13 Noise And Vibration - Metro Tunnel

2y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
6.58 MB
83 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Oscar Steel
Transcription

13 Noise and Vibration13.1OverviewThis chapter provides an assessment of the noise and vibration impacts associatedwith the construction and operation of Melbourne Metro. The chapter is based on theimpact assessment presented in Technical Appendix I Noise and Vibration. Allrelevant references are provided in the technical appendices.As a large, busy and dynamic city, Melbourne hosts a range of activities – suchas major construction projects, heavy vehicle traffic, train and tram operationsand outdoor events – that generate varying types and levels of noise andvibration. Across the Melbourne Metro alignment, many buildings, facilities andplaces already experience continuous or intermittent levels of noise and vibrationassociated with being located near to major arterial roads, tram or train lines. Theconstruction and operation of Melbourne Metro would occur within this context.Noise and vibration may be perceptible at receivers near the Melbourne Metroalignment as: Airborne noise (noise propagated through the air from source to receiver) Ground-borne vibration (vibration propagated through the ground and intobuilding structures) Ground-borne noise (noise heard within a building that is generated byvibration propagated through the ground and into the structure).The extent of the project’s noise and vibration impacts would depend upon arange of factors. Some factors would be influenced by the design of the project(such as the construction methodologies adopted and the measuresimplemented to meet the Environmental Performance Requirements). Otherfactors would depend upon the sensitivity of particular receivers to noise andvibration (such as the structural condition of an affected building or the nature ofthe activities undertaken at a particular receiver).The detailed assessment of the predicted noise and vibration impacts ofMelbourne Metro undertaken for the EES has used conservative assumptionsand models to predict the levels of noise and vibration that would be generatedby the construction and operation of the Concept Design developed forMelbourne Metro. Assessment criteria have been determined by reference toVictorian, Australian and international standards and guidelines. Backgroundmonitoring has been undertaken to measure existing noise and vibrationconditions along the project alignment.The assessment has determined noise and vibration Guideline Targets for theproject to minimise adverse impacts on residents, communities, structures andsensitive equipment and places, as far as practicable.MMRA Environment Effects Statement13–1

These Guideline Targets are specified in the recommended EnvironmentalPerformance Requirements for the project. Appropriate mitigation measures andmanagement actions would be taken during the construction and operation ofMelbourne Metro to meet the targets and achieve the EnvironmentalPerformance Requirements.The key findings of the impact assessment are summarised below.13.1.1ConstructionAirborne noise generated by construction activities would be managed inaccordance with the applicable EPA Guidelines, which are based on protectingresidential premises from unreasonable noise. Construction is expected to beaudible at times but – with appropriate mitigation – is not anticipated to giverise to unreasonable impacts on nearby residents in any of the MelbourneMetro precincts.For tunnelling and station construction, the vibration Guideline Targets forstructural damage set by the Environmental Performance Requirements arepredicted to be achieved with the adoption of appropriate mitigation measuresand construction techniques. Accordingly, no damage to buildings and structuresis anticipated due to vibration arising from the construction of Melbourne Metro.Pre-construction structural condition assessments and ongoing vibrationmonitoring would provide the basis for managing potential structural damage.Tunnelling works also have the potential to generate vibration and ground-bornenoise that may impact on human comfort and amenity. Guideline Targets havebeen identified for Melbourne Metro to manage these potential impacts (withthresholds set far below the vibration levels that would cause any damage tobuildings and structures). There are anticipated to be limited periods of timeduring the construction program when these targets may not be met at somelocations in the Tunnels precinct and in the Parkville, CBD North, CBD South andDomain station precincts.The progress of the TBM would mean that the most-affected sensitive receivers(being locations immediately above or in very close proximity to the tunnelalignment) may experience vibration levels above the Guideline Targets for up to10 days on two occasions (once for the TBM passing in each tunnel) over thecourse of the entire Melbourne Metro construction program. The vibration levelswould slowly increase as the TBM approaches a sensitive receiver, then reach apeak level for a couple of days when the TBM is closest to the receiver. Vibrationlevels would then slowly reduce as the TBM moves on.As roadheader-mined tunnels progress more slowly than TBM-bored tunnels,sensitive receivers at a limited number of locations within the CBD mayexperience vibration levels higher than the Guideline Targets on one occasion ofup to 32 days in the course of the construction program.13–2MMRA Environment Effects Statement

Roadheader excavation of station caverns has the potential to generate vibrationand ground-borne noise that may impact on amenity. Guideline Targets may notbe met at several locations in the CBD North and CBD South station precincts forperiods of up to six weeks, up to three times over the course of the stationcavern construction.Appropriate management actions would be taken to address these temporaryimpacts, including a thorough community consultation and notification process.Where impacts are deemed to be excessive, or where residents are identified asbeing particularly affected by vibration and ground-borne noise impacts, offers fortemporary respite accommodation may be made.Specific Guideline Targets have been set in relation to vibration-sensitiveequipment, Bio-resources facilities and Highly Sensitive Areas (such as hospitalwards and operating theatres) in the Parkville and CBD North station precincts.These sites are already exposed to a level of vibration and in some casesalready have measures in place to protect sensitive equipment. The MelbourneMetro contractor would work closely with the relevant stakeholders to determinehow the predicted levels of vibration from the project would be best managed tolimit impacts on these sensitive areas and equipment. Management actions mayinclude additional vibration attenuation, monitoring of impacts, close collaborationwith equipment operators and/or the temporary relocation of vibration-sensitiveequipment.13.1.2OperationThe recommended Environmental Performance Requirements specify GuidelineTargets that would need to be met during Melbourne Metro’s operation. Airbornenoise, vibration and ground-borne noise levels would need to meet these targets,which align with Victorian, NSW and international criteria and standards.The use of conventional and suitably attenuated track could be adopted to achievecompliance with the operational vibration and ground-borne noise GuidelineTargets and meet the Environmental Performance Requirements. Airborne noiseduring operation would only be experienced as trains enter and exit the tunnelportals and at the western turnback. The effects of this noise would be mitigatedwhere required through measures such as noise barriers in accordance with theVictorian Passenger Rail Infrastructure Noise Policy (PRINP).Accordingly, the long-term noise and vibration effects of Melbourne Metro arepredicted to be low to negligible.MMRA Environment Effects Statement13–3

13.1.3Further monitoring and modellingA series of Environmental Performance Requirements have been recommendedfor the project that specify Guideline Targets for noise and vibration. Theserequirements would need to be met in the design, construction and operation ofMelbourne Metro. Guideline Targets are proposed to be used as criteria fortriggering a management action or mitigation response to address the effects ofnoise and vibration.To provide further confidence in the management of these impacts, theEnvironmental Performance Requirements also mandate the appointment of anacoustic and vibration consultant to update noise and vibration modelling for theproject, determine appropriate mitigation measures to achieve the EnvironmentalPerformance Requirements and undertake further noise and vibrationmeasurements to assess ongoing compliance with the EnvironmentalPerformance Requirements.13.2EES ObjectiveThe EES Scoping Requirements set the following draft evaluation objective fornoise and vibration: Amenity – To minimise adverse noise or vibration effects on the amenity ofnearby residents and local communities, as far as practicable, especiallyduring the construction phase.In accordance with this objective, potential noise and vibration risks and impactsassociated with the construction and operation of Melbourne Metro have beenassessed. Using this information, Environmental Performance Requirementshave been recommended to manage adverse noise and vibration impactsassociated with the project.13.3Legislation and PolicyAs discussed in Chapter 4 EES Assessment Framework and Approach, noiseand vibration impacts associated with the construction and operation ofMelbourne Metro would be managed and monitored in accordance withCommonwealth and Victorian legislation, policies and guidelines (where theseare available). International and State guidelines have also been considered indetermining appropriate noise and vibration levels. The main legislation, policiesand guidelines for noise and vibration are set out in Table 13–1. Further detailsare provided in Section 3 of Technical Appendix I Noise and Vibration.Local laws relating to noise from construction and the duration of constructionactivities are not covered in Table 13–1 as section 258A of the Major TransportProjects Facilitation Act 2009 provides that local law permits are not required whena project is declared under the Act. Compliance with EPA Guidelines 1254 and 480would ensure the appropriate management of noise impacts during construction.13–4MMRA Environment Effects Statement

Table 13–1LegislationNoise and vibration legislation and policy relevant toMelbourne MetroPolicy/guidelineCommentState Environment ProtectionPolicy (Control of Noise fromCommerce, Industry and Trade)No. N-1 (SEPP N-1)SEPP N-1 provides a methodologyto determine the applicablemandatory Noise Limits for a NoiseSensitive Area that may be affectedby commercial, industrial or tradenoise. A Noise Sensitive Area isdefined in SEPP N-1 and consists ofdwellings, residential buildings andsimilar types of accommodation.SEPP N-1 does not apply toconstruction and demolition activitieson building sites; nor does it apply tonoise emanating from roads orrailway lines. However, it wouldapply to noise from fixed plant andequipment such as ventilationsystems.Environment ProtectionAuthority Noise ControlGuidelines Publication 1254(EPA 1254)Provides a framework for themanagement of construction noiseand has been used for determiningGuideline Noise LevelsVictorian Passenger RailInfrastructure Noise Policy(Victorian Government, 2013)Provides Investigation Thresholdsfor the redevelopment of existing railinfrastructureStateEnvironmentProtection Act1970Other relevant documentsMMRA EPA Publication 480,Environmental Guidelines forMajor Construction Sites, 1996Provides guidance for constructionnoise; however, EPA 1254 would bethe primary documentNSW Interim ConstructionNoise Guideline, Department ofEnvironment and ClimateChange, 2009Provides Guideline Targets formanagement of ground-borneconstruction noise in the absence ofVictorian or Commonwealth criteriaAustralian Standard AS24362010, Guide to noise andvibration control onconstruction, demolition andmaintenance sites. (AS 2436)Reference documentGerman Standard DIN 4150-3Structural Vibration Part 3:Effects of vibration onstructures (DIN 4150)Provides Guideline Targets forconstruction vibration with respect todamage to buildings in the absenceof Victorian or Commonwealthcriteria. Used for determiningGuideline TargetsAmerican Society of Heating,Refrigeration and Airconditioning Engineers(ASHRAE), Chapter 48, Soundand Vibration ControlProvides Guideline Targets formanagement of vibration withrespect to vibration-sensitiveequipment in the absence ofVictorian or Commonwealth criteriaEnvironment Effects Statement13–5

Legislation13.4Policy/guidelineCommentNSW Rail Infrastructure NoiseGuideline, May 2013Provides Guideline Targets formanagement of ground-borne noisefrom trains in the absence ofVictorian or Commonwealth criteria.Used for determining GuidelineTargetsAustralian Standard AS2187.22006 Explosives – Storage andUse Part 2: Use of explosivesProvides Guideline Targets formanagement of blasting activitiesAS/NZS 2107:2000Australian/New ZealandStandard AcousticsRecommended design soundlevels and reverberation timesfor building interiorsProvides Guideline Targets forinternal noise levelsBritish Standard BS64721:2008. Guide to Evaluation ofHuman Exposure to Vibration inBuildings. Part 1: Vibrationsources other than blastingProvides Guideline Targets forcontinuous, intermittent or impulsivevibration. Used for determiningGuideline TargetsNSW Assessing Vibration: atechnical guideline, Departmentof Environment andConservation, 2006Provides guidance on the values tobe used use in assessing humanresponses to vibration, based onBS6472Transit Noise and VibrationImpact Assessment, FederalTransit Administration (FTA),US Department ofTransportation, FTA-VA-901003-06, 2006Considered in developing a modelfor predicting vibration and groundborne noise associated withproposed mass transit projectsMethodology13.4.1Assessment ApproachStudy AreaNoise and vibration has been assessed in the vicinity of all Melbourne Metroprecincts. The assessment has also considered the effects of noise along theproposed construction vehicle routes and along the Sunshine – Dandenong Lineoutside the Melbourne Metro precinct boundaries.13–6MMRA Environment Effects Statement

Assessment MethodologyThe noise and vibration impact assessment has considered the potential effectsof Melbourne Metro on sensitive receivers (people, buildings and sensitiveequipment or processes) through the following pathways: Airborne noise: noise propagated through the air from source to receiver Ground-borne vibration (tactile vibration): vibration propagated through theground and into building structures that, if sufficiently high, can cause rattling Ground-borne noise: airborne noise within a building that is generated byvibration through the ground and into the structure and, if audible, isgenerally heard as a ‘rumble’.The impact assessment focused on construction airborne noise, vibration andground-borne noise, operational airborne noise (from trains and fixedinfrastructure such as fans) and operational vibration and ground-borne noisefrom trains.The assessment adopted the following approach: Undertake noise and vibration baseline measurements in the vicinity ofMelbourne Metro to determine existing conditions, including:– External ambient noise and internal noise measurements– External and internal vibration measurements– Underwater noise measurements (in the Yarra River) Determine appropriate criteria and Guideline Targets, taking into considerationexisting measured noise and vibration levels (see Section 13.4.2 below) Undertake modelling to predict if these criteria and Guideline Targets wouldbe achieved Recommend Environmental Performance Requirements (and potentialmitigation and management actions to satisfy these requirements) to manageadverse noise and vibration impacts associated with the project, includingmeasures to reduce noise and vibration levels where the predictions showthat levels could be higher than the Guideline Targets.The key aspects of the assessment methodology are summarised below. Furtherdetails of the methodology are provided in Section 4 of Technical Appendix INoise and Vibration.The noise and vibration impact assessment was independently peer reviewed.MMRA Environment Effects Statement13–7

Assessing vibration and ground-borne noiseThe following approach was used to predict construction vibration and ground-bornenoise levels and impacts: The type of occupancy (residential, commercial, utilities and other sensitiveuses) was identified for each affected location (receiver). A model was developed based on the US Federal Transit Administration’spredictive methodology for assessing noise and vibration impacts of proposedmass transit projects. Vibration sources levels for the TBM and roadheader were estimated using acombination of literature-based data and the specialists’ library of test data. The ground vibration attenuation characteristics for the project alignment werederived from a combination of literature-based data and interpretation ofgeotechnical measurements at boreholes on the alignment. The model was used to predict vibration and ground-borne noise levels forreceivers in the vicinity of the alignment. For the purpose of calculatingVibration Dose Values (VDV) – which is the accumulation of vibration energyreceived over either the day-time or night-time periods – day has been definedas 7:00am to 10:00pm and night has been defined as 10:00pm to 7:00am (asper BS6472-1:2008). The predicted vibration and ground-borne noise levels were then compared tothe proposed Guideline Target for each occupancy type. Where Guideline Targets would potentially be exceeded, further analysis wascarried out at one or more of the most affected receivers to quantify the durationof the exceedance for tunnelling and station construction activities.13.4.2Baseline and Background DataNoise and vibration baseline measurements were undertaken to help determinethe appropriate Guideline Targets to set for Melbourne Metro. Thesemeasurements enabled the predicted noise and vibration levels associated withthe construction and operation of Melbourne Metro to be considered within thecontext of the existing conditions in the vicinity of the project.Within each precinct, specific baseline/background data was obtained to establishexisting local noise and vibration levels. This involved taking measurements atrepresentative locations in the vicinity of anticipated noise and vibration generatingactivities for Melbourne Metro (for both construction and operation).The locations where baseline noise measurements were taken are shown inFigure 13-1. Vibration measurement locations are shown in Figure 13-2.Discussion about these measurements is included in Section 13.6 where theyare relevant to predicted impacts in the individual precincts. The detailed resultsof the baseline noise and vibration measurements are provided in Appendix F ofTechnical Appendix I Noise and Vibration.13–8MMRA Environment Effects Statement

Figure 13-1MMRA Baseline noise measurement locationsEnvironment Effects Statement13–9

Figure 13-213–10Baseline vibration measurement locationsMMRA Environment Effects Statement

13.5Noise and Vibration Levelsand CriteriaNoise and vibration impacts for Melbourne Metro have been assessed against thecriteria specified by Victorian, Australian and international guidelines and standards.Guideline Targets have been set for the project using these criteria and thebaseline measurements of existing conditions taken along the Melbourne Metroalignment. The Guideline Targets have been incorporated into the recommendedEnvironmental Performance Requirements.In some instances, the criteria are predicted to be achieved without mitigationmeasures being required. In other instances, appropriate mitigation measureswould need to be implemented to achieve the Environmental PerformanceRequirements and meet the Guideline Targets.The Environmental Performance Requirements also provide for ongoingmodelling and monitoring of noise and vibration levels to ensure thatmanagement actions and mitigation measures are appropriate during theproject’s construction.13.5.1Airborne NoiseAirborne Noise from ConstructionAirborne noise was modelled using the acoustic modelling software SoundPLAN,based on a number of indicative construction scenarios. The constructionairborne noise predictions assumed that all construction plant would be operatingconcurrently – a conservative approach that would be unlikely to occurin practice.Construction of Melbourne Metro would be managed in accordance with therequirements of EPA’s Noise Control Guidelines, EPA Publication 1254 (EPA1254). To meet the recommended Environmental Performance Requirements forthe project, the Melbourne Metro contractor would need to develop andimplement a plan to manage construction noise in accordance with EPA 1254(summarised in Table 13–2).Accordingly, predicted airborne noise levels from construction activities wereassessed with respect to EPA 1254 and giving consideration to existingmeasured noise levels.MMRA Environment Effects Statement13–11

Table 13–2EPA 1254 Guideline Noise LevelsGuideline Noise Levels, LAeq,15 minutesApplicable HoursUp to 18 monthsafter projectcommencementNormalWorkingHours7am to 6pm Monday toFridayNo specified Guideline Noise Levels – noisereduction measures applyWeekend/Eveningwork6pm to 10pm Mondayto FridayTimePeriodNight18 months or moreafter projectcommencement7am to 1pm SaturdayNoise level at anyresidential premisesnot to exceedbackground noise(LA90) by 5 dB(A) ormore.7am to 10 pm Sundayand Public HolidaysNoise level at anyresidential premisesnot to exceedbackground noise(LA90) by 10 dB(A) ormore.10pm to 7am Mondayto SundayNoise is to be inaudible within a habitable roomof any residential premises.1pm to 10pm SaturdayAs indicated in the table, no Guideline Noise Levels are specified in relation toconstruction during the day. However, noise emissions must be controlled duringthe day-time to ensure they are not unreasonable.Exceptions to the EPA 1254 Guideline Noise Levels include Unavoidable Works,which are works that cannot practicably meet the time schedule requirementsbecause the work involves continuous work (such as a concrete pour) or wouldotherwise pose an unacceptable risk to life or property, or risk a major traffichazard. Affected premises should be notified of such works, their duration andtimes of occurrence.Airborne Noise from TrainsOperational rail noise levels were evaluated against the Investigation Thresholdsset in the Victorian Passenger Rail Infrastructure Noise Policy (PRINP) for theredevelopment of existing rail infrastructure. The Environmental PerformanceRequirements for the project would require rail noise to be avoided, minimised ormitigated where the PRINP Investigation Thresholds are exceeded. Thesethresholds are summarised in Table 13–3.The day, night and maximum noise levels have been predicted for MelbourneMetro at sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the railway line as it emerges fromthe western and eastern tunnel portals and at the western turnback.13–12MMRA Environment Effects Statement

Table 13–3PRINP Investigation ThresholdsTimeType of receiverDay (6am –10pm)Night(10pm –6am)Residential dwellings and otherbuildings where people sleepincluding aged persons homes,hospitals, motels and caravanparks Noise sensitive communitybuildings, including schools,kindergartens, libraries Residential dwellings and otherbuildings where people sleepincluding aged persons homes,hospitals, motels and caravanparksInvestigation Thresholds65 dBLAeq and a change in3 dB(A) or moreor85 dBLAmax and a change in3 dB(A) or more60 dBLAeq and a change in3 dB(A) or moreor85 dBLAmax and a change in3 dB(A) or moreNotes:1. If an investigation shows that the thresholds are not exceeded then no further actionis considered under this policy.2. For this assessment, LAmax is defined as maximum A-weighted sound pressure leveland is the 95 percentile of the highest value of the A-weighed sound pressure levelreached within the day or night.3. For Melbourne Metro, the location of assessment is at 1m from the centre of thewindow of the most exposed external façade. All levels of buildings are included.The train airborne noise predictions for Melbourne Metro were undertaken inSoundPLAN for the following scenarios: Scenario 1: existing rail noise levels (for the eastern and westernportal precincts) Scenario 2: train noise levels in 2026 assuming Melbourne Metro does notproceed (base case) Scenario 3: train noise levels in 2036 assuming Melbourne Metro doesproceed (with Melbourne Metro).The year 2036 was selected for the assessment as it is 10 years after theanticipated opening of Melbourne Metro.The assessment results are summarised under Precinct 2 – Western Portal,Precinct 8 – Eastern Portal and Precinct 9 – Western Turnback. Full details areprovided in Appendix C of Technical Appendix I Noise and Vibration.Airborne Noise from Fixed InfrastructureTo meet the recommended Environmental Performance Requirements for theproject, noise from fixed infrastructure (such as extraction fans and ventilationsystems) during the operation of Melbourne Metro must comply with themandatory noise criteria at sensitive receptors determined under SEPP N-1.MMRA Environment Effects Statement13–13

13.5.2Vibration and Ground-borne NoiseThe vibration and ground-borne noise impacts of construction activities havebeen assessed in the context of: Tunnelling works – which would be undertaken by a TBM in all locationsexcept between CBD North and CBD South stations, where a roadheaderwould undertake these works. Roadheaders would also be used to excavatethe station caverns at CBD North and CBD South General construction works (also referred to in Technical Appendix I Noiseand Vibration as Additional Construction Works) – comprising all constructionwork other than tunnelling and roadheader excavation, such as theconstruction of stations and portals that would be undertaken by a variety ofequipment.Vibration from ConstructionThere are no published guidelines or standards for evaluating the effects ofvibration from tunnelling and construction activities in Victoria. The GuidelineTargets set in the recommended Environmental Performance Requirements forthe project have been based on: A German standard (DIN 4150-3) for vibration impacts on buildingsand utilities A Technical Guideline published by the NSW Department of Environmentand Conservation in 2006 for assessing the effects of vibration on humancomfort (based on British Standard BS6472-1:1992 which is nowsuperseded) Guidance for vibration-sensitive equipment published by the AmericanSociety of Heating, Refrigeration and Air-conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE)in 2011. The ASHRAE guideline has been applied to assessing the impactson vibration-sensitive equipment in the Parkville and CBD North stationprecincts (except where the measured ambient vibration levels are higherthan the ASHRAE levels).The Guideline Targets adopted for the vibration assessment are precautionary.Higher levels of vibration than the targets does not necessarily mean that thevibration effects would be unacceptable; rather, the extent of exceedance abovethe target would inform the management or mitigation responses that may needto be deployed to mitigate the effects of Melbourne Metro’s construction oroperation on residents and businesses.People perceive vibration at levels well below where structural damage occurs tobuildings. The degrees of human perception of vibration are summarised in theGerman Standard DIN 4150 (Part 2– 1975) and presented in Table 13–4.13–14MMRA Environment Effects Statement

Table 13–4Human perception of continuous vibration, based on DIN 4150.2Approximate vibration levelDegree of perception0.10 mm/sNot felt0.15 mm/sThreshold of perception0.35 mm/sBarely noticeable1.0 mm/sNoticeable2.2 mm/sEasily noticeable6 mm/sStrongly noticeable14 mm/sVery strongly noticeableGuideline Targets for vibration impacts on human comfort, structures andvibration-sensitive equipment are summarised in Tables 13-5 to 13-8.The levels outlined in Table 13–5 are vibration dosage values that are a calculationof the accumulation of vibration energy received over the day-time and night-timeperiods – day is defined as 7:00am to 10:00pm and night is defined as 10:00pm to7:00am (as per BS6472-1:2008). Below the table are notes that indicate theprobability of complaints that could be received with different vibration levels. Theprobability of complaints being received has been used as the basis for assessingthe predicted vibration impacts from the proposed construction methodology forMelbourne Metro.For unoccupied buildings or infrastructure (where personal amenity is not aconcern), the criteria have been based on protecting against cosmetic damage(such as plaster cracking and paint flaking) or on no loss of integrity for belowground assets such as pipelines and cables.The Guideline Targets have formed the basis for the vibration impactassessment conducted for this EES. Under the recommended EnvironmentalPerformance Requirements, management and mitigation measures would beimplemented in instances where the recorded vibration levels are higher thanthese Guideline Targets. Predicted levels of vibration based on detailed designand the associated construction program would be used to inform managementmeasures and consultation prior to construction of main works.MMRA Environment Effects Statement13–15

Table 13–5Guideline Targets for human comfort: Vibration Dose Values (VDV)for construction vibration with respect to adverse commentVibration Dose Values (m/s1.75)Day7:00 am to 10:00 pmNight10:00 pm to 7:00 alueResidence

vibration propagated through the ground and into the structure). The extent of the project’s noise and vibration impacts would depend upon a . railway lines. However, it would apply to noise from fixed plant and equipm

Related Documents:

United States Population by Metropolitan Size/Status, 1980–2010 2010 Population Shares by Metro Size (%) Chart 1 Chart 2 large metro ( 500k) small metro ( 500k) non-metro large metro 65.6% small metro 18.0% non-metro 16.4% Growth Rates by Metro Size 12% 12.5 14.3 10% 16% 14% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 1980–1990 1990–2000 2000–2010 10.9 8.8 13.1 10 .

Noise Figure Overview of Noise Measurement Methods 4 White Paper Noise Measurements The noise contribution from circuit elements is usually defined in terms of noise figure, noise factor or noise temperature. These are terms that quantify the amount of noise that a circuit element adds to a signal.

Transit noise and vibration analysis, noise and vibration impact criteria, noise and vibration mitigation measures, environmental impact assessment, National Environmental Policy Act compliance. 15. NUMBER OF PAGES 274 16. PRICE CODE 17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF REPORT Unclassified 18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE Unclassified 19.

november 2011 v1 olume 1 section 3 Part 7 hD 213/11 2. noise anD vibration – uK hiGhwaYs Definition of noise and vibration 2.1 Traffic noise is a general term used to define the noise from traffic using the road network. A traffic stream is made up of a variety of vehicle types which have their own individual noise sources. Close to a

noise and tire noise. The contribution rate of tire noise is high when the vehicle is running at a constant speed of 50 km/h, reaching 86-100%, indicating tire noise is the main noise source [1]. Therefore, reducing tire noise is important for reducing the overall noise of the vehicle and controlling noise pollution [2].

The Noise Element of a General Plan is a tool for including noise control in the planning process in order to maintain compatible land use with environmental noise levels. This Noise Element identifies noise sensitive land uses and noise sources, and defines areas of noise impact for the purpose of

7 LNA Metrics: Noise Figure Noise factor is defined by the ratio of output SNR and input SNR. Noise figure is the dB form of noise factor. Noise figure shows the degradation of signal's SNR due to the circuits that the signal passes. Noise factor of cascaded system: LNA's noise factor directly appears in the total noise factor of the system.

Figure 1: Power spectral density of white noise overlaid by flicker noise. Figure 2: Flicker noise generated from white noise. 1.1 The nature of flicker noise Looking at processes generating flicker noise in the time domain instead of the frequency domain gives us much more insight into the nature of flicker noise.