Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment (GHVTRA)

1y ago
7 Views
1 Downloads
1.16 MB
34 Pages
Last View : 30d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Mika Lloyd
Transcription

Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic RiskAssessment (GHVTRA)Hazard Identification Workshop 1HandbookJanuary 2018

Publication and Contact InformationFor more information contact: Scott FergusonSpill Prevention, Preparedness and Response ProgramP.O. Box 47600Olympia, WA 98504-7600Phone: 360-407-7465Washington State Department of Ecology - www.ecology.wa.govo Headquarters, Olympia360-407-6000o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue425-649-7000o Southwest Regional Office, Olympia360-407-6300o Central Regional Office, Union Gap509-575-2490o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane509-329-3400iiJanuary 2018

STATE OF WASHINGTONDEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGYPO Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 360-407-6000711 for Washington Relay Service Persons with a speech disability can call 877-833-6341December 29, 2017Thank you for participating in the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment workshops! We areprivileged to have this opportunity to bring tribes and stakeholders together to identify ways we canimprove oil spill prevention and response preparedness in this significant waterway and ecosystem. Yourparticipation is vital to ensure we consider all relevant information, and produce the best possibleinformation and regionally specific recommendations from this work.To ensure you are able to fully participate, please take time to review this handbook before theworkshop. You'll find the workshop agenda, background information, instructions on what we wouldlike participants to do ahead of time, and templates to help you capture your thoughts. The templates willbe used during the workshop to structure our conversations and record everyone's contributions.We are fortunate to live in an area with unparalleled social, cultural, economic, and environmentalresources and opportunities. Our region is also unique in the robust and effective forums that exist toimprove maritime safety and prevent oil from entering the water. Participants in these forums includetribes, government agencies, industry, nongovernmental organizations, and citizens, each with animportant role to play and interests to safeguard. The state legislature recognizes the damage that an oilspill on our waters could cause to our resources, and they have consistently invested in a comprehensiveSpills Prevention, Preparedness, and Response program to mitigate these risks. The Grays Harbor VesselTraffic Risk Assessment is an important step in our work to protect our states sensitive resources. As aresult of all of these factors, Washington has one of the lowest spill rates in the nation.However, we all realize that a major spill could be catastrophic. In keeping with the collaborative natureof our maritime forums, we look forward to forthright and detailed conversations about how we cancontinue to improve spill prevention and preparedness. Thank you again for dedicating your time andenergy to this important shared work.I look forward to seeing you at the workshop.Sincerely,Dale Jensen Program M:JagerSpill Prevention, Preparedness, and ResponseiiiJanuary 2018

Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic RiskAssessment (GHVTRA)Hazard Identification Workshop 1HandbookSPPR ProgramWashington State Department of EcologyOlympia, WashingtonivJanuary 2018

This page is purposely left blankvJanuary 2018

ContentsPublication and Contact Information . iiWorkshop Agenda .1Hazard Identification Scope .1Expected Outcomes .1Agenda .1About this Handbook .3Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment .4Background .4Goals .4Process .4Initial Focus .5Workshop Schedule .6Hazard Identification .6Background .6Approach .6Hazard Identification Scope .6Expected outcomes .8Process .8Workshop Materials .10Waterway Areas .10Hazard Identification Templates .12Instructions .12Template 1: Area 1, Underway, Collision .13Template 2: Area 1, Underway, Allision/Grounding .14Template 3: Area 1, Underway, Structural Failure/Flooding .15Template 4: Area 2, Underway, Collision/Allision/Grounding .16Template 5: Area 2, Anchored, Allision/Grounding .17Template 6: Area 3, Underway, Collision/Allision/Grounding .18Template 7: Area 4, Underway, Collision/Allision/Grounding .19Template 8: Area 4, Mooring/Unmooring, Collision/Allision/Grounding .20Template 9: Area 4, Moored, Oil Spill .21viJanuary 2018

Template 10: Area 4, Moored, Fire/Explosion .22Glossary and References .23Glossary .23References .26viiJanuary 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookWorkshop AgendaHazard Identification ScopeConduct a series of workshops to: Identify local factors associated with hazards to commercial vessel operations in GraysHarbor that could result in an oil spillDevelop regionally specific recommendations to improve oil spill prevention andpreparednessExpected OutcomesThe workshop will produce a list of local factors related to oil spill hazards for commercialcargo, passenger, towing and tank vessels greater than 300 gross tons.Agenda8:30WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS – Dale Jensen, Program Manager, WA StateDept. of Ecology Spill Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Program8:40SAFETY BRIEFING AND WORKSHOP OVERVIEW – Scott Ferguson and BrianKirk; WA State Dept. of Ecology Spill Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Program;Workshop Facilitators 9:00HAZARD IDENTIFICATION PROCESS 9:15Safety proceduresGrays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment processHazard Identification Workshop 1 scope and objectivesAgenda ReviewMeeting ground rules and decision making approachWaterway AreasTemplate ReviewHAZARD IDENTIFICATION Structured brainstorming using templates10:30 BREAK1January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook10:45 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, CONTINUED Structured brainstorming using templates12:00 WORKING LUNCH Discuss Response Capability Workshop;Discuss Commercial Fishing, Tribal Fishing, and Recreational Vessel Oil SpillPrevention and Response Workshop; orContinue hazard identification, if required based on progress12:45 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION, CONTINUED Structured brainstorming using templates3:45BREAK/PREPARE WORKSHOP OUTPUT4:00REVIEW OUTPUT FROM WORKSHOP List of local factorsOther ideas/considerations identified by participants4:15OVERVIEW OF HAZARD IDENTIFICATION WORKSHOP 24:30ADJOURN2January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookAbout this HandbookThis handbook is intended to provide you with all the material you will need to successfullyprepare for, and participate in, the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment HazardIdentification Workshop 1.Before the workshop, please review this handbook, and complete the “Local Factors”section of the Hazard Identification templates. Detailed instructions are on page 12.Additional handbooks will be provided for the other workshops in this assessment, includingHazard Identification Workshop 2, the Response Capability Workshop, and the CommercialFishing, Tribal Fishing, and Recreational Vessel Oil Spill Prevention and PreparednessWorkshop.The following two sections of the handbook give background information on the Grays HarborVessel Traffic Risk Assessment, and describe our approach to Hazard Identification.The Workshop Material section has a figure showing the waterway, and the hazard identificationtemplates that we will complete during the workshop.A glossary and references are provided at the end of the handbook to help you prepare for theworkshop, and for your use during the workshop.3January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookGrays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk AssessmentBackgroundEcology received funding in the 2017-2019 budget to continue our oil spill prevention riskassessment work. Our current funding supports a risk assessment for oil spills from commercialvessels in Grays Harbor, and a rail traffic risk assessment. This builds on previous work,including: 2014 Marine and Rail Oil Transportation Study (Ecology, 2015)2015 update to a vessel traffic risk assessment for Strait of Juan de Fuca, Puget Sound,San Juan Islands and connecting waterways (Van Dorp, 2017)2016 Salish Sea Oil Spill Risk Reduction Workshop (Ecology, 2016)2017 Columbia River Vessel Traffic Evaluation and Safety Risk Assessment (Ecology,2017)GoalsThe goals of the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment are to: Assess baseline and changing oil spill risks from commercial vessels operating in GraysHarborIdentify measures that could help reduce the risks of oil spillsAssess oil spill response preparednessIdentify baseline response capabilityProcessEcology is following the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Formal Safety Assessment(FSA) process to conduct the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment (IMO, 2002).Adopted by the IMO in 2002, Formal Safety Assessments use a structured and systematicmethodology to assess the risks relating to maritime safety and the protection of the marineenvironment, and for evaluating the costs and benefits of options for reducing these risks (IMO,2002). The FSA process includes the following steps: Preparatory Stepo Definition of Goals, Systems, OperationsStep 1: Hazard IdentificationStep 2: Risk AnalysisStep 3: Risk Control OptionsStep 4: Cost Benefit AssessmentStep 5: Recommendations for Decision Making4January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookInitial FocusEcology’s focus during fiscal year 2018 (July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018), is completing thepreparatory step and Step 1, Hazard Identification. We are facilitating two workshops to conductthe Hazard Identification. Two additional workshops will extend the Hazard Identificationprocess. The first will discuss oil spill response preparedness and the second will focus oncommercial fishing, tribal fishing, and recreational vessel oil spill prevention and preparedness.A schedule of all workshops is shown below.During the first Hazard Identification workshop, participants will review potential incidents thatcould result in oil spills from commercial vessels, with a goal of identifying any local factors thatcould contribute to these incidents. Examples of local factors may include a submerged jetty thatcould contribute to vessel grounding risks, or a sharp turn in a channel that could contribute tocollision and allision risks. The list of local factors will be the primary outcome of the firstworkshop.In the second Hazard Identification workshop, participants will discuss each local factor listed inthe first workshop, and identify any safeguards currently in place to prevent the incident, and anyhigh-level recommendations that could improve oil spill prevention.The Hazard Identification is centered on the discussion of local factors, rather than other riskcomponents, such as the relative frequency of vessel incidents, or the consequence of oil spills,for two reasons.First, commercial vessel incidents, like collisions or groundings resulting in an oil spill, arerelatively rare events both globally and in the historical data available for Grays Harbor. Ecologydata for 2007-2017 show only one oil spill from a large commercial vessel: a 1-gallon hydraulicoil spill from a cargo ship in 2011 (Ecology, 2017a). The last major oil spill in the vicinity ofGrays Harbor was the oil barge Nestucca in December, 1988 (NOAA, 2017). Rather than askparticipants to provide qualitative judgments about the likelihood of these relatively rare events,the workshop seeks to benefit from local knowledge and expertise about the commerciallynavigable waterway.Additionally, the overall Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment and the HazardIdentification workshops are intended to improve oil spill prevention and preparedness. It isbeyond the scope of this assessment to model potential spill consequences in terms of the fate,transport, and effect of spilled oil.The risk assessment process may end, or pause, after the Hazard Identification is complete.Ecology anticipates making a decision on whether to continue with Steps 2-5 of the FSA processin the spring of 2018 based on the results of the Hazard Identification, and possible changes inAgency and fiscal direction. In addition to this risk assessment, Ecology has a role in the StateEnvironmental Policy Act (SEPA) process for any permitting decisions related to vessel trafficand oil movement.5January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookWorkshop ScheduleDateEventJanuary 25, 2018Hazard Identification Workshop 1Port of Grays HarborHazard Identification Workshop 2Port of Grays HarborResponse Capability WorkshopMcCausland Hall, Westport Maritime MuseumCommercial Fishing, Tribal Fishing, and Recreational Vessel Oil SpillPrevention and Preparedness WorkshopHazard Identification and Response Capability Preliminary ReportFebruary 28, 2018March 28, 2018TBDJune, 2018Hazard IdentificationBackgroundHazard Identification is first step in the Formal Safety Assessment process. The purpose of thisstep is to identify a list of hazards and associated scenarios, prioritized through the use ofscreening criteria, which are specific to the problem under review (IMO, 2002). HazardIdentification can be accomplished through a variety of techniques, such as structured groupbrainstorming or Fault Tree Analysis (ABS, 2000).ApproachEcology will facilitate structured brainstorming discussions to accomplish the HazardIdentification process. The scope, expected outcomes, and process are described below.Hazard Identification ScopeConduct a series of workshops to: Identify local factors associated with hazards to commercial vessel operations in GraysHarbor that could result in an oil spill Develop regionally specific recommendations to improve oil spill prevention andpreparedness.6January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookDetails: Hazards include hazards to navigation and vessel incidents that could result in an oil spill(e.g., collision, allision, grounding, flooding; fire/explosion; structural failure)o Includes consideration of meteorological/hydrographic condition, e.g., highwinds, heavy seas, fog, and tides and currents including cyclical changes and tidalextremeso Does not include region wide hazards, e.g., Cascadia Subduction Zoneearthquake/tsunami The fate and effect of spilled oil will be considered during the Response CapabilityAssessment workshop. In-depth consideration of the environmental, cultural, oreconomic impacts of the spilled oil is beyond the scope of the Hazard Identification andResponse Capability Assessment. Geographic boundarieso Offshore from buoy “GH” (approximately 5nm offshore) to WeyerhaeuserCompany Bay City Log Export, Berths 1 and 2o Workshop may include discussion of offshore vessel traffic management practiceswestward of buoy “GH”, as noted on templates 1 and 2 Types of vessels:o Commercial cargo, passenger, towing, fishing, and tank vessels 300 gross tons Includes specific hazards for different vessel types (e.g., considerations forgrain ships, car carriers, etc.)o Commercial and tribal fishing vessels and recreational vessels 300 gross tons Will be considered during the Hazard Identification workshops asoperations that could impact a commercial cargo, passenger, towing,fishing, or tank vessel 300 gross tons Ecology is planning a workshop to discuss commercial and tribal fishingvessel and recreational vessel oil spill prevention and preparedness forvessels 300 gross tons Oil spillso Oil as defined by the state of Washington RCW 90.56.010: "Oil" or "oils" meansoil of any kind that is liquid at twenty-five degrees Celsius and one atmosphere ofpressure and any fractionation thereof, including, but not limited to, crude oil,bitumen, synthetic crude oil, natural gas well condensate, petroleum, gasoline,fuel oil, diesel oil, biological oils and blends, oil sludge, oil refuse, and oil mixedwith wastes other than dredged spoil. Oil does not include any substance listed inTable 302.4 of 40 C.F.R. Part 302 adopted August 14, 1989, under section 102(a)of the federal comprehensive environmental response, compensation, and liabilityact of 1980, as amended by P.L. 99-4997January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook Vessel activities and incidentso Definitions for vessel activities, incident types, immediate causes, andcontributing factors are provided in the Glossary, and are adapted from 46 CFR,RCW 88.46, WAC 317-31, and the Pacific States/British Columbia Oil Spill TaskForce Data Dictionary Timeframeo Focus on current hazardso Hazard Identification workshops will include qualitative discussions of potentialchanges in hazards or offshore vessel traffic management practices as a result ofany projects that are proposed at the time of the workshopsExpected outcomes Workshop 1:o A list of local factors related to oil spill hazards for commercial cargo, passenger,and tank vessels Workshop 2:o For each local factor identified in Workshop 1 – A description of the causes of thehazard, safeguards intended to prevent the hazard, and any high-levelrecommendations to reduce the likelihood or consequence of the hazardo Description of any identified potential changes to hazards due to changes in vesseltraffic related to proposed projects Following Workshop 2:o A report documenting the Hazard Identification process, workshops, and resultso This report will be combined with the report of the Response CapabilityPreparedness workshop, and the planned workshop discussing commercialfishing, tribal fishing, and recreational vessel oil spill prevention and preparednessProcessEcology will facilitate structured brainstorming discussions to review vessel incidents that couldresult in an oil spill (e.g., collisions, allisions, groundings, fires/explosions, structural failure). Asdescribed above, the goal of these discussions is to identify any local factors that couldcontribute to vessel incidents. Examples of local factors may include a submerged jetty thatcould contribute to vessel grounding risks, or a sharp turn in a channel that could contribute tocollision and allision risks.Hazard identification templates, provided in the Workshop Material section, will be used topromote a systematic consideration of potential local factors. The templates are organized byareas of the waterway, vessel activity, and incident type. Ecology will review each template withworkshop participants, and encourage participants to contribute to the discussion of local factors.8January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookThis page is purposely left blank9January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookWorkshop MaterialsWaterway Areas4312Discussion of offshore vessel traffic managementmay extend westward of buoy “GH”Study boundaryWaterway Area division line10January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookThis page is purposely left blank11January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookHazard Identification TemplatesInstructionsThe templates in this handbook will be used to identify and record local factors associated withhazards to commercial vessel operations in Grays Harbor that could result in an oil spill.To aid your participation in the workshop, please follow these steps:Before the workshop Review each templateRefer to the Waterway Areas figure for a visual depiction of each areao The text description of each area is intended to be generalo If there are differences between the text description and the figure, use the area asshown in the figureConsider how the incident described on the template could occurExamples of possible causes and contributing factors are provided on each template; feelfree to add to these as neededThink about specific features or characteristics of conducting vessel operations in GraysHarbor that could contribute to the incidento General examples of these local factors could include Water depth Navigational channel configuration Tide/current variations Seasonal changes in weather Local operating practices and procedureso This is not a complete list – we are counting on your knowledge and expertise tohelp identify as many local factors as possibleo Write your list of local factors in the space provided on the templateo Please include specific details. This will improve the process, and will add to theaccuracy and usefulness of the outcomes from the workshopDuring the workshop Use your list of local factors, and any causes and contributing factors you identified, tocontribute to the discussion of each template12January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookTemplate 1: Area 1, Underway, CollisionUsing this template See complete instructions in the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment(GHVTRA) Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook, page 12.Before the workshop, review each template and consider the described incidento Examples of how the incident could occur and possible causes are provided. Addto these as neededo Think about local factors (specific features or characteristics of operating acommercial vessel in Grays Harbor) that could contribute to the incidento Write your list of local factors on this templateDuring the workshop, use your list of local factors, and any causes and contributingfactors you identified, to contribute to the discussion of each templateArea 1: Bar Channel and Entrance Channel to Point Chehalis Reach (inside buoy 11)Vessel Activity: UnderwayIncident Category: CollisionHow could an incident occur? Contact with a fishing net or crab potDifficulty crossing the barFailure to maintain position in channelFailure to negotiate turn to entrance channelFailure to take action to avoid another vesselIncident related to vessels offshore, including areas westward of buoy “GH”Possible immediate causes/contributing factors (examples) EnvironmentalEquipment failureo Resulting in full or partial loss of electrical powero Resulting in full or partial loss of propulsiono Resulting in loss of navigational equipmento Resulting in loss of steeringHuman errorOrganization/maintenance failureOtherLocal factors 13January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookTemplate 2: Area 1, Underway, Allision/GroundingUsing this template See complete instructions in the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment(GHVTRA) Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook, page 12 Before the workshop, review each template and consider the described incidento Examples of how the incident could occur and possible causes are provided. Addto these as neededo Think about local factors (specific features or characteristics of operating acommercial vessel in Grays Harbor) that could contribute to the incidento Write your list of local factors on this template During the workshop, use your list of local factors, and any causes and contributingfactors you identified, to contribute to the discussion of each templateArea 1: Bar Channel and Entrance Channel to Point Chehalis Reach (inside buoy 11)Vessel Activity: UnderwayIncident Category: Allision/GroundingHow could an incident occur? Contact with a buoy, fishing net or crab pot Contact with jetty Difficulty crossing the bar Failure to maintain position in channel Failure to negotiate turn to entrance channel Ground outside harbor Ground outside of entrance channel Ground on submerged jetty Incident related to vessels offshore, including areas westward of buoy “GH”Possible immediate causes/contributing factors (examples) Environmental Equipment failureo Resulting in full or partial loss of electrical powero Resulting in full or partial loss of propulsiono Resulting in loss of navigational equipmento Resulting in loss of steering Human error Organization/maintenance failure OtherLocal factors 14January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookTemplate 3: Area 1, Underway, Structural Failure/FloodingUsing this template See complete instructions in the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment(GHVTRA) Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook, page 12 Before the workshop, review each template and consider the described incidento Examples of how the incident could occur and possible causes are provided. Addto these as neededo Think about local factors (specific features or characteristics of operating acommercial vessel in Grays Harbor) that could contribute to the incidento Write your list of local factors on this template During the workshop, use your list of local factors, and any causes and contributingfactors you identified, to contribute to the discussion of each templateArea 1: Bar Channel and Entrance Channel to Point Chehalis Reach (inside buoy 11)Vessel Activity: UnderwayIncident Category: Structural Failure/FloodingHow could an incident occur? Severe weather conditions while crossing barPossible immediate causes/contributing factors (examples) Environmental Equipment failure Human error Organization/maintenance failure OtherLocal factors 15January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookTemplate 4: Area 2, Underway, Collision/Allision/GroundingUsing this template See complete instructions in the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment(GHVTRA) Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook, page 12 Before the workshop, review each template and consider the described incidento Examples of how the incident could occur and possible causes are provided. Addto these as neededo Think about local factors (specific features or characteristics of operating acommercial vessel in Grays Harbor) that could contribute to the incidento Write your list of local factors on this template During the workshop, use your list of local factors, and any causes and contributingfactors you identified, to contribute to the discussion of each templateArea 2: Point Chehalis Reach and South Reach to buoys 17/18; North Channel;Westport MarinaVessel Activity: UnderwayIncident Category: Collision/Allision/GroundingHow could an incident occur? Contact with a buoy Failure to maintain position in channel Failure to negotiate turn to South Reach Failure to take action to avoid another vessel Ground outside of channelPossible immediate causes/contributing factors (examples) Environmental Equipment failureo Resulting in full or partial loss of electrical powero Resulting in full or partial loss of propulsiono Resulting in loss of navigational equipmento Resulting in loss of steering Human error Organization/maintenance failure OtherLocal factors 16January 2018

GHVTRA Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant HandbookTemplate 5: Area 2, Anchored, Allision/GroundingUsing this template See complete instructions in the Grays Harbor Vessel Traffic Risk Assessment(GHVTRA) Hazard Identification Workshop 1 Participant Handbook, page 12 Before the workshop, review each template and consider the

Handbook January 2018 . ii January 2018 Publication and Contact Information For more information contact: Scott Ferguson . Port of Grays Harbor February 28, 2018 Hazard Identification Workshop 2 Port of Grays Harbor March 28, 2018 Response Capability Workshop McCausland Hall, Westport Maritime Museum

Related Documents:

2018 Grays Harbor Business Survey Report for Grays Harbor County . October 17, 2018 . Submitted by: Alan Hardcastle and Yi Jen Wang . For: Greater Grays Harbor, Inc. SESRC . Social & Economic Sciences Research Center (SESRC) Puget Sound Division Washington State University . PO Box 43170 Olympia, Washington 98504-3170 Telephone: (360) 586-9292

Ref # 2022 Priority 6th Field Watershed Name Watershed County Site Name Road # BMP EMP 1009 2 Cook Creek Grays Harbor 2257086 0 1.6 208 1A Cook Creek Grays Harbor Cook Creek Pit 2257087 0.2 0.2 212 2 Cook Creek Grays Harbor 2258000 0 5.3 961 1A West Fork Humptulips River Grays Harbor WF Hump unit F7 temp road A 2258000 4.75 4.75

Grays Harbor Pilots Association signed agreements Grays Harbor, Hart of labor agreement Grays and Willapa Harbor Pilots Association Halvorsen Towing Company agreements, etc. Hawaiian Island Ferry System Haynes, Earl D. Independent Towboat Operators' Association Ketchikan Spruce Mills LaBow Haynes Company bonds, etc . Leppauleto, Russell 1962 1959

Welcome to Grays Harbor College . and the 2011-12 Academic Year! At Grays Harbor College, we have a long-standing tradition - for more than 80 years now -- of encouraging the success of our students, whether they are working towards an associate degree . with plans to transfer on to a four-year college or university,

Olympia, WA 98504-7600 Telephone: (360) 407-7472 Adams Benton Asotin Chelan Clallam Clark Columbia Cowlitz Douglas Fe r r y Franklin Ga rfie ld Gra nt Gra ys Harbor Island Jefferson King K i t s a p . Chehalis/Grays Harbor Watershed Detailed Implementation Plan Page i . List of Tables Table 1. Potential Causes of DO, Temperature, and Bacteria .

vessel as, ASME code enables design of Horizontal or a Vertical vessel but there was no provision for an Inclined Vessel in it. The . Skirt Support for High Pressure Vessel Using Finite Element Method K Tamil Mannan et al. (2009) Pressure vessel is a closed cylindrical vessel for storing

2/27/2011 6 11 37220 - Iliac angioplasty, initial vessel 37221 - Iliac stent, initial vessel 37222 - Iliac angioplasty, additional vessel 37223 - Iliac stent, additional vessel 0238T - Iliac atherectomy, each vessel, (bill separately) - Use 1 initial vessel and up to 2 additional vessel .

in Acute Mental Health Care was launched in the Houses of Parliament. A joint production with The Princess Royal Trust for Carers and the National Mental Health Development; the guide received a positive reception from professionals, carers and service users alike. Carers Trust is a new charity formed by the merger of The Princess Royal Trust for Carers and Crossroads Care. Carers Trust now .