Engage In Practice: Hosting Math Competitions In College Of Engineering

1y ago
6 Views
2 Downloads
717.72 KB
14 Pages
Last View : 17d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Melina Bettis
Transcription

Paper ID #32402Engage in Practice: Hosting Math Competitions in College of EngineeringDr. Ziliang Zhou, California Baptist UniversityZiliang Zhou is a professor of Mechanical Engineering at California Baptist Universityc American Society for Engineering Education, 2021

Engage in Practice: Hosting Math Competitions in the College of EngineeringAbstractThis paper shares the experience of community engagement through hosting math competitionsfor the local middle and high school students. This engagement had positive impact not only onrecruiting prospect students for our engineering programs but also on providing a serviceopportunity for our engineering students (Our students are required to accumulate 30 hours ofcommunity services as part of the graduation requirement). Over the last 10 years, thisengagement had gradually become an integral part of the engineering curriculum.Many universities around the country hosted math competitions for their local schools, typicallyby their math departments. Many institutions limited their involvement in offering the facilityonly and not much beyond that. The math competitions hosted by our institution were organizedby the College of Engineering. In addition to offering the facility, we were actively involved inrunning the competitions with our engineering students serving as proctors and graders. Over theyears, hosting math competitions had become the most common service opportunity for theengineering students. Our students not only enjoyed the service activity but also appreciated theconnection with the prospect engineering students.During the competitions, we also opened our labs for tours and showed the competing studentsand parents the connections between the math and the engineering professions.This paper will outline the detail process of hosting math competitions (MATHCOUNTS formiddle school and AMC10/12/AIME for high school), the preliminary impact of thisengagement, the key lessons learned, and the future research plan for quantitative assessment ofthe impact.The overall objective of this work is to share our experiences and the detail processes so thatother institutions in our ASEE community may use as a reference if they choose to host mathcompetitions for their local schools.Introduction to MATHCOUNTSMATHCOUNTS is an annual national math competition program aimed at enhancing problemsolving skills for middle school students through a series of math competitions at the local, state,and national levels. Currently in its 38th year [1], MATHCOUNTS is one of the largest and mostsuccessful education partnerships involving volunteers, educators, industry sponsors, parents,and students in this country. Local professional engineers volunteered their time to organize thecompetitions as MATHCOUNTS Coordinators. As an extracurricular activity, MATHCOUNTSrecognizes and rewards students for pursuing a deeper understanding of math concepts and theirapplications in science, technology, and engineering (STEM) fields.

MATHCOUNTS was designed for 6th-8th graders. Each fall when the school semester begins,the participating schools register with the national MATHCOUNTS office and assign a coach,usually a math teacher or sometimes a volunteer parent, to lead math club activity either afterschool or during the 7th period of the school schedule. The coach receives the annualMATHCOUNTS School Handbook [2] and the previous year competition materials [3] to trainstudents on topics and problem solving skills usually not covered in school math classes. Thetopics include arithmetic, algebra, geometry, number theory, and combinatorics. The level ofdifficulties of those math problems increases gradually as the students progressing through aseries of organized math competitions at four different levels: school, chapter, state, and national.The competition problems at all four levels were created by the MATHCOUNTS national officeeach year.The school competition is usually administered by the coach and is used, along with otherperformance measures at the discretion of the coach, to select the school team members tocompete at the chapter competition.At the chapter competition in February, each school is allowed to send maximum one teamconsists of four students and six additional students competing as individuals. Then the winningteams and individuals at the chapter competition move on to the state competition in March.The number of teams and the individuals allowed to compete at the state competition isdetermined by the number of participating schools at the chapter competition. After the statecompetition, the top four individuals move on to the national competition in May.Each competing student at the national competition receives a graphic calculator in addition to atrophy. All members of the national winning team and the first place individual receive a laptop,an expense-paid trip to the Space Camp, and a meeting with the president in the White House[1].The participating students at each level all received valuable training in logic thinking andproblem solving. Many of them continued math activities and competitions in high school andchose college majors in STEM related fields. Most of them cited years later the positive impactof MATHCOUNTS in their career and life.In this work, we would like to share our experiences and the detail processes so that others in ourASEE community may use as a reference when hosting math competitions for their localschools.MATHCOUNTS at our UniversityThe College of Engineering has been hosting the local MATHCOUNTS chapter competition formore than ten years. The engineering students acted as proctors and graders as part of theirengineering service activity. Including students, teachers, parents, and siblings, this eventattracted several hundred people each year to the campus on a Saturday between 8am to 3pm.Many of the youngsters set their feet on a college campus for the first time in their life, an

excellent marketing opportunity in promoting university academic programs. The College ofEngineering offered a 10,000 scholarship to the winners of the competition if they choose toattend the College of Engineering upon graduating from high school.Due to the successful chapter competition held at our university, in 2018, the governing board ofthe state MATHCOUNTS [4] moved the state competition from its previous location to ouruniversity. The state competition was hosted successfully by the College of Engineering twice(moved to online in 2020 and 2021 due to the pandemic).We will now describe the detail processes of the MATHCOUNTS competitions hosted by theCollege of Engineering, the preliminary results and the impact of this community engagement toboth local middle school students and our own engineering students, the lessons learned, theexpansion of hosting high school math competitions (AMC10 and AMC12), and the futureresearch plan associated with this engagement.Organizing MATHCOUNTS in the College of EngineeringAt the start of fall semester, the MATHCOUNTS chapter Coordinator (also a faculty member atthe College of Engineering) worked with the university facility office to book all needed roomsfor the competitions. Then, an email was sent to all chapter school MATHCOUNTS coaches toinvite them to register. The Coordinator kept monitoring the registration status, answeringcoaches’ questions and special accommodation requests, and encouraging them to participate. Toincrease participation, the Coordinator always accepted late registration beyond the deadline,even up to the night before the competition.In the meantime, the Coordinator started to recruit volunteers, mostly from the freshmanengineering students at the university. In a typical chapter competition, around 50 studentsvolunteered their time on a Saturday morning to work as proctors and graders. This numberincreased to about 100 for the state competition (more on state competition later). In addition,testing materials, certificates, and trophies were ordered.One month prior to the competition, the actual competition planning kicked into high gear. Inthis phase, the number of competing students were determined with the proper amount ofmaterials in each competition classroom. Lunch for the competing students was ordered with theuniversity cafeteria. The names of the competing students were requested for printing certificatesof participation.One week prior to the competition, the names of the competing students were entered into thescoring software. The competition date and time were confirmed with all volunteers. Sparestationary items and calculators were prepared, in case some kids forgot to bring them on thecompetition day.In the morning of the competition day, the training was held for all volunteers for their specificroles and processes, including the steps of checking in the competing students, the proctoringrules of the competitions, and the grading process.

Shortly after 8am, the arriving coaches started to check in their competing students. Then, thecoach meeting was held to hand out the certificates. Soon, the building was full of excitingstudents and nervous parents.Before 9am, the names of the schools were called, and the corresponding students were led intotheir competing classrooms. The written competition began.While the competing students buried their heads inside the classrooms, the coaches, parents, andsiblings were given the chance to tour the engineering building and labs. We will discuss the labtour a little later.There were three parts on the written competition: individual Sprint round without using thecalculator, individual Target round allowing calculator, and the Team round among the fourstudents each school selected. There were 10 minute break between rounds.The written competition typically completed between 11:30 and noon. The competing studentswere treated a buffet lunch at the university cafeteria. For many students, this was the best part ofthe competition.During this period, the grading room was busy with grading work. All papers were graded twicewith scores entered into the scoring software. All teams and individuals were ranked for awardtrophies. Then, the top 16 individuals were selected and paired for the fast-paced countdownround competition in the afternoon.Grading might be the most stressful part of organizing the competition since the results had to betabulated before the afternoon countdown round and the award ceremony. The grading room wasusually tight on time and stressed for accuracy. Occasionally, coaches or parents questioned theresults and had to be verified or corrected at the end of the award ceremony.Shortly after 1pm, several hundred students, coaches and parents gathered in an auditorium. Thedean of College of Engineering usually kicked off the afternoon program by giving a welcomeremark. He offered a 10,000 scholarship to winners of the competition who choose to enroll inthe engineering program after graduating from high schools.Then, the MATHCOUNTS Coordinator took over by announcing the top 16 students whoqualified to compete at the countdown round. These students were paired like Sweet Sixteencollege basketball tournament and seated near the front.The countdown round was a fast-paced competition. In each paring, two students sat on the stagewith pencils and scratch paper. The Coordinator would read and show a problem on the bigscreen. The two students had 45 seconds to figure out the answer. Whoever buzzed in first hadthe chance to answer the question verbally. If his or her answer was correct, a point wasawarded. If the answer was incorrect, the other student had the remaining time to buzz in andanswer the question. The student who had more point(s) after 3 problems won the paring andmoved on to the next round.Soon, the 16 students shrunk down to 8, and then to 4. To determine the top four ranking of thecountdown round, the rule changed slightly. The winner must answer 3 problems correctly first.

For most people, the countdown round was easily the most intense and exciting part of thecompetition. It gave people a feeling of competing in a sport event, a different image from thesteroid type of nerdy students doing math. Many people, including students, parents, and coachesjoined MATHCOUNTS because of the excitement of the countdown round competition.Once the countdown round was over, the trophies were handed out to the top teams andindividuals. The students qualified to the state competition were announced. The tally sheetsshowing the school results were handed to the coaches. The competition usually ended around3pm.Service activities as part of engineering curriculumFor chapter competition, the Coordinator recruited around 50 engineering students, mostlyfreshmen, as volunteers to help the competition. More than half of them served as graders in asecure grading room. Others served as proctors. A handful helped to check in the competingstudents as they arrived in the morning.The most challenging task rested with the graders. Each year, they received training from thelead grader, a Coordinator from another chapter. The graders were divided into many teams oftwo so that the same paper could be graded twice to ensure accuracy. Occasionally, discrepancyoccurred and the two would verify and make corrections. Once the grading was completed andverified, the scores were recorded on a tally sheet and passed on to a designated grader forentering into the scoring software.Once all grading was completed, the tally sheets were examined to determine the top teams andindividuals. The results were verified with the rankings from the grading software. Sometimes,discrepancy occurred, and mistakes were corrected before finalizing the results. The entiregrading work had to be completed before the afternoon program.Our engineering students enjoyed the intense grading process. Many of them mentioned that theywere amazed at the math talents exhibited among the middle school students. Most of themacknowledged that they themselves were not be able to solve many of the math problems. Duringthe course of several hours, many graders developed emotional attachment to the students theywere grading and started to root for them as the results were tabulated on the whiteboard, a funexperience at the end of an intense grading process.Among the volunteers, proctors were the ones interacted with the competing middle schoolstudents. They followed the schedule, handed out the competition paper, read the rules ofcompetition, started the competition, collected paper once completed, and handed the paper tothe grading room. Our engineering students enjoyed this process by acting as “professors” givingout the “test” instead of taking one. The proctoring process also brought back memory of theirown experiences as middle school students several years ago.The chapter competition started in the morning by a handful of volunteers checking in thearriving students. They verified the spelling of the names and handed out the lunch tickets, t-

shirts, and other marketing materials. This part of the work usually completed within one hour.Many engineering students continued their service as graders or proctors so that they could earnmore service hours.In our chapter, the competition was conducted by three Coordinators, one as the lead grader inthe grading room, one responsible for training all volunteers, and one interfaced with thecoaches. During the coach meeting, the Coordinator encouraged more participation and handedout the participation certificates. The Coordinator also answered questions and addressedconcerns from the coaches of the participating schools.The volunteers were vital part of the competition. They were the ones that actually running thecompetition. In some chapters, the Coordinators were struggling to find enough people to serveas proctors and graders. Sometimes, they were short of volunteers and had to settle for parents tohelp. This was not an ideal situation since the parents could see information about their owncompeting kids. Remedies were made to minimize the potential breach of the competition rules,such as not allowing the parents to grade papers from schools of their own kids. Nevertheless,this was still not ideal since some parents knew the results before they were announced in theafternoon program and could pass to the students prematurely, even being told not to do so.In our chapter, we recruited adequate number of engineering students so that we neverencountered such issue. The main reason we were able to recruit adequate volunteers lied in theway we designed our engineering curriculum [5].To graduate from our engineering programs, all students were required to complete a one unitcourse called Engineering Service. In this course, there was no classroom meeting scheduled.Instead, each registered student needed to volunteer 30 hours of community services. Onceregistered, the students had two years to complete the course. Most students followed therecommendation and started this course during their first year in the engineering program.This course, and the graduation requirement, not only ushered students into various activitiesserving the community but also instilled some disciplines in students who needed to juggle theirbusy class schedule and the other activities. Students also reflected later that this course addedthe needed breaks for otherwise a brutal first year.Common engineering service activities our students engaged through this course included localcounty science fair, school district STEM events, tutoring to fellow students, and many others.However, the most popular service opportunity for most students was the annualMATHCOUNTS competition, simply due to the large number of students involved. It was alsothe most convenient one since it was on campus (travel not needed). For many students, findingopportunities and serving for 30 hours within two years presented a challenge. MATHCOUNTSadded a convenient option. The students only needed to work for half a day on a Saturday. Everyyear, once the MATHCOUNTS was announced, the 50 slots were filled within a week.

State MATHCOUNTS CompetitionDue to its success in hosting chapter competition, the state MATHCOUNTS governing boarddecided four years ago to move the state competition from its previous location (hosted since thebeginning and for more than 30 years) to this university. The state competition had been heldhere twice (switched to online in 2020 and 2021 due to the pandemic).The state competition presented some additional challenges. To accommodate more schools andstudents, a different venue was selected. The state competition was held inside the arena wherecollege basketball games were played. Instead of spreading in many classrooms, all competingstudents were seated together on the arena floor, with four at each table. A front area wasdesignated as the morning check in area and a secure space was allocated as the grading room.To ensure the state competition rules being followed, the Coordinator recruited around 100engineering students. Comparing with chapter competition, the processes of grading andmorning checking in remain the same, with slightly more volunteers involved. The vast majorityof the volunteers played the role of proctors, with one proctor at each table. Each year, about 50tables were setup on the arena floor to accommodate all competing schools and students. Inaddition to the proctors at the tables, additional 10 volunteers were assigned to delivercompetition materials to the tables at the beginning of each round and to the grading room at theend of each round.At the beginning of the afternoon program, the dean of College of Engineering usually gave awelcome remark and then introduced the speaker of the event. At the state MATHCOUNTS, auniversity professor was invited as the feature speaker. The speaker would talk about their ownresearch and its relationship to the middle school math. The easy-to-understand approach, thefascinating contents, and the connection of math to the real life applications were reallyinspiring. The speech was well received by the students, coaches, and parents. For the first year,a physics professor gave a talk on astronomy. For the second year, a female professor from theElectrical and Computer Engineering Department gave a talk and demo on robotics. The funinteraction between the professor and the robot really impressed the audience.Results and ImpactThe process of running the competitions improved over the years. After more than 10 years, wedeveloped a system to ensure the smooth success each time. The competition at our universitywas well regarded by the state governing board and by the MATHCOUNTS national office. Itwas considered one of the best run competitions.The competing middle school students liked this competition due to the venue. It was held at theheart of the beautiful university campus. The well-organized volunteers made it possible toconduct the competition smoothly. In addition, the students really enjoyed the lunch in theuniversity cafeteria.

For our engineering students, they had the chance to meet with the young and future engineeringstudents and played the “professor” roles for one day as proctors and graders. More importantly,they accumulated service hours towards their course completion.From the university point of view, this was an excellent marketing opportunity. We were able toinstill in the young mind the possibility of future engineering careers, and the possibility ofcoming to our university to pursue an engineering degree. We had anecdote facts showing thatsome of the previous competing students enrolled in our engineering programs. Some studentseven asked for and received the 10000 scholarship, as promised by the dean of the college.For some students, participating MATHCOUNTS was actually the very first time they set theirfeet in a university campus. For those 6th, 7th, and 8th graders, the first good impression would goa long way in shaping their mind. To accomplish this, we opened our labs for tour during thecompetition for coaches, parents, and siblings, and at the end of competition for the competingstudents. These labs included many of the research labs in the College of Engineering. Duringthe tour, people saw projects the college students involved, such as the SAE racing car, the 3Dprinting lab, the talking and moving robots, the solar photovoltaic and thermal lab, a largemachine shop, and other labs associated with individual engineering programs.Expansion to high school math competition AMC10 and AMC12After experiencing the fun and exciting MATHCOUNTS competition, the competing studentsmoved on to high school and became interested in and requested for the high school mathcompetitions. A few years after hosting MATHCOUNTS, the College of Engineering started tohost the AMC10 and AMC12 high school math competitions.AMC10 and AMC12 are the two high school math competitions organized annually by MAA(Mathematical Association of America [6]) whose history went all the way back to 1915. TheAMC10 is for grader 10 or younger and AMC12 opens to all students. Each year, over 300,000students around the world participated this challenge math competitions. During the annualFebruary contest, students have 75 minutes to solve 25 multiple choice math problems withoutcalculators. The top performers (top 2.5% for AMC10 and top 5% for AMC12) are invited backin March to participate the next round called AIME (American Invitational Math Exam). This isa 3-hour contest where students try to solve 15 challenge math problems. They are not multiplechoice problems. Instead, students need to figure out the answers and submit them in a specialformat (each answer is a three digit number from 000 to 999, inclusive).The students considered the invitation to participate AIME as a huge honor and a bigaccomplishment in math. The very best students who did well on AIME would then move on tothe next round called USAMO (United States of America Math Olympiad). The top performersof this round were invited to a summer camp for additional intensive training. Among them, thetop six students were selected each year to represent the country to compete at the annual IMO(International Math Olympiad [7]) competition. Historically, USA team had remarkableachievements and was placed the first place in the world numerous times.

Since 2012, the College of Engineering has been hosting this high school math competition forthe local high school students. The number of participating students was about half of thestudents in MATHCOUNTS. The completed competition paper was mailed to MAA for grading.Therefore, there was a delay in announcing the results. This was different from theMATHCOUNTS, where the paper was graded immediately. Therefore, theAMC10/AMC12/AIME contests lacked the excitement as we see in MATHCOUNTS.Nevertheless, students still loved it. It gave them a chance come back to the campus andcontinued to learn math through competition.Lessons learnedMany lessons learned over the years. We shall now outline the major ones that might beinteresting to our ASEE community.Schedule earlyMATHCOUNTS competition venues were always the highly sought-after facilities at theuniversity. To secure the venues, the Coordinator always sat down with the facility manager atthe beginning of each fall semester, six months prior to the competition, to nail down the dates ofcompetitions. We intentionally avoided busy weekend, such as homecoming or any anticipatedlarge university events. Once determined, the dates were secured and marked on the universitymaster calendar.FundraisingAll MATHCOUNTS competitions were organized by the volunteers and the funds needed to beraised to cover the cost. To manage this, we first reduced the cost to a bare minimum of studentlunch and award trophies only. The lunch price was negotiated with the university cafeteria to alower group rate.For fundraising, we reached out to the local branch offices of the professional engineeringsocieties, such as ASME (American Society of Mechanical Engineers), ASCE (AmericanSociety of Civil Engineers), and IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers) andreceived their support. In addition, a local utility company provided generous funds to cover allMATHCOUNTS competitions in its service area. The MATHCOUNTS national office alsoallocated some fund from the registration fees to support the local chapter and state competitions.For the shortfall, the College of Engineering usually stepped in to cover it as part of the outreachand marketing expenditure. In some years when we had surplus, we would purchase t-shirts forthe competition students.ParticipationOur chapter is located in an area where math competition performance was at or below the stateaverage based on the historical data (There had not been a student from the area that was rankedhigh enough to be qualified for the national MATHCOUNTS competition, as far as theCoordinator could recall). Participation was relatively low in comparing with other chapters. To

encourage participation, the Coordinator announced the upcoming competition early, soon aftersecuring the venue. In addition, the Coordinator kept communicating with the school coachesand answered their questions immediately.To get more participation, the Coordinator also emailed middle schools that were not aware ofMATHCOUNTS and invited them to try. Many schoolteachers were busy and sometimes forgotto register for their teams. When the deadline was near, a reminding email was sent. The lastminute registration requests were always accommodated. After the competition, the results werecommunicated to the coaches (and reminding them to come back next year). The participationcertificates with spelling errors were promptly corrected and mailed to the coaches.We had one coach who had participated for over ten years. Many years ago, she was planningnot to continue due to her busy schedule and taking care of her ailing relatives. To commemorateher dedication, a special trophy was awarded to her during the following year award ceremony.The Coordinator also encouraged her to stay on by soliciting parents’ help. A few years later, shefinally retired from her teaching job. Before her leaving, she trained another teacher and theschool’s participation never stopped and continued to this day.To further increase the participation, we also added an option called Unofficial. Those were theschools and the students didn’t register but wanted to have the experiences. They couldparticipate all activities without the eligibility of getting awards, participating the countdownround, and advancing to the state competition.An integral part of our engineering programBased on my experiences (as the Coordinator) in organizing the MATHCOUNTS competitionsin various chapters, many institutions treated this outreach program as something they have todo. Some of them viewed this as a distraction draining resources. They limited their involvementto open and close the venues and not much else. At our institution, hosting math competitions forlocal secondary schools had gradually become an integral part of our college operation. Wereceived strong support from the college and the university. Every year, our engineering studentslearned the opportunities from the announcement and quickly signed up for the serviceopportunities. Overtime, this became a part of our engineering program through our EngineeringService, a course required for graduation.In addition to the College of Engineering, other colleges of the university were also involvedindirectly. For example, during our first time hosting the state competition, we invited a physicsprofessor who gave a talk on astronomy. His easy to follow contents, impressive graphic imagesand videos, and the humorous presentation left a deep impression in those young minds about theexcit

MATHCOUNTS is an annual national math competition program aimed at enhancing problem solving skills for middle school students through a series of math competitions at the local, state, and national levels. Currently in its 38th year [1], MATHCOUNTS is one of the largest and most

Related Documents:

Web Hosting Control Panel cPanel Hosting refers to any web hosting plan that uses cPanel as its web hosting control panel. cPanel is the leading control panel interface in the web hosting industry today. It uses a graphical interface that greatly simplifies the management of a website. As such, we offer cPanel on each of our web hosting

Math 5/4, Math 6/5, Math 7/6, Math 8/7, and Algebra 1/2 Math 5/4, Math 6/5, Math 7/6, Math 8/7, and Algebra ½ form a series of courses to move students from primary grades to algebra. Each course contains a series of daily lessons covering all areas of general math. Each lesson

AGREEMENT. This Web Site Service Level Agreement (SLA) applies to a hosting. customer's hosting plans ("plans") if their account is current (i.e., not. past due) with Studio17 Web Hosting (Studio17). As used herein, the term "hosting customer" means the paying customer of Studio17 and person responsible for the upkeep of the hosting .

Service 1 (website hosting for 12 months) Item Notes Provide website hosting for the main LIVE website and for the development website. We have completely removed the burden of finding safe and reliable hosting by partnering with Rackspace - Europe's premier hosting provider. We are already providing hosting

Practice Test Scoring Guide-Grade 7 Math Fall 2019 3 Grade 7 Math Practice Test Item Number 1 . (1 Point) The student selected a correct cross section. Practice Test Scoring Guide-Grade 7 Math Fall 2019 10 Item Number 8 . Practice Test Scoring Guide-Grade 7 Math Fall 2019 11 Item Number 9 . Practice Test Scoring Guide-Grade 7 Math Fall 2019 12 Item Number (1 Point) Student selected the .

MATH 110 College Algebra MATH 100 prepares students for MATH 103, and MATH 103 prepares students for MATH 110. To fulfil undergraduate General Education Core requirements, students must successfully complete either MATH 103 or the higher level MATH 110. Some academic programs, such as the BS in Business Administration, require MATH 110.

math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com math-drills.com Making Number Patterns (C) I

2016 MCAS Results September 29, 2016 Page 4 8 Year Math CPI Results For State, District, and Schools Ranked by 2016 CPI School el 2009 Math MCAS 2010 Math MCAS 2011 Math MCAS 2012 Math MCAS 2013 Math MCAS 2014 Math MCAS 2015 Math MCAS 2016 Math PARCC Sewell-Anderson 1 80.0 78.7 76.7 84.2 88.3 89.0 89.3 92.5