Mortality And Cancer Incidence In A Pooled Cohort Of US .

2y ago
42 Views
2 Downloads
767.85 KB
12 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Rafael Ruffin
Transcription

Downloaded from oem.bmj.com on October 15, 2013 - Published by group.bmj.comMortality and cancer incidence in a pooledcohort of US firefighters from SanFrancisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (1950 2009)Robert D Daniels, Travis L Kubale, James H Yiin, et al.Occup Environ Med published online October 14, 2013doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101662Updated information and services can be found ed-2013-101662.full.htmlThese include:"Supplementary Data"Data /14/oemed-2013-101662.DC1.htmlThis article cites 42 articles, 5 of which can be accessed free shed online October 14, 2013 in advance of the print journal.P PReceive free email alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up inthe box at the top right corner of the online article.Email alertingserviceArticles on similar topics can be found in the following collectionsTopicCollections Asbestos (56 articles)Other exposures (681 articles)Advance online articles have been peer reviewed, accepted for publication, edited andtypeset, but have not not yet appeared in the paper journal. Advance online articles arecitable and establish publication priority; they are indexed by PubMed from initialpublication. Citations to Advance online articles must include the digital object identifier(DOIs) and date of initial publication.To request permissions go missionsTo order reprints go to:http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintformTo subscribe to BMJ go to:http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/

Downloaded from oem.bmj.com on October 15, 2013 - Published by group.bmj.comNotesAdvance online articles have been peer reviewed, accepted for publication, edited andtypeset, but have not not yet appeared in the paper journal. Advance online articles arecitable and establish publication priority; they are indexed by PubMed from initialpublication. Citations to Advance online articles must include the digital object identifier(DOIs) and date of initial publication.To request permissions go missionsTo order reprints go to:http://journals.bmj.com/cgi/reprintformTo subscribe to BMJ go to:http://group.bmj.com/subscribe/

Downloaded from oem.bmj.com on October 15, 2013 - Published by group.bmj.comOEM Online First, published on October 14, 2013 as 10.1136/oemed-2013-101662WorkplaceORIGINAL ARTICLEMortality and cancer incidence in a pooled cohortof US firefighters from San Francisco, Chicagoand Philadelphia (1950–2009)Robert D Daniels,1 Travis L Kubale,1 James H Yiin,1 Matthew M Dahm,1Thomas R Hales,1 Dalsu Baris,2 Shelia H Zahm,2 James J Beaumont,3Kathleen M Waters,1 Lynne E Pinkerton1 Additional material ispublished online only. To viewplease visit the journal ).1Division of Surveillance,Hazard Evaluations, and FieldStudies, National Institute forOccupational Safety andHealth, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA2Division of CancerEpidemiology and Genetics,National Cancer Institute,Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA3UC Davis Department ofPublic Health Sciences, Davis,Sacramento, California, USACorrespondence toDr Robert D Daniels, Divisionof Surveillance, HazardEvaluations, and Field Studies,National Institute forOccupational Safety andHealth, 4676 ColumbiaParkway, Mailstop R-13,Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA;rtd2@cdc.govReceived 12 June 2013Revised 10 September 2013Accepted 23 September 2013ABSTRACTObjectives To examine mortality patterns and cancerincidence in a pooled cohort of 29 993 US careerfirefighters employed since 1950 and followed through2009.Methods Mortality and cancer incidence wereevaluated by life table methods with the US populationreferent. Standardised mortality (SMR) and incidence(SIR) ratios were determined for 92 causes of death and41 cancer incidence groupings. Analyses focused on 15outcomes of a priori interest. Sensitivity analyses wereconducted to examine the potential for significant bias.Results Person-years at risk totalled 858 938 and403 152 for mortality and incidence analyses,respectively. All-cause mortality was at expectation(SMR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01, n 12 028). Therewas excess cancer mortality (SMR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10to 1.18, n 3285) and incidence (SIR 1.09, 95% CI1.06 to 1.12, n 4461) comprised mainly of digestive(SMR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.34, n 928; SIR 1.17,95% CI 1.10 to 1.25, n 930) and respiratory(SMR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.17, n 1096; SIR 1.16,95% CI 1.08 to 1.24, n 813) cancers. Consistent withprevious reports, modest elevations were observed inseveral solid cancers; however, evidence of excesslymphatic or haematopoietic cancers was lacking. Thisstudy is the first to report excess malignantmesothelioma (SMR 2.00, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.49, n 12;SIR 2.29, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.19, n 35) among USfirefighters. Results appeared robust under differingassumptions and analytic techniques.Conclusions Our results provide evidence of a relationbetween firefighting and cancer. The new finding ofexcess malignant mesothelioma is noteworthy, given thatasbestos exposure is a known hazard of firefighting.INTRODUCTION http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2013-101803To cite: Daniels RD,Kubale TL, Yiin JH, et al.Occup Environ MedPublished Online First:[please include Day MonthYear] doi:10.1136/oemed 2013-101662There are approximately 1.1 million volunteer andcareer firefighters in the US.1 During firefightingactivities, these workers may be exposed to manyknown carcinogens (eg, polycyclic aromatic hydro carbons(PAHs),formaldehyde,benzene,1,3-butadiene, asbestos and arsenic) in volatilisedcombustion and pyrolysis products or debris.2These exposures have raised concerns of increasedcancer among firefighters and have prompted anumber of exposure assessment and epidemiologicinvestigations. Some studies have found excessDanielsRD, et al. OccupEnvironauthorMed htArticle(or theiremployer) 2013. ProducedWhat this paper adds From previous studies, there is limitedepidemiological evidence of increased risk ofcancer from firefighting. We examined cancer in 30 000 careerfirefighters by pooling information from urbanfire departments in three large US cities. Thelarge sample size and long follow-up periodimproved risk estimates compared withprevious studies. We report that firefighting may be associatedwith increased risk of solid cancers.Furthermore, we report a new finding of excessmalignant mesothelioma among firefighters,suggesting the presence of an occupationaldisease from asbestos hazards in theworkplace.cancers of the brain,3–8 digestive tract,4 5 7–10genitourinary tract5 7 11 12 and lymphohematopoie tic organs.6 8 13 In a recent meta-analysis of 32studies, significant excess risk was reported forbrain, stomach, colon, rectum, prostate, testes, mul tiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma(NHL).14 Similarly, the International Agency forResearch on Cancer (IARC) reviewed 42 studiesand reported significant summary risks for prostaticand testicular cancers and NHL.2 Given limited evi dence, however, IARC concluded that firefighterexposures were only possibly carcinogenic tohumans (Group 2B).Most studies have examined mortality, but notcancer incidence, among relatively few firefightersrecruited from one fire department. The currentstudy examines mortality and cancer incidence in apooled cohort of firefighters employed in threemajor US cities. Malignancies of the brain,stomach, oesophagus, intestines, rectum, kidney,bladder, prostate, testes, leukaemia, multiplemyeloma and NHL were of a priori interest in thecurrent study, based on possible sites identified inprevious reviews.2 14 Lung cancer and chronicobstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were also ofinterest because inhalation is a major pathway forfirefighter exposures, and there is evidence ofby BMJ Publishing Group Ltd under licence.1

Workplacechronic and acute inflammatory respiratory effects in firefigh ters, which may be linked to cancer.2 Breast cancer was includedas a result of interests shared in researcher discussions withfirefighters.known, and on the 15th of the month of diagnosis if only thediagnosis month and year were known. The death date was usedwhen death preceded the estimated date.Statistical methodsMETHODSData collection methodsThis research was approved by the Institutional Review Boardsof the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Personnelrecords and previous study data were used to assemble the studyroster, which comprised male and female career firefighters ofall races employed for at least 1 day in fire departments servingSan Francisco, Chicago, or Philadelphia, from 1 January 1950,through 31 December 2009. Fire departments were selectedbased on size, location, work experience, records availabilityand the willingness of labour and city management to partici pate. ‘Career firefighter’ status was determined from job titlescategorised by researchers and vetted by each fire department.Selected job titles included general classifications of firefighters,firefighter paramedics, and fire department arson investigators.Persons of known race were mostly Caucasian (81%) and thosemissing race (2.5%) were hired in earlier periods of lowerminority hiring (median year at hire 1955). Therefore, personsmissing race were assumed Caucasian and retained in main ana lyses to maximise study size. Analyses were also conductedexcluding persons of unknown race.Vital status was ascertained from the National DeathIndex-Plus (NDI-Plus), the Social Security Administration DeathMaster File (SSA-DMF), personnel and pension board records,and records from the previous studies.9 10 Firefighters notfound to be deceased were confirmed alive by matches toemployment records, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) records,and data accessible through LexisNexis (a private vendor of resi dential information).Causes of death were obtained from previous studies,9 10NDI-Plus, and death certificates collected from state vitalrecords and retirement boards. Deaths of Philadelphia firefigh ters through 1986 were previously determined by Baris et al,9who retrieved and coded death certificates to the ninth revisionof the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9).San Francisco firefighter deaths were determined through 1982by Beaumont et al.10 In that and the current study, causes ofdeath were coded to the ICD revision in effect at the time ofdeath. The underlying cause of death determined by a trainednosologist was used for all mortality analyses.Incident cases were defined as all primary invasive cancers,and in situ bladder cancers among firefighters matched to statecancer registries on name, gender, race, date of birth and SocialSecurity number. The last known residence and the state ofdeath were used to narrow inclusion of registries for case ascer tainment to 11 states (ie, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois,Indiana, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, Oregon, Pennsylvaniaand Washington) where nearly 95% of all deaths in knownstates occurred (see online supplementary table S1). The siteand histology of each tumour were used to classify cancers inone of 41 diagnostic groups using the InternationalClassification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition(ICD-O-3).15 The conversion from ICD-O-3 to ICD-10 usedthe Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program(SEER) recodes (dated 27 January 2003) following slight modi fication to align with mortality groupings and to account forrecent classification changes. Diagnosis dates were assigned as of1 July of the year of diagnosis if only the diagnosis year was2The NIOSH Life Table Analysis System (LTAS.NET) was used toexamine mortality and cancer incidence.16 Main analyses usedthe US population as referent. In all analyses, person-years atrisk (PYAR) were stratified by gender, race (Caucasian, otherraces), age (age 15–85 years in 5-year categories), and calendaryear (in 5-year categories). Confidence limits for risk measureswere estimated based on a Poisson distribution for the observedoutcome, with exact limits for outcomes with 10 or feweroccurrences.For mortality analyses, PYAR began on the latest of 1 January1950 or the date of cohort inclusion, and ended the earliest ofthe date of death (DOD), the date last observed (DLO), or 31December 2009. US mortality rates (1950–2009) were used toestimate the expected numbers of deaths for all causes, allcancers and 92 categories of underlying cause of death.17Additional mortality rates were developed to separately reporton cancers of the small intestine, large intestine and testes tocoincide with incidence rates; however, these rates were limitedto time periods after 1959. In both cases, the subsites of interest(ie, colon and testes) account for the largest proportion of thedeaths in the respective aggregate site (ie, intestine or malegenital organs excluding prostate); therefore, the aggregate sitereasonably approximates the subsite. The standardised mortalityratio (SMR) was calculated as the ratio of the observed to thetotal number of expected deaths.Two approaches were used to examine cancer incidence. Themain analyses included first and later primary cancers(ie, multiple-cancer approach) occurring within the risk period.PYAR accrued from the date of statewide ascertainment by therespective fire department’s state cancer registry (eg, 1 January1988 for San Francisco firefighters (see online supplementarytable S1)) or cohort inclusion, whichever was latest, and endedat the earliest of the DOD, DLO, or 31 December 2009.Secondary analyses were restricted to the first occurrence ofinvasive cancer (ie, first-cancer approach). In these analyses,PYAR for cases ended on the date of first diagnosis. In bothapproaches, the standardised incidence ratio (SIR) was calcu lated as the ratio of observed malignancies to the expectednumber of cases estimated using US incidence rates (1985–2009) calculated from SEER data.18 Additional steps requiredfor first-cancer analyses were: selecting the most commoncancer when diagnoses included multiple primary tumours onthe same day (n 21), excluding firefighters known to have acancer diagnosis prior to the start of the risk date (n 55), andadjusting US rates for cancer prevalence using methodsdescribed by Merrill et al.19Heterogeneity in fire department-specific SMRs and SIRs wasexamined using Poisson regression modelling. To control forgender, age, calendar year and race, an offset term was set tothe expected number of deaths or cases in each stratum of theclassification table. To address differences between fire depart ments, a mixed model was used that specified a random inter cept term. Thus, the model intercept is the log of the pooledSMR, adjusted for heterogeneity among the fire departments.The significance of heterogeneity was assessed by likelihoodratio test (significance level of 0.05).Several sensitivity analyses were conducted. First, we exam ined the effects of including prevalent hires (workers employedbefore 1950) and short–term workers (those employed 1 year)Daniels RD, et al. Occup Environ Med 2013;0:1–10. doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101662

Workplacein mortality analyses. Prevalent hires must be employed longenough to be recruited into the study; thus, these workers mayhave a survival advantage compared with persons hired duringthe follow-up period (ie, incident hires).20 Short-term workersinclude temporary hires and probationary firefighters whosehealth and lifestyle patterns may differ from those employedone or more years. Short-term workers may also have had sub stantial occupational histories other than as firefighters, possiblyin jobs with hazardous exposures. Second, we examined ageeffects on risk estimates in two age-at-risk categories (17–64,65 years). Testing of an effect across all 5-year age groups wasaccomplished using mixed models adjusted for age-at-riskgroups. Third, we conducted SMR analyses restricting observa tion to age 84 years or less. Including PYAR for ages 85 yearscould bias results from: rates used in analyses that are openended, more uncertainty in underlying cause of death at laterages, and subjects who are incorrectly traced as alive having adisproportionate effect in the open-ended age group.21 Fourth,we calculated SMRs using California, Illinois and PennsylvaniaState populations as referent for firefighters from San Francisco,Chicago and Philadelphia, respectively. Last, SMRs and standar dised rate ratios (SRRs) were calculated for categories ofemployment duration ( 10, 10– 20, 20– 30, 30 years).Trend slopes with Wald-based two-sided p values (significancelevel of 0.05) were calculated for the change in SRRs withincreasing duration.RESULTSThere were 29 993 firefighters available for study, contributing858 938 PYAR (table 1). The cohort was largely male (97%),with mean age at first employment and total years employed of29 and 21 years, respectively. Fewer than 5% of firefightersTable 1were short-term workers and approximately 30% were firstemployed prior to 1950. A higher percentage of women (9.4%)were short-term workers compared with men (4.3%) (see onlinesupplementary table S2). Prevalent hires, on average, tended tobe employed longer ( 7.9 years, t test p 0.001) and had agreater attained age ( 17.0 years, t test p 0.001) than incidenthires. Persons eligible for incidence analyses using the multiplecancer approach (n 24 453) contributed 403 152 PYAR. Thefirst-cancer approach included 24 398 persons contributing383 577 PYAR. There were 4461 malignant tumours distributedamong 3903 firefighters with cancer. Among these, 488reported cancers at multiple primary sites. Mortality and cancerincidence results are summarised in table 2 and in online supple mentary tables S3–S5. To aid in comparisons with previousstudies, table 2 also shows summary risk estimates (SREs)reported by LeMasters et al14, whose meta-analysis includedstudies published through 2003.MortalityWith the US population referent, all-cause mortality was atexpectation (SMR 0.99, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.01, n 12 028).Ischaemic heart disease was the leading cause of death(SMR 1.01, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.04, n 3619). There was signifi cantly decreased mortality in other outcomes that may berelated to healthy worker selection and survivor effects (HWE),such as non-malignant respiratory diseases (SMR 0.80, 95% CI0.74 to 0.86, n 796), cerebrovascular disease (SMR 0.91,95% CI 0.84 to 0.98, n 636), diabetes mellitus (SMR 0.72,95% CI 0.62 to 0.83, n 175), nervous system disorders(SMR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.93, n 187), and alcoholism(SMR 0.61, 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.86, n 31). In particular, therewas a strong decrease in COPD mortality (SMR 0.72, 95% CIDemographic characteristics of the cohort by fire department and combined (1950–2009)DescriptionStudy cohort:Eligible for mortality analysisPYARYears of follow-up; avg. (SD)Race (%):WhiteOtherUnknownGender (%):MaleFemaleVital status:Alive (%)Deceased (%)Unknown cause of deathAttained age*; avg. (SD)LTFUPYAR potentially LTFU (%)Employment:Avg. hire yearAge at hire; avg. (SD)Employment years; avg. (SD)Hired before 1950 (%)Employed 1 year (%)All fire departmentsSan FranciscoChicagoPhiladelphia29 993858 93829 (16)5313154 31729 (16)15 185419 41428 (16)9495285 20730 (16)24 244 (80.8)5008 (16.7)741 (2.5)4254 (80.1)986 (18.6)73 (1.4)11 736 (77.3)2808 (18.5)641 (4.2)8254 (86.9)1214 (12.8)27 ( 1.0)29 002 (96.7)991 (3.3)5009 (94.3)304 (5.7)14 694 (96.8)491 (3.2)9299 (97.9)196 (2.1)17 965 (59.9)12 028 (40.1)14460 (16)1758809 (1.0)3239 (61.0)2074 (39.0)962 (16)159 ( 1.0)924159449159321483196729 (5)22 (11)1682 (32)194 (3.7)197029213294891196829 (5)21 (11)8085 (27)1328 (4.4)(60.9)(39.1)( 213109243(5)(11)(33)(2.6)(16)(57.8)(42.2)(16)*Age attained at earliest of the date of death, date LTFU or 31 December 2009.Avg., average; LTFU, lost to follow-up; PYAR, person-years at risk.

recent classification changes. Diagnosis dates were assigned as of 1 July of the year of diagnosis if only the diagnosis year was. known, and on the 15th of the month of diagnosis if only the diagnosis month and year were known. The de

Related Documents:

Figure 1: Incidence and Mortality Rates, Female Breast Cancer, Louisiana vs. US. 2008-201222 Figure 2: Age-Specific Incidence Rates Female Breast Cancer, Louisiana, 2008-2012 .23 Figure 3: Trends of Cancer Incidence Female Breast Cancer, Whites and Blacks, LA vs. U.S.,

1. Population and Cancer Incidence 1 2. Leading Sites of Cancer 8 3. Cancer Sites Associated wi th the use of Tobacco 31 4. Basis of Diagnosis 35 5. Cancer Mortality 41 6. Comparison of Cancer Incidence and Patterns across all Population Based Cancer Registries 54 7. Data Quality and Indices of Reliability 69 8. Definitions, Statistical Terms .

cervical cancer as the seventh most common cancer among females [3]. Although the incidence rate of cervical cancer shows a gradually decreasing trend, the incidence increased from 1993 through 2002 in women in their 20s and in those who were 70 years or older. As the incidence of cervical cancer decreased, an increase in the incidence of

Cancer incidence—Cancer deaths 2. Pathogenetic factors: a balance of risks 3. Clinical effects of cancer 4. Death in cancer 5. Grading and Staging 6. Diagnosis? Cancer Age Environment Heredity-cancer mortality peak 55-75-under age 15, cancer causes approx. 10% of all deaths-cancer w/ ag

WORKING OF PREMIUM WORKING OF LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUM FOR AGE GROUP 05-35 PER SUM ASSURED Rs. 1,00,000/-Heart Attack incidence 150 Cancer incidence 40 Blindness incidence 10 Liver & Kidney Transplantation incidence 50 HIV incidence 20 TOTAL 270 Total Claims Incidence Rate 0.0027 Marketing Expenses 20% Profit Margin 10% Administration 20%

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Fred Ueland, MD University of Kentucky Gynecologic Oncology. . Ovarian Cancer Incidence and Mortality Data from the American Cancer Society 200 deaths in Kentucky in 2006. Incidence . Mortality. Classifica

Purpose: Breast cancer is a common disease with a relatively good prognosis. Therefore, understanding the spectrum of diseases and mortality among breast cancer patients is important, though currently incomplete. We systematically examined the incidence and mortality of all diseases following a breast cancer diagnosis, as well as

Ovarian cancer is the seventh most common cancer among women. There are three types of ovarian cancer: epithelial ovarian cancer, germ cell cancer, and stromal cell cancer. Equally rare, stromal cell cancer starts in the cells that produce female hormones and hold the ovarian tissues together. Familial breast-ovarian cancer