REFERENCES - UPI Repository

95REFERENCESAfrianto., Indrayani, L., & Seomantri, S. (2014). Transitivity analysis onShakespeare‟s sonnets. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science.19(1). 78-85. Retrieved from www.iosrjournals.org. on June 15th, 2015 at08.30.Al-Massri, I. (2013). Text, linguistics and translation: English-Arabic MachineTranslation Assessment. 1st Ed. CreateSpace Independent PublishingPlatform. (ISBN-10: 1482352133; ISBN-13: 978-1482352139).Anderson, M., & Anderson, K. (1997). Text types in English 2. Macmillan: SouthYarra.Andriyani, N. (2008). Transitivity process in worldview’s articles of Newsweek.Unpublished thesis at University of North Sumatera. Retrieved fromrepository.usu.ac.id. on June 6th, 2015 at 11.00.Arancón, P. R. (2013). The use of SFL genre theory for the analysis of students‟writing skills in ESP. Volumen Monográfico. 245-252. Universidad Nacionalde Educación a Distancia (UNED).Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh:University of Pitsburgh Press.Beck, S. W., & Jeffery, J. V. (2009). Genre and thinking in academic writing tasks.Journal of Literacy Research, 41, 228-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10862960902908483.Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (1995). The functional analysis of English. 3rd Ed. Abingdon:Routledge.Bloor, T. & Bloor, M., (2013). The Functional Analysis of English (Third Edition).London and New York: Routledge.Brooks, J. (2009-2010). The growing absurdity of the South African apartheid:transitivity in Christopher Van Wyk‟s „In Detention‟. Innervate LeadingUndergraduate Work in Studies, 2, 26-34.Budairi, A. (2015). Revisiting the 2006 school level curriculum and the genre-basedapproach in the context of EFL curriculum development in Indonesia. AhmadDahlan Journal of English Studies (ADJES), 2(3), 31-38.Wida Mulyanti, 2015TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM IN EXPOSITION TEXTS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONALEXAMINATIONSUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

96Butt, D., Fahey, R, S., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using functionalgrammar: an explorer’s guide. 2nd Ed. Sydney: National Centre for EnglishTeaching and Research. Macquarie University.Butt, D., Fahey, R, S., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2003). 3rd Ed. Usingfunctional grammar: an explorer’s guide. Sydney: National Centre forEnglish Teaching and Research. Macquarie University.Bustam, M. (2011). Analyzing clause by Halliday‟s transitivity system. Jurnal IlmuSastra. 6(1). 22-34.Caffarel, A., Martin, J. R., & Matthiessen, M. I. M. (2004). Language typology: afunctional perspective. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Caili, W. (2005). The process of transitivity in “weeping for my smoking daughter”.Celea Journal. 28(1). 111-115.Coffin, C. (2001). Theoretical approaches to written language: TESOL perspective.In A. Burns and C. Coffin (eds), Analysing English in a global context: Areader (pp. 93-122). London: Routledge.Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluatingquantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.Depdiknas. (2003). Kurikulum 2004. Standar kompetensi. Mata pelajaran bahasaInggris. Sekolah Menengah Atas dan Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Depdiknas.Depdiknas. (2006). Standar isi. Mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris. Sekolah MenengahAtas dan Madrasah Aliyah. Jakarta: Depdiknas. Retrieved from Badan standarnasional pendidikan Indonesia. Retrieved from http://bsnp-indonesia.org/id/?page id 103/ on June 17th, 2015, at 09.45.Derewianka, B. M. (2011). A new grammar companion for teachers. (2nd ed.).Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.Derewianka, B. M. & Jones, P. (2013). Teaching language in context. Melbourne:Oxford University Press.Droga L., & Humphrey, S. (2003) Grammar and Meaning: An Introduction forPrimary Teachers. Berry, NSW: Target Texts.Wida Mulyanti, 2015TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM IN EXPOSITION TEXTS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONALEXAMINATIONSUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

97Dymock, S., & Nicholson, T. (2010). High 5! Strategy to enhance comprehending ofexpository text. The Reading Teacher. 64(3). 166-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.3.2.Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: PrinterPublishers, Ltd.Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. 2nd Ed. London:Printer Publishers, Ltd.Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre-based approach to teaching academic writing in atertiary EFL context in Indonesia. Volume 1. A PhD thesis submitted to theDepartment of Language, Literacy and Arts Education, Faculty of Education,The University of Melbourne.Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan Genre-Based dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris:Petunjuk Untuk Guru. Bandung: Rizqi Press.Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Dunia Pustaka Jaya.Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Textual analysis for social research.London: Routledge.Fang, Z. & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas. Alanguage-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Flood, J. (1986). The text, the student, and the teacher: learning from exposition inmiddle schools. The Reading Teacher. 39(8), 784-791.Frawley, J. (2003). International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Volume 3. OxfordUniversity Press, New York: Alan McKee. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857020017.Fowler, W. S. (1985). New froficiency English. Book Three. Edinburg: Nelson.Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar. Cammeray,NSW: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.Ginting, M. (2015). An analysis of students’ analytical expositions. Unpublishedthesis at Department of English Literature, Faculty of Languages and Arts,Indonesia University of Education. Retrieved from repository.upi.edu. on May20th, 2015 at 07.30.Wida Mulyanti, 2015TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM IN EXPOSITION TEXTS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONALEXAMINATIONSUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

98Halliday, M.A.K. (1971). Linguistic function and literary style: an enquiry into thelanguage of William Golding's 'The Inheritors'. In Seymor Chatman (ed),Literary style: A symposium, 330-65. London: Oxford University Press.Halliday, M.A.K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Text as semantic choice in social context. In T. A. VanDyck & J. Petrofi (Eds.). Grammars and descriptions. Berlin: de Gruyter.Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation ofLanguage and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Halliday, M. A. K. (1979) Modes of meaning and modes of expression: types ofgrammatical structure, and their determination by different semanticfunctions. In D. J. Allerton, E. Carney, and D. Holdcroft (eds.), Function andContext in Linguistic Analysis: a Festschrift for William Haas. London:Cambridge University Press, 57-79.Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, context, and text: aspects oflanguage in a social-semiotic perspective. Geelong, Victoria: DeakinUniversity Press. [Republished by Oxford University Press 1989].Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London:Edward Arnold.Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functionalgrammar. 3th Ed. London: Arnold.Halliday, M. A. K. (2006). The language of science: collected works of M. A. K.Halliday (Volume 5). London & New York: Continuum.Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An introduction to functionalgrammar. 4th Ed. London: Routledge.Heigham, J., & Crocker, R. A. (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: Apractical introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Huang, S. C. (2006). Semiotic view of information: semiotics as a foundation of LISresearch in information behavior. In Grove, Andrew, Ed. Proceedings of the69th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science andTechnology (ASIST) 43, Austin (US).Wida Mulyanti, 2015TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM IN EXPOSITION TEXTS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONALEXAMINATIONSUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

99Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: technologies for teachingand assessing writing. New South Wales: University of New South WalesPress, Ltd.Lipson, M. (2006) Exploring functional grammar. Bologna: Centro di StudiLinguistico-Culturali (CeSLiC), p. 138. DOI 10.6092/unibo/amsacta/871.Machin, D., & Mayr. (2012) How to do critical discourse analysis: a multimodalintroduction. London: Sage Publication. Ltd.Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology anddesign. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Mandasari, R. W. (2005). An Analysis of six types of transitivity process in Kanggururadio English script. Unpublished thesis at University of North Sumatera.Retrieved from repository. usu.ac.id. on June 15th, 2015 at 08.30.Martin, J.R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality.Geelong: Deakin University Press.Martin, J.R., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & C. Painter. (1997). Working withFunctional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Martin, J.R. (1992) English text: system and structure. Philadelphia and Amsterdam:John Benjamins.Martin, J. R. (1993). Genre and literacy: Modeling context in educational linguistics.Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141-172.Martin, J.R., (1997). Analysing genre: functional parameters. In F. Christie & J. R.Martin (1997). (EDS). Genre and Institions. London: Continuum.Martin, J.R. (2000). 'Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English', inEvaluation in Text, Hunston, S. & Thompson, G. (eds), Oxford, OxfordUniversity Press.Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2003). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond theclause. London: Continuum.Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London:Equinox. Martin, J.R., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & C. Painter. (1997).Working with functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.McGregor, W. (2009). Linguistics: An introduction. London: Continuum.Wida Mulyanti, 2015TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM IN EXPOSITION TEXTS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONALEXAMINATIONSUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu