Psychometric Characteristics Of The Revised Attitudes .

2y ago
18 Views
2 Downloads
510.60 KB
17 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Konnor Frawley
Transcription

Psychometric characteristics ofthe Revised Attitudes towardIntimate Partner Violence Scaleamong College students inCosta RicaDerby Munoz-Rojasa, Brian E. McCabeb, & Rosa Gonzalez-GuardababUniversity of Costa Rica, School of NursingUniversity of Miami, School of Nursing and Health Studies

Attitudes toward dating violence Key points about dating violence Dating violence is a global problem that affects young adults around the world Dating violence might lead to long term consequences Survivor, perpetrator, family, and societyExtent and nature of dating violence might be different among and within countries Indeed, adolescents and emerging adults are disproportionally affected by partner abuseIn Costa Rica indicate that DV is a multi-causal phenomenon, and is strongly influenced by culturalvalues and practicesAttitudes toward dating violence (ATDV) has been identified as a prominent area totarget efforts addressing this problem Approval of dating violence has been linked to blaming the victim, normalization, and justificationof violence Healthy attitudes toward dating violence has been related to low prevalence of dating violence(Ellsberg, Jansen, Heise, Watts, & Garcia-Moreno, 2008; Campbell, 2002Family Violence Prevention Foundation [FVPF], 2012)

Purpose Valid assessment tools are required to study this phenomena. Yet, few instruments have been develop to assess dating violenceattitudes among college students Only a small number have been validated outside of the US,compromising our understanding about dating violence experiences inother countries This study examined the psychometric characteristics of the RevisedIntimate Partner Violence Attitude Scale (R-IPVS, Smith et al., 2005)

Revised-Attitudes toward IntimatePartner Violence The Intimate Partner Violence Attitude Scales (IPVAS) was developedby Smith, Thompson, Tomaka, & Buchanan (2005) Revised by Fincham, Cui, Braithwaite, & Pasley (2008) Provides an independent assessment of the attitudes held by theparticipants toward violence in intimate relationships Likert scale that ranges from one (strongly disagree) to 4 (stronglyagree). Higher scores indicate a more a favorable attitude toward datingviolence behaviors, while lower scores indicate a more unfavorableattitude toward IPV behaviors Time of administration ranges from five to ten minutes

Revised-Attitudes toward IntimatePartner Violence Contains three scales (17 items): abuse, control, & violence Abuse (8): related to the acceptability of experiencing or exhibiting both verbaland nonverbal abuse behavior As long as my partner doesn’t hurt me, “threats” are excused. During a heated argument, it is okay for me to bring up something from my partner’spast to hurt him or her. I think it helps our relationship for me to make my partner jealous. I don’t mind my partner doing something just to make me jealous. During a heated argument, it is okay for me to say something just to hurt my partneron purpose. It is no big deal if my partner insults me in front of others. It is okay for me to accept blame for my partner doing bad things. It is okay for me to blame my partner when I do bad things.

Revised-Attitudes toward IntimatePartner Violence Control (5): attitudes about social control and monitoring a partner'sbehaviors I would never try to keep my partner from doing things with other people. I would be flattered if my partner told me not to talk to someone of the other sex. I would not stay with a partner who tried to keep me from doing things with otherpeople. It is okay for me to tell my partner not to talk to someone of the opposite sex. I would not like for my partner to ask me what I did every minute of the day.Violence (4): physical violence in terms of attitudes about direct physicalabuse and threats of physical abuse It would never be appropriate to hit or try to hit one’s partner with an object. It would not be appropriate to ever kick, bite, or hit a partner with one’s fist. Threatening a partner with a knife or gun is never appropriate. I think it is wrong to ever damage anything that belongs to a partner.

Revised-Attitudes toward IntimatePartner Violence The R-IPVAS has predominant use of gender-inclusive terminology withrespect to identification of a relationship It has consistently been used to assess attitudes toward IPV amongHispanics populations. Empirical evidence of strong reliability and validity. Internal consistency suggests that the three scales of the IPVAS haveshowed good reliability in different populations, including Hispaniccollege students, with alpha coefficients above .69 (Blasko, 2008;Hernandez, 2012; Smith et al., 2005). Strong content, construct, and predictive validity among differentsamples (Beas, 2009; Blasko, 2008; Camacho, 2009; Fincham et al., 2008;Frasier, 2010; Hernandez, 2012; McMullen, 2011; Smith et al., 2005).

MethodsSample and Setting Data from a larger mixed methodstudy exploring the influence ofsocio cultural factors on theattitudes toward intimate partnerviolenceUniversity of Costa Rica, CentralAmericaConvenience sample of 249undergraduate students at theUCR currently enrolled in at least onecourse at the UCRself-identify as Costa Ricanbetween 18 and 26 years oldhave lived in another country for 6 months (exclusion)Recruited through multiplestrategiesProcedures UM and UCR IRB approvalS-CAB (n 6) ofundergraduate studentsOnline survey QualtricsData analysis Confirmatory factoranalysis Assumptions for CFA Correlations subscalesubscale Internal consistency

Demographic Characteristics N 249, 21.7 2.3 years Women (63.45%, n 158), Men (36.15%, n 90) Heterosexual (82.3%, n 205) Full-time students (77.1%, n 192) Single (95.6%, n 238), currently in a romantic relationship (52.2%, n 130) Living with their parents and/or family (70.3%, n 175) Catholic (49%, n 122) School year First year (13.3%, n 33), second year (18.5%, n 46), third year (21.3%, n 53), fourth year (21.7%, n 54),fifth year (18.9%, n 47), sixth year or higher (3.2%,n 8)Degree sought Health-related degree (55.8%, n 139), engineering (18.5%, n 46), social sciences (16.9%, n 42), arts andletters (5.2%, n 13), basic sciences (2%, n 5), and agriculture and agri-food (.8%, n 2)

Model FitFit Indices for Factor Model of the Note: X2 chi square goodness of fit statistic; df degree of freedom;RMSEA Root-Mean-Square Error of Approximation; *Indicates X2 are statistically significant (p .004)**Probability RMSEA .744Reliability Total scale α .71 (17 items) Control subscale α .68 (5 items) Abuse subscale α .63 (8 items) Violence subscale α .50 (4 items)

Confirmatory factor analysis of the ntrol.32***All values are significant at p .05 level.7712.38

Discussion These results indicate that the Costa Rican version of theR-IPVAS has a variety of potential applications and can berecommended for use in research and practice Confirmation of the relevance of a three-factorintercorrelated model of attitudes toward dating violenceamong college students highlights the value of consideringmultiple behaviors during dating violence assessment Limitations Self-report measure of attitudes toward dating violence Findings address only the structure underlying the R-IPVAS ratherthan the nature of dating violence attitudes

Implications This study adds to the literature by being the first to examine the internalstructure of the R-IPVAS in a sample of college students in Costa Rica. Therefore, this study addresses the lack of knowledge in Costa Rica aboutattitudes toward dating violence among young adults This information is crucial for researchers, policymakers, and clinicians asthey work to construct programs and policies to prevent and address datingviolence Further research to understand the complex and unique experiences of datingviolence in Costa Rica Results and the R-IPVAS may be used as a foundation Nursing knowledge Nursing practice Nursing participation in policy

Funding This research was funded by the Sigma Theta Tau, Beta Tau Chapter,University of Miami, Dissertation Research Grant (Chair: Dr. Gonzalez-Guarda)and the University of Costa Rica.Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s),which may have inappropriately influenced them in presenting this information

University of Costa Rica School of Nursing Contact information: Derby Munoz-Rojas, PhD, MSN, BSN, derby.munoz@ucr.ac.cr University of Costa Rica, School of Nursing San Jose, Costa Rica

Psychometric characteristics of the Revised Attitudes toward Intimate Partner Violence Scale among College students in Costa Rica Derby Munoz-Rojasa, Brian E. McCabeb, & Rosa Gonzalez-Guardab a University of Costa Rica, School of Nursing b University of Miami, School of Nursing and Health Studies

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Student Training Manual/Workbook . 5 Law Enforcement/Criminal Justice Use Only Revised 5/23/2016 Revised By: Revised Date: Revised By: Revised Date: Revised By: Revised Date: Revised By: Revised Date: Revised By: Revised Date: Revised By: Revised Date: Revised By: Revised Date: Marie Jernigan Supervisor Training Unit SBI Criminal Information and Identification Section May 23, 2016 Jeannie .

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.