Side Impact Test Results Using WS & ES2 In AE-MDB - UNECE
Informal Group on Harmonization of Side Impact Dummies9th meetingSide Impact Test Results usingWS & ES2 in AE-MDBSeptember 19, 2012Korea Automobile Testing & Research InstituteEun-Dok LEE Ph.D.
Program Overview Assessment of WorldSID dummy in vehicle crashenvironment. Test conditions- AE-MDB 1,300kg, 50km/h Comparison of WorldSID 50th and ES2 dummies- for Compact & Midsized vehicles (4 times)- Injury parameters, Rib deflections etc.Note : Test was conducted by a part of KATRI & HMCWorldSID & PSI Joint Research programSlide 2 of 21
Test SetupTest Condition & MatrixVehicleCompact vehicleMidsized vehicleGVW(kg)Dummy1,042ES21,039WS 50th1,528ES21,533WS 50th50km/hAE-MDB- Weight : 1,300kg- Honeycomb v3.9EuroNCAP test protocolSlide 3 of 21
Test SetupCompact vehicleSlide 4 of 21
Test SetupMidsized vehicleSlide 5 of 21
Test SetupCompact vehicleSlide 6 of 21
Test SetupCompact vehicleSlide 7 of 21
Test SetupMidsized vehicleSlide 8 of 21
Test SetupMidsized vehicleSlide 9 of 21
TestsCompact vehicleSlide 10 of 21
TestsMidsized vehicleSlide 11 of 21
TestsCompact vehicleSlide 12 of 21
TestsMidsized vehicleSlide 13 of 21
Test resultsCompact vehicleHeadShoulderThoraxPelvisMidsized vehicleES2WS 50thES2WS 50thHIC 36-84.0362.9363.1596.2Peak resultant 7.05-20.12-38.7Shoulder Rib Deflection(1)mmUpper Rib Deflection(2)mm32.47.0912.36.13Middle Rib Deflection(3)mm22.17.5710.09.6Lower Rib Deflection(4)mm22.511.8915.718.3Abdomen Rib1 Deflection(5)mm-16.66-20.6Abdomen Rib2 Deflection(6)mm-31.03-21.9Pubic Symphysis Force(Fy)kN2.111.22.481.37Slide 14 of 21
Test resultsHead results for Compact and midsized vehicle tests12010080HIC 3660Peak resultant Acceleration3ms exceedence40200ES2 CWS CES2 MWS MSlide 15 of 21
Test resultsThorax results for compact and midsized vehicle tests35302520Upper Rib Deflection(2)Middle Rib Deflection(3)15Lower Rib Deflection(4)1050ES2 CWS CES2 MWS MSlide 16 of 21
Test resultsPelvis results for compact and midsized vehicle testsPubic Symphysis Force(Fy)32.521.5Pubic Symphysis Force(Fy)10.50ES2 CWS CES2 MWS MSlide 17 of 21
Test result AnalysisCompact vehicleShoulder Rib Deflection(1)mmMidsized vehicleES2WS 50thES2WS 50th-20.12-38.7Upper Rib Deflection(2)mm32.47.0912.36.13Middle Rib Deflection(3)mm22.17.5710.09.6Lower Rib Deflection(4)mm22.511.8915.718.3Conversion* Source : Dynamic side impact testing wit the 50th percentilemale WorldSID compared to the ES2re, Allison E. Louden(NHTSA)Matching positionES2for RibCompact vehicleWS 50thUpper RibShoulder RibMiddle RibUpper RibLower RibMiddle RibShoulder Rib Deflection(1)mmMidsized vehicleES2WS 50thES2WS 50th32.420.1212.338.7Upper Rib Deflection(2)mm22.17.0910.06.13Middle Rib Deflection(3)mm22.57.5715.79.6Lower Rib Deflection(4)mm-11.89-18.3Slide 18 of 21
Test result Analysis35306025Upper RibDeflection(2)20Middle RibDeflection(3)15Except this50Lower RibDeflection(4)105Side Pole Test400ES2 C WS C ES2 M WS Mshoulder Rib Deflection(1)Before Conversion30Upper Rib Deflection(2)Middle Rib Deflection(3)20100ES2 CWS CES2 MWS MES PWS PAfter ConversionSlide 19 of 21
Summary Thoracic Injury responses (e.g location of maximum Ribdeflections) of WorldSID and ES2 dummy are notconsistent with each crash test. This seems due to the differences of seatingposition & posture, dummy heights etc After aligned with heights of rib locations, the locationof maximum rib deflection may consistent with two WS& ES2 dummies It is needed to collect more crash test data and research to verifythis resultsSlide 20 of 21
Thank youfor your attention!eundok@ts2020.krSlide 21 of 21
Test result Analysis Compact vehicle Midsized vehicle ES2 WS 50th ES2 WS 50th Shoulder Rib Deflection(1) mm - 20.12 - 38.7 Upper Rib Deflection(2) mm 32.4 7.09 12.3 6.13 Middle Rib Deflection(3) 22.1mm 7.57 10.0 9.6 Lower Rib Deflection(4) mm 22.5 11.89 15.7 18.3 ES2 thWS 50 Upper R
4. 12 Meter (40') Drop Within Test 5. Fast Cook-Off Within Test 6. Slow Cook-Off Within Test 7. Bullet Impact Within Test 8. Fragment Impact Within Test 9. Sympathetic Detonation Within Test 10. Shaped Charge Jet Impact Within Test 11. Spall Impact Within Test 12. Specialty Within Test 13. Specialty Within Test 14. Specialty Within Test 15 .
ACCESSORIES (ORDERED SEPARATELY) Catalog Number Description ASL1-HSS-90-B-XXX 1 House Side Shield Back 90 deg ASL1-HSS-90-F-XXX 1 House Side Shield Front 90 deg ASL1-HSS-90-S-XXX 1 House Side Shield Side 90 deg ASL1-HSS-270-BSS-XXX 1 House Side Shield Back, Side & Side 270 deg ASL1-HSS-270-FSS-XXX 1 House Side Shield Front, Side & Side 270 deg .
side”. The side of the glass that was facing up is referred to as the “air side”. When you fire float glass in a kiln the results can be affected by whether the tin side was fired facing up or facing down. To be able to control results, you will want to test to identify which is the tin side and which is the air side. Ways to Test for Tin .File Size: 1MB
Southwest Side Sid Central e Southeast Side Central Legend 17.4 Southeast South West Side Side South 20.5 Central 20.6 North Side 20.9 South Side 22.2 West Side 24 0 E t C t l Central 24.0 East Central 24.3 South Central 26.7 Northeast Side 35.3 Southwest Central
Control Test Troubleshooting If a control level test is out of range: ØREPEAT CONTROL level test If control level test results are AGAIN out of range: ØOPEN a New Control vialand run test If control test results CONTINUE to be out of range: ØOpen a New Strip vial and run test If control test results are STILL out of range: Call Point of Care at ext. 1679 or the Bay Ridge .
table 8.2 – latency testing: 4 routers (lab) 104 table 8.3 – failure case test results 108 table 8.4 – latency and jitter test results 122 table 8.5 – stability and thru faults test results 122 table 8.6 – in-zone fault test results 123 table 8.7 – bias restraint test results 123
tests are the impact tension, puncture, explosive bulge test, the Robertson test, the Esso test and the Nayy tear test. The Charpy Impact Test which was developed in 1905 by French scientist Georges Charpy is the most common test and widely applied in industry since it is easy to prepare and conduct and results can be obtained quickly and cheap.
3.4.1 Slump Test 46 3.5 Machine Mechanical Properties 47 3.5.1 Concrete Compressive Test 47 3.5.2 Steel Tensile Test 48 3.5.3 Pull Out Test 49 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 51 4.1 Introduction 51 4.2 Results of Material Test 52 4.2.1 Trial Mix 52 4.2.2 Slump Test 52 4.3 Results on Mechanical Properties Test 53
