U. S. NAVAL OBSERVATORY Washington, DC 20392-5420

2y ago
55 Views
5 Downloads
222.54 KB
27 Pages
Last View : 21d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Randy Pettway
Transcription

1U. S. NAVAL OBSERVATORYWashington, DC 20392-5420This report covers the period July 2003 through June2004.I. PERSONNELA. PersonnelIn June 2004 Captain David Gillard was relieved by Captain Fredrick Tettelbach as Superintendent of the U.S. NavalObservatory. QMC共SS兲 Barry Wass, USN, left the Astronomical Applications 共AA兲 Department and retired from theNavy effective 30 September. QMC共SW兲 Blake Myers,USN, replaced him on 17 November. Steven Dick leftUSNO to take the position of Chief Historian at NASA effective 3 November. Sean Urban joined the AA Departmentas Chief of the Nautical Almanac Office effective 13 June.Ann C. Bascom, Blair C. Fonville, and Eric Newmanjoined the Time Service 共TS兲 Department. Jim De Young,Nicolette Jardine, Lisa Nelson Moreau, Lara Schmidt, andKen Senior departed TS. Mihran Miranian retired as head ofthe Time Transfer Division in April after more than 40 yearsof service. Mark Lee joined the Earth Orientation 共EO兲 Department in February 2004, replacing Jim Rohde who left totake a position at NOAA.On 21 May Norbert Zacharias became acting chief of theCataloging and Requirements Division of the AstrometryDepartment 共AD兲, replacing S. Urban. Trudy Tilleman wastransferred from the AD to the Flagstaff Station 共NOFS兲.Valeri Makarov left the Astrometry Department to take aposition at the Michelson Science Center 共California Instituteof Technology兲, and Dominic Marcello left to pursue graduate studies. Mel Dyck retired from the Flagstaff Station,NPOI division. Bob Zavala joined the NPOI division andChristian Hummel left for a position at the ESO in Chile.Marie Jones retired from the Resources Management共RM兲 Department. Andrew Lott and Daniel Horne joined theRM Department.B. Summer StudentsThe USNO summer intern program for high school andcollege students continued in 2003. Most of the students aresupported through the Science and Engineering ApprenticeProgram 共SEAP兲, sponsored by the Department of Defense共DoD兲 and administered by George Washington University.During the summer of 2003, the 10 interns and the departments in which they worked were: Joel Bergstein 共AA兲,Brian Brett 共TS兲, Andrew Cenko 共AD兲, Laura Flagg 共AD兲,Tracy Klayton 共AD兲, Eric Liang 共Library兲, Andrei Munteanu共AA兲, David Price 共EO兲, Paul Ries 共EO兲, and Sabrina Snell共AA兲. In addition, Steven Movit worked at USNO 共in AD兲 aspart of the Naval Research Enterprise Intern Program. Thesummer intern program coordinators were G. Kaplan 共AA兲and M. S. Carter 共EO兲. At the end of the reporting period,USNO was preparing to host 12 students during the summerof 2004.During the summer of 2004, S. Levine 共NOFS兲 hosted A.Krupicka 共Colorado Coll.兲 at USNO Flagstaff, under the auspices of the NSF Research Experience for ��AA DEPARTMENTThe department continued to perform its core mission ofproviding practical astronomical information and data viaprinted publications, software products, and the World WideWeb. J. Bangert continued to serve as department head.A Science Support Division was organized within the department in January, to provide scientific and technical studies and applied research necessary to keep the almanacs andoperational software products scientifically current and accurate, and to meet anticipated future requirements. Divisionstaff is M. Efroimsky, J. Hilton, and M. Murison, supervisedby G. Kaplan.A. Almanacs and Other PublicationsThe Nautical Almanac Office 共NAO兲 is responsible forthe printed publications of the department 共see .html兲.TheNAO works in close collaboration with Her Majestys Nautical Almanac Office 共HMNAO兲 of the United Kingdomto produce The Astronomical Almanac, The Astronomical Almanac Online, The Nautical Almanac, and The Air Almanac.Following the retirement of S. Howard in May 2003, Kaplan,S. Dick, and R. Miller served successive terms as ActingChief of the NAO. An extensive search was conducted, andS. Urban 共formerly of USNO’s Astrometry Department兲 accepted the position on a permanent basis, effective 13 June2004.During the reporting period, the almanacs for 2005 andThe Air Almanac for 2006 were published. Dick, Miller, S.Stewart, and M. Stollberg participated in the production ofthese annual publications, with additional guidance providedby Kaplan and Bangert. Stewart coordinated the necessaryupdates to The Astronomical Almanac Online. Stollbergmodified the code used for Section F 共Satellites兲 followingconsultation with HMNAO. Additionally, he continued development of an IDL-based application that provides plots ofthe apparent orbits of selected planetary satellites as a possible future Web service. Efroimsky and Kaplan revisedmany of the entries in the Glossary 共Section M兲 of the 2005Astronomical Almanac. M. Lukac 共retired USNO兲 assisted inthe production of The Air Almanac.At the end of the reporting period, the next editions of thepublications were in preparation and on schedule. Extensivechanges are being made to the 2006 Astronomical Almanac,mostly due to the incorporation of the 1997 and 2000 International Astronomical Union 共IAU兲 resolutions with regardto reference frames, timescales, precession, and nutation.These changes affect virtually every section of the almanac

2ANNUAL REPORTand required extensive development and integration of newsoftware. Stewart, with guidance from Kaplan, was mainlyresponsible for maintaining and tracking the incorporation ofthe new software into the production pipeline. Miller, Stollberg, Stewart, Kaplan, Hilton, Bangert, and Urban assistedHMNAO in editing Section B 共Time Scales and CoordinateSystems兲, the section that will change the most due to theIAU resolutions.Miller, with some guidance from Kaplan, updated the AirAlmanac examples to use data from current epochs. Millerproduced a revised prototype CD-ROM version of the entire2005 Air Almanac; copies were distributed to selected usersfor review.Production problems at the U. S. Government PrintingOffice 共GPO兲 continued. For example, the 2004 Astronomical Almanac was completely sold out by the second week ofJanuary 2004. For reasons such as this 共and others兲, theUSNO formally requested a waiver of the legal requirementthat GPO print the almanacs. In April, Bangert was notifiedthat the request for the waiver would not be granted. However, as a result of the waiver request, GPO agreed to lowerthe price of the 2005 Astronomical Almanac to 40.00 共from 55.00兲, to implement a marketing plan for the book, and toensure ready availability of the book by ordering a sufficientsupply and using print-on-demand technology.Howard resigned as co-editor of the Explanatory Supplement to The Astronomical Almanac, which is currently beingupdated and revised. Urban was named her successor. P. K.Seidelmann 共U. of Virginia兲 served as lead editor, withBangert and Urban completing the editorial team. Hilton,Murison, and Stewart worked on chapters for the book.The NAO still receives written requests for special astronomical data tables, although data provided through the departments Web site 共see below兲 have greatly decreased thenumber of such requests. QMC Wass and Y. Hines handledmany of these requests.B. Software ProductsThe Software Products Division, headed by N. Oliversen,is responsible for the department’s software products andWeb sites. During the reporting period, the division’s effortswere focused on a major upgrade of the MICA 共the Multiyear Interactive Computer Almanac兲 software. MICA is anexecutable application program that provides high-precisionastronomical data in tabular form. MICA 1.5—the currentversion—is valid for the time interval 1990-2005, and isavailable in editions for PCs 共a DOS application that runsunder Windows兲 and Apple Macintosh computers.Willmann-Bell, Inc. 共http://www.willbell.com/兲 distributesMICA for USNO.Design and development work continued on MICA 2.0,which will be a major upgrade of the program. The newversion will feature a revamped user interface, several important new capabilities, and a greatly expanded time interval 共1800-2050兲. The PC edition will be a true Windowsapplication, and the Macintosh edition will operate underboth Mac OS 9 and X. Work this year concentrated on development and incorporation of several astrometric catalogs,a new position type 共topocentric local hour angle and decli-nation兲, the location manager software that handles the observers location共s兲, the help facility, and the PC installationsoftware. Extensive verification tests of both editions wereunderway at the end of the reporting period, with formal betatesting having started in May 2004. The MICA 2.0 development team includes W. Tangren, W. Harris, W. Puatua, andOliversen.C. Positional and Dynamical Astronomy1. Solar System DynamicsEfroimsky continued his work on gauge functions in celestial mechanics. As an application, he has been working onan analytic development of the very long-term evolution ofsatellite orbits about precessing oblate planets, especiallyMars. The object is to develop an independent check of thedirect 共but very model-dependent兲 numerical studies of Marsobliquity history. Efroimsky’s work is described in two published papers, with one more submitted and two more inpreparation.At the end of the reporting period, Efroimsky had alsobegun a study of the analytical development of rigid-Earthrotation as affected by lunisolar and planetary torques. Suchdevelopments form the basis for the algorithm for nutationcurrently used in the analysis of high-precision Earth orientation observations. He has found that the currently usedtheories appear to contain a well-concealed flaw, the correction of which will almost certainly have important practicalresults.Hilton was named co-investigator of a NASA grant onasteroids. His specific responsibilities are to 共1兲 study theaccuracy of asteroid ephemerides and determine the effect ofunmodeled perturbations from other asteroids; and 共2兲 makedeterminations of the masses of some of the larger asteroids.Murison continued working with a District of Columbiahigh school student, A. Munteanu, on the minimum distancebetween two bodies orbiting a common center in independent Keplerian ellipses. This problem, of great practicalvalue, has turned out to be unexpectedly thorny. For hiswork on this topic, Munteanu was awarded 9th place nationally in the 2004 Intel Science Talent Search.Hilton developed an algorithm to replace the lunar librations used in The Astronomical Almanac, based on a 1981Eckhardt theory, with librations derived from the lunar rotation angles in the Jet Propulsion Laboratory 共JPL兲 LE405lunar ephemeris.Efroimsky, Hilton, and Murison gave talks on their workat the annual meeting of the American Astronomical Society共AAS兲 Division on Dynamical Astronomy 共DDA兲, held inCannes, France, in April.2. Positional AstronomyHilton and Hohenkerk 共HMNAO兲 completed a development of the matrix transformation between the dynamicalequator and equinox of J2000.0 and the International Celestial Reference System 共ICRS兲. Their work was published inJanuary.Kaplan completed an advanced beta release of the nextFORTRAN version of the Naval Observatory Vector As-

U.S. NAVAL OBSERVATORYtrometry Subroutines 共NOVAS兲. This version implementsthe IAU resolutions of 1997 and 2000 on fundamental astronomy. Output from this package was compared with thatfrom independent code, based on different algorithms, usedat HMNAO; the results were in excellent agreement. Thenew NOVAS release was used in the preparation of theUSNO sections of the 2006 Astronomical Almanac. Kaplanalso began writing a USNO Circular describing the recentIAU resolutions and their implementation.Kaplan continues to collaborate with V. Makarov 共JPL兲on the possibilities for astrometric detection of unseen companions to apparently single stars, using various kinds ofdiscrepancies in proper motion measurements. A paper onthis subject was in advanced draft form at the end of thereporting period.Bangert, Kaplan, Hilton, Urban, and Dick attended theIAU General Assembly in July 2003 in Sydney, Australia.Bangert and Kaplan gave presentations within Division 1meetings on the implementation, in USNO products, of theIAU resolutions passed in 1997 and 2000 on fundamentalastronomy 共specifically regarding astronomical referencesystems and Earth rotation models兲. Hilton gave a presentation on precession theories. Hilton was appointed chair of thenew IAU Working Group on Precession and the Ecliptic, andKaplan was appointed a member of the new IAU WorkingGroup on Nomenclature for Fundamental Astronomy. Bothworking groups were quite active in the year following theGeneral Assembly. Hilton’s working group made significantprogress towards recommending a dynamically valid precession theory for general astronomical use. Hilton also continues to serve on the IAU Working Group on CartographicCoordinates and Rotational Elements of the Planets and Satellites, and is currently assisting in the production of theworking group’s next report. Urban served as chairman ofthe Densification of the Optical Reference Frame workinggroup under Commission 8.Puatua continued working with A. Fey and D. Boboltz共AD兲, analyzing VLA Pie Town observations of galacticradio stars to determine their precise positions and propermotions in the ICRS. The approximately 50 radio stars inthis data set were chosen because they are visible in both theradio and optical, thus providing a connection between thetwo frames.3. Celestial NavigationBangert, Kaplan, Urban, and T. Rafferty 共AD兲 continuedtheir collaboration with staff at the Space and Naval WarfareSystems Center — San Diego on development of an automated celestial navigation system 共ACNS兲. Two contractors,one working in the red portion of the spectrum 共Microcosm,Inc., funded by the Air Force Research Laboratory兲 and theother in the near-infrared 共Trex Enterprises Corp., funded bythe Office of Naval Research兲, began design and fabricationwork for prototype devices to observe stars day and nightfrom a fixed location and obtain a geographic position fromthe observations. Both contractors’ work is being performedas Small Business Innovative Research 共SBIR兲 projects.3USNO is providing technical guidance, its STELLA celestialnavigation software, and special star catalogs tailored for theACNS sensors.D. World Wide Web SiteThe AA department’s public Web site 共http://aa.usno.navy.mil/兲 continued to grow in popularity. The sitehandled from 15,000 to over 25,000 user sessions per dayduring the reporting period. This is an average increase ofabout 10% compared to the previous year.Everyone on the scientific staff contributed content andsupport to the Web sites. Puatua created a new data serviceto calculate the local circumstances of the 8 June 2004 transitof Venus, utilizing the MICA 2.0 computational engine.Many other Web pages underwent minor updates. Tangrenmaintained the Web servers. Department staff continued toanswer questions related to the departments mission, submitted by e-mail from Web site users. Several questions per daywere received, on average, and response time was typicallyone or two workdays.E. Other Research and ActivitiesHilton completed an analysis of the published magnitudesof Mercury and Venus as a function of phase angle, for usein the magnitude predictions in The Astronomical Almanac.At the end of the reporting period, a paper on this topic wasin advanced draft.Both Efroimsky and Murison have been actively involvedin the dispersed Fourier Transform Spectrometer 共dFTS兲project 共see Astrometry Department report兲. Both have takenobservations with the instrument, which is mounted on atelescope near Boston, MA but can be remotely operated.The dFTS is yielding high-quality stellar spectra and increasingly precise radial velocities. Efroimsky has been studyingthe application of the second-order Doppler shift to the veryhigh-precision radial velocity measurements that the dFTSmay be able to provide. Murison has been involved in theoptical design, and especially in the construction and testingof an adaptive optics front-end.Murison continues his duties as Secretary of the Divisionon Dynamical Astronomy 共DDA兲 and was active in helpingto organize the annual DDA meeting in Cannes. Hiltonserves on the Committee of the DDA.Hilton organized a special session at the spring 2004 AASmeeting in Denver on the IAU resolutions of 1997 and 2000on fundamental astronomy. At the end of the reporting period he was organizing a working group within the DDA onthis topic.Bangert continued to serve on the IAUs Standards forFundamental Astronomy 共SOFA兲 Review Board 共http://www.starlink.rl.ac.uk/ sofa/兲.III. TIME SERVICE „TS DEPARTMENTA. Master Clock OperationsL. Breakiron maintained the Bldg. 52 and 78 mean timescales based on data taken with the Timing Solutions Corp.

4ANNUAL REPORT共TSC兲 clock measurement systems. He also continued hisresearch on Kalman filter timescales toward real-timeimplementation.D. Johns completed rewriting the timescale programs inthe C language. He set up P. Koppangs steering algorithmson four Auxiliary Output Generators. Many additional plotsfeaturing timescale, time transfer, and environmental datawere added to the Rom Web site.B. Global Positioning System „GPS OperationsBreakiron took over as alternate monitor of GPS operations to F. Vannicola following the departure of L. NelsonMoreau. He wrote an operations duty manual and programmed the data collections from the carrier-phase receivers known as USN1 and AMC1 at the Observatory and theAlternate Master Clock 共AMC兲 site respectively.H. Chadsey worked with the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division, to test various versions of a specialpurpose GPS-steered frequency standard. He designed andimplemented a test facility for general-purpose frequency,time, and GPS systems testing. This testing is ongoing.Chadsey also worked with J. Brad, D. Matsakis, and E. Powers on the RINEX to CCTF time-code conversion in geodeticGPS receivers.B. Fonville collected data from Trimble GPS receivers. D.Johns, with the assistance of E. Powers and D. McCarthy共Directorate of Time兲, implemented two solid Earth tidemodels at the positions of USNO and the AMC.Powers contributed to the GPS Capabilities DefinitionDocument and worked with the GPS Joint Program Office onimprovements to GPS time steering and to USNO measurements of GPS time bias. He handled interoperability issuesbetween GPS and Japan’s QZSS system; contributed to anew GPS navigation message; and worked with the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and KW Microwave, Inc. on a new design for GPS antenna electronics. He conducted experimentsinvolving a GPS simulator and carrier-phase receivers; tookpart in a GPS III time improvement effort and in writingspecifications for a GPS III Digital Satellite Simulator; andparticipated in the development of a new Navigation andTime System for future Navy ships.Vannicola managed the Precise Positioning Service 共PPS兲and Standard Positioning Service 共SPS兲 receivers, associatedhardware, and reduction software. Under the control of theTime Transfer Division were four Allen Osborne Associates,Inc. 共AOA兲 TTR-12 PPS receivers, two STel 5401C PPSreceivers, two Motorola Oncore SPS receivers, one R100GPS/GLONASS receiver, and one AOA TTR-6 SPS receiver. Two STel 5401C receivers were shutdown in Marchand April 2004 and one AOA TTR-6 receiver in December2003. One AOA TTR-12 PPS receiver and one MotorolaOncore SPS receiver were in operation at the AMC site. TheAMC TTR-12 was returned to USNO in September 2003due to persistent tracking anomalies and replaced with aspare unit from USNO. The original AMC TTR-12 has beenoperating at USNO without any problems and with no hardware or software modifications.The GPS Master Control Station 共MCS兲 of the Air Forces2nd Satellite Operations Squadron 共2SOPS兲 performed suc-cessful daily downloads of the USNO GPS PPS timing datafor GPS Time synchronization to UTC 共USNO兲. The GPStimescale was maintained to within 15 nanoseconds 共ns兲 ofUTC 共USNO兲 共its specification is 1 microsecond兲 and theyearly average error of UTC transmitted from GPS was 4.29ns. Vannicola worked with Johns and GPS MCS contractorsto set up testing of USNO data files for future transfers viathe Secret Internet Protocol Router Network 共SIPRNet兲 tothe GPS MCS.Vannicola computed the new calibration value 共L1 only兲for the operational USNO SPS GPS receiver to bring it inline with the operational USNO PPS GPS receiver. The newvalue was inserted on 2 April 2004 at 0000 UT and theBureau International des Poids et Mesures 共BIPM兲 was notified. All backup SPS receivers were also adjusted appropriately.Vannicola implemented a series of alarm monitors forGPS data monitoring, values out of range, SIPRNet connectivity, and L2 interference; monitored the daily GPS MCS2SOPS downloads of USNO data for GPS Time synchronization; performed the necessary Communications Security共COMSEC兲 duties required to sustain the USNO GPS PPStiming operations; modified associated software; and replaced the receiver-dependent USNO vs. AMC GPS PPScommon-view data files with continuous operational files.For redundancy and robustness, Vannicola redistributedthe GPS PPS operations equipment to balance the primaryand backup systems on the two uninterruptible power systemsources in Bldg. 78, Rm. 123 and set up GPS PPS datareduction and processes on a second HP-UX computer system 共‘‘Hypatia2’’兲 as a hot backup to the primary system共‘‘Hypatia’’兲.Vannicola monitored the reduction of the NovAtel GPSand WAAS receiver and common-view data and assisted introubleshooting the failure of the receiver in April 2004.With Powers and Brad, she worked with AOA on the development of their PTTR-12CS Selective Availability/Antispoofing Module 共SAASM兲 receiver.Vannicola provided support to the National GeospatialIntelligence Agency in troubleshooting their GPS PPS receivers located at USNO, as well as COMSEC receiver keying. She also provided USNO GPS Timing Operationsreports to the Civil GPS Service Information Committee attheir September 2003 and March 2004 meetings.C. Loran-C OperationsUSNO signed a Memorandum of Understanding with theU.S. Coast Guard Engineering group at Wildwood, NJ. Thisventure will put USNO into the Enhanced Loran system as akey reference point. Chadsey continued monitoring Lorantiming. He gave a course to Coast Guard personnel onclocks, timing, and reference frames.D. WideOperationsAreaAugmentationSystem„WAAS Chadsey monitored the timing data from the FAA’sWAAS.

U.S. NAVAL OBSERVATORYE. Computer OperationsJ. Eler installed, maintained, and repaired all the LANcabling. Johns set up USNO/AMC SIPRNet e-mail PCs withassistance from T. Hannus and A. Koppas, both of the Information Technology Department. He also evaluated and setup two Web-based e-mail solutions in the event the Exchange Server is no longer available.W. King developed a comprehensive Web-based interfacefor monitoring and control of TWSTT operations which isused by the staff to bring new sites on line, adjust calibrationand measurement values, plot data, monitor status, and update event logs. She developed two LINUX PCs to take overthe SATRE modem data collection and processing to providehigh TWSTT availability. She also developed Web-baseddocumentation of the TS instrument LAN and its hosts andall devices, and migrated all the data collection at the AMCfrom the last 68K machine to the new HP-UX instrumentcontrollers and instrument LAN. She developed a LINUXPC with DVD-RW capabilities now used to archive AOATTR-12 GPS receiver data.R. Schmidt upgraded Time Service campus LAN connectivity to 1000-baseTX Ethernet. He installed USNO’s firstFabric-login Fibrechannel-switched storage area network, installed HP ServiceGuard high-availability clustering software, and began testing campus fiber-optic connectivity.Schmidt installed the Mysql version 4 relational database fortimescale and environmental data mining.F. Alternate Master Clock „AMC OperationsBreakiron maintained the operational AMC mean timescale until J. Skinner took it over in January. Breakiron alsomaintained the mean timescale based on TSC clock data.Skinner continued to provide BIPM with USNO and AMCclock data. Fonville installed and tested a new TWSTT antenna, modem, and cabling.G. Two-WayOperationsSatelliteTimeTransfer„TWSTT Breakiron monitored the data accuracy and integrity ofthe TWSTT operational exchanges with 11 other timinglaboratories, programming adaptive filters that detected outliers and warned of excursions. He began a study of TWSTTcalibration errors.Fonville modeled a TWSTT carrier-phase system, deviseda configuration using dual-loop back, and wrote software toprocess data from SATRE TWSTT modems operating incarrier-phase mode. He determined the temperature sensitivity of SATRE modems and Ortel fiber-optic controller modules and conducted a noise analysis of an Anacomtransceiver.A. McKinley, A. Smith, and E. Newman handled TWSTToperations; upgraded and calibrated the TWSTT stations inBahrain, Germany, and Michigan; calibrated the TWSTTstations at the AMC, NIST, Timing Solutions Corporation,and Vandenberg AFB; and changed the frequencies of all theTWSTT sites using the AMC3 satellite. McKinley restoredthe transatlantic TWSTT link during the satellite changefrom Intelsat 706 to Intelsat 903; worked with TimeTech5GmbH on the software for, and testing of, the new SATREmodems; and repaired the modem at the Midway station.McKinley and Newman maintained, repaired, and upgradedthe USNO TWSTT antenna. McKinley and Smith upgradedthe TWSTT software at the Michigan and Vandenberg stations. McKinley and P. Wheeler calibrated the Midway station. Smith upgraded the TWSTT equipment in Bldg. 52 andVandenberg. Newman and G. Luther maintained USNOsTWSTT cabling and calibration equipment.Powers worked with Johns and McCarthy on improvedtropospheric modeling for TWSTT operations.H. Network Timing Protocol „NTP OperationsSchmidt, with assistance from Johns, continued to providenationwide NTP support. The demand for this service continues to expand. Incoming NTP traffic reached a record5,000 packets/second in Washington, DC, with an additional700/second at remote NTP sites. Schmidt migrated the current NTP server to version 4.2.0, providing enhanced security and ability to provide cryptographic authentication.Eleven HP A500 servers were integrated with PCI time andfrequency processors and Motorola UT GPS receivers.These were deployed to USNO NTP host sites at Fairbanks,AK, Palo Alto, CA, Pasadena, CA, Colorado Springs, CO,Gainesville, FL, Maui, HI, Waterville, ME, New York City,NY, Columbus, OH, Houston, TX, and Seattle, WA.Schmidt installed and tested NTP development version4.1.74, and production versions 4.1.80-rc1, and 4.2.0 onHP-UX 11i platforms.Schmidt proposed a new SAASM GPS NTP server for theDISA SIPRNet. The USNO NTP SIPRNet was upgradedfrom 128 kbps to 1.54 Mbps. He provided documentation toSpace and Naval Warfare Systems Command supporting retention of NTP time service on the Non-secure Internet Protocol Router Network. He worked with Mitre Corporation onrefinements to their National Air Force time synchronizationnetwork.I. Systems EngineeringFonville developed software for the control of a StanfordTime Interval Counter. Smith maintained and repaired all theenvironmental chambers in Bldgs. 52 and 78.M. Tran worked with PSI, Inc. to design and develop theoutdoor temperature control chambers that are now in use tostabilize the temperature of TWSTT transceivers, the controlof which has improved significantly since the chambers wereinstalled on the roof of Bldg. 78. Tran also designed anddeveloped new alarm systems for Bldgs. 78 and 52 thatmonitor chamber temperatures and critical equipment. Thesystem is able to call, page, and e-mail each individual whois assigned to a specific day and time.Tran upgraded programs based on Visual C for allSATRE modems that control TWSTT automatically, i.e. theup/down converter frequency and data collection. The program allows editing of the schedule times, PN code, up/downfrequency, and satellite positions. He also developed a plotting program based on PC labView to perform TWSTT andTSC data analysis and file manipulation.

6ANNUAL REPORTTran maintained the TSC hardware and software in Bldgs.52 and 78. He redesigned the control software based on GUIVisual C for greater flexibility, reliability, and userfriendliness. He performed periodic Master Clock #2 and #3calibrations and, with A. Kubik, monitored and maintainedthe performance of the Digital Acquisition System clockmeasurement system equipment. He also designed and developed many GPS split amplifiers that have been installed.J. Clock DevelopmentT. Swanson continued to work with JPL on the mercuryion trap standard. Attempts to remove drift and signal lossare underway. S. Crane, S. Peil, Swanson, and C. Ekstromcontinued work on a rubidium fountain. The magneticshields, optical systems, and control systems are in place.The group presented its work on the fountain and opticalfrequency doubling at the IEEE Frequency Control Symposium. Koppang and Ekstrom authored a paper on threecornered-hat analysis of clock stability that will appear in theTransactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and FrequencyControl 共UFFC兲.The USNO Astrometry Department Instrument Shop continues manufacturing parts for the atomic fountain clock.Several types of materials were tried for the detection blockand its window cells. The titanium and sapphire windowcombination seemed to work.K. MiscellaneousBreakiron served as chairman of the USNO Editorial Review Board and as treasurer and editorial chairman of thePrecise Time and Time Interval 共PTTI兲 Systems and Applications Meeting Executive Committee. He edited the previous Observatory Report; edited, published on CD-ROM, anddistributed the PTTI Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting; and posted the PTTI papers on the USNO We

cal Almanac Office HMNAO of the United Kingdom to produce The Astronomical Almanac, The Astronomical Al-manac Online, The Nautical Almanac, and The Air Almanac. Following the retirement of S. Howard in May 2003, Kaplan, S. Dick, and R. Miller served successive terms as Acting Chief of the NAO. An extensive search was conducted, and

Related Documents:

redstone test center . white sands test center . yuma proving ground . naval air warfare center aircraft division patuxent river . naval air warfare center weapons division china lake . naval air warfare center weapons division point mugu . naval surface warfare center dahlgren division . naval undersea warfare center division keyport . naval .

NDP 1, Naval Warfare, describes the ways naval forces accomplish their missions and execute their roles with joint and multinational teams; Naval Logistics explains how the support for those operations is planned, acquired, and integrated into the operations of naval expedi-tionary fo

Air Almanac 2016 393 United States. Naval Observatory; United States. Naval Obeservatory.; Nautical Almanac Office Nautical almanacs--Periodicals 2015 CD: 3060 Book/CD ok 1 (8/2015) D213.7:2017/CD Air Almanac 2017 393: United States Naval Observatory. Nautical Almanac Office Nautical almanacs--Periodicals 2016 CD 3162: Book/CD ok 1 (7/2016) Y 4 .

Jan 07, 2011 · Naval Campaigns User Manual . Introduction . Naval Campaignsis a series of games covering modern naval actions including actions such as the World War I naval battle of Jutland. Each game consists of a series of scenarios based on the historical battle with hypothetical scenarios as well.

E3 & Spectrum Support Commands Acquisition Support and Test Facilities NAVAIR- Naval Air Systems Command Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Lakehurst New Jersey, Patuxent River Maryland. Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China Lake & Point Mugu California NAVSEA-Naval Sea Systems Command Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren Division (NSWCDD)

The purpose of naval doctrine is to enhance the operational effectiveness of US naval1 forces. Naval doctrine represents the fundamental principles by which the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard or elements thereof guide their actions in support of national objectives. It is authoritative but requires judgment in application. NDP 1, Naval

Publishing is a powerful tool for amateur radio astronomy. 2. Spectroscope, v 2.9.0 This software allows you to view signals from special frequency-sweeping receivers at the Windward Community College Radio Observatory (WCCRO) and the University of Florida Radio Observatory (UFRO) and from many volunteer radio astronomers. These receivers, called

Firstly the slide back roof shed. These are generally the cheapest type of observatory on the market. Although you can modify your own shed you can pick up customised sheds (7’x7’) for around 700. However, the footprint of this type of observatory when the roof is p