Study #893 28 June 2019 NCT04901897

2y ago
14 Views
2 Downloads
1.64 MB
79 Pages
Last View : 23d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jacoby Zeller
Transcription

Study #89328 June 2019NCT04901897

Study #893 - ProtocolINVESTIGATOR STATEMENT OF APPROVALA Study to Evaluate the Product Performance of a New Silicone Hydrogel ContactLensPROTOCOLSTUDY #893I have read the attached document, concur that it contains all information necessary toconduct the study, and agree to abide by all provisions set forth therein.I agree to conduct this study in accordance with 21CFR Parts 11, 50, 54, 56, 812, and42 USC 282(j); and with consideration of the provision in: ISO 14155-1:2009 Clinicalinvestigation of medical devices for human subjects – Part 1: General requirements; 141552:2009 Part 2: Clinical investigation of medical devices for human subjects – Part 2:Clinical investigational plan; ISO 11980:2009 Ophthalmic Optics – Contact Lenses andcontact lens care products – Guidance for clinical investigations; ICH, GCPs, andapplicable local regulations. I will not initiate the study until I have obtained writtenapproval by the appropriate IRB and have complied with all financial and administrativerequirements of the governing body of the clinical institution and the Sponsor. I will obtainwritten informed consent from each study subject prior to performing any study specificprocedures.I understand that my signature on this document indicates my agreement to this clinicalInvestigational Plan/Protocol and to review and, if appropriate, sign the clinical studyreport.I understand that my e-signature on an electronic case report form indicates that the datatherein has been reviewed and accepted by me.I understand that this document and related information is subject to confidentiality termsfound in my signed Confidentiality or Clinical Services Agreement. I agree to protect theconfidentiality of my patients when allowing the Sponsor of this clinical investigation,and/or relevant regulatory authorities and IRBs, direct access to my medical records forstudy subjects.Principal Investigator, Printed NamePrincipal Investigator, SignatureDateUpon signing, provide a copy of this page to Bausch Lomb and retain a copy for your files.Page 2 of 79

Study #893 - ProtocolPERSONNEL AND FACILITIESNOTE: The information on this page is subject to change. All changes will be provided separately.SponsorBausch Lomb, Inc.1400 North Goodman StreetRochester, NY 14609USBiostatisticsClinical OperationsData ManagementStudy Manager (Primary Study Contact)Clinical Trial MaterialsScientific & Clinical AffairsMedical Monitor (for Safety Reporting)Global Regulatory AffairsPharmacovigilance (not for Safety Reporting)Page 3 of 79

Study #893 - ProtocolSYNOPSISName of Sponsor/Company: Bausch Lomb IncorporatedName of Investigational Product:Test: Bausch Lomb kalifilcon A daily disposable contact lensControls: Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys 1-Day with HydraLuxe (senofilconA) daily disposable contact lens and Alcon DAILIES TOTAL1 (delefilcon A) dailydisposable contact lensesTitle of Study: A Study to Evaluate the Product Performance of a New SiliconeHydrogel Contact LensNumber of Clinical Centers: Approximately 35 investigative sites, United StatesonlyPrimary Objective:The objective of this study is to evaluate the product performance of a new siliconehydrogel daily disposable contact lens, kalifilcon A, compared to the Johnson &Johnson Acuvue Oasys 1-Day with HydraLuxe (senofilcon A) daily disposablecontact lens and Alcon DAILIES TOTAL1 (delefilcon A) daily disposable contactlenses when worn by current soft contact lens wearers on a daily disposable wearbasis.Methodology: The study is evaluating the product performance of a new siliconehydrogel daily disposable contact lens packaged in a unique phosphate bufferedsolution. The silicone hydrogel contact lens infused with a unique phosphate bufferedsolution offers the advantage of a high oxygen material infused with ingredients formoisture retention and osmoprotection designed to promote a consistent level ofhealth of the eye.Approximately 800 subjects (1600 eyes) will be enrolled in this two-week, three arms,randomized, parallel, bilateral, single-masked study at approximately 35 investigativesites in the United States. The study is designed to include habitual wearers of siliconehydrogel lenses. Subjects must habitually wear Alcon’s Air Optix Aqua, Air Optixwith HydraGlyde, Air Optix Night & Day, Bausch Lomb’s PureVision 2, Bausch Lomb ULTRA, CooperVision’s Biofinity, Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys withHydraClear or Acuvue Vita soft contact lenses. Approximately one-quarter of thesubjects enrolled in this study must currently wear the Alcon silicone hydrogel lenses,one-quarter of the subjects must currently wear Bausch Lomb silicone hydrogellenses, one-quarter of the subjects must currently wear CooperVision siliconehydrogel lenses and one-quarter of the subjects must currently wear Johnson &Johnson silicone hydrogel lenses.At the Screening/Dispensing Visit, approximately 400 subjects will be randomized toreceive Bausch Lomb investigational kalifilcon A daily disposable contact lenses(Test), approximately 200 subjects will be randomized to receive Johnson & JohnsonAcuvue Oasys 1-Day with HydraLuxe (senofilcon A) daily disposable contactPage 4 of 79

Study #893 - Protocollenses (Control), and approximately 200 subjects will be randomized to receive AlconDAILIES TOTAL1 (delefilcon A) daily disposable contact lenses (Control).Subjects will be assigned randomization numbers sequentially as they are enrolledand deemed eligible to participate. Randomization will be stratified by investigationalsite. Lenses will be dispensed according to randomization schedules provided to theunmasked designee at each site.Number of Subjects Planned: Approximately 800 subjects (1600 eyes)Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Inclusion: Subjects must be 18 to 40 years old on the date the ICF is signed and have capacityto provide voluntary informed consent. Subjects must be myopic and require lens correction from -0.50 to -6.00 Diopter(D) with 0.25 D steps, in each eye. Subjects must be correctable through spherocylindrical refraction and with softspherical contact lenses to 32 letters (0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle ofresolution [logMAR]) or better (2 meters distance, high-contrast chart) in eacheye. Subjects must be free of any anterior segment disorders. Subjects must be adapted soft contact lens wearers and willing to wear their studylenses for at least 8 hours per day on a daily disposable wear basis forapproximately 2 weeks. Subjects must have access to internet connection and personal email tosend/receive emails. Subjects must habitually wear either Alcon’s Air Optix Aqua, Air Optix withHydraGlyde, Air Optix Night & Day, Bausch Lomb’s PureVision 2, Bausch Lomb ULTRA, CooperVision’s Biofinity, Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys with HydraClear , or Acuvue Vita soft contact lenses.Key Exclusion Criteria: Subjects participating in any drug or device clinical investigation within 2 weeksprior to entry into this study (Screening/Dispensing Visit) and/or during the periodof study participation. Subjects who have worn gas permeable (GP) contact lenses within the last 30 daysor who have worn polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) lenses within the last threemonths. Subjects who have any systemic or ocular disease currently affecting ocular healthin the Investigator’s opinion may have an effect on ocular health during the courseof the study. Subjects using any systemic, topical or topical ocular medications that will in theInvestigator’s opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.Page 5 of 79

Study #893 - Protocol Subjects who currently wear daily disposable, monovision, multifocal, or toriccontact lenses. Subjects with an refractive astigmatism of greater than 0.75 D in either eye. Subjects with anisometropia (spherical equivalent) of greater than 2.00 D. Subjects who are amblyopic. Subjects who have had any corneal surgery (e.g., refractive surgery).Investigational Product, Dosage and Mode of Administration:The investigator or designee will instruct all subjects to adhere to the SubjectInstructions provided with their study contact lenses.In order to ensure that the investigator and site staff remain masked to the study lens,an unmasked designee at each site will be responsible for all study lens accountability,including dispensation and collection of study supplies to subjects.Subjects are to be instructed not to discuss or show the dispensed study lenses to theInvestigator or masked site staff during the study.Subjects will be instructed that other contact lenses (other than the study lenses) andcontact lens care products (other than the drops provided) are not allowed to be usedduring the study period.Study Duration of Treatment: approximately 2 weeksCriteria for Evaluation:The primary endpoints are as follows:Effectiveness:The primary effectiveness endpoints to be evaluated at the 2-Week Follow-Up Visitare as follows: Mean logMAR contact lens visual acuity at the 2-Week Follow-Up Visit Proportion of subjects in the Test lens group agreeing with the statement “Arecomfortable throughout the day” Proportion of subjects in the Test lens group agreeing with the statement“Provide clear vision throughout the day”Page 6 of 79

Study #893 - Protocol Safety:The primary safety endpoint will be the proportion of subjects with slit lamp findingsgreater than Grade 2 at any follow-up visit.Statistical Methods:Continuous data will be summarized using descriptive statistics: sample size (n),mean, standard deviation (SD), median, minimum and maximum. Categorical datawill be presented using the total counts for each category and correspondingpercentages. The denominator for each percentage will be the number of subjects oreyes with non-missing data at the given visit for each respective study treatment,unless otherwise indicated.Monocular contact lens logMAR visual acuity will be compared between the test lensand each comparator using a one-sided two-sample t-test and a non-inferiority marginof 0.06.The proportions of subjects agreeing with each of two statements on the subjectquestionnaires will be compared to 0.5 (50%) using one-sided χ2 tests.The proportion of eyes with slit lamp findings greater than Grade 2 at the follow-upvisit will be compared between the test lens and each comparator using confidencelimits constructed using the Newcombe-Wilson score method and a non-inferioritymargin of 0.05 (5%).If the test lens is statistically successful in all primary endpoints, then the test lens willbe statistically successful overall.Sample Size Calculations:Assuming that the test is identical in performance to each comparator for all primaryendpoints, that the primary endpoints are independent, and that the assumptions usedin each power calculation are correct, the overall power of the trial is greater than90%.Page 7 of 79

Study #893 - ProtocolTABLE OF CONTENTSPAGEINVESTIGATOR STATEMENT OF APPROVAL . 2PERSONNEL AND FACILITIES . 3SYNOPSIS . 4TABLE OF CONTENTS . 8LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .121.0INTRODUCTION .132.0OBJECTIVE .133.0STUDY DESIGN .133.1DESCRIPTION OF STUDY DESIGN .133.2SELECTION OF STUDY POPULATION .143.2.1Eligibility.143.2.1.1Inclusion Criteria .143.2.1.2Exclusion Criteria .153.2.2Subject Completion .163.2.3Lost to Follow-up .173.3INVESTIGATORS .173.4STUDY DURATION .173.5PROTOCOL CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS .184.0STUDY MATERIALS .184.1DESCRIPTION OF TEST ARTICLE(S) (STUDY LENSES) .184.2DESCRIPTION OF COMPARATOR PRODUCT(S) .194.3INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE AND ADMINISTRATION .194.3.1Storage Requirements .194.3.2Subject Instructions .194.3.3Fitting Guide .204.4OTHER STUDY MATERIALS .204.5PACKAGING AND LABELING .204.6ACCOUNTABILITY .204.7MASKING/UNMASKING .214.8PRODUCT REPLACEMENT .214.9RISK ASSESSMENT .215.0STUDY METHODS .225.1STUDY VISITS .225.1.1Screening/Dispensing Visit (Day 1) .225.1.22-Week Follow-up Visit (Day 11-17) .245.1.3Exit Visit .255.1.4Market Research Surveys .265.1.4.1Online Consumer Survey .265.1.4.2Investigator Questionnaire .275.1.5Unscheduled Visits .275.1.6Missed Visits .295.2STUDY COMPLETION.295.2.1Study Termination/Suspension.295.3CONCOMITANT MEDICATIONS/THERAPY .295.4PROTOCOL DEVIATIONS.296.0ADVERSE EVENTS .306.1.1 ADVERSE EVENT (AE) .306.1.2Adverse Device Effect (ADE) .30Page 8 of 79

Study #893 - Protocol6.1.2.1Anticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (ASADE) .316.1.2.2Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect (UADE) .316.1.3Serious Adverse Event (SAE) .316.1.4Significant Non-Serious Adverse Events .326.1.5Non-Significant Non-Serious Adverse Events .326.2ADVERSE EVENT TREATMENT AND CULTURING.336.3EVALUATIONS .336.3.1Severity .336.3.2Relationship to Study Device .336.4PROCEDURES FOR REPORTING SAES AND SIGNIFICANT NON-SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS.346.4.1Off-site Unanticipated Adverse Device Effect Reporting .356.4.2Reporting Device Deficiencies .356.4.3Guidelines for Reporting Pregnancies .367.0STATISTICAL METHODS .367.1STUDY ENDPOINTS .367.1.1Primary Effectiveness Endpoints .367.1.2Secondary Effectiveness Endpoints .367.1.3Other/Supportive Effectiveness Variables .377.1.4Primary Safety Endpoint .377.1.5Other Safety Variables .377.2HYPOTHESES .377.2.1Contact Lens Visual Acuity (VA) .377.2.2Proportions of Subjects Agreeing .377.2.3Slit Lamp Findings .377.3SAMPLE SIZE .387.3.1Contact Lens Visual Acuity .387.3.2Proportions of Subjects Agreeing .387.3.2.1Test Lens Group .387.3.2.2Comparator Lens Groups .387.3.3Slit Lamp Findings .387.3.4Overall Power and Enrollment Targets .387.3.4.1Overall Power .387.3.4.2Enrollment Target .397.4RANDOMIZATION .397.5STUDY POPULATIONS .397.5.1Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population .397.5.2Per Protocol (PP) Population .397.5.3Safety Population .397.6STATISTICAL ANALYSIS .397.6.1Methods of Analysis.397.6.1.1General Methods .397.6.1.2Primary Endpoint Analysis .397.6.1.3Definition of Statistical Success .407.6.2Subject Demographics and Baseline Characteristics .407.6.3Subject Disposition .417.6.4Protocol Deviations .417.6.5Treatment Compliance .417.6.6Treatment Exposure .417.6.7Missing Data .417.6.8Multiple Comparisons .417.6.9Interim Analyses .418.08.18.28.38.48.5DATA QUALITY ASSURANCE .41STUDY MONITORING .41SOURCE DOCUMENTATION .42CASE REPORT FORMS AND DATA VERIFICATION .43RECORDING OF DATA AND RETENTION OF DOCUMENTS .43AUDITING PROCEDURES .44Page 9 of 79

Study #893 - Protocol8.6INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD .448.7PUBLICATION OF RESULTS .448.8STATEMENTS OF COMPLIANCE .448.8.1Ethics Review.448.8.2Ethical Conduct of the Investigation .458.8.3Informed Consent Process .459.09.0REFERENCES .46CORNEAL INFILTRATES EVALUATION FORM.B-15Page 10 of 79

Study #893 - ProtocolAPPENDICESAPPENDIX A:SCHEDULE OF VISITS AND PARAMETERS. A-1APPENDIX B:METHODS OF CLINICAL EVALUATION .B-1APPENDIX C:SUBJECT INSTRUCTIONS . C-1APPENDIX D:FITTING GUIDE . D-8Page 11 of 79

Study #893 - ProtocolLIST OF ABBREVIATIONSAbbreviationTerm/AcronymADE Adverse Device EffectAE Adverse EventASADE Anticipated Serious Adverse Device EffectBSCVA Best Spectacle-Corrected Visual AcuityCFR Code of Federal RegulationsCRA Clinical Research AssociateCRO Clinical Research OrganizationD DioptereCRF Electronic Case Report FormFDA United States Food and Drug AdministrationGCPs Good Clinical PracticesGP Gas PermeableHIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability ActICF Informed Consent FormICH International Conference on HarmonisationID IdentificationIRB Institutional Review BoardISO International Organization for StandardizationITT Intent-to-TreatlogMAR Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolutionmm MillimeterOD Right EyeOS Left EyePP Per ProtocolPMMA PolymethylmethacrylateROPI Report of Prior InvestigationsSAE Serious Adverse EventSD Standard DeviationTel TelephoneUADE Unanticipated Adverse Device EffectUS United StatesVA Visual AcuityNOTE: The first occurrence of some abbreviations is not spelled out in the document (e.g., units ofmeasure).Page 12 of 79

Study #893 - Protocol1.0INTRODUCTIONBausch Lomb is evaluating the product performance of a newsilicone hydrogel contactlens packaged in a unique phosphate buffered solution. The silicone hydrogel contact lensinfused with a unique phosphate buffered solution offers the advantage of a high oxygenmaterial infused with ingredients for moisture retention and osmoprotection designed topromote a consistent level of health of the eye.2.0OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study is to evaluate the product performance of a new siliconehydrogel daily disposable contact lens, kalifilcon A, compared to the Johnson & JohnsonAcuvue Oasys 1-Day with HydraLuxe (senofilcon A) daily disposable contact lensesand Alcon DAILIES TOTAL1 (delefilcon A) daily disposable contact lenses when wornby current soft contact lens wearers on a daily disposable wear basis.3.03.1STUDY DESIGNDescription of Study DesignApproximately 800 subjects (1600 eyes) will be enrolled in this two-week, three arm,randomized, parallel, bilateral, single-masked study at approximately 35 investigative sitesin the United States (US). Subjects will be assigned randomization numbers sequentiallyas they are enrolled and deemed eligible to participate. Lenses will be dispensed accordingto randomization schedules provided to the unmasked designee at each site.At the Screening/Dispensing Visit, approximately 400 subjects will be randomized toreceive Bausch Lomb kalifilcon A daily disposable contact lenses (Test), approximately200 subjects will be randomized to receive Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys 1-Day withHydraLuxe (senofilcon A) daily disposable contact lenses (Control), and approximately200 subjects will be randomized to receive Alcon DAILIES TOTAL1 (delefilcon A) dailydisposable contact lenses (Control). Subjects in all three study arms will wear the assignedlenses on a daily disposable wear basis for approximately two weeks. The lenses must bereplaced with a new lens each day. Note: A new lens must be inserted/replaced whenevera lens is removed, however, this is intended to occur once each day and in general, shouldnot occur multiple times throughout the day.The study is designed to include habitual wearers of silicone hydrogel lenses. Subjectsmust habitually wear Alcon’s Air Optix Aqua, Air Optix with HydraGlyde, Air Optix Night& Day, Bausch Lomb’s PureVision 2, Bausch Lomb ULTRA, CooperVision’sBiofinity, Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys with HydraClear , or Acuvue Vita soft

hydrogel lenses. Subjects must habitually wear Alcon’s Air Optix Aqua, Air Optix with HydraGlyde, Air Optix Night & Day, Bausch Lomb’s PureVision 2, Bausch Lomb ULTRA, CooperVision’s Biofinity, Johnson & Johnson Acuvue Oasys with HydraClear or Acuvue V

Related Documents:

Conc Diagram- All Failures Cispa Data Avalon Date PCB Lot Number Igarashi TPS date codes. MB Panel Number VIAS Hole Location Failure 9-June'09 11-June'09 923 162 12-June'09 923 163,164 TBD TBD 1 13-June'09 923 164 15-June'09 923 166 16-June'09 923 167 17-June'09 923 168,171 18-June'09 923 171 19-June'09 923 171 20-June'09 923 171 22-June'09 923 173 23-June '09 923 179 24-June '09 923 .

CUSTOMER SERVICE 361 WEST DUSSEL DRIVE MAUMEE, OHIO 43537 (41 9) 893-4356. RLG-2 AND RLG-4 LOADGARD OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS REVISION 08-31-05 HELM Instrument Company, Inc. 361 West Dussel Drive Maumee, Ohio USA Phone: 419.893.4356 Fax: 419.893.1371 4 INTRODUCTION

Coupling Catalogue Push-in and Composite Building Block Push-in and Composite Building Block S D Hex . WABCO # Rotolock R M12 1.5 18 893 920 364 2 899 700 114 4 R M14 1.5 18 893 920 370 2 899 700 114 4 R M16 1.5 22 893 920 365

2019 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2019 BMW X7 2019 Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2019 BMW Z4 2019 Audi A3 2019 Buick Cascada 2019 Audi A4 2019 Buick Enclave 2019 Audi A5 2019 Buick Encore 2019 Audi A6 2019 Buick Envision 2019 Audi A7 2019 Buick LaCrosse 2019 Audi A8 2019 Buick Regal 2019 Audi Allroad

June 16 Shelach Lecha June 23 - Korach June 30 Hukath We Remember Sylvia Marans Elberg - June Vera Meyerhoff - June Daniel Rosenberg - June1 Edward Wandrei - June 6 Helen Feinberg-Ginsburg - June 6 Thelma Cohn - June 12 Wilma Sizemore June - 16 Joseph P. Suffel - June 21 Eliot Rivers - June 31 Paul Aaron Kowarsky - Sivan 14 -

Winter Carnival 14 June P&C Disco 8 17 June Board Meeting 18 June 19 June 20 June 21 June Bletchley Vale Cup 9 24 June Swimming Lessons Yr 3 – 6 P&C Meeting 25 June Swimming Lessons Yr 3 – 6 26 June Swimming Lessons Yr 3 – 6 Pre Primary Junior Olympics 27 June Swimming Lessons Yr 3 – 6 Yr2 Start Smart 28 June Swimming Lessons Yr 3 – 6 10

HONOUR BOARD VOLUNTEERS 2019 - CURRENT David Staniforth Boorowa 2019 Bruce Gruber Boorowa 2019 Lindsay Cosgrove Boorowa 2019 Dennis Osborne Boorowa 2019 John Cook Boorowa 2019 Sue Cook Boorowa 2019 Mick Hughes Boorowa 2019 Daryl Heath Boorowa 2019 Lesley Heath Boorowa 2019 Russell Good Boorowa 2019 John Peterson Boorowa 2019 Heather Bottomley Boorowa 2019 James Armstrong Boorowa 2019

Additional study contact information is provided in the Study Contact List. ,- . /0 1 22 3 4 2-2- -56 2 7 893: 9 0)! "/0 6 -# ABC 2-2- -56- 7 893: . Determine efficacy by demonstrating achievement of developmental milestone of sitting without support for at least 10 seconds up to 18 months of age as defined by WHO Motor Developmental .