Effect Of Variable Viscosity On Convective Heat And Mass .

2y ago
8 Views
2 Downloads
763.18 KB
9 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Giovanna Wyche
Transcription

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. SenthilvadivuEffect of Variable Viscosity on Convective Heat and Mass Transfer byNatural Convection from Vertical Surface in Porous MediumM.B.K.MOORTHY1, K.SENTHILVADIVU21Department of Mathematics, Institute of Road and Transport Technology,Erode – 638316, Tamilnadu, India. E-mail: mbk.moorthy@yahoo.com2Department of Mathematics, K.S.Rangasamy College of Technology,Tiruchengode - 637215, Tamilnadu, India. E-mail: senthilveera47@rediffmail.comCorresponding author: K.Senthilvadivu, Ph no: 91 98650 24343,E-mail: senthilveera47@rediffmail.comAbstract: - The aim of this paper is to investigate the effect of variable viscosity on free convective heat andmass transfer from a vertical plate embedded in a saturated porous medium. The governing equations ofcontinuity, momentum, energy and concentration are transformed into non linear ordinary differential equationsusing similarity transformations and then solved by using Runge – Kutta – Gill method along with shootingtechnique. Governing parameters for the problem under study are the variable viscosity, the buoyancy ratio andthe Lewis number. The velocity, temperature and concentration distributions are presented and discussed. TheNusselt and Sherwood number are also derived. The numerical values of local Nusselt and local Sherwoodnumbers have also been computed for a wide range of governing parameters. The viscous and thermalboundary layer thicknesses are discussedKey-Words: - Free convection, Heat transfer, Mass transfer, Variable viscosity, Porous medium.[7] investigated the effect of steady free convectionflow with variable viscosity and thermal diffusivityalong a vertical plate. Yih [8] analyzed the coupledheat and mass transfer in mixed convection about awedge for variable wall temperature andconcentration. Rami.Y.Jumah et al. [9] studied thecoupled heat and mass transfer for non-Newtonianfluids. Kumari [10] analyzed the effect of variableviscosity on free and mixed convection boundarylayer flow from a horizontal surface in a saturatedporous medium. Postelnicu et al. [11] investigatedthe effect of variable viscosity on forced convectionover a horizontal flat plate in a porous medium withinternal heat generation. Seddeek [15, 16] studiedthe effects of chemical reaction, variable viscosity,and thermal diffusivity on mixed convection heatand mass transfer through porous media. MohamedE- Ali [17] studied the effect of variable viscosityon mixed convection along a vertical plate. Alam etal [18] analyzed the study of the combined free –forced convection and mass transfer flow past avertical porous plate in a porous medium with heatgeneration and thermal diffusion. Pantokratoras [19]analyzed the effect of variable viscosity withconstant wall temperature. Seddeek et al. [20]1 IntroductionIn recent years the combined heat and mass transferby natural convection in a fluid saturated porousmedium has its own role in many engineeringapplication problems such as nuclear reactor design,geothermal systems, petroleum engineeringapplications, evaporation at the surface of a waterbody, energy transfer in a wet cooling tower and theflow in a desert cooler. A comprehensive account ofthe available information in this field is provided inrecent books by Ingham et al [13] and Vafai[14]Kassoy [1] studied the effect of variable viscosity onthe onset of convection in porous medium. Chengand Minkowyz [2] studied the effect of freeconvection about a vertical plate embedded in aporous medium with application to heat transferfrom a dike. Bejan and Khair [3] studied thebuoyancy induced heat and mass transfer from avertical plate embedded in a saturated porousmedium. Lai and Kulacki [5] studied the coupledheat and mass transfer by natural convection fromvertical surface in a porous medium. The sameauthors [6] also studied the effect of variableviscosity on convection heat transfer along a verticalsurface in a saturated porous medium. ElbashbeshyE-ISSN: 2224-2880751Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. Senthilvadivustudied the effects of chemical reaction, variableviscosity, on hydro magnetic mixed convection heatand mass transfer through porous media. Singh et al.[21] used integral treatment to obtain theexpressions for Nusselt number and Sherwoodnumber. Recently the authors analysed the effect ofvariable viscosity on convective heat and masstransfer by natural from horizontal surface in porousmedium.The purpose of the present work is to studythe effect of variable viscosity on heat and masstransfer along a vertical surface embedded in asaturated porous medium.3. Method of solution2. Analysis kgβ Tx Ra x is the Rayleigh number να Introducing the stream function Ψ (x, y) such that ψ ψ,v u (10) y xwhereu v uuκ p ρg µ x κµ p y c c 2c v D x y y 2{}T T Tw T (13)φ c c cw c (14)(1)andN (2)Substitution of these transformations (10) to (15) toequations (2) to (5) along with the equations (6) and(7), there results the non linear ordinary differentialequations,f ′′ µ 1µ {1 γ (T T )}E-ISSN: 2224-2880(15)(16)1fθ ′2Le 1φ ′′ (5)(17)1fφ ′2(18)together with the boundary conditions(6)η 0, f 0,θ 1,φ 1(19)η , f ′ 0,θ 0,φ 0(20)where(7)Le αistheLewisnumberandDθ r 1 γ (T T )w which is reasonable for liquids such as water and oil.Here γ is a constant.The boundary conditions are y 0, v 0, T Tw , c cwy , u 0, T T , c c β (cw c )β (Tw T ) θ θr f ′θ ′ (θ ′ φ ′N ) θ θ r θ r θ ′′ The viscosity of the fluid is assumed to be aninverse linear function of temperature and can beexpressed as1(12)θ (4)ρ ρ 1 β (T T ) β (c c )y(Ra x ) 1 2xDefine(3) 2T T T α v y x y 2(11)η Consider a vertical surface embedded in a saturatedporous medium. The properties of the fluid andporous medium are isotropic and the viscosity of thefluid is assumed to be an inverse linear function oftemperature. Using Boussinesq and boundary layerapproximations, the governing equations ofcontinuity, momentum, energy and concentrationare given by u v 0 x y1ψ αf ( Ra x ) 2is the parameter characterizing theinfluence of viscosity. For a given temperaturedifference, large values of θ r implies either γ or(Tw -T ) are small. In this case the effect of variableviscosity can be neglected.The effect of variable viscosity is important ifθ r is small. Since the viscosity of liquids decreaseswith increasing temperature while it increases forgases, θ r is negative for liquids and positive for(8)(9)752Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. Senthilvadivugases. The concept of this parameter θ r was firstintroduced by Ling and Dybbs [4] in their study offorced convection flow in porous media. Theparameter N measures the relative importance ofmass and thermal diffusion in the buoyancy – drivenflow. It is clear that N is zero for thermal- drivenflow, infinite for mass driven flow, positive foraiding flow and negative for opposing flow. It maynote that in the absence of mass transfer, theequations (16) and (17) together with the boundaryconditions (19) and (20) reduce to that obtained byLai and Kulacki [5].The heat transfer coefficient in terms of theNusselt number is given byNu x θ ′(0 )(Ra x ) 1 2plate as N 0 for opposing flows (N 0) for givenvalues of θ r and Le. From Fig.4 it is realized thatthe temperature and concentration decreases asN 0 for opposing flows (N 0) and increases asN 0 for aiding flows (N 0) for given values ofθ r and Le.(21)The mass transfer coefficient in terms of theSherwood number is given bySh x(Ra x ) 1 2 φ ′(0 )(22)Results and discussionFig.1.Velocity profiles for different values of θ r forN 1 and Le 1The equations (16), (17) and (18) are integratednumerically by using Runge – Kutta – Gill methodalong with shooting technique. The parametersinvolved in this problem are: θ r – the variableviscosity, Le- Lewis number and N-the buoyancyparameter. To observe the effect of variableviscosity on heat and mass transfer we have plottedthe velocity functionf ', temperature function θand concentration function Φ against η for variousvalues of θ r , Le and N.The effect of variable viscosity θ r on velocity,temperature and concentration are shown in figures1 and 2. It is realized that the velocity increases nearthe plate and decreases away from the plate asθ r 0 in the case of liquids ( θ r 0) and decreasesnear the plate and increases away from the plate asθ r 0 in the case of gases ( θ r 0 ) for given valuesof N and Le. From Fig.2 it is evident that thetemperature and concentration increases as θ r 0for θ r 0(i.e. for gases) and decreases as θ r 0 forθ r 0(i.e. for liquids) for other values are fixed.The effect of buoyancy ratio N on velocity,temperature and concentration are shown in figures3 and 4. From Fig.3 it is observed that the velocitydecreases near the plate and increases away from theplate as N 0 for aiding flows (N 0) andincreases near the plate and decreases away from theE-ISSN: 2224-2880Fig.2.Temperature and Concentration profiles fordifferent values of θ r for N 1 and Le 1753Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. SenthilvadivuFrom Fig.7 it is realized that as the Lewisnumber Le decreases, the concentration decreasesfor fixed values of θ r and N.Fig.8 illustrates the effect of variable viscosity θ ron the slip velocity f'(0) for different values of thebuoyancy ratio N for given value of Le. It isobserved that the slip velocity decreases as θ r 0 inthe case of gases (for θ r 0) but in the cases ofliquids ( θ r 0) the slip velocity increases as θ r 0for aiding (N 0), thermal-driven (N 0) andopposing (N 0) flows. These observations areobviously same as drawn in Table 1.Fig. 3.Velocity profiles for different values of Nfor θ r 5 and Le 1Fig. 5.Velocity profiles for different values of Lefor θ r 5 and N 1Fig.4.Temperature and Concentration profiles fordifferent values of N for θ r 5 and Le 1The effect of Lewis number Le on velocity,temperature and concentration are shown in figures5, 6 and 7. From Fig.5 it is evident that as the Lewisnumber Le decreases, the velocity decreases forgiven values of θ r and N. From Fig.6 it is observedthat as Le increases, the temperature decreases forfixed values of θ r and N.E-ISSN: 2224-2880Fig. 6.Temperature profiles for different values ofLe for θ r 5 and N 1754Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. 0.3540.3340.318-0.1Slip velocity1250.637 1.1415 2.1235 4.2370.7666 1.7036 2.5554 5.11080.8730 1.9401 2.9102 5.82041.1752 2.6115 3.9173 7.83471.0363 2.3033.4546 6.9090.9271 2.0601 3.0901 6.1803Nusselt and Sherwood 11.1016Table1. Numerical values of slip velocity, Nusseltand Sherwood numbers for different values of N andθ r for Le 1.Fig.7.Concentration profiles for different values ofLe for θ r 5 and N 1Fig.9.Effect of variable viscosity θ r and buoyancyratio N on heat and mass transfer rates for Le 1Fig.9 displays the variation of local Nusselt andSherwood numbers at the surface with variableviscosity θ r covering aiding flows (N 0)andopposing flows (N 0) for fixed value of Le. It isevident that the heat transfer and mass transfer ratesdecreases as θ r 0 for θ r 0 and increases asθ r 0 for θ r 0 for both aiding and opposing flows.This is also evident from Table 1. Similar behaviourFig. 8.Effect of variable viscosity θ r and buoyancyratio N on the slip velocity for Le 1E-ISSN: 2224-2880755Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. Senthilvadivuvalue of N. It is realized that as Lewis numberincreases the heat transfer decreases for both θ r 0and θ r 0. This is also evident from Table 2has also been observed for the case of horizontalplate by the same authors [22].Fig.10.Effect of variable viscosity θ r and Lewisnumber Le on the slip velocity for N 6Slip velocity371501.415 1.4515 1.4717 1.49541.7036 1.7228 1.733 1.74551.9401 1.9442 1.946 1.94882.6116 2.5672 2.5439 2.5182.3031 2.2818 2.2704 2.25792.062.0562.053 2.0513Nusselt and Sherwood 8Table 2. Numerical values of slip velocity andNusselt number for different values of Le and θ r forN 1.Fig.12 gives the effect of variable viscosity θ r onmass transfer for different values of Le and for fixedvalue of N .It is clearly seen that as Lewis numberincreases the mass transfer increases for both θ r 0and θ r 0.This result is obviously same as drawn inTable 3.Fig.11.Effect of variable viscosity θ r and Lewisnumber Le on the heat transfer rate for N 1Fig.10 gives the effect of variable viscosity θ r onthe slip velocity f '(0) for different values of theLewis number Le and for fixed value of N. It isobserved that as Lewis number increases the slipvelocity decreases for θ r 0 and increases for θ r 0.This observation is obviously same from Table 2.Fig.12. Effect of variable viscosity θ r and Lewisnumber Le on mass transfer rate for N 1Fig.11 gives the effect of variable viscosity θ r onheat transfer for different values of Le and for fixedE-ISSN: 2224-2880756Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSLeθr51050-5-10-50M. B. K. Moorthy, K. le viscosity ( θ r ), Lewis number (Le) andbuoyancy ratio (N). The heat transfer and masstransfer increase as N increases for both positive andnegative values of θ r . The heat transfer increasesand mass transfer decreases as Lewis numberincreases for both positive and negative values of θ r .The heat transfer andmass transfer ratesdecreases as θ r 0 for θ r 0 and increases asθ r 0 for θ r 0 for both aiding and opposing flows.Table.3 Numerical values of Sherwood number fordifferent values of Le and θ r for N 1Nomenclaturec – Concentration at any point in the flow fieldcw – concentration at the wallc -concentration at the free streamD - Mass diffusivityf - Dimensionless velocity functiong - Acceleration due to gravityK- PermeabilityLe –Lewis number [Le α / D]The viscous and thermal boundary layerthicknesses are presented in Table 4 for differentvalues of θ r , N and for fixed value of Le. It isobserved that the viscous and thermal boundarylayer thicknesses increase as θ r 0 for θ r 0 anddecrease as θ r 0 for θ r 0 for both aiding (N 0)and opposing(N 0) 4378.875-0.1Slip velocity12N- Buoyancy ratio [ 3.68753.25003.43753.6250]Shx Sherwood numberShx mx / D (c w c )p – Pressure kgβ Tx Rax –Rayleigh number Ra x να T - Temperature of the fluidTw - Temperature of the plateT - Temperature of the fluid far from the plateu,v – velocity components in x and y directionx, y - Co-ordinate system3.00002.75002.62502.31252.43752.5625Greek lettersα - Thermal diffusivityβ- Coefficient of thermal expansionβ*-Concentration expansion coefficientγ- Constant defined in equation (7)η - Dimensionless similarity variableθ - Dimensionless temperatureθ r - - 1/ γ (Tw - T )µ - viscosity [pas]ν- Kinematic viscosityρ – Densityф -Dimensionless concentrationψ - Dimensionless stream functionTable.4. Values of Viscous and Thermal boundarylayer thicknesses for different values of N and θ r forLe 1.4. ConclusionFor coupled heat and mass transfer by naturalconvection in porous media, solutions have beenpresented for the case of vertical surface with lineartemperature and concentration distribution. Thegoverning parameters of the problem are theE-ISSN: 2224-2880β (cw c )β (Tw T )Nux- Nusselt number[ Nu x x( T / y )y 0 / (Tw T ) ]7.1875.6254.9317 3.8756.8750 5.3125 4.6875 3.68756.5625 5.1250 4.5003.5006.0625 4.6875 4.0625 3.18756.254.8750 4.253.31256.5005.0625 4.3750 3.4375Nusselt and Sherwood number-0.11257.68757.12506.75005.93756.31256.6250 757Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. Senthilvadivumedia, Int. Comm. Heat Mass Transfer, 27, 4,(2000), pp.485-494.[10] M. Kumari, Variable viscosity effects on freeand mixed convection boundary layer flow froma horizontal surface in a saturated porousmedium- variable heat flux, Mech. Res. Commun.28, (2001), pp.339-348.[11] A. Postelnicu, T. Grosan, I. Pop, The effect ofvariable viscosity on forced convection over ahorizontal flat plate in a porous medium withinternal heat generation, Mech. Res. Commun. 28,(2001), pp.331-337[12] I. Pop and D. B Ingham, Convective heattransfer: Mathematical and computationalmodeling of viscous fluids and porous media,Pergamon, oxford, (2001).[13] D. B. Ingham and I. Pop, Transportphenomena in porous media III, Elsevier, Oxford,(2005).[14] K.Vafai, Handbook of Porous media (2ndedition), Taylor and Francis, New York, (2005).[15] M. A. Seddeek, Finite element method for theeffects of chemical reaction, variable viscosity,thermophoresis and heat generation/ absorptionon a boundary layer hydro magnetic flow withheat and mass transfer over a heat surface, ActaMech., 177, (2005a), pp.1- 18.[16] M. A. Seddeek, A. M. Salem, Laminar mixedconvection adjacent to vertical continuouslystretching sheet with variable viscosity andvariable thermal diffusivity, Int. J. Heat andMass Transfer, 41, (2005 b) , pp.1048-1055.[17] Mohamed E. Ali, The effect of variableviscosity on mixed convection heat transferalong a vertical moving surface, Int. J. ofThermal Sciences, 45, (2006), pp 60-69.[18] M. S. Alam, M. M. Rahman, and M. A. Samad,Numerical study of the combined free – forcedconvection and Mass transfer flow past a verticalporous plate in a porous medium with heatgeneration and thermal diffusion, Non linearAnalysis Modeling and Control,11, 4,(2006) pp331-343.[19] A. Pantokratoras, The Falkner -skan flow withconstant wall temperature and variable viscosity,Int. J. of Thermal Sciences, 45, (2006), pp 378389.[20] A. Seddeek, A. A.Darwish, M. S. Abdelmeguid,Effect of chemical reaction and variable viscosityon hydro magnetic mixed convection heat andmass transfer for Hiemenz flow through porousmedia with radiation, Commun. Nonlinear. Sci.Numer Simul., 12, (2007c), pp.195-213.AcknowledgementThe authors tender their heartfelt thanks toDr.T.Govindarajulu former Professor and Head ofDepartment of Mathematics, Anna University,Chennai for his generous help. The authors wish tothank the Director and the Principal, IRTT for theirkind support. The authors wish to thank Dr. K.Thyagarajah, Principal, K. S. R. College ofTechnology for his help and guidance to do thisworkReferences[1] D. R. Kassoy and A. Zebib, Variable viscosityeffects on the onset of convection in porousmedia, Physics Fluids, 18, (1975) , pp.16491651.[2] P. Cheng and W. J. Minkowycz, Freeconvection about a vertical plate embedded in aporous medium with application to heat transferfrom a dike, J. Geophys. Res., 82, (1977), pp2040-2044.[3] A. Bejan and K. R. Khair. Heat and masstransfer by natural convection in a porousmedium, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 28, 5,(1985), pp. 909-918.[4] J.X. Ling and A. Dybbs, Forced convectionover a flat plate submersed in a porous medium:variable viscosity case, ASME paper 87WA/HT – 23, American Society of MechanicalEngineers, New York (1987).[5] F. C. Lai and F. A. Kulacki, The effect ofvariable viscosity on convection heat transferalong a vertical surface in a saturated porousmedium, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 33, (1990),pp.1028- 1031.[6] F. C. Lai and F. A. Kulacki, Coupled heat andmass transfer by natural convection fromvertical surfaces in porous media, Int. J. HeatMass Transfer , 34,4/5 (1991), pp. 1189- 1991[7] E. M. A. Elbashbeshy and F. N. Ibrahim, Steadyfree convection flow with variable viscosity andthermal diffusivity along a vertical plate, J. Phys.D. Appl. Phys., 26 (1993), pp. 2137-2143.[8] K. A. Yih, Coupled heat and mass transfer inmixed convection over a wedge with variablewall temperature and concentration in porousmedia: the entire regime, Int. Comm. Heat MassTransfer, 25, 8, (1998), pp.1145-1158.[9] Rami. Y. Jumah and Arun S. Mujumdar, Freeconvection heat and mass transfer of nonNewtonian power law fluids with yield stressfrom a vertical flat plate in saturated porousE-ISSN: 2224-2880758Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS on MATHEMATICSM. B. K. Moorthy, K. Senthilvadivu[21] B. B Singh and I.M. Chandarki, Integraltreatment of coupled heat and mass transfer bynatural convection from a cylinder in porousmedia, Int. J. Comm.in Heat and Mass Transfer,36, (2009), pp. 269- 273.[22] M. B. K. Moorthy and K. Senthilvadivu, Effectof variable viscosity on convective heat andmass transferby natural convection fromhorizontal surface in porous medium, WSEASTransactions on Mathematics, 10, (2011), pp.210-218E-ISSN: 2224-2880759Issue 9, Volume 11, September 2012

convection about a vertical plate embedded in a porous medium with application to heat transfer from a dike. Bejan and Khair [3] studied the buoyancy induced heat and mass transfer from a vertical plate embedded in a saturated porous medium. Lai and Kulacki [5] studied the coupled heat and mass tran

Related Documents:

Viscosity 5 Viscosity coefficients Viscosity coefficients can be defined in two ways: Dynamic viscosity, also absolute viscosity, the more usual one (typical units Pa·s, Poise, P); Kinematic viscosity is the dynamic viscosity divided by the density (typical units m2/s, Stokes, St). Viscosity is a tensorial qua

Viscosity is the ratio of absolute or dynamic viscosity to density - a quantity in which no force is involved. Kinematic viscosity can be obtained by dividing the absolute viscosity of a fluid by its mass density R H N , (1) where ν - kinematic viscosity, η - absolute or dynamic viscosity, ρ - density.

a Cold Viscosity System a Cold Viscosity Blend a Hot Viscosity System x Hot Wiscosity Blend i - Poly. (Hot Viscosity System) i-Poly. (Cold Viscosity System) --Poly. (Hot Viscosity Blend) - Poly. (Cold Viscosity Blend) U.S. Patent May 28, 2013 Sheet 2 of 5 US 8.450,294 B2 FIG. 2

Viscosity Index (VI) defines the viscosity relationship with temperature. The Viscosity of low VI oils change significantly with temperature The Viscosity of high VI oils changes much less with temperature 30 120 VI 50 0 100 150 0 VI 200 250 40 50 60 70 80 Temperature, C 90 100 110 300 K i n ema t i V is c o s i t y, m m 2 /s Same at .

solution viscosity.14,26 Galush et al.26 presented a study on the viscosity of mixed protein solutions, using mixtures of different monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and of one mAb with BSA. Their conclusions derived from measuring the viscosity of both the individual protein solutions and blends. They proposed that the viscosity

1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Meaning of tribology 2 Lubrication 3 Wear 5 1.3 Cost of friction and wear 5 1.4 Summary 7 References 8 2 PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF LUBRICANTS 11 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Oil viscosity 11 Dynamic viscosity 12 Kinematic viscosity 13 2.3 Viscosity temperature relationship 13 Viscosity-temperature equations 14

Saybolt Viscosity A measure of kinematic viscosity. To convert from SSU to St., apply the following for-mula for SSU 100: St. .00220(SSU) – 1.35/t. Relative Viscosity For a fluid polymer solution, the ratio of solution viscosity to solvent viscosity at

Brine Solutions & CO2 Analysis Other Applications . Viscosity”, 2010, Cambridge Viscosity-Schlumberger Roundtable Workshop on High Pressure and High Temperature Viscosity Standards . 9 Accurate Viscosity Data: i