Investor Perceptions And Preferences Toward Selected Stock . - AARP

1y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
677.65 KB
61 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Abram Andresen
Transcription

Investor Perceptions and PreferencesToward Selected Stock MarketConditions and Practices:An AARP Survey of Stock OwnersAges 50 and OlderFull ReportPublished March 2004

Investor Perceptions and Preferences TowardSelected Stock Market Conditions and Practices:An AARP Survey of Stock Owners Ages 50 and OlderFull ReportData Collected by Knowledge NetworksReport Prepared by S. Kathi BrownCopyright 2004AARPKnowledge Management601 E Street, NWWashington, DC 20049http://research.aarp.orgReprinting with Permission

AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan membership organization dedicated to making life better forpeople 50 and over. We provide information and resources; engage in legislative, regulatory andlegal advocacy; assist members in serving their communities; and offer a wide range of uniquebenefits, special products, and services for our members. These include AARP The Magazine,published bimonthly; AARP Bulletin, our monthly newspaper; AARP Segunda Juventud, ourquarterly newspaper in Spanish; NRTA Live and Learn, our quarterly newsletter for 50 educators; and our Web site, www.aarp.org. We have staffed offices in all 50 states, the Districtof Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.AcknowledgementsKnowledge Networks, of Menlo Park, California, collected the data for this study through itsweb-enabled panel. This report was prepared by S. Kathi Brown, Strategic Issues Research,AARP Knowledge Management. Jeff Love and Teresa Keenan reviewed this report. Foradditional information, contact S. Kathi Brown at (202) 434-6296 or Jeff Love at (202) 4346279.

CONTENTSI. Executive Summary.3II. Introduction .6III. Detailed Findings .8Appendix A: Methodology .43Appendix B: Annotated Questionnaire.441

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK2

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThis survey of 50 to 70 year old investors was conducted in order to examine perceptions ofselected securities industry practices, the stock market, and financial services professionals. Thesurvey illustrates that most investors feel that the cost-related issues of price per share and feesare more important in stock transactions than are other issues such as speed of transaction.Findings also reveal widespread concerns among investors related to dishonesty in the securitiesindustry, lack of ethics, lack of accountability, and lack of consumer protection, suggesting thatmuch remains to be done to restore investor confidence.Best Available Price vs. SpeedWhen presented with two opposing views related to the importance of obtaining the bestavailable stock price versus the importance of other issues such as speed of transaction,approximately two-thirds (66%) of respondents indicated that they agreed with the view statingthat best available price should be the top priority when conducting transactions.Best Available Price vs. Speed(n 1,917)View A: Best available price shouldbe top priority.View B: Important to balance need forprice with speed and other issues.Refused to answer66%31%3%When asked how strongly they agreed with their selection, close to three in four (74%)respondents indicated that they somewhat agreed. Approximately one in four (26%) indicatedthat they strongly agreed. Those who felt that best price should be the top priority (“View A”supporters) and those who felt that the need for best price should be balanced with speed andother issues (“View B” supporters) were equally likely to indicate that they strongly agreed withtheir respective viewpoints. Specifically, among View A supporters, 74 percent indicated thatthey somewhat agreed with View A, while only 26 percent indicated that they strongly agreed.Similarly, among View B supporters, 74 percent indicated that they somewhat agreed with ViewB, while only 26 percent strongly agreed with View B.When those respondents who selected View A were asked if there were any circumstances underwhich best available price would not be their highest priority, almost half (48%) said that bestavailable price would not be their top priority if obtaining the best price meant that they wouldhave to pay high fees. Another 41 percent pointed to the need to conduct transactions quickly.Close to one in six (17%) reported that best available price would always be their highestpriority.Of all respondents, more than eight in ten (86%) agreed that their stock broker or mutual fundmanager should notify them before completing a transaction in which best available price is notthe top priority.3

Important Considerations When Investing in Mutual Funds or Individual StocksWhen respondents were asked to rate the importance of price, fees, speed, and confidentiality,the cost-related issues of price and fees received significantly more very important ratings thandid speed and confidentiality. Between 70 percent and 80 percent of respondents perceivedprice and fees to be very important in both mutual fund transactions and individual stocktransactions. Approximately 60 percent perceived confidentiality to be very important, whilefewer than 30 percent perceived speed to be very important.Confidence in Financial Services ProfessionalsThe majority of respondents (74%) reported that they prefer to have others manage theirinvestments for them, although they do like to be involved in major investment decisions. Infact, close to two in three (66%) indicated that they rely on either a personal broker/financialadvisor, an employer-sponsored broker/financial advisor, or a banker when making investmentdecisions.While investor reliance on financial services professionals may stem in part from a desire toreduce demands on their own time, most investors appear to lack confidence in their ability toconduct trades and make investment decisions without the assistance of financial servicesprofessionals. Specifically, close to three in four respondents (72-76%) have more confidence inthe abilities of mutual fund managers or stock brokers to conduct transactions for them than theyhave in their own abilities to conduct transactions. In contrast, only one in three (33%) areconfident in their ability to buy and sell individual stocks without the assistance of stock brokers.Interestingly, although subsequent sections of this report reveal widespread concerns about thesecurities industry on issues such as a lack of ethics and a lack of accountability, mostrespondents (76%) indicate that they are at least somewhat confident that “the financialinstitutions that handle my money manage my accounts according to what is in my best interest.”This apparent contradiction may reflect differences in interpretations of the terms “financialinstitutions” and “securities industry” as it is likely that the term “securities industry” brings tomind entities, such as brokerage firms, mutual fund firms, and stock exchanges, whose primaryfunctions involve trading stocks. In contrast, it’s likely that respondents interpret “financialinstitutions” more broadly to include banks, which are likely to be perceived as separate from thesecurities industry. Yet another possibility is that respondents are more confident about theirown banks and investment firms than they are about the industry as a whole, which maycontribute to this relatively high level of confidence in institutions that “handle my money.”Concerns and Worries About the Stock MarketFear of losing money (63%), lack of ethics (61%), and general concerns about the state of theeconomy (55%) top the list of respondent concerns about the stock market. More than half ofrespondents selected these items when asked to select from a list of eight possible concerns. Incontrast, fewer than one in three (29%) are concerned about the impact of future terrorist attackson the stock market.4

Problems for the Securities IndustryDishonesty (62%), lack of accountability (62%), and lack of consumer protection and means ofrecourse for harmed investors (60%) are those issues that respondents are most likely to view as“big problems” for the industry. More than half also view insider trading (57%) and lack ofinternal controls and checks (52%) as “big problems.”Need for Changes in RegulationsOf all respondents, close to eight in ten (78%) feel that the regulation of the securities industryshould be stronger than it is today. One in three (33%) feel that it should be much stronger,while 45 percent feel that it should be somewhat stronger. Only one percent feel that it shouldbe looser. Approximately one in five (21%) report that they don’t know whether regulation ofthe industry should be stronger or looser than it is today.ConclusionsFor most individuals interested in investing, the ability to deal with the complexity of andchoices in the equity markets begins with the challenge of determining which analysts,brokerage, mutual fund or account management firms to trust, and is followed by the challengeof interpreting and assessing investment quality rating systems that they use. What investorsexpect from those who present themselves, or whose firms present themselves, as professionalmarket analysts is not perfection, but a fair rating of the trade-offs and risks being assumed.The comprehensiveness as well as the jurisdictional range of inquiries made by Congressionalcommittees over the last four years, is testimony to the seriousness of the risk posed to – untilrecently -- an undervalued national asset. That asset has been the trust of potential as well asactive individual investors in the public structures and processes to assure and re-assure them ofthe openness and fairness of our equity markets. At a time when individual investor confidencehas been deeply shaken, the investing public is looking to Congress, and the federal and statesecurities regulators, for genuine reform – not merely a shift in which exchanges or marketagents will benefit - to underwrite and renew its trust in the fairness of our markets.The ultimate purpose of our system of investor protections is not to eliminate investment risk,but rather to fairly characterize and inform the risk takers of its nature and condition. The barhas been raised and the scope expanded for substantial trading system reform. A sustainedmarket recovery will be validated only with the return of confidence by individual investors,justified through reform of the market’s principal institutions and agents. In the final analysis,timely access to quality information is critical to bringing discipline to corporate, mutual fund,pension account performance as well as to assuring proper governance and effective investorprotection.5

II. INTRODUCTIONIn recent years, stock market investors have weathered a sluggish economy, the steep marketdeclines prompted by the September 11th terrorist attacks, trade deficits, and reports of numerousscandals ranging from illegal corporate accounting practices to insider trading. According to ananalysis of the Federal Reserve Board’s 1998 and 2001 Surveys of Consumer Finances, the stockmarket declines of 2000 and 2001 reversed gains posted earlier, and by the end of 2001, mostmajor indexes had nearly returned to their 1998 levels. 1 Moreover, in a survey conducted byAARP in December 2002, three in four investors between the ages of 50 and 70 reported losingmoney in stocks during the preceding two years, and the majority of those who lost moneyindicated that they had adjusted their work plans, lifestyles, or expectations of retirement as aresult of their losses.2However, the proportion of families that own corporate equities either directly or indirectly (suchas through mutual funds or retirement accounts) rose from 1998 to 2001. By 2001, theproportion surpassed 50 percent. The growth in the value of equity holdings helped increasefinancial assets as a share of total family assets despite a decline in the overall stock market thatbegin in the second half of 2000.Today’s investor participates in an increasingly complicated world that co-mingles personalfinance with the factors and forces of global capital markets. Many individuals own stocksthrough more than one method. The four primary means by which individuals may own stocksare as follows: Directly own shares in publicly traded companies; Own shares in equity mutual funds outside of retirement saving plans and pensionaccounts; Own equity through self-directed retirement plans such as IRAs or Keogh plans; Own equity through corporate retirement savings plans such as defined contributionplans.As stock ownership becomes more commonplace among U.S. households, this most recentsurvey of stock owners was conducted to examine investor perceptions of selected securitiesindustry practices, the stock market, and financial services professionals in light of thepreviously mentioned challenges of the last few years. This survey focuses on investors ages 50and older and their valuation of investor protection first principles and investment prioritiesduring a period of market turbulence and reform.1See: Aizcorbe, Kennickell & Moore, “Recent Changes in U.S. Family Finances,” Federal Reserve Bulletin,January 2003.2See: Brown, “Impact of Stock Market Decline On 50-70 Year Old Investors,” AARP, 2002.6

Methodology OverviewKnowledge Networks, a research firm based in California, administered this survey using itsweb-enabled panel of people who have agreed to participate in surveys. This panel is designedto be representative of the U.S. population and was built by providing Internet devices andInternet service connections to people who have agreed to serve on the online panel. Byproviding Internet access to willing participants, Knowledge Networks allows individuals whowould otherwise have no access to the Internet to participate in online research.Conducted from February 13th to February 20th, the survey was fielded to panel members whomet each of the following criteria: (i) are age 50 or older, (ii) own stocks, either as individualstocks or in mutual funds; and (iii) have primary or joint responsibility for making householdfinancial investment decisions. A total of 1,917 households participated in the survey.The survey was conducted online due to the need to collect opinions about fairly complex issuesin a timely manner. For example, concepts, such as the tradeoff between best available priceand transaction speed, would have been too complex to present over the telephone, and a mailsurvey would not have been possible within the short timeframe.7

III. DETAILED FINDINGSA. BEST AVAILABLE PRICE VS. SPEEDWhen presented with two opposing views related to the importance of obtaining the bestavailable stock price versus the importance of other issues such as speed of transaction,approximately two-thirds (66%) of respondents indicated that they agreed with the view statingthat best available price should be the top priority when conducting transactions.Best Available Price vs. Speed(n 1,917)View A: Best available price shouldbe top priority.View B: Important to balance need forprice with speed and other issues.Refused to answer66%31%3%Certain individuals, such as those who conduct fewer transactions per year, women, those whoare older, those living outside of the West census region, those with lower incomes, and thosewith less education were more likely to feel that best available price should be the top priority.Specifically, the following significant differences existed within subgroups:Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment Behaviors Investors who had conducted no mutual fund transactions, other than automatictransactions, within the past 12 months, were more likely (70%) than those who hadconducted at least three mutual fund transactions (59%) to agree with View A (bestprice). Individuals who had conducted only one or two individual stock transactions, other thanautomatic transactions, within the past 12 months, were more likely (72%) than thosewho had conducted at least three individual stock transactions (62%) to agree with ViewA (best price). Individuals who own stocks only in retirement investments were more likely (74%) thanthose who own stocks outside of retirement investments (66%) to agree with View A(best price).Likelihood to agree with View A (best price) did not vary based on whether a respondent ownedstocks as individual stocks or in mutual funds.Differences Based on Demographics Women were more likely (75%) than men (62%) to agree with View A (best price). Respondents ages 65 and older were more likely (71%) than individuals ages 50 to 64(66%) to agree with View A.8

Investors with no formal education beyond high school were more likely (74%) thanthose with at least some college education (65%) to agree with View A.Respondents with annual household incomes below 50,000 were more likely (71%) thanthose with incomes of 75,000 or more (61%) to agree with View A.Respondents in the Northeast, Midwest, and South census regions were more likely(69%) than those in the West census region (59%) to agree with View A.Likelihood to agree with View A (best price) did not vary based on any of the other demographicvariables tested, including race, employment status, and marital status.1. Strength of AgreementWhen asked how strongly they agreed with their selection, close to three in four (74%)respondents indicated that they somewhat agreed. Approximately one in four (26%) indicatedthat they strongly agreed. Supporters of View A (best price) and supporters of View B (speedand other issues) were equally likely to indicate that they strongly agreed with their respectiveviewpoints. Specifically, among View A supporters, 74 percent indicated that they somewhatagreed with View A, while only 26 percent indicated that they strongly agreed. Similarly,among View B supporters, 74 percent indicated that they somewhat agreed with View B, whileonly 26 percent strongly agreed with View B.Certain individuals, including those who own stocks both individually and in mutual funds, thosewho conduct more transactions per year, those with more formal education, and those withhigher household incomes are more likely than others to feel strongly about this matter.Specifically, the following significant differences existed within subgroups:Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment Behaviors Investors who own stocks both individually and in mutual funds were more likely (31%)than those who hold stocks only in mutual funds (23%) to strongly agree with one of theviews. Individuals who had conducted at least three mutual fund transactions, other thanautomatic transactions, within the past 12 months were more likely (34%) than those whohad conducted no such transactions (24%) to strongly agree with one of the views. Investors who had conducted at least one individual stock transaction, other thanautomatic transactions, within the past 12 months were more likely (34%) than those whohad conducted no such transactions (23%) to strongly agree with one of the views.Likelihood to strongly agree with one of the views did not vary based on whether a respondentowned stocks outside of retirement accounts.Differences Based on Demographics Investors who have at least some post-graduate education were more likely (32%) thanthose with no formal education beyond high school (22%) to strongly agree with one ofthe views.9

Investors with household incomes of at least 75,000 were more likely (31%) than thosewith household incomes between 25,000 and 50,000 (23%) to strongly agree with oneof the views.Likelihood to strongly agree with either view did not vary based on any of the otherdemographic variables tested, including the following: Gender Age Race Employment status Marital status Census region2. When Price Would Not be the Top Priority for “View A” SupportersWhen those respondents who selected View A (best price) were asked if there were anycircumstances under which best available price would not be their highest priority, almost half(48%) said that best available price would not be their top priority if obtaining the best pricemeant that they would have to pay high fees. Another 41 percent pointed to the need to conducttransactions quickly. Close to one in six (17%) reported that best available price would alwaysbe their highest priority.When Price Would Not Be the Top Priority for “View A” Supporters(n 1,274)48%If getting the best available price meant I would have to pay high fees41%If I needed to buy or sell shares quickly11%If I wanted to complete the transaction on the Internet rather than gothrough a stockbroker2%Other (specify)17%Under no circumstancesQ8. “Under which, if any, circumstances would getting the best available stock price not be yourhighest priority?” Base: Respondents who agreed that best available price should be top priority( “View A” on questionnaire).High FeesOf those respondents who selected View A (best price), those who were more likely than othersto feel that best available price would be less important if the best price implied high feesincluded those who own stocks in mutual funds, those who are employed, those who areyounger, those with more education, those with higher incomes, and those who have never beenmarried. The significant differences within these subgroups are further described below.Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment BehaviorsView A (best price) supporters who own stocks in mutual funds were more likely (56%) thanView A supporters who own only individual stocks (38%) to indicate that obtaining the bestprice would be less important if obtaining the best price implied “high fees.”10

Likelihood to indicate that high fees would reduce the importance of obtaining the best price didnot vary based on any of the other stock ownership and investment behavior variables tested,including the following: Whether a respondent owned stocks outside of retirement accounts Number of mutual fund transactions conducted within the past year Number of individual stock transactions conducted within the past yearDifferences Based on DemographicsThe following View A (best price) supporters were more likely than other View A supporters toindicate that high fees would reduce the importance of obtaining the best price: View A supporters who are employed (54%), as compared to those who are retired (42%) View A supporters between the ages of 50 and 64 (53%), as compared to those ages 65and older (41%) View A supporters who have at least a 4-year college degree (62%), as compared to thosewith less formal education (40%) View A supporters who have a household income of at least 25,000 (51%), as comparedto those with a household income of less than 25,000 (35%) View A supporters who have never been married (70%), as compared to those who aremarried, separated, divorced, or widowed (46%)Likelihood to indicate that high fees would reduce the importance of obtaining the best price didnot vary based on any of the other demographic variables tested, including gender, race, orcensus region.Need to Sell Shares QuicklyOf those respondents who selected View A (best price), those who felt that best price would nolonger be their top priority if they needed to sell shares quickly were more likely to beindividuals who own stocks outside of mutual funds, conduct more transactions, are retired, areages 65 or older, or are widowed. The significant differences within these subgroups areexplained below.Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment BehaviorsThe following View A (best price) supporters were more likely than other View A supporters toindicate that best price would be less important if they needed to sell shares quickly: View A supporters who own stocks only as individual stocks (45%), as compared toView A supporters who own stocks only in mutual funds (33%) View A supporters who had conducted one or two transactions of individual stock withinthe past year (54%), as compared to View A supporters who had conducted notransactions of individual stock within the past year (41%)Likelihood to cite the need to sell shares quickly did not vary based on whether a respondentowns stock outside of retirement accounts or based on number of mutual fund transactionsconducted within the past year.11

Differences Based on DemographicsView A (best price) supporters who are ages 65 or older were more likely (46%) than View Asupporters who are between the ages of 50 and 64 (37%) to indicate that the need to sell sharesquickly would reduce the importance of obtaining the best price. Others who were more likelyto feel this way included the following: View A supporters who are retired (45%), as compared to those who are not working(33%) View A supporters who are widowed (49%), as compared to those who have never beenmarried (32%) View A supporters who have household incomes between 25,000 and 50,000 (46%), ascompared to those with household incomes of 75,000 or higher (36%)Likelihood to cite the “need to sell shares quickly” did not vary based on any of the otherdemographic variables tested, including gender, education, race, and census region.Completing Transactions Through the InternetThe percentage of View A (best price) supporters who indicated that best price would no longerbe their top priority if they were completing a transaction on the Internet varied little acrosssubgroups. Only View A supporters with lower incomes or those living in the West censusregion were more likely than others to indicate that completing a transaction over the Internetwould reduce the importance of best price. The significant differences are further explainedbelow.Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment BehaviorsNone. (There were no significant differences based on any of the stock ownership andinvestment behavior variables examined, including ownership of stocks outside of retirementaccounts, ownership of individual stocks or mutual funds, and number of transactions conductedwithin the past year.)Differences Based on DemographicsView A (best price) supporters who have household incomes below 25,000 were more likely(19%) than those with incomes higher than 25,000 (9%) to indicate that completing atransaction over the Internet would reduce the importance of price. Others who were more likelyto feel this way included View A supporters in the West census region (14%) as compared tothose in the Northeast census region (9%).Likelihood to indicate that completing a transaction over the Internet would reduce theimportance of price did not vary based on any of the other demographic variables examined,including gender, age, education, marital status, or race.Under No CircumstancesCertain View A (best price) supporters, such as those who own stocks only as individual stocks,those who conducted no individual stock transactions within the past year, those who are retired,12

and those with less formal education were more likely than other View A supporters to say thatbest price would always be their top priority. Specifically, the significant differences withinsubgroups are outlined below.Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment BehaviorsThe following View A (best price) supporters were more likely than other View A supporters tofeel that best price would always be their top priority: View A supporters who own stocks only as individual stocks (20%), as compared toView A supporters who own stocks in mutual funds (14%) View A supporters who had conducted no individual stock transactions within the pastyear (21%), as compared to those who had conducted one or two individual stocktransactions within the past year (10%)A respondent’s likelihood to feel that best price would always be his or her top priority did notvary based on whether the respondent owned stocks outside of retirement accounts or based onnumber of mutual fund transactions conducted within the past year.Differences Based on DemographicsView A (best price) supporters who do not have a four-year college degree (20%) were morelikely than View A supporters who have either a four-year college degree or at least some postgraduate education (11%) to feel that best price would always be their top priority.A respondent’s likelihood to feel that best price would always be his or her top priority did notvary based on gender, age, income, marital status, race, or census region.3. Notification from BrokerOf all respondents, more than four in five (86%) either strongly or somewhat agreed that theirstock broker or mutual fund manager should notify them before completing a transaction inwhich best available price is not sought. Specifically, the majority (57%) of respondentsstrongly agreed that they should be notified if best available price is not sought, and close tothree in ten (29%) somewhat agreed.“If my stock broker or mutual fund firm buys or sells stock without seeking thebest available price, they should notify me before they complete the transaction.”(n 1,917)57%Strongly agree29%Somewhat agree10%Somewhat disagree3%Strongly disagree2%REFUSEDQ9. “Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statement.”13

Differences Based on Stock Ownership and Investment BehaviorsThose who were more likely than others to strongly agree that they should be notified if bestprice is not sought include investors who own individual stocks, those who conduct individualstock transactions other than automatic transactions, and those who own stocks outside ofretirement accounts. Specifically, the following investors were more likely than theircounterparts to str

Concerns and Worries About the Stock Market Fear of losing money (63%), lack of ethics (61%), and general concerns about the state of the economy (55%) top the list of respondent concerns about the stock market. More than half of respondents selected these items when asked to select from a list of eight possible concerns. In

Related Documents:

G. How Investor Relations Has Been Most Helpful to Board of Directors 21 H. How CEOs and Investor Relations Officers Gauge Success of Investor Relations and Investor Relations Incentive Compensation 22 I. Key Components of Effective Investor Relations Programs 23 J. Executives Interviewed 26 About Capital Markets Board 29

The intertwined aims of investor protection and the promotion of investor confidence in the integrity of securities markets are at the heart of IOSCO's objectives. 2. These aims, to varying degrees, are also the objectives of many IOSCO members. Investor education is a key strategy for enhancing investor protection. 3, promoting investor

Accenture Investor & Analyst Conference 1 April 25, 2018 Accenture . Investor & Analyst Conference . April 25, 2018. New York . ANGIE PARK – Managing Director, Head of Investor Relations. Good morning. I’m Angie Park, Managing Director, Head of Investor Relations and it is my

1. In QuickBooks, click on Edit and then Preferences to open the Preferences dialogue window. 2. Click on Accounting in the preferences list on left column. a. Click on the Company Preferences tab. b. Set Accounts preferences as follows: i. Use account numbers ii. Require accounts iii.

received via Encompass Investor connect are in the Investor Delivery condition type only. Condition templates are not supported for Investor Delivery conditions type. For detailed information about condition template, refer to the Working with Enhanced Conditions setup and user guide. Adding Investor Delivery Conditions to the eFolder

NAFTA Chapter 11 Investor-State Cases TABLE OF NAFTA CHAPTER 11 INVESTOR-STATE CASES & CLAIMS February 2005 Key **Indicates date Notice of Intent to File a Claim was filed, the first step in the NAFTA investor-state process when an investor notifies a government that it intends to bring a NAFTA Chapter 11 suit against that government.

B2R FINANCE FIRSTKEY LENDING INVESTOR REVIEW SERIES Brad Sumrok Multifamily Investing Events & Mentoring www.PersonalRealEstateInvestorMag.com INVESTOR REVIEW No. 5: Buy-To-Rent 1 I NVESTOR REVIEW Number 5 in Personal Real Estate Investor Magazine’s Investor Review S

The Fund agrees to admit Investor as a Limited Partner of the Fund, or . Unicorn Pairs Fund, LP Investor Subscription Agreement 7 to accept an additional capital contribution from Investor if Investor is already a Limited Partner