Recovery Model - Indiana

2y ago
9 Views
2 Downloads
2.12 MB
33 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Shaun Edmunds
Transcription

Recovery ModelAdapted from: SAMHSA’s Working Definition of Recovery: 10Guiding Principles of RecoveryPublisher: SAMHSAPublication ID: PEP12-RECDEF New Freedom Commission on Mental Health,Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental HealthCare in America. (Final Report)Publisher: HHSPublication ID: SMA-03-3832

PresenterMichael Ross, MSW, LCSWEmail: Michael.Ross@fssa.IN.govPhone: (317) 234-9746Recovery WorksForensic Treatment Services Program DirectorDivision of Mental Health and Addictions

Outline1.2.3.4.5.Learning ObjectivesRecovery ModelTen Fundamental Components of RecoveryFour Major Dimensions that Support a Life in RecoveryThe Way Forward

Learning Objectives1. Be able to DEFINERecovery and Resilience.2. Know the TEN FundamentalComponents of theRecovery Model.3. Know the FOUR majordimensions that support alife in recovery.4. Be able to EXPLAIN theimportance of the RecoveryModel.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2016)

Recovery Model A non-linear process of change through whichindividuals improve their health and wellness, live aself-directed life, and strive to reach their fullpotential.

Recovery-Oriented Systemsof Care Recovery-Oriented Systems of Care (ROSCs) aredesigned to help individuals recover from behavioralhealth problems across their lifespan by allowingchoice, enhancing agency, and improvingcollaboration.

RecoveryIn the final report of the New Freedom Commission onMental Health:Recovery refers to the process in which people are ableto live, work, learn, and participate fully in theircommunities. For some individuals, recovery is the abilityto live a fulfilling and productive life despite a disability.For others, recovery implies the reduction or completeremission of symptoms. Science has shown that havinghope plays an integral role in an individual’s recovery.(New Freedom Commission Report, 2003)

ResilienceIn the final report of the New Freedom Commission on MentalHealth:Resilience means the personal and community qualities thatenable us to rebound from adversity, trauma, tragedy, threats,or other stresses — and to go on with life with a sense ofmastery, competence, and hope. We now understand fromresearch that resilience is fostered by a positive childhood andincludes positive individual traits, such as optimism, goodproblem-solving skills, and treatments. Closely knitcommunities and neighborhoods are also resilient, providingsupports for their members.(New Freedom Commission Report, 2003)

Ten FundamentalComponents of Recovery1. Recovery emerges from hope2. Recovery is person-driven3. Recovery occurs via manypathways4. Recovery is holistic5. Recovery is supported bypeers and allies6. Recovery involves individual,family, and communitystrengths and responsibility7. Recovery is supportedthrough relationship andsocial networks8. Recovery is culturally-basedand influenced9. Recovery is supported byaddressing trauma10. Recovery is based on respect(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery emerges from hope The belief that recovery is real provides the essentialand motivating message of a better future—thatpeople can and do overcome the internal and externalchallenges, barriers, and obstacles that confrontthem.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery emerges from hope(continued) Hope is internalized and can be fostered by peers,families, providers, allies, and others. Hope is thecatalyst of the recovery process.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is person-driven Self-determination and self-direction are thefoundations for recovery as individuals define theirown life goals and design their unique path(s) towardsthose goals.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is person-driven(continued) Individuals optimize their autonomy and independenceto the greatest extent possible by leading, controlling,and exercising choice over the services and supportsthat assist their recovery and resilience.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery occurs via manypathways Individuals are unique with distinct needs, strengths,preferences, goals, culture, and backgrounds—includingtrauma experience—that affect and determine theirpathway(s) to recovery.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery occurs via manypathways (continued) Recovery is nonlinear, characterized by continual growthand improved functioning that may involve setbacks.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery occurs via manypathways (continued) Recovery pathways are highly personalized. They mayinclude professional clinical treatment; use ofmedications; support from families and in schools; faithbased approaches; peer support; and other approaches.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is holistic Recovery encompasses an individual’s whole life,including mind, body, spirit, and community. Thearray of services and supports available should beintegrated and coordinated.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is supported bypeers and allies Mutual support and mutual aid groups, including thesharing of experiential knowledge and skills, as well associal learning, play an invaluable role in recovery.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is supported bypeers and allies (continued) By fostering collaboration professionals can also playan important role in the recovery process by providingclinical treatment and other services that supportindividuals in their chosen recovery paths.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery involves individual,family, & community strengthsand responsibility Individuals, families, and communities have strengthsand resources that serve as a foundation for recovery.In addition, individuals have a personal responsibilityfor their own self-care and journeys of recovery.Individuals should be supported in speaking forthemselves.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is supportedthrough relationship & socialnetworks An important factor in the recovery process is thepresence and involvement of people who believe inthe person’s ability to recover; who offer hope,support, and encouragement; and who also suggeststrategies and resources for change.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is culturally-basedand influenced Culture and cultural background in all of its diverserepresentations—including values, traditions, andbeliefs—are keys in determining a person’s journeyand unique pathway to recovery.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is supported byaddressing trauma The experience of trauma (such as physical or sexualabuse, domestic violence, war, disaster, and others) isoften a precursor to or associated with alcohol anddrug use, mental health problems, and related issues.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Recovery is based on respect Community, systems, and societal acceptance andappreciation for people affected by mental health andsubstance use problems—including protecting theirrights and eliminating discrimination—are crucial inachieving recovery.(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Four major dimensions thatsupport a life in recovery1.2.3.4.(Hamrah, 2016)HealthHomePurposeCommunity(Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

The Way ForwardMedical Model Professional in charge Focus on illness anddysfunction Focus on disability andlack of competence Directive Tends to be reductionistic LinearRecovery Model Client centered Focus on wellness andfunction Focus on ability andcompetence Collaborative Tends to be holistic Non-linear

The Way ForwardIt is critical that treatment professionals and communitiesdevelop coalitions to reduce stigma and promote the roleof resilience, resistance, and recovery in prevention,health promotion, and treatment.

The Way ForwardRecovery-oriented systems support person-centered andself-directed approaches to care that build on thestrengths and resilience of individuals, families, andcommunities to take responsibility for their sustainedhealth, wellness and recovery.

The Way Forward What does an unsuccessful program look like? What does a successful program look like?

QuestionsEmail Recovery.Works@fssa.IN.gov

he World Health Report: 2001. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope.Nullis, Clare (Associated Press Writer) 2001, WHO Urges Greater Recognition of Mental HealthProblems. Canoe Health Geneva (AP), 04 October 2001.Garmezy, N. (1991). Resilience in children’s adaptation to negative life events and stressed environments. Pediatrics Annals, 20,459–460, 463–466.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity—A Supplement to MentalHealth: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse andMental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services.Dumont, J. and P. Ridgway. Mental health recovery: What helps and what hinders. in Southern Regional Conference on MentalHealth Statistics. 2002. New Orleans, LA.Anthony, W.A., Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. PsychosocialRehabilitation Journal, 1993. 16: p. 11-23.Carpinello, S.E., et al., The development of the Mental Health Confidence Scale: A measure of selfefficacy in individuals diagnosedwith mental disorders. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 2000. 23: p. 236-243.Corrigan, P.W., et al., Recovery as a psychological construct. Community Mental Health Journal, 1999. 35(3): p. 231-240.DeMasi, M.E., et al. Specifying dimensions of recovery. in Proceedings: 6th Annual National Conference on State Mental HealthAgency Services Research and Program Evaluation. 1996. Alexandria, VA:National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors (NASMHPD) Research Institute.Ralph, R.O. and D. Lambert, Needs Assessment Survey of a Sample of AMHI Consent Decree Class Members. 1996, Portland, ME:Edmund S. Muskie Institute of Public Affairs, University of Southern Maine.Carling, P.J., Return to community: Building support systems for people with psychiatric disabilities. 1995, New York: GuilfordPublications.Wong, Y.I. and P.L. Solomon, Community integration of persons with psychiatric disabilities in supportive independent housing: Aconceptual model and methodological considerations. Mental Health Services Research, 2002. 4: p. 13-28.Braitman, A., et al., Comparison of barriers to employment for unemployed and employed clients in a case management program:An exploratory study. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 1995. 19(1): p. 3-18.Mann, S.B., Talking through medication issues: One family's experience. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1999. 25: p. 407-409.

9.30.31.Sheehan, S., Is there no place on earth for me? 1982, New York: Vintage Books.Crane-Ross, D., D. Roth, and B.G. Lauber, Consumers' and case managers' perceptions of mental health and community supportservice needs. Community Mental Health Journal, 2000. 36: p. 161-178.Hogan, M.F., Spending Too Much on Mental Illness in All the Wrong Places. Psychiatric Services, 2002. 53(10): p. 1251-1252.Drake, R.E., et al., Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 2001.52: p. 179-182.Bond, G.R., et al., Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2000. 2: p. 75-87.Becker, D.R., et al., Fidelity of supported employment programs and employment outcomes. Psychiatric Services, 2001. 52: p. 834836.McHugo, G.J., et al., Fidelity to assertive community treatment and client outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study.Psychiatric Services, 1999. 50(6): p. 818-824.McGrew, J.H., et al., Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting andClinical Psychology, 1994. 62: p. 670-678.Jerrell, J.M. and M.S. Ridgely, Impact of robustness of program implementation on outcomes of clients in dual diagnosis programs.Psychiatric Services, 1999. 50: p. 109-112.McDonnell, J., et al., An analysis of the procedural components of supported employment programs associated with employmentoutcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. Special Issue: Supported employment, 1989. 22(4): p. 417-428.Lehman, A.F. and D.M. Steinwachs, Patterns of usual care for schizophrenia: Initial results from the Schizophrenia PatientOutcomes Research Team (PORT) client survey. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1998. 24: p. 11-20.Drake, R.E., et al., Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services, 2001.52: p. 179-182.Lehman, A.F. and D.M. Steinwachs, Patterns of usual care for schizophrenia: Initial results from the Schizophrenia PatientOutcomes Research Team (PORT) client survey. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1998. 24: p. 11-20.Lehman, A.F. and D.M. Steinwachs, Translating research into practice: The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT)treatment recommendations. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 1998. 24: p. 1-10.Copeland, M.E., Wellness Recovery Action Plan. 1997, Brattleboro, VT: Peach Press. Chichester. p. 91-109.Mueser, K.T., et al., Illness management and recovery for severe mental illness: A review of the research. Psychiatric Services,2002. 53(10): p. 1272-1284.

family, and community strengths and responsibility Ten Fundamental Components of Recovery 7. Recovery is supported through relationship and social networks 8. Recovery is culturally-based and influenced 9. Recovery is supported by addressing trauma 10. Recovery is based on respect (Substance Abuse Mental Health Service Administration, 2013)

Related Documents:

Indiana State University 2 5.0% University of Southern Indiana 0 0.0% Indiana University-Bloomington 6 15.0% Indiana University-East 0 0.0% Indiana University-Kokomo 1 2.5% Indiana University-Northwest 0 0.0% Indiana University-Purdue University-Indianapolis 4 10.0% Indiana University-South Bend 0 0.0% Indiana University-Southeast 1 2.5%

THE RECOVERY VOICE Contact Us! Jackson Area Recovery Community (517)-788-5596 www.homeofnewvision.org Thank you for your support! Jackson Area Recovery Community is a program of Spring 2020 The Recovery Voice Spring 2020 The Recovery Voice 1 Cross Cultural Recovery By Riley Kidd H

1. Recovery emerges from hope; 2. Recovery is person-driven; 3. Recovery occurs via many pathways; 4. Recovery is holistic; 5. Recovery is supported by peers and allies; 6. Recovery is supported through relationship and social networks; 7. Recovery is culturally-based and influence; 8. Recovery is supported by addressing trauma; 9.

4.2 State Disaster Recovery policy 4.3 County and Municipal Recovery Relationships 4.4 Recovery Plan Description 4.5 Recovery Management Structure and Recovery Operations 4.6 Draft National Disaster recovery Framework (February 5, 2010) 4.6.1 Draft Purpose Statement of the National Disaster Recovery Framework

Geoffrey Fox, Sung-Hoon Ko Community Grids Laboratory, Indiana University gcf@indiana.edu, suko@indiana.edu 224 Showers Bldg. 501 N. Morton St. Bloomington, IN 47404 (812) 856 7977 Fax. (812) 856 7972 Kangseok Kim, Sangyoon Oh Computer Science Department, Indiana University kakim@indiana.edu, ohsangy@indiana.edu 222 Showers Bldg.

Site Recovery Manager and EMC RecoverPoint Leverage VMware Infrastructure to Make Disaster Recovery: Rapid – Automate disaster recovery process – Eliminate complexities of traditional recovery Reliable – Ensure proper execution of recovery plan – Enable easier, more frequent tests Manageable – Centrally manage recovery plans

vRealize Suite Disaster Recovery by Using Site Recovery Manager 5 1 Disaster Recovery Introduction 6 Overview of VMware Site Recovery Manager 7 Local and Remote Sites 8 Heterogeneous Configurations on the Protected and Recovery Sites 9 Site Recovery Manager Workflow 10 Restoring the Pre-Recovery Site Configuration By Performing Failback 11 2

Aliens' Behaviour Connectives Game This game was originally developed in 2006 for Year 5/6 at Dunkirk Primary School in Nottingham. It has also been used at KS3. We have chosen this topic because we hope it will encourage children to produce their own alien names (a useful use of phonically regular nonsense words!), portraits and sentences .