Post 2025 Market Design Consultation Paper

3y ago
41 Views
6 Downloads
3.69 MB
128 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nadine Tse
Transcription

ENERGY SECURITY BOARDPost 2025 Market DesignConsultation PaperSeptember 20201

Dr Kerry Schott AOIndependent ChairEnergy Security BoardDavid SwiftIndependent Deputy ChairEnergy Security BoardClare SavageChairAustralian Energy RegulatorMerryn YorkChair (Acting)Australian Energy Market CommissionAudrey ZibelmanCEO and Managing DirectorAustralian Energy Market Operator2

CONTENTSCONTENTS . 3EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 71.2.3.4.5.6.7.INTRODUCTION. 131.1.Background . 131.2.Consultation and submissions . 14THE EXISTING NEM DESIGN AND ITS CHALLENGES . 152.1.Meeting consumer needs . 162.2.Managing variability and uncertainty . 182.3.Need for capital replacement . 192.4.Need to value demand flexibility and integrate DER . 22MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVES . 263.1.Development of market design initiatives . 263.2.Transition period . 273.3.Relationship to other initiatives . 28RESOURCE ADEQUACY MECHANISMS – MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVE A. 294.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 294.2.What are the options considered? . 364.3.Which options are proposed for further development and consideration? . 444.4.Questions for consultation . 46AGEING THERMAL GENERATION STRATEGY – MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVE B . 475.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 475.2.What are the options for addressing these risks? . 545.3.What are we proposing to do next? . 585.4.Questions for stakeholders . 58ESSENTIAL SYSTEM SERVICES – MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVE C . 596.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 596.2.What are the options considered? . 606.3.Which options are proposed for further development and consideration? . 716.4.Regulatory framework changes . 726.5.Questions for stakeholders . 73SCHEDULING AND AHEAD MECHANISMS – MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVE D . 747.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 747.2.What are the options considered? . 793

8.9.7.3.Which options are proposed for further development and consideration? . 847.4.Questions for stakeholders . 85TWO-SIDED MARKETS – MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVE E . 868.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 868.2.What are the options considered? . 888.3.Questions for stakeholders . 95VALUING DEMAND FLEXIBILITY AND INTEGRATING DER – MARKET DESIGNINITIATIVE F . 969.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 969.2.What are the options considered? . 989.3.Which options are proposed for further development and consideration? . 1079.4.Questions for stakeholders . 10710. TRANSMISSION ACCESS AND THE COORDINATION OF GENERATION ANDTRANSMISSION – MARKET DESIGN INITIATIVE G. 10810.1.What is the problem this initiative is addressing? . 10810.2.What are the options considered? . 11210.3.Questions for stakeholders . 11511. OVERALL MARKET DESIGN – INTERDEPENDENCIES AND EVALUATION. 11611.1.Interdependencies between initiatives. 11611.2.Evaluation approach . 11712. ENGAGEMENT WITH STAKEHOLDERS . 11912.1.Consultation process and submissions . 120Appendix – Evaluation framework . 121Appendix – Summary of Questions for stakeholders . 125TablesTable 1Table 2Table 3Table 4Table 5Table 6Table 7Post-2025 market design initiatives . 26Factors that can deter investment . 32Operating reserve mechanism. 39Initial consideration of residual risks . 57Ahead mechanism design options. 80Stage One – workstream level assessment criteria . 122Stage Two – reform-wide assessment principles. 1234

FiguresFigure 1Figure 2Figure 3Figure 4Figure 5Figure 6Figure 7Figure 8Figure 9Figure 10Figure 11Figure 12Figure 13Figure 14Figure 15Figure 16Figure 17Figure 18Figure 19Figure 20Figure 21Figure 22Figure 23Figure 24Figure 25Figure 26Figure 27Figure 28Figure 29Figure 30Figure 31Figure 32Figure 33Figure 34Figure 35Figure 36Figure 37Phased market development – a representative example . 11Post-2025 program key deliverables . 14ECA Energy Consumer Sentiment Survey – 'How confident are you that the overallmarket is working in your long-term interests’ (% scoring 7 or higher out of 10). 16Penetration of variable renewable energy resources is increasing . 18Instantaneous penetration of wind and solar generation, actual in 2019 and forecastfor 2025 under ISP Central and Step Change generation build scenarios . 19Thermal synchronous generation exiting the NEM . 20Installed wind and solar capacity in the NEM for 2019, with 2025 and 2040 forecastsfrom final 2020 ISP Central and Step Change generation build scenarios . 21Poll of leading debt and equity investors in Australia regarding the challenges facinginvestors in large-scale renewable energy . 22Effect on South Australian operational demand from increasing distributed PVgeneration (10 November 2019) . 23Minimum operational demand projections for South Australia . 24Coal-fired and gas-powered generation retirements . 49Impacts on price and reliability with different numbers of units exiting – stylisedexample . 51Wholesale prices following the exit of Hazelwood Power Station. 52New generation and storage technologies reduce price cycles . 53Relevant reliability measures in the sudden exit scenario . 55procurement options for Essential System Services (with identification of currentprovision mechanisms for services in bold) . 61An illustrative demand curve for an essential system service . 63Initial assessment of market design characteristics of Operating Reserves . 64Percentage of dispatch intervals during which Contingency FCAS prices exceeded 25/MWh, September 2019 to June 2020 . 65Initial assessment of the market design characteristics of frequency control . 67Initial assessment of the market design characteristics of inertia . 68Initial assessment of market design characteristics of system strength . 70A possible roadmap of procurement and scheduling options for essential systemservices . 72Possible checks and balances of regulatory oversight, allowing regulatoryadaptability .73Actual less Residual Demand forecasts (MW) approaching real time for Victoria(2011-20) . 77Actual less Forecast Prices ( MWh) approaching real time for Victoria (2011-20) . 77The Current Directions process and UCS . 81NEM-wide demand by time of day 2019-20 . 87NEM-wide price by time of day (weighted by demand) 2019-20 . 87benefits of participation from price elastic demand and supply . 90Small scale solar installations by size in kW since Jan 2007 . 97Solar PV and battery storage forecast . 98Overview of DER interactions and supporting architecture along the supply chain . 102Installed capacity by year (ISP central scenario) . 109Instances of congestion in the NEM 2013-19. 111Phased market development . 117Overview of Post-2025 program evaluation framework . 1215

LIST OF CMT PASANEMNEONSPPSSASPVRAMsRERTRIT-TRoCoFRROST PASATOUTNSPUCSVPPVREWDRMAustralian Competition and Consumer CommissionAustralian Energy CouncilAustralian Energy Market CommissionAustralian Energy Market OperatorAustralian Energy RegulatorAustralian Renewable Energy Agencycommercial and industrialCouncil of Australian GovernmentsCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research OrganisationDistributed Energy Integration Programdistributed energy resourcesEnergy Adequacy Assessment ProjectionEnergy Consumers AustraliaEnergy Networks AustraliaEnergy Security BoardEssential System ServicesElectricity Statement of Opportunitieselectric vehiclefrequency control ancillary servicesfast frequency responseGigawattinverter based resourcesIntegrated System PlanMarket Design Initiativemarginal loss factorMarket Price CapMedium Term Projected Assessment of System AdequacyNational Electricity MarketNational Electricity ObjectiveNetwork Service ProviderPower System Security Ancillary ServicesPhotovoltaicResource Adequacy MechanismsReliability and Emergency Reserve TraderRegulatory Investment Test – Transmissionrate of change of frequencyRetailer Reliability ObligationShort Term Projected Assessment of System AdequacyTime of UseTransmission Network Service ProviderUnit Commitment for SecurityVirtual Power Plantvariable renewable energyWholesale demand response mechanism6

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYWhy the market design needs to changeThe energy system is changing. New technology and digitalisation are providing new choices andopportunities to customers. At the same time, the rapid uptake of Variable Renewable Energy(VRE) and Distributed Energy Resources (DER) is well underway and the existing ageing thermalgeneration fleet is progressively retiring. The National Electricity Market (NEM) of the future isvery different to that of the past.Similar changes are occurring in many electricity markets across the world. But the rapid paceof change occurring in Australia and the adoption of distributed (rooftop) solar photovoltaic (PV)systems is remarkable. At least 2.2 million households now have solar PV on their rooftops, upfrom 100,000 a decade ago. This means the changes to the NEM design are likely to be amongthe first in the world to meet these needs.All the changes occurring mean that the current set of systems, tools, market arrangements andregulatory frameworks is no longer entirely fit for purpose and able to meet the changing needs ofthe system and customers. To address these matters, the Energy Security Board (ESB) is taskedby the former COAG Energy Council to develop a market design for the NEM that delivers secureand reliable power at least cost to consumers, and accommodates the changes underway andexpected in the future. This paper sets out for consultation a number of potential solutions toidentified problems and opportunities.Overview of workstreams within Post-2025 market design programTo deliver future market designs, the ESB set up seven workstreams to consider the issues anddevelop potential solutions. The initial work has been done by the market bodies the AustralianEnergy Market Commission (AEMC), Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) and AustralianEnergy Regulator (AER) working together with ESB staff. Industry and consumer groups andother stakeholders have been involved and consulted along the way. The outputs from each ofthe individual workstreams have inter-relationships and need to be considered together for acoherent whole design.The seven workstreams are: Resource adequacy mechanisms (RAMs). Ageing thermal generation strategy. Essential system services. Scheduling and ahead mechanisms. Two sided markets. Valuing demand flexibility and integrating DER. Transmission access and the coordination of generation and transmission investment.Resource adequacy mechanisms (RAMs)While the system requirements change over the next 10-15 years, the issue is whether existingmechanisms are sufficient to support the needs of the system, or whether other complementarymeasures are needed. In particular, are existing mechanisms sufficient to support the requirednew investments?7

A complex mix of resources is required to deliver electricity at the lowest overall cost tocustomers. The mix includes energy from thermal and renewable sources, flexible supply anddemand response resources, and energy storage of different types1.Ensuring there is sufficient and timely investment in this mix of resources is critical to delivering asecure, reliable and affordable supply of electricity. If private sector balance sheets are to fundthis significant new investment at least cost, then there will need to be a degree of confidenceover future prices and the role of government in the market.The ESB is considering various options for how investment signals could be improved. First arethose mechanisms that would strengthen the current real-time price signals for investment thatshould then flow through to expectations about future sustained high prices. Second are thosemechanisms that introduce a longer duration price signal for investment, either through aseparate mechanism or through longer duration contracting. The ESB invites views on whether the current resource adequacy mechanisms in the NEMare sufficient to drive investment in the quantity and mix of resources required through thetransition. The ESB is considering the merits of a spectrum of options intended to strengthen signals forinvestment and support the reliability and security needs of the system. Feedback is sought on how governments could best leverage the long term investmentsignals in the NEM to reflect their jurisdictional policy priorities.Ageing thermal generation strategyWith 61% of the existing thermal generation resources in the NEM likely to exit over the next twodecades, it is essential for reliability of supply and affordability of electricity prices that thistransition is efficient, and delivered at least cost to customers.Uncertainty around the timing of exit of ageing thermal generators could have a significant impacton the affordability of electricity. This uncertainty could result in replacement capacity beingdelayed or new investments requiring a higher return on capital. This could lead to higherelectricity prices. This uncertainty is also reflected in the level of transmission investment requiredunder the Integrated System Plan (ISP).Premature exit of ageing thermal generation can also increase the risk to security, reliability andaffordability of electricity supply, as replacement capacity may not be available to ensureresource adequacy and electricity prices may be higher than necessary, allowing existinggeneration to attract additional rents.There are a number of measures that would reduce the uncertainty around the timing of exit ofageing thermal generation and the risk of premature generation plant exit. These includemeasures to ensure that essential system services are available, the 42-month notice of closurerule, and Retail Reliability Obligations that may be triggered. The ESB will consider whether thereare additional measures needed during the transition p

This paper sets out for consultation a number of potential solutions to identified problems and opportunities. Overview of workstreams within Post-2025 market design program To deliver future market designs, the ESB set up seven workstreams to consider the issues and develop potential solutions. The initial work has been done by the market bodies the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC .

Related Documents:

A27c1 Louis Stephens Dr Ext (NL) Little Drive Poplar Pike Lane 0 4 0.72 3,036,000.00 Division 2025 2025 A28b Davis Dr Farm Pond Rd US 64 2 4 1.1 10,056,446.40 Division 2025 2025 A2b Southall Rd Southall Rd (Existing) Hedingham Blvd 0 4 0.28 3,800,000.00 Division 2025 2025 A407b3 NC 42 NC

«vérifications périodiques " page 2 sur 8 r.c. reglement de la consultation sommaire article premier : objet et etendue de la consultation 3 1.1 - objet de la consultation 3 1.2 - etendue de la consultation 3 1.3 - decomposition de la consultation 3 1.4 - conditions de participation des concurrents 3 1.5 - nomenclature communautaire 3 art

Figure 6 Canada: Window & Door Demand by Market, 2010 - 2025 (US bil) 18 Table 3 Canada: Window & Door Demand by Market, 2010 - 2025 (US mil) 18 Figure 7 Canada: Window & Door Demand by Market, 2010 - 2025 (%) 20 Table 4 Canada: Window & Door Supply & Demand, 2010 - 2025 (US mil) 21

Consultation paper overview & next steps EIOPA carries out this consultation in accordance with Article 29(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010. This Consultation Paper presents the Supervisory Statement on ORSA in the context of COVID-19. EIOPA will consider the feedback received, 3 develop Impact assessment and publish a Final Report on the consultation and submit the Supervisory Statement for .

The results of the consultation activities will be summarised in a synopsis report annexed to the impact assessment and published on the consultation page. 5. Summary /overview on consultation activities by stakeholder groups and indicative timing The following table summarises the envisaged consultation activities, their stakeholder coverage and

American Legion 5th District 5th District Commander, Western Springs Cicero Post #96 DesPlaines Post #36 George L. Giles Post #87, Chicago Maywood Post #133, Melrose Park Morton Grove Post #134 Schiller Park Post #104 T.H.B. Post #187, Elmhurst Edward Feely Post #190, Brookfield Richard J. Daley Post #197, Chicago

This study conducted by Center for Automotive Researchthe (CAR) estimates the likely parameters of the U.S. motor vehicle market and industry in 2025. The first section discusses a general outlook for the U.S. motor vehicle market in the year 2025 based on long term social and economic factors. The second

day I am going to buy a car just like that.'' He thei1 explained : ''You see, mister, Harm can't waJk. I go downtow11. and look at' all e nice Tiiii;-J(S in the store window, and come home and try tc, tell Harry what it is all about, but r tell it very good. Some day J am going to make