Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew - Cessna
CessnaDocument Reference #525ALLOSDFC-01SignatureMARCUS S.VANDERPOOL, Pilot and Maintenance Training, Textron AviationOperational Suitability Data (OSD)Flight CrewCESSNA 525, 525A, 525B, 525C(CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ1 , CJ2 , CJ3, CJ3 , CJ4, M2)Rev. 128 July 2015
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC525CESSNA 525, 525A, 525B, 525C(CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ1 , CJ2 , CJ3, CJ3 , CJ4, M2)Operational Suitability Data (OSD) – Flight CrewRevision RecordRev. No.ContentDateOEB ReportRev 2Operational Evaluation Board Report Cessna 525(CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ1 , CJ2 , CJ3)22 Oct 2010OEB ReportRev 1Operational Evaluation Board Report CessnaCitation 525C (CJ4)22 Oct 2010OSD FCOriginalOSD FCRev 1Replaces and incorporates the OEB reports for theCessna 525 (CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ1 , CJ2 , CJ3) andfor the Cessna 525 (CJ4).20 Jun 2014Addition of the Cessna 525 M2 operationalsuitability data.OSD Data for Cessna 525 CJ3 incorporated.OSD FC C525 – Revision 128 Jul 2015Page 2 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC525ContentsRevision Record . 2Contents . 3Acronyms . 5Preamble . 81.Introduction . 82.Operational Evaluation CJ / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3 . 83.Operational Evaluation CJ4 . 94.Operational Evaluation M2 and CJ3 . 105.Operational Evaluations – Group Composition . 10Operational Suitability Data (OSD) – Flight Crew1.Aircraft Type Designation and Pilot License Endorsement . 112.Aircraft Specifics . 112.1CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ1 , CJ2 and CJ3 . 112.2CJ4 . 132.3M2 and CJ3 . 192.4Customization of Procedures and Checklists, SOPs . 202.5Aircraft Approach Category . 212.6All Weather / Low Visibility Operations . 212.7Part-CAT, Subpart D – Instruments, Data, Equipment . 213.Operator Differences Requirements (ODR) . 214.Master Differences Requirements (MDR) . 225.4.1MDR Tables . 224.2Multiple Differences . 22Specifications for Training . 235.1All CE-525 variants . 235.2CJ / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3 Training . 235.2.1 CJ / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3 Initial Type Rating Training . 235.2.2 CJ / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3 Differences Training . 235.2.3 TASE . 235.3CJ4 Training . 235.3.1 Initial Training . 245.3.2 Differences Training from the CJ4 . 245.3.2.1 TASE . 255.4CE-525 M2 or CJ3 Training . 255.4.1 M2 or CJ3 Initial type rating training . 255.4.1.1 TASE . 26OSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 3 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC5255.4.2 M2 or CJ3 Differences Training . 265.4.2.1 Prerequisites . 265.4.2.2 Training Footprint . 265.4.2.3 Training Content . 265.4.2.4 Demonstration of Proficiency . 285.5Differences Training – Avionics and EFIS . 295.6In-Aircraft Training . 305.7Transition from SP to MP Operations (or vice versa) . 306.Recurrent Training (all variants) . 307.Specification for Checking . 317.1Checking – LST / LPC / OPC (all variants) . 317.2Recurrent Checking – LPC / OPC (all variants) . 317.3Line Checks . 328.Line Flying Under Supervision (LIFUS) / Supervised Operating Experience(SOE) / Familiarization Flights . 329.Recent Experience and Currency . 339.1Specifications for Recent Experience . 339.2Specifications for Currency . 33Appendix 1CJ4 Initial Type Rating Training . 341.Theoretical Training . 342.Practical Training . 343.Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE) . 35Appendix 2CE-525 M2 or CJ3 Initial Type Rating Training – Footprint . 37Appendix 3CE-525 Transition Training MP to SP (and vice versa) . 381.MP to SP Transition . 382.SP to MP Transition . 393.Mixed SP and MP operations . 39Appendix 4Pre-requisites and training for an initial type rating on the CE-525 . 40Appendix 5Summary of Characteristics of the CE-525 Variants . 41OSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 4 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC525AcronymsACAS . Airborne Collision Avoidance SystemADC . Air Data ComputerAHRS . Attitude & Heading Reference SystemAMC . Acceptable Means of ComplianceAMM . Airport Moving MapATO . Approved Training OrganisationATPL . Airline Transport Pilot LicenceCAS . Crew Alerting SystemCBT . Computer Based TrainingCDU . Control Display Unit (FMS)CPD . Common Procedures Document for conducting Operational EvaluationBoards, dated 10 June 2004CPL . Commercial Pilot LicenceCRM . Crew Resource ManagementCS-FCD . Certification Specifications for Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight CrewData CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014CS-FSTD(A) . Certification Specifications for Aeroplane Flight Simulation Training Devicesof 4 July 2012ECL . Electronic Check ListEFB . Electronic Flight BagEFIS . Electronic Flight Instrumentation SystemEGPWS . Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning SystemESIS . Electronic Standby Instrument SystemEU-OPS . Commission Regulation (EC) No 859/2008 of 20 August 2008, amendingCouncil Regulation (EEC) No 3922/91 as regard common technicalrequirements and administrative procedures applicable to commercialtransportation by aeroplaneEICAS . Engine Indicating and Crew Alerting SystemFADEC . Full Authority Digital Engine ControlFD . Flight DirectorFFS . Full Flight Simulator (Level C/D)FMS . Flight Management SystemFPT . Flat Panel TrainerFSI . Flight Safety InternationalFSTD . Flight Simulation Training DeviceFTD . Flight Training DeviceOSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 5 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC525GDU. Garmin Display UnitGM . Guidance MaterialGPS . Global Positioning SystemGTC . Garmin Touch Screen ControllerHPA . High Performance AircraftIEM . JAA Interpretative and Explanatory MaterialIFIS . Integrated Flight Information SystemJAA . Joint Aviation AuthoritiesLPC . License Proficiency CheckLST . License Skill TestMCC . Multi-Crew CooperationMDR . Master Differences RequirementsMEL . Minimum Equipment ListMFD . Multifunction DisplayMMEL . Master Minimum Equipment ListMP . Multi-PilotODR . Operator Differences RequirementsOEB . Operational Evaluation BoardOPC . Operator Proficiency CheckOSD . Operational Suitability DataOTD . Other Training DevicePart-ARA . Annex VI to Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012 of 30 March 2012amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technicalrequirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrewpursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and ofthe Council (as amended)Part-ARO . Annex II to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 layingdown technical requirements and administrative procedures related to airoperations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the EuropeanParliament and of the Council (as amended)Part-CAT . Annex IV to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 layingdown technical requirements and administrative procedures related to airoperations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the EuropeanParliament and of the Council (as amended)Part-FCL . Annex I to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related tocivil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of theEuropean Parliament and of the Council (as amended)Part-ORA . Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EU) No 290/2012 of 30 March 2012amending Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 laying down technicalrequirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrewpursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and ofOSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 6 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC525the Council (as amended)Part-ORO . Annex III to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 layingdown technical requirements and administrative procedures related to airoperations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the EuropeanParliament and of the Council (as amended)Part-SPA. Annex V to Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 of 05 Oct 2012 layingdown technical requirements and administrative procedures related to airoperations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the EuropeanParliament and of the Council (as amended)PIC . Pilot In CommandPF . Pilot FlyingPFD . Primary Flight DisplayPNF . Pilot Non FlyingQRH . Quick Reference HandbookRoute Sector . as defined in Part-FCL [“Route sector" means a flight comprising take-off,departure, cruise of not less than 15 minutes, arrival, approach and landingphases]RVSM . Reduced Vertical Separation MinimumSFD . Standby Flight DisplaySOE . Supervised Operating ExperienceSOP . Standard Operating ProceduresSP . Single-PilotTASE . Training Areas of Special EmphasisTAWS . Terrain Awareness & Warning SystemOSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 7 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight CrewC525Preamble1.IntroductionWhere references are made to requirements and where extracts of reference texts are provided,these are at the amendment state at the date of evaluation or publication of this document. Usersshould take account of subsequent amendments to any references, in particular concerningrequirement for civil aviation aircrew and air operations.Determinations made in this document are based on the evaluations of specific configurations ofaircraft models, equipped in a given configuration and in accordance with current regulations andguidance.Modifications and upgrades to the aircraft evaluated require additional OSD assessment for typedesignation, training / checking / currency, operational credits, and other elements within the scopeof the OSD evaluations.In accordance with Commission Regulation (EU) No 69/2014 of 27 Jan 2014, the OperationalSuitability Data contained in this document are identified as follows:[M] . mandatory Operational Suitability Data, bearing the status of rule (see GM No 3 to21A.15(d))[AMC] . non-mandatory Operational Suitability Data, bearing the status of Acceptable Meansof Compliance (see GM No 3 to 21A.15(d))The certification basis for the OSD Flight Crew data contained in this document is CS-FCD, InitialIssue, dated 30 January 2014.2.Operational Evaluation CJ / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3EASA evaluated the CE-525 CJ / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3 series aircraft in April 2007. Theevaluation was based on the EASA Terms of References for OEBs, the CPD, and the processesdetailed in the JAA Administrative and Guidance Material, Section One, Part Two, Chapter 5 andJAR-FCL 1 including associated appendices, AMC and IEM. Compliance was evaluated againstrequirements of EU-OPS, JAR-FCL 1 and JAR-FSTD.The OEB team consisted of one pilot who was initially trained on the CJ, flew both the CJ and theCJ2 aircraft, attended the CJ2 recurrent training programme and the differences training betweenCJ2 and CJ2 followed by training between the CJ2 and the CJ3. Training was provided by FlightSafety International (FSI) in Wichita, Kansas. Each training sequence was validated by checking.An FFS was used for normal operational procedures, use of normal, abnormal and emergencychecklists and practical operation of aircraft. No FTD was available.OSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 8 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew3.C525Operational Evaluation CJ4An operational evaluation of the CJ4 was requested on 02 Mar 2010. The evaluation was based onthe EASA Terms of References for OEBs, the CPD, and the processes detailed in the JAAAdministrative and Guidance Material, Section One, Part Two, Chapter 5 and JAR-FCL 1 includingassociated appendices, AMC and IEM. Compliance was evaluated against requirements of EUOPS, JAR-FCL 1 and JAR-FSTD.A T-2 test was performed on 25-28 Jan 2010 as a basis for a C525 single license endorsement. AT-5 test for SP type rating training was performed in June 2010 at the FSI facilities in Wichita, KS.Operational suitability flights were completed on 24 Jun 2010 (on aircraft N525CZ). As a secondpart of the evaluation, 3 complete T-3 tests evaluating differences training from the CJ1 to the CJ4and ‘reverse’ differences training from the CJ4 to both the CJ1 and the CJ3 were completed. Anassessment of the training implications for operating the CJ4 with a MP crew was made.The EASA OEB Section Business Jet Manager, the OEB team members and operational andcertification experts have participated to evaluate operational suitability, operational documentation,including MMEL, and a number of training courses (single pilot/FSTD, and 3 Differences Trainingmodules). As part of this evaluation process, the Normal, Abnormal, and Emergency procedureswere reviewed in the aircraft and recommendations for improvements and/or optimization havebeen implemented as appropriate.The following optional equipment was evaluated: 2nd FMS / GPS / DME Mark V EGPWS ADFThe following optional equipment was not formally evaluated.Where operational approval issought for the use of any of these systems or any optional systems and equipment that maybecome available, a separate evaluation may be required. XM broadcast / Graphical Weather Datalink / ACARS Lightning Detection Stormscope FMS Performance DB Integrated Electronic Checklist Flight Data RecorderOSD FC C525 – Revision 1Page 9 of 42
Operational Suitability Data – Flight Crew4.C525Operational Evaluation M2 and CJ3 An operational evaluation of the CE-525 M2 and CJ3 was conducted in a joint FAA/EASAoperational evaluation during the period July 2013 to June 2015. The EASA evaluation was basedon CS-FCD and the applicable requirements for civil aviation aircrew and air operations.A T-2 test was performed and confirmed no handling qualities differences from the base aircraftCE-525 CJ1 and the CE-525 M2 and CJ3 . A T-3 test performed on 17-21 Mar 2014 confirmedthe proposed differences training from CE-525 CJ1 / CJ2 / CJ3 / CJ4 variants to the M2 andCJ3 . Initial full type rating training was successfully evaluated on 11-26 Mar 2014. The M2 andCJ3 was also evaluated for compliance with the requirements contained in Part-CAT, Subpart D –Instruments, Data, Equipment.Operational Evaluations – Group Composition5.NameOrganizationFunctionTom Kieffaber 3)FAAFSB ChairmanCharles Miller 3)FAATeam MemberRandall Sizemore 3)FAATeam MemberHan
Operational Evaluation Board Report Cessna Citation 525C (CJ4) 22 Oct 2010 OSD FC Original Replaces and incorporates the OEB reports for the Cessna 525 (CJ, CJ1, CJ2, CJ1 , CJ2 , CJ3) and for the Cessna 525 (CJ4). Addition of the Cessna 525 M2 operational suitability data. 20 Jun 2014 OSD FC Rev 1 OSD Data for Cessna 525 CJ3 incorporated.
Flight Crew Gulfstream GV / GV-SP (G500/G550) / GIV-X (G450/G350) 21 May 2015 . Operational Suitability Data - Flight Crew G-V . Crew Resource Management CS-FCD .Certification Specifications for Operational Suitability Data (OSD) Flight Crew Data CS-FCD, Initial issue, 31 January 2014 .
If the OSD menu is closed, press to open the Viewing Modes menu. (3) Minus button If the OSD menu is open, press to navigate backward through the OSD menu and decrease adjustment levels. If the OSD menu is closed, press to adjust screen brightness. (4) Menu button Press to open the OSD menu, select a menu item from the OSD, or close the OSD menu.
Ceph orchestrator: OSD Once the hosts are added, we can list the available devices Then we can add the available devices with: ceph orch apply osd --all-available-devices or ceph orch daemon add osd : Or remove from the map and host with: ceph orch osd rm if the osd is marked as destroyed 88
2. Menu Press to open the OSD menu, select a menu item from the OSD, or close the OSD menu. 3-5. Function buttons Use these buttons to navigate through the OSD menu based on the indicators next to the buttons that are activated while the OSD menu is op
CYCLOPS OSD USER MANUAL 5.0 Thank you for choosing CYCLOPS OSD V5.0 New features: CYCLOPS OSD V5.0 is incorporated with Autopilot function and infrared attitude sensor capable of controlling aircraft's attitude, and is able to control the aircraft with aileron and elevator based on preset controlling parameters.
11、 When OSD detect 0 voltages on the power battery, it will not display voltage, current and mAh consumed of power battery. 12、 TORNADO OSD can display RSSI voltage (receiver signal strength indicating voltage) measuring range: 0.1-3.3V, when this voltage is below 0.1v, OSD will not display this parameter.
11、 When OSD detect 0 voltages on the power battery, it will not display voltage, current and mAh consumed of power battery. 12、 TORNADO OSD can display RSSI voltage (receiver signal strength indicating voltage) measuring range: 0.1-3.3V, when this voltage is below 0.1v, OSD will not display this parameter.
Introduction A description logic (DL) knowledge base (KB) consists of a terminological box (TBox), storing conceptual knowledge, and an assertion box (ABox), storing data. Typical applica-tions of KBs involve answering queries over incomplete data sources (ABoxes) augmented by ontologies (TBoxes) that provide additional information about the domain of interest as well as a convenient .
