Example I-1 Composite Beam Design

3y ago
81 Views
2 Downloads
240.54 KB
6 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Brenna Zink
Transcription

I-6Example I-1Composite Beam DesignGiven:A series of 45-ft. span composite beams at 10 ft. o/c are carrying the loads shown below. The beams are ASTMA992 and are unshored. The concrete has f′c 4 ksi. Design a typical floor beam with 3 in. 18 gage composite deck,and 4½ in. normal weight concrete above the deck, for fire protection and mass. Select an appropriate beam anddetermine the required number of shear studs.Solution:Material Properties:Concretef′c 4 ksiBeamFy 50 ksiFu 65 ksiLoads:Dead load:Slab 0.075 kip/ft2Beam weight 0.008 kip/ft2 (assumed)Miscellaneous 0.010 kip/ft2 (ceiling etc.)Live load:Non-reduced 0.10 kips/ft2Since each beam is spaced at 10 ft. o.c.Total dead loadTotal live load 0.093 kip/ft2(10 ft.) 0.93 kips/ft. 0.10 kip/ft2(10ft.) 1.00 kips/ft.Construction dead load (unshored) 0.083 kip/ft2(10 ft) 0.83 kips/ftConstruction live load (unshored) 0.020 kip/ft2(10 ft) 0.20 kips/ftASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.comManualTable 2-3

I-7Determine the required flexural strengthLRFDASDwu 1.2(0.93 kip/ft) 1.6(1.0 kip/ft) 2.72 kip/ft2.72 kip/ft(45 ft)2 687 kip-ft.Mu 8wa 0.93 kip/ft 1.0 kip/ft 1.93 kip/ft1.93 kip/ft(45 ft)2 489 kip-ft.Ma 8Use Tables 3-19, 3-20 and 3-21 from the Manual to select an appropriate memberSectionI.3.1.1aDetermine beffThe effective width of the concrete slab is the sum of the effective widths for each side of thebeam centerline, which shall not exceed:(1) one-eighth of the beam span, center to center of supports45 ft.( 2 ) 11.3 ft.8(2) one-half the distance to center-line of the adjacent beam10 ft.( 2 ) 10.0 ft. Controls2(3) the distance to the edge of the slabNot applicableCalculate the moment arm for the concrete force measured from the top of the steel shape, Y2.Assume a 1.0 in. (Some assumption must be made to start the design process. An assumptionof 1.0 in. has proven to be a reasonable starting point in many design problems.)Y2 tslab – a/2 7.5 – ½ 7.0 in.Enter Manual Table 3-19 with the required strength and Y2 7.0 in. Select a beam and neutralaxis location that indicates sufficient available strength.Manual Table3-19Select a W21 50 as a trial beam.When PNA location 5 (BFL), this composite shape has an available strength of:LRFDφbMn 770 kip-ft 687 kip-ftASDo.k.Mn/Ωb 512 kip-ft 489 kip-fto.k.Note that the required PNA location for ASD and LRFD differ. This is because the live to deadload ratio in this example is not equal to 3. Thus, the PNA location requiring the most sheartransfer is selected to be acceptable for ASD. It will be conservative for LRFD.ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.comManualTable 3-19

I-8Check the beam deflections and available strengthCheck the deflection of the beam under construction, considering only the weight of concrete ascontributing to the construction dead load.Limit deflection to a maximum of 2.5 in. to facilitate concrete placement.335 wDLl 4 5 ( 0.83 kip/ft )( 45 ft ) (1728 in. /ft ) 1, 060 in.4384 E 384 ( 29,000 ksi )( 2.5 in.)4I req From Manual Table 3-20, a W21 50 has Ix 984 in.4, therefore this member does not satisfy thedeflection criteria under construction.Using Manual Table 3-20, revise the trial member selection to a W21 55,which has Ix 1140 in.4, as noted in parenthesis below the shape designation.Check selected member strength as an un-shored beam under construction loads assumingadequate lateral bracing through the deck attachment to the beam flange.LRFDASDCalculate the required strengthCalculate the required strength1.4 DL 1.4 (0.83 kips/ft) 1.16 kips/ftDL LL 0.83 0.20 1.03 kips.ft1.2DL 1.6LL 1.2 (0.83) 1.6(0.20) 1.32 klf1.31 kip/ft(45 ft) 28 331 kip-ft1.03 kips/ft(45 ft) 28 260 kip-ftMu (unshored) Ma (unshored) The design strength for aW21 55 is 473 kip-ft 331 kip-ft o.k.The allowable strength for aW21 55 is 314 kip-ft 260 kip-ft o.k.For a W21 55 with Y2 7.0 in, the member has sufficient available strength when the PNA is atlocation 6 and Qn 292 kips.LRFDφbMn 767 kip-ft 687 kip-ftManualTable 3-19ASDo.k.Mn/Ωb 510 kip-ft 489 kip-ftCheck a Qn292 kips 0.716 in.a '0.85(4ksi)(10ft.)(12 in./ft.)0.85 f c b0.716 in. 1.0 in. assumed o.k.Check live load deflection LL l/360 ((45 ft.)(12 in./ft))/360 1.5 in.A lower bound moment of inertia for composite beams is tabulated inManual Table 3-20.ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.como.k.ManualTable 3-19

I-9For a W21 55 with Y2 7.0 and the PNA at location 6, ILB 2440 in.4Manual Table3-20335 wLL l 4 5 (1.0 kip/ft )( 45 ft ) (1728 in. /ft ) 1.30 in.384 EI LB384 ( 29,000 ksi ) ( 2440 in.4 )4 LL 1.30 in. 1.5 in. o.k.Determine if the beam has sufficient available shear strengthLRFD45ft( 2.72kip/ft ) 61.2 kips2φVn 234 kips 61.2 kipsASD45ft(1.93kip/ft ) 43.4 kips2Vn/Ω 156 kips 43.4 kipsManualTable 3-3Va Vu o.k.o.k.Determine the required number of shear stud connectorsUsing perpendicular deck with one ¾-in. diameter weak stud per rib in normal weight 4 ksiconcrete. Qn 17.2 kips/studManual Table3-21 Qn292 kips 17, on each side of the beam.17.2 kipsQnSection 3.2d(5)Total number of shear connectors; use 2(17) 34 shear connectors.Section 3.2d(6)Check the spacing of shear connectorsSince each flute is 12 in., use one stud every flute, starting at each support, and proceed for 17studs on each end of the span.6dstud 12 in. 8tslab , therefore, the shear stud spacing requirements are met.The studs are to be 5 in. long, so that they will extend a minimum of 12 in. into slab.ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.comSectionI3.2c (b)

ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com

ASDIP Steel is available for purchase online at www.asdipsoft.com

Example I-1 Composite Beam Design Given: A series of 45-ft. span composite beams at 10 ft. o/c are carrying the loads shown below. The beams are ASTM A992 and are unshored. The concrete has f′ c 4 ksi. Design a typical floor beam with 3 in. 18 gage composite deck, and 4½ in. normal weight concrete above the deck, for fire protection and mass.

Related Documents:

Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם

BC1 Page 41 BEAM CLAMP BD1 Page 41 BEAM CLAMP BF1 Page 42 BEAM CLAMP BG1 Page 42 BEAM CLAMP BH1 Page 42 BEAM CLAMP BF2 Page 42 BEAM CLAMP BG2 Page 42 BEAM CLAMP BL FLANGE CLAMP Page 43 GRATE FIX Page 44 BEAM CLAMP GRATING CLIP Page 45 BEAM CLAMP FLOORFIX HT Page 46 FLOORFIX Page

Types of composite: A) Based on curing mechanism: 1- Chemically activated composite 2- Light activated composite B) Based on size of filler particles: 1 - Conventional composite 2- Small particles composite 3-Micro filled composite 4- Hybrid composite 1- Chemically activated, composite resins: This is two - paste system:

Timber-concrete composite slab has higher stiffness, consequently, the depth is decreased and longer spans can be released. Figure 4. Composite CLT slab. 2.2 Slim-floor composite beam 2.2.1 Technical specifications DELTABEAM is a composite beam that consists of two basic components:

A composite beam is normally a steel beam or could be partially encased beam, which is normally subjected to bending and it helps the composite deck slab. It is also a structural partner which is composed of two or more distinguish materials joint together as act of unit. There are different types of composite beam such as steel-wood, wood .

composite beam as a function of the angle of fibers α for several values of the crack depth a/H 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 (value fraction of fibers V 10%, crack location x/L 0.1) 46 Figure.4.13 First, Second and Third mode shapes of non-cracked composite beam 47 Figure.4.14 First mode shapes of cracked composite beam for x 0.1L and relative

Composite beam is a combination construction of different type of materials but the most common use of the materials is when the concrete as a slab and steel as a beam in composite beam. Steel and concrete are very different in nature, but these two materials complement one another; concrete as a slab is efficient in compression and steel as beam

strength of the GSF composite beam by the bending theory equation. Based on the estimation result in Figure 4, the difference between two sections is 1.64X and 1.47X for beam; the GSF composite beam: H-beam bearing strength ratio is 1:0.68 (refer to Figure 5). In other