Using IoT Technology To Create Smart Work Zones - NCDOT

1y ago
3 Views
1 Downloads
1.69 MB
65 Pages
Last View : 23d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ciara Libby
Transcription

Using IoT Technology to Create SmartWork ZonesErol Ozan, PhDDepartment of Technology SystemsEast Carolina UniversityNCDOT Project 2019-24FHWA/NC/2019-24July 2020

Using IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones

TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE1. Report No.FHWA/NC/2019-243. Recipient’s Catalog No.2. Government Accession No.4. Title and SubtitleUsing IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones5. Report DateJuly 31, 20206. Performing Organization Code7. Author(s)Erol Ozan, Ph.D. (principal investigator)Graduate Assistants: Yuanyuan Fu, Brian Dunn8. Performing Organization Report No.9. Performing Organization Name and AddressEast Carolina UniversityCollege of Engineering and Technology, Department of Technology Systems, Science andTechnology Building, Greenville, NC 2785810. Work Unit No.12. Sponsoring Agency Name and AddressNorth Carolina Department of TransportationResearch and Development Unit104 Fayetteville StreetRaleigh, North Carolina 2760113. Type of Report and Period CoveredFinal Report8/1/2018 – 7/31/202011. Contract or Grant No.14. Sponsoring Agency Code2019-2415. Supplementary Notes16. AbstractThis study explores the feasibility of improving road work zone safety by using state-of-the-art Internet of Things (IoT), artificial intelligence(AI), and computer vision technologies. This project included in-depth analysis of the key technologies and systems that have the potential toimprove work zone safety. In order to gain an understanding of the major triggers of the most harmful crashes in work zones, the project teamanalyzed the crash data in North Carolina. Driven by insights gained through an extensive literature review and the analysis of North Carolinawork zone crash data, this project developed two proof-of-concept systems using IoT, AI, and computer vision technologies for work zonesafety. The developed systems provide capabilities for two functions: (1) work zone intrusion warning and (2) vehicle queue detection. Theproof-of-concept intrusion alert system comprised a mobile device attached on a tripod to monitor a restricted area and a system to alert theworkers when an intrusion occurs. The workers receive alerts instantly through alarm sounds and vibrations generated by their mobile devices.The systems were tested using a simulated test environment and the findings of the tests indicated their potential to provide a robust technicalapproach. A proof-of-concept queue warning system was also developed and tested. The results indicated its potential to be used in smart workzones as a low-cost and easy-to-deploy system. Both systems were implemented with the capability to run on Android smartphones. However,the software is extremely portable, and therefore, the technical design can be embedded in any type of hardware. This report also identifiesthree commercially available devices that have good potential to be used in the field as part of a smart work zone to improve the work zonesafety.17. Key WordsSmart work zone, artificial intelligence, Internet of things, queue detection, work zone intrusionalert19. Security Classif. (of this report)UnclassifiedForm DOT F 1700.7 (8-72)18. Distribution Statement20. Security Classif. (of this page)Unclassified21. No. of Pages65Reproduction of completed page authorized22.Price

DISCLAIMERThe contents of this report reflect the views of the author and not necessarily the views of EastCarolina University. The author is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the datapresented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of eitherthe North Carolina Department of Transportation or the Federal Highway Administration at thetime of publication. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThe research team acknowledges the North Carolina Department of Transportation forsupporting and funding this project. We extend our thanks to the project Steering andImplementation Committee members:Lisa PennySteve KiteKarmen DaisKenneth ThornewellKelly WellsAuref AslamiBen ThurkillJacob BlevinsJarvis GrayJustin BeaverLevi RegaladoMarcos GutierrezMatthew CouchonStephen WardleSteven MinnickWe would like to thank Timothy Nye and Shawn Troy for providing the North Carolina WorkZone crash data.

Executive SummaryThis study explores the feasibility of improving road work zone safety by using state-of-the-artInternet of things (IoT), artificial intelligence (AI), and computer vision technologies. Thisproject included an in-depth analysis of the key technologies and methods that have the potentialto improve work zone safety. The report also explains and illustrates how existing and emergingwork zone safety systems and methods are typically implemented through a number of cases. Italso reports the development of two proof-of-concept systems geared toward the needs oftoday’s smart work zones and the evaluation of their effectiveness and reliability through labexperiments.In order to gain an understanding of the major triggers of the most harmful crashes in workzones, the project team analyzed crash data from North Carolina. The team also conducted athorough literature review to determine the current state of practice in smart work zoneimplementations in the United States together with the technical capabilities of the mostprominent products on the market. The findings of those research activities led the team to focuson two core smart work zone elements: queue detection and work zone intrusion detection.Queue detection is a key technology in many smart work zone applications, such as dynamiclane merge systems and queue warning systems. Intrusion detection is a key element of systemsthat protect workers from vehicles entering into restricted work areas. This report identifies threecommercially available devices that can have the greatest potential to be used in the field as partof a smart work zone to improve the work zone safety.Driven by the insights gained through the literature review and from the analysis of the NorthCarolina work zone crash data, two proof-of-concept systems were developed using IoT, AI, andcomputer vision technologies for work zone safety. The developed systems provide capabilitiesfor two functions: (1) work zone intrusion warning and (2) vehicle queue detection. The first ofthese systems is a proof-of-concept intrusion alert system, comprising a mobile device attachedon a tripod to monitor the restricted area and that runs a software application designed to alertworkers when an intrusion occurs. The workers receive alerts instantly through sounds andvibrations generated by their mobile devices. The system was tested in a simulated test

environment and the findings of the tests indicated its good potential to provide a robusttechnical approach to improving work zone safety. The second system is a proof-of-conceptqueue warning system, which was also developed and tested as part of this project. The resultsindicated it had significant potential to be used in smart work zones as a low-cost and easy-todeploy system. Both systems were implemented to run on Android smartphones. However, thesoftware is extremely portable, and therefore the efficient technical design means it can beembedded in any type of hardware.

Table of Contents1.Introduction . 11.1.Research Need Definition . 21.2.Research Objectives . 32.Literature Review. 43.Analysis of the North Carolina Work Zone Crash Data . 84.Analysis of the Key Smart Work Zone Technologies . 155.4.1.Queue Warning Systems . 154.2.Dynamic Late Merge Systems . 184.3.Intrusion Detection and Warning Systems . 194.4.Mobile App Alerts . 234.5.Smart Work Zone Component Vendors . 244.6.Key findings of the Analysis. 25Proof of Concept Systems for Smart Work Zones. 265.1.Proof of Concept System for Work Zone Intrusion Detection and Warning System . 295.2.Proof of Concept System for Queue Detection. 365.3.Summary of the Findings of the Proof of Concept System Development . 406.Recommendations . 417.Conclusions and Future Work . 45References . 478.Appendix . 508.1.Control logic configurations in select smart work zones . 508.2.Test Results for the proof of concept work zone intrusion system . 538.3.Test Results for proof of concept queue detection system . 55

List of FiguresFigure 1 Areas of a Road Work Zone . 4Figure 2 General Structure of a Queue Warning System . 16Figure 3 A typical layout for the zipper merge treatments . 18Figure 4 Scoping need’s for Intrusion Warning System . 20Figure 5 Software Development Process . 26Figure 6 Elements of the user interface . 27Figure 7 Detector position and detection area in a work zone . 29Figure 8 Polygons are drawn on the device's screen to designate the area that needs to bemonitored for intrusions . 30Figure 9 Simplified algorithm for proof of concept work zone intrusion detection and alertgeneration . 32Figure 10 Proof of Concept Work Zone Intrusion Detection and Warning System Architecture 32Figure 11 Proof of Concept Queue Detection System Architecture . 37Figure 12 Recommended selection of the polygon area for queue detection . 37Figure 13 Recommended polygon selection for detecting queues within only on lane . 38Figure 14 Simplified algorithm for the proof of concept queue detection and alert generation . 39

List of TablesTable 1 Examples of Smart Work Zone Costs. 7Table 2 Breakdown of the incidents according to the crash severity . 9Table 3 Time of work zone crashes . 9Table 4 Impact of the light conditions . 10Table 5 Impact of the first harmful event . 10Table 6 Breakdown of crashes according to work zone types . 11Table 7 Active versus non active work zones at the time of crashes . 12Table 8 Breakdown of the crashes according to their position within the work zone . 12Table 9 Analysis of Unit 1's maneuver during the work zone crashes . 13Table 10 Typical messages to be displayed on PCMS (TxDOT, 2018) . 16Table 11 Comparison of work zone intrusion alert products. . 22Table 12 Recommended criteria for identifying the detection zone for the proof of concept workzone intrusion alert system. 30Table 13 Detection speeds recorded with different devices . 33Table 14 Recommended sensor placement characteristics . 35Table 15 Summary of the performance tests for the proof of concept work zone intrusion alertsystem . 36Table 16 Summary of the performance tests for the proof of concept queue detection system . 40Table 17 Recommended Smart Work Zone Products. 42Table 18 Sensors and control logic used in smart work zone examples . 50Table 19 Test results (accuracy of proof of concept intrusion detection alert system) . 53Table 20 Test results (accuracy of the proof of concept queue detection system) . 55

1. IntroductionWork zone crashes constitute a significant problem in the United States (US). In 2013, 579fatalities and 32,719 serious crashes occurred in the US. Work zones also have a significantimpact on the efficiency of the roadway networks. It has been reported that highway work zonestrigger around a quarter of the non-recurring congestion, causing a significant amount of delays(888 million vehicle hours of delay in 2014) (Awolusi & Marks, 2019). Work zones alter theexisting geometric layout of a roadway and disturb its usual traffic patterns. These changes havesignificant implications for safety, mobility, and efficiency (Silverstein, Schorr, & Hamdar,2016). Smart work zones incorporate technical solutions that have been developed to addressthese problems by combining state-of-the-art sensor technologies, data communicationinfrastructure, and automated data processing capabilities.This research report takes a twofold approach to explore IoT-based smart work zone solutions toaddress the work zone safety problem. This approach involved two parallel and harmonizedresearch activities that aimed to explore the most promising approaches to improve safety inwork zones. The first of these activities involved a study of the existing intelligent transportationsystem (ITS) work zone safety systems that are available on the market. Special emphasis wasplaced on technical solutions providing connectivity among various system elements. The mainoutcome of this first element was the identification of three commercially available devices andthe associated deployment methods that can provide the greatest potential to improve work zonesafety. To gain an understanding of the nature of work zone crashes, the team acquired a workzone crash data set from North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (NCDOT)Transportation, Mobility, and Safety Division and conducted an analysis of the crashes thatoccurred in North Carolina’s work zones between 8/1/2008 and 1/31/2020. The analysisprovided insights into the major crash types and the triggers of the crashes that resulted in seriousinjury and fatality. Addressing the most common crash triggers and crash types can provide themaximum benefit in terms of reducing the number of crashes in work zones.Using IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones1

Based on the findings of the work zone crash data, the team focused on products and technicalapproaches that could provide the maximum potential for addressing the crash types identifiedby the statistical analysis of the work zone crashes. The project team conducted a comprehensiveanalysis of the available technologies, products, devices, methods, IoT-based approaches andsystems that have the potential to improve work zone safety. This report explains anddemonstrates how the recommended work zone safety systems and methods can be applied inpractical implementation cases. The team further supported the analysis by providing a detailedaccount of the possible implementation scenarios and by evaluating their limitations, reliability,and efficiency under various variables, such as time of the day, weather, road conditions, specificthreats and risks, and traffic patterns.The second element of this research evaluated and demonstrated two proof-of-concept systemsthat were developed by the author to be used in smart work zones. One system involved a workzone alert system, while the second one addressed the queue detection problem. The developedsystems are based on AI, computer vision, and IoT technologies. The author developed anexperimental setup for assessing the proof-of-concept systems using IoT, AI, and computervision technologies for improving work zone safety. The report provides insights on how theproposed proof-of-concept systems can be practically used in a typical smart work zone setting.The first system comprised a mobile device (smartphone) attached to a tripod to monitor therestricted area within a work zone, which alerts the workers when a work zone intrusion occurs.The second system provides queue detection capability and generates cloud-based alerts that canbe disseminated to display boards and other relevant parties.1.1.Research Need DefinitionThe impact of work zone-related crashes is substantial in North Carolina. In 2016, there were5,831 work zone crashes in the state. As a result of those incidents, there were 26 deaths and3,095 injuries. Among the victims who lost their lives, 24 were travelers, while two wereworkers. The statistical data indicated that there is a clear need for better and more efficientsafety devices and methods in work zones. It is clear that reliable and effective warning systemsshould be employed in work zones that can generate timely and efficient alerts within theUsing IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones2

vicinity of the area to help prevent crashes. In this regard, recent advances in the areas of sensordesign, AI, low-cost edge computing, IoT, computer vision, and dynamic web applications havethe potential to be translated and fused into integrative systems and reliable methods that wouldenable the implementation and operation of safer and smarter work zones. This research projectwas designed to explore the potential provided by various technological approaches to achievethis aim.1.2.Research ObjectivesThis study addressed the work zone safety problem by pursuing two parallel exploratory researchprocesses. The first process centered around a study of the existing commercially availablesystems and methods that have the highest potential to improve work zone safety. As a result,three commercially available products were identified that could be recommended to be used inwork zones. The second process involved developing two proof-of-concept systems. One ofthese was focused on detecting work zone intrusions and alerting the workers instantly. Thesecond one provides a capability for detecting queues and for generating and issuing cloud-basedalerts that can be disseminated to various users. The designs of these were based on AI, computervision, and IoT technologies.This project focused on the following research objectives: To provide an account of the key smart work zone technologies and methods that havethe highest potential to improve safety, efficiency, and mobility in work zones, and tospecify the particular types of threats that those devices and methods can mitigate. To explain and illustrate how available and emerging work zone safety systems andmethods can be implemented practically in the field. To recommend a number of commercially available devices or methods that have thegreatest potential to be used in the field to improve work zone safety. To investigate the feasibility of using AI, IoT, and computer vision technologies forimproving work zone safety by developing proof-of-concept systems that demonstrate thetechnical approaches proposed by this project.Using IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones3

2. Literature ReviewA typical work zone comprises five areas: advance warning area, transition area, buffer space,workspace, and termination area (Fig. 1). The buffer space provides a separation between theworkers and the transition area. The workspace is the area where the construction or maintenanceactivities occur. The length of a work zone varies greatly from project to project. The total lengthof a work zone can be as long as several miles or as short as a few hundred feet. Larger and morecomplex projects often require longer advance warning areas equipped with multiple messagedisplay boards and traffic channeling devices. They also feature longer transition and bufferareas.Figure 1 Areas of a road work zoneThe term Smart Work Zone is also referred to as a Work Zone Intelligent Transportation Systemand is defined as the deployment of intelligent transportation system (ITS) technologies andtechnical solutions to increase the safety, mobility, and efficiency of work zones. Smart workzone solutions are often deployed for a period of time, but on a temporary basis, typically untilthe project is completed (TxDOT, 2018). The IoT can be defined as systems of interconnectedsensors, actuators, and computing devices that have the capabilities to execute their tasks semiautonomously or fully autonomously. Most smart work zones are designed to automate certaintasks by processing the data generated by the connected sensors, and therefore, they show thecharacteristics of an IoT architecture.Using IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones4

A previous study (Gambatese, Lee, & Nnaji, 2017) determined what were the most commonlyused work zone safety technologies in highway construction projects in the United States.According to their findings, portable changeable massage signs (PCMSs) constituted the mostcommon technology used in work zones. These were followed by portable rumble strips,Doppler radar-based speed detection, and automated flaggers. Work zone intrusion alert systemswere the least popular technology used in highway construction projects. In the United States,the majority of smart work zone applications utilize radar sensors to measure traffic conditionsand PCMSs to disseminate warnings and guiding messages to motorists. In addition to thecurrent systems, there are also a number of novel technologies still under development. Some ofthese novel approaches may provide the potential to lower sensor costs and increase the systemefficiency. Bernas et al. conducted an extensive survey and comparison of low-cost noveltechnologies for road traffic monitoring (Bernas, et al., 2018).Smart work zone technologies generate data through various sensors, which measure a variety oftraffic parameters (e.g., speed, volume, lane occupancy, travel times) and also detect theoccurrences of significant events (queues, congestions, dangerous road conditions, work zoneintrusions, etc.). The data gathered by the sensors are processed by human or machine-basedsystems and converted into actions that address the pertinent safety, mobility, and efficiencyproblems. Smart work zones are typically designed to automate such actions for some of thecritical processes. For example, an end-of-queue detection unit can be configured to trigger analert message to be displayed on the PCMSs. Data can also be processed by operationaldispatchers or other stakeholders to help make decisions and gain situational awareness fromwork zones. Smart work zones can also be designed to record data for reporting and for in-depthanalysis for various types of decision-making (TxDOT, 2018).There are plenty of successful smart work zone applications applied throughout the UnitedStates. The Kansas Demonstration Project (Bledsoe, Raghunathan, & Ullman, 2014) is one suchexample that is useful for illustrating the structure of a typical smart work zone design. Theproject was developed during the construction of the I-35/Homestead Lane Interchange inJohnson County, Kansas. This particular smart work zone used trailer-mounted sensors to collectUsing IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones5

vehicle speed, classification, volume, and lane occupancy. Data was gathered for up to 10 lanesof traffic in each direction. Through an Internet connection, the traffic data was transmitted to aremote location, where it was processed by a software system. Depending on the trafficconditions, the system remotely activated messages that were displayed on the PCMSs to providealerts and guidance to motorists around the work zone.Another example is an ITS project implemented by the Michigan Department of Transportationfor the total closure of the I-496 in downtown Lansing. The setup featured 17 cameras and sixqueue detectors and “12 CMS [changeable message signs] to display advance travelerinformation to the public to help alleviate traffic congestion resulting from the full closure of amajor freeway” (Ullman, Schroeder, & Gopalakrishna, 2014).A third example is the New Mexico Department of Transportation’s deployment of ITS duringthe reconstruction of the I-40 and I-25 interchange in Albuquerque. The system included “eightcameras; eight modular CMS; four arrow dynamic signs; four all-light emitting diode (LED)portable CMS trailers; four portable traffic management systems, which integrate cameras andCMS on one fully portable unit; and four HAR units, all linked electronically to the temporaryBig I TMC to better manage incidents during the project” (Ullman, Schroeder, & Gopalakrishna,2014).Smart work zones require substantial expenditure for implementation and operation in manyconstruction projects. Currently, in most cases, a significant level of engineering effort isrequired to integrate the commercially available products into an effective and reliable technicalsolution for a work zone. Each work zone site has its own unique characteristics. Therefore, thesolutions often need to be customized to address the needs of the particular project setting. Forexample, what constitutes a queue can vary from one project site to another. Consequently, smartwork zone designers often allocate a considerable amount of time and effort to customizing thecontrol logic used in their systems. A cost breakdown of the Kansas project illustrates the costfactors involved in a typical smart work zone project (Bledsoe, Raghunathan, & Ullman, 2014).In that particular example, the total cost of the smart work zone system was estimated as 1,650,000. A significant portion (54.7%) of the budget was allocated for theUsing IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones6

software/consulting and ITS software upgrade activities, which focused on the customizationefforts needed for the project. Some cost examples of a number of smart work zone projects areshown in Table 1. It can be seen that the total costs vary between 1,500,000 to 2,000,000.Guidance on the cost factors involved in smart work zone systems can be found in (DecisionTree to Identify Potential ITS/IWZ Scoping Needs, 2019).Table 1 Examples of smart work zone costsProject DescriptionSmart Work Zone Technology CostsConstruction of the I-35/Homestead LaneTotal cost: 1,650,000.Interchange in Johnson County, KansasMajor equipment items:(Bledsoe, Raghunathan, & Ullman, 2014)-22 Wavetronix sensors-18 portable changeable message signs-7 variable speed limit signs on I-35-6 CCTV cameras to facilitate the real-timemonitoring of traffic conditionsThe Michigan Department of TransportationTotal cost: 2 milliondeployed ITS during a total closure of the I-Major equipment items:496 in downtown Lansing (Ullman,-17 camerasSchroeder, & Gopalakrishna, 2014)-6 queue detectors-12 CMS to displayThe New Mexico Department ofTotal cost: 1.5 millionTransportation deployedMajor equipment items:ITS during the reconstruction of the I-40 and-8 camerasI-25 in Albuquerque.-8 modular CMS-4 arrow dynamic signs-4 all-LED PCMS trailers-4 portable traffic management systems(integrating cameras and CMS)-4 HAR unitsUsing IoT Technology to Create Smart Work Zones7

The design of a smart work zone constitutes an optimization problem. The efforts often focus ondeciding on a system configuration that would provide the maximum benefit that can bedelivered with the limited resources available. Therefore, system designers should have a soundprocess to decide on the elements and features of their smart work zones. The MinnesotaDepartment of Transportation (MnDOT) provides a set of guidelines to help identify theITS/IWZ technology needs (Decision Tree to Identi

of a smart work zone to improve the work zone safety. Driven by the insights gained through the literature review and from the analysis of the North Carolina work zone crash data, two proof-of-concept systems were developed using IoT, AI, and computer vision technologies for work zone safety. The developed systems provide capabilities

Related Documents:

SAP Cloud Platform Internet of Things Device Management Your Gateway System Environment Cloud Platform PaaSeg., HANA, Kafka, PostgreSQL App User Admin IoT Core Service IoT Message Management Service Your IoT Data IoT service IoT Gateway Edge Devices Device 1 Device 2 Device 3 IoT Gateway Cloud IoT Service Cockpit Send and receive

MINOR DEGREE IN INTERNET OF THINGS (IoT) (DRAFT SYLLABUS) Course Structure Sr. No. Semester Temp. Course Code Course Title L T P Credits 1. 3 IoT-1 Introduction to Internet of Things 3 0 2 4 2. 4 IoT-2 IoT Protocols 3 0 2 4 3. 5 IoT-3 IoT System Design 3 0 2 4 4. 6 IoT-4 Industry 4.0 and IIoT 3 0 2 4 5.

Open Data Application Programming Interface (API) for IoT Data in Smart Cities and Communities Y.FW.IC.MDSC Framework of identification and connectivity of Moving Devices in Smart City Y.IoT-DA-Counterfeit Information Management Digital Architecture to combat counterfeiting in IoT Y.IoT-Interop An architecture for IoT interoperability Y.IoT-IoD-PT

Essentials WS IoT 2019 Datacenter WS IoT 2019 Storage Standard WS IoT 2019 Storage Workgroup WS IoT 2019 . product key like Windows 10 IoT Enterprise? No. It does have Product Key Entry Activation (PKEA) but all Windows Server editions since 2008 use OEM Activ

Oracle IoT Cloud Service . IoT Cloud Service delivers solid foundation to quickly build IoT solutions . that integrates with your enterprise applications . and extend the reach of the IoT and business applications to your physical devices . and sensors . Devices . Business Applications . IoT Cloud Service Platform . Connect . Analyze .

IoT, discuss how IoT operations can be governed and what is needed, including the roles and responsibilities involved in IoT governance, and describe a proposed governance framework implementation as well as the future challenges facing IoT governance. This paper is intended to showcase how IoT governance can be implemented.

RUCKUS IoT-ready access points (APs)—Built-in IoT radios to establish multi-standard wireless access for Wi-Fi and non-Wi-Fi IoT endpoints. RUCKUS IoT modules—Radio or radio-and-sensor devices that connect to a RUCKUS IoT-ready AP to enable endpoint connectivity based on standards such as Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) and Zigbee.

AIOTI WG03 IoT Reference Architecture Consolidation of IoT reference architecture from many sources, i.e. IoT-A, IEEE P2413, OneM2M, ITU, JTC1 Architectural views based on ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 Interacts with 10 A consolidated high level IoT Reference Architecture ³7KLQJV IoT Device User invokes IoT Service exposes associated Virtual Entity Legend