2810 Industrial Parkway Santa María, CA 93455 VOICE 805 .
PrimusLabs.com2810 Industrial ParkwaySanta María, CA 93455VOICE 805.922.0055FAX 805.922.2462 January 22, 2010EMAIL Primus@primuslabs.comwww.primuslabs.comSR. MARCO CHAVESAGROPECUARIA MONTELIBANO S.A DE C.VPLc. 13CALLE PRINCIPAL BOCA CRUZSAN LORENZOHondurasDear SR.CHAVESOn January 09,2010 Karina Macedo Monteagudo an auditor subcontracted by Primuslabs.com, conducted an audit of yourgrowing operation based at the above address. The purpose of this audit was to assess the operation’s compliance with therequirements of the GLOBALGAP Program.As you are aware, in order to obtain certification to the GLOBALGAP Program, the General Regulations require 100%compliance with the items designated as Major Musts and 95% compliance with the items designated as Minor Musts.Attachment A contains a summary of the nonconformances that were found during the audit.The audit was scored as follows:# of ItemsMarked N/AMajor MustsTotal # ofCheckList Items7410# of ItemsIn Compliance64 of 64Minor Musts12510115 of372CategoryRecommended31 ofScore100%115100%3588.57 %The percentage of Recommended items is provided as information and does not affect your certification.Minor Must nonconformance corrective actions must be submitted within 28 days of the completion of the audit.Major Must nonconformances must be corrected prior to certification. Corrective actions for MajorMust nonconformances submitted greater than 90 days after the completion of the audit may require siteverification prior to acceptance and certification.Should you have any questions with regard to this report, please contact Hector Pedraza, at (805) 922-0055.Sincerely,Albert QuaglinoCertification Program Manager
PrimusLabs.com2810 Industrial ParkwaySanta María, CA 93455 VOICE 805.922.0055FAX 805.922.2462EMAIL Primus@primuslabs.comwww.primuslabs.comJanuary 22, 2010SR.MARCO CHAVESAGROPECUARIA MONTELIBANO S.A DE C.VPLc13CALLE PRINCIPAL BOCA CRUZSAN LORENZOHondurasDear SR.CHAVESCongratulations, PrimusLabs.com is pleased to inform you that the operation named above, which was auditedon January 09, 2010 . Meets the requirements for certification within the GLOBALGAP This certification willencompass the areas and commodities as shown on the enclosed certificate.You may use the GLOBALGAP logo on your business to business communications in accordance with therequirements of the GLOBALGAP Sublicensing and Certification Agreement and the GLOBALGAP GeneralRegulations.Again, congratulations for successfully meeting the above requirements. Should you have any questions, pleasecontact Hector Pedraza at your convenience at 805-922-0055.Sincerely,Hector PedrazaGLOBALGAP Program CoordinatorPrimuslabs.com
No. of Certification body: 0623GGN: 4049929013575Registration number: PLc 013CERTIFICATEAccording to GLOBALG.A.P. (EUREPGAP)General Regulations Integrated Farm Assurance Version 3.0Option 1Issued toAGROPECUARIA MONTELIBANO S.A DE C.VCALLE PRINCIPAL BOCA CRUZ, SAN LORENZO, (not specified), HondurasPrimuslabs.com declares that the production of the products mentioned on this certificate has been found to be complaint inaccordance with the standard:Scheme Control Points and Compliance Criteria Version 3.0Product NamesGLOBALGAP(EUREPGAP)Certificate No.ProduceHandlingHarvest 3-CCHNL-0002YESNOAuthorized by:Valid from: Jan 22, 2010Valid to : Jan 22, 2011ROBERT F. STOVICEKPresident, PrimusLabs.comDate of Certification Decision:Jan 22, 2010The actual status of this certificate is always displayed at: https://database.eurep.orgPlease see attached detailed list of farms certified for the above mentioned companyPrimusLabs.com2810 Industrial ParkwaySanta María, CA 93455(805) 922.0055 BUS(805) 922.2462 FAX1 800 779.1156 TOLL omPage 1 of 2
Annex For:AGROPECUARIA MONTELIBANO S.A DE C.VRegistration Number: PLc 013GlobalGAP Number (GGN): 4049929013575List of GLOBALGAP Certified Farms/FieldsOption: 1Farm Identifier: MONTELIBANOFields IdentifierMONTELIBANOCommodityMelonsSize ze (Has)88.76Fields IdentifierSANTA ROSACommodityMelonsSize (Has)645.78SANTA ROSAMelons145.40Farm Identifier: APACILAGUAFields IdentifierAPACILAGUAFarm Identifier: SANTA ROSAAlbert QuaglinoCertification Program Manger DateJan 22, 2010PrimusLabs.com2810 Industrial ParkwaySanta María, CA 93455(805) 922.0055 BUS(805) 922.2462 FAX1 800 779.1156 TOLL omPage 2 of 2
CHECKLISTPLc-13Control PointNo.Page 1 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010SectionCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESLevelComplies(yes/no)Comments / NA JustificationN/A1. RECORD KEEPING AND INTERNAL SELF-ASSESSMENT/INTERNAL INSPECTION1 Record Keeping and Internal Self-Assessment/Internal InspectionAF1.1Are all records requested during the external inspection accessibleand kept for a minimum period of time of two years, unless a longerrequirement is stated in specific control points?Minor MustYesAF1.2Does the producer or producer group take responsibility toundertake a minimum of one internal self-assessment or producergroup internal inspection, respectively, per year against theGLOBALGAP Standard?Major MustYesAF1.3Are effective corrective actions taken as a result ofnon-conformances detected during the internal self-assessment orinternal producer group inspections?Major XXXXXXXYes, they have record at the audit XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYes, they make changes in the production lot code and use a numerical codewith detail of the original lot name used in the past with the new SAP code forthe season 2009/2010.Yes, the internal report has been done on December 2009 for ranch labor withpacking operation, made by Marco Chaves/Manuel Rubio.Yes, at the audit time the grower keep detail of corrective action implemented .(Santa Rosa: FV 2.1.1, AF 3.1.1, 3.2.2, 3.3.2, CB 5.2.1, 5.6.2, 5.7.1, 8.1.7 ,8.2.9, 8.6.6, 8.7.12, 8.7.13, 8.7.15, 8.8.4, FV 2.1.1, 5.1.1, 5.8.6).2. SITE HISTORY AND SITE MANAGEMENT2.1 Site HistoryAF2.1.1Is a recording system established for each unit of production orother area/location to provide a permanent record of thelivestock/aquaculture production and/or agronomic activitiesundertaken at those locations? Are these records kept in anordered and up to date fashion?Major MustYesAF2.1.2Is a reference system for each field, orchard, greenhouse, yard,plot, livestock building or other area/location used in productionestablished and referenced on a farm plan or map?Minor MustYesYes, they have a map detailing lot, storage place and areas identified by theenvironmental impact (packing facility, empty pesticides areas, waste materialarea).2.2 Site ManagementAF2.2.1Is there a risk assessment for new agricultural sites (i.e. crop,livestock or aquaculture enterprises) or existing sites only whererisks have changed, which shows the site in question to besuitable for production, with regards to food safety, operatorhealth, the environment and animal heath where applicable?Major MustYes-Yes, documented for new lot of Santa Rosa ranch (Arenales 1: 1102-110) byorganic manure effect, domestic animal in adjacent land, wild life, and dusteffect. Apacilagua and Montelibano do not increase productive area.AF2.2.2Has a management plan been developed setting out strategies tominimise all identified risks, such as pollution or water tablecontamination? Are the results of this analysis recorded and usedto justify that the site in question is suitable?Minor MustYes-Yes, they make soil test, furrows, install solid barriers in the perimetral area,pruning trees of perimetral area among other labors.3.1 Rotations Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH,Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne); Germany Tel: 49-221-57993-25; Fax: 49-221-57993-56 http://www.globalgap.org
CHECKLISTPLc-13SectionControl PointNo.3.1Page 2 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010CBCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESIs there, where feasible, crop rotation for annual crops?LevelComplies(yes/no)Recomm.Yes-Yes, they keep part of year with melons and then corn to cut plague cycle(Santa Rosa, Montelibano, Apacilagua: watermelon parental seed material).Yes, they declare the use of Bromuro in part of Santa Rosa and Montelibanoranch, with authorization use by government of Honduras until 2012.Yes, they fulfill the pre planting period detailed in product label (from 7 day – 5month).Comments / NA JustificationN/A3. SOIL AND SUBSTRATE MANAGEMENT2.1 Soil FumigationFV2.1.1Is there a written justification for the use of soil fumigants?Minor MustYes-FV2.1.2Is any pre-planting interval complied with?Minor MustYes-2.2 SubstratesFV2.2.1Does the producer participate in substrate recycling programmesfor substrates where available?Recomm.Yes-Yes, they declare the use of imported substrate for green house operationmade on Montelibano ranch.FV2.2.2If chemicals are used to sterilise substrates for reuse, have thelocation, the date of sterilisation, type of chemical, method ofsterilisation, name of the operator and pre-planting interval beenrecorded?Major Must-N/AN/A, the operation does not reuse substrates (imported material withguarantee supplier).FV2.2.3For substrate of natural origin, can it be demonstrated that it doesnot come from designated conservation areas?Recomm.Yes-Yes, they use Canadian substrates with authorization use for green houselabor (Sunshine: MSDS emitted by SUNGRO HORTICULTURE).Have soil maps been prepared for the farm?Recomm.Yes-Yes, they keep data by soil texture by ranch on 2006.Have techniques been used that improve or maintain soil structure,and to avoid soil compaction?Recomm.Yes-Yes, they detail the use of drift irrigation, barrier crop, and plastic cover overfurrows to reduce wind effect (for all ranches). Liquid organic manureapplication plus molasses and subsolado on Apacilagua and Montelibano.Are field cultivation techniques used to reduce the possibility of soilerosion?Minor MustYes-Yes, they use natural and artificial barriers (mesh, green curtains) to reducethe wind effect, among of the drip irrigation.4. SOIL MANAGEMENT4.1 Soil MappingCB4.1.14.2 CultivationCB4.2.14.3 Soil ErosionCB4.3.15. WORKERS HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE3.1 Risk AssessmentsAF3.1.1Does the farm have a written risk assessment for safe and healthyworking conditions?Minor MustYesAF3.1.2Does the farm have a written health, safety and hygiene policyand procedures including issues of the risk assessment ofAF.3.1.1?Minor MustYesXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-Yes, developed for ranch labor: detail the effect of the incorrect use of PPE,risk of illness and disease on labor area/period, employees transport unit,made on November 02th 2009 by Reyna Navas and Andres Castro.Yes, documented for ranch and packing labor with detail of commitment of asafe work place (training, medical evaluation, PPE).3.2 Training Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH,Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne); Germany Tel: 49-221-57993-25; Fax: 49-221-57993-56 http://www.globalgap.org
CHECKLISTPLc-13LevelComplies(yes/no)AF3.2.1Is there a record kept for training activities and attendees?Minor MustYesAF3.2.2Do all workers handling and/or administering veterinary medicines,chemicals, disinfectants, plant protection products, biocides orother hazardous substances and all workers operating dangerousor complex equipment as defined in the risk assessment in AF3.1.1 have certificates of competence, and/or details of other suchqualifications?Major MustYesAF3.2.3Have all workers received adequate health and safety training andare they instructed according to the risk assessment in AF.3.1.1?Minor MustYesAF3.2.4Is there always an appropriate number of persons (at least oneperson) trained in first aid present on each farm wheneveron-farm activities are being carried out?Minor MustYesAF3.2.5Does the farm have documented hygiene instructions?Minor MustYesAF3.2.6Have all persons working on the farm received basic hygienetraining according to the hygiene instructions in AF.3.2.5?Minor MustYesAF3.2.7Are the farm’s hygiene procedures implemented?Minor MustYesAF3.2.8Are all subcontractors and visitors aware of the relevantprocedures on personal safety and hygiene?Minor MustYesControl PointNo.Page 3 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010SectionCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESComments / NA JustificationN/A-Yes, they keep training records detailing date, assistance, main topic, personin charge, material for internal training session.Yes, they have documented C.V of the agronomist engineer in charge of eachcrop protection program by ranch and the employee in chemical contact haveinternal training with formal support and records. (Apacilagua: Ramón Osorio,Santa Rosa: Pedro Mejía, Montelibano: Antonio Oviedo and Santiago XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Yes, they have record of internal training made by Mr. Marco Chaves, RamonXXXXXXXX Osorio and Osmin Majano (record detail full name, labor area, sign, date, HealthXXXXand Safe on work condition, Emergency/Accident procedure, Security crew,GMP, GAP made on December 10th 2009: 96 employees’ Apacilagua). Eachranch keeps record of internal and external training session for their chemicalcontact employees. Montelibano sep 9th 2009 (Food safety regulation,industrial security and storage place management0, Procedure toYes, they have first aid crew form by employees from different labor(supported by Victor Berrios – INFOP made on December 29th 2009 :Apacilagua). (Montelibano: 72 permanent and 400 season contracted: first aidcrew (January 11th 2008-December 28 2009: 12 person to support by eachranch area).Yes, they have a documented hygiene procedure for ranch and packing laborwith public panel at the entrance to labor areas.Yes, their record of internal training detail this session.XXXXXXXX Yes, at the entrance to each ranch they use a panel to inform ranch demandXXfor all employee/visit/subcontractor.Yes, they have an information panel at the entrance to each ranch and thesecurity personnel detail ranch condition during the visit or time on ranch.3.3 Hazards and First AidAF3.3.1Do accident and emergency procedures exist, are they visuallydisplayed and communicated to all persons associated with thefarm activities?Minor MustYesAF3.3.2Are potential hazards clearly identified by warning signs andplaced where appropriate?Minor MustYesAF3.3.3Is safety advice available/accessible for substances hazardous toworker health, when required?Minor MustYesAF3.3.4Are First Aid kits present at all permanent sites and in the vicinity offield-work?Minor MustYes-XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX-Yes, documented and published in the external wall of each chemical storeplace (Santa Rosa, Apacilagua, Montelibano), documented in the main manualand procedure of chemical handling area.Yes, they use warning signs to hazar d s c o m m u n i c a t i o n o n e a c h s t o r a g eplace: machinery, equipment and chemical place, electrical installation, fueltank, gas station.Yes, they have safety advice (warning signals, procedure, emergencyprocedure, MSDS, technical card) for chemicals, lubricants and oils.Yes, they have first aid kits in the packing facility, in the main ranch’s officeand portable units for ranch labor.3.4 Protective Clothing/Equipment Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH,Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne); Germany Tel: 49-221-57993-25; Fax: 49-221-57993-56 http://www.globalgap.org
CHECKLISTPLc-13LevelComplies(yes/no)AF3.4.1Are workers (including subcontractors) equipped with suitableprotective clothing in accordance with legal requirements and/orlabel instructions or as authorised by a competent authority?Major MustYesAF3.4.2Is protective clothing cleaned after use and stored so as to preventcontamination of the clothing or equipment?Major MustYesControl PointNo.Page 4 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010SectionCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESComments / NA JustificationN/A-Yes, they have PPE kit stored, at the audit time none sector is applied toverified the use, they keep PPE in separate area, used PPE were found inlaundry area.XXXXXXXX Yes, they application employee leave used PPE in laundry area next to showerXXXXXXXX area of applicators, in this area the employee hav e p e r s o n a l l o c k e r s f o rXXXXclothing. Each ranch has a laundry area for PPE of pesticides program.3.5 Worker WelfareAF3.5.1Is a member of management clearly identifiable as responsible forworkers health, safety and welfare?Major MustYes-Yes, the person in charge is Ariel Quesada for Apacilagua and Montelibano,Frank Maltez for Santa Rosa)AF3.5.2Do regular two way communication meetings take place betweenmanagement and workers ? Are there records from suchmeetings?Recomm.No-No, at the inspection time they do not have record of meeting with employees .Declares internal meeting every two months / ranch.AF3.5.3Is there information available that provide an accurate overviewover all workers of the farm?Minor MustYes-Yes, they keep employee information by ranch and packing operation.AF3.5.4Do workers have access to clean food storage areas, designateddining areas, hand washing facilities and drinking water?Minor MustYes-Yes, they have food temporary storage shadow area distributed in ranch.AF3.5.5Are on site living quarters habitable and have the basic servicesand facilities?Minor Must-N/AMinor MustYes-Yes, the producer work with their employees for ranch labor and k e e p asubcontractor list in electronic media with detail by supplier.Minor MustYes-Yes, they have a list of waste product detailed for ranch, well water, storageplace, maintenance labor, as the final use (reuse, recycle, externalmanagement).Recomm.Yes-Yes, developed by ranch with external support for biodiversity andenvironmental condition.N/A, the operation does not have living quarters in ranch.3.6 SubcontractorsAF3.6.1When the producer makes use of subcontractors, is all therelevant information available on farm?6. WASTE AND POLLUTION MANAGEMENT, RECYCLING AND RE-USE4.1 Identification of Waste and PollutantsAF4.1.1Have all possible waste products and sources of pollution beenidentified in all areas of the business?4.2 Waste and Pollution Action PlanAF4.2.1Is there a documented farm waste management plan to avoid orreduce wastage and pollution and avoid the use of landfill orburning, by waste recycling? Are organic wastes composted onthe farm and utilised for soil-conditioning, provided there is no riskof disease carry over?AF4.2.2Has this waste management plan been implemented?AF4.2.3Are the farm and premises clear of litter and waste to avoidestablishing a breeding ground for pests and diseases whichcould result in a food safety risk?AF4.2.4Do the premises have adequate provisions for waste disposal?Recomm.Yes-Yes, they segregate waste material for internal and external management.Major MustYes-Yes, they use metal containers with plastic bag and lit for waste material andkeep the ranch in clean condition.Recomm.Yes-Yes, they have areas for residues and garbage containers. Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH,Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne); Germany Tel: 49-221-57993-25; Fax: 49-221-57993-56 http://www.globalgap.org
CHECKLISTPLc-13Control PointNo.Page 5 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010SectionCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESLevelComplies(yes/no)Comments / NA JustificationN/A7. ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION5.1 Impact of Farming on the Environment and BiodiversityAF5.1.1Does each producer have a management of wildlife andconservation plan for the enterprise that acknowledges the impactof farming activities on the environment?Minor MustYes-Yes, they have a conservation plan for ranch, based on evaluation of naturalcondition, native biodiversity, effect of ranch and packing labor inenvironmental balance to preserve native wildlife.AF5.1.2Has the producer considered how to enhance the environment forthe benefit of the local community and flora and fauna?Recomm.Yes-Yes, their conservation plan details the commitment with the environmentthought rational use of pesticides, waste management, IPM, research.AF5.1.3Is this policy compatible with sustainable commercial agriculturalproduction and does it minimise environmental impact of theagricultural activity?Recomm.Yes-Yes, their protection plan is compatible with the ranch/packing production.AF5.1.4Does the plan include a baseline audit to understand existing animaland plant diversity on the farm?Recomm.Yes-AF5.1.5Does the plan include action to avoid damage and deterioration ofhabitats on the farm?Recomm.Yes-AF5.1.6Does the plan include activities to enhance habitats and increasebio-diversity on the farm?Recomm.Yes-Yes, the plan detail species found in ranch condition (vegetal, animal) withspecific analysis and evaluation by ranch in charge of an external adviser (CVdocumented for environmental evaluation).Yes, their commitment to reduce chemical use let them preserve the flora andfauna in better condition, fulfill with waste management plan, research to findtechniques that let them reduce chemical use.Yes, by biological corridor and protection of free chemical areas, researchand use of IPM program, reduce the use of methyl bromide among othertechniques.Recomm.Yes-Yes, they identified unproductive areas all sector adjacent to river, inApacilagua ranch they have an internal area remind of Mitch Hurricane thatfulfill the area of big rock, this sector are free of chemical application andprotected by natural forest/plant and fauna. For Montelibano the identified areanear to surface water body to natural species.Recomm.Yes-Yes, they have an internal report of daily consumption as detail of equipmentand the internal policy to avoid the energy use over the reactive limit.5.2 Unproductive SitesAF5.2.1Has consideration been given to the conversion of unproductivesites (e.g. low lying wet areas, woodlands, headland strip orareas of impoverished soil) to conservation areas for theencouragement of natural flora and fauna?5.3 Energy EfficiencyAF5.3.1Can the producer show monitoring of energy use on the farm?8. COMPLAINTS6 ComplaintsAF6.1Is there a complaint procedure available relating to issues coveredby the GLOBALGAP standard?Major MustYesAF6.2Does the complaints procedure ensure that complaints areadequately recorded, studied and followed up including a record ofactions taken?Major MustYesXXXXXXXX Yes, they have a documented procedure for complaints management in theXXXXXXXX GAP manual, for reception, internal evaluation (ranch/packing0, answer periodXXXXand customer information, keep a file of complaint 2009 by customer, product,ranch, topic without food safety incident.XXXXXXXX Yes, the procedure details identification of customer (complaint receptor) ,XXXXXXXX product (melon, watermelon, watermelon seed), date and result emitted to theXXXXXXXX customer (marketing office: San Lorenzo Valle each packing area) to close theXXXXXX complaint.9. TRACEABILITY Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH,Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne); Germany Tel: 49-221-57993-25; Fax: 49-221-57993-56 http://www.globalgap.org
CHECKLISTPLc-13Control PointNo.Page 6 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010SectionCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESLevelComplies(yes/no)Comments / NA JustificationN/A7 TraceabilityAF7.1Do all producers have a documented recall procedure to managethe withdrawal of registered products from the market?Major MustYes-CB1.1Is GLOBALGAP registered product traceable back to and trackablefrom the registered farm (and other relevant registered areas)where it has been grown?Major MustYesRecomm.Yes-Minor MustYes-Recomm.Yes-Yes, green material of in house nursery is free of pest and disease (melon :Montelibano).Minor MustYes-Yes, they keep quality control system as same as open field.Minor MustYes-Yes, the grower details the risk assessment done for soil, weather, pest anddisease by crop for ranch environment to select green material.-Yes, they have a documented recall procedure detailing the commitment tomake internal evaluation and report by the grower-producer recall team forranch and packing labor, detail recall class (I, II, III), customer recall team withcontact data and keep report of last mock recall made for chemicalcontamination with support of answer, time, date and final report closing themock recall. Customer partner of the evaluation: Mack Multiple, country: UK,close date: December 22th.XXXXXXXX Y e s , t h e i r t r a c e a b l e b a c k s y s t e m i d e n t i f i e s t h e f r u i t b y r a n c h , m o d u l e ,XXXXXXXX sector/crop, and then the finished product is identified by packing date and barXXXXXXXX code of pallets, data registered in the packing list of delivered fruit.XXXXXX10. PROPAGATION MATERIAL2.1 Quality and HealthCB2.1.1Is there a document that guarantees seed quality (free frominjurious pests, diseases, virus, etc.) ?CB2.1.2Are quality guarantees or certified production guaranteesdocumented for purchased propagation material?CB2.1.3Is purchased propagation material free of visible signs of pest anddisease?CB2.1.4Are plant health quality control systems operational for in-housenursery propagation?Yes, they have supplier guarantee (Nunhems for Galia variety seed, CaribeanGold and Florentino: Rick Swam) detailing crop, preventive treatment,phytosanitary certificate emitted by Israel. (Amaregal/Solarnet Galia variety,Watermelons: Hazera Seed Inc (Leopard variety, Abbot & Cobb for Honeydewmelons).Yes, their supplier gives them a guarantee letter by crop, variety with externalsupport and lab test report.2.2 Pest and Disease ResistanceCB2.2.1Does the producer consider pest and disease resistance/tolerancecharacteristics during variety selection?2.3 Chemical Treatments and DressingsCB2.3.1Is the use of seed/annual rootstocks treatments recorded?Minor MustYesCB2.3.2Are plant protection product treatments on in-house nurserypropagation material applied during the plant propagation periodrecorded?Minor MustYesMinor MustYesYes, as same as open field, for melon seed in the green house of Montelibanoranch, with detail of dated and deliver dates/ranch target.XXXXXXXX Yes, as same as open field in accordance of chemical label instruction.XXXXXXXXXXXX2.4 Sowing/PlantingCB2.4.1Does the producer keep records on sowing/planting methods,seed/planting rate, sowing/planting date?-Yes, this information is registered by ranch, crop and year.2.5 Genetically Modified Organisms Copyright: GLOBALGAP c/o FoodPLUS GmbH,Spichernstr. 55, 50672 Köln (Cologne); Germany Tel: 49-221-57993-25; Fax: 49-221-57993-56 http://www.globalgap.org
CHECKLISTCode Ref.: IFA 3.0-2 CPVersion: 3.0-2 Sep07Section: AF / CB / F&vALL FARM BASE / CROP BASE / FRUIT AND VEGETABLESPLc-13Page 7 of 20ENGLISH VERSIONAudit Date: 01/09/2010LevelComplies(yes/no)CB2.5.1Does the planting of or trials with GMO's comply with all applicablelegislation in the country of production?Major MustYes-CB2.5.2Is there documentation available when the producer is growinggenetically modified organisms?Minor Must-N/AYes, the national regulation (Honduras) not allow the GMO use for commercialproduction, and keep supplier guarantee (Nunhems: Galia seed) detail theproduction of green material since parental line without geneticallymodification.N/A, the grower does not use GMO material (melon, watermelon).CB2.5.3Did the producer inform their direct clients of the GMO status of theproduct?Major Must-N/AN/A, the grower does not use GMO material (melon, watermelon).CB2.5.4Is there a plan for handling GM material (crops and trials) settingout strategies to minimise contamination risks, such as accidentalmixing of adjacent non-GM crops and maintaining product integrity?Minor Must-N/AN/A, the grower does not use GMO material (melon, watermelon).CB2.5.5Are GMO crops stored separately from other crops to avoidadventitious mixing?Major Must-N/AN/A, the grower does not use GMO material (melon, watermelon).Recomm.Yes-Minor MustYesSectionControl PointNo.Comments / NA JustificationN/A1.1 Choice of variety or RootstockFV1.1.1Is the producer aware of the importance of effective crophusbandry in relation to the "mother crops" (i.e. the seed producingcrop) of the registered product crop?Yes, their internal adviser team selects crop, rotation and variety withtolerance to local disease or plague. They work with their in house nurseryoperation located in Montelibano ranch; they work with research area afterinternal pilot.11. FERTILISER USE5.1 Nutrient RequirementCB5.1.1Is the application of all fertilisers and manure timed to maximise theefficacy and/or uptake by target crops?XXXXXXXX Yes, they use fertilizers to keep nutritional balance and use product with highXXXXXXXX efficiency factor, all application in accordance to crop (melon, watermelon,XXXXvariety: Galia, Honeydew, Yellow Honeydew, Cantaloupe, Piel de Sapo andMini and regular seedless watermelon and phonological state.5.2 Advice on Quantity and Type of FertiliserCB5.2.1Are recommendations for application of fertilisers (organic orinorganic) given by competent, qualified advisers holding arecognised national certificate or similar? Do producers who useoutside professional help (advisers and consultants) regarding th
EMAIL Primus@primuslabs.com 2810 Industrial Parkway Santa María, CA 93455 Honduras On January 09,2010 Karina Macedo Monteagudo an auditor subcontracted by Primuslabs.com, conducted an audit of your growing operation based at the above address. The purpose of this audit was to assess the operation’s compliance with the
500324053005 reset ic max811seus t klm-2810 2 500324053006 assp ic ds2411r t&r klm-2810 1 500334002100 inductor nlc453232t-4r7k-pf klm-2810 2 500335400380 crystal cx-49g-24.576mhz klm-2810 1 500335400400 crystal cm200s 32.768khz klm-2810 1 500404001100 inductor blm18bb121sn1d klm-2810 1 500404001280 blm18bb470sn1d klm-2810 2
500324053005 reset ic max811seus t klm-2810 2 500324053006 assp ic ds2411r t&r klm-2810 1 500334002100 inductor nlc453232t-4r7k-pf klm-2810 2 500335400380 crystal cx-49g-24.576mhz klm-2810 1 500335400400 crystal cm200s 32.768khz klm-2810 1 500404001100 inductor blm18bb121sn1d klm-2810 1 500404001280 blm18bb470sn1d klm-2810 2
4 santa: ungodly santa & elves: happy all the time santa: when they sing until they’re bluish, santa wishes he were jewish, cause they’re santa & elves: happy all the time santa: i swear they're santa & elves: happy all the time santa: bizarrely happy all the time (elves ad lib: "hi santa" we love you santa" etc.) popsy:
Chicago, IL Mar 19 Los Angeles, CA Mar 20–21 Nashville, TN Mar 20 North East, MD Mar 24 Minneapolis, MN Mar 24 Chehalis, WA Mar 26 Kansas City, MO Mar 27 Atlanta, GA Mar 27 Salt Lake City, UT Mar 31 Canada Chilliwack, BC Mar 10–11 North Battleford, SK Mar 11 Grande Prairie, AB Mar 12
Chicago, IL Mar 19 Los Angeles, CA Mar 20 Nashville, TN Mar 20 North East, MD Mar 24 Minneapolis, MN Mar 24 Midland, TX (Kruse Energy) Mar 25 Canada Edmonton, AB Feb 25–27 North Battleford, SK Feb 28 Toronto, ON Mar 3–5 Chilliwack, BC Mar 10–11 North Battleford, SK Mar 11 International Moerdijk, NLD Mar 4–6 Polotitlan, MEX Mar 6
North Battleford, SK Apr 23 Edmonton, AB Apr 28-May 2 North Battleford, SK May 6 Edmonton, AB Jun 17-19 USA Denver, CO Mar 4 Fort Worth, TX Mar 10-11 Las Vegas, NV Mar 12-13 Columbus, OH Mar 17 Sacramento, CA Mar 18 Chicago, IL Mar 19 Los Angeles, CA Mar 20-21 Nashville, TN Mar 20 North East, MD Mar 24 Minneapolis, MN Mar 24
Aesthetic Design Guide Monroe Parkway I Bridges And Retaining Walls August 2010 1-6 Monroe Parkway Major Bridge (Local Road Over) - Plan View Local Road Over Monroe Parkway Median Free Standing Pylon (Typ.) Bridge Pier Monroe Parkway Retaining Wall (Typ.) Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike Lane Bike Lane Bridge End Column (Typ.) Traffi c Barrier Rail (Typ .
Grade 2 collected 25 books. Grade 3 collected 15 books. Grade 4 collected 10 books. The school had a book drive to support the local shelter. Grades 1, 2, 3, and 4 collected books. Organize the book data into the pictograph above. 1. Who collected the most books? _ 2. What was the total amount of books collected? _ 3. Which grade .
