SAN MATEO COUNTY QRIS PILOT

SAN MATEO COUNTY QRIS PILOTSITE QUALITY MONITORING REVIEWSite Name:License #:Site Address:Phone #:# of Preschool Classrooms:# of Inf/Tod Classrooms:Total # of Classrooms:# of Infants only:Monitoring Visit: Final Rating:Rating SummaryElementPointsNotes1. Child Observation2. Development & HealthScreening3. Lead Teacher4. Teacher Child InteractionEffective, Culturally & LinguisticallyResponsive5. Ratios & Group Size6. Program Environment7. Director QualificationsTotal Points:Program TypeTier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier 4Tier 5Centers7 Elements for 35 PointsBlocked MustMeet All ElementsPoint Range8 to 19Point Range20 to 25Point Range26 to 31Point Range32 and aboveFormal Tier Rating:QRIS Rater / Monitor:Summary Notes:Quality Review Site Visit – Center:1Rev. 02/06/15

Element 1: Child ObservationBlockNot required2 PointsProgram usesevidence-based childassessment/observationtool annually that coversall five domains ofdevelopment3 PointsProgram uses validand reliable childassessment/observationtool aligned with CAFoundations &Frameworks twice ayear4 PointsDRDP 2010(minimum twice ayear) and results usedto inform curriculumplanning5 PointsProgram usesDRDP 2010 twice ayear and uploads intoDRDP Tech andresults used to informcurriculum planningRandom selection & review of child files completed.Date:Staff:Confirmed use of DRDP TechDate:Yes use DRDP TechStaff:No do not use DRDP TechEvidence of DRDP goals and lesson plans for each classroom (see classroom worksheet)Date:Staff:Option 1: Proof of NAEYC accreditationOption 2: Copy of Head Start School Readiness GoalsOption 3: Copy of form CD 4001-B Desired Results Developmental ProfileSummary of Findings Classroom and Family Child Care HomeOption 4: Evidence of at least two of the following:Curriculum statementLesson planPlanning websNotes from planning sessions that verify how assessment of children’sprogress informs curriculumNotes: .Follow up needed:DescriptionQuality Review Site Visit – Center:CompleteStaff Initials2Rev. 02/06/15

Element 2: Development & Health ScreeningBlockMeets Title 22Regulations2 PointsHealth ScreeningForm (CommunityCare Licensing formLIC701 “Physician’sReport – Child CareCenters” or equivalent)used at entry, then:1. AnnuallyOR2.Ensures visionand hearingscreenings areconductedannually3 PointsProgram works withfamilies to ensurescreening of all childrenusing a valid andreliable developmentalscreening tool at entryand as indicated byresults thereafterANDMeets Criteria frompoint level 24 PointsProgram workswith families to ensurescreening of allchildren using the ASQat entry and asindicated by resultsthereafterANDMeets Criteria frompoint level 25 PointsProgram workswith families to ensurescreening of allchildren using theASQ & ASQ-SE, ifindicated, at entry,then as indicated byresults thereafterAND* Program staffuses children’sscreening results tomake referrals andimplementintervention strategiesand adaptations asappropriateANDMeets Criteriafrom point level 2Health Screening: random selection & review of child files completedDate:Staff:ASQ & ASQ-SE: random selection & review of child files completedDate:Staff:Documentation of use of screening results by staff for further assessmentDate:Staff:* Evidence of an intervention plan showing intervention strategies and adaptations used inthe classroomDate:Staff:Notes:Follow up needed:DescriptionQuality Review Site Visit – Center:CompleteStaff Initials3Rev. 02/06/15

Element 3: Lead TeacherBlock2 Points3 Points4 Points5 Points75% of lead teachers must meet the final point scoreMeets Title 22Regulations[Center: 12 units ofEarly ChildhoodEducation (ECE) / ChildDevelopment (CD)]Center: 24 units1of ECE/CDOR AssociatePermit 12 units ofECE/CD24 units of ECE/CD 16 units of GeneralEducationOR Teacher PermitAND21 hoursprofessionaldevelopment (PD)annuallyAssociate’s degree(AA) in ECE/CD (orclosely related filed)OR AA/AS in any fieldplus 24 units ofECE/CDOR Site SupervisorPermitAND21 hours PDannuallyBachelor’sdegree in ECE/CD(or closely relatedfield) OR BA/BS inany field plus 24 units of ECE/CD ORMaster’s degree inECE/CDOR Program DirectorPermitAND21 hours PDannuallySummarize information from individual data sheets. Retain data sheets with report.Teacher NameClassroom NamePoint ScoreNotes:Follow up needed:Description1CompleteStaff InitialsFor all ECE/CD units, the core 8 are desired but not required.Quality Review Site Visit – Center:4Rev. 02/06/15

Element 4: Teacher Child InteractionBlockNotRequired2 Points3 PointsFamiliarity withCLASS for appropriateage group as availableby one representativefrom the sitePre-K CLASSClassroomIndependent CLASSassessment by reliableobserver to inform theprogram’s professionaldevelopment /improvement planESCOIS(Effective, Culturally & Linguistically Responsive)4 PointsIndependent CLASSassessment by reliableobserver with minimumCLASS scores:Pre-K Emotional Support – 5 Instructional Support – 3 Classroom Organization–5Toddler Emotional & BehavioralSupport – 5 Engaged Support forLearning – 3.5Infant Responsive Caregiving –5Assessor5 PointsIndependent assessmentwith CLASS with minimumCLASS scores:Pre-K Emotional Support – 5.5 Instructional Support –3.5 Classroom Organization– 5.5Toddler Emotional & BehavioralSupport – 5.5 Engaged Support forLearning – 4Infant Responsive Caregiving –5.5DateAverage of allclassroomsToddler CLASSClassroomEBSESLAssessorDateAverage of all classroomsInfant CLASSClassroomRCAssessorDateAverage of all classroomsNotes:Quality Review Site Visit – Center:5Rev. 02/06/15

Element 5: Group Size and RatiosBlock2 Points3 Points4 Points5 PointsCenter: Title 22RegulationsCenter – Ratio:Group SizeCenter – Ratio:Group SizeCenter – Ratio:Group SizeCenter – Ratio:Group SizeInfant Ratio of 1:4Toddler OptionRatio of 1:6Infant/Toddler – 4:16Toddler – 3:18Infant/Toddler – 3:12Toddler – 2:12Preschool – 3:36Preschool – 2:24Infant/Toddler – 3:12or 2:8Toddler – 2:10Infant/Toddler – 3:9or betterToddler – 3:12 orbetterPreschool – 1:8 ratioand group size of nomore than 20Preschool – 3:24 or2:20Preschool Ratio of1:12Ratios observation completed.Date:ClassroomStaff:AgePointScore# ofChildren# of StaffNotes:Follow up needed:DescriptionQuality Review Site Visit – Center:CompleteStaff Initials6Rev. 02/06/15

Element 6: Program EnvironmentBlockNot required2 PointsFamiliarity with ERSand every classroomuses ERS as a part of aQuality ImprovementPlanERS ScoresClassroom3 PointsIndependentERS assessment.All subscalescompleted andaveraged to meetoverall score levelof 4.0ToolScore4 PointsIndependent ERSassessment. Alsubscales completedand averaged to meetoverall score level of5.05 PointsIndependent ERSassessment. Allsubscales completedand averaged to meetoverall score level of 5.5AssessorDateAverage of all classroomsNotes:Follow up needed:DescriptionQuality Review Site Visit – Center:CompleteStaff Initials7Rev. 02/06/15

Element 7: Director QualificationsBlock12 units coreECE/CD 3 unitsmanagement /administration2 Points3 Points24 units coreECE/CD 16 unitsGeneral Education 3units management /administrationOR Master TeacherPermit4 PointsAssociate’s degreewith 24 units coreECE/CD 6 unitsmanagement /administration 2units supervisionOR Site SupervisorPermitANDOR Program tifytheirrace/ethnicity?Master’s degreewith 30 units coreECE/CD includingspecialized courses 8 units management /administrationOR AdministrativeCredentialAND21 hours sianBi- ‐RacialorMulti- nown/DeclinetoStateOtherBachelor’s degreewith 24 units coreECE/CD 8 unitsmanagement /administration21 hours PDannually21 hours PDannuallyDirectorName5 alDevelopmentType:HoursTotal:Ratedby:Classroom File ReviewQuality Review Site Visit – Center:Date:8Rev. 02/06/15

ClassroomDRDPDRDPPlanningDRDPTechHealthFormASQ &ASQ-SEASQPlanningInterventionPlanFollow up needed:DescriptionCompleteStaff InitialsNoneQuality Review Site Visit – Center:9Rev. 02/06/15

DRDP 2010 (minimum twice a year) and results used to inform curriculum planning Program uses DRDP 2010 twice a year and uploads into DRDP Tech and results used to inform curriculum planning Random selection & review of child files completed. Date: Staff: Confirmed use of DRDP Tech Yes use DRDP Tech No do not use DRDP Tech