INVESTIGATING AFFF USEAT A REGIONAL AIRPORTMICHAEL NAHMIASSTATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCESDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATIONWASTE MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION DIVISIONSITES MANAGEMENT SECTIONDATE OF PRESENTATION:MARCH 7, 20191
AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAMS (AFFF) AFFF is a concentrate that is blended with water to createa foam that is intended for fighting high-hazard liquid fires Of most concern are PFAS-containing Class B AFFFSource: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2018.PFAS Fact Sheets PFAS-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology& Regulatory Council, PFAS Team. www.itrcweb.org.
AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAM (AFFF) Only 3% of fluorochemical production is for AFFF 75% of AFFF production used by military 25% used by oil refineries, municipal airports, firestations, tank farms Complex, proprietary mixtures PFASs a few % in mixture but still g/L levels Brief history Mid 1960s – 1970: 3M sole source supplier of AFFF 1973: National Foam 1976: Ansul 1994 to present: Angus, Chemguard, Fire Service PlusBottom line multiple AFFFs used at most sitesSlide courtesy of ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council)3
WHERE CLASS B AFFF IS IN SERVICE/DISCHARGED: Chemical Plants Flammable liquid storage and processing facilities Larger Airports (aircraft rescue and firefighting, hangars)* State HAZMAT Team Military Facilities* Fire Training Facilities Local Fire Departments Merchant Operations (oil tankers, offshore platforms)* Currently required to use AFFF that meets the requirements of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)Military Specification (MILSPEC) “Fire Extinguishing Agent, Aqueous Film-Forming Foam”Source: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2018. PFAS Fact Sheets PFAS-1. Washington,D.C.: Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, PFAS Team. www.itrcweb.org.
INVESTIGATING AFFF USE IN VERMONT Search the Vermont Spill Program’s spill reports for hazardousmaterial fires, tanker fires, and other rollovers and crashes Identify military bases that have fire fighting capabilities Vermont Air National Guard Camp Ethan Allen Training SiteIdentify FAA Part 139 Airports in the State Burlington International Airport (BTV) Rutland Southern Vermont Regional Airport (RUT) Identify fire training centers in the State Monitor incoming spill reports for accidentswith fires that may have had AFFF releasesas part of the emergency response5
FAA PART 139AIRPORT OPERATING CERTIFICATE Part 139 Airports have operatingcertificates from the FAA thatrequire certain safety andservice requirements, including: FuelingFacilities CertainTerminalRequirements NightOperations AircraftRescue and FireFighting (ARFF)6
AIRCRAFT RESCUE & FIRE FIGHTING (ARFF)REQUIREMENTS AT FAA PART 139 AIRPORTS Must have onsite ARFF capabilitiesincluding a pumper truck The pumper truck must be full ofClass B AFFF at all times Required to use AFFF that meetsthe DoD MILSPEC for AqueousFilm-Forming Foam Airport must keep enough AFFFonsite to fill the truck 3 times inthe event of an emergency7
FAA-MANDATED AFFF ANDEMERGENCY RESPONSE TESTING Each year, the FAA requires testing of the ARFFequipment, the AFFF, and First Responders ARFF Equipment Testing: AFFF Testing: The pumper truck has its turrets and hand valvesopened to ensure they effectively spray foamThe AFFF is tested to ensure it has the appropriatesurface tension, expansion ratio, and other criteriaEmergency Response Testing: First Responders are tasked with responding to a mockemergency on the airfield. When they arrive on thescene, they are timed as to how long it takes for themto set up on a scene and run the pumps8
DOES YOUR AIRPORT HAVEONE OF THESE?H2O Capacity: 300 gallonsAFFF Capacity: 40 gallons9
OR ONE OF THESE?H2O Capacity: 1,250 gallonsAFFF Capacity: 130 gallons10
FAA LISTING OFPART 139 AIRPORTShttps://www.faa.gov/airports/airport safety/part139 cert/Part 139Airportsby StateRI1VT2NH2ME4CT4MA9NY24FL26CA & TX3011
POTENTIAL AREAS OF CONCERN - AIRPORT AFFF Storage Areas Areas on the airfield where AFFF was applied as part of anemergency response (ie. plane crashes) Firefighting training areas, burn pits, or other areas where AFFFmay have been discharged as part of training Areas where AFFF was discharged as part of FAA testing Areas where AFFF was loaded or removed from ARFF vehiclesduring maintenance Historical disposal areas Airport stormwater system discharge points Pipeline terminals/bulk storage areas Hangars with engineered fire suppression systems using AFFFSource: ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program). 2017. ACRP Research Report 173.Use and Potential Impacts of AFFF Containing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs)at Airports. National Academy of Sciences. http://www.trb.org/ACRP/Blurbs/175866.aspx
Source: ACRP (Airport Cooperative Research Program). 2017. ACRP Research Report 173. Use andPotential Impacts of AFFF Containing Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) at Airports. National13Academy of Sciences. http://www.trb.org/ACRP/Blurbs/175866.aspx
RUTLAND SOUTHERN VERMONT REGIONAL AIRPORTLocated inClarendon, VT14
BEFORE THE AIRPORT 1893Rutland, VT QuadrangleUSGS 15 Minute SeriesPresent Day Location ofthe Rutland SouthernVermont Regional Airport15
BEFORE THE AIRPORTPictures are courtesy of the Historical Society of Clarendon Vermont16
AIRPORT CONSTRUCTIONBegins in 1942Pictures are courtesy of the Historical Society of Clarendon Vermont17
18
RUTLAND AIRPORT - 194619
GEOLOGY Bedrock – Two Types: Surficial Geology: Recessional moraine deposits on most of the site Kame moraine deposits with sand deposits and icecontact outwash gravel in the eastern part of the site20N
GEOLOGYN
CLARENDONGORGEBEDROCKOUTCROPS22
DRINKING WATER WELLSNEAR THE AIRPORTWithin 1/4-mile of airport: 83 Private Wells 5 Public Wells (3 at airport) 2 Source Protection Areas*Otter Creek *both located on airport property Within 1-mile of airport: 253 Private Wells 9 Public Wells 3 Source Protection AreasN
WHEN DID THE AIRPORT START USING AFFF?Before the August 6, 1986 Crash & Fire Learjet took off from the wrongrunway (too short) Plane went thru fence at end of therunway and came to rest in a field onthe other side of Route 7B The plane was carrying 1,000lbs ofJet Fuel Fire broke out and was extinguishedwith AFFF According to fire officials the planewas covered in AFFF throughout thesalvage operation as wellLEARJET 5524
AUGUST 7, 1986RUTLAND HERALD ARTICLE
AVIATION ACCIDENT RESEARCH Review NTSB Aviation Accident Databasehttps://www.ntsb.gov/ layouts/ntsb.aviation/index.aspx Doesn’t always pinpoint the exact location of the crash Doesn’t specifically indicate if AFFF was applied Interview First Responders Talk to Airport Employees Talk to Residents & Town Officials Review Historic Newspapers State Police Reports are also available26
AIRPORT AFFF OPERATIONSARFFBuildingMain AFFFTesting Area27N
AIRPORT AFFF OPERATIONSMain AFFFTesting AreaRutland AirportWater System WellxxxARFFBuildingxAirport Business ParkWater System WellsNx28
WATER SUPPLY TESTING SUMMARY 77 Bedrock supply wells sampled PFAS detections in 25 wells 4 Springs sampled; 2 with PFAS VGES Treatment systems installed on 8 bedrock supply wells 5Residential Point of Entry Treatment (POET) Systems 1Agricultural POET Airport Business Park Water Treatment System (2 wells)Furthest wells with detections are 1-½ milessouthwest of the Airport29
30N
Business Park Water System WellsMarch 2018Well #1(ng/L)Well #2(ng/L)Perfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA)1928Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)1617Perfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA)1.82.7Perfluorobutanesulfonic Acid (PFBS)14ND 1.8Perfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS)1404.5Perfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS)266.1Perfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)4583202.846.8TOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHA *N* NOTE: As of the date of this presentation (March 7, 2019), the VermontDrinking Water Health Advisory (DWHA) is 20 parts per trillion (ppt) forthe sum of PFHpA, PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS, and PFOS.
AIRPORT BUSINESS PARKWATER SYSTEM PFAS Contamination Discovered in March 2018 Bottled water and water totes provided tobusinesses and industries in the park Engineered treatment system constructed Average Daily Demand approx. 3,000 gal/day Granulated Activated Carbon-based system 4-48”x72” vessels that contain 54ft3 of GAC‘Do Not Drink’ Order lifted on Sept. 1, 201832
Bedrock Supply Well – 165ft Deep ConcentrationPerfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA) 22 ng/LSELECT RESIDENTIALSUPPLY WELL RESULTSPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) 16 ng/LPerfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA) 79 ng/LPerfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS) 3.6 ng/LPerfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA) 45 ng/LPerfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS) 7.1 ng/LPerfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA) 4.5 ng/LBedrock Supply Well ConcentrationPerfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA) 3.2 ng/LPerfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA) 28 ng/LTOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHA 59.2 ng/L33N
Bedrock Supply Well – Depth ptanoic Acid (PFHpA)2.4 ng/LPerfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA)19 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)6.3 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)3.8 ng/LPerfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)4.4 ng/LPerfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS)4.5 ng/LPerfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS)2.4 ng/LPerfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)61 ng/LPerfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)3.7 ng/LPerfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS)2.5 ng/LPerfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS)12 ng/L34TOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHA29.8 ng/LTOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHA24.4 ng/L
LearjetCrashSite35
JUNE 2002: TWO PLANECRASHES IN ONE MONTH!Both of these crashes did not have firesas a result of the crashAFFF was applied as a precautionExact locations of these crashes weredifficult to find through research*Local fire departments could applynon-military spec foam on crashes36Articles from the Rutland Herald
GARAGECRASH?BARNSpring at BarnConcentrationPerfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA)120 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)70 ng/LPerfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS)3.8 ng/LPerfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)140 ng/LPerfluorononanoic Acid (PFNA)8.6 ng/LPerfluorobutane Sulfonic Acid (PFBS)1.7 ng/LTOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHA202.4 ng/LGarage Bedrock Supply Well (445ft)ConcentrationPerfluorobutanoic Acid (PFBA)6.0 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)3.0 ng/LBarn Bedrock Supply Well (480ft)ConcentrationPerfluoropentanoic Acid (PFPeA)2.1 ng/LPerfluoroheptanoic Acid (PFHpA)30 ng/LPerfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS)4.3 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA)13 ng/LPerfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)1.9 ng/LPerfluorohexane Sulfonic Acid (PFHxS)3.8 ng/LPerfluorooctane Sulfonic Acid (PFOS) 2.0 ng/LPerfluorohexanoic Acid (PFHxA)38 ng/LTOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHATOTAL PFAS INCLUDED IN DWHA46.8 ng/L9.3 ng/L
June 21, 2002June 1, 2002Legend:Plane Crash - Confirmed AFFF AppliedPlane Crash – Unknown if AFFF AppliedLocations Approximate or Unknown (*)AVIATIONACCIDENTHISTORY MAPAugust 6, 1986October 28, 2014*April 28, 1996July 4, 1991*December 31, 2012March 20, 1987N
SITE INVESTIGATION CHALLENGES39
SITEINVESTIGATIONCHALLENGES OFFSITESOURCES?BACKGROUNDCONDITIONS?- Soil Sample Location40
CONCENTRATIONSOF PFAS INSURFACE SOILSConcentrations reported asnanograms per kilogram – ng/kgAirportTaxiwayLower ClarendonGorge State ForestPerfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA)ND 270ND 103.64Perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS)ND 270ND 6.82Perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA)ND 210ND 69.53Perfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)ND 210ND 7.81Perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS)ND 270740.54Perfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA)ND 270197.23Perfluoroheptane sulfonic acid (PFHpS)ND 270Not AnalyzedPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)ND 270375.02Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS)ND 270475.84Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)ND 270105.94Perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA)ND 27037.07Perfluorodecanesulfonic acid (PFDS)ND 27028.93Perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnA)ND 27069.61Perfluorododecanoic acid (PFDoA)ND 270ND 10.83Perfluorotridecanoic acid (PFTrDA)ND 270ND 13.01Not Analyzed49.37Perfluorooctadecanoic acid (PFODA)
ARFF BUILDING GROUNDWATERMONITORING WELL MW-1SAnalyteConcentrationPerfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA)740 ng/LPerfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS)9.9 ng/LPerfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA)2,900 ng/LPerfluoropentane sulfonic acid (PFPeS)Not AnalyzedPerfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)1,700 ng/LPerfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS)460 ng/LPerfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA)1,100 ng/LPerfluoroheptane sulfonic acid (PFHpS)69 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)340 ng/LPerfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS)760 ng/LPerfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)6.1 ng/LPerfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA)426:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS)ND1,200 ng/L
MAIN FIRE TESTING AREAMONITORING WELL MW-3SAnalyteConcentrationPerfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA)1,200 ng/LPerfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS)3.3 ng/LPerfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA)4,300 ng/LPerfluoropentane sulfonic acid (PFPeS)Not AnalyzedPerfluorohexanoic acid (PFHxA)2,500 ng/LPerfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS)41 ng/LPerfluoroheptanoic acid (PFHpA)1,200 ng/LPerfluoroheptane sulfonic acid (PFHpS)2.3 ng/LPerfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)500 ng/LPerfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS)6.6 ng/LPerfluorononanoic acid (PFNA)73 ng/LPerfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA)436:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonic acid (6:2 FTS)ND1,100 ng/L
NEXT STEPS Assess the potential foradditional contributing sources Investigate stormwaterdischarge areas Investigate additional foamtesting area Install additional groundwatermonitoring wells Surface water sampling Bedrock Geologic Mapping Surficial Geologic Mapping Geophysical Logging of BedrockWells Groundwater and Surface WaterChemistry Studies44
MICHAEL NAHMIASSTATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCESDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATIONWASTE MANAGEMENT & PREVENTION DIVISIONSITES MANAGEMENT SECTIONEMAIL: MICHAEL.NAHMIAS@VERMONT.GOVWEBSITE: HTTPS://DEC.VERMONT.GOV/Photo courtesy of the VermontDepartment of Fish & Wildlife
AQUEOUS FILM FORMING FOAMS (AFFF) AFFF is a concentrate that is blended with water to create a foam that is intended for fighting high -hazard liquid fires Of most concern are PFAS -containing Class B AFFF Source: ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council). 2018. PFAS Fact Sheets PFAS-1. Washington, D.C.: Interstate Technology
Aqueous film -forming foam (AFFF): legacy PFOS AFFF, legacy flurotelomer AFFF, modern flurotelomer AFFF Protein foam Alcohol-resistant AFFF (AR- AFFF) Alcohol-resistant protein foam (AR -P) Film-forming fluoroprotein (FFFP) Synthetic fluorine -free foam (FFF) Alcohol-resistant film -form fluoroprotein foam (AR -FFFP)
Report 173: Use and Potential Impacts of AFFF Contain PFASs at Airports 2017 72% of airports performed firefighting training using AFFF Of those, 79% discharged AFFF onto the ground . film forming foam (AFFF). Publication date: 2019? Fluorine Free Foams Cost Current AR-AFFF 200/5-gal Fluorine Free 200- 400 .
Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) and Alcohol Resistant Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AR-AFFF): AFFF and AR-AFFF are the most commonly used foams available today, with the AR version making it the most versatile foam as well. AFFF is synthetic foam with the basic elements being fluorochemical surfactants, hydrocarbon surfactants, and solvents.
examine the effects of AFFF on TCE dechlorination and to test the ability of AFFF to support dechlorination as a carbon source and electron donor, 300 μL of either Ansul, 3M, or National Foam AFFF (neat product) were amended to 100 mL of growth medium containing approximately 25 30 μmoles of TCE. The AFFF was subsampled from aerobic stock .
PFAS chemicals are the basis of aqueous film forming foam (AFFF), which is used as a fire suppressant. DoD started using AFFF in the 1970s because AFFF is an efficient method to extinguish aircraft fuel fires. 6. AFFF has been used on military bases for emergencies, for training exercises, and for equipment
issues associated with Defence use of Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). Fire fighting foams, such as AFFF, are used primarily to control fires involving flammable liquids such as fuel and oil. AFFF suppresses fire by producing a film over the fuel/oil fire that effectively starves the fire of oxygen.
cookware, and aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) used to contain jet fuel blazes. Along with industrial discharge, the regular use of AFFF for firefighter training and equipment testing contributes the most in elevating PFAS concentrations for a given area. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals Exposure to long-chain PFAS chemicals can increase
more than 25 battle-related casualties took place in 28 different countries. Eleven conflicts inflicted more than 1,000 battle casualties (Gleditsch et al., 2002). Explanations for the outbreak of conflicts are diverse. The purpose of this study is to test claims that youth bulges – extraordinary large youth cohorts relative to