Draft Ity Of Pittsburgh
DRAFTC ITY OF P ITTSBURGHPENNSYLVANIAJURISDICTION:City of PittsburghMAYOR:Luke RavenstahlJURISDICTION WEB .city.pittsburgh.pa.us/NSP CONTACT PERSON:SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENTMs. Susan ScheuringADDRESS:For Submission to HUD200 Ross Street, 2nd FloorPittsburgh, PA 15219December 1, 2008TELEPHONE NUMBER:(412) 255-2667FAX NUMBER:(412) 393-0151EMAIL ADDRESS:sue.scheuring@city.pittsburgh.pa.us
City of Pittsburgh,PennsylvaniaNEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM (NSP)CITY OF PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIATABLE OF CONTENTSA.Table of Contents . . . . . .1B.SF 424 Form .2C.Executive Summary .3D.Areas of Greatest Need . .4E.Distribution and Uses of Funds 20F.Definitions and Descriptions . 25G.Low Income Targeting 28H.Acquisitions and Relocation .29I.Public Comment Period .30J.Information By Activity . .32K.Total Budget .41L.Performance Measures .42M.Certifications . 43Neighborhood Stabilization Program1FY 2008
City of Pittsburgh,PennsylvaniaB.HUD SF 424 FORM:1.HUD SF 424 Form –Attached is the Standard Form – 424, as required by HUD, in support of the Cityof Pittsburgh’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program Application.Neighborhood Stabilization Program2FY 2008
City of Pittsburgh,PennsylvaniaC.EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:1.Executive Summary –The City of Pittsburgh is required to prepare a substantial amendment to the FY2008 Consolidated Annual Action Plan to add the anticipated funds from the U.SDepartment of Housing and Development (HUD) under the NeighborhoodStabilization Program. This amended plan outlines the use of NeighborhoodStabilization Program funds that the City will receive under Title III of Division Bof the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA), signed by thePresident on July 30, 2008. Congress appropriated 3.92 billion to the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development. These funds are to be used foremergency assistance for redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homesand residential properties under the program entitled Neighborhood StabilizationProgram (NSP). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Developmentallocated 2,002,958 in Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds to the City ofPittsburgh.The eligible uses of the Neighborhood Stabilization funds are:1.Establish financing mechanisms for purchase and redevelopmentof foreclosed homes and residential properties2.Purchase and rehabilitate homes and residential propertiesabandoned or foreclosed3.Establish land banks for foreclosed homes4.Demolish blighted structures5.Redevelop demolished or vacant propertiesDue to the nature of these funds to help stimulate the economy, the time forsubmittal of the application is December 1, 2008 and the funds need to beexpended within 18 months after the application has been approved and acontract is awarded.The City of Pittsburgh’s Department of City Planning in cooperation with theUrban Redevelopment Authority of the City of Pittsburgh will submit the revisedplan. The Urban Redevelopment Authority will administer and monitor theNeighborhood Stabilization Program funds.Neighborhood Stabilization Program3FY 2008
City of Pittsburgh,PennsylvaniaD.AREAS OF GREATEST NEED:1.Areas of Greatest Need –The City of Pittsburgh has an allocation of 2,002,958 in NeighborhoodStabilization Program funds. The allocations are based on local foreclosure rate,local abandonment risk, statewide foreclosure rate, and statewide abandonmentrisk.Neighborhood Stabilization Program Allocation for PennsylvaniaCommunityNSPAllocation 59,631,318State of PennsylvaniaAllegheny County 5,524,950Allentown 2,113,456Philadelphia 16,832,873Pittsburgh 2,002,958York County 2,017,253Sources: umMediumNote: Foreclosure start rate is sum of foreclosure starts over 18 months; estimated for local areas. Riskscore based on vacancies in Census Tracts with high rates of high cost loans. See methodology.The City of Pittsburgh has a local foreclosure rate of 4.7% and a high abandonmentrisk. The City of Pittsburgh has the third largest foreclosure rate of Federal EntitlementCommunities in the state. The State of Pennsylvania overall has a 3% foreclosure rateand a medium local abandonment risk. In the County, there is a 20.15% of sub primemortgages between 2004 and 2006.The City of Pittsburgh will use the following sources of data to determine the areas ofgreatest need in the City from the HUD Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk Scores. Thesefigures are based on the following information: Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) Unemployment Rate Predicted 18 Month Foreclosure Rate USPS Residential Vacancy RateForeclosure/Abandonment Risk –The Low-, Moderate, and Middle-Income Benefit with Abandonment/Foreclosure RiskScores were obtained from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’sNeighborhood Stabilization Program4FY 2008
City of Pittsburgh,Pennsylvaniawebsite, www.hud.gov. Attached at the end of this section is the Areas of Low-,Moderate-, and Middle-Income Benefit with Abandonment/Foreclosure Risk Scores bycensus track and block group for the City of Pittsburgh. The areas of greatest need arethose with a Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk Score of 8 and above.The areas of greatest need with Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk score of 10 3123236NeighborhoodMiddle HillMiddle HillMiddle HillUpper HillUpper HillUpper HillBedford DwellingsUpper LawrencevilleUpper LawrencevilleUpper LawrencevilleLincoln LemingtonBelmarLincoln LemingtonBelmarLincoln LemingtonBelmarLincoln LemingtonBelmarLarimerLarimerHomewood WestHomewood WestLarimerLarimerHomewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthEast HillsEast HillsEast HillsNeighborhood Stabilization andonmentRisk ScorePercentlt 120AMIPersonslt 678801,0345565797205346475137614882,7025FY 2008
City of rlingtonSt. ClairMount verBeltzhooverBeltzhooverBeltzhooverMount WashingtonMount WashingtonSouth ShoreEsplenSheradenSheradenSheradenWest EndElliottElliottElliottChartiers CitySheradenSheradenSheradenSpring GardenSpring GardenCalifornia KirkbrideFineviewFineviewNorthview HeightsPerry SouthPerry SouthPerry SouthPerry SouthPerry SouthPerry od Stabilization Program6EstimatedForeclosureAbandonmentRisk ntlt 120AMIPersonslt 15266359367391,0862,5657488469677179261,040FY 2008
City of 121212311231234567Spring Hill City ViewSpring Hill City ViewSpring Hill City ViewBrighton HeightsBrighton ESEstimatedForeclosureAbandonmentRisk centlt 120AMIPersonslt 584392534796738700The areas with Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk score of 9 ntRisk ScorePercentlt 120AMIPersonslt West OaklandWest OaklandPolish HillPolish HillStanton HeightsStanton HeightsGarfieldGarfieldGarfieldEast LibertyEast LibertyEast LibertyEast ighborhood Stabilization Program7FY 2008
City of 231234512123121121212123451234511234East LibertyEast LibertyEast LibertyEast LibertyGlen HazelSouth Side SlopesSouth Side SlopesSouth Side SlopesMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount hviewManchesterManchesterPerry NorthPerry NorthPerry NorthPerry NorthPerry NorthEast CarnegieWindgapWindgapCrafton HeightsCrafton HeightsCrafton HeightsCrafton arrickCarrickCarrickCarrickHaysLincoln PlaceLincoln PlaceLincoln PlaceLincoln od Stabilization Program8EstimatedForeclosureAbandonmentRisk Percentlt 120AMIPersonslt 6806961,0479131,263683614701461702857602845FY 2008
City of MiddleLow/ModEligible3102005Lincoln PlaceYESEstimatedForeclosureAbandonmentRisk Score9Percentlt 120AMIPersonslt 120AMITotalPersons70.3%496706The areas with Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk score of 8 ModEligibleEstimatedForeclosureAbandonmentRisk ScorePercentlt 120AMIPersonslt 120AMITotalPersonsBluffBluffLower LawrencevilleLower eldCentral LawrencevilleCentral LawrencevillePoint Breeze NorthPoint Breeze NorthPoint Breeze NorthSouth Side SlopesSouth Side SlopesSouth Side SlopesSouth Side SlopesMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount hviewBeechviewBeechviewBeechviewTroy HillTroy HillCentral NorthsideSummer HillBrighton HeightsBrighton 121,156676777Neighborhood Stabilization Program9FY 2008
City of andonmentRisk Score888Percentlt 120AMIPersonslt 560Low/Mod Income Profile –The City of Pittsburgh has an overall low- and moderate-income percentage of52.82% of its population. These low- and moderate-income statistics wereobtained from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’swebsite, www.hud.gov. The following is the low- and moderate-income chart thatlist the individual low/mod percentages by Census Tract and Block Group in theCity of Pittsburgh.Low/Mod Income Chart by Block Group for the City of Pittsburgh, 2112112341231NEIGHBORHOODBluffBluffCentral Business DistrictCentral Business DistrictCentral Business DistrictCentral Business DistrictStrip DistrictCrawford-RobertsCrawford-RobertsWest OaklandWest OaklandNorth OaklandNorth OaklandNorth OaklandCentral OaklandCentral OaklandCentral OaklandSouth OaklandSouth OaklandSouth OaklandSouth OaklandMiddle HillMiddle HillMiddle HillUpper HillNeighborhood Stabilization 549.8FY 2008
City of RHOODUpper HillUpper HillNorth OaklandNorth OaklandBedford DwellingsTerrace VillageTerrace VillageTerrace VillageLower LawrencevilleLower LawrencevillePolish HillPolish ldBloomfieldCentral LawrencevilleCentral LawrencevilleCentral LawrencevilleCentral LawrencevilleCentral LawrencevilleCentral LawrencevilleBloomfieldBloomfieldStanton HeightsNeighborhood Stabilization 3.580.362.655.225.2FY 2008
City of 012080013010021212121NEIGHBORHOODStanton HeightsUpper LawrencevilleUpper LawrencevilleUpper ingsideGarfieldGarfieldGarfieldStanton HeightsStanton HeightsHighland ParkHighland ParkHighland ParkHighland ParkHighland ParkHighland ParkHighland ParkEast LibertyEast LibertyEast LibertyEast LibertyGarfieldGarfieldEast LibertyEast LibertyEast LibertyEast arimerLarimerHomewood WestHomewood WestLarimerLarimerHomewood NorthNeighborhood Stabilization .581.966.277.884.866.574.312FY 2008
City of ewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood NorthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthHomewood SouthEast HillsEast HillsEast HillsSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthSquirrel Hill NorthPoint BreezePoint BreezePoint BreezePoint Breeze NorthPoint Breeze NorthPoint Breeze NorthPoint BreezePoint BreezePoint BreezeSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthRegent SquareSwisshelm ParkSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthNeighborhood Stabilization .638.360.521.328.7FY 2008
City of irrel Hill SouthSquirrel Hill SouthHazelwoodHazelwoodGlen rlingtonArlingtonArlington HeightsSt. ClairMt. OliverSouthside SlopesSouthside SlopesSouthside SlopesSouthside SlopesSouthside FlatsSouthside FlatsSouthside FlatsSouthside FlatsSouthside FlatsSouthside SlopesSouthside SlopesSouthside SlopesAllentownAllentownAllentownAllentownBon AirMount WashingtonNeighborhood Stabilization 7FY 2008
City of nt WashingtonMount overMount WashingtonMount WashingtonDuquesne HeightsDuquesne HeightsDuquesne HeightsMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount WashingtonMount eechviewBeechviewSouth ShoreRidgemontEsplenNeighborhood Stabilization 38.545.353.647.642.74553.460.343.144.9FY 2008
City of radenSheradenSheradenWest EndElliottElliottElliottChartiers nksvilleManchesterManchesterChateauAllegheny WestAllegheny CenterNorth ShoreCentral NorthsideCentral NorthsideEast AlleghenyEast AlleghenyTroy HillTroy HillSpring GardenSpring GardenCentral NorthsideCalifornia-KirkbrideFineviewFineviewPerry NorthPerry NorthPerry NorthPerry NorthPerry NorthNorthview HeightsSummer HillPerry SouthPerry SouthPerry SouthPerry SouthNeighborhood Stabilization .870.759.7FY 2008
City of ry SouthPerry SouthSpring Hill-City ViewSpring Hill-City ViewSpring Hill-City ViewBrighton HeightsBrighton HeightsBrighton HeightsBrighton HeightsMarshall-ShadelandBrighton HeightsBrighton HeightsBrighton l-ShadelandEast woodCrafton HeightsCrafton HeightsCrafton HeightsCrafton oxvilleKnoxvilleKnoxvilleNeighborhood Stabilization 65.278.953FY 2008
City of noxvilleHaysLincoln PlaceLincoln PlaceLincoln PlaceLincoln PlaceLincoln PlaceNew lineOverbrookOverbrookCity of Pittsburgh's 164,650311,73052.82%Of the 343 Census Tract and Block Groups in the City, 100 haveForeclosure/Abandonment Risk Scores of 10 and 98 are low- and moderateincome (98%); 64 have Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk Scores of 9 and 62 arelow- and moderate-income (93.8%); and 40 have Foreclosure/Abandonment RiskScores of 8 and 38 are low- and moderate-income (95%). This means that 198of the total are low- and moderate-income Census Tract and Block Groups andhave Foreclosure/Abandonment Risk Scores of 8 to 10 (57.8%).Maps:Included in this Neighborhood Stabilization Program are the following maps: Census Tracts for the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Total Population by Census Tract for the City of Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania Low- and Moderate-Income Census Tracts Map for the City ofPittsburgh, Pennsylvania Mortgage Foreclosure Map for the City of Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaNeighborhood Stabilization Program18FY 2008
City of Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania Neighborhood Stabilization Program with HUD Foreclosure ScoresMap for the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Neighborhood Stabilization Program with Mortgage Foreclosuresfor the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Blight Map for the City of Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaNeighborhood Stabilization Program19FY 2008
City of Pittsburgh,PennsylvaniaE.DISTRIBUTION AND USES OF FUNDS:1.Distribution and Uses of Funds –The City of Pittsburgh proposed to use the Neighborhood Stabilization Programfunds to help areas that have been effected by HMDA High Cost Loan Rates,Foreclosure Rate, and Residential Vacancy Rate that produce the greatestfore
The City of Pittsburgh has a local foreclosure rate of 4.7% and a high abandonment risk. The City of Pittsburgh has the third largest foreclosure rate of Federal Entitlement Communities in the state. The State of Pennsylvania overall has a 3% foreclosure rate and a medium local abandonment risk. In the County, there is a 20.15% of sub prime
101 Hill Avenue Carnegie PA 15106-3006 412-276-9233 chabassol@verizon.net Vice President Robert A. Milisits 6382 Morrowfield Avenue Pittsburgh PA 15217-2505 . versity of Pittsburgh Chess Club & Organized by the Pittsburgh Chess League. December 7. 49th Annual Pittsburgh Chess League : Round 4. 30/90, SD/60. Assembly Room, Main Floor , William .
0003e00063000000 17th ward - pittsburgh 425 e carson st pittsburgh pa 15203 5/28/2019 6/5/2019 . pittsburgh 30 -62 s 6th st pittsburgh pa 15203 1/28/2019 2/6/2019 . pittsburgh 11 5th
BSN, University of Pittsburgh, 1977 . MSN, University of Pittsburgh, 1981 . Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of . School of Nursing in partial fulfillment . of the requirements for the degree of . Doctor of Philosophy . University of Pittsburgh . 2010
Printed for the Patent Law Association of Pitts burgh by and with ttie compliments of Pittsburgh Printing Company, 580-584 Fmmando Stareet. THE PATENT BAR OF PITTSBURGH BAYAKI) H. CHRISTY When Mr. Stebbins asked me to prepare an his torical paper, on the Patent Bar of Pittsburgh, my first thought was that compliance should he easy. Remember
calcu lated u sin g estim ates o f th e fluxes an d th e w o rst p o ssib le erro r v ecto r are u p p er b o u n d s o n th e sy stem 's actu al sen sitiv ity . B y ex am in in g th e effect o f m easu rem en t erro r o n th e sen sitiv ity , th e m o st p ro b ab le sen sitiv ity is calcu lated . T h ese resu lts in d icate th at an ap p ro x im ate tw o -fo ld in crease in sen sitiv ity o f .
INVITATION FOR BIDS Sealed bids will be received in the ity lerk’s office, ity Hall, 103 E Main St, Auburn, Kentucky until 10:00 a.m. CT, January 11, 2019. City of Auburn Park Playground Equipment All bids must be turned in to the ity lerk’s Office, ity Hall, 103 E Main St, Auburn Kentucky no later
Pittsburgh is a regional center for business, industry, research, education, recreation, and the arts. Few of the steel mills that once gave Pittsburgh its prominence remain. Today, the health care industry, high-tech companies, and service industries employ many Pittsburghers. Pittsburgh is enriched by a vibrant cultural life and ethnic diversity.
For AOl or A02 Transactions where abo·ve situations apply. 9 characters 853: Date (mm/dd/yy) DESCRIPTION: REQUIRED: LENGTH: ENTER: CODES DEFINED: EXAII1PLE: 033-1 c6/0084 2.105 (Rev. 05/90) ITEM 856 - DEMOTION REASON Explanation of employee's preference in voluntarily demoting or choosing a demotion other than that which was directed (e.g., layoff, reassignment, etc.). For A02 Transaction .
