Manual Handling Assessment Charts (the MAC Tool)

3y ago
43 Views
2 Downloads
1.16 MB
20 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aiyana Dorn
Transcription

Health and SafetyExecutiveManual handling assessmentcharts (the MAC tool)IntroductionWork-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), including manual handling injuries,are the most common type of occupational ill health in the UK. It is important toremember that: This is a web-friendlyversion of leafletINDG383(rev3),published 11/18there is a lot you can do to prevent them;preventative measures are often simple and cost-effective;you cannot prevent all MSDs, but where they occur, early reporting ofsymptoms, proper treatment and suitable rehabilitation are essential.The Manual Handling Assessment Charts (MAC) is a tool aimed at employers,health and safety managers and safety representatives and is used by health andsafety inspectors. The tool will help you assess the most common risk factors inlifting (and lowering), carrying and team handling operations and was developed toidentify high-risk manual handling. It will point you towards the factors you need tomodify to control these risks.What does the law say?The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 set out a clear hierarchy ofmeasures for dealing with risk likely to cause harm from manual handling. These are: avoid hazardous manual handling operations so far as reasonably practicable;assess any manual handling operations that cannot be avoided;reduce the risk of injury to as low as reasonably practicable.Structure of the MACThere are three types of assessment that can be carried out with the MAC: lifting operations (pages 3-7);carrying operations (pages 8-12);team handling operations (pages 13-17).For each type of assessment there is an assessment guide and a flow chart.There is a score sheet to complete at the end of the tool.When not to use the MACUsing the MAC is not appropriate for: manual handling operations involving pushing and pulling (see the RiskAssessment of Pushing and Pulling (RAPP) Tool¹);assessing people handling (see HOP6 The guide to the handling of people:A systems approach²);assessing workplace risks associated with upper limb disorders (seeAssessment of Repetitive Tasks of the upper limbs (the ART tool)³).Page 1 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveHow to complete a MAC assessmentNote: Using the MAC may not comprise a ‘suitable and sufficient’ riskassessment. You may need to do a full risk assessment when certain conditionsapply. Before you start your MAC assessment, look at the checklist on thescore sheet to see if any of them apply to you. The Appendix of Manual handling(L23)4 explains this in more detail.G GREEN - Low level of risk Although the risk is low, consider the exposurelevels for vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, disabled, recently injured,young or inexperienced workers.A AMBER - Medium level of risk Examine tasks closely.R RED - High level of risk Prompt action needed. This may expose asignificant proportion of the working population to risk of injury.P PURPLE - Unacceptable level of risk Such operations may represent aserious risk of injury and must be improved. Identify the tasks to assess. Choose the ones that you know are hard work orthat employees complain about.Consult employees and their representatives on the manual handling risksfrom their work and ways to manage and/or control these risks. SeeINDG2325 for more information. Aim to gain insight into the demands of thejob from the perspectives of all employees carrying out the task.Observe the task carefully (videoing may help) and make sure that you look athow it is normally done.Select the appropriate type of assessment (lifting, carrying or team handling).If a task involves lifting and carrying, consider both.Follow the appropriate assessment guide and flow chart to determine thelevel of risk for each risk factor. Always assess the worst-case scenario ifunsure.Enter the colour bands and numerical scores on the score sheet and usethem to identify which risk factors need to be examined and the total level ofexposure to risk.An interactive score sheet is at www.hse.gov.uk/msd/mac/scoresheet.htm.Look for ways of modifying the task to reduce the red risk factors to amber orgreen and to reduce amber risk factors to green.If the individual does a number of tasks, assess each one separately.Prioritise action by addressing the task with the highest total score first. Thetotal scores do not relate to specific action levels.Look at www.hse.gov.uk/msd/mac for further guidance on using this tool.Remember: The purpose of the assessment is to identify and then reduce theoverall level of risk of the task. You need to put measures in place to control therisks you have identified. There is space to list your control measures onthe score sheet.Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)Page 2 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveLifting operations assessment guideA Load weight/frequencyNote the weight of the load and the frequency (or repetition rate) of the liftingoperation. Read the risk band from the graph below and enter the colour band andnumerical score onto the score sheet.If the colour band is purple you should examine the task very closely as it mayrepresent a serious risk of injury and must be improved.Load weight/frequency graph for lifting operationsP 1050Weight of load (kg)405040R 63030A 420102010G 000One lift perday30 minutes(2)5 minutes(12)2 minutes(30)1 minute(60)14 seconds(250)9 seconds(400)5 seconds(720)One lift every (lifts per hour)To assess lifting at more than once every five seconds you should carry out a fullrisk assessment.Repetitive handling of light items will fall within the green zone, but may beassociated with upper limb problems. For advice on assessing these tasks seeUpper limb disorders in the workplace6 and the ART tool.When a job is complex because load weights vary significantly (eg in order picking/distribution) you can use the Variable manual handling assessment chart (V-MAC)tool7 to assess the load weight/frequency risk factor instead of this graph, beforereturning to complete your MAC assessment.Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)Page 3 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveLifting operations assessment guideB Hand distance from the lower backObserve the horizontal distance between the worker’s hands and lower back.You should assess the ‘worst-case scenario’, including picking up and puttingdown. Use the following illustrations and descriptions as a guide:Upper arms vertical ANDtorso uprightUpper arms angledaway from torsoHands close tothe low backHands at moderatedistance from the low backG/0Torso bentforwardA/3Torso upright.Arms fullyoutstretchedUpper arms angledaway from torso ANDtorso bent forwardHands far from the low backR/6C Vertical lift zonesObserve the vertical position of the worker’s hands at both the start and end of thelift. Record the ‘worst-case’ colour band/score. Use the following illustrations anddescriptions as a guide:Handsbetweenknee andelbowheightG/0Hands betweenknee and floorlevelHandsbetweenelbowheight andhead heightManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Hands at floor levelor belowHands athead heightor aboveR/3Page 4 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveLifting operations assessment guideD Torso twisting and sideways bendingObserve the worker’s torso as the load is lifted. If the person twists the torso inrelation to the hips OR leans to one side as the load is lifted, the colour band isamber and the score is 1. If the torso both twists AND bends to the side as theload is lifted, the colour band is red and the score is 2.Little or notorso twistingor sidewaysbendingTorso twistedG/0Torso bentsidewaysA/1Torso bothtwisted ANDbent sidewaysR/2E Postural constraintsLook for factors that force workers to modify their postures. If their movementsare restricted when lifting because of the space available (eg lifting in a narrowaisle or in a crowded or disorganised storage area) or lifting through narrow gaps,the colour band is amber and the score is 1. If the posture is severely restricted(eg lifting in an area with a low ceiling) the colour band is red and the score is 3.No postural constraintsG/0Restricted postureManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Severely restrictedpostureR/3Page 5 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveLifting operations assessment guideF Grip on the loadLook at the quality of the grip that the worker can use to get hold of and controlthe load. The worker may need to reposition their hands on the object as a liftprogresses. If this is so, assess the ‘worst-case scenario’.Fit-for-purpose handles/handholds matched tothe size and weight ofthe loadHandles or handholdstoo small or lack fingerclearance or only thefingers support the loadNo handles or handholdareasRough, slippery orwith pressure pointsCylindrical handles oritems the whole hand canwrap round comfortablyNo handles or handholdsbut can be heldunderneath, or has strapor loop handlesPalm, pinch or fingertipgrip or force used tokeep items togetherIrregular, bulky ornon-rigidGood gripG/0ReasonablegripA/1R/2Poor gripG Floor surfaceLook at the condition of the floor where the handling task takes place. Note that foroutdoor work this will depend on the weather. Always assess the ‘worst-case scenario’.Non-slip, dry, clean, firm, leveland undamagedGood floor surfaceG/0Mostly dry and clean (damp orsome debris), OR reasonably firmOR minor damageReasonable floor surfaceA/1Slippery (greasy, oily, wet, icy) ORmuch debris OR soft OR unstableOR severe damagePoor floor surfaceR/2H Environmental factorsObserve the work environment and score if the handling operation takes place:in extremes of temperature; with strong air movements; or in extreme lightingconditions (dark, bright or poor contrast). If one of the risk factors is presentscore 1, if two or more of the risk factors are present score 2.No factorsG/0One factorManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Two or more factorsR/2Page 6 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveLifting operations flowchartSTARTA Load weight/frequencyB Handdistance fromthe lowerbackC Vertical liftzonesD Torso twistingand sidewaysbendingInsert the colours and numericalscores on the score sheet and identifyand implement suitable control measuresSee graph on p3G/0See graph on p3A/4See graph on p3R/650 kg or moreP/10Hands close tothe low backG/0Hands at moderatedistance from thelow backA/3Hands far fromthe low backR/6Hands betweenknee and elbowheightG/0Hands betweenknee and floor levelA/Hands betweenelbow height andhead heightA/Hands at floor levelor belowR/3Hands at headheight or aboveR/3Little or no torsotwisting or sidewaysbendingG/0Torso twistedA/1Torso bentsidewaysA/1Torso both twistedAND bent sidewaysR/2Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)HEnvironmentalfactorsG FloorsurfaceF Grip onthe loadE PosturalconstraintsNo factorsG/0One factorA/1Two or more factorsR/2Good floor surfaceG/0Reasonable floorsurfaceA/1Poor floor surfaceR/2Good gripG/0Reasonable gripA/1Poor gripR/2No posturalconstraintsG/0Restricted postureA/1Severely restrictedpostureR/3Page 7 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveCarrying operations assessment guideA Load weight/frequencyNote the weight of the load and the frequency (or repetition rate) of the carryingoperation. Read the risk band from the graph below and enter the colour band andnumerical score onto the score sheet.If the colour band is purple you should examine the task very closely as it mayrepresent a serious risk of injury and must be improved.Load weight/frequency graph for carrying operationsP 1050Weight of load (kg)405040R 63030A 420102010G 000One carryper day30 minutes(2)5 minutes(12)2 minutes(30)1 minute(60)12 seconds(300)One carry every (carries per hour)To assess carrying at more than once every 12 seconds you should carry out a fullrisk assessment.As the V-MAC7 takes account of carrying distance, when a job is complex becauseload weights vary significantly (eg in order picking/distribution) you can use it toassess the load weight/frequency risk factor instead of this graph, before returningto complete your MAC assessment.Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)Page 8 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveCarrying operations assessment guideB Hand distance from the lower backObserve the horizontal distance between the worker’s hands and lower back. Youshould assess the ‘worst-case scenario’, including the start and finish of the task.Use the following illustrations and descriptions as a guide:Upper arms verticalAND torso uprightHands close tothe low backUpper arms angledaway from torsoG/0Torso bent forwardHands at moderate distance from thelow backUpper arms angledaway from torso ANDtorso bent forwardA/3Hands far fromthe low backR/6C Asymmetrical torso or loadWhen carrying, the posture of the worker’s torso and the position of the load arerisk factors associated with musculoskeletal injury. Use the following illustrationsand descriptions as a guide:Load ANDhandssymmetricalin front of thetorsoG/0Torso symmetricalbut load is carriedto one sideLoad notsymmetricalA/1Two-handedcarrying to thesideR/2D Postural constraintsLook for factors that force workers to modify their postures. If their movements arerestricted during the carry (eg a narrow doorway forces the worker to turn or movethe load to get through) the colour band is amber and the score is 1. If the postureis severely restricted (eg having to bend forward to carry in an area with a lowceiling), the colour band is red and the score is 3.No postural constraintsG/0Restricted postureManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Severely restrictedpostureR/3Page 9 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveCarrying operations assessment guideE Grip on the loadLook at the quality of the grip that the worker can use to get hold of and controlthe load. The worker may need to reposition their hands on the object as a liftprogresses. If this is so, assess the ‘worst-case scenario’.Fit-for-purpose handles/handholds matched tothe size and weight ofthe loadHandles or handholdstoo small or lack fingerclearance or only thefingers support the loadNo handles or handholdareasRough, slippery orwith pressure pointsCylindrical handles oritems the whole hand canwrap round comfortablyNo handles or handholdsbut can be heldunderneath, or has strapor loop handlesPalm, pinch or fingertipgrip or force used tokeep items togetherIrregular, bulky ornon-rigidGood gripG/0ReasonablegripA/1R/2Poor gripF Floor surfaceExamine the condition of the floor at the locations where the handling task occurs.Note that for outdoor work this will depend on the weather. Always assess the‘worst-case scenario’.Non-slip, dry, clean, firm, leveland undamagedGood floor surfaceG/0Mostly dry and clean (damp orsome debris), OR reasonably firmOR minor damageReasonable floor surfaceA/1Slippery (greasy, oily, wet, icy) ORdebris in several areas OR soft ORunstable OR severe damagePoor floor surfaceR/3G Carry distanceObserve the task and estimate the total distance that the load is carried (not thedistance ‘as the crow flies’).Between 2 m and 4 mG/0Between 4 m and 10 mManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Over 10 mR/2Page 10 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveCarrying operations assessment guideH Obstacles on routeCount the number of different types of obstacle along the carrying route. If theperson has to carry the load up or down a steep slope, up or down steps, throughclosed doors/narrow doorways or around tripping hazards or round bends andcorners, the colour band is amber and the score is 2. If the task involves carryingitems up ladders or past two or more obstacles, the colour band is red and thescore is 3.No obstacles AND carryroute flat or slopes gentlyG/0One type of obstacle ORsteep slopeA/2Ladders OR at least twotypes of obstacleR/3I Environmental factorsObserve the work environment and score if the carrying operation takes place:in extremes of temperature; with strong air movements; or in extreme lightingconditions (dark, bright or poor contrast). If one of the risk factors is presentscore 1, if two or more of the risk factors are present score 2.No factorsG/0One factorManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Two or more factorsR/2Page 11 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveCarrying operations flowchartInsert the colours and numerical scores on thescore sheet and identify and implementsuitable control measuresSTARTA Load weight/frequencyB Handdistance fromthe lowerbackCAsymmetricaltorso or loadSee graph on p8G/0See graph on p8A/4See graph on p8R/650 kg or moreP/10Hands close tothe low backG/0Hands at moderatedistance from thelow backA/3Hands far fromthe low backR/6Load AND handssymmetrical in frontof the torsoG/0Torso symmetricalbut load is carriedto one side OR loadnot symmetricalA/1Two-handedcarrying to the sideR/2IEnvironmentalfactorsHObstacleson routeG CarrydistanceD PosturalconstraintsE Grip on theloadNo posturalconstraintsG/0Restricted postureA/1Severely restrictedpostureR/3Good gripG/0Reasonable gripA/1Poor gripR/2Manual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)F FloorsurfaceNo factorsG/0One factorA/1Two or more factorsR/2No obstacles ANDcarry route flat orslopes gentlyG/0One type ofobstacle OR steepslopeA/2Ladders OR at leasttwo types ofobstacleR/3Between 2 mand 4 mG/0Between 4 mand 10 mA/1Over 10 mR/2Good floor surfaceG/0Reasonable floorsurfaceA/1Poor floor surfaceR/3Page 12 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveTeam handling operations assessment guideA Load weightNote the weight of the load and the number of workers performing the task. Enterthe colour band and numerical score on the score sheet. For teams of five peopleor more, a full risk assessment is needed. If the colour band is purple you shouldexamine the task very closely as it may represent a serious risk of injury and mustbe improved.2 people 35 kg3 people 55 kg4 people 75 kg2 people 35–65 kg3 people 55–95 kg4 people 75–130 kgG/02 people 65–85 kg3 people 95–130 kg4 people 130–170 kgA/42 people 85 kg3 people 130 kg4 people 170 kgR/6P/10B Hand distance from the lower backObserve the task and examine the horizontal distance between each worker’s handsand their lower back. You should assess the ‘worst-case scenario’, including pickingup and putting down. Use the following illustrations and descriptions as a guide:Upper arms vertical ANDtorso uprightHands close to the lowbackUpper arms angled away fromtorso OR torso bent forwardG/0Hands at moderatedistance from the low backUpper arms angled away fromtorso AND torso bent forwardA/3Hands far from thelow backR/6C Vertical lift zonesObserve the vertical positions of the workers’ hands at both the start and end ofthe lift. The effect of stature differences between team members is particularlyimportant when lifting goes above elbow height. Record the ‘worst-case’ colourband/score. Use the following illustrations and descriptions as a guide:Hands between kneeand elbow heightG/0Hands below knee AND/OR above elbow heightManual handling assessment charts (the MAC tool)A/1Hands at floor level orbelow OR head heightand aboveR/3Page 13 of 20

Health and SafetyExecutiveTeam handling operations assessment guideD Torso twisting and sideways bendingObserve the workers’ torsos as they lift the load. If their torsos twist in relation totheir hips OR they lean to one side as the load is lifted, the colour band is amberand the score is 1. If their torsos twist AND bend to the side as they lift the load,the colour band is red and the score is 2.Little or no torsotwisting or sidewaysbendingG/0Torsos either twisted ORbent sidewaysA/1Torsos both twistedAND bent sidewaysR/2E Postural constraintsLook for factors that force the team members to modify their postures. If theirmovements are restricted because of the space available (eg lifting in a narrowaisle or in a crowded or disorganised storage area) or lifting round obstructions,the colour band is amber and the score is 1. If the postures are severely restricted(eg lifting or carrying in an area with a

The Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992 set out a clear hierarchy of measures for dealing with risk likely to cause harm from manual handling. These are: avoid hazardous manual handling operations so far as reasonably practicable; assess any manual handling operations that cannot be avoided;File Size: 1MB

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

3) Auxiliary charts - change charts 4) Constant pressure charts (C.P. Charts) 5) Cross section charts, 6) Vertical time section, 7) Vertical cross section 8) Te-phi-gram 9) Radar echo charts Other charts Coverage of these charts depends upon the area for which the forecast is to

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.