CONCISE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Chapter 296-809 WAC Safety Standards For .

1y ago
204 Views
1 Downloads
606.93 KB
9 Pages
Last View : 2d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ronan Garica
Transcription

CONCISE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Chapter 296-809 WAC Safety Standards for Confined Spaces Public Hearing: October 30, 2017 Adoption: January 2, 2018 Effective Date: February 5, 2018 Table of Contents 1 I. Purpose of Rulemaking . [page 2] A. Background B. Summary of the Rulemaking Activities II. Changes to the Rules . [page 2] III. Summary of Comments Received and Department Response . [page 4]

I. Purpose of Rulemaking This rulemaking is in response to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA’s) final rule for Confined Spaces in construction (29 CFR 1926) published in the Federal Register on May 4, 2015 becoming effective on August 4, 2015. The department is required to update their rules to be at least as effective as OSHA. A. Background The Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) has had a Confined Spaces rule (chapter 296-809 WAC) that applied to both General Industry and Construction as one rule for several years. OSHA had a confined space rule for general industry but not construction until August 2015. L&I updated their confined spaces rule as necessary based on OSHA’s updates. Any changes made by OSHA to the construction rule were updated in the departments rule for both general industry and construction. Since the basic requirements for confined spaces are the same regardless of the industry L&I believed it was better to leave the rule intact as one rule and to apply the new requirements to general industry as well as construction to eliminate confusion. B. Summary of the rulemaking activities L&I held four stakeholder meetings in late 2016 and early 2017 to gather input on the proposed changes. In addition drafts of the proposal were sent out to a stakeholder list that was generated from sending notices to the listserv for standards and construction. II. Changes to the Rules (Proposed rule versus rule adopted) WAC 296-809-099 Definitions. Replaced reference to Appendix G – Sewer System Information to the correct Appendix J – Alternative Methods Documentation in definition of Alternative Methods. Also clarified that Appendix J could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule. Clarified that Appendix A – Frequently Asked Questions could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule in the definition of Confined Space. Replaced the word OSHA with DOSH in the note for the definition of Entry Employer. Added a footnote number 1 in the text that was inadvertently left out in the definition of Hazardous Atmosphere. 2

Replaced (5) with the correct symbol (%) in the definition of Hazardous Atmosphere. Clarified that Appendix B – Examples of Permit-Required confined Space Hazards could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined space rule in the definition of Permit-Required Confined space. WAC 296-809-100 Scope Clarified that Appendix C – Rules in Other Chapters that Cover Confined Spaces could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule. WAC 296-809-20002 Identify permit-required confined spaces Clarified that Appendix A – Frequently Asked Questions and Appendix B- Examples of Permit-Required Confined Space Hazards could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule. WAC 296-809-20004 Inform employees and control entry to permit-required confined spaces. Added and corrected footnotes. WAC 296-809-30002 Develop a written permit-required confined space program. Replaced incorrect reference to Appendix I - Atmospheric Testing Procedures to the correct Appendix J – Alternative Methods Documentation. Also clarified that Appendix J – Alternative Methods Documentation could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule. WAC 296-809-50014 Make sure you have adequate rescue and emergency services available Clarified that Appendix H – Evaluating Rescue Teams or Services could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule. WAC 296-809-50018 Make sure the entrants know the hazardous conditions and their duties. Added the word “ensure” to clarify the entry supervisors’ role. WAC 296-809-60002 Make sure the following conditions are met if using alternative methods. Added footnote number 2 in the text of the rule to reference the correct note. Added footnote number 3 in the text of the rule to reference the correct note. Added a sentence #2 in the note to provide additional clarification. Changed #2 in the note to #3 to accommodate the new sentence. Added a reference to Appendix J – Alternative Methods Documentation Form. Also clarified that Appendix J – Alternative Methods Documentation could be found by going to the labor and industries web site by using the provided link to the Confined Space rule. 3

III. Summary of Comments Received and Department Response Comments WAC 296-809-200 Scope Almost every crawlspace or attic that would be entered by a public or private inspector meet the three qualifications as listed in the rules as a “Confined Space” which complicates the ability for a single independent inspector to properly perform an inspection of a crawlspace or attic. There are obvious hazards in the crawlspace and attic by their very nature of construction where they meet the three criteria for the definition of a confined space. If I am reading the criteria established in the rules this would then make all entry to crawlspaces and attics a permit required confined space that would require additional paperwork, forms and in some cases a second person to attend the entry of the spaces. There is no clarification or exemption established on the ability to enter a crawlspace or attic to perform an inspection without meeting the criteria of these rules for a permit required confined space. This leaves the person entering the spaces and their employer subject to interpretation of an 4 Department Response Thank you for your comments. OSHA does not have an exception or an exemption for attics, crawlspaces or basements in residential housing. Allowing this exception for attics, crawlspaces, or basements that meet the definition of confined space would cause the Department to be not as effective as OSHA. DOSH believes that this exception is not necessary because the identification of confined space and permit required confined space has not changed. The following excerpts from OSHA’s responses to questions, FAQ’s and letters of interpretation regarding attics, crawlspaces or basements are as follows: In an OSHA interpretation regarding attics as confined spaces OSHA stated that “If an attic space in your building fits the definition of a confined space, then attics are confined spaces. However, attic spaces that are determined to be confined spaces should generally fall into the category of non-permit confined spaces because they have either natural or mechanical ventilation which would prevent accumulation of hazardous atmosphere and because other hazards would not normally be present. “ Spaces in a residential home may be considered confined spaces or permit-required confined spaces during the construction or remodeling process. However, the vast majority of the standard’s requirements only apply to permit-required confined spaces, and attics, basements, and crawl spaces in a residential home — three common spaces – will not typically trigger these requirements. In many instances, an attic will not be considered a confined space because there is not limited or restricted means for entry and exit. For example, an attic that can be accessed via pull down stairs that resemble the structure of a stationary stairway and do not require an employee to ascend /descend hand-over-hand would not be considered a confined space if there are no impediments to egress. Attics that are determined to be confined spaces would generally not be permitrequired confined spaces because they typically do not contain the types of hazards or

Labor and Industries enforcement person. I would request that clarification be made to allow for an exception or exemption to the permit requirements for residential (type R buildings as defined by the International Residential Code as adopted by the State of Washington) crawlspaces and attics to allow for the current inspection processes to continue. The exceptions are exemptions could contain certain criteria that would still require a permit. The issue that is still outstanding if the above requested exemption is allowed is how this would apply to persons doing application of pest control chemicals and if this would then be regulated as a permit required confined space. potential hazards that make a confined space a permit-required confined space (those that could impair an entrant’s ability to exist the space without assistance). However, extreme heat in an attic can be considered a serious physical hazard such that the attic could be considered permit-required confined space. OSHA has not quantified how hot it must be to trigger the permit-required confined spaces requirements. However, heat that is extreme enough to cause heat exhaustion (e.g., dizziness, headaches, severe sweating, and cramps) may impede an entrant’s ability to exit the attic without assistance and would make a confined space permit-required. Additionally OSHA has published an “OSHA Fact Sheet” titled “Confined spaces in Residential Construction” as part of their outreach to the Construction industry after their Confined Spaces in Construction rule was published. OSHA describes this document as follows: “OSHA has developed a standard for Confined Spaces in Construction (29 CFR 1926 Subpart AA) that applies to spaces such as attics, basements, and crawl spaces. This Fact Sheet, developed after consultation with the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), and a detailed Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) document, clarify some of the standard’s provisions and their application to residential construction work.” See link: https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3914.pdf https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show document?p table INTERPRETATIONS& p id 21990 https://www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/faq.html DOSH will be publish their own Frequently Asked Questions document incorporating these issues regarding attics, basements and crawl spaces. Although the definition of confined space has not significantly changed, the Washington State Department of Labor and Industry’s (L&I) emphasis in the last several years on enforcement and issuing citations has changed. Participants at the October 30th public meeting in Olympia were 5 Thank you for your comments. OSHA does not have an exception or an exemption for attics, crawlspaces or basements in residential housing. Allowing this exception for attics, crawlspaces, or basements that meet the definition of confined space would cause the Department to be not as effective as OSHA. DOSH believes that this exception is not necessary because the identification of confined space and permit required confined space has not changed. The following excerpts from OSHA’s responses to questions, FAQ’s and letters of interpretation regarding attics, crawlspaces or basements are as follows:

told that if a contractor hadn’t been required to comply with confined space rules in the past, they “probably” won’t be required to do anything different now. The fines issued for safety violations are steep. Business owners who will be required to follow these rules and ensure their employees do as well, deserve more than a “probably”. Simply defining (some) attics and (some) crawlspaces as examples of confined spaces (Appendix A) without offering guidance or examples of what (some) means, does not keep the playing field level. One compliance person misinterpreting the intent of the rule could financially harm an appraiser, home inspector, pest control or similar occupation that would enter these types of spaces in residential settings. Federally, OSHA agreed to clarify the confined space rule as it deals with attics and crawl spaces in a Frequently Asked Questions document1. That publication made it clear that the vast majority of the confined space rule’s requirements only apply to permit- 6 In an OSHA interpretation regarding attics as confined spaces OSHA stated that “If an attic space in your building fits the definition of a confined space, then attics are confined spaces. However, attic spaces that are determined to be confined spaces should generally fall into the category of non-permit confined spaces because they have either natural or mechanical ventilation which would prevent accumulation of hazardous atmosphere and because other hazards would not normally be present. “ Spaces in a residential home may be considered confined spaces or permit-required confined spaces during the construction or remodeling process. However, the vast majority of the standard’s requirements only apply to permit-required confined spaces, and attics, basements, and crawl spaces in a residential home — three common spaces – will not typically trigger these requirements. In many instances, an attic will not be considered a confined space because there is not limited or restricted means for entry and exit. For example, an attic that can be accessed via pull down stairs that resemble the structure of a stationary stairway and do not require an employee to ascend /descend hand-over-hand would not be considered a confined space if there are no impediments to egress. Attics that are determined to be confined spaces would generally not be permitrequired confined spaces because they typically do not contain the types of hazards or potential hazards that make a confined space a permit-required confined space (those that could impair an entrant’s ability to exist the space without assistance). However, extreme heat in an attic can be considered a serious physical hazard such that the attic could be considered permit-required confined space. OSHA has not quantified how hot it must be to trigger the permit-required confined spaces requirements. However, heat that is extreme enough to cause heat exhaustion (e.g., dizziness, headaches, severe sweating, and cramps) may impede an entrant’s ability to exit the attic without assistance and would make a confined space permit-required. Additionally OSHA has published an “OSHA Fact Sheet” titled “Confined spaces in Residential Construction” as part of their outreach to the Construction industry after their Confined

required confined spaces and attics. Basements and crawl spaces in a residential home will not typically trigger these requirements in the rule. BIAW urges L&I, through the Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act (WISHA), to adopt OSHA’s position on entering an attic or crawlspace. These spaces will generally not be permit-required confined spaces. They typically do not contain the types of hazards or potential hazards that make a confined space a permit-required confined space. Although we understand the rule didn’t technically change the definition as far as what confined spaces are, what we’re worried about is that enforcement will. And we’ve said this from the beginning that you can take any adequate crawl space with these definitions and your field staff can say it’s in a confined space or, I guess, anybody can. But, anyway that’s what our concern is, is that if enforcement changes, our practice is going to have to change or people could end up having to hire another person to join them on job sites, which would increase their cost of business. 7 Spaces in Construction rule was published. OSHA describes this document as follows: “OSHA has developed a standard for Confined Spaces in Construction (29 CFR 1926 Subpart AA) that applies to spaces such as attics, basements, and crawl spaces. This Fact Sheet, developed after consultation with the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), and a detailed Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) document, clarify some of the standard’s provisions and their application to residential construction work.” See link: https://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA3914.pdf https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show document?p table INTERPRETATIONS& p id 21990 https://www.osha.gov/confinedspaces/faq.html DOSH will be publish their own Frequently Asked Questions document incorporating these issues regarding attics, basements and crawl spaces.

WAC 296-809-60002(b) In reviewing the new proposed confined space rule, I’ve come up with a question regarding entering a confined space using alternative methods. 29 CFR 1910.146: Alternate entry procedures may be used to enter a permit space when the only hazard present is an atmospheric hazard which can be controlled through continuous forced air ventilation. A permit space may be reclassified as a non-permit confined space if poses no actual or potential atmospheric hazard and all hazards in the space are eliminated without entry. It appears that these two entry methods have been combined in the new state confined space rule into the alternative methods section (WAC 296-809-600). Specifically, WAC 296809-60002(b) states that alternative methods may be used if “You have eliminated all of the physical hazards, and continuous forced air ventilation controls the actual or potential hazardous atmosphere.” The way I read this, you can have both a physical hazard and atmospheric hazard in a space, yet still enter using alternative methods. To me this seems at odds 8 Thank you for your comments. The requirement regarding hazard elimination WAC 296-809-60002 state the employer must meet the following conditions to use this section. One, either all the hazards must be eliminated (effectively equivalent to a non-permit confined space). Or two, the physical hazards must be eliminated and a potential for a hazardous atmosphere must be managed with effective forced air-ventilation and the employer must have atmospheric testing data to support that they have made the confined space safe for entry (alternate entry). DOSH combined nonpermit entry with the alternative methods requirements. Although the term nonpermit is not used in the updated alternative methods section, the requirement that there are no atmospheric or physical hazards in the space to qualify as a nonpermit now exists as one of the conditions for alternative methods to be used. Alternative methods requires that the employer has monitoring and inspection data that supports either (1) You have eliminated all the hazards (formerly called nonpermit) or (2) You have eliminated all of the physical hazards and continuous forced air ventilation controls the actual or potential hazardous atmosphere We believe the requirements are as effective as the OSHA standard.

with the federal OSHA standard in which a space with both a physical hazard and actual/potential atmospheric hazard is a permitrequired confined space and not eligible for alternate entry procedures or reclassification. Can you help me understand how the new proposed state rule is at least as effective as the federal standard when in fact it seems to be more lenient in allowing alternative methods? 9

Spaces in a residential home may be considered confined spaces or permit-required confined spaces during the construction or remodeling process. However, the vast majority of the standard's requirements only apply to permit-required confined spaces, and attics, basements, and crawl spaces in a residential home — three common spaces - will .

Related Documents:

Part J Stairways. WAC 296-155-475 through 296-155-477 Part L Cranes, Rigging, and Personnel Lifting. WAC 296-155-529 through 296-155-56435 Part M Motor Vehicles, Mechanized Equipment, and Marine Operations. WAC 296-155-600 through 296-155-630 Part N Excavation, Tren

Bipolar disorder ICD-9-CM Code ICD-10-CM Code Diagnosis 296.40 F31.0 Current episode hypomanic Current episode manic 296.41 F31.11 Mild 296.42 F31.12 Moderate 296.43 F31.13 Severe without psychotic features 296.44 F31.2 Severe with psychotic features 296.45 F31.73 In partial remission 296.46 F31.74 In full remission Current ep

Part One: Heir of Ash Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18 Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 Chapter 24 Chapter 25 Chapter 26 Chapter 27 Chapter 28 Chapter 29 Chapter 30 .

TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. Contents Dedication Epigraph Part One Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Part Two Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18. Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 Chapter 24 Chapter 25 Chapter 26

DEDICATION PART ONE Chapter 1 Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5 Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9 Chapter 10 Chapter 11 PART TWO Chapter 12 Chapter 13 Chapter 14 Chapter 15 Chapter 16 Chapter 17 Chapter 18 Chapter 19 Chapter 20 Chapter 21 Chapter 22 Chapter 23 .

Mandy Weeks Decl. EXHIBIT 1 Concise Explanatory Statement Network Access Rulemaking R-2013-22 . CONCISE EXPLANATORY STATEMENT NETWORK ACCESS RULEMAKING R-2013-22 OfTice of the Insurance Commissioner April 25, 2014 Page 1 of 84 OIC EXHIBIT 1 - Page 1 of 95. TABLE OF CONTENTS

INSURANCE COMMISSIONER WASHINGTON STATE Health plan coverage of reproductive healthcare and contraception (R 2018-10) (R 2019-07) Concise Explanatory Statement; Responsiveness Summary, Rule Development Process and Implementation Plan November 27, 2019 Mike Kreidler, Insurance Commissioner www.insurance.wa.gov

meetings or other activities may contact Dolores Noyes by phone (360-902-2349), TDD (360-902-2207), or by email at . dolores.noyes@dfw.wa.gov . For more information, see . Concise Explanatory Statement - ESHB 1261 HPA Rule Making Page 6 WDFW proposes changes to WAC 220-660 to align it with RCWs implemented via ESHB 1261.