Hud.gov Espanol.hud.gov Tiered Environmental Review .
U.S. Department of Housing and UrbanDevelopment451 Seventh Street, SWWashington, DC 20410www.hud.govespanol.hud.govTiered Environmental Review for Activity/Project forUnspecified Sites and Categorically Excluded Subject toSection 58.5 Pursuant to 24 CFR 58.35(a)Project InformationProject Name:CDBG Housing AcquisitionResponsible Entity:County of Prince William, Office of Housing and Community DevelopmentGrant Recipient:Insight, Inc.State/Local ID:#18-26CD-4205-1; #19-27CD-4205-1; #20-28CD-4205-1; #22-30CD-4205-1Preparer:Certifying OfficerName and Title:Timmons GroupJoan S. Duckett, Community Planning & Development Division ChiefPrince William County Office of Housing & Community DevelopmentConsultant:Timmons GroupProject Location: Throughout the County of Prince William, Virginia.Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]: The project will providefunding to acquire property in Prince William County to be used as part of INSIGHT's SupportedLiving Program. One component of the program is to provide a stable living environment that offersstructure and continuity. The program is designed for persons with mild to moderateintellectual/developmental disabilities who are employed in the community and need support in areasof medical case management and supervision, budgeting, shopping, and social and other activities ofdaily living.Approximate size of the project area: The entire County area is approximately 350 square miles,however, individual project sites are anticipated to be generally on the order of less than 1 acre.Length of time covered by this review: 5 years; FY 18 - FY 22Maximum number of dwelling units or lots addressed by this tiered review: Likely to includeone acquisition per year.Level of Environmental Review Determination: This proposed project is a Categorical ExclusionSubject To Section 58.5 (CEST), per 58.35 (a)(5) Acquisition (including leasing) or disposition of, orequity loans on an existing structure, or acquisition (including leasing) of vacant land provided that thestructure or land acquired, financed, or disposed of will be retained for the same use.1
Funding InformationGrant NumberHUD Program#18-26CD-4205-1Community Development Block Grant#19-27CD-4205-1Community Development Block Grant#20-28CD-4205-1Community Development Block Grant#21-29CD-4205-1Community Development Block Grant#22-30CD-4205-1Community Development Block GrantEstimated Total HUD Funded Amount:Estimated Total Project Cost:Funding Amount 225,000 225,000 450,000N/A 350,000 1,250,000TBD(HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]Other funding includes:FY 2018Carryover from Previous Year: 225,000FY 2019Carryover from Previous Year: 225,000FY 2020Carryover from Previous Year:N/AFY 2021Carryover from Previous Year:N/AFY 2022Carryover from Previous Year:TBD2
Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5; 58.6 Laws & Authorities, & Written StrategiesCompliance Factors:Statutes, ExecutiveOrders, and Regulationslisted at 24 CFR 50.4,58.5, and 58.6Complianceachieved atthe broadlevel ofreview?If Yes: Describe compliance determinations made at thebroad level.If No: Describe the policy, standard, or process to befollowed in the site-specific review.STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.6Airport HazardsSpecific project sites will be assessed for airport hazards.Yes No24 CFR Part 51 Subpart DCoastal BarrierResourcesSee map and FAA list in Appendix C.YesNoThe proposed project is not located in a community listed inthe Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS). The projectis in compliance. See CBRS map in Appendix D.YesNoSpecific project sites will be assessed for floodplains duringTier II studies.CBRA, amended by theCoastal BarrierImprovement Act of 1990[16 USC 3501]Flood InsuranceFlood Disaster ProtectionAct of 1973 and NationalFlood Insurance Reform Actof 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128and 42 USC 5154a]STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.5Clean AirPrince William County is located in an 8-Hour OzoneYes NoClean Air Act, as amended,particularly section 176(c) &(d); 40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93Coastal ZoneManagementNonattainment Area (see Appendix E). However, thisproposal does not have the potential to emit significantemissions of air pollution due to no plans for newconstruction or demolition activities. Project is incompliance.YesNoYesNoYesNoCoastal Zone ManagementAct, sections 307(c) & (d)Contamination andToxic SubstancesThe proposed project is located in a state and county thatparticipates in the Coastal Zone Management (CZM)Program. However, the project does not include newconstruction or conversion of land use facilitating thedevelopment or public, commercial, or industrial facilitiesand is therefore in compliance. See Appendix F.Site contamination will be evaluated on individual projectlocations per current HUD guidance.24 CFR Part 50.3(i) &58.5(i)(2)Endangered SpeciesEndangered Species Act of1973, particularly section 7;50 CFR Part 402The project consists of acquisition of existing housing inpreviously established residential areas, and will thus have‘No Effect’ due to the nature of the activities involved in theproject and the current development of the sites. Based onthe review, the project is in compliance with the EndangeredSpecies Act of 1973 (ESA). See Appendix G.3
Explosive andFlammable HazardsYesNoThe proposed HUD-assisted project is not a hazardousfacility (a facility that mainly stores, handles, or processesflammable or combustible chemicals, such as bulk storagefacilities, refineries, etc.). Nor does this project include anyof the following activities: development, construction,rehabilitation that will increase residential densities, orconversion. Therefore, the project is in compliance.YesNoThe proposed project does not include any activities,including new construction, acquisition of undeveloped landor conversion, that could convert agricultural land to a nonagricultural use. The proposed project is for acquisition ofexisting homes. The project is in compliance with theFarmland Protection Policy Act.YesNoIt is the Policy of Prince William County OHCD not toconstruct or rehabilitate buildings located in a floodplain.OHCD does not expect to acquire housing in a floodplain.However, floodplains will need to be determined for theindividual sites during Tier II evaluation.YesNoTo be determined during Tier II for individual sites. Letterto be sent to VDHR for the individual sites.YesNoThis project involves acquisition of existing homes and doesnot include major rehabilitation or conversion of use. Projectis in compliance.YesNoThe proposed project area is not located within theboundaries of a Sole Source Aquifer nor in a recharge area,as evidenced by maps in Appendix H. Project is incompliance.YesNoYesNoThe proposed project includes acquisition of existing homes.Acquisition without expansion of building footprint is not anactivity that could be classified as new construction asdefined in Executive Order 11990 (E.O.). Project is incompliance.There are no Wild and Scenic Rivers in Virginia; however,there are several Nationwide River Inventory (NRI)designated segments in the Commonwealth, and one inPrince William County: Bull Run, listed in 1982 for Historicvalue (see map in Appendix I). However, the acquisition ofexisting homes will not impact the historic value of this NRIsegment. Project is in compliance.ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICEEnvironmental JusticeYesNo24 CFR Part 51 Subpart CFarmlands ProtectionFarmland Protection PolicyAct of 1981, particularlysections 1504(b) and 1541;7 CFR Part 658Floodplain ManagementExecutive Order 11988,particularly section 2(a); 24CFR Part 55Historic PreservationNational HistoricPreservation Act of 1966,particularly sections 106 and110; 36 CFR Part 800Noise Abatement andControlNoise Control Act of 1972,as amended by the QuietCommunities Act of 1978;24 CFR Part 51 Subpart BSole Source AquifersSafe Drinking Water Act of1974, as amended,particularly section 1424(e);40 CFR Part 149Wetlands ProtectionExecutive Order 11990,particularly sections 2 and 5Wild and Scenic RiversWild and Scenic Rivers Actof 1968, particularly section7(b) and (c)To be determined at the project level.Executive Order 128984
Determination:Extraordinary circumstances exist and this project may result in significant environmentalimpact. This project requires preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA); ORThere are no extraordinary circumstances which would require completion of an EA, and thisproject may remain CEST.Preparer Signature:Emily PortwoodEnvironmental ScientistTimmons GroupDate:06/03/20Responsible Entity Agency Official Signature:Assistant Director of Housing6.2021Date:Joan S. DuckettCommunity Planning & Development Division ChiefPrince William County Office of Housing & Community DevelopmentThis original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by theResponsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFRPart 58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s).This document represents the Tier 1 or Broad-Level review only. As individual sites areselected, this review must be supplemented by individual Tier 2 or Site-Specific reviews foreach site. All laws and authorities requiring site-specific analysis will be addressed in theseindividual reviews.5
APPENDIX A: Site-Specific or Tier 2 ReviewsUpdate this document as site-specific reviews are completed. Complete each site-specific reviewaccording to the written strategies outlined in the broad-level review and attach it in the environmentalreview record.Site-specific project nameAddress or location6
TIER 2 ERR CHECKLISTProject Name: INSIGHT, Inc. AcquisitionIdentification Numbers: HUD# 22-30CD-4205-1REGULATORY OMPLIANCEACHIEVEDCREFERENCES TO NOTES PROVIDINGDOCUMENTATION, SOURCES, AND EXPLANATIONOF CHECKED BOXESHistoric PropertiesFloodplain ManagementAirport [except for Clear Zone Notification of[24 CFR Part 51D 303 (a)(3)]Flood InsuranceFlood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 andNational Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994[42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC 5154a]Site ContaminationEnvironmental Justice(Executive Order 12898)Prepared By:-Title:Date:Appendix A
Use This Space to Provide Further Comments to Items on the Checklist, as NeededAdditional Studies Performed, if Any (Summarize Here and Attach Documentation)Mitigation Measures Needed, If AnyConclusions and RecommendationsNOTE: This Tier 2 Report is to be attached to and/or filed with the corresponding Tier 1 Report.Appendix A
APPENDIX B. Maps
02.55Miles10 USGS The National Map: National Boundaries Dataset, NationalElevation Dataset, Geographic Names Information System,National Hydrography Dataset, National Land Cover Database,National Structures Dataset, and National TransportationDataset; U.S. Census Bureau - TIGER/Line; HERE Road DataPrince William County, Manassas, and Manassas Park
02.55Miles10 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, Intermap, increment P Corp.,GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, KadasterNL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (HongKong), swisstopo, MapmyIndia, OpenStreetMap contributors,and the GIS User Community, Copyright: 2013 NationalGeographic Society, i-cubed, USGS The National Map: NationalBoundaries Dataset, National Elevation Dataset, GeographicNames Information System, National Hydrography Dataset,National Land Cover Database, National Structures Dataset, andNational Transportation Dataset; U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line; HERE Road DataPrince William County, Manassas, and Manassas Park
APPENDIX C. Airport Hazards
Airport SafetyLegend Civilian 2,500 foot radiusMilitary 15,000 foot radiusN 2016 Google10 mi
FAA Listed Facilities: Prince William County, LocationID AAEAAEAFacilityNameOwnershipMANASSAS RGNL/HARRY P DAVIS FIELDPUPRINCE WILLIAM HEALTH CENTERPRADEN FIELDPRBUILDING 250PRLM BUILDING 110PRPRINCE WILLIAM W
APPENDIX D. Coastal Barrier Resources
VA-29VA-30JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTALBARRIER RESOURCES A-36VA-38VA-25 VA-24VA-01PVA-39PVA-41 4PAT LAN T ICVA-55 VA-12OC A-10VA-09VA-06PK05PK05Number of CBRS Units:VA-61PNumber of System Units:Number of Otherwise Protected Areas:Total Acres:Upland Acres:Associated Aquatic Habitat Acres:Shoreline ies of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) shown on this map were transferred from the officialCBRS maps for this area and are depicted on this map (in red) for informational purposes only. The official CBRS maps areenacted by Congress via the Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended, and are maintained by the U.S. Fish and WildlifeService. The official CBRS maps are available for download at http://www.fws.gov/habitatconservation/coastal barrier.html.
APPENDIX E. Clean Air
Ozone 8hr 1997 StandardMay 1, 2019Ozone 8-hr (1997 standard)Maintenance (NAAQS revoked)001:577,79155101020 mi20 kmNonattainment (NAAQS revoked)U.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) - Office of Air Quality Planningand Standards (OAQPS) 2019 Microsoft Corporation 2019 HERE
Ozone 8hr 2008 StandardMay 1, 2019Ozone 8-hr (2008 standard)Maintenance001:577,79155101020 mi20 kmNonattainmentU.S. EPA Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) - Office of Air Quality Planningand Standards (OAQPS) 2019 Microsoft Corporation 2019 HERE
Region III Plan SummaryDistrict of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia; Attainment Demonstration for the 1997 8Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Washington, DC-MD-VAModerate Nonattainment AreaTitle: District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia; Attainment Demonstration for the1997 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the Washington, DC-MDVA Moderate Nonattainment AreaFederal Register Dates: Final Rule 80 FR 19206 (April 10, 2015) Proposed Rule 78 FR17161 (March 20, 2013)EPA Effective date: May 11, 2015State Submittal Date: DC- June 12, 2007, MD – June 4, 2007, and VA June 12, 2007Affected Area: District of Columbia; Calvert, Frederick, Charles, Montgomery and Prince George’sCounties in Maryland; and Alexandria City, Arlington County, Fairfax City, Fairfax County, Falls ChurchCity, Manassas and Manassas Park Cities, and Prince William County, VirginiaBackground:The District of Columbia, the State of Maryland, and the Commonwealth of Virginia submittedformal SIP revisions on June 12, 2007, June 4, 2007, and June 12, 2007, respectively (hereafterthe June 2007 SIP revisions). These June 2007 SIP revisions were submitted to address CAArequirements for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and included the 2002 base year emissions inventory,the 15 percent reasonable further progress plan (RFP) (15 % RFP plan), RFP contingencymeasures, an attainment demonstration to show attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS by June15, 2010, a reasonably available control measures (RACM) analysis, and contingency measuresfor failure to attain. In addition, the submission included the transportation conformity 2008,2009, and 2010 year MVEBs associated with the RFP plan, the attainment demonstration andcontingency measures, respectively. The District of Columbia Department of the Environment(DDOE), the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE), and the Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality (VADEQ) (hereafter referred to as the three States) jointly developed theJune 2007 SIP revisions.1These elements of the Washington Area 8-hour ozone plan were required for the WashingtonArea by sections 172(c), 182(a), and 182(b)(1) of the CAA due to the classification of theWashington Area as a moderate ozone nonattainment area under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. Theboundaries of the Washington Area are defined in the tables for “1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS(Primary and Secondary)” in 40 CFR 81.309, 81.321 and 81.347.21 The three States developed and submitted the “Plan to Improve Air Quality in the Washington, DC–MD–VARegion, State Implementation Plan (SIP) for 8–Hour Ozone Standard, Moderate Area SIP” (hereafter theWashington Area 8-hour ozone plan).2 Effective July 20, 2012 (77 FR 30088, May 21, 2012), EPA designated and classified nonattainment areas underthe 2008 ozone NAAQS codified at 40 CFR 50.15 for most areas of the country including the Washington Area.The Washington Area was designated as nonattainment and classified as marginal nonattainment. The boundaries
On September 11, 2011 (76 FR 58116), EPA approved portions of the June 2007 SIP revisionsfor the three States including the 2002 base year emissions inventory, 15% RFP plan andassociated MVEBs for 2008, RFP contingency measures, and the RACM analysis.Summary of the Plan:In this rulemaking action, EPA has approved the remaining portions of the June 2007 SIPrevisions for the 1997 ozone NAAQS including the attainment demonstration, thecontingency measures, and the associated 2009 and 2010 year MVEBs.3 In a March 20,2013 notice of proposed rulemaking (the March 20, 2013 NPR), EPA proposed to approve theseremaining elements of the June 2007 SIP revisions. 78 FR 17161. The initial comment periodclosed on May 9, 2013 (78 FR 27160); however, EPA reopened the comment period until June10, 2013. In this final rule, EPA has approved the portions of the June 2007 SIP revisions whichwe proposed for approval in the March 20, 2013 NPR: the attainment demonstration,contingency measures, and 2009 and 2010 year MVEBs.Contingency Measures:Contingency Measure Reductions for the Attainment DemonstrationReductions (tons perozone season day)PlanVOCNOxRef. No. Contingency Measure6.4.5Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emission Standards0.01.776.3.1Phase I and Phase II Emissions Standards for Gasoline1.490.04Powered Non-Road Utility Engines6.3.2Emissions Standards for Diesel-Powered Non-Road0.393.28Utility Engines of 50 or More Horsepower6.3.3Emissions Standards for Spark Ignition Marine Engine1.420.06.3.4Emissions Standards for Large Spark Ignition Engines0.540.966.2.12 & Ozone Transport Commission Portable Fuel Containers4.620.06.2.17RuleTOTAL REDUCTIONS8.466.05Control Measures and Emissions Reductions:Control Measures and 2009 Emission Reductions in the Washington AreaReductions (tons per day)Plan Ref.No. Note 1Source SectorPoint Source Measures – RFP Plan Contingency MeasuresVOCNOxof the ozone nonattainment area classified as moderate under the 1997 ozone NAAQS are the same as those of theozone nonattainment area classified as marginal under the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 40 CFR 81.309, 81.321 and81.347. Hereafter, when referring to the Washington Area in relation to SIP requirements required solely due to the2008 ozone NAAQS, the term “Washington 2008 Ozone Nonattainment Area” will be used.3 The attainment demonstration was required under 40 CFR 51.908 to demonstrate attainment of the 1997 ozoneNAAQS by the applicable attainment date of June 15, 2010 (the June 2010 attainment date).
State NOx RACT and Regional NOx TransportRequirement (RACT, NOx SIP Call, CAIR, HAA)Subtotal Point Source Measures Area Sources MeasuresRFP Plan Area Source Measures – 2009 reductions6.1.20.00128.760.00128.766.2.11 Mobile Equipment Repair and Refinishing Rule3.596.2.12 Portable Fuel Containers Rule: Phase I9.3Architectural and Industrial Maintenance Coatings6.2.1310.82Rule6.2.14 Reformulated Consumer Products Rule: Phase I6.346.2.15 Solvent Cleaning Operations Rule2.996.2.16 Industrial Adhesives and Sealants Rule2.42Additional Area Source Measures Beyond the RFP Plan – 2009 Reductions0.00.06.2.18 Reformulated Consumer Products Rule: Phase II6.2.17 Portable Fuel Containers Rule: Phase IISubtotal Area Sources Measures Nonroad Measures (NONROAD Model) Note 26.3.1 EPA Non-Road Gasoline Engines Rule6.3.2 EPA Non-Road Diesel Engines RuleEmissions standards for spark ignition marine6.3.3enginesEmissions standards for large spark ignition6.3.4enginesOther Nonroad Measures (not covered by the NONROAD Model)6.3.6 Standards for LocomotiveSubtotal Nonroad Source Measures Onroad Measures (MOBILE and TDM Model) Note 36.4.2 Enhanced Vehicle Inspection/Maintenance (I/M)6.4.4 National Low Emission Vehicle Program6.4.5 Tier 2 Motor Vehicle Emission Standards6.4.6 Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine RuleOther Onroad Measures Note 4Transportation Control Measures, Vehicle6.4.7Technology, Fuel, or Maintenance MeasuresSubtotal On-road Mobile Source MeasuresOther Measures6.5 Voluntary BundleSubtotal Other 90.190.300.30
Totals 87.01184.64Notes:1. The measure number assigned in Chapter 6 of the plan document of the June 2007 SIPRevisions.2. The NONRPOAD model can be run to project emissions from all classes of nonroad enginescovered by this model for an entire geographic area. This model will apply all applicableemission standards to all classes of nonroad engines covered by this model for an entiregeographic area Therefore, the total emissions reductions from all applicable EPA nonroadengine rules are presented in aggregate. Locomotive engines are not included within the scopeof the NONROAD Model.2. On-road mobile source emissions require the use of two models. The first is EPA’sMOBILE6 model which generates emissions factors. The model can be configured to generateemissions factors that account for all EPA emissions standards, fuel standards and stateimplemented measures (such as I/M)) applicable in the area for the year being modeled. The 3States have elected to run the MOBILE6 model in this manner. The 3 States thus generatedemissions factors that account for all the control programs simultaneously; therefore, thereductions from each individual program are not computed, only the aggregate reductions. Thesecond model is the transportation demand model (TDM) which predicts future year activitylevels for on-road mobile sources – vehicle miles travelled and vehicle starts – for theWashington Area which accounts for the planned changes in the highway network. The futureyear emissions factors are applied to the activity levels to generate predicted emissions level.3. Certain measures are not easy to quantify using MOBLE6 and the TDM because their impactis below the resolution of the TDM model. Some are transportation control measures designedto reduce vehicle miles traveled or vehicle trips. Other of these measures represents retrofit oftransit vehicles or purchase of cleaner fueled transit buses.Attainment Status Based Upon Recent Air Quality Data:Since the March 20, 2013 NPR, the three States have submitted and certified complete ambientair quality monitoring (AQ data) for the entire 2013 ozone monitoring season. EPA has releasedthe final 2011-2013 design values and posted these at http://www.epa.gov/airtrends/values.html.The 2011-2013 design values show the Washington Area continues to attain the 1997 ozoneNAAQS. Table 1 shows these design values for monitors in the Washington Area in parts perbillion (ppb) ozone. These design values in Table 1 demonstrate that the Washington Areacontinues to meet the 1997 ozone NAAQS.Table 1. Actual Monitored Design Values (DVs) for 2011 to 2013 PeriodDV (ppb)Site DataAIRS IDSite NameCounty/CityState 2011-201311-001-0041 River Terrace--DC7211-001-0043 McMillan--DC7924-009-0010 CalvertCalvert Co.MD7724-017-0010 Southern MDCharles Co.MD77
rederick Municipal AirportRockvilleHU-BeltsvillePG Equestrian CenterBeltsvilleAurora HillsFranconiaAshburnLong ParkFrederick Co.Montgomery Co.Prince George's Co.Prince George'sPrince George'sArlington CountyFairfax CountyLoudoun CountyPrince William CountyMDMDMDMDMDVAVAVAVA747476817279797169EPA has also examined available 2014 ozone season AQ data. EPA notes that this AQ data ispreliminary. EPA examined the data entered into EPA’s Air Quality System (AQS) available asof February 10, 2015. It has not undergone all the quality assurance/quality control review andcertification necessary to be used for regulatory purposes, and as of February 10, 2015 may notcover the entire 2014 ozone season for the Washington Area which ended October 31, 2014. SeeTable D-3 “Ozone Monitoring Season by State” in Appendix D to 40 CFR Part 58.Transportation Conformity:TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY EMISSIONS BUDGETS FOR THE WASHINGTON, DC-MD-VAAREAEffective date ofVOCNOXType of control strategy SIPYearadequacy determination(TPD) (TPD)or SIP approvalAttainment Demonstration200966.5February 22, 2013 (78146.1 FR 9044), publishedFebruary 7, 2013.Contingency Measures Plan2010–February 22, 2013 (78144.3 FR 9044), publishedFebruary 7, 2013.Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets:The Washington Area MVEBs for the attainment demonstration and contingency measures arebased on the projected 2009 and 2010, respectively, mobile source emissions, accounting for allmobile control measures. The budgets are equal to the projected 2009 and 2010, respectively,on-road mobile source emission inventories minus reductions from transportation controlmeasures.The MVEBs for the 2009 attainment year and the 2010 contingency plan NOx MVEBs areshown in Table 8. These are the budgets EPA determined were adequate in the February 7, 2013(76 FR 9044) notice of adequacy.The Washington Area MVEBS for the 2009 Attainment Plan and 2010Contingency Plan
Budget C (tons per day)NOx (tons per day)200966.5146.12010N/A144.3Conclusion:EPA has approved the attainment demonstrations, contingency measures, and associated 2009and 2010 year MVEBs for the Washington Area which were submitted to EPA as SIP revisionsby the three States in the June 2007 SIP revisions based on a determination that they meetapplicable requirements in the CAA.EPA Region III Contact: Christopher Cripps (3AP30), U.S. EPA Region III1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029215-814-2179; cripps.christopher@epa.gov
APPENDIX F. Coastal Zone Management
APPENDIX G. Endangered Species
United States Department of the InteriorFISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICEVirginia Ecological Services Field Office6669 Short LaneGloucester, VA 23061-4410Phone: (804) 693-6694 Fax: (804) /In Reply Refer To:Consultation Code: 05E2VA00-2021-SLI-2414Event Code: 05E2VA00-2021-E-07038Project Name: Prince William County EAsMarch 03, 2021Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed projectlocation or may be affected by your proposed projectTo Whom It May Concern:The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, aswell as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of yourproposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills therequirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of theEndangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Any activityproposed on National Wildlife Refuge lands must undergo a 'Compatibility Determination'conducted by the Refuge. Please contact the individual Refuges to discuss any questions orconcerns.New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution ofspecies, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free tocontact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts tofederally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed criticalhabitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of theAct, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can becompleted formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification becompleted by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning andimplementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requestedthrough the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list.The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and theecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of theAct and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required toutilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered
03/03/2021Event Code: 05E2VA00-2021-E-070382species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/ordesignated critical habitat.A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings havingsimilar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of thehuman environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biologicalevaluat
Grant Recipient: Insight, Inc. State/Local ID: #18-26CD-4205-1; #19-27CD-4205-1; #20-28CD-4205-1; #22-30CD-4205-1 Preparer: Timmons Group Certifying Officer Name and Title: Joan S. Duckett, Community Planning & Development Division Chief Prince William County Office of Housing & Community Development Consultant: Timmons Group
Ott Steve Production Division Director stephen.p.ott@hud.gov . KROLCZYK STEVEN Account Executive Steven.T.Krolczyk@hud.gov 313-234-7517 Detroit . PHILLIPS LISA Grant Specialist Lisa.K.Phillips@hud.gov 313-234-7579 Detroit REEVES I-SHA Grant Specialist I-Sha.N.Reeves@hud.gov Detroit
To pause / resume video recording use Shift F9 hotkey. Action! HUD If you do not want to include HUD in recordings please check Do not record HUD in games and applications option in Settings/HUD or hide HUD before recording start with F6 hotkey. Introduction Games & applications
OSCAR 18 AND 228 Hud-Son Portable Sawmill Hud-Son Forest Equipment, Inc. 8201 State Rt. 12., PO Box 345 Barneveld, NY 13304 Phone: 1.800.765.SAWS Fax: 315.896.2627 e-mail info@hud-son.com WWW.HUD-SON.COM OWNERS MANUAL 8201 STATE ROUTE 12 BARNEVELD NY 13304
Canon Sx40 Manual Espanol Canon Sx40 Manual Espanol Chapter 1 : Canon Sx40 Manual Espanol PowerShot SX40 HS - Support - Download drivers - Canon Spain Download drivers, software, firmware and manuals for your Canon product and get access to online technical support resources and troubleshooting. Canon PowerShot SX40 HS. Seleccione el contenido .
Marco Curricular del Programa de Español 2016 vi COMITÉ DE LECTORES Dra. India C. Bobonis Pastrana Especialista académica Exdirectora del Programa de Español Prof.a Noemí Crespo Colón Maestra de Español Esc. Santiago Iglesia Pantín Distrito Escolar San Juan II Prof.a Janicet
vocablos (más de 1400) del diccionario español-wayuunaiki, por lo general, son los que provienen de los significados de los vocablos de aquella selección. No se propone tratar aquí la gramática del wayuunaiki ni mucho menos la del español. Para un trat
El amigo llega. Los dos entran en el café. José el menú. 5. José hambre y su amigo tiene . 6. José un sándwich de jamón y queso y su amigo una gaseosa. 7. José paga la . Answer with sí. 1. ¿Aprende María el español? Sí, María aprende el español. 2. ¿Aprende el español en la escuela? Sí, aprende el español en la escuela. 3.
M-V 12:15PM Inglés M-J 5:30PM Español V 7:30PM Español S 9:00AM Bilingüe Misas de la Fin de la Semana S 5:30PM Inglés D 7:00AM Español D 9:00AM Inglés D 11:30AM Inglés D 1:30PM Español RECONCILIACIÓN: La reconciliación se lleva a cabo en la Capilla de la Misa Diaria. L 8:00-9:00AM M-V 6:00-7:00PM S 4:00-5:00PM D 12:30-1:00PM ADORACIÓN:
