The City Of Canterbury - Ipart.nsw.gov.au

3y ago
5 Views
3 Downloads
1.64 MB
58 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Kamden Hassan
Transcription

The City of CanterburyImprovement ProposalIMPROVEMENT PROPOSALJune 20151The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity

This Page Intentionally Left Blank

ContentsExecutive Summary51 Introduction72 Social and Community Context82.1 City of Canterbury2.2 Canterbury City Council2.3 Our Journey So Far2.4 SWOT3 Merge or Improve?9101214163.1 Community Engagement3.2 Merger Opportunities17204 Are We Fit for the Future?224.1 City of Canterbury4.2 Canterbury and St George4.3 Canterbury and Bankstown5 Improvement Plan5.1 Objectives and Strategies5.2 Action Plan5.3 Implementing the Action PlanAttachments2342515253565758The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity3

IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALWe support Local Governmentreform, but oppose‘forced amalgamations’.4

Executive SummaryThe City of Canterbury is committed to local government reform. We have been active participants inthe local government reform process which commenced with the Destination 2036 meeting in Dubboin 2011.The Independent Local Government Review Panel (ILGRP) provided the following recommendationsfor the City of Canterbury: Amalgamate with Hurstville, Kogarah and Rockdale; or Combine as a strong Joint Organisation including Sutherland; or An alternative for Canterbury could be to amalgamate with Bankstown.Council signalled its preferred position by way of a resolution, stating its position is to continue itsstand-alone existence and that if an amalgamation is the only available option this should be pursuedwith one or more of the St George councils, not Bankstown.In the spirit of the reform agenda, we have consulted extensively with our community on all possibleoptions, and have undertaken detailed assessments of all of the recommendations of the ILGRP,including a stand-alone option.Our assessment has indicated we are Fit for the Future and will meet all ofthe criteria by 2021.We have pursued merger options with all our potential merger partners, and taken a lead rolein regional collaboration to explore the potential for Joint Organisations. Despite these efforts,Bankstown, Hurstville, Kogarah and Rockdale councils have all resolved to stand alone, leaving uswith no option but to submit an Improvement Proposal for the City of Canterbury to stand alone.Detailed internal analysis, independently verified by consultants Morrison Low, shows that ourproposal to stand alone is superior to either of the merger options in meeting the Fit for the Futurecriteria.Our proposal to stand alone is consistent with the preference expressed by our community, asoutlined in the outcomes from an extensive community consultation process.Standing alone the City of Canterbury will meet the Fit for the Futurecriteria. By any measure, a stand-alone option for the City of Canterbury isthe preferred option and is demonstrably superior to the other options.We are in a strong position and ready to take a lead role in any future council merger plans proposedby the NSW Government.The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity5

Canterbury: Fit for the FutureIMPROVEMENT PROPOSALWe are willing to merge butto date our neighbours haverejected a merger. This meantour only option was to lodgea stand-alone submission.6

1. IntroductionFit for the Future is the NSW Government’sresponse to the recommendations of theIndependent Local Government Review Panel(ILGRP). The Fit for the Future program is aboutenabling each council to create its own roadmapof how it will become sustainable in the contextof their local community. A Fit for the Futurecouncil is one that is: sustainable; efficient;effectively manages infrastructure and deliversservices for communities; has the scale andcapacity to engage effectively across community,industry and government.As a consequence the NSW Government hasasked all NSW local councils to prepare asubmission outlining how they are or will becomeFit for the Future. The submission must be lodgedwith the Independent Pricing and RegulatoryTribunal (IPART) by 30 June 2015.not outline a rationale for this. The ILGRP alsorecommended exploring the potential for a JointOrganisation with the St George Councils.Our assessment indicates we are Fit for theFuture and will meet all of the criteria by 2021.However consistent with our commitment to thelocal government reform process we explored allthe options recommended by the ILGRP. We havepursued merger options with all our potentialmerger partners, and taken a lead role in regionalcollaboration to explore the potential for JointOrganisations. Despite these efforts, Bankstown,Hurstville, Kogarah and Rockdale councils have allresolved to stand alone, leaving us with no optionbut to submit an Improvement Proposal for theCity of Canterbury also to stand alone.This Improvement Proposal outlines how weA key feature of a Fit for the Future council is scale are Fit for the Future. It describes our effortsand capacity. The NSW Government considersand demonstrates our willingness to explorethis to mean adopting the recommendationsthe merger options recommended by thefor council mergers made by the ILGRP. TheILGRP, outlines the results of our communitypreferred option of the ILGRP for the City ofengagement, details the analysis we and ourCanterbury is to amalgamate with the St Georgeconsultants Morrison Low have undertakencouncils (Hurstville, Kogarah and Rockdale),by our own staff to determine our position into achieve a projected population by 2031 ofrelation to the Fit for the Future criteria, and491,500. The ILGRP’s rationale for this preference includes an Improvement Plan to ensure wewas: the close functional interaction betweencontinue to rise to the challenge to be a fit leaderthe councils, existing economic and social links,of our community well into the future.and the need for unified local government tosupport community development, planning andmanagement of the major centres, foreshoresand the overall development of the area. TheILGRP suggested an alternative for Canterburycould be to amalgamate with Bankstown, but didThe City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity7

Social and CommunityContextThe City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity8

2.1 City of CanterburyLocated just 17 kilometres south-west of theSydney CBD, the City of Canterbury is known forits many diverse cultures, friendly people, exoticfoods, great restaurants, and unique shoppingexperiences. There are scenic parks, historicalsites, and an extensive range of sportingand recreational facilities - Canterbury ParkRacecourse, Belmore Sportsground, and MorrisIemma Indoor Sports Centre just to name a few.With an area of 34 square kilometres, the largelyresidential City has 17 suburbs including openspace corridors surrounding the Cooks River inthe north-east, Wolli Creek in the south, and SaltPan Creek in the west.Originally inhabited by Aboriginal communitiesfrom the Bediagal people of the Dharug nation,the City of Canterbury now has a very culturallydiverse population with residents from over150 different countries. Almost half were bornoverseas - 45% in countries where English is notthe first language, and 64% speak a languageother than English at home. The City has a veryhigh population density with almost 152,000residents living mostly in houses and two- orthree-storey units.There are excellent public transport and roadnetworks throughout the area. Major retailprecincts include town centres in Belmore,Campsie, Earlwood, Lakemba and Punchbowl,and Roselands Shopping Centre. There aresmaller centres in Belfield, Canterbury, HurlstonePark, Narwee, and Wiley Park. Major industrialprecincts include Canterbury, Kingsgrove Northand Riverwood. Canterbury Hospital is alsoa focus for associated medical facilities andservices. The City is geographically well placed,close to services, and major transport linksincluding the M5 motorway, King Georges andCanterbury Roads, freight rail lines, Port Botanyand Sydney airport. The Sydney CBD is just ashort drive or train ride away.The City is growing. After a decline in populationin the five years to 2006, the population hasgrown by almost 10,000 in the five years to2011, at an average of 1.3% per year. By 2023the population is forecast to grow to at least157,000, and to 178,500 by 2031. Higher densitynow proposed in the Sydenham- Bankstown Railcorridor could result in the population reaching200,000 by 2031. This will require a significantincrease in the number of dwellings and jobsin the City. Canterbury also has the highestpopulation density of any NSW local council over100,000 residents.Canterbury’s built environment is characterisedby a high quantity of residential land, andsome industrial areas on the perimeter of thecouncil area. A number of older residentialareas have the potential for redevelopment toaccommodate population and housing growth.Canterbury Road has also been identified as aPotential Enterprise Corridor, and an importantlocal employment focus.The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity9

2.2 Canterbury City CouncilCanterbury City Council is responsible to itscommunity through the Community StrategicPlan to achieve real improvements in the qualityof life for people living and working here. It isled by a popularly elected mayor supported by9 councillors elected in three wards. With anannual expenditure of 110 million, council isresponsible for a wide range of services andinfrastructure including roads, communityfacilities, libraries, parks, garbage removal,urban planning, and development.IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALWe maintain 27 sports grounds, 95 playgrounds, 217 passive open spaces, 114 drainagereserves and 4 bushland reserves. A highlight isthe Riverwood Wetlands, an area which since2004 has been totally transformed from anold and under-used paddock into a popularrecreation site for people of all ages. Works haveincluded construction of wetlands, walkwaysand cycleways around an ornamental pond,landscaping and gardening, a new car park,additional automatic toilets and communitygardens.10We are proud of our waterways, and have a builta cycleway along the Cooks River for peopleto discover the natural beauty of our City. Inaddition to having a large range of recreationand leisure facilities, we cater for the diverserange of people and cultures that make up ourcommunity, with dedicated services for the aged,children and youth. We also offer a wide rangeof multicultural services and facilities forour culturally diverse community. We provideservices to children including Family Day Care,four Early Learning Centres and an OccasionalCare service. We have a central library inCampsie, and three branch libraries in Earlwood,Lakemba and Riverwood, with 140,000 itemsavailable for loan including 26,000 in otherlanguages.Our waste and recycling system includescollection of rubbish, recycling and gardenvegetation, and has been significant in reducingthe amount of rubbish sent to landfill. In additionthe amount of materials collected in our City forre-use has virtually doubled since 2002. Council,like many of its counterparts, is also investigatingAlternative Waste Technologies for the future ofwaste management in our City.

Punchbowl Community CentreCampsie LibraryAquatic and Fitness Centre - Tasker ParkOur major facilities include:Aquatic and Fitness Centres at Roselands and at Tasker Park, Canterbury Belmore Sports Ground, and Morris Iemma Indoor Sports Centre Canterbury Golf Course at Kingsgrove (9 hole) Wiley Park Amphitheatre Belmore Youth Resource Centre Early Learning Centres at Earlwood, Hurlstone Park, Lakemba and PunchbowlLibraries at Campsie, Earlwood, Lakemba and Riverwood. Punchbowl Multipurpose Centre Community Centres - Canterbury City Community Centre, Earlwood Caring Community Centre, Riverwood Community Centre, six SeniorCitizens Centres and The Carrington Centre.The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity11

2.3 Our Journey So FarWe have effectively managed our infrastructureand delivered services in a financially sustainablemanner for many years. Our Roads andFootpaths Levy which ran for five years up to2005 provided additional funds for road andfootpath infrastructure renewal. In 2004-05this was replaced by a 15 year InfrastructureRenewal Levy, also securing additional fundingfor infrastructure renewal.IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALSince 2008 we have put a very strong emphasison strategic financial planning, robust financialmanagement, and efficiency. Through ourService Review Program, which commencedin 2008, we have worked hard to manage ourexpenses, and maximise revenue in recentyears. Reviews of specific services haveincluded childrens’ centres; library operations;aquatic centres; workshop operations; parks andproperty; waste collection; street cleaning; treemaintenance; building cleaning.12In 2011 we undertook a further financialsustainability review, which resulted in theimplementation of additional efficiencies andrevenue opportunities totalling more than 1million per year. Together the Service ReviewProgram and Financial Sustainability Reviewhave achieved savings in employee costs ofmore than 5 million per year alone. Combinedwith our Integrated Planning and ReportingFramework we have consistently met communityexpectations for infrastructure provision andservices whilst achieving significant efficiencies,to the point where we now have the lowest costper capita of any Sydney Metropolitan councilIn 2013-14 we applied for and were successful inreceiving approval for a Special Rate Variation,which has significantly improved our revenuebase. In preparing the application we engagedour community in the 2013 Rates and ServicesReview, which over a period of 12 monthsexplored options for changes in the range andlevel of services, and the means to fund these.The Review aimed to determine the appropriatelevels of service and infrastructure condition;whether or not some services should continueto be provided, and if not, which ones shouldbe discontinued and when; and the level of aincreased revenue through the Special RateVariation our community would be willing toaccept.These initiatives, started well before the Fit forthe Future program was announced, representour long standing commitment to responsiblefinancial management and sustainability as anindependent sphere of government - deliveringquality services in the context of sound financialand asset management. What follows is anevaluation of our performance as we look tobuild on past successes to continue to be Fit forthe Future.

Efficiency of Sydney Metropolitan CouncilsFigure 1: Efficiency ofSydney MetropolitanCouncils (OLGComparative Indicators2012-13).(as measured by OLG Fit for the Future Criteria - Cost Per CapitaSource: OLG Comparative Indicators 2012-13) Ku-ring-gaiStrathfieldHillsRandwickCanada nrithParramattaHunters HillWollondillyLane CovePittwaterBurwoodMarrickvilleCamdenBlue MountainsBotany BayNorth rleySydney 500 1,000Cost Per Capita 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 651 717 723 746 755 760 763 774 778 788 803 803 822 837 846 849 856 872 888 891 895 908 915 965 972 991 1,011 1,135 1,138 1,160 1,180 1,241 1,244 1,275 1,293 1,302 1,305 1,326 1,372 1,614 2,588The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity13

2.4 SWOT Analysis2.4.1 Strengths Excellent access to Sydney CBD, variety of transport networks and services; highly desirablelocation on the edge of Sydney City; high population growth, high level of development.Excellent track record in consistently delivering quality services to a highly diverse communitywith a wide range of services, well established delivery processes, innovative solutions, andcredibility with our community.Highly effective community engagement processes providing a wide range of opportunities foraccess and participation for an extremely diverse community.Qualified, experienced and skilled workforce with a high level of commitment, particularly inassets and financial management, and an experienced leadership team.Leaders in regional cooperation, leading member of SSROC and founding member of SydneyMetropolitan Mayors.Commitment to continuous improvement evidenced by Service Review Programs, and BusinessImprovement Program.Strong focus on financial sustainability and sound financial management.Proven capability to manage and deliver projects on behalf of other levels of government.2.4.2 Opportunities IMPROVEMENT PROPOSAL 14 Capitalise on future expected population growth and higher density; we are reviewing our LEPand DCP to integrate with the Department of Planning’s requirements.Collaboration regionally for sourcing income, reducing costs and delivering projects.Growth in value of property assets, and capacity for rationalisation of property assets togenerate income.Improving the urban environment through urban planning.Further developing community and organisational leadership.Investment and commercial activities to generate revenue.Partnering with the private sector such as PAYCE Communities to deliver new developmentsand services for our City.Improving community engagement through digital technologies.Low debt and ability to capitalise on a low interest environment.

2.4.3 Threats Cost shifting from State and Federal Governments.Loss of direct funding from State and Federal Government.Uncertainty in the economic environment.Potential for disharmony in the community.Climate change and other environmental impacts.2.4.4 Weaknesses Ageing infrastructure.Ability to increase revenue outside property rates is constrained by opportunity andlegislation and low income population.Dispersed locations of staff.Increasing demands and pressure on IT infrastructure.The City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity15

MERGE OR IMPROVE?IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALThis section outlines what we havedone to explore the merger optionsrecommended by the ILGRP,engaging with our community andwith potential merger partnersBankstown and Hurstville, Kogarahand Rockdale councils.16

3.1 Community EngagementAn important part of the exploration and submission process has been extensive engagement andconsultation our local community. A comprehensive community engagement campaign strategywas developed and implemented during February and March 2015, which encompassed a range oftraditional and contemporary digital community engagement methodologies to ensure residentswere provided with information to make an informed decision about their preferences for the future ofour CIty and opportunities to have their voices heard on this matter.3.1.1 Engagement ActivitiesEngagement activities included:Focus Groups with local residents - were held in December 2014 to explore residents’ concerns andpreferences relating to possible merger options for Canterbury. Three focus groups were conducted by anindependent social researcher – one in each Ward across our City. The objective was to have independentanalysis of residents’ concerns and preferences, with the results not influenced by preconceivedassumptions and the results skewed due to a Council presence. Council officers observed the sessionsbut did not participate in the research. A research report on the Focus Group Findings is provided as anattachment.Development of community engagement website- published information updates; scorecardscomparing the City of Canterbury with the City ofBankstown and the St George Group of Councils;key messages in the top five community languagesof the City - Chinese, Arabic, Greek, Bengali, andVietnamese; and a community survey available insix languages. see www.fitforthefuturecanterbury.com.auThe City of Canterbury - City of Cultural Diversity17

eNewsletters to residents - explaining the “Fit for the Future” programand the options for the City of Canterbury, with prompts to thecommunity surv

An alternative for Canterbury could be to amalgamate with Bankstown. Council signalled its preferred position by way of a resolution, stating its position is to continue its stand-alone existence and that if an amalgamation is the only available option this should be pursued with one or more of the St George councils, not Bankstown.

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Web Site: canterbury-nh.org Town Administrator's Office kfolsom@canterbury-nh.org Selectmen's Office & Welfare Administrator jstout@canterbury-nh.org Assessing Office mirving@canterbury-nh.org 783-9955 Monday — Wednesday — Friday 9:00 -1:00 Town Clerk/Tax Collector bbynum@canterbury-nh.org 783-0153

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

January 2021 / Canterbury Tales Page 3 Canterbury 2020 Holiday Hayride Canterbury held its annual holiday hayride on December 6th. While this year’s hayride was a little different from last year’s event it was well attended. Masks were required and families were able to sit together. The two hay wagons toured the Canterbury neigh-