Gender Dimensions Of Solid And Liquid Waste Management For Reuse In .

1y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
978.26 KB
37 Pages
Last View : 6d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Casen Newsome
Transcription

RESOURCE RECOVERY & REUSE SERIES 2121ISSN 2478-0529Gender Dimensions of Solid and Liquid WasteManagement for Reuse in Agriculture in Asiaand AfricaAvinandan Taron, Pay Drechsel and Solomie Gebrezgabher

About the Resource Recovery & Reuse SeriesResource Recovery and Reuse (RRR) is a subprogram of the CGIAR ResearchProgram on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) dedicated to applied research onthe safe recovery of water, nutrients and energy from domestic and agro-industrialwaste streams. This subprogram aims to create impact through different lines ofaction research, including (i) developing and testing scalable RRR business models,(ii) assessing and mitigating risks from RRR for public health and the environment,(iii) supporting public and private entities with innovative approaches for the safereuse of wastewater and organic waste, and (iv) improving rural-urban linkages andresource allocations while minimizing the negative urban footprint on the peri-urbanenvironment. This subprogram works closely with the World Health Organization(WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), UnitedNations Environment Programme (UNEP), United Nations University (UNU) and manynational and international partners across the globe. The RRR series of documentspresents summaries and reviews of the subprogram’s research and resultingapplication guidelines, targeting development experts and others in the research fordevelopment continuum.

RESOURCE RECOVERY & REUSE SERIES 21Gender Dimensions of Solid and Liquid WasteManagement for Reuse in Agriculture in Asiaand AfricaAvinandan Taron, Pay Drechsel and Solomie Gebrezgabher

The authorsAvinandan Taron is a researcher at the InternationalWater Management Institute (IWMI), Colombo, Sri Lanka.He has an academic background in economics with aparticular interest in environmental resource economicsand agricultural economics. His work involves analysis ofinstitutions and investments towards resource recoveryand reuse focused on agriculture and rural–urban linkages.Taron, A.; Drechsel, P.; Gebrezgabher, S. 2021. Genderdimensions of solid and liquid waste management forreuse in agriculture in Asia and Africa. Colombo, Sri Lanka:International Water Management Institute (IWMI). CGIARResearch Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems(WLE). 33p. (Resource Recovery and Reuse Series 21).doi: https://doi.org/10.5337/2021.223Pay Drechsel is a Senior Fellow at IWMI co-leadingthe CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land andEcosystems (WLE) research theme on sustainingrural–urban linkages. Pay works on the safe recovery ofresources from domestic waste streams for agricultureand related business models./ resource recovery / resource management / water reuse /gender equity / social equality / waste management / solidwastes / liquid wastes / agricultural value chains / circulareconomy / business models / women's participation /urban wastes / household wastes / faecal sludge / wastecollection / recycling / wastewater treatment / organicwastes / composting / wastewater irrigation / SustainableDevelopment Goals / health hazards / sanitation / communityinvolvement / social marketing / entrepreneurs / farmers / Asia/ Africa / India / Indonesia / Philippines / Vietnam / Nepal /Ghana /Solomie Gebrezgabher is an international researcher atIWMI’s West Africa office in Accra, Ghana. She has anacademic background in business economics focusingon issues related to economic and environmentalsustainability assessment and business modeldevelopment in the waste reuse sector in developingcountries.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Dalia Saad and the lateMunir Hanjra who contributed to initial versions of thisreport.DonorsThis research was carriedout as part of the CGIARResearch Program on Water,Land and Ecosystems (WLE)and supported by Funderscontributing to the CGIARTrust Fund (https://www.cgiar.org/funders/).ISSN 2478-0510 (Print)ISSN 2478-0529 (Online)ISBN 978-92-9090-927-9Copyright 2021, CGIAR Research Program on Water,Land and Ecosystems, International Water ManagementInstitute (IWMI).Fair use: Unless otherwise noted, you are free to copy,duplicate or reproduce, and distribute, display, or transmitany part of this paper or portions thereof without permission,and to make translations, adaptations or other derivativeworks under the following conditions:ATTRIBUTION. The work must be referenced accordingto international citation standards, while attributionshould in no way suggest endorsement by WLE, IWMIor the author(s).NONCOMMERCIAL. This work may not be used forcommercial purposes.SHARE ALIKE. If this work is altered, transformed orbuilt upon, the resulting work must be distributed onlyunder the same or similar license to this one.Front cover photograph: Kaduwela Municipal Council,Resource Recovery Center. Glass sorting by Asha Nilumi.Photo: Sharmani GunawardenaEditor: Robin LeslieDesigner: W.D.A.S. Manike, ASM Graphicsii

CONTENTSList of TablesivList of FiguresivList of BoxesivAcronyms and AbbreviationsvSummaryvii1 Introduction12 Framework of the Study23 Gender Aspects in Waste Management and Resource Recovery3.1 Municipal Solid Waste Management and Resource Recovery3.1.1 Household-based Waste Management3.1.2 Waste Collection and Recycling Businesses in the Formal Sector3.1.3 Waste Collection and Recycling Activities in the Informal Sector3.2 Gender in Wastewater Management and Reuse3.2.1 Wastewater Treatment3.2.2 Acceptance of Wastewater Reuse3.2.3 Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture3.2.4 Gender Roles Along the Wastewater-irrigated Vegetable Value Chain3.2.5 Gender Dimensions of Health Risk Perceptions3.2.6 Gender Dimensions of Health Risk Mitigation Measures33557101011121315154 Conclusions18References20Annex: Definitions25iii

LIST OF TABLESTABLE 1. Gender ratio in open-space farming in various cities of West Africa14LIST OF FIGURESFIGURE 1. Relevance of SDG targets and indicators for the gender–waste nexusFIGURE 2. Gender map of waste management in Kathmandu, NepalFIGURE 3. Gender participation in formal waste collection and related variations in perceivedemployability and salary in India, Vietnam, Indonesia and the PhilippinesFIGURE 4. Gender participation in informal waste collection and recycling shop ownerships asobserved in India, Vietnam, Indonesia and the PhilippinesFIGURE 5. Attitudes towards wastewater-use options from a survey in southeast United StatesFIGURE 6. Effects of gender on the acceptance of reclaimed water use in Tehran, Iran24791112LIST OF BOXESBOX 1. Investment climate for composting enterprises – insights from women entrepreneurs in KenyaBOX 2. Formalizing the informal waste sector through associations in IndiaBOX 3. Global Gender Gap Report 2018BOX 4. Breaking gender barriers in fecal sludge emptyingBOX 5. Efforts to enhance women’s employability in wastewater treatment plants and sewerage projectsBOX 6. Greywater use at household and community levelsBOX 7. Misguided gender support in aquacultureBOX 8. Occupational exposure risks of farmers from a gender perspectiveBOX 9. Social marketing example from West Africa targeting womeniv488101113151617

ACRONYMS AND RRSDGSEWASHGSWaCHUD(D)TUNWASHWHOWLEAlliance of Indian WastepickersFecal Sludge ManagementGlobal Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-WaterGlobal Resource Information DatabaseKagad Kach Patra Kashtakari Panchayat (waste pickers’ union in India)Micro-composting CenterMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementNongovernmental OrganizationPune Municipal CorporationPublic-private PartnershipResource Recovery and ReuseSustainable Development GoalSelf Employed Women's AssociationSelf-help GroupSolid Waste Collection and Handling (cooperative of waste pickers in Pune)Urine-diverting (Dry) ToiletUnited NationsWater, Sanitation and HygieneWorld Health OrganizationCGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystemsv

SUMMARYResource Recovery and Reuse (RRR) is at the core of thecircular economy and particularly important in an urbanizingworld where cities as consumption hubs become vast sinksof usually wasted resources. To recover the value whichwastewater and organic (food) waste, in particular, canoffer agriculture, there are many entry and scaling barriersfor entrepreneurs to realize the required potential of thecircular economy, and these are even higher for women.Different challenges apply to efforts increasing safe reusewhere resource recovery is already happening at scale, forexample in the informal wastewater irrigation sector.Through a gender lens, this report examines socialequality aspects in RRR via implementation of thecircular economy in low-income countries. The focus ison solid waste management and composting as well aswastewater management for reuse in agriculture. Thereport complements a previous one in the same serieson energy recovery from waste and is based on researchsupported by the CGIAR Research Program on Water,Land and Ecosystems (WLE) and a literature review.The report shows that women are represented in greatestnumbers at the base of the recycling chain, most oftenas informal waste pickers and as sorters of recyclableswith limited upward mobility. They have less accessto equipment, vehicles and waste than men; thus,women are less able to access, collect and transportlarger volumes and higher value recyclables. Analyzingthe gender dimension is important for understandinghousehold responses to RRR programs, differencesbetween the formal and informal sectors as well as alongthe waste-to-resource value chain from collection totreatment and reuse. The report maintains focus on thecurrent situation and does not discuss the wider benefitsand gender-related impacts of improved Water, Sanitationand Hygiene (WASH) or waste management which havebeen described elsewhere in sufficient detail.The report shows that despite the wide gender gap inthe waste sector, projects targeting municipal wastereduction or recycling, including the recovery of soilnutrients and organic matter via composting, cannotbypass women who are usually the focal point for wastemanagement in households, including waste segregation,and in many regions constitute the most powerful wastecollection and recycling workforce where the informalsector complements the formal one.The report also shows that despite the wide gender gap inthe sanitation sector, projects aiming at food safety wherewastewater is used for irrigation must work with womenalong the food chain who in many regions have the safetyof irrigated vegetables ‘in their hands’.Key findings are: In solid waste management and recycling as wellas wastewater irrigation, gender equality and equityare missing and often undermined by strong genderstereotypes given the nature of the work. However, regionally, women can play an importantand gender-specific role in informal waste collectionand recycling activities as well as the sale ofwastewater-irrigated crops which makes them themain target group for reforms and safety innovations. As the success of composting at municipal scaledepends on household waste segregation, agender-sensitive approach is needed for educationalprograms to identify the right target group(s) withinhouseholds, who are often women, but can also bechildren or household staff. Safe greywater reuse and composting at householdor community levels offer women in water-stressedregions opportunities for food production and incomewhile saving time and resources. Most RRR business models do not show (technical)gender equality barriers preventing a higher share ofwomen than commonly observed in the waste andsanitation sectors (10% to 20%). However, thereis no gender neutrality and common barriers, likeaccess to finance, as well as cultural stereotypesmake it difficult for women to find work in the formalwaste and sanitation sectors. The formalization of usually women-dominatedwaste pickers into associations or cooperatives cansignificantly improve the status of women and urbanwaste management services including decentralizedenergy recovery and compost production fromorganic waste. A key requirement for any sustainable RRR fromwaste products is ‘safety’. Gender-sensitive riskreduction measures are needed in line with the WorldHealth Organization's (WHO) multibarrier approachwhere clear gender differences can be found alongthe food value chain, such as irrigated vegetables,to make this 30-million hectare (ha) farming systema safe pillar of the global circular economy.Given the cultural diversity across the reported casesand general absence of gender-disaggregated data inwaste management, and RRR in particular, further genderstudies are highly recommended.vii

GENDER DIMENSIONS OF SOLID AND LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR REUSE IN AGRICULTURE IN ASIA AND AFRICA1. INTRODUCTIONWith rapid population growth and increase in per capitaconsumption, generation of waste is expected to increaseat a higher rate than population growth. The estimatesforecast that waste generation will increase by 70% andreach 3.4 billion tonnes by 2050 (World Bank 2019a).This will challenge many administrations where currentlywaste management consumes a major part of thebudget1. Given the increasing scarcity of freshwaterand phosphorus, a paradigm shift towards a circulareconomy is required. This is particularly important inview of urbanization where hungry cities become regionalconsumption hubs importing vast amounts of soil nutrientsthrough food, while farmers in the food production areasstruggle with depleted soils (Drechsel and Hanjra 2016).Cities are also extremely thirsty, extracting every availablefreshwater source from their vicinities contributing tonegative urban footprints (Kookana et al. 2020). Strategiesin support of a more circular economy target the potentialof waste as an undervalued resource which allows therecovery of raw materials and water for reintroductioninto the agricultural production–consumption cycle. Inparticular, this concerns the largest waste category, i.e.organic waste, such as food waste and fecal sludge,which is rich in crop nutrients, energy and organiccompounds but a major environmental and health hazardif poorly managed (Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2019).The circular economy concept offers multiple benefits,which have been recognized in ecological economics,green growth and sustainable development paradigms,e.g. the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The coreof the circular economy, i.e. Resource Recovery and Reuse(RRR), can be instrumental in achieving several SDG targetssuch as food security and sustainable agriculture (SDG 2),recycling and safe water reuse, and water for ecosystems(SDG 6), increasing the share of renewable energy (SDG7), reducing waste generation through reduction, recycling1and reuse (SDG 12), and restoration of degraded soils (SDG15) that acknowledge the concept of the circular economydirectly or indirectly.In this context, the RRR sector is still nascent which isalso reflected in the scarcity of gender-related data andpublications. Many RRR initiatives continue to depend onsubsidies/funding from donors and often have difficulty insurviving their pilot phases. However, hopeful signs of viableapproaches to RRR as a business are emerging around theglobe including low- and middle-income countries. Theseenterprises or initiatives are building on an entrepreneurialmindset, where public–private partnerships (PPP), forexample, help to realize commercial or social value. In manycases, RRR will allow some degrees of cost recovery, whichwithin the waste and sanitation sectors are still an exception,while other RRR models manage operational and evencapital cost recovery (Otoo and Drechsel 2018).Along with the realization and recognition of theimportance of RRR, it is imperative to understand genderroles, constraints and opportunities within the waste andsanitation sector to be able to incorporate a gender lensin the circular design (OECD 2020). According to UNEPIETC and GRID-Arendal (2019a), bringing gender equalityinto the waste sector will catalyze gender equality inother economic and social sectors and accelerate theability of governments to meet their broader global andnational equality commitments (Figure 1), particularlyfor SDG 4 (quality education), SDG 5 (gender equality),SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities) and SDG 12(responsible consumption and production). A particulargender target under SDG 5 which is highly relevant tothe waste sector, is to “ensure women’s full and effectiveparticipation and equal opportunities for leadership atall levels of decision-making in political, economic andpublic life.”Effective waste management is expensive, often comprising 20 to 50% of municipal budgets (World Bank 2019a).1

RESOURCE RECOVERY & REUSE SERIES 211.b1.4INDICATORSTARGETS83. .931172316LON IFELANDLIFEBELOW WATER151414.1ATECLIM NIOACT13.b13SDGsLEVELS OFRELEVANCE FOR THEGENDER - WASTENEXUS7125.15.25.45.5GENDEREQUALITY55.a5.b5.c6 ANCLEAN WAD SATERTIONNITA6.3AFFOREA AN 9.39.4VERY HIGH RELEVANCE9.cTARGETSINDICATORS8.811.6.512 2.41 2.31 2.214RKWO ICNT OMCE ONDE EC WTHDAN GRO.a12 .812ITY NALQU ATIOUCEDCLSUSC TACO ITIE INABMM S A LEUN NDITIES13.2TRY,INDUSANDATION REINNOVCTUSTRUINFRAEBLSI ION NON PT TIOPS UM UCRE NS ODCO PRDAN3.d4.14.24.34.44.54.64.74.a4.bGAN OD ODW HEL EAL- LTBE HINGZEHU RONGEREICST GJU ON SE, TR IONAC S UTPE AND TITSINSHIP SRSLTNE GOAPAR THERFONO POVERTY.b16STORICADINETSRGTAHIGH RELEVANCESOME RELEVANCEFIGURE 1. RELEVANCE OF SDG TARGETS AND INDICATORS FOR THE GENDER–WASTE NEXUS(SOURCE: MODIFIED FROM UNEP-IETC AND GRID-ARENDAL 2019B).2. FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDYThe study is based on a review of literature2 with a focuson gender aspects in the circular economy and resourcerecovery within the waste and sanitation sectors forreuse, particularly in agriculture. The main emphasisis thus on organic waste and wastewater managementand the recovery of plant nutrients, organic matter andreclaimed water, complementing a previous report in thesame series on energy recovery (Njenga and Mendum2018).The emphasis is on urban waste for closing therural–urban resource loop at scale. This can be foodwaste, agro-industrial waste or fecal sludge from on-22site sanitation systems or wastewater (sewage) andgreywater from kitchens. With an emphasis on scaling,the report will only touch on household-based recyclingefforts, such as backyard composting.The study tries to apply a gender lens and addressgender patterns in the formal and informal, privateand public sectors. The common scarcity of genderdisaggregated data in the waste and recycling sectordoes not allow general statements across countries, aseven the larger surveys or reviews (e.g. IWA 2014) ongender and sanitation only refer to a subset of countriesor cases with large cultural diversity.The review builds in several sections on research supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) and/or its partners, like theRUAF Global Partnership, International Water Management Institute (IWMI), International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA) and WorldAgroforestry (ICRAF). Asterisks (*) in the reference list indicate these sources.

GENDER DIMENSIONS OF SOLID AND LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR REUSE IN AGRICULTURE IN ASIA AND AFRICAThe study gives due attention to the reality of reuse,e.g. untreated wastewater irrigation, with particularemphasis on gender differences that are important forthe promotion of safety interventions.Although RRR can leverage private capital andsupport cost recovery within the sanitation servicechain, with the ultimate benefit of more functionalservice delivery (Rao et al. 2017), the report willremain as far as possible focused on RRR and willnot explore the wider nexus between gender andWater, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH), such as thebenefits of investments in toilets, which have beenextensively described (Dankelman et al. 2009; Geertzand Iyer 2018; MacArthur et al. 2020).The report is structured into two main parts covering solidand liquid waste management and resource recovery. Itstarts with an analysis of gender roles and issues in solidwaste management and recycling looking at the criticalroles of households as well as the formal and informalsectors. The second part applies a gender lens towastewater treatment, the social acceptance of reclaimedwastewater as well as agricultural reuse and gender rolesalong the value chain of wastewater-irrigated vegetablesin terms of food safety.Based on this analysis, the conclusions point at particularbarriers for gender equality which require priorityattention to operationalize the full potential of RRR fromsolid and liquid waste within a circular economy.3. GENDER ASPECTS IN WASTE MANAGEMENTAND RESOURCE RECOVERYThe following sections differentiate between municipalsolid waste management (MSWM) and sanitation(wastewater and fecal sludge management); in each,the gender lens is applied to the formal and informalsectors. For MSWM, the focus moves from householdsto the city with special attention on waste collectionand recycling activities, including composting, andfor wastewater management from its treatment toits reuse, including stakeholder perceptions. Withinthe wastewater sector, informal reuse of untreatedwastewater is a common reality over nearly 30 millionha (Thebo et al. 2017) so special attention is givento the gender roles for securing food safety alongthe wastewater-irrigated food chain. Processeswhich link the sanitation and MSWM sectors, atthe household level, or through the co-compostingof fecal sludge and organic (food) waste at the citylevel, are only mentioned if they have particulargender perspectives.3.1. Municipal Solid WasteManagement and ResourceRecoveryGender roles and dynamics can have great influence onaccess and control over resources that in turn impact theproduction and recycling process. This refers in the RRRcontext first of all to the waste resource itself, apart from thecommon challenges of start-ups to access such as finance(Box 1), information, technology and so forth, which can all bechallenging, in particular for women entrepreneurs (Hovorkaet al. 2009; Muspratt 2016a, 2016b; Di Mario et al. 2018).In a city, different waste-related processes and streams aresignificantly interlinked with the usually complementary rolesof the informal and formal sectors, each with a particulargender dimension as illustrated for MSWM in Kathmandu,Nepal (Figure 2). In an ideal circular economy, the processesin support of RRR are interlinked across scales, from thehousehold level to the municipal level.3

RESOURCE RECOVERY & REUSE SERIES 21BOX 1. INVESTMENT CLIMATE FOR COMPOSTING ENTERPRISES – INSIGHTS FROM WOMEN ENTREPRENEURSIN KENYA.In an assessment of the investment climate for private companies engaged in nutrient recovery in Kenya, access tofinance was flagged by both male and female entrepreneurs as the most severe constraint to their businesses. Femaleentrepreneurs were particularly intimidated by the collateral requirements for debt, which in general discouraged bothmale and female entrepreneurs from submitting an application. In the compost sector, where only a small percentage offirms is run by women, the female-owned firms rely exclusively on internal funds to finance initial investment. However,male-owned firms finance 22% of their initial investment with grants from national or international donors. Womenentrepreneurs identified loan interest rate, rigidness regarding loan-related analysis and collateral, and knowledge aboutaccess to loans as the key impediments towards access to finance. As a result, women have to rely on less formalsources such as friends and relatives to provide them with limited funds for investment and hence their businessesremain informal and small scale. Access to different forms of finances are key reform priorities that need to be put inplace to address the gender disparities in accessing resources for businesses.GENDER MAP OFWASTE MANAGEMENTIN KATHMANDU, NEPALFEMALE MAJORITYFROM HOUSEHOLDS56%FROMINSTITUTIONSCOMMERCEETC.44%TOTAL WASTE GENERATEDPLASTICS2/3 OF HOUSHOLDSSEGREGATEORGANIC WASTEFOOD RESIDUES%TRASHMETALSPAPER PRODUCTSGLASSOTHERSSTREET SWEEPERSSUBSIDIESTRAININGHOUSHOLDSFORMAL WASTE COLLECTION(PUBLIC & PRIVATE COMPANIES)INFORMAL WASTE COLLECTIONWASTECOLLECTIONSCRAP WASTE DEALERSWASTE MANAGEMENTCOMPANIESMANAGERS OF TRANSFERSTATIONSNONGOVERNMENTALORGANIZATIONSWASTE SEGREGATIONWORKERSTRAININGPUBLIC SPACESTREET PICKERSTRUCK DRIVERSKATHMANDUMUNICIPALITYPUBLIC INSTITUTIONSandPRIVATE ORGANIZATIONSCOMMUNITY VOLUNTEERSTRAINING & ASSISTANCERUBBER & LEATHERTEXTILESHOUSEHOLD WASTECOMPOSITIONCOMPOSTINGAT HOMESIGNIFICANT NUMBEROF MINORSHOUSEHOLD WASTE MANAGERSSCRAP WASTE COLLECTIONSMALE MAJORITYSource: Authors’ unpublished data.WASTE PICKERSCRAFTS FROM WASTEINFORMAL SECTORTRAINING & ASSISTANCESISDOLE LANDFILLFIGURE 2. GENDER MAP OF WASTE MANAGEMENT IN KATHMANDU, NEPAL (SOURCE: MODIFIED FROM UNEP-IETCAND GRID-ARENDAL 2019A).4

GENDER DIMENSIONS OF SOLID AND LIQUID WASTE MANAGEMENT FOR REUSE IN AGRICULTURE IN ASIA AND AFRICA3.1.1 Household-based Waste ManagementIt is noteworthy that many waste-transforming businessmodels operating at an urban scale significantly dependon household-based processes and behavior as thisis where most of the waste is usually generated. Buthouseholds also have a tremendous collective capacityto reduce the flow of waste into the system, both throughconsumption practices and waste management aswell as in-situ recycling strategies. Household needsand structures must therefore be included in all wastemanagement plans. Women play a key role in this contextfrom waste generation (such as grey water and foodwaste in kitchens, and grey water from washing laundryand bathing children) and waste management which isoften the responsibility of women and makes them animportant target for efforts supporting waste reduction,segregation, composting and recycling (UNEP-IETC andGRID-Arendal 2019a).In a four-country comparison, presented by OceanConservancy (2019), the women of the householdsin India, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam wereprimarily, if not solely responsible for managing householdwaste, whether this was mixed or segregated.Indonesia and India had the highest percentage ofrespondents reporting that women are solely responsiblefor household waste followed by the Philippines. Vietnamhad a smaller percentage of respondents who identifieddisposal as a ‘women only’ task reflecting the higherinstances of shared responsibility among men and womenin Vietnam. As waste composting works best based ondecentralized household waste segregation3 into at leastorganic and inorganic components, women – and notmen – in these countries have to be the primary targetgroup for any household training on waste segregation.Projects that do not understand who is in charge of wasteat the household level are likely to fail as experiences fromKumasi in Ghana show, where children have a key rolein household waste disposal (Danso et al. 2004). OtherRRR-related roles commonly associated with women atthe household level are: The cultivation of backyard gardens using householdwaste resources as inputs (food waste compost,grey water for irrigation) unless the compost getsconfiscated by men (Quansah et al. 2001). Where waste is externally treated or recycled, womenare the key customers for dry energy or biogas (Njengaand Mendum 2018) while compost marketing mightbypass women (Nkedi-Kizza et al. 2014). Women are more likely to experience the negativeside-effects of unsustainable waste management,3given their responsibility for collecting water, changingdiapers (excreta contact) and gathering biofuel andfood, which makes them more exposed to human andenvironmental health hazards and a key target groupfor capacity development in safe waste handling andreuse.Given that women are more exposed to householdwaste than men and are often the household membersin charge of waste management, any RRR campaignwhich starts at the household (waste segregation, safetymeasures) has to target women whether they are thehead of the household or not.Households, which currently have the least formalengagement with the waste sector’s power and policystructures, may be the pivotal sites for reform. Householdshave tremendous collective capacity to reduce the flowof waste into the system, both through consumptionpractices and waste management and recyclingstrategies. Household needs and structures must beincluded in all waste management plans. Methodologiesshould be developed to assess the value of sustainableeco-services that are currently provided on an unpaidbasis by women managing waste in households andcommunities. This will enable policies to be based on amore accurate view of the waste value chain (UNEP-IETCand GRID-Arendal 2019a).Women can also play a significant role in community-basedrecycling activities such as waste composting (Gathuru etal. 2009). In India, for example, women organized in selfhelp groups or waste picker associations are increasinglyengaged in local composting activities (see below)3.1.2 Waste Collection and RecyclingBusinesses in the Formal SectorOnce the household waste is collected, waste ownershipshifts to the municipality. The last three decades haveseen many cities partnering with larger firms to managetheir solid waste, including organic waste collection andcomposting, while small and micro-enterprises supportthe collection of fecal sludge from households. Thesearrangements can move the ownership of the waste tothe private sector based on the operational contract, withpotentially negative consequences for informal wastecollectors and recyclers who will have to compete withlarger companies who can legally claim the materials thatprovide individuals, waste picker associations or smallenterprises with a livelihood (Samson 2009; U

3.1.2 Waste Collection and Recycling Businesses in the Formal Sector 5 3.1.3 Waste Collection and Recycling Activities in the Informal Sector 7 3.2 Gender in Wastewater Management and Reuse 10 3.2.1 Wastewater Treatment 10 3.2.2 Acceptance of Wastewater Reuse 11 3.2.3 Wastewater Reuse in Agriculture 12

Related Documents:

accessible and diverse gender information. It is one of a family of knowledge services based at IDS . Other recent publications in the Cutting Edge Pack series: Gender and Care, 2009 Gender and Indicators, 2007 Gender and Sexuality, 2007 Gender and Trade, 2006 Gender and Migration, 2005 Gender and ICTs, 2004 . 6.3.1 Gender mainstreaming .

ASME B16.11 Tees Dimensions ASME B16.11 Reducers Dimensions ASME B16.11 Bushing Dimensions ASME B16.11 Caps Dimensions ASME B16.11 Crosses Dimensions ASME B16.11 Couplings Dimensions ASME B16.11 Plugs Dimensions ASME B16.11/BS 3799 Pipe Nipples Dimensions BS 3799 Unions Dimensions ASME B16.11/BS 3799 Swag

keywords: gender identity bill - gender identity - gender discrimination – equality - human rights - european union law - national law. malta’s gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics act – a shift from a binary gender to a whole new spectrum?

Brief 1.Gender and countering transnational organized crime and trafficking Brief 2.Gender and countering corruption Brief 3.Gender and terrorism prevention Brief 4.Gender and justice Brief 5.Gender and health and livelihoods Annexes Checklists for gender mainstreaming

7 In order to effectively mainstream gender in an organisation, the staff should be able to: n Identify gender inequalities in their field of activity; n Define gender equality objectives; n Take account of gender when planning and implementing policies and programmes; n Monitor progress; n Evaluate programmes from a gender perspective. Principles of gender mainstreaming

connectivity and gender. The Gender Flagship is rallying coalition members to work together to highlight and address the gender dimensions of the COVID-19 school crisis and safeguard progress made on gender equality in education in recent decades. This report presents the work of the Gender Flagship in 2020, and its plans for 2021.

Total suspended solid and total dissolved solid: Total solid (TS) refers to the matter that remains as residue upon evaporation and drying at 103-105 C.The total solid includes total suspended solid (TSS) - the portion of the total solid retained by filter and total dissolved solid (TDS) - the portion that passes through the filter.

D-35 Johnny Cash D-12 David Crosby D-18 SS D-7 Roger McGuinn BODY SIZE & TYPE BACK & SIDES MODEL NAME TOP Dreadnought Solid East Indian Rosewood D-35 Johnny Cash* Solid Engelmann Spruce Solid Quilted Mahogany D-12 David Crosby* Solid Carpathian Spruce Solid Genuine Mahogany D-18 SS* Solid Sitka Spruce Solid East Indian Rosewood D-7 Roger