Expert IQ Report: Melania Vs. Michelle Divided Speeches .
Expert IQ Report: Melania vs. Michelle – Divided SpeechesCOMPARING MELANIA TRUMP AND MICHELLE OBAMA SPEECHES ANALYSISExpert System’s Independent Text Analysis of Melania Trump and Michelle Obama’s SpeechesConfirms Strong Linguistic DifferencesThe following independent report was developed by Expert System using Cogito cognitive technology toanalyze similarities and differences between Melania Trump and Michelle Obama’s speeches.The data used for this document was taken from transcripts of Melania Trump -michelle-obama-similar-convention-speeches July 18 2016)and 2006 Michelle Obama speech(Source: e.obama.transcript/).Expert System’s analysis offers only a quantitative analysis of the extracted data; focusing on transcript text,processing both speeches with using Cogito technology, and asking a simple question:“From a linguistic standpoint, did Melania and Michelle say basically the same things?”When we consider the complete speech, beyond the controversial passage, the answer is, “No”.
Main topics and emotionsWe first start from a general analysis of the topic covered, the emotions expressed in the speeches and anoverview of the most relevant entities (people, places etc.)Melania TrumpMichelle ObamaBy looking at the graphs it is obvious that the women covered similar topics however with different emphasis,with Michelle Obama seeming to focus more on the executive branch of government, while Melania Trumpcovered more in general the topic of politics.There is a striking difference instead in the emotions between the two speeches with “Hope”, the core team ofthe campaign, the most relevant emotion in Michelle Obama speech, followed by love and success. “Desire”instead is the first emotion in Melania Trump’s speech who also covers love and success in the same order.
Michelle Obama’s speech was very focused and presents a single, strong (and highly relevant) correlationbetween Barack Obama, the Senate and the USA; while in Melania Trump’s speech there are differentcorrelations.Main concepts and sentencesLooking at the main sentences, both Melania and Michelle talk about the key-role of the President for thefuture of the US. But it looks like Melania assigns a much more direct role to her husband as a single leader(Donald wants our country to move forward in the most positive ways) while Michelle uses a terminology thatsignal more the role of her husband as service to the American people (Millions of Americans Barack).Melania Trump main concepts and most relevant sentencesMichelle Obama main concepts and most relevant sentencesIf we look at the main concepts covered in the two speechs, we can also see some differences. For example,Melania gives great importance to the figure of Bob Dole, a veteran with a very important role in the recenthistory of the Republican Party, while none of the competitors in the primary race has had a relevant role. Onthe contrary, in terms of semantic relevancy, Michelle gives high visibility to Hillary Clinton, a fierce competitorin the 2008 Democratic Party primary race. It is also very important to highlight that there is a tribute toChicago while in Melania's speech New York is just briefly mentioned at the beginning of the speech but withno semantic relevancy whatsoever.
Melania Trump speech main elements of the most relevant sentencesMichelle Obama speech main elements of the most relevant sentencesA more detailed analysis of the words used show that Melania gave more importance to her husband in herspeech than by Michelle by mentioning Donald Trump or husband 35% more often than Michelle. Whenconsidering that Michelle’s speech was significantly longer this translates into an 80% more relevance insidethe speech.Both women mentioned country, USA, and American frequently but also in this case the theme seems morerelevant in Melania’s speech than in Michelle’s with more than 60% higher frequency translating thereforeeven in a higher relevancy.
LexiconsIf we make a closer examination of their lexicons, we notice interesting differences.Melania Trump uses easier passages in English to understand (readability English about 39.3% vs Michellereadability index about 23.35%) and a richer vocabulary (78.6% of richness vs 48.47% vocabulary richness ofMichelle). Michelle Obama used more articulated sentences and in general her speech seemed to target anaudience with a higher level of education and this is also reflected in longer sentences. (average words persentence 28.08 vs Melania average words per sentence 16.33).The writeprint map on the right shows some similarities in terms of use of short words and adverbs. However,it is very evident a higher use of adjectives from Melania. In this specific field Michelle is significantly belowaverage signaling maybe an attempt to focus more directly on the content.NOTE: The left-hand column shows a few graphs to concretely assess the document's reading difficulty, the writer'svocabulary level, the minimum schooling grade needed to read the document flawlessly, the spotted slangs and registers,and a table showing accurate and focused text analysis. The right-hand column shows a graph which associates a set ofhighly validating readability indexes and marks the author's style and efficacy. The two graphs below the former display anarrow grammatical inquiry centered on the verbs' genre and their tense analysis.Melania Trump
Michelle Obama
Main verbsThe detailed analysis of verbs shows in general, and as expected, a similar pattern. However, it is worth tomention that to “hope” is of course at the center of Michelle’s speech and it is not even mentioned once byMelania, who instead uses very frequently to fight. Below a graph showing the most used verbs (be and haveexcluded).Melania TrumpMichelle ObamaAbout Expert SystemExpert System is a leading provider of cognitive computing and text analytics software based on the proprietary, patented, multilingualsemantic technology of Cogito. Using Expert System’s products, enterprise companies and government agencies can go beyond traditionalkeyword approaches for the rapid sense-making of their structured and unstructured data. Expert System technology serves some of theworld’s largest industries including Banking and Insurance, Life Sciences and Pharmaceuticals, Oil and Gas, Media and Publishing, andGovernment.www.expertsystem.com – info@expertsystem.com
Melania Trump Michelle Obama By looking at the graphs it is obvious that the women covered similar topics however with different emphasis, with Michelle Obama seeming to focus mo
degli accordi. Il testo che vi presentiamo on-line contiene quasi tutti i canti del libretto della parrocchia di S.Melania che trovate in un altro link di questa stessa sezione. In questa versione sono indicati, oltre ai testi, anche gli accordi per chitarra – a volte in due diverse tonalità – con i quali vengono
An In-Depth Look At DIrect exAmInAtIon of expert WItnesses 153 II. expert WItnesses GenerALLy A. Need for Expert Testimony When preparing a case for trial, counsel must assess whether an expert’s testimony will be necessary.6 Generally, the purpose of expert witnesses is to clear up fuzzy facts or to strengthen inferences that might otherwise be confusing for the jury.7 The decision usually
3.7 Perceived requirement for expert systems 52 3.8 The role of an expert system 52 3.9 Responsibility of expert systems 55 3.10 Motivation for developing an expert system 56 3.11 Validation 59 3.12 Summary 60 4. EXPERT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT 4.1 Introduction: A very brief background 61 4.2 Categories of information systems and problems 61 4.3 .
the expert's expertise is "good" and the expert himself (or herself) is ' good"then the Expert System will perform admirably. However, models can never be 100% accurate and no expert is omniscient. Because of this, it is important that users of Expert Systems exercise caution in interpreting the answers produced by these systems.
Expert Work Parameters & “Taking Sides” We received a question about ―taking sides‖ and the scope of expert work from an expert witness and asked our expert community to share their experiences, advice, and comments – and boy did they! The original question is below, followed by the responses. Best wishes, Meredith
before acting as an expert witness. 7. This guideline does not apply to witnesses of facts. Who is an expert witness? 8. A RMP is qualified to testify as an expert witness if he has special knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education sufficient to qualify him as an expert on the subject to which his testimony relates.
With over 8 years’ experience acting as an expert witness, one of the most valuable pieces of advice I would pass on to new and even to experienced experts is that being an expert in your field is only the start of being an expert witness. The role and duties of an expert witness go well beyond just advising on an expertise. I would
6 MATHEMATICS - Week 1 Lesson 2: Irrational Numbers Learning Objective: Students will be able to give an approximate value of an irrational numbers using rational numbers on a number line. Math Standards: 8.NS.A.2: Use rational approximations of irrational numbers to compare the size of irrational numbers. Locate them approximately on a number line diagram and estimate their values.
