Five Deming Principles That Help . - Health Catalyst

3y ago
31 Views
2 Downloads
384.98 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 29d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Francisco Tran
Transcription

InsightsFive Deming Principles that Help HealthcareProcess ImprovementBy Dr. John HaughomWe all know healthcareis very complex, but it’sreally not fundamentallydifferent from otherindustries. Healthcarecomprises simplythousands of interlinkedprocesses that resultin a very complexsystem. If we focus onthe processes of careone at a time, we canfundamentally changethe game and deal withthe challenges facinghealthcare.There are few people who have had more impact on the scienceand practical application of process management than W. EdwardsDeming. His impact on the automotive industry is legendary, andmany other industries have tried, with varying degrees of success,to implement his principles, as well. For years, I have followed andadmired those who have tried to bring his quality improvementprocesses to healthcare. I strongly believe that healthcare has muchto gain by successfully implementing key Deming principles. Let meshare five principles that I believe are making the biggest differencein healthcare process improvement.1Quality improvement is the science of process management.When Deming and others developed their approach to modernquality improvement starting in the 1940s, they were basicallydeveloping a way for modern organizations to deal with thecomplex challenges that were confronting them. The approachthey developed to improvement was remarkably simple, yetextraordinarily powerful. It was centered on the fact that qualityimprovement was really about process management. Thesequality improvement concepts and techniques have beenused to transform almost every major industry in the world,with dramatic results. The last holdouts, the last bastions ofresistance, have primarily been healthcare, higher education,and government. Now, it’s happening to healthcare. I believehigher education is imminent; it’s anyone’s guess whethergovernment will ever succumb to these forces.Now, we all know healthcare is very complex, but it’s reallynot fundamentally different from other industries. Healthcarecomprises simply thousands of interlinked processes that resultin a very complex system. If we focus on the processes of careone at a time, we can fundamentally change the game and dealwith the challenges facing healthcare. Now, this may seem likea tall order, but Pareto’s principle tells us there are probably20% of those processes that will get us 80% of the impact.So the challenge of every organization is to identify that 20%,roll up its sleeves, and begin the important work of addressingthose challenges.Copyright 2017 Health Catalyst1

2For quality control in healthcare, if you cannot measure it—youcannot improve it.Deming clearly understood the importance of data. Meaningfulquality improvement must be data-driven. This is particularly truefor quality control in healthcare. You’re basically dead in thewater if you try to work with healthcare providers and you don’thave good data. I think everybody recognizes that.Managing care meansmanaging the processesof care. It does not meanmanaging physicians andnurses. What Brent saidis very true. One of thebig mistakes made in the90’s with the “managedcare” movement wasnaively thinking thatmanaging care meanttelling physicians andnurses what to do.I love this quote from Deming because he understood thatreality. He said, “In God we trust and all others must bringdata.” I’ve had physicians during my career tell me pretty muchthe same thing, only they’re not quite so polite. They basicallysay, “Dr. Haughom, John, get lost. Bring the data. And then we’lldecide whether or not we believe it.” So, data is critical if we’regoing to have a meaningful impact in healthcare.3Managed care means managing the processes of care, notmanaging physicians and nurses.My good friend, Brent James, put forward an importantapplication, or clarification, of a Deming principle. Managingcare means managing the processes of care. It does not meanmanaging physicians and nurses. What Brent said is very true.One of the big mistakes made in the 90’s with the “managed care”movement was naively thinking that managing care meant tellingphysicians and nurses what to do. The reality is that you need toengage clinicians in the process because they understand thecare delivery process and they are best equipped to figure outhow to improve the process of care over time. And for this reason,I strongly believe that these changes will ultimately be veryempowering for all clinicians who try to get involved.4The right data in the right format at the right time in the righthands.If clinicians are going to manage care, they definitely need data.They need the right data delivered in the right format at the righttime and in the right place. And the data has to be delivered intothe right hands—the clinicians who operate and improve anygiven process of care.5Engaging the “smart cogs” of healthcare.If quality improvement is going to work in healthcare, if we aregoing to realize value, it means we have to engage clinicians.To use Deming’s term, clinicians are healthcare’s so-called“smart cogs.” They are the frontline workers who understandCopyright 2017 Health Catalyst2

McKinsey surveyeda large number ofphysicians and foundthat 84% said they werewilling to change as longas a reasonable argumentcould be made thatchange was necessaryand own the processes of care. I believe we’re very fortunatein healthcare because we have a workforce dominated byclinicians who are extraordinarily committed, very intelligent, andhighly educated.But we live in a pristine time. I received an email once from afellow physician leader at a leading national delivery system. I’mgoing to withhold the name of the delivery system, but if you askknowledgeable people to list the top 10 delivery systems in thecountry, almost everyone would put this organization on theirlist. Notwithstanding, this physician wrote to me lamenting howdifficult it was for him to get his peer physicians to see a newfuture. And in his email, he succinctly described the problem bysaying that his physicians were “historically encumbered anddemoralized.” And I love the succinctness of his descriptionbecause he is basically saying they’re clinging to the past andare demoralized because they don’t see a new future. And in thatshort phrase, this very excellent physician leader pretty muchencapsulated the problem and points us toward the solution.Are Physicians Willing to Change?A McKinsey survey done about two years ago clearly demonstratesthat the majority of physicians are, in fact, willing to change.McKinsey surveyed a large number of physicians and found that 84%said they were willing to change as long as a reasonable argumentcould be made that change was necessary.Copyright 2017 Health Catalyst3

So, how do we reconcile this? I believe we need to help clinicianslearn how to give up the past by seeing a new future. And we needto help them understand their role in creating and sustaining that newfuture. I believe one can make a very strong case that the future willbe very empowering for clinicians of all types if we can successfullyinform them, engage them, and inspire them. By applying thesekey Deming principles to healthcare process improvement, everyhealthcare organization can show the workforce why change isnecessary, what they need to understand in order to participate inmeaningful change, and how success will ultimately look.Resources3 Steps to Prioritize Clinical Quality Improvement in quality-improvement-inhealthcareQuality Improvement in Healthcare: Where is the Best Place toStart? -inhealthcare-start-with-healthcare-data7 Tips for Increasing Physician Engagement ciansABOUT HEALTH CATALYST Health Catalyst is a mission-driven data warehousing, analytics, andoutcomes improvement company that helps healthcare organizationsof all sizes perform the clinical, financial, and operational reportingand analysis needed for population health and accountable care.Our proven enterprise data warehouse (EDW) and analytics platformhelps improve quality, add efficiency and lower costs in support ofmore than 50 million patients for organizations ranging from thelargest US health system to forward-thinking physician practices.For more information, visit www.healthcatalyst.com, and follow us onTwitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook.Copyright 2017 Health Catalyst4

About the AuthorJohn Haughom, MD is an experienced healthcareexecutive with proven expertise in technology-enabledinnovation, developing results-oriented strategic plans,leading multifaceted organization-wide change, anddirecting complex operations. He has a strong record ofturning vision into effective strategies and successfullyimplementing initiatives resulting in value includinghigher quality, safer care at the lowest possible cost.His broad knowledge of healthcare and emerging healthcare technologiesis coupled with his recognized leadership abilities, strong communicationskills, and demonstrated ability to contribute to organizational goals suchas improved clinical outcomes, lower costs, improved access to care, andincreased profitability. After practicing for 15 years as an internist andgastroenterologist, Dr. Haughom assumed a senior executive role withresponsibilities for system-wide automation, budgeting, customer support,database administration, healthcare delivery, information technology, qualitycontrol, research, safety, and strategic planning. Dr. Haughom became Presidentand CEO of a firm focused on health care transformation through consulting,strategic planning, mentoring inexperienced physician leaders, involvement inregional and national reform movements, membership on boards of leadingedge organizations committed to improving the value of healthcare, andpartnership with other like-minded organizations with similar aspirations andgoals. As Senior Vice President of Clinical Quality and Patient Safety for thepremiere health care system in the Northwest spanning three states (Oregon,Washington and Alaska), Dr. Haughom developed and implemented a systemwide quality improvement strategy, comprehensive patient safety plan, andcomprehensive system-wide information technology strategy.Copyright 2017 Health Catalyst

Managing care means managing the processes . of care. It does not mean managing physicians and nurses. What Brent said is very true. One of the big mistakes made in the 90’s with the “managed care” movement was naively thinking that managing care meant telling physicians and nurses what to do.

Related Documents:

The Deming management method is a set of 14 imperative state- ments, published together for the first time in Deming (1981/1982) and subsequently in Deming (1982) and Walton (1986). The development of the 14 points in the Deming management method was a gradual process

To explain W. Edwards Deming's Theory of Management To present and discuss Deming's 14 Points for Management To explain the relationship between Deming's 14 points and variation in a system To discuss the paradigm shift in management caused by Deming's theory of management 2.1 Introduction

The French Deming Association has a mission to implement the management theory designed by Deming. They offer The New Economics and Out of the Crisis in French as well as other related books. Their web site also offers several interesting papers including: Before Deming's 14 Points for Management by Jean-Marie Gogue, The French Deming .

now is known as the Deming Prize. From 1979 onwards, Deming also worked with American organisations; his thinking and teaching about leading and managing spread throughout the Western world. Deming sought to publish his work in a way that was accessible to everyone. The first manifestation of this was Deming's 14 Points or 14 Obligations for

W. Edwards Deming was one of the strongest proponents of quality management, and in his book, Out of the Crisis, Deming outlined a set of 14 points that provide a foundation for quality management. Although Deming's philosophies have been embraced around the world, only three studies have empirically tested a theoretical model

Ja anto win the coveted Deming Prize, which recognizes outstand ing achievement for quality-control management. The Deming Prize was created in 1951 to honor American quality pioneer W. Edwards Deming and the businesses that exercise his management concepts. The prize was opened to overseas compa nies in 1985. However, no foreign

IAS 36 – LỖ TỔN THẤT TÀI SẢN. xxx KHÔNG áp dụngcho Ápdụngcho x Hàng tồnkho (IAS 2) x . Tài sản tài chính (IFRS 9) x . Quyền lợi người lao động (IAS 19) x . Tài sản thuế hoãn lại (IAS 12) x . Hợp đồng xây dựng (IAS 11) x . Bất động s

order to accommodate them to the Deming regression models. In contrast, the %Deming_Linnet SAS macro presented below is straightforward for the computation of the Deming regression estimates (slope and intercept) in the comparison of a new measurement method to a reference method. The %Deming_Linnet macro requires the following five arguments: 1.