Reinforcement - University Of Nebraska–Lincoln

2y ago
25 Views
3 Downloads
448.00 KB
8 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nora Drum
Transcription

ReinforcementTiers 1, 2 & 3Strategy Brief, November, 2014.Scott Fluke, Jenna Strawhun & Reece L. Peterson, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.r3o, 2 tion1r eneiT ervIntReinforcement should be one of the first strategiesused to modify behavior. Reinforcement is an extremely powerful tool for schools; yet, it is often underutilized. The purpose of this strategy brief is to defineand describe reinforcement in the context of schools,outline the research documenting its effects, and provideseveral examples of reinforcement strategies that havebeen used in schools.What is Reinforcement?When a behavior is followed by a desirable consequence, that behavior is more likely to be performedin the future or performed more frequently in the future (Alberto & Troutman, 2006; Cooper,Heron, & Heward, 2007). The desirable consequence is called the reinforcer. Conversely, whena behavior is followed by an undesirable outcome, the behavior is less likely to be performedin the future. The undesirable outcome is called a punisher. These principles are at the coreof operant conditioning, where a person’s behavior is modified by its antecedents and consequences.Distinguishing reinforcement from rewards. Reinforcement is sometimes confused withrewards. Rewards are something given in recognition of services, efforts or achievements. However, rewards do not necessarily result in a change in behavior (if that is a goal) even thoughadults may view the rewards as desirable forms of recognition. Some rewards or recognitionsimply may not be sufficiently important to some students to motivate change. Nevertheless,providing a variety of rewards and recognition for students’ appropriate behavior or achievement is desirable, in most cases. However, if the goal is behavior change, reinforcers contingentupon the target behavior must be employed. That is, a reinforcer will only be given if the desired behavior is employed.Many types of rewards are not reinforcers, because they do not result in changed behavior,although all reinforcers are rewards because of an effort to recognize an achievement. Thesetwo terms are sometimes confounded or used interchangeably, butboth are usually desirable.Reinforcement as part of ABC Analysis. Reinforcement comes frompsychological research conducted by B.F. Skinner on the phenomenonknown as operant conditioning. Essentially, “operant conditioning refersto the process determining and making use of the consequences of behavior to affect change

Building & SustainingStudent Engagementin behavior” (Cooper et al., 2007, p. 33).Therefore, reinforcement is aligned with theconsequences portion in the three componentsof Antecedents, Behaviors, and Consequences(often abbreviated as “A-B-C analysis”; Cooperet al., 2007).Positive and negative reinforcement.Reinforcement can involve adding somethingdesirable contingent upon a desirable behavior(e.g., praise, free time, or a toy), or can involvetaking away something that was undesirable (reduced homework, gettingout of assignment, cancelling a quiz,etc.). Taking away something undesirable is called negative reinforcement(Alberto & Troutman, 2006). Negativereinforcement increases behavior bytaking away something undesirablethat would otherwise occur. Notethat, in these definitions, positive andnegative are not judgmental terms;instead, they refer to adding (positive)or taking away (negative).Types of reinforcers. Positive reinforcers can be categorized as tangible,social, or activity reinforcers (Alberto& Troutman, 2006; Zirpoli, 2005). Tangible reinforcement includes something physicalthe child can have, like a sticker, toy, magazine,or a snack. Examples of social reinforcement arepraise or compliments from a parent, teacher, orpeer, a smile, special attention, or acknowledgment of desired behaviors. Activities can alsobe used as potential reinforcers; reading a story,being first in the lunch line, having free time towork on an activity the student chooses, suchReinforcement 2as listening to music, or using the computer oriPad. By providing these reinforcers contingentupon appropriate student behavior, teachersmay provide more potent and salient motivation for students to learn academic conceptsor adhere to behavior expectations (Alberto &Troutman, 2006).Tokens. Sometimes when it is not practicalor feasible to deliver these reinforcers immediately after the desirable behavior, a “token”is given to the student that can be used to “purchase” other reinforcers at a later time. Thustokens “stand in” for other reinforcers to be delivered in the future. Token systems need to clearlyspecify the way that later reinforcers will be madeavailable, and how many tokens are needed toearn specified reinforcers. These systems havebeen widely used both at the classroom andschool-wide levels.What Do We Know AboutReinforcement?A search of the academic literature for theterm “reinforcement” returns over 40,000 articlesfrom the past 60 years! Collectively, this researchhas established reinforcement as an extremelyeffective means of behavioral change (Martin &Pear, 1996). It is a fundamental part of psychologywith profound support for its effectiveness as a

Building & SustainingStudent EngagementReinfrcement 3behavior change strategy – arguably equivalentto the support for the theory of gravity (Maag,2001). Similarly, reinforcement is likely the mostcritical principle of behavior and is an importantcomponent in most behavior change programs(Cooper et al., 2007). In many cases, the connections between behavior and reinforcement arenot always obvious or apparent to the studentwhose behavior is being reinforced (Cooper etal., 2007).Staff behavior. Adult behavior can also beexplained through the principles of reinforcement. Teachers and staff go to work each daybecause it is reinforcing – they receive financialrewards, social rewards, and personal rewardsfor doing so. Reinforcement should be considered a natural and powerful influence on allhuman behavior; as such, it is a valuable tool forstudent behavior change in schools.Effectiveness in classrooms. A seminalstudy in the first issue of the Journal of AppliedBehavior Analysis, a peer-reviewed journal thatpublishes articles related to the experimentalanalysis of behavior, reported that reinforcement delivered through teacher attentionincreased study behaviors for six students (Hall,Lund, & Jackson, 1968). Specifically, teachersprovided attention immediately following desirable study behaviors (e.g., sitting in one’s desk,eyes on paper, writing down assignments) andignored undesirable behaviors (e.g., disruptions,dawdling). Study behaviors increased for thestudents, decreased when the positive attentionwas removed, and were reinstated once attention was delivered again. Thus, simple reinforcement strategies that can be delivered in theclassroom have been effectively documented fordecades. This finding has been documented andexpanded in a wide array of studies throughoutthe intervening years.School wide reinforcement. Reinforcementhas also served as the foundation for the mostsuccessful school-wide behavior programs.These programs, such as Positive BehaviorInterventions and Supports (PBIS; see the PBISStrategy Brief), seek to improve all students’behavior by establishing rules and reinforcinginstances of positive behaviors reflecting adherence to school values or rules. These programshave been very successful at the individual,classroom, school, and even state level (Bradshaw, Mitchell, & Leaf, 2010).Summary of research. It is beyond thescope of this brief to attempt to summarize thevast extent of research on the use of reinforcement, much of which has been conducted inschools and educational environments andvirtually, all of which supports the effectivenessof reinforcement in changing student behaviorand improving school climates. That researchhas been conducted with individual studentsand groups of students. It has addressedstudents with differing levels of academic andbehavioral

providing a variety of rewards and recognition for students’ appropriate behavior or achieve- . although all reinforcers are rewards because of an effort to recognize an achievement. These . because it is reinforcing – they receive financial rewards, social rewards, and personal rewards

Related Documents:

Lincoln Aviator 2002 2005 T107BFL X Lincoln Continental 2000 2002 T107B Lincoln LS 2000 2002 T107BFL T107BFL X Lincoln Mark LT 2006 2008 T301B Lincoln MKC / MKT / MKX / MKZ 2006 2018 ET204 X Lincoln MKS / MKX 2009 2016 T301B ET201 Lincoln Navigator 2003 2017 T109B ET203 Lincoln Town Car 2003 2011 T1

EU-34.2 Nebraska Boiler - #2 fuel oil EU-34.3 Nebraska Boiler - soybean oil EU-34.4 Nebraska Boiler - animal fats EU-34.5 Nebraska Boiler - biodiesel heavies EU-34.6 Nebraska Boiler - biodiesel EP-34.2 EU-34.21 Nebraska Boiler (Heat Recover Stack) - natural gas 02-A-387-S1 EU-34.22 Nebraska Boiler (Heat Recover Stack) - #2 fuel oil

revenue.nebraska.gov . Unemployment Insurance Tax . Nebraska Department of Labor . 550 South 16th P.O. Box 94600 . Lincoln, NE 68509-4600 Help Line: 402-471-9898 TDD: 800-833-7352 NEworks.nebraska.gov . For details on labor laws and wage . and hour information, contact: Nebraska Department of Labor Labor Standards . 402-471-2239 dol.nebraska.gov

NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE . JANUARY 1, 2013 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2013 . This document is an official public record of the State of Nebraska, issued by . . Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 . 402-471-2111, FAX 402-471-3301 . www.auditors.nebraska.gov. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE .

University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0360 402.472.1088 jisernhagen3@unl.edu Jackie Florendo, M.A., Doctoral Candidate Secondary Investigator, Nebraska Statewide Title I Accountability University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68588-0360 402.472.8026 jflorend@unlserve.edu N

w/Lincoln NA-5 Sub-Arc Welding System, Lincoln DC1000 Welder. NELSON TR 850 STUD WELDING SYSTEM, LINCOLN PRECISION TIG 275 TIG WELDER, LINCOLN WELDANPOWER 225 G7 GENERATOR WELDER, (14) LINCOLN IDEALARC DC600 MIG WELDERS, w/Double Header DH-10 Wire Feed, Boom, (10) LINCOLN IDEALARC DC600 MIG WELDERS, w/LN-7 Wire Feed, Boom, (2) LINCOLN

310 : 2000-2006 Lincoln LS, 2006 Zephyr, 2007 & newer Lincoln MKZ and MKX, 2009 & newer MKS, 2002 Lincoln Blackwood, 1998 & newer Lincoln Navigator, 2003-2005 Lincoln Aviator, 2006 & newer Lincoln

the Nebraska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, University of Nebraska-Lincoln for photographs and images. Editor and Design Production: Wilma Gerena Reviewers: Caryl Cashmere and Kevin Pope Layout Design: Abigail Ahmed. Scan this QR code with your smart phone for an electronic copy of this report. University of Nebraska-Lincoln