Minutes Of The Federal Open Market Committee April 29–30, 2014

3y ago
13 Views
2 Downloads
254.43 KB
10 Pages
Last View : 22d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Amalia Wilborn
Transcription

Page 1Minutes of the Federal Open Market CommitteeApril 29–30, 2014A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee washeld in the offices of the Board of Governors of theFederal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., onTuesday, April 29, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. and continuedon Wednesday, April 30, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.PRESENT:Janet L. Yellen, ChairWilliam C. Dudley, Vice ChairmanRichard W. FisherNarayana KocherlakotaSandra PianaltoCharles I. PlosserJerome H. PowellJeremy C. SteinDaniel K. TarulloCharles L. Evans, Jeffrey M. Lacker, Dennis P.Lockhart, and John C. Williams, AlternateMembers of the Federal Open Market CommitteeJames Bullard, Esther L. George, and Eric Rosengren,Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of St.Louis, Kansas City, and Boston, respectivelyWilliam B. English, Secretary and EconomistMatthew M. Luecke, Deputy SecretaryMichelle A. Smith, Assistant SecretaryScott G. Alvarez, General CounselSteven B. Kamin, EconomistDavid W. Wilcox, EconomistJames A. Clouse, Thomas A. Connors,1 Evan F.Koenig, Thomas Laubach, Michael P. Leahy,Loretta J. Mester, Samuel Schulhofer-Wohl, MarkE. Schweitzer, and William Wascher, AssociateEconomistsSimon Potter, Manager, System Open Market AccountNellie Liang, Director, Office of Financial StabilityPolicy and Research, Board of GovernorsMatthew J. Eichner, Deputy Director, Division ofResearch and Statistics, Board of Governors;Stephen A. Meyer and William Nelson, DeputyDirectors, Division of Monetary Affairs, Board ofGovernorsJon W. Faust, Special Adviser to the Board, Office ofBoard Members, Board of GovernorsTrevor A. Reeve, Special Adviser to the Chair, Officeof Board Members, Board of GovernorsLinda Robertson,3 Assistant to the Board, Office ofBoard Members, Board of GovernorsEllen E. Meade and Joyce K. Zickler, Senior Advisers,Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of GovernorsDavid Bowman4 and Beth Anne Wilson, AssociateDirectors, Division of International Finance, Boardof Governors; Daniel M. Covitz, David E. Lebow,and Michael G. Palumbo, Associate Directors,Division of Research and Statistics, Board ofGovernors; Fabio M. Natalucci2 and Gretchen C.Weinbach,2 Associate Directors, Division ofMonetary Affairs, Board of GovernorsMarnie Gillis DeBoer2 and Jane E. Ihrig,2 DeputyAssociate Directors, Division of Monetary Affairs,Board of GovernorsBrian J. Gross,1 Special Assistant to the Board, Officeof Board Members, Board of GovernorsStacey Tevlin, Assistant Director, Division of Researchand Statistics, Board of GovernorsLorie K. Logan, Deputy Manager, System OpenMarket AccountRobert J. Tetlow, Adviser, Division of MonetaryAffairs, Board of GovernorsRobert deV. Frierson,2 Secretary of the Board, Officeof the Secretary, Board of Governors1Michael S. Gibson, Director, Division of BankingSupervision and Regulation, Board of GovernorsAttended Wednesday’s session only.Attended the discussion of monetary policy normalization.3 Attended Tuesday’s session only.4 Attended Tuesday’s session following the discussion ofmonetary policy normalization.2

Page 2Federal Open Market CommitteeDana L. Burnett, Section Chief, Division of MonetaryAffairs, Board of GovernorsPatrick McCabe,2 Senior Economist, Division ofResearch and Statistics, Board of GovernorsPenelope A. Beattie,2 Assistant to the Secretary, Officeof the Secretary, Board of GovernorsRandall A. Williams, Records Project Manager,Division of Monetary Affairs, Board of GovernorsJames M. Lyon, First Vice President, Federal ReserveBank of MinneapolisDavid Altig, James J. McAndrews, and Alberto G.Musalem, Executive Vice Presidents, FederalReserve Banks of Atlanta, New York, and NewYork, respectivelyJoshua L. Frost and Spencer Krane, Senior VicePresidents, Federal Reserve Banks of New Yorkand Chicago, respectivelyGeorge A. Kahn, Antoine Martin, Joe Peek, Keith Sill,Daniel L. Thornton, and Douglas Tillett, VicePresidents, Federal Reserve Banks of Kansas City,New York, Boston, Philadelphia, St. Louis, andChicago, respectivelyAndreas L. Hornstein, Senior Advisor, Federal ReserveBank of RichmondJohn Fernald, Senior Research Adviser, FederalReserve Bank of San FranciscoSean Savage, Senior Associate, Federal Reserve Bank ofNew York2 Attended the discussion of monetary policy normalization.Monetary Policy NormalizationIn a joint session of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, meeting participants discussed issuesassociated with the eventual normalization of thestance and conduct of monetary policy. The Committee’s discussion of this topic was undertaken as part ofprudent planning and did not imply that normalizationwould necessarily begin sometime soon. A staffpresentation outlined several approaches to raisingshort-term interest rates when it becomes appropriateto do so, and to controlling the level of short-term interest rates once they are above the effective lowerbound, during a period when the Federal Reserve willhave a very large balance sheet. The approaches differed in terms of the combination of policy tools thatmight be used to accomplish those objectives. In addition to the rate of interest paid on excess reserve balances, the tools considered included fixed-rate overnight reverse repurchase (ON RRP) operations, termreverse repurchase agreements, and the Term DepositFacility (TDF). The staff presentation discussed thepotential implications of each approach for financialintermediation and financial markets, including the federal funds market, and the possible implications forfinancial stability. In addition, the staff outlined options for additional operational testing of the policytools.Following the staff presentation, meeting participantsdiscussed a wide range of topics related to policy normalization. Participants generally agreed that startingto consider the options for normalization at this meeting was prudent, as it would help the Committee tomake decisions about approaches to policy normalization and to communicate its plans to the public wellbefore the first steps in normalizing policy become appropriate. Early communication, in turn, would enhance the clarity and credibility of monetary policy andhelp promote the achievement of the Committee’sstatutory objectives. It was emphasized that the toolsavailable to the Committee will allow it to reduce policyaccommodation when doing so becomes appropriate.Participants considered how various combinations oftools could have different implications for the degreeof control over short-term interest rates, for the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet and remittances to theTreasury, for the functioning of the federal funds market, and for financial stability in both normal times andin periods of stress. Because the Federal Reserve hasnot previously tightened the stance of policy whileholding a large balance sheet, most participants judgedthat the Committee should consider a range of optionsand be prepared to adjust the mix of its policy tools aswarranted. Participants generally favored the furthertesting of various tools, including the TDF, to betterassess their operational readiness and effectiveness. Nodecisions regarding policy normalization were taken;participants requested additional analysis from the staffand agreed that it would be helpful to continue to review these issues at upcoming meetings. The Boardmeeting concluded at the end of the discussion.

Minutes of the Meeting of April 29–30, 2014Page 3Developments in Financial Markets and the Federal Reserve’s Balance SheetThe manager of the System Open Market Account(SOMA) reported on developments in domestic andforeign financial markets as well as the System openmarket operations during the period since theCommittee met on March 18–19, 2014. By unanimousvote, the Committee ratified the Open Market Desk’sdomestic transactions over the intermeeting period.There were no intervention operations in foreigncurrencies for the System’s account over theintermeeting period.By unanimous vote, the Committee agreed to renewthe reciprocal currency arrangements with the Bank ofCanada and the Bank of Mexico; these arrangementsare associated with the Federal Reserve’s participationin the North American Framework Agreement of1994. In addition, by unanimous vote, the Committeeagreed to renew the dollar and foreign currency liquidity swap arrangements with the Bank of Canada, theBank of England, the Bank of Japan, the EuropeanCentral Bank, and the Swiss National Bank. The votesto renew the Federal Reserve’s participation in thesearrangements were taken at this meeting because provisions in the arrangements specify that the Federal Reserve provide six months’ prior notice of an intentionto terminate its participation.Staff Review of the Economic SituationThe information reviewed for the April 29–30 meetingindicated that growth in economic activity paused inthe first quarter as a whole, but that activity stepped uplate in the quarter; this pattern reflected, in part, thetemporary effects of the unusually cold and snowyweather earlier in the quarter and the unwinding ofthose effects later in the quarter. In March, payrollemployment increased further, although the unemployment rate held steady and was still elevated. Consumer price inflation continued to run below theCommittee’s longer-run objective, but measures oflonger-run inflation expectations remained stable.The unemployment rate stayed at 6.7 percent in March,but both the labor force participation rate and the employment-to-population ratio increased slightly. Therate of long-duration unemployment declined somewhat, but the share of workers employed part time foreconomic reasons moved up; both of these measureswere still well above their pre-recession levels. Initialclaims for unemployment insurance remained low overthe intermeeting period. Although the rate of jobopenings moved up in February, the hiring rate was flatand continued to be subdued.Following a rebound in February that was partlyweather related, manufacturing production rose furtherin March and the rate of manufacturing capacity utilization increased. The production of motor vehicles andparts declined in March, but factory output outside ofthe motor vehicle sector expanded. Automakers’schedules indicated that the pace of motor vehicle assemblies in the coming months would be similar to thelevel in March. However, broad indicators of manufacturing production, such as the new orders indexes fromthe national and regional manufacturing surveys, wereat levels consistent with moderate increases in factoryoutput in the near term.Real personal consumption expenditures (PCE) expanded slightly less rapidly in the first quarter than inthe fourth quarter. After moving roughly sideways, onnet, in January and February, the component of nominal retail sales used by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) to construct its monthly estimate of PCErose briskly in March, in part because the weather returned to more seasonal norms. Recent informationon several important factors that influence householdspending was positive. Real disposable income continued to increase in the first quarter, further gains inhouse prices likely bolstered household net worth, andconsumer sentiment in the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan Surveys of Consumersimproved, on balance, in March and April.The pace of activity in the housing sector remainedsoft, as real expenditures for residential investment decreased again in the first quarter. Starts of new singlefamily homes increased in March. However, permitsfor single-family homes—which are typically less sensitive to fluctuations in the weather and a better indicatorof the underlying pace of construction—remained below their fourth-quarter level and had not shown a sustained improvement since last spring, when mortgagerates began to rise. Sales of both new and existinghomes decreased in March of this year, but pendinghome sales rose.Real private expenditures on business equipment andintellectual property products declined in the first quarter. However, nominal shipments of nondefense capital goods excluding aircraft rose in February and inMarch, and new orders were somewhat above the levelof shipments, pointing to modest gains in shipments inthe near term. Other forward-looking indicators, suchas surveys of business conditions and capital spending

Page 4Federal Open Market Committeeplans, were also consistent with increased outlays forbusiness equipment in the coming months. Realspending for nonresidential construction was about flatin the first quarter after declining in the fourth quarter,while real inventory investment moved lower. Businessinventories in most industries appeared to be broadlyaligned with sales in recent months.Real federal government purchases rose slightly in thefirst quarter, as the increase from the reversal of thegovernment shutdown in the fourth quarter was mostlyoffset by the ongoing downtrend in purchases. Realstate and local government purchases decreased somewhat in the first quarter, as state and local constructionexpenditures declined.The U.S. international trade deficit widened in Februaryas exports fell and imports rose. The export declineswere concentrated in aircraft and petroleum products,while exports of consumer goods rose. Rising importsof services and automotive products offset declines inimports of oil and capital goods. In the advance releaseof the national income and product accounts, the BEAestimated that net exports subtracted substantially fromreal gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the firstquarter.U.S. consumer prices, as measured by the PCE priceindex, rose at a slow rate in the first quarter, thoughsomewhat faster than the pace posted in the fourthquarter, and were about 1 percent higher than a yearearlier. After falling in the fourth quarter, consumerenergy prices increased markedly in the first quarter asnatural gas prices moved higher on a sharp decline ininventories during the unusually cold winter months.The PCE price index for items excluding food and energy rose at the same rate in the first quarter as in theprevious one and was around 1¼ percent higher thanfour quarters earlier. Both near- and longer-term inflation expectations from the Michigan survey were unchanged in March and April. Over the 12 months ending in March, both the employment cost index forprivate-sector workers and average hourly earnings forall employees increased only a little more than consumer price inflation.Indicators of foreign economic activity suggested continued expansion in the first quarter but at a ratesomewhat below that in the fourth quarter. The deceleration was concentrated in emerging market economies (EMEs). Real GDP growth slowed markedly inChina, largely reflecting lower investment growth andexports. Weaker exports also restrained economic activity in other emerging Asian economies. In Mexico,indicators of activity suggested some improvementfrom a lackluster fourth quarter. By contrast, economicgrowth remained near its solid fourth-quarter pace inthe advanced foreign economies (AFEs). In the euroarea, the United Kingdom, and Canada, average industrial production in the first two months of the year wasup moderately from the fourth quarter; in Japan, industrial production rose robustly, and consumer demandwas boosted by anticipation of the April increase in theconsumption tax. Inflation developments were mixed.Inflation rebounded in Canada but remained very lowin the euro area. In China and India, inflation fell inthe first quarter, largely because of lower food prices.Monetary policy remained highly accommodative during the intermeeting period in the AFEs and also inmany EMEs, although monetary policy in Brazil wastightened to contain inflation pressures.Staff Review of the Financial SituationDespite some volatility in certain asset prices, financialconditions did not change appreciably, on net, over theintermeeting period. Asset prices moved in responseto economic data releases that were, on balance, a littlestronger than expected and to Federal Reserve communications. The anticipated path of the federal fundsrate moved up somewhat, as did intermediate-datedTreasury yields, while corporate bond spreads narrowed and the S&P 500 increased slightly. The foreignexchange value of the dollar was little changed.Federal Reserve communications garnered significantattention from market participants over the period butappeared to have only a modest net effect on their expectations for monetary policy. The communicationsfollowing the conclusion of the March FOMC meetingwere interpreted as somewhat less accommodative thanexpected. However, subsequent communications—including the release of the minutes of the MarchFOMC meeting—appeared to mostly reverse the earlier change in expectations.Yields on short- and medium-term nominal Treasurysecurities rose, on balance, over the intermeeting period. In contrast, yields at the long end of the curve declined, continuing a downward trend evident overmuch of this year. Market participants cited a numberof factors as contributing to the drop in long-termyields so far this year, including portfolio reallocationby large institutional investors, the trading strategiespursued by some investors, and safe-haven flows.Some market participants reportedly also revised downtheir estimate of the average real federal funds rate overthe longer term, reflecting in part changes in their as-

Minutes of the Meeting of April 29–30, 2014Page 5sessments of long-run economic conditions. Measuresof longer-horizon inflation compensation based onTreasury Inflation-Protected Securities were littlechanged.Conditions in short-term funding markets remainedfairly stable over the intermeeting period. Take-up inthe Federal Reserve’s fixed-rate ON RRP exercise continued to be sensitive to the spread between marketrates and the rate offered in the exercise, with highertake-up occurring on days when the market rate onrepurchase agreements was close to or below the ONRRP rate. As has been the case since the ON RRPexercise began, money market funds increased theirusage at quarter-end; take-up reached a record level ofabout 240 billion at the end of March. Part of theincrease in ON RRP usage at the end of March relativeto the end of December likely reflected higher counterparty allotment limits, which were raised from 3 billion to 7 billion during the first quarter. The allotmentlimit was subsequently increased to 10 billion percounterparty in early April. The seasonal paydown ofshort-term Treasury debt following the April tax datewas accompanied by a notable pickup in participationat ON RRP operations, but Treasury repo rates generally remained very close to the ON RRP rate of 5 basispoints.The S&P 500 increased a bit, on net, over the intermeeting period, but broader stock market indexesedged down. The prices of social media and biotechnology stocks, which had risen substantially faster thanthe broader market over the previous year, fell sharplyover the intermeeting period, leaving the gains on theseshares about in line with those on broader indexes overthe past 12 months. Some initial public offerings werereportedly put on hold as prices of small-capitalizationstocks declined. By contrast, stocks that generally havemore stable dividends, such as those of utility and telecommunications companies, advanced. First-quarterearnings reports for large banking organizations weremixed, and the stock prices of such firms generally underperformed broad equity indexes.Credit flows to nonfinancial corporations remainedrobust, on balance, notwithstanding subdued bond issuance in April that was attributed to typical constraintson issuance during the period when many firms arereporting their earnings. The growth in commercialand industrial loans on banks’ balance sheets remainedrobust, consistent with the increase in loan demand bylarge and middle-market firms reported in the AprilSenior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Len

Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee April 29–30, 2014 A meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee was held in the offices of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, April 29, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. and continued on Wednesday, April 30, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. PRESENT: Janet L. Yellen, Chair

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Warm-Up Task 3 minutes 5 minutes Game Procedures Review 5 minutes 5 minutes Research and Argument Building 5 minutes 15 minutes Round 1 (eight contenders) 15 minutes 25 minutes Round 2 (four contenders) 10 minutes 20 minutes Round 3 (two contenders) 7 minutes 15 minutes Reflection and Assessment 5 minutes 5 minutes Total 50 minutes 90 minutes

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

COUNTY Archery Season Firearms Season Muzzleloader Season Lands Open Sept. 13 Sept.20 Sept. 27 Oct. 4 Oct. 11 Oct. 18 Oct. 25 Nov. 1 Nov. 8 Nov. 15 Nov. 22 Jan. 3 Jan. 10 Jan. 17 Jan. 24 Nov. 15 (jJr. Hunt) Nov. 29 Dec. 6 Jan. 10 Dec. 20 Dec. 27 ALLEGANY Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open Open .