DRAFT UGANDA STANDARD - Global Trade

3y ago
77 Views
5 Downloads
533.55 KB
14 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aarya Seiber
Transcription

DUS 365DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDSecond Edition2018-mm-ddPowdered (icing) sugar — SpecificationReference numberDUS 365: 2018 UNBS 2018

DUS 365: 2018Compliance with this standard does not, of itself confer immunity from legal obligationsA Uganda Standard does not purport to include all necessary provisions of a contract. Users areresponsible for its correct application UNBS 2018All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilised in anyform or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without prior writtenpermission from UNBS.Requests for permission to reproduce this document should be addressed toThe Executive DirectorUganda National Bureau of StandardsP.O. Box 6329KampalaUgandaTel: 256 414 333 250/1/2/3Fax: 256 414 286 123E-mail: info@unbs.go.ugWeb: www.unbs.go.ugii UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved

DUS 365:2018ContentsPageForeword . iv1Scope . 12Normative references . 13Terms and definitions . 244.14.2Quality Factors . 2General quality requirements . 2Physical and chemical characteristics. 25Food Additives . 366.16.2Contaminants . 3Heavy metals . 3Pesticide Residues . 377.2Hygiene . 4Specific requirements . 48Packaging . 49Labelling . 41010.1Sampling . 5Method of Analysis . eparation of Test Samples . 5Determination of Polarization . 5Determination of Invert Sugar content . 5Determination of Conductivity Ash . 5Determination of Loss on Drying . 5Determination of Colour . 6Determination of Sulphur dioxide . 6Determination of Arsenic . 6Determination of Copper . 6Determination of Lead. 6Determination of Pesticide Residues . 6Bibliography . 7 UNBS 2018 – All rights reservediii

DUS 365: 2018ForewordUganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) is a parastatal under the Ministry of Trade, Industry andCooperatives established under Cap 327, of the Laws of Uganda, as amended. UNBS is mandated to coordinate the elaboration of standards and is(a) a member of International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) and(b) a contact point for the WHO/FAO Codex Alimentarius Commission on Food Standards, and(c) the National Enquiry Point on TBT Agreement of the World Trade Organisation (WTO).The work of preparing Uganda Standards is carried out through Technical Committees. A TechnicalCommittee is established to deliberate on standards in a given field or area and consists of key stakeholdersincluding government, academia, consumer groups, private sector and other interested parties.Draft Uganda Standards adopted by the Technical Committee are widely circulated to stakeholders and thegeneral public for comments. The committee reviews the comments before recommending the draft standardsfor approval and declaration as Uganda Standards by the National Standards Council.The committee responsible for this document Technical Committee UNBS/TC 2, [Food and Agriculture],Subcommittee SC 11, [Sugar, edible starches and related confectionery products].This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (US 365:2002), which has been technically revised.iv UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved

DRAFT UGANDA STANDARDDUS 365: 2018Powdered (icing) sugar — Specification1ScopeThis Draft Uganda Standard specifies, requirements, method of test and sampling for white powdered (icing)sugar intended for use in toppings, icings and other sugar content bakery products.2Normative referencesThe following referenced documents referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their contentconstitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undatedAOAC Official Method 967.26 Salmonella in Processed Foods DetectionICUMSA Method GS 2/3-1,The Braunschweig Method for the Polarisation of White Sugar by PolarimetryICUMSA Method GS 2/9-6, The Determination of Reducing Sugars in White Sugar by Modified Ofner MethodICUMSA Method GS 2/1/3/9-15, The Determination of Sugar Moisture by Loss on DryingICUMSA Method GS 2/3-10, The Determination of White Sugar Solution ColourICUMSA Method GS 2/3-17, The Determination of Conductivity Ash in Refined Sugar ProductsICUMSA Method GS 2/3/9-5, The Determination of Reducing Sugars in Purified Sugars by the Knight andAllen EDTA MethodICUMSA Method GS 2/3/9-19, The Determination of Insoluble Matter in White Sugar by Membrane FiltrationUS 28, Code of practice for hygiene in the food and drink manufacturing industryUS 45, General standard for food additivesUS 1659, Materials in contact with food — Requirements for packaging materialsUS CAC/GL 50, General guidelines on samplingUS EAS 5, Refined white sugar — SpecificationUS EAS 38, Labelling of pre-packaged foods — General requirementsUS ISO 2447, Fruit and vegetable Products — Determination of tin contentUS ISO 6633, Fruit and vegetables products — Determination of lead content – Flameless atomic absorptionspectrometric methodUS ISO 6634, Fruit, vegetables and derived products — Determination of arsenic content — Silverdiethyldithiocarbamate spectrophotometric method UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved1

US ISO 6637, Fruits, vegetables and derived products — Determination of mercury content — Flamelessatomic absorption methodUS ISO 6888-1, Microbiology of food and animal feeds — Horizontal method for enumeration of Coagulasepositive staphylococci. (Staphylococcus aureus and other species), Detection and MPN technique for lownumbersUS ISO 21527-2, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the enumeration ofyeasts and moulds — Part 2: Colony count technique in products with water activity less than or equal to 0.95US ISO 4833-1, Microbiology of the food chain – Horizontal method for the enumeration of microorganisms –Part 1: Colony count at 30 C by the pour plate techniqueUS ISO 4831, Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs — Horizontal method for the detection andenumeration of coliforms — Most probable number technique3Terms and definitionsFor the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.3.1Powdered (icing) sugarfinely pulverised refined white sugar with or without the addition of an anticaking agent4Quality Factors4.1General quality requirementsPowdered (icing) sugar shall be;a) Processed from refined white sugar that conforms with US EAS 5b) micro-crystalline free-flowing powder;c) white in colour;d) free from dirt or other extraneous matter; ande)4.2free from foreign odour and tastePhysical and chemical characteristicsThe product shall conform to the requirements in Table 1.Table 1— Physical and chemical characteristics for powdered (Icing) sugarS/NComposition and quality factorLimitTest methodsi)Polarisation, ⁰Z, min.99.7ICUMSA Method GS 2/3-1ii)Invert Sugar content, % by mass, max.0.04ICUMSA Method GS 2/3/9-5ICUMSA Method GS 2/9-62iii)Starch content, % by mass, max.5ICUMSA Method GS 2/9-6,iv)Conductivity ash, % by mass, max.0.04ICUMSA Method GS 2/3-17 UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved

DUS 365: 20185v)Loss on drying, (3 hours at 105 ⁰C), %, by mass, max.0.05ICUMSA Method GS 2/1/3/9-15Vi)Colour (ICUMSA units), max.60ICUMSA Method GS 2/3-10vii)Impurity undissolved in water, mg/kg, max.30ICUMSA Method GS 2/3-19Food Additives5.1 The additives used shall be in accordance with US 45, The maximum permitted sulphur dioxide levelshall be 15 mg/kg.5.2 Anticaking agentsThe following anticaking agents are permitted for use in powdered white (Icing) sugar to a maximum level of1.5% by m/m), singly or in combination, provided that starch is not present:a) calcium phosphate, tribasicb) magnesium carbonatec) magnesium stearated) silicon dioxide, amorphous (dehydrated silica gel)e) calcium silicatef)magnesium trisilicateg) sodium calcium aluminosilicate66.1ContaminantsHeavy metalsThe maximum permitted levels for heavy metals are set out below as in Table 2:Table 2 — Maximum levels of the heavy metal limitsS/N6.2Heavy metalLimit (maximum)Test methodsi)Arsenic (As)1 mg/kgUS ISO 6634ii)Copper (Cu)2 mg/kgUS ISO 2447iii)Lead (Pb)0.5 mg/kgUS ISO 6633iv)Mercury (Hg)0.05 mg/kgUS ISO 6637Pesticide ResiduesThe product shall comply with those maximum residue limits established by the FAO/WHO Codex Committeeon Pesticide Residues. UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved3

7HygieneThe product covered by the provisions of this standard shall be prepared in accordance with the appropriatesections of US 28.7.2Specific requirementsThe product shall conform to the microbiological limits in Table 3.Table 3 — Maximum microbial levels in powdered (icing) sugarS/N8Microbiological parameterLimiti)Total Plate Count (mesophilic), CFU/g, max.103US ISO 4833-1vi)Yeast and moulds, CFU/g, max.50US ISO 21527-2vii)Total coliform, MPN/g 1US ISO 4831viii)Salmonella, per gnegativeAOAC 967:26v)Staphylococcus aureus, per gabsentTest MethodsUS ISO 6888-1PackagingThe packaging material used shall be new, clean and shall protect the powdered icing sugar fromcontamination and wetting. The packing material shall be food grade and comply with US 1659:2017.9LabellingIn addition to the relevant sections of the Uganda Standard Specification for the labelling of pre-packagedFoods US EAS 38, the following specific provisions shall apply:a) The name of the product ‘’powdered (icing) sugar’’b) List of ingredientsc) Net contents: The net contents shall be declared by weight in metric units ('system international')d) Name and Address of the manufacturer, packer, distributor, importer, exporter or vendor of theproduct shall be declared.e) Country of Originf)Lot /batch identification;g) Shelf life: best before/use by date;h) Statement ‘Food for Human Consumption’ shall appear on the package;i)Storage conditions as “Store in a cool dry place away from contaminants’’j)Instructions on disposal of used package;k) Each container may also be marked with a Certification Markl)4Packing date. UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved

DUS 365: 2018m) Instruction for usen) Declaration the use of Sulphur dioxide10 SamplingSampling shall be carried out in accordance with US CAC/GL 50.10.1 Method of AnalysisFrom a given lot a sample of packages shall be randomly selected as per Table 4.Table 4 — Given lots of samples per the number of selected packagesTable 1 Lot SizeNumber of Packages to be selectedUp to 1004101 to 5005501 to 100071001 to above1010.2 Preparation of Test SamplesThe contents of the packages selected as per 10.2 shall be thoroughly mixed, and by a process of quarteringthe sample shall be reduced to about 500 g for testing.The test sample shall be immediately transferred to a tightly closed, moisture proof container for testingpurpose.10.3 Determination of PolarizationAccording to the ICUMSA method (ICUMSA methods of Sugar Analysis, 1979, p23 and p182). Results shallbe expressed in degrees Sugar, oZ.10.4 Determination of Invert Sugar contentAccording to the Berlin Institute method (ICUMSA methods of Sugar Analysis, 1979, p55) Results shall beexpressed as % m/m invert sugar.10.5 Determination of Conductivity AshAccording to the Codex Alimentarius Methods of Analysis for sugars, CAC/RMS - 1969 or according to theofficial conductivity ash determination method (ICUMSA Methods of Sugar Analysis, 1979, p85). Results shallbe expressed as % m/m Conductivity Ash.10.6 Determination of Loss on DryingAccording to the Method of the British National Committee of ICUMSA is applicable to white sugar (ICUMSAmethods of sugar analysis, 1979, p113). Results shall be expressed as % m/m loss on drying. UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved5

10.7 Determination of ColourThe visual appearance of plantation (mill) sugar shall be determined according to the Codex Alimentariusmethods of Analysis for sugars, CAC/RM 6 or according to the ICUMSA method (ICUMSA Methods of SugarAnalysis 1979, p125) or by the photoelectric reflectant method and shall meet requirements of Clause 4.510.8 Determination of Sulphur dioxideAccording to the method of Carruthers, Heaney and Oldfield which is based on the calorimetric determinationof SO2 and is applicable to white sugars (ICUMSA Methods of Sugar Analysis 1979, p98). Results shall beexpressed as Mg, SO2/kg.10.9 Determination of ArsenicAccording to the calorimetric (silver diethyldithiocarbamate) method of the Association of Official AnalyticalChemists, Official Methods - AOAC, 1990 952.13 or According to the ICUMSA method (ICUMSA methods ofSugar Analysis 1979, p100). Results shall be expressed as mg, Arsenic/kg.10.10 Determination of CopperAccording to AOAC (1990) 971.20 or the ICUMSA method (ICUMSA methods of Sugar Analysis 1979, p90).Results shall be expressed as mg, copper/kg.10.11 Determination of LeadAccording to the ICUMSA 'wet ashing' method (ICUMSA methods of Sugar Analysis, 1979, p91). Results shallbe expressed as mg lead/kg.10.12 Determination of Pesticide ResiduesThe pesticide residues shall be determined according to AOAC methods of analysis for pesticides. (970.52,985.22, and 970.53 of 1990).6 UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved

DUS 365: 2018Bibliography[1]CODEX STAN 212: 1999, Codex standards for sugars.[2]KS 05 –38:1977 (Second revision 1986) Kenya standards specification for white sugar[3]US 365:2002 Specification for powdered (icing) sugar UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved7

DUS 365: 2018Certification markingProducts that conform to Uganda standards may be marked with Uganda National Bureau of Standards(UNBS) Certification Mark shown in the figure below.The use of the UNBS Certification Mark is governed by the Standards Act, and the Regulations madethereunder. This mark can be used only by those licensed under the certification mark scheme operated bythe Uganda National Bureau of Standards and in conjunction with the relevant Uganda Standard. Thepresence of this mark on a product or in relation to a product is an assurance that the goods comply with therequirements of that standard under a system of supervision, control and testing in accordance with thecertification mark scheme of the Uganda National Bureau of Standards. UNBS marked products arecontinually checked by UNBS for conformity to that standard.Further particulars of the terms and conditions of licensing may be obtained from the Director, UgandaNational Bureau of Standards. UNBS 2018 – All rights reserved9

DUS 365: 2018ICS 67.180.10Price based on nn pages UNBS 2018– All rights reserved

According to the ICUMSA method (ICUMSA methods of Sugar Analysis, 1979, p23 and p182). Results shall be expressed in degrees Sugar, oZ. 10.4 Determination of Invert Sugar content According to the Berlin Institute method (ICUMSA methods of Sugar Analysis, 1979, p55) Results shall be expressed as % m/m invert sugar.

Related Documents:

tal and Evangelical Churches in Uganda, the Seventh-day Adventist Uganda Union and the Born Again Faith in Uganda. The Uganda Muslim Supreme Council (UMSC) is the mother organization and governing body of all Muslims in Uganda. All of these religious organizations belong to the Interreligi

UIA Uganda Investment Authority UMA Uganda manufactures Association USA United States of America USDI Uganda Society for Spatial Data Infrastructure (previous initiative - now defunct) UTL Uganda Telecom Limited UWA Uganda Wildlife Authority VoIP Voice over Internet Protocol

Uganda, Africa 'Uganda is the . EMERGENCY CONTACT DETAILS FOR CLASSIC AFRICA SAFARIS IN UGANDA: Ms. Hilda Komugisha, Office Manager: (256) (0) 77 2642 527 Mr. Mel Gormley, Country Director: (256) (0) 77 2642 185 Tel: (256) (0) 41 4320121 (Open during local office hours) Uganda country code: 256 . 3

2. Describe how Ugandan Health care System is organized 3. Outline facts and figures of health care in Uganda 4. Describe the major health sector reforms 5. Outline major roles of rehabilitative health care in Uganda. 6. Describe the role of Government in CBR 7. List Uganda’s achieveme

Goals (SDGs); and a way forward is proposed to integrate Uganda’s unfinished MDG business into the national post-2015 development agenda. Uganda’s MDG results Uganda’s overall MDG results are impressive, although progress has not been uniform across all the goals. Excluding the

Dec 10, 2020 · LIST OF AUTHORISED RADIO BROADCASTERS IN UGANDA The Uganda Communication Commission (the Commission) was established under section 4 of the Uganda Communications Act, 2013 (the Act) as the

west coast charters (santa ana, ca) united states west coast wcc x-jet gmbh austria -- xje modifications from/ to company country telephony 3-ltr from aerolink uganda limited uganda - xau to aerolink uganda limited uganda pearl xau from aeromonky, s.a. de c.v. mexico - nky to aeromonky, s.a. de c.v. mexico aeromon nky

The top five reasons to export to Uganda include: o A free-market economy, with few limits on foreign investment and repatriation of funds. o A rapidly growing consumer demographic, with 50 percent of Uganda’s population under the age of 15. o Uganda is increasing its connect