Federal Aviation COMPOSITE MATERIAL FIRE FIGHTING

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
549.80 KB
21 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ronan Orellana
Transcription

Federal AviationAdministrationCOMPOSITE MATERIALFIRE FIGHTINGPresented to: International Aircraft Materials Fire Test WorkingGroup, Koeln, GermanyPresented by: Robert Ian OchsPrepared By: John C. HodeDate: Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Expanding Composites Use Increased use of composites in commercialaviation has been well established– 12% in the B-777 (First flight 1994)– 25% in the A380 (Maiden flight 2005)– 50% in both B-787 & A350 (Scheduled) A380, B-787 & A350 are the first to usecomposites in pressurized fuselage skinAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration2

Airport Fire Fighting Agent Aqueous-film-forming-foam (AFFF) is commonlyused at U.S. airports. (MIL SPEC required by FAA) Agent quantities are the amount of water needed tomake foam solution In the United States, the required quantities ofagent are provided by Airport Index in CFR 139.317THE BIG QUESTION:Do composite skinned aircraft require more agent tocontrol external fire and facilitate evacuation?Airport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration3

Extinguishing Burning CompositeOBJECTIVE Determine the best method and agents to quickly and efficientlyextinguish a variety of aircraft compositesAPPROACH Evaluate existing agents (Class A foam, AFFF, Heat absorbinggels) and application techniques (such as UHP) to identify themost effective method to extinguish fires involving large amountsof composites Use standardized composite samples of carbon/epoxy and GLARE Use standard sized fire Orient the composites in both horizontal and vertical configurations Evaluate the effects of wicking fuel into delaminated compositelayersAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration4

FedEx DC10-10F, Memphis,Tennessee, USA18 December 2003Aluminum skinned cargo flightTraditionally, the initialfocus is on extinguishingthe external fuel fire tostop fuselage penetration.Airport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration5

Airport FirefightingWhat we know ALUMINUMCARBON/EPOXYGLARENorm for ARFFUnfamiliar to ARFFUnfamiliar to ARFFMelts at 660 C (1220 F)Resin ignitesat 400 C (752 F)Outer AL melts, glasslayers charBurn-through in 60secondsResists burn-through morethan 5 minutesResists burn-through over15 minutesReadily dissipates heatMay hold heatMay hold heatCurrent AircraftB787 & A3502 Sections of A380 skinAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration6

Airport Firefighting Equipment Thermal Imaging Cameras (TIC)– Provide color or black & white images Multi Gas Detectors– Detects 4 gasses, Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) of combustible gasOxygen (O2)Carbon Monoxide (CO)Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S)Both help to assess fire conditionsAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration7

Carbon/Epoxy MishapsFire ExtinguishmentNavy F/A-18, San Diego,California, USA8 December 2008Fixing Composite Fibers for RecoveryPhoto credit: Don Bartletti/Los Angeles Times,retrieved from LATimes.comPhoto credit: Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times,retrieved from LATimes.comAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration8

Carbon/Epoxy MishapsSix hours to extinguish fireAir Force B-2, Guam, USA8 December 200883,000 gallons of water and 2,500 gallonsof AFFF to achieve total extinguishmentAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration9

Test Fire Requirements Key Features– Reproducible– Cost Effective– Realistic Material– Must achieve self-sustained combustion orsmoldering– Test of agents and application technologiesAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration10

Cone CalorimiterReference to Brown, J.E. et.al., NBSIR 88-3733, “Cone CalorimeterEvaluation of the Flammability of Composite Materials”, March 1988“Data from this instrument can be used in research to predict thefull-scale fire behavior of certain furnishings and wall liningmaterials. [6]” p. 3“Babrauskas and Parker [7] deduced that the spectraldistribution of this source approximates the irradiance incompartment fires, where radiation is the primary process forenergy transfer.” p. 4Airport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration11

FAA Burn-through Test Method NextGen Burner– Simulates open pooled fuel fire– Flame temperature approximately 1900 deg F (16Btu/ft2 sec) This test method is currently the only onethat presents a repeatable simulation of anexternal fuel pool fire The burner can be used without anymodification for these testsAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration12

Proposed test set-up Sample oriented to the burner in the same manner asinsulation blanket samples.Thermocouples fixed to each of the four edges and front andback faces of the sample.Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) video cameras placed infront and rear of sample to correlate with TC data and giveunderstanding of what TICs might see.Color video cameras positioned adjacent to FLIR cameras tocapture the same view. Images will be compared to FLIR todetermine any visual cues of temperature reduction.If feasible, air samples will be collected to assess products ofcombustion. Data may be helpful to determine if off-gassingfrom combustion can be a measure of extinguishment.Airport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration13

Proposed test set-upColor CameraInstrumented hood tocollect air samplesColor CameraFLIR CameraTC’s on front and back facesFLIR CameraTC’s, all 4 edgesColorCamera(side view)Airport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration14

Testing in two stages First stage: Determine if self-sustainedcombustion or smoldering will occur after 5minute pre-burn. If no result with 5 minutepre-burn, increases of 5 minute incrementswill be applied to assess what duration will. Second stage: If first condition is met,determine how much fire agent is needed tocool the material sufficiently to extinguishand prevent re-ignition.Airport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration15

Agent Application Propose to use nozzle and delivery definedin MIL-SPEC, MIL-F-24385F– 2 gallons/minute– Made by National Foam Systems (or equal)– Modified for test Shortened length from 2 1/2 inches to 1 1/4 inches “wing-tip” spreader added to outlet, 1/8 inch wide circularorifice, 1 7/8 inches long– Nozzle pressure maintained at 100 lb/in2– Solution temperature 23 deg C /- 5 deg CNozzle could be mounted or hand-held forapplicationAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration16

MIL-SPEC NozzleAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration17

For your consideration Use of existing test methods allows greaterconfidence in results FAA oil burner is the best representation ofan external, impinging pooled fuel fire MIL-SPEC nozzle provides a repeatableapplication method for small scaleAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration18

Relevant Literature Sorathia, U et.al., July/August 1997, Review of Fire Test Methods and Criteria forComposites– FAA Advisory Circular 20-107A, Composite Aircraft Structure– Documents a 94 second ignition time for carbon/epoxy resinNavy NAVAIR 00-80R-14, 15 October 2003, NATOPS U.S. Navy Aircraft Firefighting AndRescue Manual, Section 2.7.1 Composite Materials– Documents resin ignition temperature for carbon/epoxy composite used in aircraftLyon, R.E., DOT/FAA/AR-TN95/22, Fire Response of Geopolymer Structural Composites– GLARE burn-through resistance of over 15 minutes during cargo liner testsQuintiere, J.G. et.al., DOT/FAA/AR-07/57, Flammability Properties of Aircraft CarbonFiber Structural Composite– Documents aluminum burn-through timesHooijmeijer, P.A., Fiber Metal Laminates; An Introduction, Kluwer academic Publishers,Dordrecht, 2001, Chapter 26, “Burn-through and lightning strike”.– Documents burn-through times for aluminumMarker, T., DOT/FAA/AR-98/52, Full-Scale Test Evaluation of Aircraft Fuel FireBurnthrough Resistance Improvements– Requires fire penetration resistance to be at least 5 minutesWebster, H., DOT/FAA/CT-90-10, Fuselage Burnthrough From Large Exterior Fuel Fires– Discussion of composites fire test methodsDocuments ignition temperature for carbon/epoxyMiller, A., 2007, Engineering the best: Boomers, a bridge and the Boeing 787 atUniversity of Washington, College of Engineering–Discussed burn-through resistance of over 20 minutes during tests on 787 carbon/epoxyAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration19

Relevant Literature, continued Air Force Technical Order 00-105E-9, 31 December 2008, Revision 14, AerospaceEmergency Rescue and Mishap Response Information (Emergency Services), Chapter 3Composite Material Hazards– Brown, J.E. et.al., March 1988, US Navy, NBSIR 88-3733, Cone Calorimeter Evaluation ofthe Flammability of Composite Materials– Discusses oil burner test method and equipmentCFR 14 Part 25.856, Thermal/Acoustic insulation materials, Appendix F, Part VII, TestMethod To Determine the Burnthrough Resistance of Thermal/Acoustic InsulationMaterials– Hand line testFAA Fuselage Burn-through Test Method– Small-scale nozzle design and discharge parametersNFPA 412 2009 ed. Standard for Evaluating Aircraft Rescue and Fire-Fighting FoamEquipment– Cone calorimeter is an interior materials testMIL-F-24385F 7 January 1992, Military Specification Fire Extinguishing Agent, AFFF– Documents resin ignition temperature for carbon/epoxy composite used in aircraftDescribes in detail the oil burner test method and equipmentFAA DOT/FAA/AR-00/12, Aircraft Materials Fire Test Handbook–Describes FAA required fire test methodsAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration20

Participation welcomeAirport Safety Technology ResearchMarch 10, 2009Federal AviationAdministration21

Norm for ARFF Unfamiliar to ARFF Unfamiliar to ARFF Melts at 660 C (1220 F) Resin ignites at 400 C (752 F) Outer AL melts, glass layers char Burn-through in 60 seconds Resists burn-through more than 5 minutes Resists burn-through over 15 minutes Readily dissipates heat May hold heat May hol

Related Documents:

Federal Aviation Administration CE F, General Composite Structure Guidance Background –With the evolving/advancing composite technology and expanding composite applications, AC 20-107 “Composite Aircraft Structure” will require revision Deliverables –Revision to AC 20-107, “Composite Aircraft Structure,” to

Types of composite: A) Based on curing mechanism: 1- Chemically activated composite 2- Light activated composite B) Based on size of filler particles: 1 - Conventional composite 2- Small particles composite 3-Micro filled composite 4- Hybrid composite 1- Chemically activated, composite resins: This is two - paste system:

FIRE TOPPER Fire Bowl User Manual Home » FIRE TOPPER » FIRE TOPPER Fire Bowl User Manual Contents [ hide 1 FIRE TOPPER Fire Bowl 2 Setting Up Your Fire Topper Fire Bowl 2.1 Set-Up 3 Placement and Location 3.1 Liquid Propane Tank 4 Using your Fire Topper Fire Bowl - For your safety, read before lighting. 5 Cleaning, Maintenance, Storage 6 .

social or cultural context (livelihoods, festivals, traditional, conflict) and perhaps regulatory framework (permit fires, illegal fires). The terms include fires, wildfires, wildland fire, forest fire, grass fire, scrub fire, brush fire, bush fire, veldt fire, rural fire, vegetation fire and so on (IUFRO 2018). The European Forest Fire

material is added, the tensile strength of rubber composite is increased by 161%. When 1g of material is added, the tensile strength of rubber composite is increased by 73%. When 0.5g of material is added, rubber composite the tensile strength of the material has increased by 43%. 1. Introduction 1.1. Background

Advanced Composite MaterialsAdvanced Composite Materials What is a ‘Composite Material’? “A composite material is a material system consisting of two (or more))pyg materials that are distinct at a physical scale greater than about 1 x 10-6m (1 m), and which are bonded together at the atomic and/or molecular levels.”

Fire Exit Legend Basement N Blood Fitness & Dance Center Fire Safety Plans 7.18.13 Annunciator Panel Sprinkler Room AP SR FIRE FIRE SR ELEV. Evacuation Route Stair Evacuation Route Fire Extinguisher Fire Alarm FIRE Pull Station Emergency Fire Exit Legend Level 1 N Blood Fitness & Dance Center Fire Safety Pl

Squirrel threw the fire to Chipmunk. The Fire Beings ran after the fire. One Fire Being grabbed Chipmunk’s back. The Fire Being’s hot hand put three stripes on Chipmunk’s back. Chipmunk threw the fire to Frog. The Fire Beings ran after the fire. One Fire Being grabbed Frog’s tail. Frog jumped, and