(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,006,210 B2

1y ago
7 Views
1 Downloads
3.05 MB
38 Pages
Last View : 4d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Angela Sonnier
Transcription

USOO900621 OB2(12) United States PatentPearlman(54) COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FORTREATING CORNEAL INFLAMMATION(75) Inventor: Eric Pearlman, Lakeline, OH (US)(73) Assignee: Case Western Reserve University,Cleveland, OH (US)(*) Notice:Subject to any disclaimer, the term of thispatent is extended or adjusted under 35U.S.C. 154(b) by 105 days.(21) Appl. No.:12/997,444(22) PCT Filed:Jun. 15, 2009(86). PCT No.:S371 (c)(1),(2), (4) Date:PCT/US2009/0474O7Dec. 10, 2010(87) PCT Pub. No.: WO2009/152517PCT Pub. Date: Dec. 17, 2009(65)(10) Patent No.:Prior Publication DataUS 2011 FO105426A1May 5, 2011Related U.S. Application Data(60) Provisional application No. 61/101493, filed on Sep.30, 2008, provisional application No. 61/061,291,filed on Jun. 13, 2008.(51) Int. Cl.A6 IK3I/706A6IP27/02A6IP 29/00A6IP3/04A6 01)(52) U.S. Cl.CPC . A61 K3I/665 (2013.01)(58) Field of Classification SearchCPC combination set(s) only.See application file for complete search history.References CitedU.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS6,719,929 B22001/0045676 A14/2004 Winterton et al.11/2001 Winterton et al.Apr. 14, 20152004/0266702 A1* 12/2004 Dawson et al. . 514, 282006/0051821 A12008, OOO8749 A13/2006 Rossignol et al.1/2008 Pearlman et al.FOREIGN PATENT 69O11936720070266752007031879WO 2008/O76804AA1AA1A1A2A29, 20082, 20083, 20033, 20013, 20073, 20076, 2008OTHER PUBLICATIONSKhatri et al. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Jul.2002, vol.43, No. 7, pp. 2278-2284.*Johnson, Angela, C. et al., “Activation of Toll-Like Receptor (TLR)2.TLR4, and TLR9 in the Mammalian Cornea Induces MyD88-Dependent Corneal Inflammation'. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.2005:46:589-595).Sun, Yan, et al., “Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Corneal Inflammation Is Dependent on Toll-Like Receptor 2 and Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88”. Infection and Immunity, Sep. 2006, p. 5325-5332.European Search Report dated Aug. 27, 2012.Hutchinson, M.R., et al., “Evidence That Tricyclic Small MoleculesMay Possess Toll-Like Receptor and Myeloid Differentiation Protein2 Activity”. Neuroscience 168 (2010) 551-563.Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 6, 2013.Peri, Francesco, et al., “Therapeutic targeting of innate immunitywith Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonists'. BiotechnologyAdvances 30 (2012) 251-260.Hawkins, Lynn D., et al., “Inhibition of Endotoxin Response bySynthetic TLR4 Agonists'. Current Topics in Medicine Chemistry,2004, 4, 1147-1171.Ianaro, A., et al., “New Insight in LPS Antagonist'. Min-Reviews inMedical Chemistry, 2009, 9,306–317.Leon, Carlos G. et al., “Discovery and Development of Toll-LikeReceptor 4 (TLR4) Antagonists: A New Paradigm for Treating forTreating Sepsis and Other Diseases'. Pharmaceutical Research. vol.25, No. 8, Aug. 2008, pp. 1751-1761.* cited by examinerPrimary Examiner — Layla Bland(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Tarolli, Sundheim, Covell& Tummino LLP(57)(56)US 9,006,210 B2(45) Date of Patent:ABSTRACTA method of treating corneal inflammation in a subjectincludes administering to the Subject a therapeutically effective amount of a TLR4 antagonist.26 Claims, 15 Drawing Sheets

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 1 of 15FIG. 1US 9,006,210 B2

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 2 of 15US 9,006,210 B2CXCL1 IKCnaivelens Eriteran PlaceboFIG. 2

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 3 of 15FIG. 3US 9,006,210 B2

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 4 of 15US 9,006,210 B2NaiveLFPSE5564 -i- LPSPacebo - LPSS.FIG. 4

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 5 Of 15US 9,006,210 B2Neutrophis--ossot7 inStrona haze&SS38eeS3SPSFIG. 6i.sengiriw

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 6 of 15US 9,006,210 B2Neutrophilsi3.FaiveEriteranplaceboPanCysFIG. 7Strona hazeSgS.saveEritoranpiaceboPams,CysFIG. 8

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 7 Of 15US 9,006,210 B2Neutrophilsin a naysya&SSSSSsye:ENpriorsameRSFIG. 9Stroa azeFas5000i40001"TsFSFIG. 10post

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 8 of 15US 9,006,210 B2Neutrophilss S.isi1.o.350.17 (mg/ml)0.350.17 (mg/ml)60004000:888SSSS:888SRRR&istPSFIG. 12

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 9 Of 15-euOJ?SSTEFO TTIGHNÍQJLId VCIUS 9,006,210 B2

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 10 of 15US 9,006,210 B2Corneal epithelial cellsS.TsSet 4030020E is 3. siaeetLPSFIG. 14Corneal epithelial cellsis is

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 11 of 15US 9,006,210 B2Macrophages3:3000E 2500live2000e.FIG. 16MacrophagesEssix 8is tex isPamcysFIG. 17is

U.S. PatentApr. 14, 2015Sheet 12 of 15Neutrophils1500FIG. 18itsratplacebo ngiriPamCysFIG. 19US 9,006,210 B2

US 9,006,210 B21.2infection; otherwise, they can have an adverse effect on theCOMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FORTREATING CORNEAL INFLAMMATIONinfection. Furthermore, Steroid use can cause increased ocular pressure, thereby increasing the risk of glaucoma, and areoften administered together with anti-glaucoma treatment.RELATED APPLICATIONSUMMARY OF THE INVENTIONThis application corresponds to PCT/US09/47407, filedJun. 15, 2009, which claims the benefit of U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 61/101,493, filed Sep. 30, 2008 and 61/061,291, filed Jun. 13, 2008, the subject matter, of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.10TECHNICAL FIELDThe present invention relates to compositions and methodsthat are useful in the treatment and prevention of corneal15inflammation and/or conditions related to corneal inflammation.the corneal inflammation associated with contact lens wear.BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTIONFollowing an insult to the cornea, the immune and inflammatory systems respond to protect the integrity of the eye.This protective mechanism can have clinical manifestationsranging from cellular infiltration to ulcer formation. Thoughprotective, these processes often compromise the primaryfunction of the eye by causing vascularization, Scarring and/or perforation of the cornea.For example, it has been demonstrated that exposure of theabraded corneal surface to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or otherbacterial products induces corneal inflammation causing neutrophil-rich infiltrates in the corneal stroma (Johnson et al.,Invest. Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2005:46:589-595; Khatri et al.,Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2002:43:2278-2284; Schultz etal., Infection and Immunity 2000; 68:1731-1734; Schultz etal., Exper. Eve Res. 1997; 64:3-9: Sun et al., Infection andImmunity 2006: 74:5325-5332).253035When there is an insult to the corneal surface, inflammatory and/or immune cells are sent to repair the damage. Thesecells can aggregate in a region of the cornea and are visible asclinically identifiable infiltrates. This infiltrate formation and40resultant corneal inflammation can arise from either infectious or non-infectious conditions. One infectious conditionthat can adversely affect the cornea is bacterial keratitis.Major causes of bacterial keratitis in the USA and worldwideinclude infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis and Streptococcus species. Indeveloping countries, bacterial keratitis is primarily associated with trauma related to agricultural work; whereas, inblurred vision and severe discomfort. Given that the numberof contact lens wearers exceeds 34 million in the USA and45505560contact lens wearers with these clinical manifestations transinfiltrates. The side effects of steroid use are considerable. Ininfectious keratitis, Steroids are given only after resolution ofaccordance with an aspect of a therapeutic method of thepresent invention.FIG. 2 illustrates a graph comparing chemokine production from LPS-stimulated corneas treated witheritoran tetra140 million worldwide, the relatively small percentage oflates to large total number of individuals affected (Stapletonet al., Optom. Vis. Sci. 2007: 84:257-272).Currently, steroid use is the only treatment for cornealBRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGSFIG. 1 illustrates a photograph of a contact lens applied toIn addition to infectious keratitis, contact lens wear is alsoassociated with sterile, culture-negative clinical manifestations, including contact lens associated red eye (CLARE).contact lens peripheral ulcers (CLPU), and contact lens associated corneal infiltrates CLACI (Stapleton et al., Optom VisSci. 2007; 84:257-272). Although symptoms from thesemanifestations are less severe than symptoms associated withinfectious keratitis, affected individuals have pain, redness,The present invention also relates to a method of treating aTLR-induced inflammatory response in a subjects cornea.The method includes administering to the Subject a therapeutically effective amount of a TLR4 antagonist to treat theTLR-induced inflammatory response.The present invention also relates to a contact lens fortreating corneal inflammation in a subject. The contact lensincludes a Substrate and a coating. The coating includes anamount of TLR4 antagonist effective in treating cornealinflammation in the Subject.The present invention further relates to an ophthalmicpreparation for treating corneal inflammation in a Subject.The ophthalmic preparation includes an ophthalmic Solutionand an amount of TLR4 antagonist effective in treating corneal inflammation in the Subject.The present invention also relates to a method of treatinginfectious keratitis in a Subject. The method includes administering to the Subject a therapeutically effective amount of aTLR4 antagonist and at least one of an antibacterial agent,antiviral agent, or antifungal agent.a Surface of a cornea treated with eritoran tetrasodium inindustrialized countries, bacterial keratitis is associated withcontact lens wear.The present invention relates to a method of treating corneal inflammation in a subject. The method includes administering to the Subject a therapeutically effective amount of atoll like receptor 4 (TLR4) antagonist to treat the cornealinflammation in the Subject.The present invention also relates to a method of treatingcorneal inflammation in a subject associated with contact lenswear. The method includes administering to the Subject atherapeutically effective amount of a TLR4 antagonist to treat65sodium (E) (E5564) or placebo (P).FIG. 3 illustrates a graph comparing chemokine production from Pam3Cys stimulated corneas, eritoran treated corneas (E), and placebo groups (P).FIG. 4 illustrates confocal microscopy images of the central cornea stimulated with LPS, eritoran tetrasodium (E) andLPS, and Placebo and LPS.FIG. 5 illustrates a graph comparing neutrophil infiltrate inLPS-stimulated corneas for different dose responses for micetreated with eritoran tetrasodium (E) or placebo (P).FIG. 6 illustrates a graph comparing stromal haze in LPSstimulated corneas for different dose responses for micetreated with eritoran tetrasodium (E) or placebo (P).FIG. 7 illustrates a graph comparing neutrophil infiltrate inPam3Cys-stimulated corneas for different dose responses formice treated eritoran tetrasodium (E) or placebo (P).FIG. 8 illustrates a graph comparing stromal haze inPam3Cys-stimulated corneas for different dose responses formice treated with eritoran tetrasodium (E) or placebo (P).

US 9,006,210 B24used herein have the same meaning as commonly understoodby one of ordinary skill in the art to which this inventionbelongs.As used herein, the term “Toll like receptor 4 antagonist' or“TLR4 antagonist” refers to an agent, Such as a small molecule, polypeptide, polynucleotide, that is capable of substantially reducing, inhibiting, blocking, and/or mitigating the3FIG. 9 illustrates a graph comparing neutrophil infiltrate incorneas for different dose responses for mice treated eritorantetrasodium (E) or placebo (P) before and after LPS stimulation.FIG. 10 illustrates a graph comparing stromal haze in corneas for different dose responses for mice treated eritorantetrasodium (E) or placebo (P) before and after LPS stimulaactivation of TLR4 of a cell.tion.FIG. 11 illustrates a graph comparing the dose response fortreating neutrofil infiltrate in corneas with eritoran tetraso10dium after LPS stimulation.FIG. 12 illustrates a graph comparing the dose response fortreating Stromal haze in corneas with eritoran tetrasodiumafter LPS stimulation.FIG. 13 illustrates eritoran tetrasodium (E) or placebo (P)treated LPS-stimulated mice cornea sections stained using aterminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dOTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay, and counterstained with 4,6-diamidino2-phenylindole (DAPI) to identify individual cells.FIG. 14 illustrates a graph showing the IL-8 levels in theculture supernatant of human corneal epithelial cells (HCET) stimulated with LPS in the presence of eritoran tetrasodium (E) versus placebo (P) after 24 hours.FIG. 15 illustrates a graph showing the IL-8 levels in theculture supernatant of human corneal epithelial cells (HCET) stimulated with Pam3cys in the presence of eritoran tetrasodium (E) versus placebo (P) after 24 hours.FIG. 16 illustrates a graph showing the IL-8 levels in theculture supernatant of macrophages (U937) stimulated withLPS in the presence of eritoran tetrasodium (E) versus placebo (P) after 3 hours.FIG. 17 illustrates a graph showing the IL-8 levels in theculture supernatant of macrophages (U937) stimulated withPam3cys in the presence of eritoran tetrasodium (E) versusplacebo (P) after 3 hours.FIG. 18 illustrates a graph showing the IL-8 levels in theculture supernatant of neutrophils (HL60) stimulated withLPS in the presence of eritoran tetrasodium (E) versus placebo (P) after 3 hours.FIG. 19 illustrates a graph showing the IL-8 levels in theculture supernatant of neutrophils (HL60) stimulated withPam3cys in the presence of eritoran tetrasodium (E) versusplacebo (P) after 3 hours.FIG. 20 illustrates a graph comparing neutrophil infiltratein P. aeruginosa-stimulated corneas of C57BL/6, TLR415As used herein, the term “effective amount” refers to a25mation and/or a disease or disorder associated with cornealeffected.304045ciated with corneal inflammation and/or results in therapeutically relevant effect. By way of example, a “therapeuticallyeffective amount” may be understood as an amount of TLR4antagonist required to reduce corneal inflammation in a Subject.As used herein, the terms “parenteral administration' and“administered parenterally refers to modes of administrationother than enteral and topical administration, usually byinjection, and includes, without limitation, intravenous, intramuscular, intraarterial, intrathecal, intraventricular, intracapSular, intraorbital, intracardiac, intradermal, intraperitoneal,transtracheal. Subcutaneous, Subcuticular, intraarticular, Subcapsular, Subarachnoid, intraspinal and intrasternal injectionand infusion.MD-2 mice after 24 hours.50aeruginosa-stimulated corneas of C57BL/6, TLR4 andMD-2 mice after 24 hours.As used herein, the terms “pharmaceutically or pharmacologically acceptable' refer to molecular entities and compositions that do not produce an adverse, allergic or other untoward reaction when administered to an animal, or a human, as5560DETAILED DESCRIPTIONUnless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific termsAs used herein, the term “therapeutically effectiveamount refers to that amount of a TLR4 antagonist administered alone and/or in combination with additional therapeutic agents that results in amelioration of symptoms associatedwith corneal inflammation and/or a disease or disorder asso35Paeruginosa-stimulated corneas of C57BL/6, TLR4 andFor convenience, certain terms employed in the specification, examples, and appended claims are collected here.dosage of a TLR4 antagonist administered alone or in conjunction with any additional therapeutic agents that are effective and/or sufficient to provide treatment of corneal inflaminflammation. The effective amount can vary depending onthe Subject, the disease being treated, and the treatment beingFIG. 21 illustrates a graph comparing stromal thickness inFIG. 23 illustrates a graph comparing neutrophil infiltratein Paeruginosa-stimulated corneas of C57BL/6 mice treatedwith eritoran tetrasodium or placebo after 24 hours.FIG. 24 illustrates a graph comparing stromal thickness inP. aeruginosa-stimulated corneas of C57BL/6 mice treatedwith eritoran tetrasodium or placebo after 24 hours.FIG. 25 illustrates a graph comparing stromal haze in Paeruginosa-stimulated corneas of C57BL/6 mice treated witheritoran tetrasodium or placebo after 24 hours.of inhibition of, reduction of elimination of, or the amelioration of a disease or pathological condition (e.g. cornealinflammation) including, for example, preventing cornealinflammation from developing, inhibiting corneal inflammation development, arresting development of clinical Symptoms associated with corneal inflammation, and/or relievingthe symptoms associated with corneal inflammation.and MD-2 mice after 24 hours.FIG. 22 illustrates a graph comparing stromal haze in PAs used herein, the term “subject” refers to any warmblooded organism including, but not limited to, humanbeings, pigs, rats, mice, dogs, goats, sheep, horses, monkeys,apes, rabbits, cattle, etc.As used herein, the terms “treatment,” “treating,” or “treat'refers to any specific method or procedure used for the cure65appropriate. Veterinary uses are equally included within theinvention and “pharmaceutically acceptable' formulationsinclude formulations for both clinical and/or veterinary use.As used herein, “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier'includes any and all solvents, dispersion media, coatings,antibacterial and antifungal agents, isotonic and absorptiondelaying agents and the like. The use of Such media andagents for pharmaceutical active Substances is well known inthe art. Except insofar as any conventional media or agent isincompatible with the active ingredient, its use in the therapeutic compositions is contemplated. For human administration, preparations should meet sterility, pyrogenicity, generalsafety and purity standards as required by FDA Office ofBiologics standards. Supplementary active ingredients canalso be incorporated into the compositions.

US 9,006,210 B25As used herein, “Unit dosage' formulations are those con-6-continuedtaining a dose or Sub-dose of the administered ingredientOadapted for a particular timed delivery. For example, “unitOldosage" formulations are those containing a daily dose or unitJ-G-K, andor daily sub-dose or a weekly dose or unit or weekly sub-dose 5Ol ulJKand the like.As used herein the term “alkyl refers to aliphatic organicgroups which may be branched or straight and which mayoptionally be substituted with one or more halogen atoms atwhere each J, K, and Q, independently, is straight orbranched C1 to C15 alkyl; L is O, NH, or CH; Mis O or NH;and G is NH, O, S, SO, or SO;salt includes salts of compounds derived from the combination of the compound and an organic or inorganic acid or base.The present invention relates generally to methods of treatbranched C5 to C18 alkyl,any position along the alkyl chain.10As used herein, the term “pharmaceutically acceptableR is straight or branched C5 to C15 alkyl:R is selected from the group consisting of straight oring corneal inflammation in a subject as well as to methods of 15Omitigating cornealopacities (e.g., corneal haze, stromal haze,Olstromal thickness) associated with corneal inflammation. Inone example, the corneal inflammation can be caused byand/or related to contact lens wear. In other examples, thelA-CH CH-B,A-CHEC-D,Bcorneal inflammation can be associated with uveitis, Scleritis, 20episcleritis, keratitis, ocular or ophthalmic Surgery (e.g., cor-nea Surgery), endophthalmitis, iritis, atrophic macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa, iatrogenic retinopathy, retinalQOllA-CEC-B,Otears and holes, cystoid macular edema, diabetic macularA-E-B-CH CH-D, andledema, diabetic retinopathy, sickle cell retinopathy, retinal 25A-E-B-CEC-Dvein and artery occlusion, optic neuropathy, exudative macular degeneration, neovascular glaucoma, corneal neovascularization, cyclitis, sickle cell retinopathy, and pterygium.where E is NH, O, S, SO, or SO; each A, B, and D,According to an embodiment of a method of the present independently, is straight or branched C1 to C15 alkyl:invention, corneal inflammation in a Subject can be substan- 30R4 is selected from the group consisting of Straight ortially reduced and/or mitigated by administering a TLR4 branched C4 to C20 alkyl, andantagonist to the subject’s cornea at an amount effective tosblock, inhibit, and/or mitigate activation of TLR4. One aspectof the present invention therefore relates to a method of treat-Wing corneal inflammation by administering to a Subject a 35Otherapeutically effective amount of at least TLR4 antagonistlsto reduce and/or mitigate corneal inflammation in the Subject.-UIn one embodiment of the present invention, the TLR4antagonist used to treat corneal inflammation in the Subject isa compound of formula (I):40OOA2ONHR6OOR4R2where each U and V, independently, is straight or branchedC2 to C15 alkyl and W is hydrogen or straight or branched C1to C5 alkyl:R is R or R O CH , R being selected from the(I)RVAlgroup consisting of hydrogen, J', -J'-OH, -J'-O-K', -J'-O-NH45 K' OH, and -J'-O-PO(OH), where each J and K', independently, is straight or branched C1 to C5 alkyl:R is selected from the group consisting of hydroxy, halogen, C1 to C5alkoxy and C1 to C5 acyloxy;A' and A, independently, are selected from the group50 consisting of OH,where R' is selected from the group consisting sQ60z--ol. and O-Z-COHOHOOLus M-Q,l lsJKOO-Q -l lsJKOlOQsJKwhere Z is straight or branched C1 to C10 alkyl:or pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate ester65 thereof.In one embodiment, the TLR4 antagonist of formula (I) isa compound of formula (II):

US 9,006,210 ,O'N-1N1 (CH2)6CH3N OOCHor a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate esterthereof.2OIn another embodiment, the TLR4 antagonist of formula(II) is:OPO(OH)2CHOs(HO).OPO--Seatries--OOHOn 1 N-(CH2)6CHOOCHor a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate ester 40thereof.In another embodiment, the TLR4 antagonist is eritorantetrasodium (also known as compound E5664). Eritoran tetrasodium is the tetrasodium salt of the compound shown 45immediately above. Eritoran tetrasodium is described in U.S.Pat. No. 5,935,938.Other TLR4 antagonists, which can be used to treat asubject with corneal inflammation in methods of the presentinvention include the following compounds:O50OOOPO(OH)2OCHO(HO).OPOCH3(CH2)6N OH'NH OHYOO5“N ls(CH2)2CH3OQ-1-N-(CH2)6CH6065

US 9,006,210 B211or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof or phosphateester thereof (see U.S. Pat. App. No. 2007/0072824A1).Additional TLR4 antagonists that can be used in the invention include, for example, compound B531 (U.S. Pat. No.5.530,113), as well as other compounds described in thefollowing patents: U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,389 (e.g., substitutedliposaccharides identified by formula I); U.S. Pat. No. 5,612,476 (e.g., lipid A analogs disclosed at columns 2-41); U.S.Pat. No. 5,756,718 (lipid A analogs disclosed at columns2-40); U.S. Pat. No. 5,843.918 (e.g., lipid A analogs disclosedat columns 2-48): U.S. Pat. No. 5,750,664 (e.g., substitutedliposaccharides identified by formula I); U.S. Pat. No. 6,235,724 (e.g., lipid A analogs identified by formulas I and II); U.S.Pat. No. 6,184,366 (e.g., lipid A analogs identified by formulaI), U.S. Pat. No. 5,681,824, U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No.2003.014.4503A1, and U.S. Pat. App. Pub. No.20020028927A1. Methods for making these compounds are12OH(HO)P-OOOCO2HOONHHNOOO10OOOOO15also described within these documents. Additional methodsfor making Such compounds are described, for example, inWO O2/94O19.Still other examples of the TLR4 antagonists, which can beused to treat a Subject with corneal inflammation according tomethods of the present invention include compounds of formula (III):2530(III)OOH (HO)2P-OO-S orOONH35HNOOOOIn other embodiments, the TLR4 antagonist of formula(III) is a compound selected from one of the following:O(CH2)n ) odu, f ?igns (?ign) 0ICH,CHor a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate esterthereof. The above-identified TLR4 antagonist is commercially available from GlaxoSmithKline (UK) under the tradename CRX 526. (See Fort, Madeline M. et al. Journal ofImmunology, 174: 6416-6423 (2005)).(CH2)naCH40(CH2)ns) oIdH, (CH2)ngda,or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate esterthereof; wherein n, n, and ns are the same or different andare positive integers from, for example, 1 to about 10 (e.g.,10); n, n, and n are the same or different and are positiveintegers less than 8. Compounds of formula (III) are syntheticlipid A mimetics that do not stimulate cytokine production orother gene expression in human peripheral blood monocytesin vitro or induce an inflammatory response in vivo. (Stoveretal. (Journal of Biological Chemistry Vol. 27, No. 6)).In one example, at least one of n, n, and n is less than 7so that at least one secondary acyl group of formula (III) isless than 10 carbons. Compounds of formula (III) with at leastone secondary acyl group less than 10 carbons have beenshown to be potent TLR4 antagonists. (Stover et al. (Journalof Biological Chemistry Vol. 27, No. 6)).45OHO50OorSlotHNONHOOOO55OOOO6065In one embodiment, the TLR4 antagonist of formula (III)used in the present method has the following structure:(HO,-oO

US 9,006,210 B2-continued-continuedOHrSlot(HO) -oO(HO)P-OOHNNHCOHor N- 2OHNNHOOOOOOOOOO10O1525(HO-Oor pharmaceutically acceptable salts and phosphate estersthereof. The above identified examples of formula (III) areidentified by Stover et al. (Journal of Biological ChemistryVol. 27, No. 6) as being synthetic lipid A mimetics and weresynthesized as described in Johnson et al. Biorog. Med. Chem.Lett. 9, 2273-2278.30In some embodiments, the TLR4 antagonist is a compoundof formula (I):(I)3540RAOOOAlDCI C.iR'iR'where R' is selected from the group consisting of:45OH(HO-O50-ls, N-1s, Sls,tOsus,where each J, K, and Q, independently, is straight orbranched C1 to C15 alkyl:55R’ is straight or branched C5 to C15 alkyl:R is selected from the group consisting of straight orbranched C5 to C18 acyl andO6065lA-CH CH-B,where A and B are each independently straight or branchedC1 to C15 alkyl:R" is selected from the group consisting of straight orbranched C4 to C20 alkyl, and

US 9,006,210 B216OOHsusJwhere each Uand V, independently, is straight or branchedC2 to C15 alkyl and W is hydrogen or straight orbranched C1 to C5 alkyl:K,where J is —CH2—and K is straight or branched C10 to C13alkyl. In other embodiments, R' is10R is R O CH , R being selected from the groupconsisting of hydrogen, J', -J'-OH, -J'-O-K', -J'-OK OH, and -J'-O-PO(OH), where each J and K",independently, is straight or branched C1 to C5 alkyl;R is selected from the group consisting of hydroxy, haloOJ15lsK,gen, C1 to C5alkoxy and C1 to C5 acyloxy;A' and A are each independentlywhere J is —CH2—, K is straight or branched C10 to C13alkyl and Q is straight or branched —CH. In further embodiments, R isOl,OH25or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate esterthereof.where J is —CH2—and K is straight or branched C10 to C13alkyl.In some embodiments, R is30In some embodiments, R is straight or branched C8 to C12ments, R is straight or branched C10 to C18 acyl, e.g., C18acyl. In other embodiments, R isalkyl, e.g., straight or branched C10 alkyl. In some embodis35where J is straight or branched C10 to C15 alkyl.OIn other embodiments, R' islOHls,where J is straight or branched C1 to C3 alkyl and K is straightwhere A is straight or branched C7 to C12 alkyl and B isstraight or branched C4 to C9 alkyl. For example, in someembodiments, R is45or branched C8 to C15 alkyl. In still other embodiments, R' isOlsOlJA-CH CH-B,40A-CH CH-B,50where A is straight or branched C9 alkyl and B is straight orbranched C6 alkyl.K,where J is straight or branched C1 to C3 alkyl, K is straight orbranched C8 to C15 alkyl and Q is straight or branched C1 to55C3 alkyl. In further embodiments, R' isl,where J is straight or branched C1 to C3 alkyl and K is straightor branched C8 to C15 alkyl.For example, in some embodiments, R' isIn some embodiments, R is straight or branched C8 to C12ments, R isalkyl, e.g., straight or branched C10 alkyl. In other embodi6065where U is straight or branched C2 to C4alkyl, V is straightor branched C5 to C9 alkyl and W is hydrogen or —CH. Forexample, in some embodiments, R is

US 9,006,210 B218OOHor pharmaceutically acceptable salt or phosphate esterwhere U is straight or branched C2 alkyl, V is straight orbranched C7 alkyl and W is hydrogen or —CH.In some embodiments, R is R O CH , where R isembodiments, R is R O CH , where R is —CHs.In some embodiments, R is hydroxyl.thereof.10J'and where J is straight or branched C1 to C5 alkyl. In someIn further embodiments, the TLR4 antagonist is a compound of formula (I):RAOOOIn still further embodiments, the TLR4 antagonist is acompound of formula (I):(I)RAA2II. R' OCI hOA2t R6*R4 R'HR2R'25l,30--Alwhere R iswhere R' is selected fromOO15(I)AlOSls,OH-l,where J is straight or branched C1 to C3 alkyl, K is straightor branched C8 to C15 alkyl and Q is straight orbranched C1 to C3 alkyl;R’ is straight or branched C8 to C12 alkyl35R iswhere J is straight or branched C1 to C3 alkyl, K is straightor branched C8 to C15 alkyl and Q is straight orbranched C1 to C3 alkyl;R’ is straight or branched C8 to C12 alkylOl40A-CH CH-B,R iswhere A is straight or branched C7 to C12 alkyland B isstraight or branched C4 to C9 alkylR isOl45A-CH CH-B,where A is straight or branched C7 to C12 alkyl and B isstraight or branched C4 to C9 alkyl50R is selected from straight or branched C8 to C12 alkylandwhere U is straight or branched C2 to C4alkyl, V is straightor branched C5 to C9 alkyl and W is hydrogen or—CH:55R is R O CH , where R is J and where J isstraight o

contact lens wear. In addition to infectious keratitis, contact lens wear is also associated with sterile, culture-negative clinical manifesta tions, including contact lens associated red eye (CLARE). contact lens peripheral ulcers (CLPU), and contact lens asso ciated corneal infiltrates CLACI (Stapleton et al., Optom Vis Sci. 2007; 84:257-272).

Related Documents:

Australian Patent No. 692929 Australian Patent No. 708311 Australian Patent No. 709987 Australian Patent No. 710420 Australian Patent No. 711699 Australian Patent No. 712238 Australian Patent No. 728154 Australian Patent No. 731197 PATENTED NO. EP0752134 PATENTED NO.

United States Patent [191 Schaefer US00570 1 006A Patent Number: 5,701,006 Dec. 23, 1997 [11] [45] Date of Patent: METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEASURING DISTANCES USING FIBER

US007039530B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent N0.:US 7 9 039 9 530 B2 Bailey et al. (45) Date of Patent: May 2, 2006 (Us) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS (73) Asslgnee. ' . Ashcroft Inc., Stratford, CT (US) EP EP 0 1 621 059 462 516 A2 A1 10/1994 12/2000

USOO6039279A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,039,279 Datcuk, Jr. et al. (45) Date of Patent: Mar. 21, 2000 FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS

United States Patent [191 4,686,605 United States Patent [191 Eastlund [11] Patent Number: [45] Date of Patent: 4,686,605 Aug. 11, 1987 [54] METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ALTERING A REGION IN THE EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE, IONOSPHERE, AND/ OR MAGNETOSPHERE [75] Inventor: Bernard J. Eastlund, Spring, Tex.

Book indicating when the patent was listed PTAB manually identified biologic patents as any patent potentially covering a Purple Book-listed product and any non-Orange Book-listed patent directed to treating a disease or condition The litigation referenced in this study is limited to litigation that the parties to a

(12) United States Design Patent (10) Patent N0.2 Metros et al. USO0D493552S1 US D493,552 s (45) Date of Patent: ** Jul. 27, 2004 (54) VEHICLE HEADLAMP

(12) United States Patent Luft USOO771.9995B2 (10) Patent No.: US 7,719,995 B2 (45) Date of Patent: May 18, 2010 (54) APPLICATION DRIVEN FAST UNICAST