“Toward The Faces Of The Menorah Shall The Seven Lamps .

2y ago
38 Views
2 Downloads
773.42 KB
6 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Dahlia Ryals
Transcription

Rabbi Pinches FriedmanParshas Behaaloscha 5775Translation by Dr. Baruch Fox“Toward the faces of the Menorah shall the seven lamps cast light”The Purpose of Kindling the Menorah—which Alludes to the Light of the Torah-Is to Draw upon the Seven Concealed Parts of the TorahIn this week’s parsha, parshas Behaaloscha, it states (Bamidbar8, 1): בהעלותך את הנרות אל מול , דבר אל אהרן ואמרת אליו , “וידבר ה’ אל משה לאמר ויעש כן אהרן אל מול פני המנורה העלה נרותיה כאשר , פני המנורה יאירו שבעת הנרות ” —צוה ה’ את משה Hashem spoke to Moshe saying, “Speak to Aharonand say to him: When you kindle the lamps, toward the face ofthe menorah shall the seven lamps cast light. Aharon did so;toward the face of the menorah he kindled its lamps, as Hashemhad commanded Moshe. Rashi comments: ששה , “יאירו שבעת הנרות וכן שלשה , הפתילות שבהן , שלשה המזרחיים פונים למול האמצעי , שעל ששת הקנים ” —המערביים ראשי הפתילות למול האמצעי concerning the six lamps thatare on the six branches, the three eastern ones, their wicksshould face the middle lamp, and similarly, the three westernones, the tops of their wicks should face the middle lamp.Let us endeavor to understand and to explain why HKB”Hcommanded us to kindle a menorah with seven lamps specifically—no more and no less. Furthermore, why did He command that theybe kindled in such a manner that the six lamps should face themiddle lamp? This implies that the middle candle possesses somesort of innate, special importance, requiring that the other lampsshould bend toward it. Let us endeavor to explain the uniquesignificance and superiority of the middle lamp.Your Role Is Greater than TheirsWe shall begin to shed some light on the matter by referring toRashi’s comment: לפי שכשראה , “למה נסמכה פרשת המנורה לפרשת הנשיאים אמר , לא הוא ולא שבטו , חלשה אז דעתו שלא היה עמהם בחנוכה , אהרן חנוכת הנשיאים .” שאתה מדליק ומיטיב את הנרות , חייך שלך גדולה משלהם , לו הקב”ה Rashi asks:Why does the Torah juxtapose the passage of the menorahwith the passage describing the contributions of the “nesiim”(the princes of the shevatim)? Because when Aharon sawthe inauguration of the “nesiim,” he was disheartened, for hedid not participate with them in the inauguration–neither henor his tribe. HKBH said to him: “I swear by your life! Yourcontribution is greater than theirs, for you will kindle andprepare the Menorah’s lamps.”Rashi’s comment is founded on the following Midrash(Bamidbar Rabbah 15, 6): וכל הנשיאים , ושבט אפרים הקריב , “את מוצא למעלה י”א שבטים הקריבו אוי לי שמא , והיה אומר . זה אהרן , ומי היה נשיאו של לוי , חוץ מנשיאו של לוי , הקריבו לך אמור לו לאהרן אל , אמר לו הקב”ה למשה . בשבילי אין הקב”ה מקבל שבטו של לוי לכך נאמר דבר אל אהרן ואמרת אליו בהעלותך את , תתיירא לגדולה מזו אתה מתוקן אבל הנרות לעולם אל מול פני , הקרבנות כל זמן שבית המקדש קיים הם נוהגים , הנרות .” וכל הברכות שנתתי לך לברך את בני אינן בטלין לעולם , המנורה יאירו You find in the passage above that eleven tribes offeredsacrifices, and the tribe of Ephraim sacrificed, and all of the“nesiim” sacrificed, with the exception of the “nasi” of Levi.Who was the “nasi” of Levi? It was Aharon . . . He thought tohimself: Woe is me! Perhaps, it is because of me that HKB”His not accepting the tribe of Levi. HKB”H said to Moshe: “Gotell Aharon not to despair; you are destined for somethinggreater.” This is the significance of the statement: “Speak toAharon and say to him: When you kindle the lamps . . .” Whilethe Beis HaMikdash exists, the korbanoswill be offered; thelamps, however, will face the center of the menorah forever.Furthermore, all of the berachot that I gave you to bless Mychildren will never be annulled.The Ramban is perplexed by the statement in the Midrash:“While the Beis HaMikdash exists, the korbanoswill beoffered; the lamps, however, will face the center of themenorah forever.” He writes: “והנה ידוע שכשאין בית המקדש קיים ” —והקרבנות בטלין מפני חורבנו אף הנרות בטלות it is known that when theBeis HaMikdash no longer exists, and the sacrificial serviceis abolished due to its destruction, even the service involvingthe lamps will be abolished. So, how can the Midrash claimthat the lamps will illuminate the face of the menorah forever?Therefore, the Ramban explains that HKB”H’s statement refers toParshas Behaaloscha 5775 1

the Chanukah candles that HKB”H would establish in the futurethrough the priestly Chashmonaim, the descendants of Aharon.They exist forever; for, even during times of galut, we fulfill themitzvah of lighting the Chanukah candles.One Who Wants to Become Wise Should FaceSouth for the Menorah Is Located in the SouthSeeing as it is the nature of Torah to be elucidated in seventydifferent ways, it appears that we can interpret the Midrash basedon what we have learned in the Gemara (B.B. 25b): “הרוצה שיחכים וסימניך שלחן בצפון , “בתפלתו יחזיר פניו לדרום”] ושיעשיר יצפין : ידרים [רש”י ” —ומנורה בדרום a person who wants to become wise shouldface south, while a person who wants to become wealthyshould face north; and your mnemonic is: The “shulchan”stood in the north, while the “menorah” stood in the south.Rashi comments that the Gemara means that he should facethat particular direction when davening. The Gemara providesclarification. It doesn’t mean that one should completely facesouth while davening; for, a person must face east—the directionof Yerushalayim and the location of the Mikdash. Rather, a personshould deviate slightly to the south while davening, correspondingto the location of the menorah, which stood in the southern partof the Sanctuary.This teaches us that by kindling the menorah, Aharon wasprivileged to extend the radiance and illumination of the Torah toYisrael, as it is written (Mishlei 6, 23): ” —“כי נר מצוה ותורה אור fora mitzvah is a lamp and the Torah is light. Let us suggest thatthat is the reason HKB”H chose Aharon HaKohen to kindle themenorah. Who better to provide Yisrael with the influence of theTorah! Attesting to Aharon’s character, the navi states (Malachi2, 6): בשלום ובמישור הלך אתי , “תורת אמת היתה בפיהו ועולה לא נמצא בשפתיו כי שפתי כהן ישמרו דעת ותורה יבקשו מפיהו כי מלאך ה’ צבאות , ורבים השיב מעון ” הוא -- the Torah of truth was in his mouth, and injustice wasnot found on his lips; he walked with Me in peace and withfairness, and turned many away from iniquity. For the lips ofthe Kohen should safeguard knowledge, and people shouldseek teaching from his mouth; for he is an agent of Hashem,Master of Legions.Upon careful scrutiny, we begin to appreciate the extent ofAharon HaKohen’s kedushah. By kindling the menorah in theMishkan, he endowed Yisrael with the illumination of the Torah.He did so not only during the times of the Beis HaMikdash—whenthe menorah was actually lit—but even after the “churban.” For,whenever a Jew wishes to become wise with Torah, he simplyneeds to follow Chazal’s advice: ” —“הרוצה שיחכים ידרים he shouldface slightly to the south, corresponding to the location of themenorah in the Beis HaMikdash. By doing so, he will draw fromthe magnificent light that was kindled there and will attain thewisdom of the Torah.Now, we have a very nice interpretation and betterunderstanding of the Midrash. After not having participated in thekorbanosof the “nesiim,” HKB”H consoled Aharon as follows: “Donot despair; you are destined for something greater . . . Whilethe Beis HaMikdash exists, the korbanoswill be offered”—but after the “churban,” it will no longer be possible to actuallyoffer korbanot; “the lamps, however, will face the center of themenorah forever”—for, even after the “churban,” whenever aJew prays and faces slightly to the south, he will successfully drawfrom the light of the Torah inherent in the lamps that were kindledduring the times of the Beis HaMikdash.A Brilliant Idea fromRabbi Michel of Zlotchov, zy”aContinuing onward and upward along this exalted path,let us endeavor to explain why HKB”H commanded us to lightspecifically seven lamps. Additionally, we will explain why HKB”Hcommanded us to kindle the six lamps in such a manner that theywould all face the center of the menorah, the middle lamp. Wewill refer to a precious introduction presented by the Torei Zahav(Ki Tisa), authored by the great Rabbi Binyamin of Zalozce, citingRabbi Michel of Zlotchov, zy”a. He addresses the passuk in ourparsha: ” “ויעש כן אהרן אל מול פני המנורה העלה נרותיה כאשר צוה ה’ את משה - Aharon did so; toward the face of the menorah he kindledits lamps, as Hashem had commanded Moshe. Citing the Sifrei,Rashi comments: ” —“להגיד שבחו של אהרן שלא שינה to tell the praiseof Aharon--that he did not deviate. Here is what he writes: “שמעתי אומרים משם הרב המובהק איש אלקי מוהר”ר יחיאל מיכל נר”ו על וברש”י להגיד שבחו , ויעש כן אהרן כאשר צוה ד’ את משה , הפסוק בפרשת בהעלותך ומפרש הוא נרו יאיר על פי . ומקשים היאך סלקא דעתך שישנה , של אהרן שלא שינה אלא אחד מחלק השמיני שבשכל , דאיתא דאין הדיבור יכול להכיל כל השכל של אדם . ולא אפשר לאדם לדבר כל השכל שלו , אדם אי אפשר לו להבין כל השכל , ולפי זה כשאדם מדבר לחבירו שיעשה איזה שכל אם כן אי אפשר לו לעשות כפי השכל , רק הדיבור לבד שהוא חלק השמיני , של המדבר אבל , שהדיבור של ראובן נעשה שכל אצל שמעון , של המדבר רק כפי השגת הדיבור ועושה , אזי מבין מתוך דיבורו של ראובן גם השכל של ראובן , אם שמעון הוא חכם גדול . עד כאן תורף דברי הספר הנ”ל , בשכל שלו כמו שראובן מבין וכוונתו כפי השגת משה רבינו , והנה בודאי הקב”ה אמר למשה מעשה המנורה וכשאמר זה לאהרן לא היה באפשרי לדבר לו כל השכל רק אחד מחלק , עליו השלום אבל מפני שאהרן , ולא היה אפשר לאהרן לעשות כמו שצוה יתברך למשה , השמיני Parshas Behaaloscha 5775 2

וזהו שאמר , היה חכם גדול היה מבין מתוך דיבורו השכל של משה כמו שצוה לו יתברך רצונו לומר כמו שהיה הציווי למשה מיתברך , ויעש כן אהרן כאשר צוה ד’ את משה כי היה חכם גדול ומבין מתוך , וזה להגיד שבחו של אהרן שלא שינה , כן עשה אהרן .” דיבורו של משה כמו שצוה לו יתברך The commentaries ask: How could one possibly imaginethat Aharon would deviate from the command. He providesan explanation based on the concept that a person’s speechcannot contain or transmit all of a person’s intelligence; itcan only convey one-eighth of his intelligence; and a personcannot convey all of his intelligence verbally.So, when a person tells a colleague to perform a particularintelligent act, the colleague cannot fully comprehend theperson’s instruction fully; he can only grasp one-eighth ofthe intent, the spoken word. Therefore, he cannot fulfill thespeaker’s full intent but only the part he grasps from the spokenword. Reuven’s verbal instruction becomes part of Shimon’sintellect. If, however, Shimon is extremely wise, he can deducefrom Reuven’s spoken word his intelligence, as well. Thus, hecan use his own intellect to act in accordance with Reuven’sintent. This concludes Rabbi Michel’s concept.Now, HKB”H certainly explained to Moshe the constructionand function of the menorah, to the best of Moshe’sunderstanding. When he transmitted the information toAharon, it was impossible to convey any more than oneeighth of the information. So, it was impossible for Aharonto do exactly as the Almighty commanded Moshe. Yet, sinceAharon was extremely wise, he perceived from Moshe’swords, the information the Almighty had commanded him.This is the meaning of the statement: “Aharon did so . . .as Hashem had commanded Moshe.” The Torah wishes toteach us that Aharon acted in accordance with the commandthe Almighty gave to Moshe. This informs us of Aharon’sgreatness—he did not deviate. For, he was extremely wise,and understood from Moshe’s verbal instruction, the intentof the Almighty’s command.We should note that this concept—that a person’s speechcan only convey one-eighth of his actual knowledge and intent—comes from a very early source; it comes from the Sefer HaKanahattributed to the divine Tanna, Rabbi Nechunya ben HaKanah.His concept is presented by the Bnei Yissaschar in his sefer AgraD’Kallah (Ki Savo) as follows: אינו , “כי כל דבר מושכל שיש לאדם במחשבה ” —יכול להלבישו באותיות הדיבור רק חלק שמיני any intelligence presentin a person’s mind can only be articulated in letters of speechto the extent of one-eighth.HKB”H Revealed in the TorahOnly One-eighth of the Torah’s WisdomLike a servant in the presence of his master, I would like toapply Rabbi Michel’s concept to explain Chazal’s statement above:” —“הרוצה שיחכים ידרים one who wishes to become wise shouldface south—because the menorah was located in the south. Asexplained, by kindling the menorah, Aharon extended the light ofthe Torah, in keeping with the passuk: ” —“כי נר מצוה ותורה אור basedon that which is written (Iyov 19, 26): ” —“ומבשרי אחזה אלוק frommy flesh I see G-d.Our holy sources provide the following explanation. We havean explicit passuk stating (Bereishis 1, 26): “נעשה אדם בצלמנו ” כדמותנו -- and G-d said, “Let us make man in our image, as ourlikeness.” HKB”H wanted man to perceive with his own intellecthow HKB”H manifests Himself in creation—His “midot” and howHe runs the world. The great Rabbi Tzaddok HaKohen, zy”a,writes the following in Machashavos Charutz (1): “וידוע דכל מה וכל השגות בני אדם , שלמעלה כן הוא למטה בנפש האדם שהוא כצלמינו כדמותינו .” הוא בדמות אדם כי מבשרי אחזה אלוק כנודע Know that everything upabove also exists down below in man’s being; for he was created“in our image, as our likeness.” And all that human beingsperceive, is contained in man’s likeness, because “from my fleshI see G-d,” as we know.In a similar vein, the Sefas Emes writes (Vayeira): “ומבשרי אחזה , אם כן יוכל האדם להכיר את בוראו מעצמותו , כי הנה כתיב נעשה אדם בצלמינו . אלקי .” “ וכן כתבו המפרשים במאמר (אבות פ”ב מ”א) דע מה למעלה ממך From myflesh I see G-d.” For, it is written: “Let us make man in ourimage.” That being the case, man can know his Creator fromhis own self. The commentaries provide a similar explanationregarding the statement (Avos 2, 1): “Know what is above you.”In other words, you can perceive how HKB”H runs the world fromabove (” )“דע מה למעלה by examining your own self (” )“ממך . After all,HKB”H created you in His image and likeness.Now, if HKB”H created man in this manner—such that heis only capable of expressing one-eighth of his intellectualcomprehension through his speech—then it stands to reason—based on the notion of ” —“דע מה למעלה ממך that HKB”H also onlyrevealed to us via the words of the Torah one-eighth of whathe intended to reveal. Without a doubt, there is no limit ormeasure to HKB”H’s intelligence. Yet, we are saying that Heonly revealed to us verbally, so to speak, one-eighth of what Hethought to convey to us. He did so, so that we would labor toascertain the other seven parts that were not revealed by thewords of the Torah.Parshas Behaaloscha 5775 3

Seven Lamps corresponding to the SevenConcealed Parts of the TorahBy Lighting the Menorah AharonDrew upon the “Ohr HaGanuz”Now, let us address HKB”H’s command to Aharon: “בהעלותך את ” הנרות אל מול פני המנורה יאירו שבעת הנרות -- When you kindle the lamps,toward the face of the menorah shall the seven lamps cast light.First, however, let us explain the Gemara’s statement: “הרוצה שיחכים ” – ידרים a person who wishes to become wise should face thesouth--symbolized by the fact that ” —“מנורה בדרום the menorah waslocated in the southern part of the Heichal. This indicates that themenorah alludes to the light of the Torah. We can challenge thisstatement based on an elucidation in the Midrash (S.R. 34, 2): “ועשו אמר לו ,’ מפני מה בכל הכלים האלה כתיב ‘ועשית’ ובארון כתיב ‘ועשו ארון , ארון ” יבואו הכל ויעסקו בארון כדי שיזכו כולם לתורה , —הקב”ה why does the Torahemploy the term ’ “—‘ועשית and you shall make”—with regardsto all of the vessels; yet, with regards to the Aron, it employsthe term ’ “—‘ועשו and they shall make”? HKB”H said to him: Leteveryone come and occupy themselves with the Aron, so thatthey may all have access to the Torah. According to the Midrash,the making of the Aron already alludes to the Torah. So, for whatpurpose did HKB”H command the kindling of the menorah, whichalso alludes to the light of Torah?This idea agrees beautifully with a familiar notion fromthe sphere of “drush”—interpretations of Scriptures based onelucidation and homiletics. In Chanukas HaTorah (Behaaloscha),an explanation is presented in the name of the great Rabbi Heschelof Cracow, ztz”l, regarding Rashi’s comment in the name of theSifri on the passuk: “ויעש כן אהרן אל מול פני המנורה העלה נרותיה כאשר צוה .” להגיד שבחו של אהרן שלא שינה - ה’ את משה Aharon is praised for notdeviating from Hashem’s command. There is an obvious difficultywith this comment. For, it is unimaginable that Aharon HaKohenwould deviate one iota from a directive issued by Hashem.It appears that we can propose an answer. The Aron, whichhoused the two “Luchos HaBris,” alludes to Torah she’b’chsav—thewritten Torah. For, the Aseres HaDibros inscribed on the two Luchosare an integral part of Torah she’b’chsav; they are written down bothin parshas Yitro and parshas Vaetchanan. In contrast, the kindlingof the menorah alludes to Torah she’b’al peh—the oral Torah. Infact, the Chatam Sofer writes in Toras Moshe (Behaaloscha) thatthe six branches which emerge from the two sides of the menorahcorrespond to the six orders of the Mishnah, which comprise Torahshe’b’al peh. The six orders of the Mishnah are enumerated in theGemara (Shabbas 31a): טהרות , קדשים , נזיקין , נשים , מועד , זרעים .This explains very nicely why HKB”H commanded the kindlingof seven lamps on the menorah. The Aron containing the two“Luchos HaBris” represent Torah she’b’chsav, which HKB”H gave usword for word on Har Sinai. It constitutes the one part out of eightthat HKB”H revealed to us via Torah she’b’chsav. Thus, it turns outthat it is incumbent upon us to reveal the other seven parts thatwere not revealed openly in Torah she’b’chsav. Therefore, HKB”Hcommanded the kindling of the seven lamps of the menorah. Byperforming this service, Aharon HaKohen accessed the sevenparts that were not revealed explicitly in Torah she’b’chsav butwere only accessible via Torah she’b’al peh.He explains the matter based on a question posed in the Zoharhakadosh (Part 1, 264a). In the depiction of creation, the phrase” “– “ויהי כן and it was so”--appears after every stage of creation.Yet, regarding the creation of the light, it merely states (Bereishis1, 3): ” —“ויאמר אלקים יהי אור ויהי אור G-d said, “Let there be light”;and there was light. The phrase ” “ויהי כן is noticeably absent. TheZohar explains that the magnificent light that was created on thefirst day was stored away by HKB”H for the tzaddikim le’asid la’vo.So, when HKB”H proclaimed ” “—“יהי אור let there be light”—He wasreferring to the magnificent light He originally created. Therefore,the phrase ” “ויהי כן does not appear, because, in truth, it was not so.The magnificent light was subsequently stored away. Therefore,the Torah simply states: ” “ויהי אור . In other words, there was light,but it was not the magnificent light that was created originally.The kabbalistic texts, however, posit that Aharon HaKohensucceeded in drawing from the “ohr haganuz”—the concealedlight—that was created during the six days of creation by meansof the kindling of the menorah. It turns out, therefore, that bylighting the menorah, it was as if Aharon returned the term ” “כן thatis absent from text regarding the creation of the light. After all, hedrew the “ohr haganuz” back down to earth. As a result, Hashem’swill was fulfilled with regards to the proclamation of ” ;“יהי אור theoriginal, magnificent light was once again part of creation. Thisthen is the deeper significance inherent in the statement: “ויעש כן ” אהרן . Aharon rectified the word ” “כן that was absent with regardsto the creation of the light by drawing upon the magnificent lightthat had been concealed away.The message of the Sifrei is now quite clear: “להגיד שבחו של אהרן ” שלא שינה . In other words, due to his actions, the creation of thelight no longer deviated from the rest of creation. The phrase ”ויהי

specifically seven lamps. Additionally, we will explain why HKB”H commanded us to kindle the six lamps in such a manner that they would all face the center of the menorah, the middle lamp. We will refer to a precio

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Faces: j 5. Faces: 8 6. Faces: 20 Edges: 15 Edges: j Edges: 30 Vertices: 9 Vertices: 6 Vertices: j Use Euler’s Formula to find the number of vertices in each polyhedron described below. 7. 6 square faces 8. 5 faces: 1 rectangle 9. 9 faces: 1 octagon and 4 triangles and 8 triangles Verify Euler’s Formula for each polyhedron.Then draw a net .

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.