Glacial-Interglacial Atmospheric CO Change —The Glacial .

3y ago
25 Views
2 Downloads
2.33 MB
17 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Baylee Stein
Transcription

ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, VOL. 20, NO. 5, 2003, PP. 677–693677Glacial-Interglacial Atmospheric CO2 Change—The Glacial Burial HypothesisNing ZENG Department of Meteorology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, USA(Received 22 January 2003; revised 29 April 2003)ABSTRACTOrganic carbon buried under the great ice sheets of the Northern Hemisphere is suggested to bethe missing link in the atmospheric CO2 change over the glacial-interglacial cycles. At glaciation, theadvancement of continental ice sheets buries vegetation and soil carbon accumulated during warmer periods. At deglaciation, this burial carbon is released back into the atmosphere. In a simulation over twoglacial-interglacial cycles using a synchronously coupled atmosphere-land-ocean carbon model forced byreconstructed climate change, it is found that there is a 547-Gt terrestrial carbon release from glacialmaximum to interglacial, resulting in a 60-Gt (about 30-ppmv) increase in the atmospheric CO2 , with theremainder absorbed by the ocean in a scenario in which ocean acts as a passive buffer. This is in contrastto previous estimates of a land uptake at deglaciation. This carbon source originates from glacial burial,continental shelf, and other land areas in response to changes in ice cover, sea level, and climate. The inputof light isotope enriched terrestrial carbon causes atmospheric δ 13 C to drop by about 0.3 at deglaciation,followed by a rapid rise towards a high interglacial value in response to oceanic warming and regrowthon land. Together with other ocean based mechanisms such as change in ocean temperature, the glacialburial hypothesis may offer a full explanation of the observed 80–100-ppmv atmospheric CO2 change. Key words: atmospheric CO2 , ice age, glacial burial hypothesis, climate1. IntroductionAtmospheric CO2 concentration has variedthroughout Earth’s history, often in synchrony withtemperature and other climate variables. Measure-ments of air trapped in Antarctica ice cores have revealed large CO2 variations over the last four 100-kyr(thousands of years) glacial-interglacial cycles, in particular, the 80-100 ppmv increase from glacial maximato interglacials (Petit et al., 1999; Fig. 1).Fig. 1. History of atmospheric CO2 (black line, in ppmv) and temperature (red, inrelative units) over the last 420,000 years from the Vostok ice core; after Petit et al.(1999)*E-mail: zeng@atmos.umd.edu; http://www.atmos.umd.edu/ zeng

678ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCESVOL. 20Table 1. Estimates of the difference of carbon stored on land between the Holocene and the last glacial maximum usingvarious methods (in Gt; Holocene minus LGM: positive value indicates larger storage at the Holocene). The sourcesare grouped into three categories according to the method used: marine 13 C inference (with the δ 13 C value listed),paleoecological data, and biosphere model forced by reconstructed climate (with the climate model and biospheremodel listed). Modified from Maslin and Thomas (2003)SourceMethodLand carbon difference(Holocene–LGM)Shackleton, 1977Berger and Vincent, 1986Curry et al., 1988Duplessy et al., 1988Broecker and Peng, 1993Bird et al., 1994Maslin et al., 1995Beerling, 1999ocean δ 13 C, 0.7%0ocean δ 13 C, 0.40%0ocean δ 13 C, 0.46%0ocean δ 13 C, 0.32%0ocean δ 13 C, 0.35%0ocean δ 13 Cocean δ 13 C 0.40 0.14%013 C inventory1000570650450425270–720400–1000 (700)550–680Adams et al., 1990Van Campo et al., 1993palaeoecological datapalaeoecological data1350430–930 (713)Crowley, 1995Adams and Faure, 1998palaeoecological datapalaeoecological data750–1050900–1900 (1500)Prentice and Fung, 1990Friedlingstein et al., 1992GISS, Holdridge/C DensitySellers, SLAVE-30 to 50300Prentice et al., 1993Esser and Lautenschlager., 1994Friedlingstein et al., 1995ECMWF T21, BIOMEECHAM, HRBMGISS/Sellers, SLAVE300–700–213 to 460507–717 (612)Peng et al., 1995Francois et al., 1998Beerling, 1999Otto et al., 2002Kaplan et al., 2002Pollen Recon., OBMECHAM2, CARAIBUGAMP/NCAR, SDGVM4 PMIP models, CARAIBUM, LPJ470–1014134–606535–801 (668)828–1106821This studyCCM1, VEGAS–395 to –749 (–547)Numerous attempts have been made over the lasttwo decades to explain the lower atmospheric CO2 atglacial times. Nearly all hypotheses rely on mechanisms of oceanic origin, such as changes in ocean temperature and salinity, reorganization of the thermohaline circulation, changes in carbonate chemistry, enhanced biological pump due to dust fertilization, andeffects of sea ice changes (Martin, 1990; Broecker andHenderson, 1998; Sigman and Boyle, 2000; Archer etal., 2000; Falkowski et al., 2000; Stephens and Keeling, 2000; Gildor and Tziperman, 2001), but there isno widely accepted scenario. Attempts in combining these processes also fall short of explaining thefull range and amplitude of observational constraints(Ridgwell, 2001).Part of the difficulty is that besides the changein the atmospheric carbon pool, these ocean basedtheories also have to accommodate additional carbon from the terrestrial biosphere which is generallythought to have lower carbon storage at glacial times.Estimates of terrestrial carbon difference between theHolocene and the last glacial maximum (LGM) rangefrom –213 to 1900 Gt (Gigaton or 1015 g), with pollenbased paleoecologically reconstructed estimates oftenlarger than marine carbon 13 inference and terrestrialcarbon model results (Shackleton, 1977; Adams et al.,1990; Prentice and Fung, 1990; Crowley, 1995; andTable 1). A typical partitioning of glacial to interglacial carbon cycle change is a 170-Gt increase in theatmosphere, a 500-Gt increase on land, and a 670-Gtdecrease in the ocean and sediments (e.g., Sundquist,1993; Sigman and Boyle, 2000).The terrestrial biosphere has been thought to storeless carbon at glacial times because the drier, colder,and low CO2 glacial climate is less favorable for vegetation growth. In addition, at glacial maximum, largeareas in the Northern Hemisphere are covered underice, thus it is supposed that less land is available forcarbon storage, which is partially compensated for bycarbon accumulation on raised continental shelves due

NO. 5NING ZENGto lower glacial sea level.2. The glacial burial hypothesisHowever, looking at the glacial-interglacial cycle asan evolving phenomenon, a question naturally arises(Olson et al., 1985): if no carbon was present underthe ice sheets at a glacial maximum, what happenedto the carbon accumulated in those areas during thepreceding interglacial? The consideration of the fateof this carbon pool has led to the proposal that glacialburial carbon is the missing link in the glacial CO2problem. A rudimentary version of the hypothesis follows.At interglacial time, the organic carbon stored inthe terrestrial biosphere is about 2100 Gt, of whichapproximately 600 Gt is distributed in the vegetationbiomass of leaf, root, and wood, and the other 1500 Gtis stored as soil carbon (Schlesinger, 1991). While vegetation carbon is mainly in the tropical and temperateforests, soil carbon tends to concentrate in middle andhigh latitude cold regions, because of the slow decomposition rate there.As the glacial condition sets in, vegetation andsoil carbon gets covered under ice, and thus insulatedfrom contact with the atmosphere. Given the presentcarbon distribution and the ice cover distribution atthe last glacial maximum, the amount of carbon thatwould have been covered under ice is estimated about500 Gt.At deglaciation, this glacial burial carbon is exposed to the atmosphere again, and subsequently decomposed and released into the atmosphere, thus contributing to the observed increase in atmospheric CO2 .The sequence of events at the stages of a full glacialinterglacial cycle are depicted in Fig. 2.If the 500 Gt of carbon from land were released intothe atmosphere overnight, it would lead to an increaseof atmospheric CO2 concentration of 250 ppmv, morethan a doubling of the glacial CO2 value. This potential cannot be realized because most of this carbonwould have been absorbed by the ocean. The excessivecarbon would have been lowered by half in less than10 years as it gets into the upper ocean, and furtherlowered to 45 ppmv in about 1000 years due to deepocean mixing. A further reduction to 15 ppmv on thetimescale of 5-10 kyr would result from ocean sedimentdissolution (Sigman and Boyle, 2000).Additional factors can slow down the increase inatmospheric CO2 . First, the retreat of ice sheetstakes place on a timescale of 10 000 years becausethe negative feedback placed on temperature to meltice. Thus the release of terrestrial carbon is a relatively slow process. Secondly, as ice sheets retreat,679vegetation regrowth takes place via primary and secondary successions, acting as a carbon sink for the atmosphere. However, regrowth is slowed by the speed ofseed dispersal, and more importantly, by soil development which can take thousands of years or longer to gofrom bare rock to being able to support boreal forests.For instance, some northern soil has not reached equilibrium since the retreat of the Laurentide Ice Sheet(Harden et al., 1992).The details of glaciation history are not wellknown. An alternative hypothesis about the fate ofglacial burial carbon is that as ice sheets advance,Fig. 2. Illustration of the glacial burial hypothesis andthe changes in terrestrial carbon pools over the stages ofa glacial-interglacial cycle. Arrows indicate the directionof land-atmospheric carbon flux; reddish brown representssoil carbon; green trees represent vegetation carbon. Landcarbon accumulated during glaciation due to glacial advance, sea level lowering, and climate change is releasedinto the atmosphere at the ensuing deglaciation, contributing to the increase in atmospheric CO2 . The ocean dampsthe land flux, in addition to other active changes such asocean temperature change.

680ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCESvegetation and soil organic matter is disturbed anddecomposed at an early stage, therefore little carbon is buried under the ice sheets at glacial maximum. While one cannot exclude this mechanism in destroying some carbon, especially the episodically fastmoving ice streams at the front range of a matureice sheet (MacAyeal, 1993), this ‘bulldozer’ scenariois unlikely during continental-scale ice sheet inceptionbecause ice sheet movement becomes significant onlyat large thickness. Instead, the terrestrial carbon iscooled and buried slowly after the point when summerheating fails to melt away winter snow. The bottomline is that, regardless of the exact timing of the decomposition, terrestrial carbon needs to be accountedfor in the regions where ice sheets come and go.In summary, the deglaciation atmospheric CO2 increase depends on the interplay of a number of mechanisms on multiple timescales in a transient fashion.After ocean uptake, land carbon release alone maycontribute somewhere between 15 and 45 ppmv to theatmospheric CO2 increase, thus paving the way forexplaining the remaining CO2 increase by other oceanbased mechanisms.Besides the need for including glacial burial carbon and delayed regrowth, recent progress in terrestrial carbon research also demands a reassessment ofthe climate sensitivity of the terrestrial biosphere. Forinstance, the reduced productivity due to lower glacialCO2 level may not be as strong as represented in manymodels as the CO2 fertilization effect may have beenoverestimated on a global scale (Field, 2001). The generally colder glacial climate would have decreased soilrespiration loss without necessarily increasing vegetation biomass or changing vegetation types, thus leaving more carbon on land. This is an important process not accounted for by paleoecological estimates andsome models. On the other hand, colder and drier climate leads to less favorable growing conditions in highmountains and the arctic regions. These competing effects need to be addressed quantitatively.Research in the past has typically viewed theglacial CO2 problem as a static problem with two nearequilibrium states: glacial and interglacial. The current theory emphasizes its time-dependent nature. Ofparticular importance are: the burial and delayed release of terrestrial carbon by ice sheets; the changeof vegetation and soil carbon as climate and sea levelchange during the glacial-interglacial cycles; and thecapacity and multiple timescales in ocean and sediment chemistry in buffering atmospheric CO2 , as wellas other active oceanic mechanisms. These details arestudied in a global carbon cycle model with a focus onVOL. 20the 100-kyr cycle.3. A coupled atmosphere-land-ocean carbonmodelSince the atmospheric mixing time is much shorterthan the glacial timescales, a box atmosphere carbonmodel is used to couple the terrestrial and ocean carbon models (see Appendix). In the coupled system,the terrestrial carbon influences ocean and atmospherein that any imbalance in the land carbon budget isreleased into the atmosphere and the change in atmospheric CO2 partial pressure then causes ocean andsediment adjustment.As a basis for understanding the time evolutionover glacial-interglacial cycles, Fig. 3 shows the climatology simulated by the terrestrial carbon modelat equilibrium interglacial. The Net Primary Production (NPP) and vegetation carbon (wood, root, andleaf) are dominated by tropical, temperate, and borealforests, largely in accordance with precipitation distribution and low maintenance requirement at colderregions. However, soil carbon is smaller in the tropicsthan at high latitudes because of the fast decomposition at high temperature in the tropics. As a result,the total carbon (vegetation soil) per unit area hassimilar magnitude at tropical and high latitude moistregions, but northern mid-high latitudes dominate thetotal budget because of the large continental area. Theglobal land total carbon pool is 1651 Gt, with 903Gt in the soil and 748 Gt in the vegetation biomass.These are within the uncertainties of estimates of thepresent-day carbon budget (Schlesinger, 1991). It isnot entirely satisfactory to use modern climate andcarbon pool size for the interglacial period, but therelatively small variations within an interglacial period such as the Holocene period are not scrutinizedhere because the goal is to explain the much largerglacial-interglacial CO2 change also applicable to earlier glacial cycles. Also note that this equilibrium interglacial is not the same as the transient interglacialdiscussed below.To simulate the time-dependent glacial-interglacialcycles, the terrestrial carbon model is forced by the following climate boundary conditions during deglaciation: ice cover and topography from 21 to 6 kBP(thousands of years before present) at 1-kyr intervals(Peltier, 1994), and simulated climate (precipitationand surface temperature) of the NCAR CommunityClimate Model (CCM1) (Kutzbach et al., 1998) for thetime slices 21, 16, 14, 11, and 6 kBP. In order to avoidbias in the CCM1 simulation, anomalies for precipitation and temperature are computed relative to its control simulation. These anomalies are then added to a

NO. 5NING ZENGmodern observed climatology (New et al., 1999) to obtain the full values. The ice data are linearly interpolated at a time interval of 10 years while precipitationand temperature are interpolated monthly. To betterrepresent the carbon fertilization effect, the CO2 usedin the vegetation photosynthesis module (CO2v) takesa value of 200 ppmv at glacial maximum and 280 ppmvat the interglacial with linear interpolation in between.Otherwise, using the modeled CO2 would add unnecessary uncertainty. The terrestrial model was run at2.5 2.5 horizontal resolution at a monthly time stepto resolve the seasonal cycle.The details of ice sheet inception and climatechange during glaciation are not well constrained. Precipitation, temperature, and CO2v were simply inter-681polated linearly using the data of the Holocene maximum (6 kBP) and the LGM (21 kBP), because thefocus here is the 100 kyr cycle, not the sub-100-kyrvariations. An ‘inverse deglaciation’ technique is usedfor the ice data such that a place with earlier (later)deglaciation would glaciate later (earlier). The averages of these forcings over land are shown in Fig. 4a,b.The ocean carbon model was forced by interglacialoceanic circulation, temperature, and salinity. Theseconditions stay fixed throughout the model run (except for a sensitivity experiment) so ocean acts as apassive buffer because the focus here is on land. Theocean model was run at a yearly time step.Fig. 3. Model simulated land Net Primary Production NPP (kg m 2 yr 1 ) and carbon pools (kg m 2 ) forequilibrium interglacial condition (not identical to a transient interglacial which includes glacial burial carbondecomposition and regrowth uptake). fvWHwN F7 9-V / !- 97k- 0!7yx Q Qz*,.W n { ( t{ } 5M 0 7k " 0k \ - *,.W i { ( 5M J 89 W ! - ! # ! 0D " # - " -] O 0!7 0 * 0 A 7 90\ " - # 0! 90D I 10D " -1 " - dI ! 1 # N 0 "- !7 9 - " 1 - # 1 - " 0

682ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCESVOL. 20Fig. 4. Climate forcings (a-b) and model simulation (c-h) over glacial-interglacial cycles: (a) Temperature(black line, labeled on the left in Celsius) and precipitation (green, labeled on the right in mm d 1 ) averagedover land; (b) Ice covered area as percentage of world total (black), CO2 used in vegetation photosynthesis(green); (c) Simulated atmospheric CO2 concentration; (d) Net carbon flux from land to atmosphere; (e) Total(green)carbon;burial land B (black) % -1 :and N active, # " biospheric0 i* r ;5q 0!7 F7 9- (f) /Glacial !- 0 * b ;carbon58 @3 " f(black) -1 " and-a b 0\submerged " - " -Icarbon O W "- 9 9on D5continental shelves at rising sea level (green); (g) Carbon stored in soil (black) and vegetation biomass (green);sY9 (h)" # Net ! primaryj*, t- . -1 0 2 - 9- 97 0y - " , 4 0 %V9- 1 ! 5) 0!7k ! 9 " 0o*, "90 2u- 9- 97 0k !production. Vertical lines mark two interglacials (year 15k, 115k) and a glacial maximum # \ (year 0 :100k). 7 { Labeled} 5[ 93 " in 97(a)f @are3 " &the- 0 different7 PD ;5uXT OstagesA O e3 " of 97afGI cycle9 / defined " # O90\in the ) text. ]dV An #- 7:increase - *,of -130 .!ppmv5 2t%&')(500 ! 97 atmospheric 0 3 " " CO 0 2 at deglaciation F0\ 9 (c) f*,is the"90tdirect5 P @58result F / !- of about97k Gt " carbon %I')released(: O 0! Ofrom90\ # land 0 (e)P?7tin5MaxI" " scenario 0 g Fh in , which - ocean0!7p acts :only as " a PpassiveYe5Is6 buffer. - - 0!7 *, -1 .!5I 0 7i O 3 !" # q*, "90;5A " 0 P 54 )-1 " -[ t # - " 0m*, - #. 5 0!7y " # 97 " 0k 0k O 0\ 0 90\ - 9- 3 9 / 4 0 p 9 p- "3 9*, "90t5 P \56% 0M 97/ 0M - *, - #. 5] 0!7M3 " " 08 : *, "90t5 PD t5 xI" 6 ! # : # ! # W7! O 0 RL " " - - 0!9 : #.: bdV : 0\ " - " - *, 9 9 r.;2] 9 B r.!5V 0!7 4 -1 " - : rhF 1 4 ! *, 9 "E E .!5 R[l6 ;9- 97 0 * D5 #I I7 a ;" #90D [ 9 [ / )X O F "- I7!" 0 97: 0: & OhF "R[c 0q 0! O 9 I Yv EM ! 438 " %&')( :7 " - " 0 * @5/ 8 ! 7 9 O / 9 !- / : E E A : " # ; 0y 9- 9 97 J # - 0!7m*,e5/ 0

NO. 5NING ZENG4. Glacial-interglacial cycle as a transient phenomenonThe coupled model forced by the above climateboundary conditions is first brought to an interglacialequilibrium for 5 kyr. It then runs through twoglaciation-deglaciation cycles, plus an additional 15kyr of glaciation. Each glaciation lasts 85 kyr

glacial carbon cycle change is a 170-Gt increase in the atmosphere, a 500-Gt increase on land, and a 670-Gt decrease in the ocean and sediments (e.g., Sundquist, 1993; Sigman and Boyle, 2000). The terrestrial biosphere has been thought to store less carbon at glacial times because the drier, colder, and low CO 2 glacial climate is less .

Related Documents:

Dating glacial landforms. Applying geochronological tools (e.g., relative- and absolute-dating methods, etc.) to glacial landforms (e.g., moraines) to yield the timing of past glaciation (Moraine and Glacial Geomorphology and Landforms Evolution). Introduction Ever since scientists first recognized that glaciers and ice

Madan, Meena, Prothero, Donald R., and Syverson, Valerie J.P. 2019. Stasis in the smaller owls from Rancho La Brea during the last glacial-interglacial climate change.

longer than the human lifespan and even human civilizations (Milan-kovitch 1930). These are in large part responsible for both the glacial periods during which large regions at high and middle latitudes are cov-ered by thick ice sheets, and the warm interglacial periods such as the present Holocene epoch, which began about 10,000 years ago (Croll

OVERVIEW OF GLACIERS, GLACIAL LAKES, AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES This section presents lessons learned by Peruvian engineers who worked for more than 70 years on glacial lake management methods, mostly in Peru’s highest mountain range, the Cordillera Blanca. 3.1. PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT

The Glacial Budget Accumulation and Wastage Glacial budget- A glacier's behavior depends on the balance between accumulation and wastage (melting). A valley glacier with a balanced budgetwill deposit a terminaldeposit a terminal moraine at its base. If it has a negative budget a recessional moraine may develop. Fig. 14.7 a-b, p. 366 The Glacial .

coastlines have been greatly affected by glacial pro-cesses. Major fjords, some of them extending to water depths of over 1km, punctuate the coastlines of west-ern North America, New Zealand and Norway. We will discuss these features and the glacial erosion processes that lead to their formation. It is the variation in the extent of .

14)Pure acetic acid (HC2H3O2) is a liquid and is known as glacial acetic acid. Calculate the molarity of a solution prepared by dissolving 15.00 mL of glacial acetic acid at 25eC in sufficient water to give 500.0 mL of solution. The density of glacial acetic acid at 25eC is 1.049 g/mL. A)1.89 103 B)31.5 C)0.525 D)5.25 10-4 E)0.0315

2 CHAPTER1. INTRODUCTION 1.1.3 Differences between financial ac-countancy and management ac-counting Management accounting information differs from