Top DoD Management Challenges

2y ago
2 Views
1 Downloads
5.04 MB
94 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Louie Bolen
Transcription

Top DoDManagementChallengesFiscal Year 2018

I N T E G R I T Y E F F I C I E N C Y A C C O U N TA B I L I T Y E X C E L L E N C EMissionOur mission is to provide independent, relevant, and timely oversightof the Department of Defense that supports the warfighter; promotesaccountability, integrity, and efficiency; advises the Secretary ofDefense and Congress; and informs the public.VisionOur vision is to be a model oversight organization in the FederalGovernment by leading change, speaking truth, and promotingexcellence—a diverse organization, working together as oneprofessional team, recognized as leaders in our field.F r a u d, W a s t e, & A b u s eHOTLINEDepartment of Defensedodig.mil/hotline 8 0 0 . 4 2 4 . 9 0 9 8For more information about whistleblower protection, please see the inside back cover.

INSPECTOR GENERALDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE4800 MARK CENTER DRIVEALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500TOP MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE CHALLENGES FACINGTHE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSEPublic Law 106-531, the “Reports Consolidation Act of 2000,” requires each Inspector General (IG)to prepare an annual statement that summarizes what the IG considers to be the “most seriousmanagement and performance challenges facing the agency” and also requires the IG to assess theAgency’s progress in addressing those challenges. The law states that “agency head may comment onthe IG’s statement, but may not modify the statement.” By statute, the IG’s statement must be includedin the agency’s Financial Report.The following is the DoD Office of Inspector General’s (OIG) statement on the top management andperformance challenges facing the DoD. The challenges outlined in this statement were identifiedbased on a variety of factors, including DoD OIG oversight work, research, and judgment; oversightwork done by other DoD components; oversight projects conducted by the GAO; and input from DoDofficials. While we also reviewed DoD statements, documents, and assessments of these and othercritical issues, we identified these top challenges independently.The DoD OIG also uses this document as a research and planning tool to identify areas of risk in theDoD operations. It is forward looking and outlines the most significant management and performancechallenges facing the DoD now and in the future.This year’s summary of challenges is for FY 2018 rather than for FY 2017. In previous years, thedocument’s title contained the year of the DoD financial statement that included this report. Whilelast year’s report was labelled as FY 2016, this year we labelled the document as the top managementchallenges for FY 2018 to reflect its forward-looking orientation. Therefore, no document is labelledFY 2017 summary of management challenges, but there has been no gap in our top managementchallenges documents.As reflected in this document, the FY 2018 top 10 management and performance challenges are:1. Countering Strategic Challenges: North Korea, Russia, China, Iran, and Transnational Terrorism2. Addressing Challenges in Overseas Contingency Operations in Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan3. Enabling Effective Acquisition and Contract Management4. Increasing Cyber Security and Cyber Capabilities5. Improving Financial Management6. Maintaining the Nuclear Enterprise7. Optimally Balancing Readiness, Modernization, and Force Structure8. Ensuring Ethical Conduct9. Providing Effective, Comprehensive, and Cost Effective Health Care10. Identifying and Implementing Efficiencies in the DoD

INSPECTOR GENERALDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE4800 MARK CENTER DRIVEALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500These challenges are not listed in order of importance or by magnitude of the challenge. All arecritically important management challenges.We look forward to working with the DoD to help address these important challenges.Glenn A. FineActing Inspector General

INSPECTOR GENERALDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE4800 MARK CENTER DRIVEALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22350-1500

CONTENTSU.S. marines with the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, and sailors from the USS Kearsarge, conduct a foreign object anddebris walk-down during departure aboard the Kearsarge at Naval Station Norfolk, Virginia. (U.S. Marine Corps photo)iv DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD

CONTENTSSummary of Managementand Performance ChallengesFacing the DoDFISCAL YEAR 2018Challenge 1: Countering Strategic Challenges:North Korea, Russia, China, Iranand Transnational Terrorism. 2Challenge 2: Addressing Challengesin Overseas Contingency Operationsin Iraq, Syria, and Afghanistan.10Challenge 3: Enabling Effective Acquisitionand Contract Management. 18Challenge 4: Increasing Cybersecurityand Cyber Capabilities. 28Challenge 5: ImprovingFinancial Management. 40Challenge 6: Maintaining theNuclear Enterprise. 48Challenge 7: Optimally Balancing Readiness,Modernization, and Force Structure. 56Challenge 8: Ensuring Ethical Conduct. 64Challenge 9: Providing Effective,Comprehensive, and Cost EffectiveHealth Care. 72Challenge 10: Identifying and ImplementingEfficiencies in the DoD. 80DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD v

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMCamp Humphreys, Republic of Korea: Soldiers from 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment, 2nd Armored Brigade CombatTeam, 1st Cavalry Division, secure cargo lines to a CH-47 Chinook during sling load training. (U.S. Army photo)1 DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMChallenge 1: Countering StrategicChallenges: North Korea, Russia, China, Iranand Transnational TerrorismAddressing evolving global threats presents a significant challenge for theDepartment of Defense (DoD). State and non-state actors present securitychallenges that have destabilized the post-Cold War international order, andthe DoD must confront these challenges in close coordination with U.S. alliesand DoD interagency partners.In a recent interview, General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefsof Staff, identified five significant global strategic challenges to U.S. interests:North Korea, Russia, China, Iran, and violent extremism or transnationalterrorism. General Dunford noted that the DoD does not have “the luxurytoday of singling out one challenge.” He stated that, from a capabilityperspective, Russia presents the greatest mid-to-long-term threat toU.S. national security, but from an urgency perspective, North Korea posesthe top challenge.NORTH KOREA“The most urgent and dangerous threat to peace and security [in the world]is North Korea,” Secretary of Defense James Mattis said in a June 12, 2017,statement before the House Armed Services Committee, and that assessmentis even more concerning today. North Korea’s aggressive pursuit of nuclearweapons and ballistic missile technologies, and its role in their proliferation,presents a growing strategic threat to U.S. forces in the region and to theU.S. mainland, as well as to North Korea’s neighbors, South Korea and Japan.The United States is pressuring North Korea to stop the development of itsnuclear weapons and ballistic missiles programs.However, North Korea has continued to develop its nuclear weapons andballistic missile programs. Throughout 2017, North Korea conducted ballisticmissile tests, including launching intercontinental ballistic missiles. Publiclyreported analysis indicated that North Korea’s intercontinental ballisticmissiles have the technical capability to reach the entire State of Alaskaand parts of the U.S. mainland. On September 3, 2017, North Korea claimedto have tested a thermonuclear bomb—the blast was recorded by the U.S.Geological Survey as a human-made, 6.3-magnitude seismic event, which wasfar larger than previous North Korean nuclear weapon tests. Moreover, theDefense Intelligence Agency stated that North Korea is capable of creating aminiaturized nuclear device to use as a missile warhead. In addition to itsnuclear capability, North Korea has deployed a significant ground force alongits border with South Korea, maintains a chemical and biological warfarecapability, and can strike South Korea’s capital, Seoul, with a formidable arrayof artillery and rockets.DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD 2

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMRepublic of Korea Marine Amphibious Assault Vehicleseject smoke clouds during a Korean Marine ExchangeProgram exercise. (U.S. Marine Corps photo)According to the 2017 Defense Posture Statement,the DoD has developed a comprehensive set ofalliance capabilities to deter and counter theNorth Korean threat. The DoD maintains 80,000military personnel and a significant ground, air,and sea force capability in and around SouthKorea and Japan. It conducts regular joint militaryexercises with South Korea and Japan, with whomthe United States has security treaty commitments.The United States and South Korea have alsoagreed to deploy a Terminal High-Altitude AreaDefense missile capability to South Korea to defendSouth Korea and alliance forces from North Korea’sballistic missile threats.Speaking in Seoul on August 14, 2017, GeneralDunford stated that the military directly supportsU.S. diplomatic and economic efforts to resolve thecrisis with North Korea. He also stated that theDoD provides viable military options in the eventthat deterrence fails. However, General Dunfordnoted that armed conflict with North Korea wouldlead to a level of casualties not experienced sinceWorld War II. Similarly, Secretary of DefenseMattis has said that a military confrontation withNorth Korea would be “catastrophic.”The United States continues to reach out toChina, North Korea’s closest ally and tradingpartner, to convince China to pressure NorthKorea to halt its nuclear program. In 2017,the United States imposed additional economicsanctions on North Korea, and China agreed toUnited Nations’ limitations on future imports fromNorth Korea. However, North Korea has rejectedformal negotiations and expressed no intention tode‑nuclearize or stop developing ballistic missiles.North Korean leader Kim Jong-un reportedlybelieves that maintaining North Korea’s nuclearand ballistic missile capability is necessary to deterthe threat that North Korea’s perceived enemies,principally the United States, pose to his regime.Given the level of concern over North Korea’sstatements and actions, the DoD faces severalchallenges: maintaining a high level of militaryreadiness and deterrence; supporting the U.S. andallied strategy to seek diplomatic negotiationswhile imposing economic sanctions; and, ifrequired, executing a military option.RUSSIAIn June 2017, Secretary of Defense Mattis testifiedabout a resurgent and more aggressive Russia,which objects to key aspects of the post-Cold Warinternational order by taking multiple actionsagainst other countries, including challenging thesovereignty of nations on its borders. In recentyears, Russia has clashed with the United Statesover the 2014 revolution in Ukraine that ousted itspro-Russian president, the subsequent revolt of thepresident’s supporters and Russia’s interventionin Eastern Ukraine and seizure of Crimea. Russiahas also opposed the expansion of the NorthAtlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) into the Balticcountries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, whichbrought U.S. and other NATO allies’ military forcesto Russia’s border.In the Syrian civil war, Russia intervened on behalfof the Government of Syria. As a result, U.S. forcesconducting operations to defeat the Islamic Stateof Iraq and Syria (ISIS) in Syria operate in closeproximity to Russian military forces. The DefenseIntelligence Agency has reported that Russia’smilitary intervention in Syria changed the dynamicof the conflict, bolstered the government of Syria,and ensured that resolution to the conflict isimpossible without Russia’s agreement.3 DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMIn addition to having a formidable nuclear force,Russia has significantly advanced its conventionaland unconventional military capabilities. TheRussian military has enhanced its ground, sea, andair strategic and operational forces; deployed anasymmetric, unconventional warfare capability;and expanded its covert use of cyber andinformation operations.In Europe, the United States and its NATO allieshave reinforced their military capabilities. Throughthe European Deterrence (formerly Reassurance)Initiative, announced in June 2014, the DoD hassought to build its European allies and partners’capability to enable a quicker and more robustresponse to support NATO’s common defense. TheEuropean Deterrence Initiative augmented thepresence of U.S. forces in Eastern Europe throughincreased unit rotations and pre-positionedmateriel in strategic locations. In addition, otherNATO countries have deployed military units tothe Baltic countries and to Romania, Poland, andBulgaria. NATO is also enhancing its ResponseForce into a flexible and mobile, 40,000-troopjoint force composed of land, sea, air, and specialoperations units, and is conducting increasedtraining and joint exercises with partner countries’security forces. The total U.S. investment in theEuropean Deterrence Initiative has quadrupledover the past year, from 789 million in FY 2016 to 3.4 billion for FY 2017.However, challenges remain to the rapiddeployment of U.S. and other NATO forces inresponse to potential Russian aggression. Forexample, a recently released DoD OIG evaluationnoted that, according to senior U.S. EuropeanCommand officials, obstacles to a timely militaryground response by U.S. and other NATO forces to aRussian military attack include a lack of compatibleinfrastructure and movement agreements betweenNATO countries and experience controllingmilitary convoys.In Syria, the United States and Russia haveestablished communication mechanisms tode‑conflict operations and avoid conflict. OnJune 19, 2017, after U.S. forces shot down a Syrianfighter aircraft, the Russian defense ministry issueda statement that “all kinds of airborne vehicles,including aircraft and UAVs of the internationalcoalition detected to the west of the EuphratesRiver will be tracked by the Russian SAM [surfaceto-air missiles] systems as air targets.” Despite theheightened tension resulting from these actions theUnited States and Russia have sought to deconflictair zones in Syria. To further reduce the potentialfor military confrontation, in agreement with theUnited States and other concerned countries, Russiahas established and is monitoring de-escalationzones in southern Syria.U.S. Marine Corps KC-130 J Hercules aircraft with Marine Aerial Refueler Transport Squadrons. (U.S. Marine Corps photo)DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD 4

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMA U.S. Navy Boatswain’s Mate directs an MH-60S Seahawk helicopter to the flight deck aboard the Littoral Combat ShipUSS Coronado. (U.S. Navy photo)Strategically, Russia’s actions indicate that it hasestablished an enduring presence in Syria tomaintain its warm-water naval port and to projectpower regionally. As a United Nations SecurityCouncil member, Russia also influences a widerange of other international issues, including thefight against terrorism. The potential exists formilitary confrontation in these areas; the DoDneeds to maintain an effective military deterrencecapability and dialogue with the Russian military.CHINAAlready a nuclear weapons power, China continuesto further build its conventional military capacity.In recent years, China’s military has improvedits offensive and defensive capabilities in theareas of ballistic and cruise missiles, counterspace and offensive cyber capabilities, electronicwarfare systems, surface and submarine warfarecapabilities, and its air force. In 2017, Chinesemilitary expenditures increased another 7 percent.In recent years, China has undertaken aggressiveexpansionist activities in the Asia-Pacific region.In the South China Sea, China has increasedtensions with its regional neighbors and withthe United States by creating artificial islandsin maritime territory claimed by multipleneighboring countries. China is militarizing theseartificial islands, using them to gain control overthe South China Sea’s air and sea lanes, as wellas its extensive underwater natural resources.The Chinese government refuses to accept aninternational arbitration tribunal ruling that Chinadoes not have the maritime territorial sovereigntyit claims over the South China Sea.In the East China Sea, China declared an air‑defenseidentification zone in 2013 in which it requiresthe identification, location, and control of foreignaircraft over what it considers its sovereignairspace or water. China’s self-declared air-defenseidentification zone extends over the Japaneseowned Senkaku Islands. Neither Japan nor theUnites States recognize China’s claims. In addition,the Japanese government has expressed concernover China’s almost daily intrusions into Japaneseair space in 2017.In response to China’s actions, the DoD continuesto fly, sail, and operate throughout the SouthChina and East China Seas, in accordance withinternational law, to demonstrate its commitmentto freedom of navigation and overflight.Furthermore, the DoD is working to enhance5 DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMthe alliance relationships the United Stateshas with countries in the Asia-Pacific region insupport of regional stability and U.S. strategicinterests. In 2014, the United States signed theEnhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement withthe Philippines, which increased U.S. accessto Philippine military bases, and provided fordonations of U.S. maritime vessels to the Philippinemilitary and joint training exercises. In 2015,the United States announced the Southeast AsiaMaritime Security Initiative, a 5-year, 425 millionproject to enhance partner capabilities andcollaboration among Southeast Asia countries,including the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesiaand Malaysia.To expand its global maritime influence, Chinaestablished its first overseas military basein Djibouti in the Horn of Africa. Djibouti isstrategically located on the Strait of Bab el-Mandebbetween the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden whereapproximately 20,000 ships and 20 percent ofglobal exports traverse yearly. China is buildinga facility that will house up to 10,000 Chinesemilitary personnel and provide a logisticsbase for its navy.U.S. intelligence analysts assert that this is a criticalperiod in which China plans to test U.S. militaryand political resolve. The United States and itsallies will need to have a clear response to protectU.S. interests.IRANIran continues to pose a significant global securitythreat to the United States given its regional powerambitions and potential development of a nuclearweapons capability. For example, according to the2017 Defense Posture Statement, Iran supportsthe Assad regime in Syria, backs the militant Shi’aterrorist organization Hezbollah in Syria andLebanon, and contributes to disorder in Yemen.In July 2017, Michael Pompeo, the Director of theCentral Intelligence Agency, described Iran’s useof proxy forces—Hezbollah in Lebanon and Syriaand Shiite militias in Syria and Iraq—to establishU.S. Marine Corps joint terminal attack controllerscommunicate with an MV-22 Osprey during takeoff.(U.S. Marine Corps photo)Iranian dominance along the newly forming ShiiteCrescent stretching from Beirut to Tehran. Iran’sally Hezbollah claims it is “close to achieving thisgoal.” These actions directly threaten Israel andother U.S. allies in the Middle East.In 2015, Iran, the P5 1 (China, France, Russia, theUnited Kingdom, the United States, and Germany),and the European Union agreed to the JointComprehensive Plan of Action, which seeks toensure that Iran’s nuclear program is exclusivelypeaceful in exchange for the United States, theEuropean Union, and the United Nations liftingeconomic sanctions. Under U.S. law, the StateDepartment must notify Congress every 90 daysof Iran’s compliance with the Joint ComprehensivePlan of Action.Because of Iran’s continued testing of ballisticmissiles and direction of hostile actions in theregion, Congress passed legislation in 2017imposing new economic sanctions against Iran.The State Department also stated Iran hasexpanded activities that undermine stability,security, and prosperity in the Middle East, such assupporting the terrorist groups Hezbollah, Hamas,and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Iran also supportsthe government of Syrian President BasharDoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD 6

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMal‑Assad, despite his atrocities against his ownpeople. In Yemen, Iran has provided the Houthirebels with advanced weaponry, which the rebelshave used to attack Saudi Arabia, that threatensfreedom of navigation in the Red Sea. Iran is alsotesting and developing ballistic missiles, in defianceof U.N. Security Council Resolutions.In response to the new economic sanctions,President Hassan Rouhani of Iran warned that itcould start its nuclear program “within hours.”Iran’s parliament also responded by votingoverwhelmingly in favor of legislation to increasethe budget for the country’s ballistic missileprogram and the Revolutionary Guard’s externaloperations arm, the Quds Force.The United States is working with its allies in theMiddle East to contain Iranian aggression andinfluence. In May 2017, the State Departmentannounced a large arms package— 110 billion ofdefense equipment and services—for Saudi Arabiaand other U.S. allies in the Gulf region to supporttheir long-term security “in the face of the malignIranian influence and Iranian-related threats.” TheState Department re-designated Iran 2 months lateras a State Sponsor of Terrorism, a designation it hasheld since 1984.Meanwhile, Iran has taken significant stepsto increase its influence in Iraq. Speaking atthe Aspen Security Forum in July 2017, Iraq’sAmbassador to the United States praised Iran’sprovision of critical supplies in the fight againstISIS. He stated that Iran has enhanced its influencetoday in Iraq because other Arab nations weremissing when Iraq needed their support againstISIS. Recently, however, Saudi Arabia has initiatedtalks with Iraq pursuant to an economic agreementto help reconstruct the country post-ISIS.Notwithstanding its current support of Iraq todefeat ISIS, Iranian influence in Iraq could makeit more difficult for Iraq to assert its sovereigntyand maintain its independence as it attemptsto reconcile competing sectarian interests andestablish stable governance. Currently, Iranian-A U.S. Marine Corps humvee enters the beach to board aLanding Craft Utility 1651 in order to transfer personneland equipment. (U.S. Navy photo)backed Shia Popular Mobilization Forces ofconsiderable size and reach operate in Iraq tosupport the anti-ISIS campaign. The Government ofIraq has officially incorporated some of these ShiaPopular Mobilization Forces into the Iraqi SecurityForces. Iran has warned the Iraqi governmentnot to weaken these Iranian-backed Shia forces,which, so far, have avoided conflict with U.Smilitary personnel.TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMCountering transnational terrorism remains a keyU.S. national security challenge. Despite heightenedU.S., European, and other allies’ focus oncombatting terrorism following al-Qaeda’s attack onthe United States on September 11, 2001, terroristorganizations have proliferated throughout theworld and present a global threat.These terrorist organizations include Boko Haramin Nigeria and Chad; al-Shabab in Somalia; alQaeda in Syria, Yemen, and Afghanistan; the IslamicMaghreb in North Africa; and ISIS in Iraq, Syria,Libya, Afghanistan, Egypt, and the Philippines.Tens of thousands of young Muslims have migratedacross nation-state borders to join the terroristorganizations, especially into Syria and Iraq, withan estimated 3,000 – 5,000 from Western Europeand the United States alone.These terrorist organizations continue to pose asignificant destabilizing force. ISIS, in particularand those it has inspired, has carried out multipleterrorist attacks in Europe and in the United States.7 DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD

COUNTERING STRATEGIC CHALLENGES: NORTH KOREA, RUSSIA, CHINA, IRAN, AND TRANSNATIONAL TERRORISMISIS recently directed its adherents to attacktourists anywhere in the world using a SUV ortruck as its principal weapon.While each terrorist organization has a uniquehistory, procedures, and motivation based on localgrievances, the common thread linking them isadherence to interpretations of extremist versionsof Islam that justify violence.However, the so-called Islamic Caliphate establishedby ISIS in Iraq and Syria is on the verge of defeat.In June 2017, after a 9-month battle, Iraqi SecurityForces, backed by U.S. and Coalition air and specialoperations forces, liberated Mosul, Iraq’s secondlargest city. In August 2017, Kurdish and Arabmilitary forces, supported by U.S. and Coalition airand special operations forces, entered Raqqa, Syria,the “capital” of the so-called Islamic Caliphate.However, the military success against ISIS inSyria and Iraq is driving some of the survivingISIS fighters into other ungoverned spaces aroundthe world, fueling the spread of transnationalterrorism. The prospect of radicalized foreignfighters returning to their home countries tofurther spread ISIS influence and stage attacksposes a significant challenge to the United Statesand its allies.Special Presidential Envoy for the Global Coalitionto Counter ISIS, Ambassador Brett McGurk, statedthat the long-term key to preempting ISIS andother terrorist attacks after the military phase ofdefeating the so-called Islamic Caliphate in Iraqand Syria is to share information among the U.S.coalition of 69 countries. He noted that this willrequire increased emphasis on law enforcement andintelligence gathering to build a global database ofknown terrorists.In addition to Iraq and Syria, the DoD is conductingmilitary operations with allies against terroristgroups throughout the world, especially in severalfragile or failed states. For example, GeneralRaymond A. Thomas III, Commander, U.S. SpecialOperations Command, recently stated that forcesunder his command, along with local proxies,eliminated approximately 1,500 ISIS terroristsin Libya after ISIS established a presence therein 2015. He said that his teams operate globallyagainst terrorists, anywhere a significant threatexists. In addition, U.S. forces are providingcritical support and assistance to the PhilippineSecurity Forces as they combat ISIS in the southernregion of Mindanao.The DoD is also undertaking increased securitycooperation initiatives in the Middle East andin other regions to enhance our alliances andbuild our partners’ military capability to defendthemselves against Islamist extremist terroristattacks. For example, on May 15, 2017, the DoDannounced a new bilateral defense cooperationagreement with the United Arab Emirates ona range of shared regional security threats,including the ongoing Iranian, Al-Qaeda, or ISISbacked instability in Yemen and Libya, and thecampaign to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. The StateDepartment also announced that the United Statesand Saudi Arabia are embarking on a numberof new initiatives “to counter violent extremistmessaging,” which will include opening a newGlobal Center for Combatting Extremist Ideology.A recent DoD OIG evaluation reported that DoDand State Department global efforts to buildpartner-country counterterrorism capacity throughtraining and equipping programs have reachedover 70 nations through the congressionally fundedSection 2282 program.In summary, transnational terrorism presents along-term global threat. International institutionsand governments must work to resolve theunderlying conditions that led to the rise andcontinued propagation of violent extremism.These conditions result from the collapse of stateeconomies and effective governance, sectarianand religious civil wars, and political and socialalienation among the young in the countries inwhich the ideology has taken root.DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD 8

ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS IN IRAQ/SYRIA AND AFGHANISTANIraqi federal police load artillery in support of the fight against ISIS near Hawijah, Iraq. (U.S. Army photo)9 DoD OIG FY 2018 Summary of Management and Performance Challenges Facing the DoD

ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN OVERSEAS CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS IN IRAQ/SYRIA AND AFGHANISTANChallenge 2: Addressing Challengesin Overseas Contingency Operationsin Iraq, Syria, and AfghanistanThe U.S. Government is engaged in two overseas contingency operations:(1) Operation Inherent Resolve (the effort to degrade and defeat the IslamicState of Iraq and the Levant [ISIS] in Iraq a

Dec 01, 2017 · weapons and ballistic missile technologies, and its role in their proliferation, presents a growing strategic threat to U.S. forces in the region and to the U.S. mainland, as well as to North Korea’s neighbors, South Korea and Japan. The United States is pressuring North Korea to

Related Documents:

The US DoD has two PKI: DoD PKI is their internal PKI; DoD ECA PKI is the PKI for people outside of the DoD [External Certification Authority] who need to communicate with the DoD [i.e. you]. Fortunately, the DoD has created a tool for Microsoft to Trust the DoD PKI and ECA PKI; the DoD PKE InstallRoot tool.File Size: 1MBPage Count: 10

The DoD PKI consists of the US DoD issuing certificates internally to US DoD end entities (like DoD employees and DoD web sites). The ECA PKI consists of vendors that are authorized by the US DoD to issue certificates to end entities outside of the US DoD that need to communicate with the DoD. You probably need to trust both the DoD PKI and ECA .

version of Outlook: 1. Open Microsoft Outlook, and select the "Home" tab. What is the DoD ID Number? The DoD ID Number is a unique number assigned to all U.S Department of Defense (DoD) Civilian, U.S. Military, and DoD Contract personnel with a Common Access Card (CAC). For these personnel, their DoD ID number is synonymous with their

that authenticate to a physical access control system (PACS). (45) All DoD and non-DoD entities (human and non-person) . Mapping an authenticated identity to a network or information system account or . (DIACAP),” November 28, 2007 (n) DoD Instruction 8510.01, “Risk Management Framework (RMF) for DoD Information .

DoD 7000.14-R, DoD Financial Regulation b. DoD 4000.25-7-M, Military Standard Billing System (MILSBILLS) c. DoD 4000.25-M, Volume 5 – Finance d. DODI 4140.01, DOD Supply Chain Materiel Management Policy e. 4000.25-10-M, Defense A

DoD families. Since then, the Marine Corps’ Third Echelon Test Set (TETS), and the Joint Service Electronic Combat Test Systems Tester (JSECST) have been added to the list of approved DoD Family Testers. DoD 5000.2-R was first published on 15 March 1996 and stated DoD ATS policy: “DoD

Jun 17, 2020 · The DoD OIG provided the DoD three memorandums with best practices and lessons learned and proactively encouraged individuals to report to the DoD Hotline concerns or complaints related to the DoD’s

Defense Enterprise E-mail) for non-dual persona personnel with DoD PIV authentication certificate (and its 16-digit Federal derived User Principal Name (UPN)), rather than DoD E mail signing certificate (and its DoD-derived 10 digit UPN, i.e., DoD ID Number). 2. Any DoD UNCLASSIFIED websit