Six Minute Walk Test To Assess Functional Capacity In .

2y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
773.48 KB
6 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Cannon Runnels
Transcription

Online Submissions: wjg.wjgnet.comwww.wjgnet.comwjg@wjgnet.comWorld J Gastroenterol 2007 August 7; 13(29): 3996-4001World Journal of Gastroenterology ISSN 1007-9327 2007 WJG. All rights reserved.RAPID COMMUNICATIONSix Minute Walk Test to assess functional capacity in chronicliver disease patientsHatem F Alameri, Faisal M Sanai, Manal Al Dukhayil, Nahla A Azzam, Khalid A Al-Swat, Ahmad S Hersi,Ayman A AbdoHatem F Alameri, Unit of Pulmonary Medicine, Department ofMedicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaManal Al Dukhayil, Nahla A Azzam, Khalid A Al-Swat, AhmadS Hersi, Ayman A Abdo, Unit of Gastroenterology, Departmentof Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaFaisal M Sanai, Hepatology Division, Department of Medicine,Riyadh Military Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence to: Dr. Hatem Alameri, Assistant Professor ofMedicine, Unit of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine(38), King Saud University, PO Box: 2925, Riyadh 11461,Saudi Arabia. hatem.alameri@gmail.comTelephone: 966-1-4671491 Fax: 966-1-4672558Received: 2007-02-22Accepted: 2007-03-26AbstractAIM: To examine the utility of Six Minute Walk Test(6MWT) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD).METHODS: Two hundred and fifty subjects betweenthe ages of 18 and 80 (mean 47) years performed6MWT and the Six Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) wasmeasured.RESULTS: The subjects were categorized into fourgroups. Group A (n 45) healthy subjects (control);group B (n 49) chronic hepatitis B patients; group C(n 54) chronic hepatitis C patients; group D (n 98)liver cirrhosis patients. The four groups differed in termsof 6MWDs (P 0.001). The longest distance walked was421 47 m by group A, then group B (390 53 m),group C (357 72 m) and group D (306 111 m).The 6MWD correlated with age (r -0.482, P 0.01),hemoglobin (r 0.373, P 0.001) and albumin(r 0.311, P 0.001) levels. The Child-Pughclassification was negatively correlated with the 6MWDin cirrhosis (group D) patients (r -0.328, P 0.01).At the end of a 12 mo follow-up period, 15 of the 98cirrhosis patients had died from disease complications.The 6MWD for the surviving cirrhotic patients was longerthan for non-survivors (317 101 vs 245 145 m, P 0.021; 95% CI 11-132). The 6MWD was found to be anindependent predictor of survival (P 0.024).CONCLUSION: 6MWT is a useful tool for assessingphysical function in CLD patients. We suggest that 6MWDmay serve as a prognostic indicator in patients with livercirrhosis.www.wjgnet.com 2007 WJG . All rights reserved.Key words: Six Minute Walk Test; Chronic liver disease;Functional capacityAlameri HF, Sanai FM, Al Dukhayil M, Azzam NA, Al-SwatKA, Hersi AS, Abdo AA. Six minute walk test to assessfunctional capacity in chronic liver disease patients. World JGastroenterol 2007; 13(29): spINTRODUCTIONThe assessment of quality of life has a significant impacton the management of chronic liver disease (CLD)patients. Several studies have shown that CLD leads toa reduction in health-related quality of life, particularlyin terms of functional capacity [1-5]. Most such studiesexamining functional capacity involve questionnaires suchas the Medical Outcome Study Short Form Questionnaire(SF-36) and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire(CLDQ). These questionnaires are exclusively researchtools, and the recording of infor mation from suchquestionnaires can be difficult to incorporate into dailyclinical practice. While exercise tests can also be used tomeasure functional capacity, the sophisticated techniquesand complex interpretation involved usually mean thatthese tests can only be conducted in suitably equippedlaboratories with experienced personnel, which in turnmay only be available in specialized centers.The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is an easy andinexpensive sub-maximal exercise test and has been shownto have good reliability when used to assess functionalcapacity. The 6MWT has been used in addition andsometimes as an alternative to, other diagnostic tools inpatients with chronic cardiac, pulmonary, neuromuscularor renal diseases[6-11]. Roul and coworkers reported thatthe distance walked in six minutes had a sensitivity of89% and specificity of 60% for predicting the prognosisand disease outcomes in patients with heart failure [12].Another study showed that the Six Minute Walk Distance(6MWD) was an independent predictor of mortality inpatients with chronic obstructive lung diseases[13]. A studyexploring functional performance in 38 end-stage liver

Alameri HF et al . 6MWT in liver diseasedisease patients found that the 6MWD correlated withmuscle strength and exercise capacity as measured usingcardiopulmonary exercise tests. The same study reportedthat the 6MWD strongly correlated with all physicalperformance tests at three, six and 12 mo follow-up timesafter orthotopic liver transplantation[14].The present prospective study examined the use of the6MWT for assessing the functional capacity of chronicliver disease patients. The study compared the distanceswalked in six minutes by healthy subjects and patientswith different stages of liver disease, and investigatedcorrelations between the 6MWD and other clinical andbiochemical disease markers.MATERIALS AND METHODSPatientsThe study enrolled consecutive patients aged between18 and 80 years with chronic liver disease attending thehepatology outpatient clinics at King Khalid UniversityHospital (KKUH) and Riyadh Military Hospital overa 12 mo period (from January to December 2005). Allsubjects gave formal consent and the study was approvedby the departmental Ethics Committee. Study subjectswere categorized into four groups. Group A subjectswere sequentially selected healthy volunteers with noclinical history of liver diseases were recruited as controls.Group B subjects were patients with the followingprofile: hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive asdetermined by a commercial ELISA kit (DiagnosticsPasteur, Marnes la Coquette, France), hepatitis B DNApositive by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) basedassay (COBAS Amplicor, HBV monitor test, RocheDiagnostics, Switzerland) with a lower limit of detectionof 200 copies/mL, and with (1) either normal or raisedalanine transaminase (ALT) levels (determined on at leasttwo occasions separated by at least 3 mo), (2) normalserum bilirubin, albumin and International NormalizedRatio (INR), (3) normal complete blood count (CBC) or(4) normal abdominal ultrasound (US) without featuresof liver cirrhosis or portal hypertension. Group Csubjects were patients with the following profile: newlydiagnosed with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (i.e.antiHCV antibody, Ortho HCV ELISA, Ortho DiagnosticSystems, Inc., Raritan, New Jersey; RIBA HCV, ChironCorp., Emeryville, California) and HCV RNA positive(COBAS Amplicor, HCV monitor test, Roche Diagnostics,Switzerland) with a lower limit of detection of 50 IU/L,and raised ALT levels. Patients were excluded from groupsB and C if there was any abnormality in the CBC or anysigns of cirrhosis or portal hypertension on abdominal US.Group D subjects were patients with liver cirrhosis definedby any four of the following features of cirrhosis: (1)platelet count 100 109/L, (2) evidence of esophagealvarices on endoscopy, (3) ultrasonographic featuresconsistent with cirrhosis, (4) albumin level less than 30 g/L,(5) INR more than 1.4 and (6) bilirubin level more than30 µmol/L. Patients were also included in this group ifthere was histological evidence of liver cirrhosis regardlessof the above criteria.3997Patients who were HBsAg or anti-HCV positive for aperiod exceeding six months and who had not received anyantiviral therapy in the preceding six months were includedin the study. All participants had screening abdominalultrasonography (US) at the time of recruitment into thestudy. The US were performed and interpreted by trainedradiographers according to a standardized protocol, andthe records reviewed by the investigators. Cirrhosis wasdiagnosed ultrasonographically based on the appearanceof the liver surface, liver parenchymal texture, portal veinsize, splenic size, presence of ascites and varicose veins inthe portal and perisplenic area.Study exclusion criteria included: (1) HCV/HBVcoinfection; (2) identifiable other causes of chronic liverdisease defined as (high serum iron and ferritin, abnormalserum ceruloplasmin, history of significant alcoholconsumption, antinuclear antibody 1:320, antismoothmuscle antibody 1:320, antimitochondrial antibody 1:40); (3) history of hepatotoxic medications in thepreceding three months of presentation; (4) history ofantiviral therapy in the last six months. All subjects wereassessed initially by a senior physician and any patientswith clinical evidence of cardiopulmonary, neuromuscularor rheumatological diseases was excluded.To determine hemoglobin, platelet, liver enzymes,bilirubin, albumin and creatinine levels and coagulationprofiles, blood samples were obtained from all patientspreferably at the time of the 6MWT. Patients with livercirrhosis were further classified as stage A, B or C accordingto the modified Child-Pugh classification (CP)[15]. Resultsof all abnormal tests were provided to patients or theirimmediate relatives, as was deemed appropriate.6MWTThe 6MWT was conducted according to AmericanThoracic Society (ATS) guidelines and supervised byqualified technicians[16]. The technicians were blinded tothe grouping to which the patients belonged. In brief, thepatient was instructed to walk at his or her own pace alonga straight, flat 30 m hallway marked at one meter intervals.Heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation and Borgscore (based on an exertion scale where 0 no exertionand 10 very severe exertion) were measured at the start(0 min) and at the end (six minutes) of the walk test.Patients were asked to cover as much ground as possible insix minutes but allowed to stop if there were symptoms ofdyspnea or leg pain. The distance in meters was recordedat the end of the six minutes (i.e., the 6MWD).Statistical analysisAll data are expressed as mean SD. Comparisonsbetween two groups were made using unpaired Student’sT-tests. Comparisons between four groups were madeusing one-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffe posthoc multiple comparison test. Correlations between the6MWD and other variables were determined using Pearsoncorrelation coefficients analysis. Multiple regressionanalysis was used to identify independent relationshipsbetween the 6MWD and demographic variables. Inpatients with liver cirrhosis, both Cox’s proportionalwww.wjgnet.com

3998ISSN 1007-9327CN 14-1219/RWorld J GastroenterolTable 1 Clinical characteristics of the four groups of subjectsenrolled in the study (mean SD)AAugust 7, 2007Volume 1390r 0.481P 0.00180Group D(n 98)57 1264/3426.9 5.384 1792 1997.8 1.7597.1 2.80.66 1.341.68 2.00306 11194.9 54.628.3 6.886.2 63.194.8 76.9164.6 225.2180.7 129.444.0 58.986.8 39.1ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; AP: alkalinephosphatase; BMI: body mass index; BS: Borg scale; HR: heart rate; GGT:gamma glutamyl 1401201008060C010020030040050070Albumin (g/L)60080r 0.311P 0.00160hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were usedto determine whether the 6MWD had an impact onsurvival. Cox’s proportional hazard regression model wasused to estimate the relative risk of the following variableson survival: age, male gender, CP score, the 6MWD,hemoglobin, albumin, alkaline phosphatase and creatininelevels, and prothrombin time. Survival was also analyzedusing the Kaplan-Meier method and survival curves werecompared according to four groups of walked distanceusing log rank tests. A P value 0.05 was considered toindicate a significant difference. All data were processedusing SPSS 13.0 for Windows.600r 0.373P 0.001180Hemoglobin (g/L)Group AGroup BGroup C(n 45) (n 48)(n 58)Age (yr)35 938 1248 12Gender (M:F)22/2322/2742/16BMI28.0 6.3 33.3 20.630.0 6.4HR/min Baseline78 1285 14End86 1394 17O2 %Baseline98.1 1.096.7 9.3End98.2 0.7698.1 1.1BSBaseline0.11 0.450.07 0.24End0.53 0.730.98 1.346MWD (m)421 47390 53357 72Hemoglobin (g/L)128.7 44.1 136.2 20.3Albumin (g/L)37.9 6.137.6 6.3ALT (U/L)128.5 232.2 89.7 54.2AST (U/L)55.8 70.256.4 34.0GGT (U/L)47.7 50.0 101.6 83.3ALP (U/L)96.7 36.4 102.8 42.1Bilirubin (µmol/L)11.1 6.314.9 12.8Creatinine (µmol/L)70.3 21.468.0 16.6Age (yr)70VariableNumber 29504030201000100200300400500600Distance (m)Figure 1 The relationship between the 6MWD and clinical variables in patientswith chronic liver diseases. A: Negative correlation with age; B: Positive correlationof 6MWD with level of hemoglobin; C: Positive correlation of 6MWD with level ofalbumin.RESULTSPatient characteristicsThe demographic features, laboratory data and the 6MWDfor the four groups are summarized in Table 1. There werea total of 250 subjects in the study (60% male): 45 (18%of the total number of subjects) in group A, 49 (19.6%) ingroup B, 58 (23.2%) in group C and 98 (39.2%) in group D.Both group A and B were similar in terms of age, heightand weight, while the group C mean age was greater thanthat of group A and B. Group B and C did not differin terms of laboratory results. The mean age for groupD was greater than that of other groups. Compared togroup B and C, group D subjects had lower hemoglobinlevels, higher liver enzyme levels, hypoalbuminemia, higherbilirubin levels and a higher coagulation time.6MWTThe 6MWD differed between the four groups. The6MWD for group B (389 53 m) was shorter than forgroup A (421 47 m) (P 0.02; 95% CI 2-43). The6MWDs for both group A and B were longer than forgroup C (357 71 m) (P 0.01; 95% CI 39-88 and P 0.01;www.wjgnet.com95% CI 7-56 respectively). Group D (306 111 m) had ashorter 6MWD than any of group A (P 0.001; 95% CI105-124), B (P 0.001; 95% CI 72-93) or C (P 0.001;95% CI 36-65).The 6MWD was found to be inversely correlated withage (r -0.482, P 0.001, 95% CI 3.8-2.4)) and Borgscores at the beginning (r -0.518, P 0.001; 95% CI-59 to -37) and end (r -0.581, P 0.001; 95% CI -40 to-27) of the test. The 6MWD was found to be positivelycorrelated with height (r 0.281, P 0.01; 95% CI 1.3-3.2),hemoglobin level (r 0.373, P 0.001; 95% CI 0.48-0.99)and albumin level (r 0.311, P 0.001; 95% CI 2.1-5.3)(Figure 1). Linear regression analysis showed that the bestdemographic and laboratory predictors for the 6MWD inthe disease groups were age, Borg score and hemoglobinlevel (P 0.001 and r2 value ranging between 0.336 and0.526).Of the 98 liver cirrhosis (group D) patients, 33 wereCP class A, 39 class B and 27 class C. The 6MWD for CPclass A patients was 356 84 m, which was longer thanthe distance walked by either CP class B (296 93 m;

Alameri HF et al . 6MWT in liver disease3999Table 2 Characteristics of liver cirrhosis patients in terms ofthose who survived and those who had died during the studyperiodTable 3 Variables associated with survival according tounivariate and multivariate Cox regression analysisVariableNon-survivors (n 15) Survivors (n 83)Age (yr)61 1055 11CP score10.0 2.38.5 2.2a6MWD (m)245 145317 101aO2% Baseline97.3 1.797.9 1.5End97.4 3.097.2 1.6Hemoglobin (g/L)114.7 14.7127.6 17.7bProthrombin time (s)16.1 5.616.5 4.5ALT (U/L)90.5 82.785.4 59.5AST (U/L)107.1 62.692.3 79.4ALP (U/L)242.2 141.8169.5 124.7Albumin (g/L)24.2 5.629.0 6.6aBilirubin (µmol/L)67.4 65.140.1 56.9Creatinine (µmol/L)114.4 86.081.7 090.820.770.500.450.0110.0980.002VariableCP tinineHazard ratio (95% CI)1.349 (1.062-1.713)0.995 (0.991-0.999)0.901 (0.829-0.978)0.966 (0.941-0.992)1.003 (1.000-1.005)1.016 (1.007-1.024)0.994 (0.989-0.998)1.003 (1.000-1.006)1.018 (1.009-1.027)P0.0140.0270.0130.0120.042 0.00010.0240.027 0.0001ALP: alkaline phosphatase, CP: Child Pugh, MV: multivariate analysis,UV: univariate analysis. Variables not found to be associated with survivalexcluded from the table.ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALP:alkaline phosphatase; CP: Child Pugh; GGT: gamma glutamyl transpeptidase.aP 0.05, bP 0.01 vs non-survivors.100P 0.005) or CP class C (262 130 m; P 0.003)patients. There was no significant difference between CPclass B and CP class C patients in terms of the distancewalked. The 6MWD was negatively correlated with CPclassification (r -0.328, P 0.001; 95% CI -74 to -19),and positively cor related with the level of oxygensaturation at the beginning and end of the test (r 0.402,P 0.0001 and r 0.283, P 0.018, respectively).Survival (%)80Survival analysisPatients with liver cirrhosis were followed from the timeof 6MWT until the end of the study period or death.During a mean follow-up period of 42 13 (range, 4 to52) wk, fifteen (15.3%) of the 98 cirrhosis patients (groupD) died from disease complications. The 6MWD for thesurviving cirrhotic patients was longer than that for nonsurvivors (317 101 vs 245 145 m, P 0.021; 95% CI11-132). In addition, the non-survivors had a higher meanCP score and higher alkaline phosphatase and creatininelevels, and lower albumin and hemoglobin levels (Table 2).The effect of a range of variables on survival wasdetermined using Cox regression analysis (Table 3).Univariate analysis showed anemia, hypoalbuminemia, highCP scores, a low 6MWD and elevated alkaline phosphataseand creatinine levels were associated with shorter survival.Multivariate analysis showed that a low 6MWD (P 0.024), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (P 0.027) andcreatinine (P 0.0001) levels were associated with shortersurvival in cirrhosis patients.Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was used to assesscirrhosis patients in terms of the distance walked (Figure 2).Patients were categorized according to the distance walkedinto four groups; first quartile (6MWD 250 m), secondquartile (250 m 6MWD 319 m), third quartile (319 m 6MWD 397 m) and fourth quartile (6MWD 397 m).Log rank testing showed that those who walked less than250 m had a shorter survival (P 0.021) compared to theother groups, and suggested that lower survival was linkedto a lesser 6MWD.Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to a four quartile distribution ofthe 6MWD in patients with cirrhosis. P 0.05 between patients who walked 250 mand those who walked 250 m or more.60First quartile ( 250 m)40Second quartile (250-319 m)Third quartile (319-397 m)2000Fourth quartile ( 397 m)102030405060t /wkDISCUSSIONThe present study showed that the 6MWT can be used todetermine the functional capacity of CLD patients. Thedistance walked by CLD patients was found to be lowerthan that walked by healthy subjects. Furthermore, interms of different chronic liver diseases, the study foundthat the 6MWD was lower for cirrhosis patients comparedto patients with chronic hepatitis B or C infections.The distance walked by hepatitis B patients was found tobe less than that walked by matched healthy individuals. Thiswas found to be the case even for the group of hepatitisB patients with normal liver enzymes results (i.e., inactivecarriers). Previous studies dealing with the effect of hepatitisB infection on physical function have provided contradictoryfindings. While one study found that 60% of hepatitis Bcarrier status patients reported a decrease in physical andpsychological health as measured using a questionnaire[1],another study found that this was not the case[2]. To ourknowledge, the present study is the first to use an exercisetest to objectively measure physical capacity in non-cirrhotichepatitis B patients, rather than a questionnaire.The current study also found that the distance walked byhepatitis C patients was less than that walked by hepatitis Bpatients or control subjects. Previously, physical performancein hepatitis C patients was mostly explored using quality-www.wjgnet.com

4000ISSN 1007-9327CN 14-1219/RWorld J Gastroenterolof-life questionnaires. An earlier study examining physicalfunction using the SF-36 questionnaire found that functionwas lower in patients with chronic hepatitis C infectioncompared to control subjects or patients with hepatitis B,and that this decrease was unrelated to the extent of liverinjury according to liver biopsy and liver enzyme tests[2]. Thestudy concluded that the physical impairment may be relatedto factors other than liver damage. In the present study,hepatitis C patients walked significantly shorter distancesin six minutes than hepatitis B patients, even though bothgroups were similar in terms of liver enzyme test results,hemoglobin levels, albumin levels and coagulation profiles.Other studies have reported that there are severalpotential factors that can contribute to the physical functionlimitations in cirrhosis patients, including muscle strength,deconditioning, fatigue and neuropsychiatric factors inaddition to hepatopulmonary syndrome and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy[10,17,18]. In the present study, liver cirrhosis patientshad the lowest 6MWD of the four groups tested, and the6MWD was found to correlate with the severity of cirrhosisas measured using the Child-Pugh classification. Consistentwith these findings, several studies showed a moderate-tosevere impairment in exercise capacity in cirrhosis patientsas measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing[17,19-22]. Inone such study, the 6MWD correlated with the maximumoxygen uptake (VO 2 max) as measured using a cycleergometer in pre-liver transplantation patients at differentstages of cirrhosis, and that correlation remained over a oneyear follow-up period after transplantation[14].In the present study, the 6MWD was negatively correlated with patient age, and age was found to be anindependent predictor of the 6MWD. This finding isconsistent with various studies of both healthy subjects andchronic disease patients[23-25]. The current study also foundthat the 6MWD was positively correlated with hemoglobinand albumin levels, but did not correlate with liver enzymelevels. This finding is consistent with previous reportsshowing that for severe heart failure patients, anemia wasassociated with poor physical function, while increasinghemoglobin levels were correlated with improved exercisecapacity as measured in cardiopulmonary exercise tests[26,27].Previous studies also found that the severity of physicallimitation in relation to liver biochemical testing was moreevident in liver cirrhosis patients compared to those withother chronic liver diseases[21,28,29].Previous reports showed that several factors correlatewith mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. Multivariateanalysis in the present study found that the 6MWD waslinked to mortality. In our cohort, walking less than 250m was associated with decreased survival in patients withliver cirrhosis. Consistent with this finding, Bowen et al[30],reported that the distance walked was better associatedwith survival than other signs of disease severity likepulmonary function results, arterial blood gas results,age and comorbid conditions in patients with advancelung diseases. Paciocco et al[31] found that there was an18% reduction in mortality with each 50 m increase inwalked distance in pulmonary hypertension patients, withsignificant mortality being reported in patients walking lessthan 300 m. To our knowledge, the present study is thefirst to investigate the 6MWD as a predictor of survivalwww.wjgnet.comAugust 7, 2007Volume 13Number 29in patients with non-cardiopulmonary disease. Thus, the6MWD may serve as an additional prognostic marker inliver cirrhosis patients.Our study has a few potential limitations. One suchlimitation is that the control group subjects were mostlyrecruited from within the institute (including hospitalemployees and medical students), and may therefore consistof more highly educated individuals with a higher socioeconomic status compared to the CLD groups, which aremore likely to come from the broader general population.Another limitation is the possibility that the distancewalked was not assessed accurately because the 6MWTwas performed just once. However, other investigatorshave shown that in patients with chronic renal failure, theimprovement in the distance walked was only 3.7% whenthe test was repeated after 48 h, suggesting that the 6MWTmay be more reproducible in non-cardiopulmonary diseasepatients[32].Finally, the present 6MWD data were not compared withdata obtained from other physical function assessments suchas cardiopulmonary exercise tests. While cycling ergometertesting was not undertaken due to our limited experiencewith this assessment tool in our community, we are currentlyexamining correlations between the 6MWD data andquality-of-life questionnaire responses in CLD patients.In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the 6MWDcorrelated with the type of liver diseases, and it wasan independent predictor of survival in liver cirrhosispatients. The utility of 6MWD should be further exploredto evaluate the change of distance walked over time or inresponse to therapeutic measures in patients with CLD.REFERENCES123456789Lok AS, van Leeuwen DJ, Thomas HC, Sherlock S. Psychosocialimpact of chronic infection with hepatitis B virus on Britishpatients. Genitourin Med 1985; 61: 279-282Foster GR, Goldin RD, Thomas HC. Chronic hepatitis C virusinfection causes a significant reduction in quality of life in theabsence of cirrhosis. Hepatology 1998; 27: 209-212Bianchi G, Loguercio C, Sgarbi D, Abbiati R, Chen CH, DiPierro M, Disalvo D, Natale S, Marchesini G. Reduced qualityof life in patients with chronic hepatitis C: effects of interferontreatment. Dig Liver Dis 2000; 32: 398-405Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Amodio P, Salerno F, Merli M,Panella C, Loguercio C, Apolone G, Niero M, Abbiati R.Factors associated with poor health-related quality of life ofpatients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 170-178Sainz-Barriga M, Baccarani U, Scudeller L, Risaliti A,Toniutto PL, Costa MG, Ballestrieri M, Adani GL, LorenzinD, Bresadola V, Ramacciatto G, Bresadola F. Quality-of-lifeassessment before and after liver transplantation. TransplantProc 2005; 37: 2601-2614Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, Woodcock AA, Geddes DM.Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982; 284: 1607-1608Guyatt GH, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Fallen EL, Pugsley SO,Taylor DW, Berman LB. The 6-minute walk: a new measureof exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure. CanMed Assoc J 1985; 132: 919-923Langenfeld H, Schneider B, Grimm W, Beer M, Knoche M,Riegger G, Kochsiek K. The six-minute walk--an adequateexercise test for pacemaker patients? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1990; 13: 1761-1765Montgomery PS, Gardner AW. The clinical utility of a sixminute walk test in peripheral arterial occlusive disease

Alameri HF et al . 6MWT in liver disease101112131415161718192021patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 706-711Deboeck G, Niset G, Vachiery JL, Moraine JJ, Naeije R.Physiological response to the six-minute walk test in pulmonaryarterial hypertension. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 667-672Savci S, Inal-Ince D, Arikan H, Guclu-Gunduz A, CetisliKorkmaz N, Armutlu K, Karabudak R. Six-minute walkdistance as a measure of functional exercise capacity in multiplesclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 1365-1371Roul G, Germain P, Bareiss P. Does the 6-minute walk testpredict the prognosis in patients with NYHA class II or IIIchronic heart failure? Am Heart J 1998; 136: 449-457Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, Casanova C, Montes de Oca M,Mendez RA, Pinto Plata V, Cabral HJ. The body-mass index,airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity index inchronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2004; 350:1005-1012Beyer N, Aadahl M, Strange B, Kirkegaard P, Hansen BA, MohrT, Kjaer M. Improved physical performance after orthotopicliver transplantation. Liver Transpl Surg 1999; 5: 301-309Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, WilliamsR. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophagealvarices. Br J Surg 1973; 60: 646-649Brooks D, Solway S, Gibbons WJ. ATS statement on sixminute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003; 167: 1287Campillo B, Fouet P, Bonnet JC, Atlan G. Submaximal oxygenconsumption in liver cirrhosis. Evidence of severe functionalaerobic impairment. J Hepatol 1990; 10: 163-167Chiang LL, Yu CT, Liu CY, Lo YL, Kuo HP, Lin HC. Sixmonth nocturnal nasal positive pressure ventilation improvesrespiratory muscle capacity and exercise endurance in patientswith chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure. J Formos MedAssoc 2006; 105: 459-467Kelbaek H, Rabøl A, Brynjolf I, Eriksen J, Bonnevie O,Godtfredsen J, Munck O, Lund JO. Haemodynamic responseto exercise in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis. Clin Physiol1987; 7: 35-41Epstein SK, Ciubotaru RL, Zilberberg MD, Kaplan LM, Jacoby C,Freeman R, Kaplan MM. Analysis of impaired exercise capacityin patients with cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 1701-1707Wiesinger GF, Quittan M, Zimmermann K, Nuhr M, WichlasM, Bodingbauer M, Asari R, Berlakovich G, Crevenna R, FialkaMoser V, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Physical performance and40012223242526272829303132health-related quality of life in men on a liver transplantationwaiting list. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 260-265Wong F, Girgrah N, Graba J, Allidina Y, Liu P, Blendis L. Thecardiac response to exercise in cirrhosis. Gut 2001; 49: 268-275Gibbons WJ, Fruchter N, Sloan S, Levy RD. Reference valuesfor a multiple repetition 6-minute walk test in healthy adultsolder than 20 years. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2001; 21: 87-93Enright PL, Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the sixminute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998

S Hersi, Ayman A Abdo, Unit of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Faisal M Sanai, Hepatology Division, Department of Medicine, Riyadh Military Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Correspondence to: Dr. Hatem Alameri, Assistant Professor of Med

Related Documents:

2715 M STREET, NW SUITE 200 WASHINGTON, DC 20007 202.333.0303 www.MILLERWALKER.com 2300 N STREET NW - WASHINGTON, DC 5 Minute Walk Time 10 Minute Walk Time 15 Minute Walk Time WALK TIME 5 MIN WALK 10 MIN WALK 15 MIN WALK 2020 Daytime Population 10,

Newari Traditional Massage 60 minute 5749 90 minute 7499 Hot Stone Massage 60 minute 5999 90 minute 7999 Pregnancy Massage (Pre-Post Natal) 60 minute 6999 90 minute 8999 Traditional Herbal Nepali Massage 60 minute 5749 90 minute 7499 Indian Head M

Radio-paging services (starting 076) 45.84p call Personal numbering services (starting 070) 0p 1 minute minute Call forwarding services (e.g. 07744, 07755) 45.84p 1 minute minute ACCESS CHARGE FOR: Directory enquiries numbers (118 numbers) # 54.16p 1 minute minute Premium Rate call charges Cost per minute Cost Per Call Minimum Call Charge .

30 Ten-Minute Plays from the Actors Theatre of Louisville for 4, 5, and 6 Actors 2004: The Best 10-Minute Plays for Two Actors 2004: The Best 10-Minute Plays for Three or More Actors 2005: The Best 10-Minute Plays for Two Actors 2005: The Best 10-Minute Plays for Three or More Actors 2006: The Best 10-Minute Plays for Two Actors 2006: The Best .

NUMBER NAME OF TEST CENTER ROOM NUMBER SAT Reasoning Test — General Directions Timing You will have 3 hours and 45 minutes to work on this test. There are ten separately timed sections: One 25-minute essay Six other 25-minute sections Two 20-minute sections One 10-minute section You may work on only one section at a time.

Walk long distance have difficulty She can walk to half a km by stopping. If not can’t . Might be cause no need to walk for that long distance Cannot walk continuously have to take rest Haven't walk for that distance but sure can walk Can run one round in male‘ Not sure 0 100 200 3

GUIDED NATURE WALK & BIRD WATCHING STATUS FNR US FR US EAC UGX Birding 30 25 20,000 Day Nature Walk in BINP, MGNP, KNP, MENP, SNP, RMNP 30 15 10,000 Day Nature Walk (MFNP, QENP, LMNP, KVNP, Kapkwai sector and all Reserves) 15 10 10,000 Night Nature Walk 40 20 15,000 Gorge Walk, Mgahinga 30 15 15,000 Students Guided Walk (per 6 people) 10,000

Y to schedule your massage appointment with our Massage Therapist. Member: Nonmember: 30 - 30 minute massage 35 - 30 minute massage 50 - 60 minute massage 60 - 60 minute massage 85 - 90 minute massage 95 - 90 minute massage PERSONAL WELLNESS TRAINING (YOUTH & ADULT) One-on-on