Attachment I - Probation

3y ago
11 Views
3 Downloads
1.09 MB
27 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aarya Seiber
Transcription

Attachment I

Attachment II

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentAttachment IIIAbout Resource Development AssociatesSince its inception in 1984, the mission of Resource Development Associates (RDA) has been to promotethe welfare of our communities’ vulnerable populations by contributing to the effective functioning ofpublic and non‐profit social service systems. RDA achieves this by providing strategic planning,evaluation, organizational development, grantwriting, assessment, data system development andimplementation, and technical assistance to its clients, which range from community‐based non‐profitsto local, state and federal agencies. Located in Oakland and comprised of a core staff of 20,complimented by a 25‐person consultant corps with a variety of expertise from marketing and brandingto medical doctors, RDA is led by CEO Dr. Patricia Marrone Bennett, who brings more than 35 years’experience in working with and planning for non‐profit and governmental agencies.As a full‐service governmental and non‐profit consultancy, RDA specializes in facilitating comprehensiveplanning and evaluation processes that begin with ground‐floor analysis of Departmental programs,services, and initiatives, and which map real institutional capacities and constraints onto an actionableplan for achieving short‐and long‐term objectives within departmental resources.Throughout our firm history, RDA has led dozens of planning initiatives for state, county, city, andcommunity‐based entities across California. We have a well‐established record of working withprobation departments and other agencies serving juvenile and adult offender and inmate population.We are currently working with the Alameda County Probation Department to review and revise theirjuvenile probation policies and procedures manual to reflect the vision and mission of a newly appointedChief Probation Officer. We are also working with the City of Oakland to conduct a comprehensiveevaluation of juvenile probation outcomes for its violence prevention initiative. We also led anorganizational needs assessment and development initiative with San Francisco County’s JuvenileProbation Department that led to a long‐term training and development plan for leadership and mid‐level managers.RDA also has a long history of consulting on planning projects involving multiple state and countyagencies, as well as community‐based organizations (CBOs) and other service providers. In 2009, RDAconducted an extensive planning process with the State of California to structure its objectives,priorities, and long‐term vision into a framework for systematically evaluating the Mental HealthServices Act. Prior to that, we helped Family Services Agency of San Francisco, the County’s largest non‐profit social service provider, avert a major fiscal collapse through reorganization and strategic overhaul.November 7, 2011Prepared by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 1

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentAttachment IIISelected overview of current and recent relevant experience:Alameda County Probation Department Policies and Procedures Revisions: RDA is currently workingwith the Alameda County Probation Department to review and revise their juvenile probation policiesand procedures and to create a new Juvenile Services Manual that reflects case management approachto serving youth on probation. This project includes the following tasks: review and analysis ofdepartmental documentation; development of service and evaluation protocols; compile documentationof existing service landscape; identify service priorities; draft policies and procedures manual. Uponcompletion of a revised Juvenile Service Manual, RDA will work with Alameda County Probation to helprevise their Adult Probation Services policies and procedures.City of Oakland Measure Y Violence Prevention and Community Policing Initiative: RDA is working withthe City of Oakland’s Department of Human services to evaluate the City’s Measure Y ViolencePrevention and Community Policing Initiative. RDA designed and implemented Scan, Analyze, Respond,Assess (SARA), a web‐based data collection and reporting tool for Oakland Police Department; we havealso worked with service providers, probation, schools, and other key stakeholders to develop initiative‐wide logic models, led participatory action research evaluation effort of CBOs providing direct services,including process and outcome evaluations, and authored several initiative‐wide and program‐specificreports.San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Organizational Development: RDA worked with the SanFrancisco Juvenile Probation Department to support internal organizational development efforts. RDAconducted a departmental needs assessment, identified strategic service priorities, researched bestpractices, developed a leadership training plan, provided staff coaching, management and leadershiptraining; and led organizational planning efforts.Santa Barbara County Juvenile Offender Reentry Plan: RDA worked with Santa Barbara County Alcohol,Drug, and Mental Health Services Department (ADMHS), Santa Barbara Probation Department, and fourcommunity‐based treatment providers to implement substance abuse treatment program for malejuvenile offenders. The tasks in this project included researching the target population; working withstakeholders to identify service needs, researching best practices; identifying the appropriate risk/needsassessment tool, and drafting an implementation plan.November 7, 2011Prepared by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 2

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentAttachment IIIRecent consulting experience with San Mateo County agencies:San Mateo County Juvenile Court and Human Services Agency Grantwriting: In 2002, RDA collaboratedwith San Mateo County Children and Family Services, Human Services Agency and Juvenile Court todevelop and submit successful proposal for a Juvenile and Family Drug Court to the U.S. Department ofJustice. Three years later, RDA wrote a subsequent successful proposal to expand Juvenile Drug Courtservices to include The G.I.R.L.S (Gaining Independence and Reclaiming Lives Successfully) Program.San Mateo County Human Services Agency’s CalWIN Evaluation: In 2006, RDA worked with San MateoCounty’s Human Services Agency to evaluate the impact of the CalWIN system on the Human ServicesDepartment in regards to workflow, interaction with clients, and agency communication. The evaluationsought to measure whether the implementation of CalWIN had led to the desired outcomes of timesaving to complete forms and paperwork and more self‐sufficiency for clients, and to determine whetherstaff had the resources they needed to use CalWIN most effectively. As a result of the findings of thisevaluation, the San Mateo Human Services Agency implemented additional training and technicalsupport options for staff utilizing the CalWIN system and they improved the reporting features of thesystem. The Evaluation design included a one day time study, staff surveys and focus groups.Cañada College Hispanic‐Serving Institutions (HSI) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM)Program Evaluation: RDA worked with Cañada College to conduct a process and outcome evaluation ofa STEM program aimed at increasing number of Hispanic and low income students pursuing STEMdegrees. Identified measurable outcomes; performed quantitative data analysis; demographic analysis;pre/post test surveys; focus groups; key informant interviews; authored evaluation report.Community Gatepath Autism Works Evaluation: RDA recently completed an evaluation of San Mateo’sCommunity Gatepath Autism Works. This project included developing a program logic model; reviewingand analyzing Autism Works staff data; conducting key informant interviews, focus groups, structuredobservation of participants; developing and administering satisfaction surveys, formulatingrecommendations for program improvements; and authoring a final report.Contact UsAndy Riesenberg, ScMSenior Project rcedevelopment.netNovember 7, 2011Mikaela Rabinowitz, PhDProgram ed by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 3

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentAttachment IVTimeline for the Development of San Mateo County’s Local Implementation Plan (LIP)Project MonthMay – SeptemberOctober ‐ NovemberObjectiveUnderstand the PopulationBeing ServedUtilize an interim realignmentprocess for reentry of the PostRelease Community Supervision(PRCS) population that reflects theirneeds and applies best practices.Identifying Services’Priorities and GapsActivities Understand the existing scope andlandscape of services for the PRCSpopulation in San Mateo County,and identify service priorities andunmet service needs. MilestonesSan Mateo Health System, HumanServices, and ProbationDepartments have met regularlyto prepare for realignment.Developed a collaborativeapproach to delivering services tothe PRCS Population.San Mateo County Developed aninterim realignment process toprepare for the PRCS populationreturning home beginning Oct 1.Convene a forum withCommunity‐Based Organizations.Conduct Key Informant Interviewswith CCP members, and Countyagency and working group leadersFacilitate a half‐day workshopwith CCP members to discusssubstantive issues related to theLIP development. DecemberAnalysis of Stakeholder InputAnalyze and summarize key issuesidentified during stakeholdermeetings and community feedbackto inform LIP development.November 7, 2011Please note: all dates are subject to change1 Convene a forum with Community members.Develop a briefing document containing service needs for thePRCS population, and the sharedgoals and values of the CCP inmeeting those needs.Oct 1 – Commencement of thePRCS reentry into thecommunity.Oct 12 – Introduction ofconsultant (RDA) at CCPMeetingNov 3 – CBO ForumNov 9 – Updates provided atCCP MeetingNov 30 – CCP Half‐DayWorkshopEarly Dec TBD – CommunityForumDec 14 – Status Updatesprovided at the CCP MeetingPrepared by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentProject MonthObjectiveJanuaryDrafting a Local ImplementationPlan for San Mateo CountyDevelop a comprehensive anddetailed Local ImplementationPlan that reflects stakeholderinput and evidence‐basedpractices, and includesmeasurable objectives andoutcome measures.JanuaryFebruaryDrafting a Local ImplementationPlan for San Mateo CountyDevelop a comprehensive anddetailed Local ImplementationPlan that reflects stakeholderinput and evidence‐basedpractices, and includesmeasurable objectives andoutcome measures.Share a Draft of the Plan forStakeholder InputNovember 7, 2011Please note: all dates are subject to change2Attachment IVActivities MilestonesCreate a blueprint for theappropriate array of servicesto address the needs of thePRCS population.Develop an evaluation logicmodel or framework withindicators of success.Draft a comprehensive anddetailed Local ImplementationPlan.Jan 12 – Status Updates providedat CCP meetingCreate a blueprint for theappropriate array of servicesto address the needs of thePRCS population.Develop an evaluation logicmodel or framework withindicators of success.Draft a comprehensive anddetailed Local ImplementationPlan.Present a draft LIP to the CCP.Identify a process for CBO andcommunity comments on thedraft LIP.Jan 12 – Status Updates providedat CCP meeting Feb 3 – Draft LIP posted onthe CCP Web siteFeb 15 – Presentation of thedraft LIP at the CCP MeetingPrepared by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentMarchPresent the Local ImplementationPlan to the Board of SupervisorsNovember 7, 2011Please note: all dates are subject to change3Attachment IV Present the LIP to the Board ofSupervisors withrecommendations for theprovision of evidence‐basedand cost‐effective services tothe PRCS population.March 13 – Presentation of theLIP to the Board of SupervisorsPrepared by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES

Local Implementation Plan DevelopmentSan Mateo County Probation DepartmentAttachment VNext steps for RDA for November:1. Compile, analyze feedback from CBO forum; produce briefing reportThe CBO forum gave us the opportunity to get feedback from approx. 50 serviceproviders in San Mateo County who will be instrumental in serving the PRCSpopulation. At the forum, these providers discussed three key questions:i. What services they can provide to assist San Mateo County in successfullyserving the PRCS populationii. What they need from the County in order to do soiii. What recommendations service providers have for the development ofthe LIPRDA is working to compile this feedback in order to highlight common themesand to identify service gaps and provider needs.2. Complete individual interviewsIn order to assist the county as it develops a Local Implementation Plan (LIP) forserving the population transitioning to County responsibility as part of the AB109 population. RDA is in the process of speaking with CCP members eitherindividually or in pairs in the form of key informant interviews in order to betterunderstanding of the following: The roles and responsibilities for each of the members of the CCP and theagencies they represent The vision, values, and service priorities for developing and implementing aLocal Implementation Plan The strengths and weaknesses of the interim planWe have already started the key informant interview process and intend to havespoken to everyone who is available and interested in speaking with us by Wed.Nov. 23.3. Prepare for half‐day CCP workshopPrior to the half‐day CCP workshop in Nov 30, RDA will compile the results of ourKey Informant Interviews and combine these results with the feedback from theCBO forum in order to begin drafting a guiding Mission /Vision/ Goals statementfor the LIP and the CCP. This draft will be reviewed by the CCP members andonce a shared Mission /Vision/ Goals statement has been agreed upon, thisstatement will serve as the foundation for the development of the LIP.November 7, 2011Prepared by RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES 1

Attachment VIDraft documentIn April 2011, the California Legislature passed the Public Safety Act (Assembly Bill 109), whichtransfers responsibility of supervising lower level inmates and parolees from the CaliforniaDepartment of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) to local county probation departments.The targeted population, also known as Post Release Community Supervisees (PRCS), is nonviolent, non-serious, and nonsexual offenders. It is anticipated that 400 to 600 PRCS will cometo San Mateo County over a three year period, starting October 1, 2011. This population willhave diverse health and human services needs including food, shelter, benefits, employment,medical, mental health and substance use treatment.The San Mateo County Health System and Human Services Agency (HSA) collaborated withProbation to develop this plan to respond to PRCSs commencing October 1st and to protectpublic safety and support rehabilitation of the criminal justice population realigned to San MateoCounty. Health and Human Services goals align with our partners in the criminal justice arena,and include: Ensuring public safety: By working closing with the Probation Department, we hope tocreate processes and protocols to best support returning supervisees. Enhancing Probation Department tools and resources necessary for success: Many ofthe PRCS will have numerous and diverse needs. Our goal is to work through amultidisciplinary approach with the Probation Department to ensure there is a warm hand-offto services, as well as ongoing consultation on high-risk cases. Improving Outcomes: Currently, people who enter our criminal justice system have a 70%of chance of returning. We expect that with appropriate services delivered in a timelymanner we can improve these outcomes and best prepare San Mateo County to benefitfrom incentive programs built into the realignment process. We hope that by targeting thetop three historical criminogenic needs, which include mental health, alcohol and other drugproblems, we can effectively reduce recidivism rates. Researching and implementing evidence-based practices: There are numerousevidence-based practices that show individualized treatment and supports are key topreventing people from returning to the criminal justice system and fostering successfulliving in the community. We will do ongoing evaluations of the successes and failures ofapproach, adjust as needed, and keep up with the research in this area. Restoring residents to be contributors in their cities and County: We know fromexperience that every client has the potential to make considerable contributions to theircommunity. Linkages to our local community-based partners will be critical to ensure PRCSclients reconnect and develop substantial and meaningful ties to their communities.Proposed ModelHealth System, Human Services and the Probation Departments have met regularly since May2011. Together we developed a collaborative approach to delivering services to the PRCSpopulation. Each department has identified their individual responsibilities, as well as areas forcollaboration to provide the best possible service integration for clients.1

Attachment VIDraft documentThe Probation Department is responsible for enforcement of release conditions and casemanagement of all returning PRCS. The Health System and Human Services Agency areresponsible for connecting PRCS to appropriate services to meet their immediate and long-termneeds. All three departments take a multidisciplinary team approach with Probation for high-riskcases. The model has a strength-based framework and focuses on employment, training andwork opportunities, wellness and recovery, and supports for re-entry back into the communityand family re-integration. The model commences with preparing while the PRCS is still inprison; continues upon the PRCS’s arrival in San Mateo County; and ensures success in thecommunity.The plan reflects activities that will promote the desired outcomes: Progress/engagement in treatmentReduction in arrestsReduction in incarceration/recidivismImproved housing status, andImproved employment status.Roles and responsibilitiesThe California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) estimates 351 PRCS willbe released to San Mateo County over the next three years. Information from CDCR hasfluctuated, and Probation estimates there will be a range of between 400-600, or an average of25-30 per month. All PRCS released from the prison system anywhere in California are given 200 cash. They are required to present themselves to a Probation Officer in Redwood Citywithin 48 hours of release.In addition, an estimated similar number of new cases that would have formerly gone to Stateprison will now be jailed locally. This plan refers solely to the PRCS population because noplanning has been done with HSA and Health for the locally-sentenced population. We wouldencourage those who are planning for the locally-sentenced population to consider expandingAchieve 180 to reduce recidivism and support offenders in returning to productive lives in theircommunities.Probation DepartmentProbation is responsible for setting and enforcement of release conditions, assessing for risk ofrecidivism and case management of all PRCS. Probation is the lead agency responsible forcoordinating with CDCR in advance of release from State prison and developing all aspects ofthe plan required to supervise the members of the population post-release. Probation expectsto receive advance notice of at least thirty days from CDCR of the roster of inmates scheduledfor rele

San Mateo County Juvenile Court and Human Services Agency Grantwriting: In 2002, RDA collaborated with San Mateo County Children and Family Services, Human Services Agency and Juvenile Court to develop and submit successful proposal for a Juvenile and Family Drug Court to the U.S. Department of

Related Documents:

To: Metalogix International GmbH ( kathleen@ansarilaw.com ) Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 85255200 - METALOGIX - N/A Sent: 3/14/2013 12:13:23 PM Sent As: ECOM112@USPTO.GOV Attachments: Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 .

Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם

Probation Office, the Chief Probation Officer authorizes all expenditures of the Probation Office and maintains appropriate fiscal controls. The Chief Probation Officer fulfills the statutory duties of the position and supervises activities of the United States Probation Of

Mesa, AZ Karen Madden Probation Supervisor Coconino County Adult Probation Flagstaff, AZ Kevin Manny Adult Probation Officer II . Yuma County Juvenile Justice Center Yuma, AZ John Morris Chief Yavapai County Adult Probation Prescott, AZ Paul O'Connell Operations Director, CC AZ Department of Corrections Phoenix, AZ Heather Preston Probation .

Both the probation (down 38,300) and parole (down 500) populations declined during 2012. During 2012, an estimated 4.1 million adults moved onto or off probation. Probation entries (2,048,300) declined for the fifth consecutive year, while probation exits (2,089,800) declined for the third consecutive year.

Attachment 2: Principal Candidate Resume Attachment 3: School Administrator Resume Attachment 4: Governance Documents Attachment 5: Statement of Assurances Attachment 6: Board Members Information Attachment 7: Conflict of Interest Attachment 8: Scope and Sequence Attachment 9: Academic E

BUDGET, FINANCE, AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE March 23, 2022, TIME: 10:15 AM to 12:15 PM THE CAROLINA INN OPEN SESSION FOR ACTION Attachment A Attachment B . Attachment C . Attachment D Attachment E Attachment F Attachment G . Attachment H. 1. All-Funds Budget Model. Nathan Knuffman, Vice Chancellor for Finance and Operations 2.

To: Metalogix International GmbH (kathleen@ansarilaw.com) Subject: U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 85255200 - METALOGIX - N/A Sent: 1/6/2015 11:03:38 PM Sent As: ECOM117@USPTO.GOV Attachments: Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8