Qualification Of ITEX-07 Explosive For Fuze Applications

3y ago
71 Views
10 Downloads
888.94 KB
18 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Bennett Almond
Transcription

Qualification Of ITEX-07Explosive For Fuze ApplicationsDr. Rainer SchirraDynITEC GmbH(Tel: 49 (0) 2241 208 4929 – email: rainer.schirra@dynitec.com)Jason Fitzgerald-SmithDr. Helmut ZöllnerAlberto CarrilloDynITEC GmbHDynITEC GmbHBAE Systems1

PBXN-7 / ITEX-07 PBXN-7 Composition RDXTATBCopolymer (VITON A)35 %60 %5% Specification MIL-DTL-82874B Qualified by the US-Navy „PBXN-7“ manufactured with OSI-TATB, evaluated by the USNavy, has enhanced shock insensitivenessTo describe its improved IM property, this variant of PBXN-7 forfuture military use has been designated ITEX-07 2

Qualification – Time Schedule DynITEC Physical tests and thermal characteristics(related to detonating devices) Finished Jan 08 Additional tube tests in summer 08 WIWEB Tests according to STANAG 4170 / TL 1376-0800 / AOP-7 Sep 08 – Jan 09 Contracted by DynITEC QinetiQ EMTAP-Tests (No 35, No 41, No 42) Expected in May 09Schutzvermerk nach ISO 16016 beachten3

Friction / 50,070,070,090,090,0110,0110,0130,0130,0Friction [N]Friction [N]150,0150,0170,0170,0190,0190,0NTONTOTest set-ups and procedures according to BAMDetermination of no-go-level:Highest level with no reaction or no detonationin 6 tests.AOP-7 min. requirements for boosterexplosives 80 N for friction and 3 J for 15,0Impact [J]Impact [J]20,020,025,025,04

Ignition BXN-5HNS-HBDHNS-HBDNTONTOTemperatureTemperature[ C][ C]270270290290240240280280 310 310280280Wood‘s Metal Bath Test in accordance with DynITEC-procedure 3010AOP-7 min. requirements for booster explosives 180 C at 5 280,0300,0300,0320,0320,0Temperature [ C]Temperature [ C]5

Minimum Priming Charge Test No-GoNo-Go[mg][mg]GoGo[mg][mg] ITEX-07ITEX-07PB-HMXPB-HMX505090906060100100 RDXRDXPBXN-5PBXN-5303025254040303055 110 losiveExplosiveExplosiveExplosiveSpecial DynITEC-method to evaluate explosives for use indetonating devicesDetermination of the minimum amount of primary explosive to geta reliable initiation of the (secondary) explosive underinvestigationPrimary explosive (lead azide 94oD) is changed in 100,0Lead azide [mg]Lead azide [mg]6

Booster-Gap-TestExplosiveExplosiveTest based on STANAG 4363 and AOP-21Designed for explosive components (boosters and leads)Acceptance criteria for boosters 28mm water TONTO 19201620162021252125 5 er Gap [mm]Water Gap [mm]Booster DM 1291; Loading pressure: 0,7 kbar7

Tube Test – Electrically Heated Slow Heating (EMTAP No 42)Test results Heating rate 1 K/minReaction time 2:49 [h:m]Reaction temperatureca. 195 CSix fragmentsReaction type: Cat 2Deflagration8

Tube Test – Fast Heating (EMTAP No 41)Test results Reaction after 339 s Two fragmentsReaction type: Cat 2 Comparable to Rowanex 3601Schutzvermerk nach ISO 16016 beachten9

Tube Test – Internal Ignition (EMTAP No 35)Test resultsTest results No fragmentsReaction after 339 sReaction type: Cat 1Two fragmentsComparable to Rowanex 3601Reaction type: Cat 2 Comparable to Rowanex 3601Schutzvermerk nach ISO 16016 beachten10

WIWEB Test ResultsCharacteristicDoc.Test(STANAG)Criteria for booster explosives(AOP-7)WIWEBDynITECGas liberation 1.0 ml/g at 100 C for 40 h./.24 h:100 C: 0.04 ml/2.5g150 C: 2.5 ml/2.5gDSC orDecomposition exotherm peak: 180 C at a heating rate of 5 C/min 180 C233.8 Cok231 C 32 J7,5 J80 N 7690 m/sok(4 weeks / 80 C)ok(270 C)./.20 J96 N./.STANAG 4170Vacuum Stability4556Thermal Characterisation4515Ignition TemperatureElectrostatic SensitivityImpact SensitivityFriction SensitivityDetonation VelocityVariation of propertieswith ageExplosive responsewhen ignited4491449044894487AOP-7TGAWood's Metal BathSmall-scale spark testBAM-TestBAM-Test 180 C at a heating rate of 5 C/minNational3 J: No reaction (10 out of 10 trials)80 N: No reaction (10 out of 10 trials)AOP-74491./.see EMTAP-testsTL 1376-0800Criteria for insensitive explosivesFast Cook Off(90 K/min)HeatingCaliber 12.7 mmvo 900 m/sDistance 6 mGap testDiameter: 21 mmImpactShockReaction type 5 (burn)Type 5Reaction type 5 (burn)Type 6No detonation 15 mmto be determinedEMTAP (Tube Tests)Internal IgnitionFast HeatingElectrically HeatedNo 35No 41No 42Reaction category 2Reaction category 2Reaction category 21 Test performed: Cat 11 Test performed: Cat 21 Test performed: Cat 211

Summary ITEX-07 is qualified according to STANAG 4170. Preliminary EMTAP-tests show excellent IM-properties less than or equal todeflagration Cat 2 reaction. Thermal behaviour is dominated by RDX: separate investigation & report. Material used for the insensitive booster of the new UK multi-purpose artilleryfuze L166A1 (production starts in summer 2009). ITEX-07 is currently being allocated an EX-number by the US DoD.12

Thermal Stability (heating ramp)Heating rate:3 K/hSample volume: 8 cm3 cube13

Thermal Stability (isoperibolic)Tisoperibolic:195 CSample volume: 1,7 cm3 cube14

Volume-dependent self-ignition temperatures for ITEX-07VolumeSITexpT Ukrit.,theoret.0,2 cm3L 0,003 m203 C203 C1,0 cm3L 0,005 m197 C197 C1,7 cm3L 0,006 m194 C195 C8 cm3L 0,01 m190 C190 CSITexp:Self-ignition temperature determined by experimentT Ukrit.,theoret.: Self-ignition temperature according to the thermal explosion theory15

Volume-dependent self-ignition temperatures (acc. to thermalexplosion theory)16

Booster-Gap-Test: Experimental SetupWitness rodFiring setupHolderHolderFiring setupCenter discBoosterWater gapPMMA-tubeDonor chargeDetonator No.8Donor charge (RDX)Firing setupSchutzvermerk nach ISO 16016 beachten17

Minimum Priming Charge Test Special DynITEC method toevaluate explosives for use indetonating devicesDetermination of the minimumamount of primary explosiveto get a reliable initiation of the(secondary) explosive underinvestigationPrimary explosive (lead azide94oD) is changed in 5mgintervallsDrop ballFiring pinPlastic holderMetal tubeStab sensitive chargeLead azideSecondary explosiveWitness plateBaseSchutzvermerk nach ISO 16016 beachten18

Tube Test – Fast Heating (EMTAP No 41) Test results Reaction after 339 s Two fragments Reaction type: Cat 2 Comparable to Rowanex 3601. Schutzvermerk nach ISO 16016 beachten. 10 Tube Test – Internal Ignition (EMTAP No 35) Test results Reaction after 339 s

Related Documents:

2 Arkansas Weapons Laws o (6) "Distribute" means to sell, issue, give, transfer, or otherwise dispose of explosive material; o (7) "Explosive material" means an explosive, blasting agent, or detonator; o (8) (A) "Explosive" means any chemical compound mixture or device, the primary or common purpose of which is to function by explosion. (B) "Explosive" includes, without limitation:

5000 m. Explosive welding underwater can significantly reduce noise pollution. Some researchers have welded plates underwater using the explosive welding technique [12-17]. Nonetheless there are very few references about underwater explosive welding of cylindrical members. Figure 1. Schematic diagram of explosive welding process in planar geometry

Cure CL-20 Explosive DLE-C038 IM and Qualification Testing of Cast Cure CL-20 Explosive DLE-C038. Prepared For. 2007 IM/EM Technical Symposium. October 15-18, 2007. Miami, FL. Robert Hatch and Paul Braithwaite – ATK Launch Systems

5.D Qualification of water supplies 5.D.1 Introduction 5.D.2 Risk analysis 5.D.3 Design qualification 5.D.4 Installation qualification 5.D.5 Operational qualification (OQ) 5.D.6 Transfer to the user 5.D.7 Process validation/performance qualification (PQ) 5.D.8 Qualification report 5.E Operation of water supplies

An equipment qualification is handled in different phases of the equipment lifecycle, start-ing with design qualification, installation qualification, and then operational qualification and performance qualification. Every step in the equipment qualification formally comprises a plan, the execution and a report.

exempting qualification. B Structure of the qualification The structure of the qualification and syllabus subjects is shown on the following diagram. C Progression through the qualification Subjects within each learning pillar of the qualification are designed to be sequential, from operational to strategic level, encouraging

Protecting Civilians from the Effects of Explosive Weapons An Analysis of International Legal and Policy Standards Maya Brehm UNITED NATIONS INSTITUTE FOR DISARMAMENT . Use of explosive weapons in a law enforcement context . 100 3.3.1. Policing assemblies . 104 3.3.2. Use of explosive weapons in populated .

API Recommended Practice 2A-WSD Planning, Designing, and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design TWENTY-SECOND EDITION NOVEMBER 2014 310 PAGES 395.00 PRODUCT NO. G2AWSD22 This recommended practice is based on global industry best practices and serves as a guide for those who are concerned with the design and construction of new fixed offshore platforms and for the .