Section 10: Antimicrobial Stewardship And Clostridium .

2y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
759.38 KB
8 Pages
Last View : 9d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Abby Duckworth
Transcription

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile InfectionsSection 10: Antimicrobial Stewardshipand Clostridium difficile Infection: APrimer for the Infection PreventionistAntimicrobial stewardship may be a relatively newaddition to the job responsibilities of the IP. Thediscussion of antimicrobial use and its impact onpatients in all healthcare settings in this section isfocused solely within the context of C. difficile. Thebroad term “antimicrobial stewardship” is used inplace of “antibiotic stewardship,” as development ofa stewardship program ideally includes all antiviraland antifungal agents as well as antibiotics. Asantibiotics are the antimicrobial agents effectiveagainst bacteria, the term antibiotic is used mostoften in the discussion of C. difficile infection.Role of antibiotic use in theoccurrence of CDIBecause CDI is nearly always a complication ofantibiotic use, the development of a healthcarefacility program to ensure appropriate antibioticuse is considered an important preventionintervention.1-4 Figure 10.1 represents the differentphases of C. difficile infection of the colon, startingwith a normal colonic environment (phase A)through the development of pseudomembranouscolitis (phase D).The most important protection mechanismagainst CDI in humans is the normal gut flora.These bacteria reside in the gastrointestinaltract and prevent pathogens from attaching,multiplying, and producing disease.5,6Normal colonic floraThe hundreds of trillions of bacteria thatmake up our normal gastrointestinal floraare an important defense mechanism againstintestinal pathogens.5,6 This ecosystem ofbacteria is called the human gastrointestinalmicrobiome. Some of the normal bacterialflora is attached to receptors on the epithelialcells in the colon, whereas other bacteria arepresent in the lumen of the gastrointestinaltract (Figure 10.1, phase A). In order for C.difficile to maintain a presence, the normalflora must be depleted. Due to the diversebacterial species in the human colon, it hasbeen difficult to identify which particularorganisms are responsible for the protectiveeffect against C. difficile. The exact mechanismby which an intact gastrointestinal floraprotects against C. difficile colonization is notcompletely understood, but several mechanismshave been proposed. To cause colonizationor an infection, C. difficile needs to attach toreceptors in the human gastrointestinal cells. Ifthese receptors are occupied by organisms of thenormal gastrointestinal flora, C. difficile strainsreaching the gut mucosa will have no place forattachment and will not be able to survive.In addition to preventing colonization bycompeting for attachment sites, the normalflora may prevent colonization by deprivingC. difficile of essential nutrients. The normalflora may also antagonize C. difficile throughthe production of substances that inhibit orkill C. difficile. Antibiotics may also alter thecolonic microenvironment by changing the localprotein composition or amount of local mucusproduction, which may aid the survival of C.difficile.Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology73

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile InfectionsFigure 10.1. Phases of pathogenesis of C. difficile colitis.Phase APhase BPhase CPhase DNormal GIFlora & MucosaC diffColonizationC diff ToxinProductionC diffColitisC diffC diff toxinsA&BAntibioticsPseudomembraneWhite blood cellsFigure 12.1. Phases of the pathogenesis of C. difficile colitisunder the anaerobic conditions of the colon, 5)Antibiotic collateral damageantibiotic dose, 6) the route of administration,As mentioned previously, the normaland 7) antibiotic excretion in the bile. Antibioticgastrointestinal flora are the main protectioncollateral damage is largely due to the killing ofmechanism of the host to prevent colonizationnormal colonic flora, but antibiotics may causeand infection with pathogens such as C. difficile. Ifcollateral damage by altering other colonic factorsthis microbiome is disrupted (Figure 10.1, phasebeyond bacteria that may play an important roleB), C. difficile can attach to the gastrointestinalin local defense mechanisms against C. difficile. Inepithelial cells, produce toxin (Figure 10.1,the next sections, we review the major factors ofphase C), and cause disease (Figure 10.1, phaseantibiotics that play a role in the disruption of theD). Because antibiotics kill bacteria and are notnormal colonic flora, leading to colonization and/specific to one particular bacterium, they all haveor infection with this pathogen.the ability to disrupt the balance of bacteria inthe microbiome. The propensity of a particularantibiotic to alter the gastrointestinal flora can beAntibiotic spectrum of activitydefined as antibiotic “collateral damage.”7and duration of therapyThe extent of damage depends upon a numberof antibiotic-specific factors such as: 1) thespectrum of activity, 2) duration of therapy, 3) theamount of the antibiotic that reaches the colonicenvironment, 4) the activity of the antibiotic74All antibiotics produce disruption of the colonicflora, but they are not equal in their capability tocause collateral damage. The first two elementsthat need to be considered when evaluating therisk for CDI produced by a particular antibioticAssociation for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile Infectionsinclude antibiotic spectrum and duration.8 Thefirst is the level of risk produced by a particularantibiotic, defined by the antibiotic spectrumof activity. As the titles suggest, broad-spectrumantibiotics kill a variety of different bacteria,whereas narrow-spectrum antibiotics kill a muchsmaller variety. In this regard some antibiotics willplace the patient at low, intermediate, or high riskfor development of CDI.The second factor to be considered is thenumber of days that the patient will be at riskfor development of CDI. Greatest days at riskfor colonization occur during the time that thepatient is receiving antibiotic therapy and up to5 to 10 days after discontinuation of antibiotics,although the risk may extend for 3 months ormore. The longer a patient is treated with anantibiotic, the more normal flora will be killed.8These two factors combined are critical in thepathogenesis of C. difficile. For example, a patientwho receives a narrow-spectrum antibiotic for lessthan 1 day, such as one dose of a first-generationcephalosporin for surgical prophylaxis, willbe considered to have a low level of risk anda short duration of risk. If the same patient isgiven surgical prophylaxis with an unnecessarilybroad-spectrum antibiotic (e.g., a carbapenem),the level of risk can move from low to highwithout any additional clinical benefit from thatbroad-spectrum antibiotic. Extension of surgicalprophylaxis with a first-generation cephalosporinfor multiple doses that continue beyond the dayof surgery will also increase the risk of CDI byincreasing the number of days that the patientwill be at risk. Even though all antibiotic therapy,appropriate or inappropriate, will place the patientat risk for CDI, the prolonged use of broadspectrum antibiotics is an unnecessary additionalrisk factor that may be prevented.The most common inappropriate antibioticuse that places a patient at increased risk is thecontinuation of broad-spectrum antibiotics afterthe etiology of infection has been identified,and the pathogen is found to be susceptible toa narrower-spectrum antibiotic. For example,in a patient with a prolonged ICU stay thatdeveloped a ventilator-associated pneumonia(VAP), it would be appropriate to start empirictherapy with a broad-spectrum regimen to coverthe possibility of resistant Gram-positive as wellas Gram-negative bacteria (e.g., vancomycin pluspiperacillin/tazobactam). If respiratory or bloodcultures identify an MSSA as the etiology of VAP,the continuation of the initial broad-spectrumcoverage should be considered inappropriate. Int bileAntibiotics excreted in the bile at a highconcentration have been shown to deplete moreof the normal flora than those that are not. Thisis due to high intraintestinal concentrationsof these drugs. Antibiotic excretion in thebile may be considered a higher priority thanoral versus intravenous administration as well.Intravenous antibiotics excreted in the bile at highconcentrations may kill more of the normal florathan incompletely absorbed oral antibiotics.10,11Role of antimicrobialstewardship in prevention ofcolonization and infectionColonization with C. difficile may occur whenthe normal flora is depleted and the organismis introduced into the gastrointestinal tract.Interventions to improve the practice with regardto the previously mentioned factors will help toreduce the excessive depletion of the normal flora.However, antimicrobial stewardship practiceswill not prevent introduction of the organisminto the gastrointestinal tract. Basic infectionprevention practices are necessary for this essentialcomponent of C. difficile prevention.Once a patient is colonized with C. difficile, thepatient may progress to develop C. difficile colitisAssociation for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile Infectionsor may remain colonized without developingdisease. Lack of disease may be due to colonizationwith a C. difficile strain that does not producetoxins.12 Once the patient is colonized with anontoxigenic strain, the patient may be less likelyto be colonized with another strain—one that maybe toxigenic. It is considered that the initial strainmay occupy receptors than become unavailableto a new strain. The use of metronidazole in apatient colonized with a nontoxigenic C. difficilestrain may favor development of C. difficile colitisby killing the nontoxigenic strain and allowingcolonization and infection due to a toxigenicstrain. This is the reason behind laboratorytesting for C. difficile toxins as opposed to solelytesting for C. difficile antigens (e.g., glutamatedehydrogenase). Antigen testing does notdifferentiate between toxigenic and nontoxigenicstrains.13 Identification of the organism throughantigen testing alone will provide clinicians withunnecessary data and may result in unnecessaryantimicrobial treatment. However, a positive testfor C. difficile toxin in the stool is not by itselfindication for antibiotic therapy. A patient whois asymptomatic but has a positive C. difficiletest should be considered a carrier and antibiotictherapy is not indicated. The inappropriateuse of metronidazole or vancomycin may favordevelopment of disease or MDROs in a patientwho is only a carrier.Role of antimicrobialstewardship in treatment ofinfectionOnce a patient is diagnosed as having CDI,antimicrobial stewardship is important to achieveoptimal medical therapy. This is represented inthe C. difficile prevention activities (Figure 10.1)as the fourth level of intervention. There arethree strategies that can be considered for themanagement of a patient with C. difficile colitis:1) killing of C. difficile, 2) blocking toxin, and 3)restoring normal flora.Killing of C. difficile in the colon can be achievedwith the use of a number of antibiotics, mostFigure 10.2. Activities to prevent and manage C. difficile infection in healthcare settings.First Step: Antibioticcollateral damageSecond Step: C diffnosocomial exposureThird Step: C difftoxin productionFourth Step: ToxinhyperproductionFifth Step: Shock& Severe SepsisPatientNormal GI FloraPatientDisruption of GI FloraPatientC diff ColonizationPatientC diff ColitisPatientFulminant ColitisPatientDeath due to C diffC difficile Preventionand ol3Prevention ofInfection4AntimicrobialStewardshipOptimal5 Surgical TreatmentSentinel Event &6 Root Cause AnalysisFigure 10.2. Activities to preventand manageC. difficilein infectionin healthcaresettings.Associationfor ProfessionalsInfection Controland Epidemiology77

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile Infectionscommonly oral metronidazole or oral vancomycin.In patients treated with oral metronidazole, thestool metronidazole levels decrease as colonicinflammation improves, when the patient movesfrom liquid stools to more formed stools. Oralvancomycin maintains similar concentrationsthroughout therapy. In patients with an ileus,a significant delay in the passage of antibioticsfrom the stomach to the colon may occur. Whenintravenous therapy is necessary, metronidazolecan be used because it is excreted by the bileand by the inflamed colonic mucosa, achievingfecal levels sufficient to treat CDI. On the otherhand, intravenous vancomycin is not excretedinto the colon and cannot be used to treat CDI.If oral vancomycin cannot be used, vancomycinenemas are an alternative to kill C. difficile in thecolon. Even when appropriate metronidazoleor vancomycin therapy is used, relapse of CDIis expected to occur in 10 to 25 percent of thepatients. A relatively new agent, fidaxomicin,is also available for the treatment of C. difficileinfections. This agent has been shown to be aseffective as the other available agents, but mayimprove patient outcomes through decreasing thelikelihood of disease relapse.14with an antibiotic that produces minimal collateraldamage of the gastrointestinal flora. In an attemptto restore the colonic microenvironment, the oraladministration of microorganisms with beneficialproperties, or probiotics, has been investigatedin patients with CDI. The theoretical benefits ofprobiotics in patients with CDI may include thesuppression of C. difficile growth, the binding ofprobiotics to epithelial cells to block receptorsfor C. difficile binding, improvement of intestinalbarrier function, and favorable modulation ofthe local immune system. Because the data fromclinical studies of probiotics in patients with CDIis inconclusive, probiotics are not consideredcurrent standard of care in the managementof patients with CDI.15 In an effort to restorenormal colonic flora, the administration of theentire fecal flora from a healthy individual, anapproach referred to as fecal transplant, has beeninvestigated. Although the data are largely limitedto case series, the fecal transplant has been shownto be more than 90 percent successful at treatingrelapsing CDI.16Blocking C. difficile toxin in the colon with theanion-binding resins colestipol and cholestyraminehas been investigated but this strategy is noteffective as primary therapy for CDI. The toxinsmay be blocked by administration of intravenousimmunoglobulin because commercially availableintravenous formulations contain antibodiesto toxin A and B. This approach is sometimesconsidered for patients with severe disease.The goal of an antimicrobial stewardship programis to optimize the use of the right drug, for theright purpose, at the right dose, and for the rightduration in an effort to promote judicious useof the antimicrobial agent. Discussion of whatconstitutes an effective stewardship program isbeyond the scope of this document but the basicsinclude elements such as 1) written guidelinesfor use of specific antimicrobials that have beendeveloped using evidence as a basis and involveinput from clinicians; 2) accurate microbiologicresults and prompt reporting of those results;3) antibiograms compiled and disseminatedin a manner that enables clinicians to selectthe appropriate agent(s) for empiric therapy;4) systems that minimize opportunities forinappropriate duration of therapy; 5) processesthat actively support de-escalation of therapy toa more narrow-spectrum agent; 6) feedback onadherence to guidelines; and 7) monitoring ofRestoration of the normal colonicmicroenvironment is of paramount importancein the management of CDI. A critical step in therestoration of normal colonic flora is an evaluationof the patient to determine if current antibiotictherapy could be discontinued. In some patientscontinuation of antibiotic therapy will be necessaryto complete treatment of an infection. In thesecases the antimicrobial team, considering the typeof infection, can suggest continuation of therapy78Elements of an antimicrobialstewardship programAssociation for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile Infectionssystems that support the total program. Thoroughdiscussions of the key elements of an antimicrobialstewardship program can be found in othersources.17,18 These examples are but a few of theimportant elements for an effective antimicrobialstewardship program and serve to demonstratethe scope of activities and depth of administrativesupport necessary for success.Infections due to C. difficile are increasing inincidence and severity in healthcare settings.These infections are associated with increasedpatient morbidity and mortality. It is concerningthat patients admitted to a healthcare facility fornoninfectious diseases can die during hospitalizationdue to an infection produced by C. difficile.Considering the critical role that antibiotic use playsin the pathogenesis of CDI, it is important for allhealthcare facilities and practitioners to implementan antimicrobial stewardship program with afocus on CDI prevention, control, and treatment.A combination of optimal infection preventionactivities and antibiotic control is necessaryto prevent the transmission of C. difficile anddevelopment of CDI.To maintain a comprehensive approach tooptimizing use of antimicrobial agents, itis important that the IP understands thecomponents of an antimicrobial stewardshipprogram and the organizational support necessaryfor its success.difficile-associated disease caused by the hypervirulentNAP1/027 strain. Clin Infect Dis 2007;45 Suppl2:S112-121.4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Vital signs: preventing Clostridium difficileinfections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012 Mar9;61(9):157-162.5. Wilson KH. The microecology of Clostridiumdifficile. Clin Infect Dis 1993;16 Suppl 4:S214-218.6. Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A,Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, et al. Decreased diversityof the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridiumdifficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis 2008;197:435438.7. Owens RC, Jr., Donskey CJ, Gaynes RP, Loo VG,Muto CA. Antimicrobial-associated risk factors forClostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46Suppl 1:S19-31.8. Stevens V, Dumyati G, Fine LS, Fisher SG, vanWijngaarden E. Cumulative antibiotic exposures overtime and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection.Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:42-48.9. Hoiby N. Ecological antibiotic policy. J AntimicrobChemother 2000;46 Suppl 1:59-62; discussion 3-5.10. Acocella G, Mattiussi R, Nicolis FB, Pallanza R,Tenconi LT. Biliary excretion of antibiotics in man.Gut 1968;9:536-545.11. Wexner SD, Stollman N. Diseases of the colon. NewYork: Informa Healthcare; 2007.References1. Bartlett JG. A call to arms: the imperative forantimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53Suppl 1:S4-7.2. Carling P, Fung T, Killion A, Terrin N, Barza M.Favorable impact of a multidisciplinary antibioticmanagement program conducted during 7 years. InfectControl Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:699-706.3. Valiquette L, Cossette B, Garant MP, Diab H,Pepin J. Impact of a reduction in the use of high-riskantibiotics on the course of an epidemic of Clostridium12. Karen CC, John GB. Biology of Clostridiumdifficile: implications for epidemiology and diagnosis.Annu Rev Microbiol 2011;65:501-521.13. Fenner L, Widmer AF, Goy G, Rudin S, Frei R.Rapid and reliable diagnostic algorithm for detectionof Clostridium difficile. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46:328330.14. Louie TJ, Miller MA, Mullane KM, WeissK, Lentnek A, Golan Y, et al. Fidaxomicin versusvancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N EnglJ Med 2011;364:422-431.Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology79

Guide to Preventing Clostridium difficile Infections15. Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile--moredifficult than ever. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1932-1940.16. Gough E, Shaikh H, Manges AR. Systematicreview of intestinal microbiota transplantation (fecalbacteriotherapy) for recurrent Clostridium difficileinfection. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:994-1002.17. Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE, Jr.,Gerding DN, Weinstein RA, Burke. JP, et al.Infectious Diseases Society of America and theSociety for Healthcare Epidemiology of Americaguidelines for developing an institutional program toenhance antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis2007;44:159-177.18. Charani E, Edwards R, Sevdalis N, Alexandrou B,Sibley E, Mullett D, et al. Behavior change strategiesto influence antimicrobial prescribing in acute care: asystematic review. Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:651-662.80 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology

Normal colonic flora The hundreds of trillions of bacteria that make up our normal gastrointestinal flora are an important defense mechanism against intestinal pathogens.5,6 This ecosystem of bacteria is called the human gastrointestinal microbiome. Some of the normal bacterial flora is attached to receptors on the epithelial

Related Documents:

Chapter 5: Antimicrobial stewardship education for clinicians 123 Acronyms and abbreviations 126 5.1 Introduction 127 5.2 Key elements of antimicrobial stewardship education 128 5.2.1 Audiences 128 5.2.2 Principles of education on antimicrobial stewardship 129 5.2.3 Antimicrobial stewardship competencies and standards 129

A Hospital Pharmacist’s Guide to Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Greater New York Hospital Association United Hospital Fund — Antimicrobial Stewardship Toolkit - Best Practices from the GNYHA/UHF Antimicrobial Stewardship Collaborative National Quality Pa

Feb 24, 2021 · ix Fig. 1. Steps in clinical decision-making Examples of how to use the practical guide are: z as a reference when planning to implement an antimicrobial stewardship intervention; and z as a tool for educating colleagues and clinicians at your institution about antimicrobial stewardship. Barriers to a

health pharmacists-driven recommendation acceptance rates. 2. Provide examples of metrics to determine the success of an antimicrobial stewardship program. 3. Explain how order sets can be helpful in an antimicrobial stewardship program. Presented at the Washington State Hospital Associat

Antimicrobials, Aspergillus fumigatus, Antimicrobial Peptides 1. Introduction 1.1. Antimicrobial Peptides and Proteins It is notable that antimicrobial peptides particularly cationic ones play a signifi-cant role within the natural immunity of animal defences against topical and general microbes altogether species of life. These antimicrobial .

Antimicrobial Peptides 2 ANTIMICROBIAL PEPTIDES OFFERED BY BACHEM Ribosomally synthesized antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) constitute a structurally diverse group of molecules found virtually in all organisms. Most antimicrobial peptides contain less than 100 amino acid residues, have a net positive charge, and are membrane active. They are major

Several groups in the 1970s and 1980s reported antimicrobial peptides produced from leukocytes, including α-defensins from rabbits and humans [10]. One important landmark in the history of antimicrobial peptides is the work of Boman et al. in 1981. Boman injected bacteria into pupae of a silk moth and isolated the antimicrobial peptides

activity mechanisms, and their antimicrobial activity against a broad spectrum of microorganisms, such as gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi, parasites and viruses (23-25 ). 1.2. Antimicrobial peptides - a new class of antibi otics? Antimicrobial peptides are part of the innate immune system and play an important