Comparative Pathology, Molecular Pathogenicity, Immunological Features .

1y ago
4 Views
1 Downloads
1.11 MB
23 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Brady Himes
Transcription

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences2021; 25: 7162-7184Comparative pathology, molecular pathogenicity,immunological features, and geneticcharacterization of three highly pathogenichuman coronaviruses (MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV,and SARS-CoV-2)A.A. RABAAN1,2,3, A.A. MUTAIR4,5,6, Z.A. ALAWI7, S. ALHUMAID8,M.A. MOHAINI9,10, J. ALDALI11, R. TIRUPATHI12,13, A.A. SULE14, T. KORITALA15,R. ADHIKARI16, M. BILAL17, M. DHAWAN18,19, R.K. MOHAPATRA20, R. TIWARI21,S.A. SAMI22, S. MITRA23, M.K. PANDEY24, H. HARAPAN25,26,27,T.B. EMRAN28, K. DHAMA29Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi ArabiaDepartment of Public Health and Nutrition, The University of Haripur, Haripur, Pakistan3College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia4Research Center, Almoosa Specialist Hospital, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia5College of Nursing, Princess Norah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia6School of Nursing, Wollongong University, Wollongong, NSW, Australia7Division of Allergy and Immunology, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia8Administration of Pharmaceutical Care, Al-Ahsa Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia9Basic Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin AbdulazizUniversity for Health Sciences, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia10King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia11Pathology Organization, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia12Department of Medicine Keystone Health, Penn State University School of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA13Department of Medicine Wellspan Chambersburg and Waynesboro Hospitals, Penn StateChambersburg, PA, USA14Department of Informatics and Outcomes, St. Joseph Mercy Oakland Pontiac, MI, USA15Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System Mankato, Mayo Clinic College ofMedicine and Science, MN, USA16Department of Hospital Medicine, Franciscan Health Lafayette, IN, USA17School of Life Science and Food Engineering, Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huaian, China18Department of Microbiology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India19The Trafford Group of Colleges, Manchester, UK20Department of Chemistry, Government College of Engineering, Keonjhar, Odisha, India21Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, College of Veterinary Sciences,Uttar Pradesh Pandit DeenDayal Upadhyaya PashuChikitsa Vigyan Vishwavidyalaya Evam GoAnusandhanSansthan (DUVASU), Mathura, India22Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Chittagong, Chittagong,Bangladesh23Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh24Department of Translational Medicine Center, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal,Madhya Pradesh, India25Medical Research Unit, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia26Tropical Diseases Centre, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia27Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Aceh, Indonesia28Department of Pharmacy, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Chittagong, Bangladesh29Division of Pathology, ICAR-Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Bareilly, UttarPradesh, India127162Corresponding Authors: Kuldeep Dhama, MVSc, Ph.D; e-mail: kdhama@rediffmail.comTalha Bin Emran, Ph.D; e-mail: talhabmb@bgctub.ac.bd

Comparative review of three human coronavirusesAbstract. – The last two decades have wit-nessed the emergence of three deadly coronaviruses (CoVs) in humans: severe acute respiratorysyndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), Middle Eastrespiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV),and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). There are still no reliableand efficient therapeutics to manage the devastating consequences of these CoVs. Of these,SARS-CoV-2, the cause of the currently ongoingcoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, has posed great global health concerns. TheCOVID-19 pandemic has resulted in an unprecedented crisis with devastating socio-economic and health impacts worldwide. This highlightsthe fact that CoVs continue to evolve and havethe genetic flexibility to become highly pathogenic in humans and other mammals. SARSCoV-2 carries a high genetic homology to thepreviously identified CoV (SARS-CoV), and theimmunological and pathogenic characteristicsof SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS containkey similarities and differences that can guidetherapy and management. This review presentssalient and updated information on comparative pathology, molecular pathogenicity, immunological features, and genetic characterizationof SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2; thiscan help in the design of more effective vaccinesand therapeutics for countering these pathogenic CoVs.Key Words:Pathology, Immunology, Genetic characterization,Coronaviruses, MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2,COVID-19.IntroductionThe devastating fact that zoonotic diseases attributed to coronavirus (CoV) strains can resultin pandemics came to public attention in 2003after a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) outbreak. Since this realization, scientists and public health officialshave raised concerns over health threats posedto the human population by the three coronaviruses (CoVs) SARS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), andsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2)1-7. Among at least six strains ofhuman-infecting CoVs that have been identifiedby studies, these three have proved to be highlypathogenic as they trigger severe pneumonia andsystemic symptoms in humans5,8-13. CoVs are acomplex and diverse family of enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses and aredivided into four genera: alpha, beta, gamma, anddelta CoV8,14,15. Of these, beta CoVs have drawnthe most attention due to their ability to cross animal-human barriers and act as significant globalinfectious agents2,6,8,16. SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2,and MERS-CoV have been identified as the mostimportant and evolving beta CoVs, and their molecular biology and immunological features remain to be investigated in detail1,4,5,8,17-19. Seasonalvariations have been observed in the pattern ofthese viruses: SARS-CoV-2 outbreak occurs inthe winter, in contrast to MERS-CoV and SARSCoV outbreaks and triggering severe pneumonia18. Moreover, these three viruses show similargenomic composition, clinical manifestations,and route of transmission1,4,20. The current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)caused by SARS-CoV-2 has apparent similarities with SARS9,10,21, including disease progression, escape from the host immune system, andsubsequent acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). The International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) designated the causalagent of COVID-19 as “SARS-CoV-2” due to itssimilarities with SARS-CoV19,22-24.During the COVID-19 pandemic, the worldhas experienced unprecedented challenges, withover 4.9 million deaths and more than 243 million confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection inover 225 countries with a fatality rate ranging between 1.5% and 5% as of October 26, 202117,22,25.A high case fatality rate of about 49%9,26 has beenreported in patients with an acute disease requiring ventilator support and Intensive Care Unit(ICU) admission. There have been significantbreakthroughs in vaccine development, with several vaccines administered globally for protectionagainst SARS-CoV-2. In addition, many effectivedrugs and therapeutic candidates are being evaluated, such as antivirals, monoclonal antibodies,cytokine inhibitors, and immunosuppressants27-32.SARS-CoV-2, when observed under an electronmicroscope, has a structure similar to a crown (corona). The mechanism of virus entry into the host isidentical to that of SARS-CoV, which binds to thehuman angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)receptor via its protein receptor-binding domain(RBD)33-35. In contrast, MERS-CoV binds to theDPP4 receptor to enter host cells. Genomic analysisdata has revealed that the genome sequence similarity of SARS-CoV-2 to SARS-CoV and MERSCoV is 80% and 50%, respectively21,36. While exploring the evolutionary potential of SARS-CoV-2,studies have found that its genome exhibits 96%7163

A.A. Rabaan, A.A. Mutair, Z.A. Alawi, S. Alhumaid, M.A. Mohaini, J. Aldali, R. Tirupathi, et alsimilarity to that of bat-derived CoV isolated in201337,38. SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV have 380amino acid (AA) substitution sites. It has been hypothesized that any substitution in the AA sequencecould lead to a possible novel viral protein functionwith unclear pathogenesis39. The spike (S) proteinand the nucleocapsid protein are linked to highertransmission capability and lower pathogenicityin SARS-CoV-2. However, the mutations in the Sprotein are especially crucial because the S proteinis key for the first step of viral transmission: entryinto the cell by binding to the ACE2 receptor40-44.SARS-CoV-2 steadily mutates during continuoustransmission among humans, and naturally occurring S mutations can reduce or enhance cell entryvia the ACE2 receptor44,45. According to a recentstudy46, six AA residues (D480, T487, Y442, N479,L472, and Y4911 for SARS-CoV, and Q493, S494,L455, F486, Y505, and N501 for SARS-CoV-2) areessential for binding to the human ACE2 receptor.Among these six SARS-CoV-2 AA residues, thelack of similarity of five residues to those of SARSCoV may be attributed to the deletions, insertions,or mutations in the S1 and S2 regions, which areresponsible for evolutionary changes46,47. The novel strain has an evolutionary path different fromthose of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, with lineage similarity to previously evaluated bat-derivedCoV. However, there are proteomic and genomicdifferences between the bat and human CoVs, indicating a unique immune invasion mechanismand a distinct immunopathology associated withhost response48. The common clinical symptomsof COVID-19 are similar to those of SARS: drycough (67.7%), fever (87.9%), myalgia (34.8%), fatigue (69.6%), hypoxia, and progressive dyspneafollowed by damage to multiple organs. In contrastto SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 is more transmissible, but the overall mortality rate is lower than thatfor SARS-CoV infection. Like MERS and SARS,COVID-19 is likely to be more severe in elderlypeople and those suffering underlying comorbidities, including many chronic health conditions.Here, we present salient and updated informationon comparative pathology, molecular pathogenicity, immunological features, and genetic characterization of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARSCoV-2. As the current pandemic remains ongoing,this review can contribute to the design of moreeffective vaccines and therapeutics.Early Phase of Viral InfectionIn the early stages, SARS infection causesnon-specific symptoms such as myalgia, fever,7164headache, and severe fatigue49. These symptomstend to diminish in seven days. Sequential nasopharyngeal aspirate samples from SARS patientsindicate a direct relationship between clinical progression and viral load50. After its peak, viral loadusually decreases rapidly, with IgG seroconversion serving as an indicator of specific immunitydevelopment. However, some patients’ clinicalconditions can worsen during this period, creating inconsistencies with viral clearance observations. Delay in viral peak can indicate absence orhindrance of host antiviral responses necessary toenhance viral clearance51.A retrospective study evaluating the cause ofworsening clinical condition after viral load reduction highlighted the underlying association between viral clearance, immune dysregulation, anddisease development52. The host hyper-inflammatory response, not the cytopathic effect of the virus, may be responsible for this phenomenon36,51.To some extent, rapid viral load elevation couldbe the contributing factor for disease pathology.Clinical features such as diarrhea, oxygen desaturation, hepatic dysfunction, and fatality indicatethat high viral load may contribute to direct organdysfunction49,53. Clinical specimens of variousanatomic sites of organ dysfunction have yieldedvirus. For instance, stool specimen was highly related to diarrhea, with viral particles detected inileum and colon biopsies observed under an electron microscope54. There is extensive evidenceregarding the relationship between pathologicaleffects, viremia, and viral loads from these findings. Strong evidence exists of high viral loadsassociated with massive infiltration of the inflammatory immune cells being significantly linkedto worse clinical outcomes in patients54. Patientswith elevated viral load at an early stage were alsolikely to have higher mortality55,56. Therefore, itis essential to address the molecular pathology,immunological characteristics, pathogenicity,and genetic sequence of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV,SARS-CoV-2, and other CoVs. A few of the general characteristics of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoVand SARS-CoV-2 are presented in Table I.Genetic Similarities of MERS-CoV,SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2Among the CoV subtypes, beta CoVs causesevere and fatal diseases in humans, while alpha CoVs cause mild infections. The genomic sequences of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, andSARS-CoV-2 are quite similar, but SARS-CoV-2displays significant differences in genome com-

Comparative review of three human coronavirusesTable I. Characteristics of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2.FeaturesMERS-CoVOutbreakLocation of the first caseKey hostsraccoon dogsActive cases confirmedSARS-CoV2012, April2002, NovemberJeddah, Saudi ArabiaGuangdong, ChinaBat, camelBat, palm civets,Bat, pangolin2519 (from 2012 until8096January 31, 2020)Genome length (bp)30,11929,751Mortality34.40%10% (6.8-16.1%)Days took to infect the first 1000 persons903130Incubation period (day)5 to 62 to 7Basic reproduction number (R0)12-4ReceptorDPP4ACE2Mode of transmissionTouching or consumptionBelieved to haveof camel milk or meat.spreadThere is limited human-to-humanfrom bats.transmission despite closeThere is evidencephysical contactof human-to-humantransmissionposition compared to its predecessors57. Genomic analysis suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is closelyrelated to pangolin CoV (86%-92%) and bat CoV(96%), which further suggests bats as the primary reservoir43,58-60. Furthermore, the outbreak ofSARS-CoV-2 is thought to be linked to tradingpractices in Wuhan’s wet market, and due tothe genetic identities between SARS-CoV-2 andBatCoV RaTG13 (a bat-CoV), it has been hypothesized that bats could be the natural sourceof SARS-CoV-28,43,61. A plethora of research evidence shows that pangolins may be the intermediate host—there is 99% homology betweenSARS-CoV-2 and the CoV strain originating frompangolins—but bats are the natural reservoir forthe virus62,63. Bats are generally recognized aspotential primary reservoirs for most of the RNAviruses64. The genome of SARS-CoV-2 showed96.2% homology to that of the bat CoV (RaTG13)collected in the Yunnan province of China43. TheSARS-CoV-2 genome is closely related (88%) tozoonotic bat viruses, bat-SL-CoVZXC45, and batSL-CoVZXC2165. The most commonly identifiedsequence similarity between these bat and humanviruses is in the E gene, and the least commonly identified similarity is in the S gene. MultipleSARS-CoV-2 proteins have the same sequenceas the bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21,except for the S protein and protein 1366. A teamof researchers concluded that pangolin-CoV is aSARS-CoV-22019, DecemberWuhan, ChinaOver 243 million(as of October 26, 2021)29,9032-5%487 to 141.4-5.5ACE2Human-to-humanon close contacttransmission occurs whenthere is close physicalcontact (mainlythrough respiratory aerosols/droplets). The transmissionsmay be possible throughfecal-oral routeand contaminatedobjects/ surfaces/fomiteshighly associated descendant of SARS-CoV-2,suggesting that pangolins could be the naturalreservoirs for SARS-CoV-2 and bat CoV67. The sequence similarity (89.2%) between SARS-CoV-2and RaTG13, in terms of the RBD, is less thanthe sequence similarity (97.2%) between SARSCoV-2 and pangolin-CoV. Additionally, the lattercontains six complete identical RBD residues,whereas the former contains only one identicalamino acid residue43. Notably, pangolins in China are categorized as endangered due to theirdecreasing numbers, which are close to the pointof extinction; this reduces the likelihood of pangolins acting as an intermediate host of SARSCoV-2. The selling of pangolins is against the law,and they have not been spotted in Wuhan’s wetmarkets in recent times68. Through the use of theoptimized random forest model for human sequences of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, intermediate hosts (Camelids and Carnivores) were confirmed based on evolutionary signatures. With thesame method, SARS-CoV-2 evolutionary signatures identified bats as hosts, further confirmingbats as the suspected origin of the present pandemic69. Furthermore, a recent study70 based ongenetic similarities proposed that snakes may beintermediate hosts, as there are similarities in codons among SARS-CoV-2, bat CoV, and a snakevirus. However, this analysis was insufficient toreach a conclusive hypothesis, as several limita7165

A.A. Rabaan, A.A. Mutair, Z.A. Alawi, S. Alhumaid, M.A. Mohaini, J. Aldali, R. Tirupathi, et altions were present in the study71. In any case, betaCoVs are less likely to infect reptiles by crossingover through mammals72. These findings madethe natural reservoir of CoV a controversial topic,and a contingent of groups embrace the idea thatdifferent intermediate host species are yet to bediscovered, other than bats73-75. The disease outbreak related to SARS-CoV-2 demonstrates concealed virus reservoirs in animals that may spreadinto human populations occasionally76. The lowereffective number of codons and the extreme codon usage bias of SARS-CoV-2 in S, envelop, andmatrix protein genes suggest higher gene expression efficiency than that of SARS, bat SARS, orMERS-CoV, which is similar to Pangolin betaCoV77. In the human host, the SARS-CoV-2 dinucleotide pair, UpG and CpA dinucleotides, werehighly preferred, and CpG dinucleotide was highly avoided. This strategy might imply evasion ofthe human immune system78. Multiple sequencealignments of the ACE2 receptor proteins of humans with that of dogs, cats, tigers, minks, andother animals revealed a high homology and fullconservation of the five AA residues, 353-KGDFR-357, among the species, which may throwlight on the possibility of transmission of SARSCoV-2 from animals to humans78.MERS-CoV is closely related to two bat CoV(HKU4, HKU5); it has been suggested that itmay be isolated from bats, and dromedary camelsprobably act as intermediate host, as evidencedfrom serological studies79,80. In Qatar, the presence of MERS-CoV RNA was reported in swabsobtained from dromedary camels that shared acorrelation with two human cases of MERS81. Acomprehensive evolutionary relationship analysisdepicted the origin of MERS-CoV from bats dueto the occurrence of recombination events withinS and ORF1ab genes82,83. Recombination eventswere also reported in SARS-CoV as regions forputative recombination were detected via computational genomic studies84. The MERS-CoVstrains isolated from humans and camels havebeen reported to share over 99% identity withvariations located in the ORF3, ORF4b, and Sgenes85. SARS-CoV-2 shows 80% similarity withSARS-CoV and 51% with the MERS-CoV86.Most of the coding areas of SARS-CoV-2 indicate a similar genomic architecture to that of thebat-originating CoVs and SARS-CoV. The twelvecoding regions predicted are; lab, 3, E, M, 7, 8, 9,10B, N, S, 13, and 14. The proteins encoded byall the three CoVs are mostly similar in length87.However, there is a significant variation in the S7166protein of SARS-CoV-2, which is longer in comparison to the protein encoded in the bat CoVs,SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV88.SARS-CoV-2 shares many similarities in architecture and pathogenicity with SARS-CoVcompared to MERS-CoV. Mathematical models such as decision-tree experiments have alsoshown remarkable characteristics of an AA sequence of SARS-CoV-2, which is different fromMERS-CoV12. The CoVs use a similar S proteinfor binding to their respective host cells and thesame cellular protease enzyme for the activationof the S protein89. The S protein in SARS-CoV-2has a sequence similarity of about 77% with thatof SARS-CoV, structural proteins are more than90% similar to SARS-CoV, and 32.79% similar toMERS-CoV counterparts. The receptor-bindingdomain (S2) of SARS-CoV-2 has a sequence similarity of 74% with the S2 domain in SARS-CoVand an overall similarity of about 52% with thatof SARS-CoV90. The E protein of SARS-CoV-2 is96.00% similar to that of SARS-CoV and 36.00%similar to that of MERS-CoV. The M protein ofSARS-CoV-2 is 89.59% similar to that of SARSCoV and 39.27% similar to that of MERS-CoV.The SARS-CoV-2 N protein is 85.41% similar tothat of SARS-CoV and 48.47% similar to that ofMERS-CoV 91.Accessory proteins are regarded as essentialfor in vitro replication of viral particles; however,some of these proteins are associated with viralpathogenesis92,93. The 3CLpro (nsp5) and RdRp(nsp12) proteins of SARS-CoV-2 are prime mediators of replication and new virion production,and they share high sequence identity with SARSCoV and MERS-CoV94. Recent reports95,96 havedemonstrated that ORF8b and ORF3a of SARSCoV catalyze the induction of proinflammatorycytokines and thus play a role in regulating chemotaxis in macrophages. ORF8b of SARS-CoVand MERS-CoV is also involved in suppressingthe induction of interferon (IFN-I)97,98. Anotherstudy demonstrated that ORF8 of SARS-CoV-2variant binds to major histocompatibility complex(MHC) and regulates its degradation in cell culture, indicating that immune evasion may be mediated by ORF8. However, SARS-CoV-2 ORF8shows low homology to SARS-CoV ORF899.Generally, no homologous accessory proteinsare found in CoV genera. However, some similar kinds of proteins might be present in closelyassociated CoVs. For instance, SARS-CoV-2 andSARS-CoV show over 80% similarities in ORF3a, 6, 7a, 7b, and 9b protein sequences.

Comparative review of three human coronavirusesComparative Molecular Pathology ofMERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2InfectionSARS-CoV is considered a zoonotic virusthat was transmitted to humans from birds prior to human-to-human transmission100. However,in humans, various risk factors including age,underlying metabolic disease like diabetes, andheart disease, lead to an increase in death risk101.SARS starts with viral infection in the respiratorytract of people of all ages via droplet transmission of virus present in the mucus or saliva102. Itwas reported that viral loads of SARS-CoV decreased with increased severity of the disease.On the contrary, a similar trend is still unclearfor MERS-CoV103. Clinical symptoms associatedwith SARS-CoV infection include fever, chills,diarrhea, myalgia, and fatigue104. SARS-CoV enters into the human cell through the attachmentof viral S glycoprotein (S protein) to the ACE2receptor. ACE2 functions as a dominant host receptor, and the presence of two co-receptors, DCSIGN (CD209) and L-SIGN (CD209L), are alsoreported105,106. In dendritic cells, viral infectiondoes not occur prior to DC-SIGN binding, but thisbinding may enhance SARS-CoV infection anddissemination substantially. On the other hand,L-SIGN is considered an alternative receptor thatmay bind with its spike protein and regulate cellular entry of SARS-CoV107. Changes occur in theS glycoprotein in the endosomal environment viathe serine protease cathepsins B and L to assistin the union process108. The S glycoprotein is notjust an essential structural protein of CoVs; it performs a vital role in the association of virus withthe host cell. The S- protein is made up of twosubunits: S1 and S2109. The S1 subunit contains theRBD, which is responsible for binding the virusto the host receptor, while the S2 subunit controlsmembrane fusion occurring during virus-hostmembrane interactions. These interactions leadto the penetration of the viral genome into the cytoplasm of the host cell110. SARS-CoV-2 encodesa longer S protein compared to SARS-CoV andMERS-CoV, as identified by phylogenetic analysis20,76. The RBD of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, andSARS-CoV-2 binds to functional receptors present on the cellular surface, allowing penetration ofthe virus into host cells111. SARS-CoV and SARSCoV-2 predominately utilize angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) as a host receptor105,110,111.Additionally, viral entry by antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) has been observed112.Through ADE, the B cell producing antibodiesmay also expedite viral infection113. Surprisingly, ACE2 exhibits stronger affinities for SARSCoV-2 compared to SARS-CoV114. For instance,the interaction between host ACE2 and SARSCoV-2 spike ectodomain displayed 10- to 20-foldhigher binding affinity than that for SARS-CoVin a recent study115. Another study speculated thatSARS-CoV-2 could use other cellular receptorsand proteins to bind with host cell receptors suchas integrins116. However, there is to date insufficient evidence to corroborate this assumption.CD147-SP can be considered another entry portalof SARS-CoV-2117. In addition to attachment of Sproteins to functional host receptors, priming ofS proteins is necessary for invading the cellularmachinery of the host118.Apart from lung cells, the heart, kidney, liver,and tongue also express ACE2 receptors on theirepithelial cells119,120. In fact, cilia could be the entrygate of the virus121. Surprisingly, after the S glycoprotein attaches to ACE2, there is a significantcilia loss, squamous cell metaplasia, and elevatedmacrophage migration into the alveoli, causingnotable damage to alveoli in the lungs. Additionally, SARS-CoV generates 7a and 3a proteins thatlead to substantial programmed death of cells inthe lungs, liver, and kidney122. Host translationelongation factor 1 (EF-1A) and serine protease2 strongly bind to N protein of both SARS-CoVand MERS-CoV, and subsequently induce localor systemic inflammatory responses94. TH1 activation also causes increased inflammation in theaffected organs. MERS-CoV infection is morecommon in males than females123, and SARSCoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection follow the sameorder of gender prevalence8. Clinical presentationof infection may range from being asymptomatic to massive organ damage. Notably, MERSis closely associated with metabolic syndromessuch as diabetes mellitus, obesity, and cardiovascular morbidities124. The developing metabolicsyndrome in most cases alters the immunologicalfunction, exposing the infected person to furtherrisk of more infections.Many previous investigations reported thatCoV infection leads to cytopathic effects, including cell lysis and apoptosis. Cellular fusion iscaused by the virus and usually leads to syncytiaformation. These processes are observed in thecell due to the mobilization of vesicles that formthe replication complex and cause disruption ofGolgi complexes at the time of viral replication94.Unlike in SARS-CoV, DPP4 CD26 is the MERSCoV attachment site to lung and respiratory tract7167

A.A. Rabaan, A.A. Mutair, Z.A. Alawi, S. Alhumaid, M.A. Mohaini, J. Aldali, R. Tirupathi, et alepithelial cells125. Notably, MERS-CoV carries aparticular RBD in its S glycogen that binds DDP4on the host cells. DPP4 plays a significant rolein altering glucose metabolism, activating theT cells, modulating cytotoxicity, and regulatingapoptosis126. SARS-CoV-2 infects both the lowerand upper respiratory systems and multiple otherorgans and systems, thus causing multiple pathological conditions, including neurological andgastrointestinal manifestations and kidney damage127-129. ACE2 receptors are abundant in oralmucosa, nasal secretory and ciliated cells, lowerairways, lungs, cornea, ileum, and colon. Hence,patients suffer from collapsed lung and symptomsof diarrhea130,131. When spike D614 is replaced bymutant G614, S protein possesses greater stabilityand a potential to grow at a temperature of 37oC,compared to early SARS-CoV-2 isolates, whichshowed a preference for 33oC132. While SARSCoV-2 is less pathogenic than MERS-CoV orSARS-CoV, its human-to-human transmission isfaster1,4,133. Underlying illnesses (comorbidities)such as heart disease, diabetes, and hypertensionhave a close association with the severe pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in affected patients134.These disorders reduce the generation of IFN andinterleukin that leads to the downregulation ofthe host’s innate immunity via blockage of lymphocyte and macrophage functions. In healthypeople, ACE2 alters the renin-angiotensin systemthrough angiotensin-II breakdown into angiotensin-17 to prevent the development of acute lungfailure135. Acute lung injury is directly relatedto a deficiency in ACE2 and an increase in AngII136,137. Postmortem analysis of SARS-CoV-2 patients has revealed pneumocyte hyperplasia andpartial fibrosis leading to thickening and collapseof alveoli93,138The sgRNAs are presumed to be translated intoaccessory and structural proteins of CoV in thecytoplasm. A recently concluded in vitro studyindicated that the enzymatic function of the nsp14exoribonuclease (ExoN) is crucial for replicationof SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV139. By enhancing degradation and interfering with host mRNAtranslation, beta CoV nsp1 inhibits the expressionof host genes and thus serves as a potent virulencefactor140. MERS-CoV nsp1 inhibits mRNA translation and induces mRNA degradation by selectively targeting nuclear mRNA translation andavoiding cytoplasmic viral mRNAs141. Currentstructural analysis and related studies have unveiled that SARS-CoV-2 nsp1 inhibits ribosomalmRNA entrance142. The delta CoVs and gamma7168CoVs cannot produce nsp1 due to lack of nsp1/nsp2 cleavage sites, though the same host shutoffis triggered by other mechanisms that have notbeen explored well.Clinical and Immunological

University for Health Sciences, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia 10King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia 11Pathology Organization, Imam Mohammed Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia 12Department of Medicine Keystone Health, Penn State University School of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA

Related Documents:

Pathology: Molecular Pathology Page updated: August 2020 This section contains information to help providers bill for clinical laboratory tests or examinations related to molecular pathology and diagnostic services. Molecular Pathology Code Chart The chart included later in this section correlates molecular pathology CPT and HCPCS

Vista Pathology Laboratory – User’s Guide 1 Who We Are Reedy, Michael MD Pathology Nixon, Randal MD, PhD Pathology Neuropathology Loudermilk, Allison MD Pathology Hematopathology Wu, Bryan MD Pathology Breast Pathology Dermatopathology Pike, Robin MD Pathology Cy

Oct 01, 2009 · Genome Biology 2009, 10:R4 2009Michielseet al.Volume 10, Issue 1, Article R4Research Open Access Insight into the molecular requirements for pathogenicity of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp

Subspecialty: Hepatobiliary Pathology, Gastrointestinal Pathology Assistant Professor of Pathology Dr. Kiyoko Oshima is the Director of Clinical Hepatic Pathology and Assistant Professor in the Department of Pathology at the Johns Hopkins Hospital University School of Medicine. She joined the Hopkins faculty in 2017.

Chicago Pathology Society CLINICAL INTERESTS: Neuropathology, Cytopathology, Autopsy, Surgical Pathology pathology.osu.edu Saman SeyedAhmadian, MD is an Assistant Professor - Clinical for Ohio State’s Department of Pathology. Insert photo here THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY

pathologists combine molecular tests with conventional pathological evaluation methods, pathology laboratories should be designed and operated in accordance with the requirements of molecular testing procedures. Adequate space, appropriate equipment and qualified personnel are required to establish a molecular pathology laboratory.

microorganisms Review Silence of the Lambs: The Immunological and Molecular Mechanisms of COVID-19 in Children in Comparison with Adults Francesca Cusenza 1, Giusy Davino 1, Tiziana D’Alvano 1, Alberto Argentiero 1, Valentina Fainardi 1, Giovanna Pisi 1, Nicola Principi 2 and Susanna Esposi

An introduction to literary studies/ Mario Klarer. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. English literature—History and criticism—Theory, etc. 2. American literature—History and criticism— Theory, etc. I. Title. PR21.K5213 1999 820.9–dc21 99–25771 CIP ISBN 0-203-97841-2 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-415-21169-7 (hbk)