1. Surveillance Audit Report Unannounced Audit FSSC 22000
Audit Report FSSC 220001. Surveillance Audit ReportUnannounced auditFSSC 22000onfidentialVersion 4.1January 2018CADM Co.- SouthportDQS CFS GmbHAugust-Schanz-Straße 2160433 Frankfurt am Mainwww.dqs-cfs.comJuly 2019
Audit Report FSSC 22000Audit recommendationIn reference to FSSC 22000 the audit team recommends to DQS CFS GmbH: Issuance of the certificate Issuance of the certificate as soon as implementation of corrective actions has beendemonstrated. Corrective actions have been accepted. Maintenance of the certificate Maintenance of the certificate as soon asimplementation of corrective actions has been demonstrated. Corrective actions havebeen accepted.Corrective actionsCorrective actions of the current audit have been demonstrated and have been accepted by theauditor: Yes Noential NA (no corrective actions necessary)The implementation of corrective actions of the previous audit has been demonstrated and hasbeen verified by the auditor Yes No NA (no corrective actions on previous audit)on NofidUse of FSSC 222000 Logo (Mark)The use of the FSSC 22000 logo complies with the terms and rules for the use of the logo of FSSC inthe version that is currently valid: Yes Not applicable (No Useage)SurnameRoleISO TS 22003 scope (s)PatrickFrostLead AuditorAllCAudit team membersGiven nameThe technical assessment is based on the audit findings and conclusions and any other relevant information.Technical AssessorGiven nameSurnameDateNavidFalaki10/8/20190100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./2018Signature2/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Audit program and planmark accordingType of AuditAuditprogramThe actual audit is:see Annex I –Inspection plan foraudit program Initial Certification (Stage 2) Surveillance announced audit Surveillance unannounced audit Re-certification audit Upgrade audit(from existing ISO 22000 certification to FSSC 22000) Transfer audit (from another CB)Certificateexpiry dateDeviationfrom auditprogramInsert certificateexpiry date2021-12-05Describe issuesimpacting the auditprogram and theirreasons No deviations from audit programAudit planSee Annex I –Schedule Annex I – Schedule will be uploaded with the auditDescribe issuesimpacting the auditplan and theirreasons No deviations from audit plan Deviations necessary, but minimum total audit timeentialDeviationfrom auditplan The following deviations from the audit program were noticed:documentsallocated on sitefid 50% of audit time allocated in production and storage area The following deviations from the audit plan were applied:ConTotal audit time was reduced to 3 mandays from 3.5. Using mandaycalculator: (1.5 basic 1.0 added HACCP 1 FSSC 1 FTE) X 2/3 3.0 mandays. Time was sufficient due to enclosed process,auditor familiarity, and similarity of processes.0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./20183/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Lead AuditorCo- AuditorTechnicalExpertAuditobjectiveInsert CustomerRelation Code ( AZ)10011358Insert CertificationBodyDQS CFS GmbHInsert mutuallyagreed languageused during theauditEnglishgiven and surnameof the Lead auditorgiven and surnameof the CO auditor(s)given and surnameof the technicalexpert(s)Confirm any specialattention areasAudit TeamPatrick Frost All areas are in conformance with the requirementsentialAudit detailsCustomerrelation codeCB nameandofficelocationAuditlanguageaccording to FSSC 22000 Version 4.1 Only partly:Audit criteriaStart date:2019-07-30Start time:08:00Finished date:2019-07-31Finished time:16:302.0 mandaysConAuditdurationAudit timereductionISO 22000:2005, ISO 22002-1:2009, FSSC 22000 V.4 add’l reqfidAudit datesand timesAssessed policies,procedures andrequirements:Start date,(DD,MM,YYYY),incl. time (HH:MM)Finished date,(DD,MM,YYYY),incl. time (HH:MM)Details of Auditduration (mandays)(please refer toapprovedjustification):Details of Audit timereduction (pleaserefer to approvedjustification)Additionalaudit time foroff-siteactivitiesDetails of additionalaudit time for offsite activities: No reduction Audit time reduction: Total audit time was reduced to 3 mandaysfrom 3.5. Using manday calculator: (1.5 basic 1.0 added HACCP 1 FSSC 1 FTE) X 2/3 3.0 mandays. Time was sufficient dueto enclosed process, auditor familiarity, and similarity of processes. No off-site activities add. time for off-site activities:On-site audit time calculationInsert audit timecalculation forcomplete cycle100% initial66% Re-certification33% SurveillanceOtherstandardsD100%66%33%MSFTE1Mention the otherstandards that areaudited togetherwith FSSC 22000.0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1HStandardVersion 25/Jan./2018Audit typeFSSCadditionTotal12MD4/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Number ofHACCPstudiesNumber ofemployees(FTEs)Number ofshiftsEmployeesper shift(FTE)Also show audit typeand man-daysallocated to thesestandards.Insert number ofHACCP studies3Insert numberemployees67Insert number ofshifts4Insert number ofemployees per shift15Off-site activitiesfidential(Third party off-site services hired by auditee, such as storage, transportation, production of semi- finished products, etc.)Insert legal name ofN/ARegisteredthird-party off-sitelegal nameservice(s) (if applicable)Insert trading nameTradingof third-party off-sitename(s)service(s) (if applicable)Insert scope of thirdScopeparty off-siteservice(s) (if applicable)Add location ofLocationservice(s) (if applicable)Audit details previous auditmark according Type ofprevious AuditAudit typeThe previous audit was:on Initial Certification (Stage 1) Initial Certification (Stage 2)C Surveillance announced audit Surveillance unannounced audit Re-certification audit Upgrade audit(from existing ISO 22000 certification to FSSC 22000) Transfer audit (from another CB)Audit dateDate of previousAudit on Bodyfrom previous Audit0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1From:31/10/2018To:02/11/2018 DQS CFS GmbH other CB:Version 25/Jan./20185/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Organization profileDescription of the certified organisation:Registered legalRegistrationADM Co.name:Chamber ofCommerceGovernmentalregistration numberStreet & Street no.Contactperson1730 East Moore St. SEPostcode28461CitySouthportCountryUSANameScott PhillipsfunctionQA 457-7565Give information to :-Ownership of thecompany-History-age of company-age of site-If applicable links toother sites-Turnover (ifavailable)-Product(s)-customer types-production volume-type of specialistequipment orprocesses on site-head office audited-exclusion of scope-Witness auditThe Archer Daniels Midland, Southport Plant is part of theArcher Daniels Midland Company, a publically heldcorporation with headquarters in Decatur, Illinois. Thecompany began in 1902, when George A. Archer and John W.Daniels began a linseed crushing business. In 1923, ArcherDaniels Linseed Company acquired Midland Linseed ProductsCompany, and the Archer-Daniels-Midland Company wasformed. The Southport Plant was originally built by Pfizer,Incorporated in 1975 to manufacture Citric Acid, SodiumCitrate, and Potassium Citrate. Archer Daniels Midlandpurchased the plant and business in 1990 from Pfizer and hascontinued to produce the same products at the location sincethat time. Citric Acid, Sodium Citrate, and Potassium Citrateare used by Food, Feed, and Pharmaceutical Companies. TheSouthport Plant property is approximately 2428114 m2 and theplant site occupies 404686 m2. (The site’s estimated annualturnover is confidential). The products are marketedworldwide.ConfidGeneraldescription hportThe Southport plant has 147 employees running two shifts7am to 7pm and 7pm to 7am for 365 days per year. Of thisnumber, approximately 67 are dedicated to the food gradeprocess. 37 cover the primary shift.The site had a major reorganization in June 2019 resulting inreduced salaried headcount and reassignment ofresponsibilities. There is a new Plant Manager and QASuperintendent as well as other supervisory position changes.Fermentation and feed portions of the site are excluded fromthe audit.This audit was not witnessed.0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./20186/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000All activities coveredby the scope shallbe auditedSeasonalactivitiesN/AHead Office profileDescription of the Head Office (were appropriate):Registered legalRegistrationADM Co.name:Chamber tryUSANameDave Watsonfunctionemail4666 Faries ParkwayDivisional Quality iple site ispossible for foodchain categories:A, E, FI and G-Exception forCategories C, D, I,K:- Head officecontrolling certainfunction pertinent tocertification (20%audit time reductionmay be applicable)- Organizations withoff-site activities (amaximum of fiveN/ACNumber ofsitesentialContactpersonGovernmentalregistration numberStreet & Street no.fidLocationDecaturAudit ScopeFoodcategoryIndicate applicablePrerequisiteProgram(s)According PRP’s:- Farming (AI,AII):ISO / TS 22002-3:2011- Food Manufacturing(CI, CII, CIII, CIV):ISO / TS 22002-1:20090100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1 AI Farming of Animals for Meat/ Milk/ Egg/ Honey AII Farming of Fish and Seafood CI Processing of perishable Animal Products(i.e. Fish and Seafood, Meat, Eggs, Dairy and Fish products) CII Processing of perishable Plant Products(i.e. Fruits and fresh Juices, Vegetables, Grains, Nuts and Pulses) CIII Processing of perishable Animals and Plant Products (mixed products)Version 25/Jan./20187/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000- Animal FeedProduction (DI, DII* ):ISO / TS 22002-6:2016(i.e. Pizza, Lasagne, Sandwich, Dumpling, Ready- to- eat meals) CIV Processing of ambient stable products(i.e. Caned food, Biscuits, Snacks, Oil, Drinking water, Beverages,Pasta, Flour, Sugar, Food grade salt)- Catering (E):ISO / TS 22002-2:2013- Retail (FI):BSI / PAS 221:2013- Transport andStorage (GI, GII):NEN/ NTA 8059:2016- Packaging (I):ISO / TS 22002-4:2013- (Bio)Chemicals (K)ISO / TS 22002-1:2009- Pet food only for Catsand Dogs (DII):ISO / TS 22002-1:2009 DI Production of animal Feed DII Production of Pet food for Dogs and Cats DII* Production of Pet food for other Pets than Dogs and Cats E Catering FI Retail GI Provision of Transport and Storage Services for perishable Food and Feed GII Provision of Transport and Storage Services for ambient Food and Feedential I Production of Food and Feed Packaging and Packaging Material K Production of (Bio)Chemicals(when appropriate)CVerificationof the ScopestatementThe manufacture of citric acid, sodium citrate, potassiumcitrate and liquid citric acid (exemption – fermentation processand feed product)fidExclusionsSpecify the productsor productcategories,processes andproduction sites thatare covered by thefood safetymanagementsystem andmentioned on thecertificate.Description ofexclusion(s) from thescopeConform that theScope statement isin compliance withthe FSSC 22000Requirement (will beverified out by DQStechnical reviewer)fermentation process and feed product The Scope statement is in compliance with the FSSC 22000onScopestatementRequirements. Its has been verified by the DQS CFS technicalreviewer. The Scope statement is not in compliance with theFSSC 22000 Requirements due to:General findingsSummarize thestatus, anygovernmentalinspection findings,etc. Summary of govermental inspection tChanges sincethe last alcompliance0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1 No govermental inspection findings, since the last FSSC 22000AuditVersion 25/Jan./20188/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000ComplaintsmanagementInsert ComplaintsKPIs in PPM3 complaints YTD; 111MM lbs produced;Recalls andwithdrawalsSummary of recalls /withdrawals No recall(s) No withdrawal(s)DateProductProduct Volume recall(s)Confidential withdrawal(s)0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./20189/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Summary of audit findings Stage 1Date ofStage 1AuditNonconformitiesAreas ofconcern(Stage 1 only)Insert date ofStage 1 audit Not applicable Date:Standard &ClauseCAPclosed by:Audit findings(DD/MM/YYYY)Number and shortdescription of theStage 1 findings thatmay lead to anonconformityduring the stage 2auditSummary of audit findingsStandard &ClauseShort description ofcritical nonconformitiesShort description ofMajor nonconformitiesMinor nonconformitiesShort description ofMinor nonconformitiesCAPclosed by:(DD/MM/YYYY) Yes NoTS22002-15.7A partial uncovered pallet of FIBCwas observed in the FIBC packingroom.TS22002-18.2A gasket covering the anacitheater port was deterioratedallowing for possiblecontamination.TS22002-18.6Several pieces of duct tape wereused in the C513 crystallizer areato suppress vacuum leaks. Tapewas not dated and initialed persite’s policy. No workorders couldbe provided indicating they werescheduled for repair.TS22002-111.3Several instances of parts andtools were observed on floors,grates, and cross-beams. Areasunder the sifters had largeaccumulation of product.ISO220008.4.1bNot all internal audits to thestandard were conducted asscheduled as none of the secondquarter audits were completed.onC0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1closedCAP Yes NofidMajor nonconformitiesAudit findingsentialNonconformitiesCritical nonconformitiesVersion 25/Jan./2018 Yes No10/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000ConfidentialThere is also a backlog ofcorrective actions for findings.0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./201811/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Executive summaryA statement on the conformity and the effectiveness of the management system together with a summary of the evidencerelating to:-the capability of the management system to meet applicable requirements and expected outcomes;- the internal audit and management review processImplementation, consistency and effectiveness of the food safety management system, especiallyof the prerequisite programs and the HACCP-plans, are checked, verified and evaluated in thisaudit by means of the following methods and processes: Inspection and auditing of the site, including receiving, recovery, and load out for bothtruck and tanker cars by both the food safety team and the operators. Auditing of support processes such as the laboratory, pest control, inspection ofmeasuring and test equipment, water supply, compressed air supply, steam supply andmaintenance. Auditing of processes for release and hold of product. Reviewing customer complains as they pertain to quality or food safety.entialProcesses are found to be in compliance with internal procedures and with the requirements ofthe standard.ConfidDuring the interviews it was found, that all employees are well aware and trained regardingproduct quality and food safety.0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./201812/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000Food Safety Management System (ISO 22000:2005) findingsSummary: Summary of findings related to ISO 22000:2005 sections 4 to 8 while highlighting all of thesections shortly and in particular the ones where NC were noted including reference to the checklists withmore details.4.Food safetymanagementsystem4.1 General requirementsThe food safety management system has been implemented and in use over the past7 years. This information is held within the quality manual on the electronic PolicyTech system and updated on an as needed basis. The most recent update occurred inOctober 2018.4.2 Documentation RequirementsThe document control procedure for the Food Safety Management System (FSMS) islocated in the Policy Tech quality manual .entialThe SOPs and policies pertaining to the FSMS are scheduled to be reviewed on atleast an annual basis. The FSMS standard is located on the Policy Tech in thecompany intranet and is accessible to the employees working in the the facility.Employees interviewed were able to quickly find the SOP desired.Details of non conformities if identified during the audit:Managementcommitment5.1 Management commitmentTop management is commited to implementation of the FSMS. This is evidenced bythe establishment of a food safety policy and continuous improvement efforts. Therehave been no non-conformities during the previous two audits and additionalopportunities from the previous audit were addressed.on5.fidDetails toNon- Conf.CMonthly management reviews are conducted specific to discussing food safety issues.Key performance indicators had been developed and are monitored to ensure targetsare met. These include but are not limited to monitoring customer complaints, quarterlysanitation scores, internal rejection rates, and supplier audits. All are performing at orabove target.5.2 Food safety policyThe food safety policy stated: ADM Southport Citric Acid Division is committed toproducing safe and superior quality products that meets all applicable legal, statutoryand regulatory requirements of food safety.The Food Safety policy was signed and dated by the Plant Manager, QASuperintendent posted in several locations and available to all personnel on theintranet via Policy Tech. Food safety had clearly been integrated into the company’spolicy. There was evidence of commitment to food safety and quality on all levels ofthe organization.5.3 Food safety management system planningRegular reviews are conducted and minutes are kept. Daily, monthly and quarterlymanagement meetings are conducted.5.4 Responsibility and authority0100 ENG FORM 30 Report FSSC V4.1Version 25/Jan./201813/28
Audit Report FSSC 22000An organzation chart is developed with both a chain of command and for the foodsafety quality team. The food safety responsibilities are clearly designated for staffmembers as is back-up roles. This was reviewed for the Plant Manager, TechnicalSuperintendant, Plant Superintendent, QA Superintendent, Purchasing Manager,Engineering Manager. All departments – Operations, QA, Maintenance, Engineering,IT, EHS/HR reported directly to the Plant Manager.5.5 Food safety team leaderThe food safety team leader was identified as Scott Phillips, QA Superintendent. Hisresponsibilities included:a.Manage the Food Safety Team (FST) and organize its work.b.Ensure relevant training and education of the FST members.c.Ensure the FSMS is established, implemented, maintained, and updated.d.Provide a communication channel from the FST to the Plant Manager andCorporate Management.The food safety team leader has had the appropriate training in HACCP, ISO andFSSC either conducted by Corporate QA or by UL-DQS training group.Confidential5.6 CommunicationBoth external and internal communication efforts has been addressed and are includedin the quality manual.External – Communication with customers regarding specifications, shelf life studies,letter of guarantees, complaints, corrective actions, sales and satisfaction arechanneled thru Corp Sales and Technical teams. However, the plant does have directcommunciation with customers on complaints and issues. Communication withsuppliers and contractors are channeled thru ADM Global Sourcing Unit for items thatare globally bought. Majority of materials required by the facility are source by theplant. Contractor and facility specific supplier approval and management process isunder the facility control. All other supplier management process is under CorporatePurchasing control. Risk assessment is conducted for each supplier are based on therisk, the suppliers are managed by audits, require certification, incoming materialinspection or reliance on COA. A letter of gurantee is required from relevant suppliers,contractors. A copy of all letters were kept on file including the Pest Control Operator,Uniform services.Internal – Numerous types of meetings and comunication are held on regular basis.Examples of meetings held were Daily Operation meetings, Monthly and Quarterlymanagement meetings. Monthly Safety
ISO / TS 22002-3:2011 - Food Manufacturing (CI, CII, CIII, CIV): ISO / TS 22002-1:2009 AI Farming of Animals for Meat/ Milk/ Egg/ Honey AII Farming of Fish and Seafood CI Processing of perishable Animal Products (i.e. Fish and Seafood, Meat, Eggs, Dairy and Fish products) CII Processing of perishable Plant Products
The quality audit system is mainly classified in three different categories: i Internal Audit ii. External Audits iii. Regulatory Audit . Types Of Quality Audit. In food industries all three audit system may be used to carry out 1. Product manufacturing audit 2. Plant sanitation/GMP audit 3. Product Quality audit 4. HACCP audit
INTERNAL AUDIT Example –Internal audit report [Short Client Name] Internal Audit Report Rev. [Rev Number] STEP ONE: Audit Plan Process to Audit (Audit Scope): Audit Date(s): Lead Auditor: Audit #: Auditor(s): Site(s) to Audit: Applicable Clauses of [ISO 9001 or AS9100] S
Report Title: An Internal Audit Report on the Audit of Enforcement Collections Report No.: 2018-103 Report Date: August 2018 ; Audit of Property Tax Appraisals : Completed Report Title: An Internal Audit Report on the Audit of Property Tax Appraisals Report No.: 2018-104 Report Date: August 2018 ; Audit of Treasury Remote Depositing : Completed
SQF Unannounced Audit Protocol In Edition 7.2 of the SQF Code includes requirements for the conduct of one (1) unannounced audit over the next 3 certification cycles. Further information on this requirement can be reviewed in the Code itself (Part A, Clause 4.5). MNCertification will discuss
AUDIT OF DEKALB COUNTY DATA CENTER PHYSICAL SECURITY AUDIT REPORT NO. 2018-007-IT John Greene Chief Audit Executive FINAL REPORT What We Did In accordance with the Office of Independent Internal Audit's (OIIA) Annual Audit Plan, we conducted a performance audit of the DeKalb County Data Center Physical Security.
4.1 Quality management system audit 9.2.2.2 Quality management system audit - except: organization shall audit to verify compliance with MAQMSR, 2nd Ed. 4.2 Manufacturing process audit 9.2.2.3 Manufacturing process audit 4.3 Product audit 9.2.2.4 Product audit 4.4 Internal audit plans 9.2.2.1 Internal audit programme
1.2. Indicator-Based Surveillance (IBS) and Event-Based Surveillance (EBS) Approaches Used to Detect Diseases, Conditions and Events 52 1.3. Standard Case Definitions 52 1.4 Establish Event-Based Surveillance (EBS) at all levels 57 1.5 Update LGA Procedures for Surveillance and Response 58 1.6 Role of the laboratory in surveillance and response 61
Electronic Integrated Disease Surveillance System supports different types of surveillance: passive surveillance (case-based and aggregate) is available for human and veterinary diseases, active surveillance is supported for veterinary disease, vector surveillance is planned to be released in the next version.
