversityChair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Robert L. LyttonABSTRACTA finite element computer program has been developed to analyze slabs on elastic half space expansive as well ascompressible soils. Mindlin orthotropic plate theory is adopted for structural analysis of ribbed or constant thickness slabs. Thefoundation soil is assumed to be an isotropic, homogeneous, and elastic half space. The behavior of an elastic half space iscalculated by dividing the surface of the elastic half space into rectangular regions. These regions are represented by stiffnessmatrices and they are assembled onto the rectangular plate finite elements.The shape of the soil surface underneath the slab is described by the differential soil movement (y m) and edge moisturevariation distance (e m). The mounded soil surface requires an iterative procedure in the computer program for this soil-structureinteraction system. The program calculates displacements, moments in x- and y-directions, twisting moments, and shear forces.The comparisons of the results with the Post Tensioning Institute’s (PTI) Design and Construction of Post-Tensioned Slabs-onGround manual examples show that the PTI analysis is conservative for the center lift case, but is not conservative for the edge liftcase.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSI am deeply grateful to my advisor Dr. Robert L. Lytton for his constant support, valuable guidance and inspiration during thecourse of my stay at Texas A&M University. I am fortunate to have had the opportunity of learning from him. I greatly appreciatehis advice, encouragement, guidance, and financial support, which made the completion of this dissertation possible.I would like to thank Dr. Kirk W. Brown, Dr. Dallas N. Little, and Dr. Calvin E. Woods for serving as the advisorycommittee and Dr. Gerald R. Bratton for serving as the graduate council representative. I would also like to extend my thanks toDr. J. N. Reddy for his help with the finite element method and its programming techniques.Finally, I am deeply indebted to all the members of my family for their constant support and encouragement.

ivTABLE OF CONTENTSPageABSTRACT .ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .TABLE OF CONTENTS .LIST OF FIGURES .LIST OF TABLES .CHAPTERIINTRODUCTION.1.1 The Problem.1.2 Background.1.3 Objective of Study.1.4 Outline of Dissertation.IIBACKGROUND OF RIBBED SLABS ON EXPANSIVE SOILS .2.1 Introduction.2.1.1 Volume Change Behavior of Expansive Soils .2.1.2 Structural Analysis of Slabs.2.2 Existing Design Methods.2.2.1 The Building Research Advisory Board (BRAB) Method .2.2.2 Lytton’s Method .2.2.3 Walsh’s Method .2.2.4 Fraser and Wardle Method.2.2.5 The Post Tensioning Institute (PTI) Method .2.3 Design Parameters y m and e m .2.3.1 The VOLFLO Program .2.3.1.1 Theory of Volume Change and Horizontal Moisture Flow as in VOLFLO .2.3.1.2 Naiser’s Study of Predicting Vertical Soil Movement .2.3.1.3 Mitchell’s Method of Predicting Suction Distribution in a Soil Profile .2.3.2 Edge Moisture Variation Distance .2.4 This Study.IIISOIL SUCTION AND EXPANSIVE SOILS .3.1 Soil Suction Concept .3.2 Soil Suction Measurement .3.2.1 The Filter Paper Method .3.2.1.1 Background of the Filter Paper Method .3.2.1.2 Calibration of the Filter Papers .3.2.1.3 Soil Total and Matric Suction Measurements with the Filter Papers .3.2.2 Thermocouple Psychrometers .3.2.3 Transistor Psychrometers .3.2.4 Pressure Plate and Pressure Membrane .3.3 Expansive Soils .3.3.1 Clay Minerals .3.3.1.1 Kaolinite Minerals .3.3.1.2 Illite Minerals .3.3.1.3 Montmorillonite Minerals .3.3.2 Summary .IVFOUNDATION MODEL .4.1 Introduction .4.2 Foundation Models .4.2.1 Pasternak Foundation .4.2.2 Hetenyi Foundation .4.2.3 Filonenko-Borodich Foundation .4.2.4 Vlasov Foundation .4.3 Elastic Half Space (or Elastic Continuum) Foundation .4.3.1 Soil Parameters Es and νs .4.3.1.1 Poisson’s Ratio νs .4.3.1.2 Modulus of Elasticity 617171718181819191919192020202121212121242424

vTABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont’d)PageVPLATE THEORY AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD .5.1 Introduction .5.2 Plate Material Properties .5.3 Finite Element Model of Kirchhoff Plate Theory .5.3.1 Principle of Virtual Work .5.3.2 Displacement Function for the Finite Element Model .5.4 Finite Element Model of Mindlin Plate Theory .5.4.1 Displacement Function .5.4.2 Application of Virtual Work .5.4.3 Interpolation Functions for the Finite Element Model .VIDESCRIPTION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM .6.1 Introduction .6.2 General Description .6.2.1 Slab Geometry .6.2.2 Beams .6.2.3 Loading .6.2.4 Evaluation of Contact .6.2.5 The Output .6.3 General Outline of the Program .6.3.1 The Program Subroutines .VII APPLICATIONS OF THE COMPUTER PROGRAM.7.1 Introduction .7.2 Verification of the Computer Program .7.2.1 Example One .7.2.1.1 Example One Center Lift Analysis .7.2.1.2 Example One Edge Lift Analysis .7.2.2 Example Two .7.2.3 Example Three .VIII SUMMARY, DESIGN TOOLS FOR SLABS ON EXPANSIVE SOILS .8.1 Introduction .8.2 Soil Movement .8.2.1 VOLFLO-2 .8.2.2 Soil Movement Tables .8.3 Estimating Volume Change Coefficient .8.4 Edge Moisture Variation Distance (e m) .8.5 Structural Analysis of Slab on Expansive Soil.IXCONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.9.1 Conclusions .9.2 Recommendations for Future Enhancement of the Program .REFERENCES .APPENDIX A .APPENDIX B .APPENDIX C .APPENDIX D .APPENDIX E .APPENDIX F .APPENDIX G .APPENDIX H .APPENDIX I 909192

viLIST OF 37.47.57.67.77.87.97.108.18.28.38.4PageTypical Environmental Effects on a House Foundation .

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD ANALYSIS OF SLABS ON ELASTIC HALF SPACE EXPANSIVE SOIL FOUNDATIONS A Dissertation by RIFAT BULUT Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY December 2001 Major Subject: Civil Engineering

Related Documents:

Finite element analysis DNV GL AS 1.7 Finite element types All calculation methods described in this class guideline are based on linear finite element analysis of three dimensional structural models. The general types of finite elements to be used in the finite element analysis are given in Table 2. Table 2 Types of finite element Type of .

Finite Element Method Partial Differential Equations arise in the mathematical modelling of many engineering problems Analytical solution or exact solution is very complicated Alternative: Numerical Solution – Finite element method, finite difference method, finite volume method, boundary element method, discrete element method, etc. 9

1 Overview of Finite Element Method 3 1.1 Basic Concept 3 1.2 Historical Background 3 1.3 General Applicability of the Method 7 1.4 Engineering Applications of the Finite Element Method 10 1.5 General Description of the Finite Element Method 10 1.6 Comparison of Finite Element Method with Other Methods of Analysis

The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis by T. J. R. Hughes, Dover Publications, 2000 The Finite Element Method Vol. 2 Solid Mechanics by O.C. Zienkiewicz and R.L. Taylor, Oxford : Butterworth Heinemann, 2000 Institute of Structural Engineering Method of Finite Elements II 2

Figure 3.5. Baseline finite element mesh for C-141 analysis 3-8 Figure 3.6. Baseline finite element mesh for B-727 analysis 3-9 Figure 3.7. Baseline finite element mesh for F-15 analysis 3-9 Figure 3.8. Uniform bias finite element mesh for C-141 analysis 3-14 Figure 3.9. Uniform bias finite element mesh for B-727 analysis 3-15 Figure 3.10.

The Generalized Finite Element Method (GFEM) presented in this paper combines and extends the best features of the finite element method with the help of meshless formulations based on the Partition of Unity Method. Although an input finite element mesh is used by the pro- . Probl

Finite Element Method Updated June 11, 2019 Page 1 Finite Element Method The finite element method is at the pinnacle of computational structural analysis. Argyris and Clough pioneered its application in structural analysis in the 1960’s and its mathematical foundation is the subject of a book by Strang and Fix.

Broyden Self-adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Broyden/Finite-Difference Self-Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shannon Electromagnetics Feasible Adjoint Sensitivity Technique Finite Difference Finite-Difference Time Domain Finite Element Method Method ofMoment Sequential Quadratic Programming Transmission-Line Method Trust Regions