Classical Music Consumer Segmentation Study

1y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
1.33 MB
128 Pages
Last View : 28d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Maleah Dent
Transcription

Classical Music ConsumerSegmentation StudyHow Americans Relate to Classical Musicand Their Local OrchestrasCommissioned by 15 American Orchestrasand the John S. and James L. Knight FoundationINSIDE THEC U LT U R A LConsumer’s Mind

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportFINAL REPORTClassical Music ConsumerSegmentation StudyHow Americans Relate to Classical Music and Their LocalOrchestrasOctober 2002Commissioned by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundationand 15 American Orchestras:Brooklyn Philharmonic OrchestraCharlotte Symphony OrchestraColorado Symphony AssociationDetroit Symphony Orchestra HallFort Wayne Philharmonic OrchestraKansas City SymphonyLong Beach Symphony AssociationLouisiana Philharmonic OrchestraNew World SymphonyOregon Symphony AssociationThe Philadelphia Orchestra AssociationSaint Louis Symphony OrchestraSaint Paul Chamber OrchestraSymphony Society of San AntonioWichita Symphony Society 2002 Audience Insight LLCPage 1

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportABOUTThe StudyAbstractOrchestras are adrift in a sea of classical music consumers who rarely, if ever, attendlive orchestra concerts. With more than 25,000 interviews with potential classicalconsumers and orchestra ticket buyers in 15 cities, the Classical Music ConsumerSegmentation Study offers a sweeping view of an art form in transition and anorchestra field increasingly detached from its potential customers.The study paints a detailed picture of how consumers fit classical music into theirlives — listening to classical radio and recordings in their automobiles and homes,and attending live concerts in churches, schools and traditional concert venues.Roughly 10 percent to 15 percent of Americans have what might be termed a closeor moderately close relationship with classical music, and again as many haveweaker ties. Across the 15 study cities, approximately one if four adults areprospects (i.e., potential orchestra ticket buyers). But only half of those who expressthe very highest levels of preference for attending classical music concerts actuallyattend, even infrequently.On a tactical level, the study produced a long list of ideas for new and refinedmarketing strategies. Subscription marketing, the study suggests, is an increasinglydysfunctional marketing paradigm that is often at odds with the goal of attractingyounger audiences. From a strategic standpoint, increasing attendance — or at leaststaving off a decline in attendance — may require a loosening of the definitionalboundaries around “classical music” and structural changes to the concert experiencethat recognize the underlying values and benefits that consumers seek fromlistening to classical music and attending live concerts.Study TeamAudience Insight LLCP.O. Box 423, Southport, Conn. 06890Telephone 203-256-1616Email: info@audienceinsight.comAlan S. Brown, Project DirectorSteven A. Wolff, PrincipalAndrew J. Fish, PhD, Research DirectorMary Beth Fenlaw, Project ManagerChris Lorway, AnalystErik Swenson, AnalystAudience Insight is the research affiliate of AMS Planning & Research Corp.Page 2

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe consultants are grateful to entire study team for their support andencouragement throughout the study.Knight Foundation Staff Penelope McPhee, Vice President and Chief Program OfficerLarry Meyer, Vice President of CommunicationsLisa Versaci, Director of National Venture FundJohn Bare, Director of Program Development and EvaluationGary Burger, former Arts & Culture Program DirectorExpert PanelistsTwo marketing experts assisted the study team in formulating the research plan: Joanne Scheff, Adjunct Associate Professor of Arts Management, J.L. KelloggGraduate School of Management, Northwestern University, and Principal, JoanneScheff Arts Management John H. Mather, Professor of Marketing, Graduate School of IndustrialAdministration, Carnegie Mellon UniversityStudy Advisory GroupThe Study Advisory Committee provided guidance and feedback to the study teamwith the overall goal of keeping the study relevant to the day-to-day issues andchallenges facing orchestras. The group included administrators, board membersand a musician. Ed Cambron, Dir. of Marketing and Patron Services, Philadelphia OrchestraJulia Kirchhausen, Former Dir. of Marketing, St. Paul Chamber OrchestraDon Roth, Past President and Executive Director, St. Louis Symphony OrchestraChristopher Stager, Former Dir. of Marketing, Brooklyn Philharmonic OrchestraDavid Tang, Associate Conductor, Charlotte Symphony OrchestraOur heartfelt thanks go to each of the current and former staff members of the 15orchestras whose assistance and cooperation made the study possible. We areespecially indebted to the Charlotte Symphony Orchestra for serving as the test sitefor the various methodologies.Page 3

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportTA B L E O FContentsIntroduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Key Themes And Observations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Research Goals & Methodologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Research Goals & Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21The Central Hypothesis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21Methodologies & Data Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24Towards A New Model Of Classical Consumers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29Classical Music Prospects And Market Potential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30Segmentation Strategy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33Defining A Pool Of Potential Classical Consumers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35Demographics Of Classical Music Consumer Groups. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37Unactualized Affinity — The Other Half Of The Glass . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39How Consumers Relate To Classical Music . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Types Of Classical Concerts Attended . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41Venues Used For Live Concerts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44Consumption Of Classical Music Via Electronic Media . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45Attitudes About Classical Music . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52Segmentation Model: Art Form Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60How Consumers Relate To Their Local Orchestra . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73Social Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83Initiators And Responders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86Other Results — Local Orchestra Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92Segmentation Model: Local Orchestra Relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95The Prospect Universe For 15 Orchestras . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99The Prospect Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100Segment Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105Consumer Behaviors And Arts Attendance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115Values And Benefits Of Classical Music . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123Report Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-1Research Goals And Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-2Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-6Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-15Focus Group Summary Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-44Data Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A-85Page 4

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportINTRODUCTIONMagic of Music has been one of the major funding initiatives of the KnightFoundation since 1994. In its first phase, nearly 6 million in grants was awardedto a select group of 12 orchestras with the overall goal of strengthening the bondbetween musicians and audiences in the concert hall. A number of innovativeprograms were designed and tested, ranging from informal performances at unusuallocations to abbreviated programs and “informances” as entry points for new andyounger audiences.Knight Foundation’s trustees funded a second phase for Magic of Music inDecember 1999, involving 15 orchestras. In addition to further work in the areas ofprogram innovation and audience development, the second phase included asignificant investment in market research. Each orchestra was required to participatein the research project in order to be eligible for a program grant.All 15 orchestras applied to participate in the research initiative, and all weregranted a share of the funds necessary to participate. Each orchestra contractedseparately with Audience Insight LLC to conduct a standardized program ofmarket-specific research.To begin the research initiative and to set the stage for the local studies, KnightFoundation contracted with Audience Insight to conduct a national study ofclassical music consumers, which included both qualitative and quantitativecomponents.The study is unique in scope, focus and design. More than 11,300 random sampletelephone interviews were fielded in 15 markets corresponding to the areas servedby the 15 orchestras (approximately 750 interviews in each market). The localsurveys were preceded by a national telephone survey of 2,200 adults. In addition,1,500 orchestra ticket buyers were surveyed by mail in each market (750subscribers and 750 single-ticket buyers, each), yielding just over 10,000 responses.At the end of the two-year study the 15 orchestras were able to compare nationalresults with market-area results and results for their own ticket buyers — along awide range of variables relating to classical music participation.Thanks to a combination of resources from Knight Foundation, the orchestras and abroad array of professional expertise in marketing, market research and consumerbehavior, this initiative represents the most comprehensive discipline-specificaudience study ever undertaken in the United States.Page 5

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportKEY THEMESAnd Observations“Sometimes I think that people who know too much don’t enjoy things becausethey’re looking for the mistakes and they’re honing in on that so hard that theydon’t relax and enjoy what’s going on.” — Focus Group Participant, November2000Orchestras are adrift in a sea of classical music consumers who rarely, if ever, attendlive orchestra concerts. Roughly 10 percent to 15 percent of Americans have whatmight be termed a close or moderately close relationship with classical music, andagain as many have weaker ties. Yet only half of those who express the very highestlevels of preference for attending classical music concerts actually attend, eveninfrequently.Results from the Classical Music Consumer Segmentation Study paint a detailedpicture of how people fit classical music into their lives and offer a sweeping view ofan art form in transition and an orchestra field increasingly detachedfrom its potential customers.Radio is the dominantAs part of its Magic of Music initiative, the John S. and James L.mode of consumptionKnight Foundation commissioned the Classical Music Consumerof classical music,Segmentation Study in 2000, inviting its 15 U.S. orchestra partnersto join the research. The study involved a national telephone surveyfollowed by recordingsas well as a series of comparable research efforts in each of the 15orchestras’ communities. In each market, data gathering included anand then live concerts.analysis of the orchestra’s customer data file, a general populationtelephone survey of 750 adults, and a postal survey of orchestraticket buyers. Additionally, focus group discussions were held with various groupsof prospects and ticket buyers in Charlotte, St. Paul and Detroit. At the conclusionof the study, the consultants traveled to each city to present and discuss the researchresults with board and staff members of each orchestra.Altogether, the Classical Music Consumer Segmentation Study represents thatlargest discipline-specific arts consumer study ever undertaken in the U.S., withnearly 25,000 completed interviews and surveys.11The data are public available and may be accessed through the electronic catalog of the Universityof North Carolina’s Odum Institute for Research in Social Science at www.irss.unc.edu. 2002 Audience Insight LLCPage 7

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportConnections to Classical MusicConsumers experience classical music — both live and recorded — in a variety ofsettings and venues. Nationally, the most common setting for experiencing the artform is the automobile, followed by the home. Live classical concerts, includingchamber music concerts, recitals, choral concerts as well as orchestra concerts, areheard in a range of formal and informal settings. In addition to formal concertvenues, consumers attend classical concerts in schools, houses of worship, outdooramphitheatres and private homes.Radio is the dominant mode of consumption of classical music, followed byrecordings and then live concerts. Six in 10 orchestra ticket buyers listen to classicalmusic on the radio daily or several times a week. The typical orchestra subscriberowns 105 records, tapes and CDs, compared to 63 for single-ticket buyers. Whilesome consumers think of classical radio programming as a substitute for liveconcerts (particularly those with modest levels of knowledge about classical music),most do not. Generally, classical consumers sustain and enhance their interest in theart form through radio and recordings.The study reveals a symbiotic, long-term relationship between live attendance andconsumption via electronic media. If listening to classical radio and recordings athome and in the car is how consumers grow and sustain a love for classical music,then these are primary arenas for long-term audience development. Increasing theavailability and quality of classical music on the radio, and increasing ownership,exchange and use classical recordings is strategic to the long-term vitality of theorchestra field.Attitudes and Self-PerceptionsThe vast majorityof potential customersfor orchestras arecasually involved withthe art form.In addition to consumption patterns, the study also investigated attitudes aboutclassical music, including self-reported knowledge levels and levels of interest inlearning more. Nationally, just 6 percent of the large base of potential classicalconsumers2 self-identified as being “very knowledgeable” about classical music, while44 percent said that they are “somewhat knowledgeable.” Similarly, 13 percent ofpotential classical consumers reported that they are “very interested” in learning moreabout classical music, while 53 percent said that they are “somewhat interested.”Overall, just 10 percent of potential classical consumers think of themselves as“critical listeners” (self-defined), while 78 percent consider themselves “casuallisteners” and 11 percent say that they are “uninterested listeners.” Thus, the vastmajority of potential customers for orchestras are casually involved with the art form.2Page 8Potential classical consumers were defined as a subset of adults who qualified for a lengthierinterview based on their responses to an initial series of questions about arts activities. In thenational study, 59 percent of adults qualified as potential classical consumers. In the 15 localstudies, 52 percent qualified as potential classical consumers, on average.

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal Report“Casual listeners” also dominate the audience base. Across the 15 orchestras, 42percent of subscribers think of themselves as “critical listeners,” while 57 percentsay that they are “casual listeners.” For single-ticket buyers, the figures are 28percent for “critical listeners” and 68 percent for “casual listeners.”On balance, the study finds a range of sophistication levels in the audience and theprospect base. While most everyone understands this intuitively, the study providesnew insight, clarification and impetus for action. What does it mean to an orchestrathat a third of its ticket buyers are more sophisticated about classical music andtwo-thirds are less sophisticated about classical music, by their own definitions? If amajority of ticket buyers have a limited classical music vocabulary and don’t knowenough to select programs based on artists and repertoire, then on what basis arethey making decisions?Connections to the Local OrchestraThe study illustrates the broad impact that some orchestras have had in theircommunities, and it exposes large numbers of classical enthusiasts in each of the 15cities. The Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra, for example, has touched a third ofadults in the St. Louis area, on a cumulative basis. Similarly, the Wichita SymphonyOrchestra, Fort Wayne Philharmonic, Detroit Symphony Orchestra and OregonSymphony have reached at least a quarter of adults in their respective markets, on acumulative basis.By any measure, these are impressive figures. They also point to the factthat orchestras have accumulated large numbers of inactive, formerbuyers — people who have attended a concert at some point in theirlives but who do not attend now with any regularity.On average, 22 percent of potential classical consumers say that they are“very interested” in attending a concert by their local orchestra, while71 percent say that they are “open to attending, but it’s not a highpriority.” That’s a lot of wishful thinking but nevertheless a very rawmeasure of interest.On a cumulativebasis, the Saint LouisSymphony Orchestrahas touched a thirdof adults in itsmarket area.The study produced a large amount of data on respondents’ frequency ofattendance at all live performing arts events, frequency of attendance at classicalmusic concerts, and frequency of attendance at concerts by a specific local orchestra.On average, orchestra subscribers in the 15 cities reported that classical musicaccounts for 58 percent of their total “diet” of performing arts activities, comparedto 41 percent for single-ticket buyers. The average Brooklyn Philharmonicsubscriber attended 31 performing arts events over the preceding year, while theaverage Charlotte Symphony subscriber attended 15.Within the realm of classical music, individual orchestras account for the lion’sshare of their ticket buyers’ concert-going activity, but not all of it. In cities likePage 9

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportCharlotte and Fort Wayne, the orchestras supply upwards of 80 percent of all of thelive classical concerts that their ticket buyers attend in a given year. The Saint PaulChamber Orchestra, in contrast, accounts for just 41 percent of its single-ticketbuyers’ concert-going activity.3While most orchestras use similar, if not identical marketing strategies andtactics — relying heavily on subscription marketing as the primary means ofselling tickets — ticket buyers in these cities experience their orchestras quitedifferently. Single-ticket buyers to the Brooklyn Philharmonic could not lookmore different than single-ticket buyers to the Fort Wayne Philharmonic, interms of sophistication, experience level and frequency of attendance, yet themarketing tactics used to attract them are strikingly similar.Social ContextThe power of social context in driving orchestra attendance and arts attendance,generally, is a major theme of the study. Nationally, six in 10 potential classicalconsumers have close friends or immediate family members who attend classicalconcerts. This compares to eight in 10 orchestra ticket buyers.On average,40 percent of thosewho’ve ever attendeda concert by theirlocal orchestra didnot (and have never)purchased a ticket.Different people like different amounts of social activity before, during and afterconcerts. For some, the social opportunity itself is what triggers consent to attend.An attractive social context, from a consumer behavior perspective, lubricates thepurchase decision process.A serious examination of the large base of potential classical consumers reveals thatfor many, if not most, a relationship with the orchestra is contingent on an externalsocial stimulus — an invitation. Across the 15 markets, 16 percent of potentialclassical consumers self-identify as “Initiators” — people who instinctively organizecultural outings for their friends, but 52 percent identify themselves as“Responders” — people who are much more likely to attend cultural outings ifsomeone else invites them.Indeed, the study paints a picture of a largely invisible “shadow audience” for mostorchestras — people who’ve attended concerts but who did not buy their ticket andmay not have participated in the purchase decision process. Results from the publictelephone surveys in each of the 15 markets indicate that, on average, 40 percent ofthose who’ve ever attended a concert by their local orchestra did not (and havenever) purchased a ticket.3Page 10The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra, Brooklyn Philharmonic, New World Symphony and LongBeach Philharmonic all operate in markets with other major orchestras. Results of the ticket buyersurveys are orchestra-specific and are not representative of other orchestras’ ticket buyers.

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportFocus group research suggests that the absence of social context is a major barrier toattendance. Consider a married couple with divergent musical tastes; one likesclassical music and the other doesn’t — a phenomenon we call “taste dissonance.”Or, consider a single person who is new to an area and has yet to develop a socialnetwork with shared values about concert going. In both cases, the potentialdemand for classical concerts remains latent without a social context for attending.Orchestras and other arts groups spend a great deal of time and money trying toconvert Responders into active buyers. The data suggest, however, that indirectselling to Responders (through their respective Initiators) might be more effectivein activating their interest in classical music, and other marketing strategies thatleverage the potent currency of social context are likely to unlock additionaldemand for arts programs.All of this raises an urgent question for orchestras: What defines the customer? Is acustomer someone who buys tickets, or is a customer someone who enjoys theconcert? The difference is important. If the definition of “customer” is expanded toinclude people who enjoy concerts but won’t attend without an invitation, then afundamental realignment of marketing strategy is implied — a shift towardstrategies that create and facilitate attendance in small social groups.The Prospect Universe for 15 OrchestrasCluster analysis was employed to create two new consumer models— a model that reflects the range of relationships that people havewith classical music and another model that reflects the range ofconnections that consumers have with a specific local orchestra. Atthe end of the study, the two models were merged to create a third“orchestra prospect model” that represents a new framework forunderstanding both current and prospective audiences.All told, the prospectuniverse for the 15orchestras, on average,is 27 percent of adults.On average, the 15 orchestras attract roughly 4 percent of adults in theircommunities on any sort of a regular basis — they are “Captured Prospects.” Acrossthe 15 markets studied, another 15 percent of adults, on average, are “LowFrequency Alumni” of the orchestra, and another 8 percent are “UninitiatedProspects” — people with a close art-form relationship who have never attended aconcert by the local orchestra included in the study. All told, the prospect universefor the 15 orchestras, on average, is 27 percent of adults. The figure ranges from alow of 16 percent (Brooklyn Philharmonic, New World Symphony) to a high of 35percent (Wichita Symphony Orchestra, Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra).Not all of these people, of course, are ready to subscribe or buy single tickets toorchestra concerts. But they all share one of two important characteristics: eitherthey have already been to a concert by the local orchestra at some point in theirlives, or their level of interest in classical music is high enough that they must beconsidered to be prospects in the eyes of the local orchestra.Page 11

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal ReportDifficult Questions, Difficult AnswersTwo-thirds of Americans would accept a free ticket to a classical concert by asymphony orchestra, if offered by a friend or family member. So, why are someorchestras having difficulty filling their halls? What’s keeping orchestras fromattracting the next 2 percent or 3 percent of adults in their communities? Amongothers, these are some of the most difficult questions addressed in the study.Can better marketing renew the constituency for classical music?When pressed, some orchestra managers acknowledge that more and bettermarketing is only part of the answer to declining attendance. This study produced along list of ideas for new and refined marketing tactics — including concert clubs(much like book clubs), thematic packaging, more clever sales messages, broadbased prospect campaigns, low-threshold trial experiences, cooperative marketingwith other arts groups, and many other ideas that deserve to be tested andevaluated.The study also raised questions about mission and strategy. Subscription marketingis a conundrum for orchestras and an increasingly dysfunctional marketingparadigm. While a great number of classical music lovers enjoy subscribing, only 8percent of potential classical consumers are highly inclined to subscribe. This isespecially true for younger people who attend orchestra concerts. Among ticketbuyers in the 18-34 age cohort, 15 percent are highly inclined to subscribe,compared to 56 percent of those aged 75 and older.Subscription campaigns generate the cash flow and sales volume that orchestras needto survive and are efficient from a marketing standpoint (i.e., a relatively lowmarketing cost-per-ticket). Single-ticket marketing, in contrast, is expensive on acost-per-ticket-sold basis. Orchestra marketers do their job well by selling out onsubscription and are rewarded for doing so.Only 8 percent ofpotential classicalconsumers are highlyinclined to subscribe.Notwithstanding the benefits of subscription marketing, this study brings to lighttwo of its major flaws. First, subscription marketing acts as a filter on an orchestra’sconstituency that runs counter to the goal of attracting younger audiences. Abouthalf of subscribers across the 15 markets are 65 or older, and 17 percent are 75 orolder. Subscribers are almost twice as likely as single-ticket buyers to be retired (45percent vs. 24 percent, respectively) and are significantly more likely as single-ticketbuyers to have incomes above 150,000 (25 percent vs. 16 percent, respectively).Moreover, subscribers are half as likely as single-ticket buyers to have children inthe household (12 percent vs. 23 percent, respectively).The other major problem with subscription marketing is that the lion’s share ofprospects for these orchestras — including many of those who are highlyknowledgeable about classical music — are simply not interested in makingsubscription commitments. Less than 10 percent of “Uninitiated Prospects” arePage 12

Classical Music Consumer Segmentation StudyFinal Reporthighly inclined to subscribe. Within the base of single-ticket buyers, 36 percent areformer subscribers who have opted out of subscription packaging but who remain inthe audience.We do not suggest that there is anything conceptually flawed with subscriptionpackaging or that orchestras summarily abandon subscription marketing. What thestudy does illustrate, very clearly, is that subscription marketing comes at a priceand that trade-offs are being made that are not always consistent with some of theorchestras’ own goals or the larger ideals for community cultural involvementespoused by funders.In the marketing area, perhaps the biggest challenge facing the orchestra field isdefining other customer relationships or “involvement opportunities” that do notrequire advance commitment or large, lump sum payments — and then findingnew ways to build loyalty among single-ticket buyers, even those who may attendjust two or three times a year. There are no easy answers here, but the study pointsto many ideas. Perhaps, with the advent of e-mail marketing, we are actuallyapproaching a time when the cost of selling a single ticket is not tenor twenty times the cost of selling a subscription seat.Orchestras are constrained by a financial model that is largelydependent on subscription sales. There is little room to experiment— no “R&D” capacity, like other industries — and even less roomto fail. Until this equation fundamentally changes, subscriptionmarketing will continue to be the sweet honey that sustainsorchestras and a slow-acting poison that impedes their long-termsustainability.A much more difficult, complex and strategic proposition — andthe larger part of the answer to declining attendance — is what todo differently onstage.Each of the 15orchestras drawsabout 80 percent of i

Consumers experience classical music — both live and recorded — in a variety of settings and venues. Nationally, the most common setting for experiencing the art form is the automobile, followed by the home. Live classical concerts, including chamber music concerts, recitals, choral concerts as well as orchestra concerts, are

Related Documents:

Classical Music Perspective Classical music usually refers to music that was written in the Classical music period, which lasted from about 1750 to 1825. There usually is a misconception about this fact. In general, people refer to music from all periods of music history as classical music. However, other musical periods do exist, and they .

Internal Segmentation Firewall Segmentation is not new, but effective segmentation has not been practical. In the past, performance, price, and effort were all gating factors for implementing a good segmentation strategy. But this has not changed the desire for deeper and more prolific segmentation in the enterprise.

Internal Segmentation Firewall Segmentation is not new, but effective segmentation has not been practical. In the past, performance, price, and effort were all gating factors for implementing a good segmentation strategy. But this has not changed the desire for deeper and more prolific segmentation in the enterprise.

segmentation research. 2. Method The method of segmentation refers to when the segments are defined. There are two methods of segmentation. They are a priori and post hoc. Segmentation requires that respondents be grouped based on some set of variables that are identified before data collection. In a priori segmentation, not only are the

Fig. 1.Overview. First stage: Coarse segmentation with multi-organ segmentation withweighted-FCN, where we obtain the segmentation results and probability map for eachorgan. Second stage: Fine-scaled binary segmentation per organ. The input consists of cropped volume and a probability map from coarse segmentation.

needs-based consumer centric market segmentation model for Australian sports participants (players) and non-sports participants (non-players). In line with the changing consumer preferences, the Market Segmentation Study (the Study) identifi ed that sports will need to adapt their offerings if they are to stay relevant to the Australian consumer.

Methods of image segmentation become more and more important in the field of remote sensing image analysis - in particular due to . The most important factor for using segmentation techniques is segmentation quality. Thus, a method for evaluating segmentation quality is presented and used to compare results of presently available .

The Adventures of Tom Sawyer ADVANCED PLACEMENT TEACHING UNIT OBJECTIVES The Adventures of Tom Sawyer Objectives By the end of this Unit, the student will be able to: 1. identify the conventions of satire. 2. examine theories of humor. 3. analyze the narrative arc including character development, setting, plot, conflict, exposition, narrative persona, and point of view. 4. identify and analyze .