1 Of 22 1999 ENGINEERING DATA TRANSMlmAL 140135 I
A .@JUN 2 2 19991140135Page 1 ofENGINEERING DATA TRANSMlmAL2. To: (Receiving Organization)3. From: (Originating Organization)4. Related EDT No.:DISTRIBUTIONCOGEMA Engineering corp.5. Proj.lProg.lDept.1Div.:6. Desigrl AuthorityIDesignAgenVCog. Engr.:RPP/SY Farm annulus leak det.RW Reed/R Akundo/JH HuberIN/A7. Purchase Order No.:9. Equip.1Component No.:N/A10. SystemlBldg./Facility:241-SY12. Major Assm. Dwg. No.:16. pprovat Designator (F)KEYIReason for Transmittal ( G )IIDisposition (H) 8 (1)9nCtrl No.0Approved0Approved wlcomments0Disapproved wlcommenlsED-7400-172-2 (10197)ED-7400-172-1 107191)
HNF-4634, Rev. 0Test PlanforNew SY Farm Annulus Leak DetectorsRobert AbundoCOGEMA Engineering Corp.Richland, WA 99352US. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC06-96RL13200EDTIECN: 140135Org Code: si700B&RCode: N/Au c : 2000Charge Code: 1 0 6 7 7 3Total Pages:Key Words: test plan, leak detector, SY Farm, double shell tanks, ENRAF.Abstract: This document provides a plan for testing a new annulus leakdetection device in the annulus of the waste storage tank 241 SY-102TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER. Reference herein to any specific wmmercial product. process, or service by trade name,trademark. manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily wnstitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation. orfavoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof or its wntractors or subcontractors.Printed in the United States of America. To obtain copies of this document, contact: Document Control Services,P.O. Box 950, Mailstop H6-08. Richland WA 99352, Phone (509) 372-2420; Fax (509) 376-4989.Release StampApproved For Public ReleaseA-6400-073.1 (10/97)
“F-4634Rev.0TESTPLANFORNEWSY FARMANNULUSLEAKDETECTORSTABLE OF 10.011.012.0.OBJECTIVE.SCOPE .DESCRIPTION OF TEST.INTRODUCTIONTESTITEM.T E S T E OMENTN .EQUrpmw AND F A C s. DATA.CRITERIA/ C O N S .S.TEST PROCEDURE.SAFETY .QUALITY ASSURANCE.ORGANIZATIONAND FUNCTION RESPONSIBILITIES.SCHEDULE.REPORTS.REFERENCES .EXPECTED RESULTS11122222333344445
“F-4634Rev.0Test Plan for New SY Farm Annulus Leak DetectorsINTRODUCTION1.0This document is a plan for testing a newly installed annulus leak detector ( L D ) in theannulus of an SY Tank, specifically 241-SY-102. One Enraf-Nonius 854 ATG levelgauge will be initially installed for verification that the gauge will meet the requirementsfor annulus leak detection. Upon completion of a successful test, eight additional EnrafNonius 854 ATG level gauges will be installed in the three SY Farm Double Shell Tanks@ST). There will be a total of nine level gauges installed in the SY tank Farm whenwork is completed. The three annulus leak detectors in each tank will be locatedapproximately 120 degrees apart.The 854 operates on the principal of buoyancy and uses a displacer suspended by a smalldiameter steel alloy wire. In liquid, the 854 measures level to an accuracy of 0.04 incheswith a repeatability of 0.004 inches. For leak detection application it is necessary todetect a change from dry floor to some minimum level of liquid accumulation. Since theprincipal of operation is buoyancy, sufficient liquid must be present to “float” thedisplacer before a change in level is detected. Testing of this minimum detectable level isthe first step in this activity (Scaief 99). The displacer was redesigned for increasedsensitivity by using a formula given by the manufacturer. For reference, see “Instructionmanual series 854 ATG level gauge.”2.0OBJECTIVEThe objective of this testing is to demonstrate that the Enraf-Nonius 854 ATG levelgauge is stable and will not cause spurious alarms at the TMACS operator stations. Alsothat there are no unforeseen obstacles in its use as a leak detector.3.0SCOPEThis test includes preliminary testing and monitoring of one Enraf 854 level gauge in theannulus of SY-102. The gauge will be connected via an Enraf Communication InterfaceUnit (CIU) to the Tank Monitor and Control System (TMACS).During the testing phase the device will not be used for satisfying the requirements ofLimiting Conditions for Operation @CO) 3.2.6 as defined in the Technical SafetyRequirements (TSR).1
HNF-4634 Rev. 04.04.1DESCRIPTION OF TESTTest ItemEnraf-Nonius 854 ATG level gauge with SPU 11hard alarm output contact card installed,and a modified displacer, which is suspended by a wire on a measuring drum. A forcetransducer measures the weight of the displacer. The actual output value of the forcetransducer is compared with a desired value for the apparent weight of the displacer. If adiscrepancy exists between measured and desired value a software control adjusts theposition of the stepper motor.A modified displacer with a larger base diameter was confirmed to achieve the acceptablealarm level’. The acceptable alarm level is 0.25 with a -0.125 to 0.25 tolerance (Huber99).4.2Test EnvironmentThe level gauge will be installed on Riser-033 of tank 241-SY-102, under normalambient conditions. The design ambient temperature ranges for the equipment is:OutdoorBuildings-25F to 115F50F to 95FThe Enraf 854 is rated for operation over a temperature range of -40F to 185F.4.3Equipment and FacilitiesThe test unit will be installed in Riser-033 of tank 241-SY-102. An ENRAF CIU will beinstalled in instrument building 241-SY-271.No special tools are needed for the initial test. This test is to see if the Enraf level gaugeis stable and the output does not drift.4.4DataTest data are collected and stored by a computer (via TMACS), which later can be usedfor reference. The fYequency at which data are stored is every one-minute. This testingprocess is scheduled for 30 days.’ H-2-817634 paa #89 as added by ECN 649073 2
HNF-4634 Rev. 04.5Criteria /ConstraintsNo alarms are expected. If however, an alarm has occurred before the end of the 30-daytrial, the cognizant engineer will review the test results and determine what caused it. Thetest will continue unless otherwise halted by the cognizant engineer.Prior to starting the test, all needed instruments must be checked for functionality andcalibrated as required.5.0EXPECTED RESULTSA successful test would be if there are no unexplained spurious alarms and the levelremains constant.6.0TEST PROCEDUREBefore starting any test with the Enraf level gauge, make sure all required equipment isproperly checked.The following procedure steps assume that the test performer is familiar with the EN&Nonius 854 ATG level gauge and that the “Instruction manual series 854 ATG levelgauge” and “Instruction manual SPU 11 Hard alarm output contacts” are available forreference.1.0Follow the installation and setup procedure steps for the level gauge specified inthe work package 2W-99-738M.2.0Perform TMACS ATP WHC-SD-WM-ATP-023, Rev. 7.3.0Engineer to periodically review TMACS history file during the test.4.0Run test for 30 days.7.0SAFETYNo unique or unusual industrial, radiological, chemical, fire, release o f energy, orcriticality safety hazards is involved with performing or supporting these tests.3
HNF-4634 Rev.08.0QUALITY ASSURANCEA Quality Assurance representative shall review this document as well as the test reportwhen it is prepared. QA will also be involved in shop ATP testing as well as the TMACSATP.QA will be present during the ATP setup and as required.9.0ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTION RESPONSIBILITIESThe following group will perform the task assigned to each one.Maintenance - Maintenance personnel will perform the initial- installation of the EnrafNonius 854 level gauge and inspect it for functionality.Operations - The Operations personnel will do any routine (or round) work for the levelgauge.Process Control -Process control personnel are responsible for setting up TMACS (TankMonitoring and Control System) to read the level gauge and making sure that data aregathered and stored.Quality Assurance - QA will be responsible for reviewing test results and accepting CGIform.Engineering - Engineering (COGEMA / NHC / LMHC) is responsible for providing thedesign and supporting the installation, test and the maintenance of the level gauge.10.0 SCHEDULETesting will start after this Test Plan is approved and after the construction work in thefield is complete. Testing will last for 30 days, after which the test data will be evaluatedand the test report prepared.11.0 REPORTSA Test Report will be generated after all testing is done.4
HNF-4634 Rev.012.0 REFERENCESEnraf Inc., Instruction Manual Series 854 ATGLevel Gauge, Part No. 4416.220, Version2.2, March 1996 (See CV-31560, vendor information file).Huber, J. H., Test report for ENRAF annulus leak detector development, "F-4328,Revision 0, dated May 25, 1999.Scaief III, C. C., Engineering task plan for new SY Farm annulus leak detectors, TWR4092, Revision 0, dated June 1, 1999.5
DISTRIBUTION SHEETToPageDISTRIBUTIONProject Titlework OrderNameR. AbundoM.H. Brownm.y?l.K . E. CarpenterIG.IICrummelM.IG. W. GaultJ. H. HuberMSlNTextWith AllAttach.L6-37XT4-07XR3-47XR1-51.R1-44IIT4-07I L.S. KrogsrudID.C. LarsenIR. E. RavmondI1IT4-07T4-08G1-54XXIIIXXXXD. RickenbachH1-19XC. C. Scaief I11R1-56XM.of1Date6/17/99EDT No.140135Attach”AppendixOnlvText OnlyEDTIECNOnlyIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIXT4-07R. W. Reed1 IR. L. SchlosserIR. R. True IIE. LarsonC. OtenT4-07IIXX1IIIIIIIIIIIIIII L6-37W. E. WillinghamIR.IT.R1-561.IT4-07R1-56XIIXXA-6000-135 (10197)
Enraf-Nonius 854 ATG level gauge with SPU 11 hard alarm output contact card installed, and a modified displacer, which is suspended by a wire on a measuring drum. A force transducer measures the weight of the displacer. The actual output value of the force transducer is compared with a des
10.1 Liquiça Church Massacre (April 6, 1999) 10.2 Cailaco Killings (April 12, 1999) 10.3 Carrascalão House Massacre (April 17, 1999) 10.4 The Killing of Two Students at Hera (May 20, 1999) 10.5 Arbitrary Detention and Rape in Lolotoe (May-June 1999) 10.6 Attack on UNAMET Maliana (June 19, 1999) 10.7 Attack on Humanitarian Convoy (July 4, 1999)
Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Production Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Textile Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Civil Engineering, other related Engineering discipline Energy Resources Engineering (ERE) The students’ academic background should be: Mechanical Power Engineering, Energy .
Applied Mathematics Grade 10. Final bound resource June 1, 1999 Teacher Resource Manual in three. stages August 1999, October 1999, December 1999. Applied Mathematics Grade 11. Entire manuscript June 15, 1999. Entire preprint document without. colour August 15, 1999 Final bound resource June 1, 2000.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD – GRASSCYCLING FOLLOW-UP SURVEY 2 Dates Los Angeles September 7-19, 1999 Napa September 16-27, 1999 Contra Costa October 3-24, 1999 Riverside November 9-29, 1999 San Bernardino November 17-29, 1999 Solano November 26 – December 2, 1999 The primary purposes of the survey were to follow up on a
Yellow Book 1999 – Conditions of Contract for Plant and Design Build, for Electrical and Mechanical Plant, and for Building and Engineering Works Designed by the Contractor (first Ed 1999). Silver Book 1999 – Conditions of Contract for EPC/Turn Key Projects (first Ed 1999). Green Book 1999 –
Careers in Engineering Guide the brighter choice. Contents ABOUT LSBU 4–5 BUILDING SERVICES ENGINEERING 6–7 CHEMICAL AND PETROLEUM ENGINEERING 8–9 CIVIL ENGINEERING 10–11 ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 12–13 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING 14–15 MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING 16–17 PRODUCT DESIGN ENGINEERING 18–19 An engineering degree is a big challenge to take on. There is no denying .
OLE MISS ENGINEERING RECOMMENDED COURSE SCHEDULES Biomedical engineering Chemical engineering Civil engineering Computer engineering Computer science Electrical engineering General engineering Geological engineering Geology Mechanical engineering Visit engineering.olemiss.edu/advising for full course information.
Table IV.A.2 Asset Limits for Recipients, July 1999 112 Table IV.A.3 Income Eligibility Tests for Recipients, July 1999 116 Table IV.B.1 Family Cap Provisions, July 1999 118 Table IV.C.1 State Time Limit Policies, July 1999 120 Ta
